Fracture Prediction from Trabecular Bone Score is Unaffected by Anti-Resorptive Treatment: A Registry-Based Cohort Study.

Trabecular bone score (TBS) predicts osteoporotic fractures independent of bone mineral density (BMD) and clinical risk factors. The aim of this study was to explore whether anti-resorptive treatment affects fracture risk prediction from TBS using a large clinical registry that includes all dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) tests for the Province of Manitoba, Canada. Cohort 1 included 53,863 individuals aged ≥ 40 years (11.4% men; mean age 64.1 years) who had not received any anti-resorptive therapy in the year prior the baseline DXA. Cohort 2 comprised 22,917 individuals aged ≥ 40 years (6% men, mean age 66.7 years) undergoing a second DXA visit. Anti-resorptive medication was initiated in the first year after DXA in 13,439 (25%) individuals from Cohort 1 (87.9% bisphosphonates); among Cohort 2 8,864 (38.7%) had received anti-resorptive medication in the year before DXA (77.8% bisphosphonates). Incident major osteoporotic fracture (MOF), hip fracture and any fracture were identified over mean follow up 8.6 and 7.0 years for Cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. Area under the curve showed significant risk stratification for all fracture types and treatment levels, whether treatment was initiated after TBS measurement (Cohort 1) or prior to TBS measurement (Cohort 2). In Cox regression models, without and with covariate adjustment, fracture prediction from TBS was unaffected by anti-resorptive medication use (p-interaction >0.5 for all analyses). In conclusion, TBS was a robust predictor of fracture in models adjusted for clinical risk factors and BMD. The use of anti-resorptive therapy, either in the year before or following TBS measurement, did not attenuate fracture risk prediction by TBS compared to untreated individuals.

Baseline bone turnover marker levels can predict change in bone mineral density during antiresorptive treatment in osteoporotic patients: the Copenhagen bone turnover marker study.

Anti-resorptive osteoporosis treatment might be more effective in patients with high bone turnover. In this registry study including clinical data, high pre-treatment bone turnover measured with biochemical markers was correlated with higher bone mineral density increases. Bone turnover markers may be useful tools to identify patients benefitting most from anti-resorptive treatment. INTRODUCTION: In randomized, controlled trials of bisphosphonates, high pre-treatment levels of bone turnover markers (BTM) were associated with a larger increase in bone mineral density (BMD). The purpose of this study was to examine this correlation in a real-world setting. METHODS: In this registry-based cohort study of osteoporosis patients (n = 158) receiving antiresorptive therapy, the association between pre-treatment levels of plasma C-telopeptide of type I Collagen (CTX) and/or N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP) and change in bone mineral density (BMD) at lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck upon treatment was examined. Patients were grouped according to their pre-treatment BTM levels, defined as values above and below the geometric mean for premenopausal women. RESULTS: Pre-treatment CTX correlated with annual increase in total hip BMD, where patients with CTX above the geometric mean experienced a larger annual increase in BMD (p = 0.008) than patients with CTX below the geometric mean. The numerical pre-treatment level of CTX showed a similar correlation at all three skeletal sites (total hip (p = 0.03), femoral neck (p = 0.04), and lumbar spine (p = 0.0003)). A similar association was found for PINP where pre-treatment levels of PINP above the geometric mean correlated with a larger annual increase in BMD for total hip (p = 0.02) and lumbar spine (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Measurement of pre-treatment BTM levels predicts osteoporosis patients' response to antiresorptive treatment. Patients with high pre-treatment levels of CTX and/or PINP benefit more from antiresorptive treatment with larger increases in BMD than patients with lower pre-treatment levels.

Potential impact of mepolizumab in stepping down anti-osteporotic treatment in corticosteroid-dependent asthma.

Oral corticosteroids (OCS) are commonly used for the acute management of severe asthma exacerbations or as maintenance therapy; however, chronic use is associated with significant toxicities, e.g., osteoporosis. In the REal worlD Effectiveness and Safety (REDES) study of mepolizumab in a multicentric Spanish cohort of asthma patients, mepolizumab effectively reduced clinically severe asthma exacerbations and decreased OCS dependence. This post-hoc analysis further evaluates mepolizumab's de-escalation effect on OCS dose. Patients enrolled in REDES who had OCS consumption data available for 12 months pre- and post-mepolizumab treatment were included in this analysis. Primary outcomes were to determine the change in the proportion of patients eligible for anti-osteoporotic treatment due to the changes in OCS consumption before and after 1 year of mepolizumab treatment. All analyses are descriptive. Approximately one-third (98/318; 30.8%) of patients in REDES were on maintenance OCS at the time of mepolizumab treatment initiation. In REDES, mean cumulative OCS exposure decreased by 54.3% after 1 year of treatment. The proportion of patients on high-dose OCS (≥7.5 mg/day) fell from 57.1% at baseline to 28.9% after 12 months of mepolizumab treatment. Thus, 53.6% of OCS-dependent asthma patients treated with mepolizumab would cease to be candidates for anti-osteoporotic treatment according to guidelines thresholds.

Bad to the Bone: The Effects of Therapeutic Glucocorticoids on Osteoblasts and Osteocytes.

Despite the continued development of specialized immunosuppressive therapies in the form of monoclonal antibodies, glucocorticoids remain a mainstay in the treatment of rheumatological and auto-inflammatory disorders. Therapeutic glucocorticoids are unmatched in the breadth of their immunosuppressive properties and deliver their anti-inflammatory effects at unparalleled speed. However, long-term exposure to therapeutic doses of glucocorticoids decreases bone mass and increases the risk of fractures - particularly in the spine - thus limiting their clinical use. Due to the abundant expression of glucocorticoid receptors across all skeletal cell populations and their respective progenitors, therapeutic glucocorticoids affect skeletal quality through a plethora of cellular targets and molecular mechanisms. However, recent evidence from rodent studies, supported by clinical data, highlights the considerable role of cells of the osteoblast lineage in the pathogenesis of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: it is now appreciated that cells of the osteoblast lineage are key targets of therapeutic glucocorticoids and have an outsized role in mediating their undesirable skeletal effects. As part of this article, we review the molecular mechanisms underpinning the detrimental effects of supraphysiological levels of glucocorticoids on cells of the osteoblast lineage including osteocytes and highlight the clinical implications of recent discoveries in the field.

Corrigendum: When to Start and Stop Bone-Protecting Medication for Preventing Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.782118.].

Effects of anti-resorptive treatment on the material properties of individual canine trabeculae in cyclic tensile tests.

Osteoporosis is defined as a decrease of bone mass and strength, as well as an increase in fracture risk. It is conventionally treated with antiresorptive drugs, such as bisphosphonates (BPs) and selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs). Although both drug types successfully decrease the risk of bone fractures, their effect on bone mass and strength is different. For instance, BP treatment causes an increase of bone mass, stiffness and strength of whole bones, whereas SERM treatment causes only small (4%) increases of bone mass, but increased bone toughness. Such improved mechanical behavior of whole bones can be potentially related to the bone mass, bone structure or material changes. While bone mass and architecture have already been investigated previously, little is known about the mechanical behavior at the tissue/material level, especially of trabecular bone. As such, the goal of the work presented here was to fill this gap by performing cyclic tensile tests in a wet, close to physiologic environment of individual trabeculae retrieved from the vertebrae of beagle dogs treated with alendronate (a BP), raloxifene (a SERM) or without treatments. Identification of material properties was performed with a previously developed rheological model and of mechanical properties via fitting of envelope curves. Additionally, tissue mineral density (TMD) and microdamage formation were analyzed. Alendronate treatment resulted in a higher trabecular tissue stiffness and strength, associated with higher levels of TMD. In contrast, raloxifene treatment caused a higher trabecular toughness, pre-dominantly in the post-yield region. Microdamage formation during testing was not affected by either anti-resorptive treatment regimens. These findings highlight that the improved mechanical behavior of whole bones after anti-resorptive treatment is at least partly caused by improved material properties, with different mechanisms for alendronate and raloxifene. This study further shows the power of performing a mechanical characterization of trabecular bone at the level of individual trabeculae for better understanding of clinically relevant mechanical behavior of bone.

When to Start and Stop Bone-Protecting Medication for Preventing Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis.

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) leads to fractures in up to 40% of patients with chronic glucocorticoid (GC) therapy when left untreated. GCs rapidly increase fracture risk, and thus many patients with anticipated chronic GC exposures should start anti-osteoporosis pharmacotherapy to prevent fractures. In addition to low awareness of the need for anti-osteoporosis therapy among clinicians treating patients with GCs, a major barrier to prevention of fractures from GIOP is a lack of clear guideline recommendations on when to start and stop anti-osteoporosis treatment in patients with GC use. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize current evidence and provide considerations for the duration of anti-osteoporosis treatment in patients taking GCs based on pre-clinical, clinical, epidemiologic, and pharmacologic evidence. We review the pathophysiology of GIOP, outline current guideline recommendations on initiating and stopping anti-osteoporosis therapy for GIOP, and present considerations for the duration of anti-osteoporosis treatment based on existing evidence. In each section, we illustrate major points through a patient case example. Finally, we conclude with proposed areas for future research and emerging areas of interest related to GIOP clinical management.

Treatment of pathologic fractures of the mandible in stage III medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw-an observational study.

PURPOSE: The treatment of pathologic fractures in stage III medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) remains challenging. The treatment in the literature is controversial, varying from extensive and aggressive surgery with resections and musculocutaneous free flap reconstruction to conservative treatment with only mouth rinses and/or antimicrobial treatment. The purpose of this study was to analyse the results of the treatment protocol in the Leiden University Medical Center in the Netherlands. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2003 and 2017, a total of 15 consecutive patients were seen with pathologic fractures in stage III MRONJ. Patient characteristics and treatment were studied. RESULTS: Seven patients were dentate, and were all surgically treated according to protocol, with 3 additionally undergoing intermaxillary fixation. Eight patients were edentulous of whom 6 were surgically treated: 2 with osteosynthesis and the rest with a soft diet post-operatively for several weeks. One patient showed healing in a later stage and was not treated. Two patients were treated with antimicrobial treatment and a soft diet. Eleven patients (73%) showed complete healing of the fracture or a pseudarthrosis and were free of complaints and able to function. CONCLUSION: These results show that a relatively simple (surgical and/or antimicrobial) approach, combined with intermaxillary fixation on occasion, can lead to consolidation and/or a pseudarthrosis with a remaining and acceptable function of the jaw.

µCT-based, in vivo dynamic bone histomorphometry allows 3D evaluation of the early responses of bone resorption and formation to PTH and alendronate combination therapy.

Current osteoporosis treatments improve bone mass by increasing net bone formation: anti-resorptive drugs such as bisphosphonates block osteoclast activity, while anabolic agents such as parathyroid hormone (PTH) increase bone remodeling, with a greater effect on formation. Although these drugs are widely used, their role in modulating formation and resorption is not fully understood, due in part to technical limitations in the ability to longitudinally assess bone remodeling. Importantly, it is not known whether or not PTH-induced bone formation is independent of resorption, resulting in controversy over the effectiveness of combination therapies that use both PTH and an anti-resorptive. In this study, we developed a µCT-based, in vivo dynamic bone histomorphometry technique for rat tibiae, and applied this method to longitudinally track changes in bone resorption and formation as a result of treatment with alendronate (ALN), PTH, or combination therapy of both PTH and ALN (PTH+ALN). Correlations between our µCT-based measures of bone formation and measures of bone formation based on calcein-labeled histology (r=0.72-0.83) confirm the accuracy of this method. Bone remodeling parameters measured through µCT-based in vivo dynamic bone histomorphometry indicate an increased rate of bone formation in rats treated with PTH and PTH+ALN, together with a decrease in bone resorption measures in rats treated with ALN and PTH+ALN. These results were further supported by traditional histology-based measurements, suggesting that PTH was able to induce bone formation while bone resorption was suppressed.

A closer look at the immediate trabecula response to combined parathyroid hormone and alendronate treatment.

Daily injections of parathyroid hormone (PTH) are the only FDA-approved anabolic treatment for osteoporosis; however PTH is only clinically approved for treatment periods of up to 24months. To enhance its anabolic effect, combining PTH with anti-resorptive therapy was proposed and expected to maximize the effectiveness of PTH. The current study aimed to elucidate structural mechanisms through which combination therapy can further improve bone strength over a limited treatment window of 12days, to more closely examine the early phase of the anabolic window. We examined 30 female rats treated with either vehicle (Veh), alendronate (ALN), PTH, or both PTH and ALN (PTH+ALN). Standard and individual trabecula segmentation (ITS)-based microstructural analyses were performed using in vivo micro-computed tomography. We found an increase in BV/TV in all treatments with the highest in the PTH+ALN group. Tb.Th* increased in both PTH and PTH+ALN groups well beyond that of the Veh or ALN group. SMI decreased in all treatments with PTH+ALN having the greatest tendency toward plate-like structures. ITS confirmed the trend toward more plate-like structures with increased plate Tb.N* and increased plate-to-rod ratio that was most pronounced in the PTH+ALN group. Using image-based finite element analysis, we demonstrated that stiffness increased in all treatment groups, again with the largest increase in the PTH+ALN group, indicating the resulting structural implications of increased plate-like structure. Static and dynamic bone histomorphometry and a serum resorption marker confirmed that PTH+ALN significantly increased bone formation activities and suppressed bone resorption activities. Overall the results indicate that PTH+ALN treatment has an additive effect due to a preferential increase in plate-like structures.