Real-Life Adherence to Venom Immunotherapy and Adrenaline Autoinjector.

INTRODUCTION: Venom immunotherapy (VIT) and adrenaline autoinjector (AAI) are important therapies in venom anaphylaxis. Adherence to VIT and AAI in patients with venom allergy has been evaluated in a few studies; however, solid data are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate VIT and AAI retrieval rates in patients with venom allergy with a special focus on adherence to treatment. Adherence was compared to subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) with inhalant allergens. METHODS: This was a retrospective study among patients registered for allergen immunotherapy at the Allergy Center, Odense University Hospital, Denmark, from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2014. Data on purchased immunotherapy and AAI were obtained from the Danish National Health Service Prescription Database. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze if allergen, age, sex, mastocytosis, and treatment site affected adherence. RESULTS: The 3-year adherence to VIT was 92.4% (244/264) compared to 87.4% (215/246) in SCIT with inhalant allergens, and the 5-year adherence to VIT was 84.1% (222/264) compared to 74.8% (184/246) in SCIT with inhalant allergens (p = 0.045). Females treated with VIT were more adherent than males (p = 0.45 [3-year], p = 0.008 [5-year]), whereas allergen, age, mastocytosis, or treatment site did not significantly affect adherence. Only 28.6% of patients (12/42) purchased an AAI after premature termination of VIT. CONCLUSION: In this register-based study, we found that the 3- and 5-year adherences to VIT and SCIT with inhalant allergens are at the upper end of the spectrum hitherto reported. Patients' 5-year adherence to VIT was higher than patients' 5-year adherence to SCIT with inhalant allergens. If VIT was prematurely terminated, less than 1/3 would have purchased an AAI.

Efficacy and safety of ongericimab given by prefilled syringe or autoinjector in primary hypercholesterolemia and mixed hyperlipidemia.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Limited evidence exist regarding the association between ongericimab, a novel recombinant humanized anti-PCSK9 monoclonal antibody, and primary hypercholesterolemia and mixed dyslipidemia. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ongericimab administered by prefilled syringe (PFS) or autoinjector (AI) in Chinese patients with primary hypercholesterolemia and mixed dyslipidemia on stable optimized lipid-lowering therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 255 patients on stable optimized lipid-lowering therapy were randomized in a 2:1:2:1 ratio to receive PFS for the subcutaneous injection of ongericimab 150 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) or a matching placebo, or AI for the subcutaneous injection of ongericimab 150 mg Q2W or a matching placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was the percent change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels from baseline to week 12. Safety was also evaluated. At week 12, the least squares mean percent changes were -72.7% (3.9%) for PFS and -71.1% (3.8%) for AI (all P < 0.001) compared to respective matching placebo groups. Beneficial effects were also seen for all secondary lipid parameters, notably with robust reduction in Lp (a). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious AEs with ongericimab were reported in 46.2% and 2.4% of patients, compared to 44.2% and 3.5% with placebo. CONCLUSION: In Chinese patients with primary hypercholesterolemia and mixed dyslipidemia, a 12-week treatment regimen with ongericimab administered by PFS or AI significantly reduced LDL-C and other lipid parameters, proving to be safe and well tolerated. Patients experienced consistent effects from PFS or AI devices. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: CTR20220027; January 11, 2022; http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/index.html.

Evaluation of the origin and educational quality of youtube videos on adrenaline auto-injectors.

Summary: Background. Guidelines highlight the pivotal role of adrenaline auto-injector (AAI) training. However, the standards of visual training platforms has not been determined. Our aim was to evaluate the reliability and quality of the AAI related videos on YouTube. Methods. After a search on YouTube about AAI, all videos were categorized into groups based on their origin and the aim of the content. The quality, reliability, understandibility, and actionability of the videos were evaluated using the Global Quality Scale (GQS), Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool Audovisiual (PEMAT-A/V), Quality Criteria for Consumer Health Information (DISCERN), and a modified DISCERN. In each video, the application steps of AAI were evaluated according to a scale of correct usage. Results. 107 YouTube videos in English were included. No significant difference in terms of views, likes, duration and uploading time was observed between the health and non-health groups whereas the GQS (p=0.001), DISCERN (total: p=0.02, and overall: p=0.094), modified DISCERN (p=0.001) scores were higher in the health group. It was found that scores tended to be higher in educational videos. AAI use was mentioned in 85% videos. The median number of mentioned steps was 6. Conclusions. YouTube is an effective platform for visual learning for the use of AAIs. Although the visibility of the videos is equal independent of the origin, the ones recorded by medical professionals seem to provide the most qualified and reliable information.

[PRACTICE AND TRAINING RELATED TO USING ADRENALINE AUTOINJECTORS FOR PARAMEDICS: FACTS AND ISSUES].

BACKGROUND: Although paramedics can use adrenaline autoinjectors (AAIs) during their duties, the actual conditions of their use and the challenges faced remain unclear. We investigated the actual situation and issues pertaining to creating an environment in which paramedics can operate AAIs more effectively. METHODS: A web-based survey was conducted among paramedics who participated in a web-based training session related to their latest knowledge on food allergies and emergency responses in 2022. The survey items included practice and training environments, practices of AAI administration, and regarding AAI administration. RESULTS: Seventy paramedics responded to the survey. Twenty-eight respondents (40%) had experienced cases in which they wished they had an AAI in their work to date, but only one had actually administered one. Thirty-four (49%) indicated that it would be good to have an AAI in the ambulance at all times; 48 (69%) were not concerned about the use of AAI, and the level of concern about its use was significantly related to length of service. The study also revealed that paramedics do not have an adequate training environment regarding AAI. CONCLUSION: Few paramedics have experience in administering AAI, although they are aware of the need for it. For more effective use of AAI, it is necessary to establish a training environment to familiarize paramedics with anaphylaxis and an environment that enables them to use AAI promptly in the field.

[EPIPEN INSTRUCTIONS FOR ANAPHYLAXIS PATIENTS DURING DISPENSING: FACTORS RELATED TO THE QUALITY OF PHARMACISTS' INSTRUCTIONS].

BACKGROUND AND AIM: We previously reported that pharmacists working in pharmacies don't have enough knowledge and enough experience teaching anaphylaxis (An) and EpiPen use. We administered a questionnaire survey to pharmacists with experience handling EpiPen prescriptions. We investigated the relationship between the questionnaire results and the factors in the pharmacists' background regarding the explanation and guidance to patients. RESULTS: The percentage of pharmacists working in pharmacies who provided guidance using visual information and demonstrations was insufficient. Moreover, this figure decreased after the second guidance session. Objective confirmation of patient understanding was also insufficient. The results indicated that self-examination and participation in drug information sessions were important background factors for pharmacists who provided detailed guidance to patients. DISCUSSION: For appropriate long-term management of their condition, An patients must master the EpiPen technique. Pharmacists' guidance plays a critical role in this regard. A support system should be established for proper instruction of pharmacy patients by improving pharmacists' self-education and other educational opportunities.

Optimal dose of adrenaline auto-injector for children and young people at risk of anaphylaxis: A phase IV randomized controlled crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend intramuscular injection of 500 µg adrenaline (epinephrine) for anaphylaxis in teenagers and adults; however, most autoinjectors deliver a maximum 300 µg dose. We evaluated plasma adrenaline levels and cardiovascular parameters (including cardiac output) following self-injection with 300 µg or 500 µg adrenaline in teenagers at risk of anaphylaxis. METHODS: Subjects were recruited to a randomized, single-blind two period crossover trial. Participants received all 3 injections (Emerade® 500 µg, Emerade® 300 µg, Epipen® 0.3 mg) on 2 separate visits (allocated in a randomized block design), at least 28 days apart. Intramuscular injection was confirmed by ultrasound, and heart rate/stroke volume assessed using continuous monitoring. The trial was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03366298). RESULTS: Twelve participants (58% male, median 15.4 years) participated; all completed the study. 500 µg injection resulted in a higher and more prolonged peak concentration (p = 0.01) and greater Area-Under-Curve for plasma adrenaline (p < 0.05) compared to 300 µg, with no difference in adverse events. Adrenaline caused a significant increase in heart rate irrespective of dose and device. Unexpectedly, 300 µg adrenaline resulted in a significant increase in stroke volume when delivered with Emerade®, but a negative inotropic effect with Epipen® (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These data support a 500 µg dose of adrenaline to treat anaphylaxis in individuals >40 kg in the community. The contrasting effects on stroke volume between Epipen® and Emerade®, despite similar peak plasma adrenaline levels, are unexpected. There is an urgent need to better understand differences in pharmacodynamics following adrenaline administration by autoinjector. In the meantime, we recommend adrenaline injection by needle/syringe in the healthcare setting in individuals with anaphylaxis refractory to initial treatment.

Bioavailability and cardiovascular effects of adrenaline administered by Anapen 500 µg auto-injector in healthy volunteers.

AIMS: Anaphylaxis guidelines recommend intramuscular adrenaline, commonly 300 µg administered using an auto-injector device. However, overweight/obese patients may require a higher adrenaline dose for adequate cardiovascular (CV) response. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) CV profiles after a single 500 µg adrenaline injection via Anapen auto-injector in healthy normal weight males and otherwise healthy, overweight or obese females. METHODS: In this exploratory open-label, single-centre study, 54 healthy volunteers aged 18-50 years received a single 500 µg adrenaline injection (Anapen auto-injector) in the thigh (antero-lateral middle third [18 males] or antero-inferior third [36 females]). Assessments included depot depth (ultrasonography), plasma adrenaline levels (liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry) and heart rate (HR; ECG Holter monitor). RESULTS: Ultrasonography showed that 82.4% of normal weight males received intramuscular injections; all overweight and obese females received subcutaneous injections. Anapen injection produced rapid increases in circulating adrenaline levels and significant increases in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and HR. Second peak plasma adrenaline concentrations (Cmax2 ) were reduced, and time to Cmax2 increased in overweight and obese females compared with males with normal body mass index; area under the curve (0-240 min) (AUC(0-240) ) was increased in overweight and obese females. Obese females had reduced maximal SBP values compared with normal weight males or overweight females; overweight and obese females had markedly different HR time courses compared with normal weight males. CONCLUSION: A 500 µg adrenaline injection via Anapen produced rapid PK/PD changes in normal weight, overweight and obese subjects, irrespective of intramuscular or subcutaneous injection, and was well tolerated.

Analysis of adrenaline autoinjectors acquisition in Portugal over 15 years.

Summary: Background. The adrenaline autoinjector (AAi) is universally recommended as the first-line treatment for anaphylactic reactions occurring outside the medical setting. The quantification of its acquisition may help estimate the prevalence of patients at risk of anaphylaxis with an indication for AAi. Objective. Evaluation of the global and regional frequency of AAi purchases in Mainland Portugal between 2003-2017 and calculate the inherent costs in 2017. Methods. AAi acquisition distribution analysis along this period. The population was divided in two age groups according to the adrenaline dosage. Results. A total of 10,993 AAi units of 0.15mg/0.3mL and 28,619 of 0.3mg/0.3mL were acquired in these 15 years, with an annual average of 733 and 1908 units, respectively. In cumulative values terms, Lisbon showed the highest number of AAI acquired and higher prevalence per region/100,000 inhabitants in both groups. In 2017, the annual cost for each age group was 64,202.71 € 187,447.70 € for patients and € 37,706.35 / 110,113.30 € for the National Health System. Conclusions. In the last 15 years, there was a progressive increase in AAi acquisition. We estimate a rate of anaphylaxis occurrence in Portugal according to AAi aquisition of 0.165%.

Retrieval of Additional Doses of Epinephrine From the New Teva Epinephrine Autoinjector Pen.

Epinephrine autoinjectors are commonly used in urban environments for anaphylaxis. In remote environments, the effects of a single dose of epinephrine may diminish before one can access higher medical care. By retrieving additional epinephrine from common autoinjectors, a medical provider may be able to treat or delay decompensation of anaphylaxis in the field during evacuation. The new Teva epinephrine autoinjectors were obtained. The design of the mechanism was researched by studying patents and disassembling trainers and medication-containing autoinjectors. Multiple methods of access were tried to find the quickest, most reliable method that required minimal tools or equipment. A quick, reliable method of removing the injection syringe from the autoinjector using a knife was determined, as outlined in this article. The syringe plunger had a security design to prevent dispensing further doses from the syringe, so a long narrow object is also required to dispense additional doses. There are 4 additional doses of approximately 0.3-mg epinephrine in these Teva autoinjectors. Prior knowledge of epinephrine equipment and the devices that may be encountered in the field is important for providing life-saving medical care. The ability to retrieve additional doses of epinephrine from a used autoinjector can provide additional life-saving medication while evacuating to a higher level of medical care. This method does carry risks to rescuers and patients; however, it can potentially be life saving.

Anaphylaxis in Brazil between 2011 and 2019.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of population-based studies of anaphylaxis from low- and middle-income countries. This hampers public health planning and investments and may influence availability of adrenaline auto-injectors. OBJECTIVE: We conducted the first national population-based study of anaphylaxis hospitalization in Brazil. METHODS: Descriptive study using routinely reported data to the Brazilian Hospital Information System for the years 2011-2019. Information available is coded based on the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 and covers main cause of hospitalization (primary cause) and any conditions contributing to it (secondary cause). RESULTS: Over 9 years, we identified 5716 admissions due to anaphylaxis for all causes. The average hospitalization rate related to anaphylaxis was 0.71/100,000 population per year, with a 2.4% (95% CI 1.9%, 2.9%) increase per annum over the study period. Admissions were more frequent among females (52.8%), except for cases due to insect sting. Most admissions occurred in adulthood, from 30 to 59 years (36.3%) but 13.8% in preschool children (0-4 years). There were more young children admitted for food-related anaphylaxis, and more adults admitted for drug/iatrogenic-related anaphylaxis. There were 334 cases (5.8% of admissions) of fatal anaphylaxis over the study period, with increased case fatality rate over time. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This is the first study of anaphylaxis hospital admissions using nation-wide data from a low- or middle-income country. Hospital admissions and fatalities from anaphylaxis in Brazil appear to be increasing.

Risk factors for systemic reactions in typical cold urticaria: Results from the COLD-CE study.

BACKGROUND: Cold urticaria (ColdU), that is, the occurrence of wheals or angioedema in response to cold exposure, is classified into typical and atypical forms. The diagnosis of typical ColdU relies on whealing in response to local cold stimulation testing (CST). It can also manifest with cold-induced anaphylaxis (ColdA). We aimed to determine risk factors for ColdA in typical ColdU. METHODS: An international, cross-sectional study COLD-CE was carried out at 32 urticaria centers of reference and excellence (UCAREs). Detailed history was taken and CST with an ice cube and/or TempTest® performed. ColdA was defined as an acute cold-induced involvement of the skin and/or visible mucosal tissue and at least one of: cardiovascular manifestations, difficulty breathing, or gastrointestinal symptoms. RESULTS: Of 551 ColdU patients, 75% (n = 412) had a positive CST and ColdA occurred in 37% (n = 151) of the latter. Cold-induced generalized wheals, angioedema, acral swelling, oropharyngeal/laryngeal symptoms, and itch of earlobes were identified as signs/symptoms of severe disease. ColdA was most commonly provoked by complete cold water immersion and ColdA caused by cold air was more common in countries with a warmer climate. Ten percent (n = 40) of typical ColdU patients had a concomitant chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). They had a lower frequency of ColdA than those without CSU (4% vs. 39%, p = .003). We identified the following risk factors for cardiovascular manifestations: previous systemic reaction to a Hymenoptera sting, angioedema, oropharyngeal/laryngeal symptoms, and itchy earlobes. CONCLUSION: ColdA is common in typical ColdU. High-risk patients require education about their condition and how to use an adrenaline autoinjector.

Food-Induced Anaphylaxis among Children Weighing <15 kg: A Single-Center Case Series of the Pediatric Emergency Department.

INTRODUCTION: Food-induced anaphylaxis among infants shows an increasing prevalence; however, the prescription of epinephrine auto-injectors (EAIs) for children weighing <15 kg is associated with issues of the needle length and the epinephrine dose. Several studies have shown age-related differences in food-induced anaphylaxis, although little is known about the weight-related differences in food-induced anaphylaxis. This study aimed to reveal the incidence, clinical characteristics, and management of food-induced anaphylaxis in children weighing <15 kg. METHODS: This chart review included children who visited the pediatric emergency department (ED) of the National Center for Child Health and Development (Tokyo, Japan) from January 2014 to December 2016 and were diagnosed with food-induced anaphylaxis. The severity of anaphylaxis was evaluated using the Sampson Grading Scale. RESULTS: Of 89,232 ED visits, 444 visits included patients with food-induced anaphylaxis, after excluding cases of food-induced anaphylaxis related to oral desensitization therapy. The incidence was 4.98 per 1,000 visits. More than half of the children (n = 247/444, 55.6%) weighed <15 kg. The proportion of grade 3 and higher severity anaphylactic symptoms was 74.5% (184/247) in children weighing <15 kg and 79.2% (156/197) in children weighing 15 kg or more. The recurrence rate of food-induced anaphylaxis was 22.3% (55/247) in children weighing <15 kg and 48.7% (96/197) in children weighing 15 kg or more. Among the children weighing <15 kg, the proportion of those with recurrent food-induced anaphylaxis was 4 times higher in children weighing 10-15 kg than in those weighing <10 kg (32.2% [47/146] vs. 7.9% [8/101]). The proportion of patients who were prescribed EAIs before each visit was 25.5% (14/55) in children weighing <15 kg with a history of food-induced anaphylaxis. CONCLUSION: Food-induced anaphylaxis among children weighing <15 kg occurred as frequently and was as severe as that among children weighing 15 kg or more. However, the proportion of patients prescribed EAIs was very low in children weighing <15 kg with food-induced anaphylaxis. The potential need for EAIs is suggested among children weighing <15 kg, especially among children weighing 10 kg or more but <15 kg.

Rapid and sustained B-cell depletion with subcutaneous ofatumumab in relapsing multiple sclerosis: APLIOS, a randomized phase-2 study.

BACKGROUND: Ofatumumab, the first fully human anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, is approved in several countries for relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the bioequivalence of ofatumumab administered by an autoinjector versus a pre-filled syringe (PFS) and to explore the effect of ofatumumab on B-cell depletion. METHODS: APLIOS (NCT03560739) is a 12-week, open-label, parallel-group, phase-2 study in patients with RMS receiving subcutaneous ofatumumab 20 mg every 4 weeks (q4w) (from Week 4, after initial doses on Days 1, 7, and 14). Patients were randomized 10:10:1:1 to autoinjector or PFS in the abdomen, or autoinjector or PFS in the thigh, respectively. Bioequivalence was determined by area under the curve (AUCτ) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) for Weeks 8-12. B-cell depletion and safety/tolerability were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 256 patients contributed to the bioequivalence analyses (autoinjector-abdomen, n = 128; PFS-abdomen, n = 128). Abdominal ofatumumab pharmacokinetic exposure was bioequivalent for autoinjector and PFS (geometric mean AUCτ, 487.7 vs 474.1 h × µg/mL (ratio 1.03); Cmax, 1.409 vs 1.409 µg/mL (ratio 1.00)). B-cell counts (median cells/µL) depleted rapidly in all groups from 214.0 (baseline) to 2.0 (Day 14). Ofatumumab was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Ofatumumab 20 mg q4w self-administered subcutaneously via autoinjector is bioequivalent to PFS administration and provides rapid B-cell depletion.

Assessment of Cavitation Intensity in Accelerating Syringes of Spring-Driven Autoinjectors.

PURPOSE: Cavitation is an undesired phenomenon that may occur in certain types of autoinjectors (AIs). Cavitation happens because of rapid changes of pressure in a liquid, leading to the formation of small vapor-filled cavities, which upon collapsing, can generate an intense shock wave that may damage the device container and the protein drug molecules. Cavitation occurs in the AI because of the syringe-drug relative displacement as a result of the syringe's sudden acceleration during needle insertion and the ensuing pressure drop at the bottom of the container. Therefore, it's crucial to analyze the potential effect of cavitation on AI. The goal of the current study is to investigate the effects of syringe and AI design parameters such as air gap size, syringe filling volume, fluid viscosity, and drive spring force (syringe acceleration) on the risk and severity of cavitation. METHODS: A model autoinjector platform is built to record the syringe and cavitation dynamics which we use to estimate the cavitation intensity in terms of extension rate and to study the effects of design parameters on the severity of cavitation. RESULTS: Our results show the generation of an intense shock wave and a high extension rate upon cavitation collapse. The induced extension rate increases with syringe acceleration and filling volume and decreases with viscosity and air gap size. CONCLUSION: The most severe cavitation occurred in an AI device with the larger drive spring force and the syringe of a smaller air gap size filled with a less viscous fluid and a larger filling volume.

Secukinumab demonstrates efficacy, safety, and tolerability upon administration by 2 ml autoinjector in adult patients with plaque psoriasis: 52-week results from MATURE, a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Convenient administration is an important factor for treatment adherence in patients with psoriasis. MATURE study reports the efficacy, safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PKs) of secukinumab 300 mg 2 ml autoinjector (AI) from MATURE trial (NCT03589885). Eligible patients were randomized to secukinumab 300 mg 2 ml AI or 2× 1 ml prefilled syringe (PFS) or placebo. The co-primary endpoints were psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) 75 and investigator's global assessment (IGA) 0/1 response rates at Week 12 versus placebo. Other endpoints included PASI90/100 response, dermatology life quality index (DLQI) 0/1, PKs, 2 ml AI usability rated using self-injection assessment questionnaire (SIAQ), and safety. The study met both co-primary and secondary endpoints (p < 0.0001). Secukinumab 300 mg 2 ml AI and 2× 1 ml PFS treatments led to superior PASI75/90/100 (2 ml AI: 95.1%/75.6%/43.9%; 2× 1 mL PFS: 83.2%/62.6%/37.5% and placebo: 10%/5.0%/0.0%, respectively), IGA, and DLQI 0/1 responses compared with placebo, and efficacy was sustained through 52 weeks. SIAQ results showed high usability of self-injection with 2 mL AI device. No new safety signals were observed. Study design may bias the interpretation of safety profile after Week 12, due to different exposure of secukinumab versus placebo. Secukinumab 300 mg administered with the 2 mL AI demonstrated superior efficacy over placebo, good tolerability, and convenient administration.

Anaphylaxis and onsite treatment in schools, kindergartens, and nurseries.

BACKGROUND: There have been no reports on both anaphylaxis incidence rate in schools, kindergarten, and nurseries, or how teachers have treated these children. This study was a fact-finding survey aimed at determining if appropriate responses to anaphylaxis onset were implemented in Oita Prefecture, Japan. METHODS: The Oita Prefectural Allergy Control Committee administered a questionnaire using Google forms to all public and private schools, public and private kindergartens, certified child-care facilities, and day-care centers in the prefecture. RESULTS: Responses to the questionnaire were obtained from 597 institutions, of which 125 890 children were affiliated with the responding institutions. Forty-eight children developed symptoms for which an adrenaline auto-injector was recommended in an Oita guideline. Among these children, three used the adrenaline auto-injector, three were prescribed the adrenaline auto-injector but were unable to use it, 27 were unable to use it as they were not prescribed an adrenaline auto-injector, and the final 15 responded that they handled their symptoms via another method because none of the above options apply. CONCLUSIONS: Most children who developed symptoms which an adrenaline auto-injector was recommended had no prescription for an adrenaline auto-injector. There is thus a need for appropriate response training to anaphylaxis whether or not an adrenaline auto-injector was prescribed.

Use of machine learning to identify patients at risk of sub-optimal adherence: study based on real-world data from 10,929 children using a connected auto-injector device.

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to develop a machine learning model, using real-world data captured from a connected auto-injector device and from early indicators from the first 3 months of treatment, to predict sub-optimal adherence to recombinant human growth hormone (r-hGH) in patients with growth disorders. METHODS: Adherence to r-hGH treatment was assessed in children (aged < 18 years) who started using a connected auto-injector device (easypod™), and transmitted injection data for ≥ 12 months. Adherence in the following 3, 6, or 9 months after treatment start was categorized as optimal (≥ 85%) versus sub-optimal (< 85%). Logistic regression and tree-based models were applied. RESULTS: Data from 10,929 children showed that a random forest model with mean and standard deviation of adherence over the first 3 months, infrequent transmission of data, not changing certain comfort settings, and starting treatment at an older age was important in predicting the risk of sub-optimal adherence in the following 3, 6, or 9 months. Sensitivities ranged between 0.72 and 0.77, and specificities between 0.80 and 0.81. CONCLUSIONS: To the authors' knowledge, this is the first attempt to integrate a machine learning model into a digital health ecosystem to help healthcare providers to identify patients at risk of sub-optimal adherence to r-hGH in the following 3, 6, or 9 months. This information, together with patient-specific indicators of sub-optimal adherence, can be used to provide support to at-risk patients and their caregivers to achieve optimal adherence and, subsequently, improve clinical outcomes.

Benefit of educational intervention on Autoinjector Technique for caregivers and paediatric patients with food allergies: A literature review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The incidence of food allergy among children is on the rise. Children who are diagnosed with a food allergy receive long-term treatment for allergy management from allergy specialists, nurses and dieticians. This management may include the prescription of an adrenaline autoinjector (AAI) if the child is at risk of a severe allergic reaction (anaphylaxis). Therefore, it is important that parents of children with allergies are trained in the recognition of anaphylaxis and in the correct administration of an AAI. However, many parents are unable to correctly administer an AAI when assessed. The aim of this study is to review the current literature on caregiver's and paediatric patients' ability to use an AAI. METHODOLOGY: An electronic search to evaluate AAI technique in caregivers and children with food allergy was conducted. A total of 323 articles were screened in which 10 studies were reviewed. RESULTS: Seventy-eight percent of parents who had never been trained in the use of an AAI were unable to trigger it. In studies where paediatric patients' ability to use an AAI was assessed, a mean score of 7.78/9 was derived for AAI knowledge among adolescents. CONCLUSION: Caregivers and patient's ability to use an AAI was inconclusive, and further research should address the validation of an assessment tool for AAI use. A significant improvement in AAI use was found after an educational intervention. This highlights the need for improved education for allergic individuals and their caregivers, and further study should explore what are the best educational methods to meet these needs.

Use of multiple epinephrine doses in anaphylaxis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Regulatory bodies recommend that all patients at risk of anaphylaxis be prescribed 2 epinephrine autoinjectors, which they should carry at all times. This is in contrast to some guidelines. The proportion of anaphylaxis reactions that are treated with multiple doses of epinephrine has not been systematically evaluated. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies reporting epinephrine treatment for anaphylaxis in which data relating to the number of doses administered were available. METHODS: We searched the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases for relevant studies reporting at least 10 anaphylaxis events (due to food or venom) from 1946 until January 2020. Data were extracted in duplicate for the meta-analysis, and the risk of bias was assessed. The study was registered under the PROSPERO identifier CRD42017069109. RESULTS: A total of 86 studies (36,557 anaphylaxis events) met the inclusion criteria (20 of the studies [23%] were prospective studies; 64 [74%] reported reactions in the community, and 22 [26%] included food challenge data). Risk of bias was assessed as low in 50 studies. Overall, 7.7% of anaphylaxis events from any cause (95% CI = 6.4-9.1) were treated with multiple doses of epinephrine. When only epinephrine-treated reactions for which subsequent doses were administered by a health care professional were considered, 11.1% of food-induced reactions (95% CI = 9.4-13.2) and 17.1% of venom-induced reactions (95% CI = 11.3-25.0) were treated with more than 1 epinephrine dose. Heterogeneity was moderate to high in the meta-analyses, but at sensitivity analysis this estimate was not affected by study design or anaphylaxis definition. CONCLUSION: Around 1 in 10 anaphylaxis reactions are treated with more than 1 dose of epinephrine.

Wilderness Medical Society Clinical Practice Guidelines on Anaphylaxis.

The Wilderness Medical Society convened a panel to review the literature and develop evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on the treatment of anaphylaxis, with an emphasis on a field-based perspective. The review also included literature regarding the definition, epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and prevention of anaphylaxis. The increasing prevalence of food allergies in the United States raises concern for a corresponding rise in the incidence of anaphylaxis. Intramuscular epinephrine is the primary treatment for anaphylaxis and should be administered before adjunctive treatments such as antihistamines, corticosteroids, and inhaled ß agonists. For outdoor schools and organizations, selecting a method to administer epinephrine in the field is based on considerations of cost, safety, and first responder training, as well as federal guidelines and state-specific laws.