Birthing balls to decrease labor pain and peanut balls to decrease length of labor: what is the evidence?

Birthing balls and peanut balls have been used for decades by nurses and midwives as a nonpharmacologic adjunct to labor management based on anecdotal evidence. This article aimed to review the evidence regarding their safety and efficacy based on randomized controlled trials. Birthing balls are round exercise balls that a laboring individual can use for sitting, rocking, and pelvic rotation. The use of the birthing balls has been thought to increase maternal comfort and mimic upright positioning to widen the pelvic outlet for those laboring without an epidural. A recent meta-analysis showed that the use of the birthing ball in labor significantly reduces maternal pain in labor by 1.7 points on a standard visual analog scale of 1 to 10 (mean difference, -1.70 points; 95% confidence interval, -2.20 to -1.20). The use of the birthing ball does not significantly affect the mode of delivery or the rate of other obstetrical complications. This suggests that its use is safe and can offer subjective improvement in maternal pain experienced during labor. The peanut ball is a peanut-shaped plastic ball placed between the knees of a person laboring in the lateral recumbent position, a position common in those laboring with an epidural. Traditionally, its use has been thought to allow for bent-knee positioning that can mimic a squatting position and facilitate frequent and optimal position changes during labor. Data regarding the effects of the peanut ball are mixed. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis found that the use of the peanut ball compared with no peanut ball is associated with a significantly decreased first stage of labor (mean difference, -87.42 minutes; 95% confidence interval, -94.49 to -80.34) and an 11% higher relative risk of vaginal delivery (relative risk, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.22; n=669). The use of the peanut ball is not associated with increased incidences of obstetrical complications. As such, it is reasonable to offer to individuals in labor. There has been no reported risk of the use of either the birthing ball or the peanut ball. As such, both interventions can be offered to individuals in labor as an adjunct to labor management techniques based on moderate quality evidence.

Pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic options for pain relief during labor: an expert review.

Labor pain is among the most severe types of physical pain that women may experience during their lifetime. Thus, pain relief is an essential part of medical care during childbirth. Epidural analgesia is considered to be the most efficient method of pain relief during labor. Nevertheless, patient preferences, contraindications, limited availability, and technical failure may require the use of alternative pain reliving methods during labor including systemic pharmacologic agents, and nonpharmacologic methods. Nonpharmacologic methods for pain alleviation during vaginal birth have become popular over the years, either as a complement to pharmacologic agents or at times as the principal therapy. Methods such as relaxation techniques (ie, yoga, hypnosis, and music), manual techniques (ie, massage, reflexology, and shiatsu), acupuncture, birthing ball, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation are considered safe, although the evidence supporting their effectiveness for pain relief is not as robust as it is for pharmacologic agents. Systemic pharmacologic agents are mostly administered by inhalation (nitrous oxide) or through the parenteral route. These agents include opioids such as meperidine, nalbuphine, tramadol, butorphanol, morphine, and remifentanil, and non-opioid agents such as parenteral acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Systemic pharmacologic agents suggest a diverse armamentarium of medication for pain management during labor. Their efficacy in treating pain associated with labor varies, and some continue to be used even though they have not been proven effective for pain relief. In addition, the maternal and perinatal side effects differ markedly among these agents. There is a relative abundance of data regarding the effectiveness of analgesic drugs compared with epidural, but the data regarding comparisons among the different types of alternative analgesic agents are scarce, and there is no consistency regarding the drug of choice for women who do not receive epidural pain management. This review aims to present the available data regarding the effectiveness of the different methods of relieving pain during labor other than epidural. The data presented are mainly based on recent level I evidence regarding pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic methods for pain relief during labor.

Improving labour progression among women with epidural anesthesia following use of a birthing ball: a review of recent literature.

Epidural anaesthesia is an effective form of pain relief during vaginal deliveries. However, neuraxial anaesthesia may slow the progression of labour. The assumption that epidurals lead to increased caesarean sections is also a topic of current debate. A holistic approach with the use of a birthing ball has been advocated as a potential modality to decrease labouring times and, therefore, reduce progression to caesarean section. Birthing balls aim to increase pelvic outlet opening, which facilitates labouring. Our aim is to review recent literature pertaining to birthing balls and their role in improving quality and outcomes of vaginal deliveries in patients with epidurals.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on the subject? Epidural anaesthesia may slow the progression of labour. It has been hypothesised that slowing progression of labour is associated with increased rates of vacuum and forceps delivery. Most common clinical indication for caesarean section is failure to progress during labour. Birthing Balls have been shown to quicken the progression of labour, theoretically reducing caesarean sections with those with epidurals.What do the results of the study add? Several studies have demonstrated a reduced duration of first and second stage of labour among women with epidural anaesthesia, but the existing literature is limited, and interpretation of results may be restricted by generalizability and inherent study biases. The objective of this article is to review existing literature and highlight the potential clinical utility of birthing balls in current obstetric practice.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and further research? Use of birthing balls has been advocated to decrease labouring time and therefore reduce progression to caesarean section. Larger studies or meta-analysis would be required to confirm potential benefits of birthing ball use.

The Effect of Birthing Ball Exercises on Labor Pain and Labor Outcome Among Primigraviade Parturient Mothers at a Tertiary Care Hospital.

INTRODUCTION: Every woman has the right to respectful and empathetic care during childbirth that addresses her needs for pain management, and allows her the liberty to make it a memorable experience. This study aimed to assess the effect of birthing ball exercises on labor pain and labor outcome among primigravidae parturients at a tertiary care hospital. METHOD: A quasi-experimental design was used. A total of 60 primigravidae with 30 each in the control and experiment groups were selected by consecutive sampling. Primigravidae in the experiment group underwent two sessions of 20 minutes of birthing ball exercises at a subsequent gap of one hour during their active phase of labor (>4 cm cervical dilation). Primigravidae in the control group received routine standard care that included continuous observation and monitoring of vital signs and progress of labor. The visual analog scale (VAS) score was assessed in the transition phase (cervical dilation 8 cm to 10cm) and labor outcomes were assessed after delivery in both groups. RESULT: The experiment group had significantly better labor outcomes in terms of labor pain, cervical dilatation, and duration of labor compared to the primigravidae in the control group (p<0.05). In addition, the majority of mothers in the experiment group (86.7 %) underwent vaginal delivery with episiotomy compared to the control group (53.3%). Findings also revealed a statistically significant difference in the newborns of both groups regarding appearance, pulse, grimace, activity, and respiration (APGAR) score, crying immediately after birth, and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) at p<0.05. CONCLUSION: There are a variety of discomforts that a woman experiences during labor. Reducing these discomforts is an important part of good nursing care. Non-pharmacologic methods like birthing ball exercises help decrease these discomforts by reducing labor pain and improving maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Birthing ball for reducing labor pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: Multiple factors are thought to affect a woman's sensation of pain during the process of labor. Birthing balls are round exercise balls upon which a woman sits during labor and performs different movements such as rocking back and forth and pelvic rotation. Midwives and nurses have been using birthing balls (also known as Swiss balls) to increase maternal comfort, widen the pelvic outlet, and facilitate progression of labor for women laboring without an epidural. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials is to assess whether the use of the birthing ball in labor decreases maternal pain during labor. DATA SOURCES: Research was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, ClinicalTrial.gov, OVID and Cochrane Library as electronic databases. Randomized controlled trials were identified using the following search strategy: "birthing ball" OR "birth ball" OR "swiss ball" OR "exercise ball" AND labor from the inception of each database to June 2019. No restrictions for language or geographic location were applied. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Selection criteria included randomized trials of pregnant women with a singleton, cephalic fetus who were randomized to either birthing ball or control group (i.e. no birthing ball) for use in labor. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Seven trials with 533 pregnant women were included. 287 (53.8%) were randomized to the intervention group (birthing ball) and 246 (46.2%) were randomized to the control group (no birthing ball). All analyses were done using an intention-to-treat approach, evaluating women according to the treatment group to which they were randomly allocated in the original trials. The primary outcome was labor pain in the first stage of labor. The summary measures were reported as summary relative risk (RR) or as summary mean difference (MD) with 95% of confidence interval (CI) using the random-effects model of DerSimonian and Laird. RESULTS: Labor pain significantly decreased by 1.70 points in the birthing ball group compared to the control group (MD -1.70 points; 95% CI -2.20 to -1.20). Use of the birthing ball versus no birthing ball did not result in a significant difference in incidence of spontaneous vaginal delivery, operative vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery, or perineal lacerations. CONCLUSION: The birthing ball is an effective method of pain reduction during labor for women laboring without an epidural.

Birthing ball versus pethidine and haloperidol in satisfaction with childbirth. / Pelota de parto versus petidina y haloperidol en la satisfacción en el parto.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects on maternal satisfaction of the use of the birthing ball as a method of pain relief compared to the subcutaneous administration of pethidine (50mg) and haloperidol (2.5mg), during the latent phase of labour. METHOD: Randomised, unicentric, parallel and controlled clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Low-risk pregnant women hospitalised in a pathological pregnancy ward at the Gregorio Marañón University General Hospital (Madrid) due to prolonged pregnancy, premature rupture of membranes, or labour prodromes. INTERVENTION: once the patient's labour had become painful, a series of pre-established movements were implemented with a birthing ball in the intervention group, or pethidine and haloperidol were administered at the same dose subcutaneously. After the intervention and on the post-natal ward, satisfaction was measured with the Mackey Satisfaction Childbirth scale, validated in Spanish in 2016, in the first 48-72hours after delivery. ANALYSIS: group comparisons: Student's t for continuous variables and Chi-squared for categorical variables. Significance at p<0.05. RESULTS: The maternal satisfaction was significantly higher in the experimental group than in the comparison group, in all the domains of the scale: obstetrician (4.24/3.87), dilatation (4.02/3.35), second stage (4.27/3.67), newborn (4.72/4.43), accompaniment and comfort (4.78/4.44). There were, however, no statistically significant differences in the midwife subscale, although the scores were equally high (4.65/4.45). CONCLUSION: Using birthing balls during the latent phase of labour increases women's satisfaction with their labour process more than administering pethidine and haloperidol during this period.