Modification of carbapenemase inhibition test and comparison of its performance with NG-Test CARBA 5 for detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales.

AIMS: Adequately and accurately identifying carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) is vital for selecting appropriate antimicrobial therapy and implementing effective infection control measures. This study aims to optimize the phenotypic detection method of carbapenemase for routine diagnostics in clinical microbiology laboratories. METHODS AND RESULTS: Carbapenemase genes in 2665 non-duplicate CRE clinical strains collected from various regions of China were confirmed through whole-genome sequencing (WGS). The carbapenemase inhibition test (CIT) was conducted and interpreted using different methods and breakpoints, then compared with the NG-Test CARBA 5 for carbapenemase detection. The diagnostic performance of the CIT method was optimal when the carbapenemase types were determined by comparing the inhibition zone diameters of the imipenem disc with 3-aminophenylboronic acid (APB) plus ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) to those of the imipenem disc with either APB or EDTA alone, with a breakpoint of 4 mm. The overall sensitivities of the current CIT, the modified CIT, and NG-Test CARBA 5 were 91.4%, 94.9%, and 99.9%, respectively. For detecting isolates co-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) and metallo-ß-lactamases (MBLs), the modified CIT method had higher sensitivity than the current method (70.0% vs. 53.3%), though this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.063). The NG-Test CARBA 5 showed excellent performance for multi-carbapenemases diagnosis, with sensitivity and specificity of 97.1% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Optimizing and standardizing the CIT method for clinical use is necessary. It has certain advantages in diagnosing multi-carbapenemase and rare carbapenemase production. However, for identifying common carbapenemase types, the NG-Test CARBA 5 demonstrated superior performance.

Combined use of the modified Hodge test and carbapenemase inhibition test for detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and metallo-ß-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas spp.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the combined use of the modified Hodge test (MHT) and carbapenemase inhibition test (CIT) using phenylboronic acid (PBA) and EDTA to detect carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) and metallo-ß-lactamase (MBL)-producing Pseudomonas spp. METHODS: A total of 49 isolates of CPE (15 Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase [KPC], 5 Guiana extended-spectrum ß-lactamase [GES]-5, 9 New Delhi metallo-ß-lactamase [NDM]-1, 5 Verona integron-encoded metallo-ß-lactamase [VIM]-2, 3 imipenem-hydrolyzing ß-lactamase [IMP], and 12 oxacillinase [OXA]-48-like), 25 isolates of MBL-producing Pseudomonas spp. (14 VIM-2 and 11 IMP), and 35 carbapenemase-negative controls were included. The MHT was performed for all isolates as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Enhanced growth of the indicator strain was measured in mm with a ruler. The CIT was performed by directly dripping PBA and EDTA solutions onto carbapenem disks that were placed on Mueller-Hinton agar plates seeded with the test strain. RESULTS: Considering the results of the MHT with the ertapenem disk in Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas spp., the CIT with the meropenem disk in Enterobacteriaceae, and the imipenem disk in Pseudomonas spp., three combined disk tests, namely MHT-positive plus PBA-positive, EDTA-positive, and MHT-positive plus PBA-negative plus EDTA-negative, had excellent sensitivity and specificity for the detection of KPC- (100% sensitivity and 100% specificity), MBL- (94% sensitivity and 100% specificity), and OXA-48-like-producing isolates (100% sensitivity and 100% specificity), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Combined use of the MHT and CIT with PBA and EDTA, for the detection of CPE and MBL-producing Pseudomonas spp., is effective in detecting and characterizing carbapenemases in routine laboratories.