Headaches and facial pain attributed to SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim was to provide insights to the characteristics of headache in the context of COVID-19 on behalf of the Headache Scientific Panel and the Neuro-COVID-19 Task Force of the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) and the European Headache Federation (EHF). METHODS: Following the Delphi method the Task Force identified six relevant questions and then conducted a systematic literature review to provide evidence-based answers and suggest specific diagnostic criteria. RESULTS: No data for facial pain were identified in the literature search. (1) Headache incidence during acute COVID-19 varies considerably, with higher prevalence rates in prospective compared to retrospective studies (28.9%-74.6% vs. 6.5%-34.0%). (2) Acute COVID-19 headache is usually bilateral or holocranial and often moderate to severe with throbbing pain quality lasting 2-14 days after first signs of COVID-19; photo-phonophobia, nausea, anosmia and ageusia are common associated features; persistent headache shares similar clinical characteristics. (3) Acute COVID-19 headache is presumably caused by immune-mediated mechanisms that activate the trigeminovascular system. (4) Headache occurs in 13.3%-76.9% following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and occurs more often amongst women with a pre-existing primary headache; the risk of developing headache is higher with the adenoviral-vector-type vaccines than with other preparations. (5) Headache related to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is mostly bilateral, and throbbing, pressing, jolting or stabbing. (6) No studies have been conducted investigating the underlying mechanism of headache attributed to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. CONCLUSION: The results of this joint EAN/EHF initiative provide a framework for a better understanding of headache in the context of SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination.

Utility of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Chronic Daily Headache Prophylaxis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Management of chronic daily headaches (CDH) remains challenging due to the limited efficacy of standard prophylactic pharmacological measures. Several studies have reported that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can effectively treat chronic headaches. The objective was to determine the utility of rTMS for immediate post-treatment and sustained CDH prophylaxis. RECENT FINDINGS: All procedures were conducted per PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ProQuest databases were searched for controlled clinical trials that have tested the efficacy of rTMS on populations with CDH. DerSimonian-Laird random-effects meta-analyses were performed using the 'meta' package in R to examine the post- vs. pre-rTMS changes in standardized headache intensity and frequency compared to sham-control conditions. Thirteen trials were included with a combined study population of N = 538 patients with CDH (rTMS, N = 284; Sham, N = 254). Patients exposed to rTMS had significantly reduced standardized CDH intensity and frequency in the immediate post-treatment period (Hedges' g = -1.16 [-1.89, -0.43], p = 0.002 and Δ = -5.07 [-10.05, -0.11], p = 0.045 respectively). However, these effects were sustained marginally in the follow-up period (Hedges' g = -0.43 [-0.76, -0.09], p = 0.012 and Δ = -3.33 [-5.52, -1.14], p = 0.003). Significant between-study heterogeneity was observed, at least partially driven by variations in rTMS protocols. Despite the observed clinically meaningful and statistically significant benefits in the immediate post-treatment period, the prophylactic effects of rTMS on CDH do not seem to sustain with discontinuation. Thus, the cost-effectiveness of the routine use of rTMS for CDH prophylaxis remains questionable. REGISTRATION: Protocol preregistered in PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42021250100).

The effect of anesthetic blockade of greater occipital nerve during the withdrawal period of the medication overuse headache treatment.

Background and purpose:

Discontinua­tion of medication still remains a key element in the treatment of medication overuse headache (MOH), but there is no consensus on the withdrawal procedure. We aimed to share the promising results of anesthetic blockade of greater occipital nerve (GON), which can be an alternative to existing treatments during the early withdrawal period of MOH treatment.

This study was conducted using regular electronic medical records and headache diaries of patients diagnosed with MOH and treated with anesthetic GON blockade with 0.5% bupivacaine solution in a specia­lized headache outpatient clinic. A total of 86 patients who developed MOH while being followed up for chronic migraine were included in the study.

The treatment schemes for MOH are based on expert consensus and withdrawal strategies are the most challenging part of treatment. In our study, numerical rating scale for headache intensity, overused medication consumption per month, headache frequency (day/month) and the duration of each attack (hour/day) decreased significantly in the first month compared to pre-treatment (p < 0.01). 

Conclusion – Our study suggests that GON blockade can be used as a good alternative therapy in the treatment of MOH.

Update in the understanding of new daily persistent headache.

Background Accumulating evidence suggests various specific triggers may lead to new daily persistent headache (NDPH)-like presentations, suggesting that new daily persistent headache is a heterogenous syndrome, and challenging the concept that new daily persistent headache is a primary headache disorder.Method We searched the PubMed database up to August 2022 for keywords including persistent daily headache with both primary and secondary etiologies. We summarized the literature and provided a narrative review of the clinical presentation, diagnostic work-ups, possible pathophysiology, treatment response, and clinical outcomes.Results and conclusion New daily persistent headache is a controversial but clinically important topic. New daily persistent headache is likely not a single entity but a syndrome with different etiologies. The issue with past studies of new daily persistent headache is that patients with different etiologies/subtypes were pooled together. Different studies may investigate distinct subsets of patients, which renders the inter-study comparison, both positive and negative results, difficult. The identification (and removal) of a specific trigger might provide the opportunity for clinical improvement in certain patients, even when the disease has lasted for months or years. Nonetheless, if there is a specific trigger, it remains unknown or unidentified for a great proportion of the patients. We need to continue to study this unique headache population to better understand underlying pathogenesis and, most importantly, to establish effective treatment strategies that hopefully resolve the continuous cycle of pain.

New daily persistent headache: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the epidemiology, precipitants, phenotype, comorbidities, pathophysiology, treatment, and prognosis of primary new daily persistent headache. METHODS: We searched PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane, and clinicaltrials.gov until 31 December 2022. We included original research studies with any design with at least five participants with new daily persistent headache. We assessed risk of bias using National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tools. We used random-effects meta-analysis where suitable to calculate pooled estimates of proportions. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis compliant study is registered with PROSPERO (registration number CRD42022383561). RESULTS: Forty-six studies met inclusion criteria, predominantly case series, including 2155 patients. In 67% (95% CI 57-77) of cases new daily persistent headache has a chronic migraine phenotype, however new daily persistent headache has been found to be less likely than chronic migraine to be associated with a family history of headache, have fewer associated migrainous symptoms, be less vulnerable to medication overuse, and respond less well to injectable and neuromodulatory treatments. CONCLUSIONS: New daily persistent headache is a well described, recognisable disorder, which requires further research into its pathophysiology and treatment. There is a lack of high-quality evidence and, until this exists, we recommend continuing to consider new daily persistent headache a distinct disorder.

Association between iron deficiency anemia and chronic daily headache: A case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the association between iron deficiency anemia and chronic daily headache. METHODS: This case-control study was conducted in a tertiary care center in Dehradun, India. One hundred patients with chronic daily headache were randomly selected for the study with an equal number of controls. Subsets of chronic daily headache were diagnosed as per the 3rd edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders. The study participants were assessed for iron deficiency anemia. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 51.1 ± 22.1 years. Male: female ratio was 1:1.08. Chronic migraine was present in 62 (62%), tension-type headache in 23 (23%), and new daily persistent headache in 15 (15%) patients. The majority (96%) of patients had chronic daily headache of mild to moderate severity. Chronic daily headache was of long duration in all patients. Sixty-four (64%) patients had anemia of which 51 (51%) patients had iron deficiency anemia. Iron deficiency anemia showed a significant association with chronic daily headache (p < 0.001), but not with its type, subtype, and duration. Severe iron deficiency anemia had a significant association with the severity of chronic daily headache (p = 0.021). Serum iron, ferritin, total iron-binding capacity, and transferrin saturation also had a significant association with chronic daily headache (p < 0.05 for each), but not with its type, subtype, duration, and severity. Logistic regression analysis showed that iron deficiency anemia, total iron-binding capacity, and transferrin saturation had an independent association with chronic daily headache (p < 0.05 for each). CONCLUSIONS: Iron deficiency anemia had an independent association with chronic daily headache. Severe iron deficiency anemia was related to the severity of chronic daily headache.

Safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of repetitive intravenous dihydroergotamine for refractory chronic migraine with cardiovascular risk factors: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Dihydroergotamine (DHE), like triptans, is contraindicated in patients with ischemic heart disease or coronary vasospasm. Its true safety, tolerability, and efficacy in patients with cardiovascular risk without ischemic heart disease or coronary vasospasm remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of repetitive intravenous DHE in patients with cardiovascular risk factors. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Jefferson Headache Center inpatient unit for refractory chronic migraine patients treated with our intravenous DHE protocol between January 1, 2019, and October 15, 2019. We evaluated tolerability and effectiveness outcomes based on atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease 10-year calculated risk scores, stratified into low (<5.0%) and elevated (≥5.0%) risk. Data were presented in mean ± standard deviation or median (25th percentile, 75th percentile) if non-normally distributed. RESULTS: Among 347 patients (median age of 46 [36, 57], female n = 278 [80.1%]), who received inpatient intravenous DHE, 227 patients (age 53 [45, 60], female 81.1%) had calculable risk scores, 64 (28.2%) had elevated risk, and 38 (16.7%) had cardiology consultations. There were no clinically significant electrocardiogram abnormalities or cardiovascular adverse events. The median hospital length of stay was 6 (5, 7) days. Compared to the low-risk group, those with elevated risk had higher nausea (31.3% vs. 14.1%, p = 0.008), but similar initial DHE dose (0.5 [0.25, 0.5] vs. 0.5 [0.25, 0.5], p = 0.009), lower final DHE dose (0.75 [0.5, 1] vs. 1 [0.75, 1] p < 0.001), and lower pain reduction after admission (-3.8 [2.1, 6] vs. -5 [3, 7] p = 0.037). CONCLUSION: Patients receiving intravenous DHE by the Jefferson Headache Center inpatient headache protocol had significantly reduced pain severity at discharge. No clinically significant cardiac or electrocardiogram abnormalities were detected in patients with elevated (or low) atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk. Repetitive intravenous DHE used by our protocol was safe in refractory chronic migraine patients.

Eptinezumab for adolescents with chronic refractory headache: A retrospective chart review.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of eptinezumab for the treatment of chronic refractory headache in adolescents. BACKGROUND: Chronic refractory headache can lead to school absences and impaired quality of life in adolescents, and currently there are no pharmacologic treatments with level A evidence for headache prevention for this population. While observational data suggest that monoclonal antibodies to calcitonin gene-related peptide or its receptor may be helpful for adolescents who have refractory primary headache disorders, evidence is lacking for the use of eptinezumab. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective chart review. Demographic and headache phenotypic data were collected. Outcome measures included headache intensity and frequency pre- and post-infusion(s), and improvement in function or in associated symptoms. Adverse events were also collected. RESULTS: Nine patients with chronic migraine and two with new daily persistent headache received a first dose of 100 mg of eptinezumab. All of them had daily headache and nine had continuous headache at baseline. After the first infusion of 100 mg, two patients were no longer having daily headache, one patient stopped having continuous headache, and four patients noted headache intensity reduction. Additionally, one patient described a reduction in nausea and vomiting, and another patient noted improvement in function. Six patients received a second eptinezumab infusion of 100 mg, three had a third one, and one patient had four infusions of 100 mg. After the second infusion, one patient noted reduction in headache frequency, one experienced lower headache intensity, and two described pain "improving." With the third and fourth infusions, patients continued to report improvement in headache intensity. Subsequent infusions of 300 mg resulted in further reductions in headache frequency and intensity for some patients. Eptinezumab was overall well tolerated. CONCLUSION: While this was a small sample, findings suggest that eptinezumab may be a safe and effective treatment for chronic, refractory headache in adolescents.

[Headache associated with COVID-19 vaccination: how to classify?] / COVID-19-Impfung-assoziierte anhaltende Kopfschmerzen: Wie einordnen?

INTRODUCTION: In the setting of acute COVID-19 infection, headache occurs in 10-60% of patients and may last for days and, in a smaller proportion of patients, weeks (about 10%). However, it is less recognized that headache may also occur after vaccination with a short latency and may persist for a longer period in a still unclear number of patients. METHODS: Retrospective description of headache and course in a case series of 32 outpatients with headache that changed or recurred after COVID-19 vaccination. RESULTS: The majority of patients experienced an exacerbation of migraine headache; rare headache syndromes such as intracranial hypertension or thunderclap headache occurred in 2 patients. Headache manifested in more than 50% of patients within the first 48 h after vaccination. Over 50% of patients who received a triptan improved. CONCLUSION: The pathophysiological relationship between vaccination and persistent headache is not yet clearly understood. The short latency, partial efficacy of cortisone, and initial findings showing an increase of various inflammatory markers during the course of headache in COVID infection suggest a possible involvement of the innate immune system and here the inflammasome. Furthermore, the response to triptan in a proportion of patients also indicates activation of the trigeminovascular system.

Phenotype of new daily persistent headache: subtypes and comparison to transformed chronic daily headache.

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether new daily persistent headache (NDPH) is a single disorder or heterogenous group of disorders, and whether it is a unique disorder from chronic migraine and chronic tension-type headache. We describe a large group of patients with primary NDPH, compare its phenotype to transformed chronic daily headache (T-CDH), and use cluster analysis to reveal potential sub-phenotypes in the NDPH group. METHODS: We performed a case-control study using prospectively collected clinical data in patients with primary NDPH and T-CDH (encompassing chronic migraine and chronic tension-type headache). We used logistic regression with propensity score matching to compare demographics, phenotype, comorbidities, and treatment responses between NDPH and T-CDH. We used K-means cluster analysis with Gower distance to identify sub-clusters in the NDPH group based on a combination of demographics, phenotype, and comorbidities. RESULTS: We identified 366 patients with NDPH and 696 with T-CDH who met inclusion criteria. Patients with NDPH were less likely to be female (62.6% vs. 73.3%, p < 0.001). Nausea, vomiting, photophobia, phonophobia, motion sensitivity, vertigo, and cranial autonomic symptoms were all significantly less frequent in NDPH than T-CDH (p value for all < 0.001). Acute treatments appeared less effective in NDPH than T-CDH, and medication overuse was less common (16% vs. 42%, p < 0.001). Response to most classes of oral preventive treatments was poor in both groups. The most effective treatment in NDPH was doselupin in 45.7% patients (95% CI 34.8-56.5%). Cluster analysis identified three subgroups of NDPH. Cluster 1 was older, had a high proportion of male patients, and less severe headaches. Cluster 2 was predominantly female, had severe headaches, and few associated symptoms. Cluster 3 was predominantly female with a high prevalence of migrainous symptoms and headache triggers. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst there is overlap in the phenotype of NDPH and T-CDH, the differences in migrainous, cranial autonomic symptoms, and vulnerability to medication overuse suggest that they are not the same disorder. NDPH may be fractionated into three sub-phenotypes, which require further investigation.

Clinical characteristics of medication-overuse headache according to the class of acute medication: A cross-sectional multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the clinical features of patients with medication-overuse headache (MOH) according to the class of acute medications being overused. BACKGROUND: MOH is a common global health problem, severely disabling the majority of the patients affected. Although various medications can cause MOH, whether clinical features differ according to the overused medication type remains unclear. METHODS: We analyzed data from a multicenter cross-sectional study in neurology clinics in Korea from April 2020 to June 2021. RESULTS: Among 229 eligible patients, MOH was documented in patients who overused multiple drug classes (69/229, 30.1%; most frequent occurrence), triptans (50/229, 21.8%), non-opioid analgesics (48/229, 21.0%), and combination-analgesics (40/229, 17.4%). Patients who overused multiple drug classes reported more frequent use of acute medications (median [25th-75th percentiles]: 25.0 [15.0-30.0] vs. 17.5 [10.0-25.5] days/month, p = 0.029) and fewer crystal-clear days (0.0 [0.0-9.5] vs. 9.0 [0.0-10.0] days/month, p = 0.048) than those who overused triptans. Patients who overused multiple drug classes also reported shorter intervals from chronic daily headache to the onset of MOH than patients who overused combination-analgesics (0.6 [0.2-1.9] vs. 2.4 [0.7-5.4] years, p = 0.001) or non-opioid analgesics (1.5 [0.6-4.3] years, p = 0.004). Patients who overused multiple drug classes reported more emergency room visits (1.0 [0.0-1.0] visits/year) than those who overused combination-analgesics (0.0 [0.0-1.0], p = 0.024) or non-opioid analgesics (0.0 [0.0-1.0], p = 0.030). Patients who overused triptans reported fewer headache days (21.0 [20.0-30.0] vs. 30.0 [20.5-30.0] days/month, p = 0.008) and fewer severe headache days (7.0 [4.0-10.0] vs. 10.0 [5.0-15.0] days/month, p = 0.017) than those who overused non-opioid analgesics. CONCLUSIONS: Some clinical characteristics of MOH significantly differed according to the class of overused medications. The findings from this study may contribute to the understanding of the clinical characteristics and pathophysiology of MOH.

Alterations in the structure and function of the brain in adolescents with new daily persistent headache: A pilot MRI study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to explore brain morphological and functional connectivity alterations in adolescents with new daily persistent headache (NDPH) compared to pain-free, healthy controls. BACKGROUND: NDPH is one of the most disabling and least understood primary headache conditions. To date, no studies have considered the role of brain function and structure in pediatric patients with NDPH. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, resting-state functional and structural images were acquired for 13 patients with NDPH (M age = 15.9, standard deviation [SD] ± 1.4) and 13 age- and sex-matched controls (M age = 16.2, SD ± 1.8) using magnetic resonance imaging. Participants were recruited from the Pediatric Headache Program at Boston Children's Hospital and from the Greater Boston area. In patients, clinical features of NDPH, including disease duration, pain intensity ratings, pain sensitivity, and functional disability were also assessed, and their associations with functional and structural brain alterations were explored. RESULTS: Compared to controls, patients with NDPH demonstrated reduced cortical thickness in the bilateral superior temporal gyrus, left superior, and middle frontal gyrus areas (p < 0.05, Monte Carlo corrected for multiple comparisons). Furthermore, reduced cortical thickness of the left superior frontal gyrus was related to elevated pain sensitivity in NDPH (r = -0.79, p = 0.006). Patients showed altered functional connectivity between regions involved in emotional and cognitive networks of pain, including the amygdala, insula, frontal regions, and cerebellar subregions. CONCLUSION: The present study provides the first preliminary evidence of functional and structural brain differences in pediatric patients with NDPH compared to controls. Identifying alterations in cortical thickness and resting-state connectivity between specific brain regions could provide characteristics of NDPH and probable mechanisms that may guide personalized therapeutic interventions.

Carnitine Responsive Migraine Headache Syndrome: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review carnitine's role in migraine and headache, present a case of a patient with intractable chronic migraine refractory to medications but exquisitely responsive to mitochondrial cofactors with a particularly prompt response to L-carnitine supplementation with dose response, and suggest scenarios where L-carnitine could be considered for prophylactic treatment in migraine and intractable headache with migraine features. RECENT FINDINGS: Multiple treatments modalities are used to treat migraine, including nutraceutical therapies. Mitochondrial supplements are often used to treat migraine, based on controlled trials. One of the nutraceutical therapies used in neurological and non-neurological conditions is L-carnitine. A few studies have examined the effect of carnitine in patients with migraine. We present a case of a patient with chronic migraine-like headaches found to have carnitine deficiency whose headaches greatly improved with carnitine supplementation. This case suggests that secondary carnitine deficiency may cause chronic migraine. Energy deficiency states occur with migraine, and replenishment of energy substrates has demonstrated some improvement in migraine. Recent studies suggest that L-carnitine with other mitochondrial cofactors may be migraine preventives. The exact link between carnitine and migraine is unknown. Perhaps carnitine deficiency should be in the differential for refractory migraine. Supplementation with L-carnitine merits exploration as a nutraceutical treatment of chronic migraine. Our case suggests that there may be a dose-dependent response to L-carnitine.

CGRP antibody therapy in patients with drug resistant migraine and chronic daily headache: a real-world experience.

BACKGROUND: Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) (receptor) antibodies (erenumab, fremanezumab and galcanezumab) are increasingly used in prophylactic treatment of migraine. In the approval studies, severely affected patients with migraine and chronic daily headache without any headache free days were excluded. Thus, less is known about the effectiveness of CGRP antibody treatment in this cohort. METHODS: Clinical routine data of 32 patients with migraine and daily headache were analysed after three months of treatment with a CGRP antibody (16 erenumab, 7 galcanezumab, 9 fremanezumab), including changes of monthly headache days (MHD) monthly migraine days (MMD) and monthly acute medication intake (AMD) as well as migraine characteristics. Statistical analysis was performed with the Wilcoxon-Test. Migraine characteristics were analysed descriptively. RESULTS: The number of MHD was significantly reduced (mean reduction (standard error), p-value): (-4.2 (1.3), p = 0.009) as well as MMD (-4.3 (1.6), p = 0.033). Four patients (13 %) reached a 50 % reduction regarding MHD and 8 patients (25 %) regarding MMD, migraine duration and intensity improved under therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the low responder rate, CGRP antibodies can be effective at least in a few cases of severely affected patients with drug resistant migraine and chronic daily headache. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospective registered.

Headache in Behçet's Disease.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Our objective is to describe the various neurologic manifestations of Behcet's syndrome with special attention to headache syndromes. RECENT FINDINGS: Most recent studies have focused on data collection to better characterize the relatively rare disorder of neuro-Behcets (NBD). In patients with Behcet's disease (BD) who are experiencing headache, most are primary headache disorders, specifically tension type or migraines. Worsening headache can, however, be a sign of increased Behcets disease activity. Behcet's disease is a chronic, systemic, inflammatory disorder of unknown etiology. The prevalence of BD is most notable in countries along the ancient Silk Road, particularly the Middle East. BD occasionally has neurologic manifestations, further categorized into parenchymal and non-parenchymal syndromes. Headache is the most frequently reported neurological symptom of BD. Primary headaches are the most common headache type among patients with BD with comorbid headache disorders with debate regarding whether migraine or tension-type headache is most prevalent. Of the secondary causes of headache in BD, cerebral venous thrombosis is the most common.

An Update on Idiopathic Hypertrophic Cranial Pachymeningitis for the Headache Practitioner.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We aim to review idiopathic hypertrophic cranial pachymeninigitis (IHCP), describe common head pain patterns and features associated with the disorder, suggest potential classification of head pain syndromes based on the recently published International Classification of Headache Disorders-3, explore pathophysiology found to be associated with cases of IHCP, and indicate common treatment for the disorder. RECENT FINDINGS: It is suggested that a subset of IHCP is an IgG4-related autoimmune disorder. Patients with IHCP were found to have elevated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein and lymphocytic pleocytosis. Corticosteroids are a mainstay of treatment. Other immunosuppressive agents and steroid sparing agents as add-on therapy may have utility in the treatment of cases refractory to corticosteroids alone. Clinical manifestations of IHCP depend upon the location of the inflammatory lesions and compression of the adjacent nervous system structures. Headache and loss of cranial nerve function were the most common presenting features of hypertrophic cranial pachymeninigitis. Several headache diagnoses may result from IHCP. Gadolinium-enhanced MRI is the standard imaging modality for diagnosing. Although the pathophysiology is poorly understood, many cases of hypertrophic pachymeninigitis (HP) are thought to be closely related to inflammatory disorders. Cases of HP previously thought to be idiopathic may have IgG4 pathophysiology. CSF and serological studies are helpful. Treatment involves immunosuppressive agents. Advancement in neuroimaging, assays, tests, and further delineation of inflammatory disorders affecting the nervous system may provide further insight to the etiology of cases of HP previously considered and diagnosed as idiopathic.

[Tension type headaches : Quo vadis?] / Kopfschmerz vom Spannungstyp : Quo vadis?

Episodic tension type headache is considered to be the most prevalent primary headache. If tension type headache occurs on more than 15 days per month for at least 3 consecutive months, it is classified as chronic tension type headache. In recent years, it has become obvious that it is difficult to distinguish between episodic tension type headache and a moderate migraine attack and also between chronic tension type headache and chronic migraine. In the paper, we discuss how the differential diagnosis can be more specific and which therapy is supported by the literature. In addition, we discuss differences and similarities of tension type headache and migraine and a possible similar pathophysiology of both (convergence hypothesis).

New daily persistent headache (NDPH) triggered by a single Valsalva event: A case series.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a new subtype of new daily persistent headache that is triggered by a single Valsalva event. METHODS: A case series of patients was evaluated in an academic headache clinic over a 3-year time period. RESULTS: A total of seven patients (four female and three male) were diagnosed with this new subtype of new daily persistent headache. The headaches all began after a single Valsalva event. Average age at time of headache onset was 41 years (males: 39 years; females: 43 years) with an age range of 20-62 years. All patients developed their syndrome during the months of September to February with November and February being the most cited months (5/7 patients). Immediate worsening in the Trendelenburg position occurred in all patients and appeared to be an almost diagnostic test for the syndrome. No patient had papilledema on funduscopic exam. Five out of seven patients had no prior headache history including cough, exercise or migraine. Four of seven patients were of normal weight, while one was overweight and two were obese. A crowded posterior fossa was identified in five of seven patients on brain MRI. On cerebrospinal fluid pressure/volume lowering medication (acetazolamide, indomethacin and/or spironolactone), five out of seven patients achieved 90% plus improvement in headache frequency while three patients became pain free. Three patients were able to taper off medication without headache recurrence. CONCLUSION: New daily persistent headache after a single Valsalva event appears to be a unique subtype of new daily persistent headache that is responsive to cerebrospinal fluid pressure/volume lowering medications. An abnormal reset of cerebrospinal fluid pressure/intracranial pressure to an elevated state is the presumed pathogenesis and may relate to the patient's baseline neuroanatomy of a crowded posterior fossa. There appears to be a circadian periodicity to the onset of the syndrome. Worsening in the Trendelenburg position is a probable diagnostic test. Defining new daily persistent headache subtypes by triggering event appears to be making a positive inroad in the understanding of this condition and helps present new effective therapies.

Migraine Progression: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Migraine is a common and often debilitating neurological disease. It can be divided into episodic and chronic subforms based on the number of monthly headache days. Because only a subset of individuals with episodic migraine (EM) progress to chronic migraine (CM) over any given time period, understanding the factors that predict the new onset of CM or "migraine progression" may provide insights into the mechanisms, pathophysiology, prevention, and treatment of CM. In this review, we identify and summarize studies that report risk factors associated with the new onset of CM or related chronic headache diagnoses, group these risk factors and report the strength of evidence for the identified risk factors. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of studies that identify risk factors for the new onset of CM or related chronic headache diagnoses such as transformed migraine (TM) and chronic daily headache (CDH). METHODS: Herein we summarize the findings of studies of risk factors associated with the new onset of CM/TM, CDH, or related diagnoses from the English language literature published before March 2018. The PubMed database was searched for relevant studies. Longitudinal studies with follow-up data and case-control studies were included in this qualitative synthesis. We report methodology, analytic criteria, and results for each manuscript and for the parent study. Next, we review the strength of evidence for each of the identified risk factors using a modified version of AB Hill's criteria for causation and rank evidence as fair, moderate, or strong. We categorized risk factors as nonmodifiable, modifiable and based on putative mechanisms. We further categorized risk factors into sociodemographics, lifestyle factors and habits, headache features, comorbid and concomitant diseases and conditions and pharmacologic treatment-related. Finally, we review theories of the pathophysiology underlying the development of new onset chronic migraine or increasing attack frequency. RESULTS: The PubMed search yielded 1870 records after duplicates were removed. Nine additional records were identified through expert consultation and other methods (eg, citations found as references in manuscripts identified in the literature review and through communication with the authors of manuscripts included in the review). The 1879 manuscripts were screened against the inclusion and exclusion criteria and 109 were found to be potentially eligible. Of 109 full-text articles, 17 studies were identified as meeting the prespecified criteria based on the consensus of all authors. Of the 17 full texts, 13 were longitudinal cohort studies and 4 were case-controlled studies. We found strength of evidence ranging from fair to strong for the identified risk factors. The strongest data were found for increased headache day frequency, depression, and medication overuse/high-frequency use. Risk factors for new onset CM and CDH in children and adolescents were similar to those identified in adults. CONCLUSIONS: A range of risk factors for the new onset of CM/TM, CDH, or related chronic headache diseases were identified with the strongest data supporting increased headache day frequency, acute medication overuse/high-frequency use and depression, which are potentially modifiable risk factors. Modifiable risk factors may provide targets for intervention. The lack of strong evidence or any evidence does not imply that there is not a relationship between a particular risk factor and new onset CM or related disease; but may indicate little or no research or that research did not have sufficient methodological rigor. In addition, it is likely that additional risk factors exist which have not yet been identified. Putative factors include pro-inflammatory states and pro-thrombotic states. Development of central sensitization and increased activation of the trigeminal nociceptive pathways may be drivers of the new onset of CM or CDH. Future research may include the systematic testing of interventions targeting modifiable risk factors to determine if progression can be prevented as well as continued exploration of the benefits of treating these risk factors among people with CM in an effort to increase rates of remission. Future work should also consider the natural fluctuations in headache day frequency and examine progression in terms of continuous definitions rather than or in addition to a dichotomous boundary.

Validity and Reliability of the Fibromyalgia Rapid Screening Tool Among Individuals with Chronic Daily Headache: A Clinic-Based Study.

BACKGROUND: Fibromyalgia is a common chronic pain disorder typically associated with headache disorders, particularly chronic daily headache. However, fibromyalgia is typically underdiagnosed and undertreated. The Fibromyalgia Rapid Screening Tool questionnaire is a brief, self-administered questionnaire composed of six "yes/no" questions for detecting fibromyalgia. The Fibromyalgia Rapid Screening Tool questionnaire has demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity among patients with chronic diffuse pain conditions. This study assessed the validity and reliability of the aforementioned questionnaire for detecting fibromyalgia among patients with chronic daily headache. METHODS: Consecutive first-visit headache patients with primary chronic daily headache (≥15 days/month for three or more months) at the outpatient clinics of four university hospitals were enrolled in this study from April 2015 to October 2015, and the validity and reliability of the Fibromyalgia Rapid Screening Tool questionnaire for determining fibromyalgia were evaluated. Fibromyalgia was diagnosed according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria of 2010. RESULTS: A total of 171 patients with primary chronic daily headache were recruited, and 100 (58.4%) were determined to have fibromyalgia. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that a cutoff score of 5 (corresponding to the number of positive items) provided the highest rate of correct identification of patients (77.2%), with a sensitivity of 70.0% and specificity of 87.3%. The positive and negative predictive values were 88.6% and 67.4%, respectively. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.684. CONCLUSIONS: The Fibromyalgia Rapid Screening Tool is a valid and reliable instrument for identifying fibromyalgia among patients with chronic daily headache.