Perceptions of and preparedness for cross-cultural care: a survey of final-year medical students in Ireland.

BACKGROUND: Migration is increasing globally, and societies are becoming more diverse and multi-ethnic. Medical school curricula should prepare students to provide high-quality care to all individuals in the communities they serve. Previous research from North America and Asia has assessed the effectiveness of medical cultural competency training, and student preparedness for delivery of cross-cultural care. However, student preparedness has not been explored in the European context. The aim of this study was to investigate how prepared final-year medical students in the Republic of Ireland (ROI) feel to provide care to patients from other countries, cultures, and ethnicities. In addition, this study aims to explore students' experiences and perceptions of cross-cultural care. METHODS: Final-year medical students attending all six medical schools within the ROI were invited to participate in this study. A modified version of the Harvard Cross-Cultural Care Survey (CCCS) was used to assess their preparedness, skill, training/education, and attitudes. The data were analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics 28.0, and Fisher's Exact Test was employed to compare differences within self-identified ethnicity groups and gender. RESULTS: Whilst most respondents felt prepared to care for patients in general (80.5%), many felt unprepared to care for specific ethnic patient cohorts, including patients from a minority ethnic background (50.7%) and the Irish Traveller Community (46.8%). Only 20.8% of final-year students felt they had received training in cross-cultural care during their time in medical school. Most respondents agreed that they should be assessed specifically on skills in cultural competence whilst in medical school (83.2%). CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of final-year medical students surveyed in Ireland feel inadequately prepared to care for ethnically diverse patients. Similarly, they report feeling unskilled in core areas of cross-cultural care, and a majority agree that they should be assessed on aspects of cultural competency. This study explores shortcomings in cultural competency training and confidence amongst Irish medical students. These findings have implications for future research and curricular change, with opportunities for the development of relevant educational initiatives in Irish medical schools.

Immigrant and minority parents' experiences in a neonatal intensive care unit: A meta-ethnography review.

AIMS: To examine immigrant and minority parents' experiences of having a newborn infant in the neonatal intensive care unit and explore healthcare professionals' experiences in delivering care to immigrant and minority families. DESIGN: A meta-ethnographic review informed by eMERGe guidelines. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review. Studies were included if they explored immigrant or minority parent experiences in neonatal intensive care units and health professional experiences delivering care to immigrant and minority families in neonatal intensive care. Reporting followed ENTREQ guidelines. DATA SOURCES: Database searches included CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus and Google Scholar. Boolean search strategies were used to identify qualitative studies. No limitations on commencement date; the end date was 23rd August 2022. PRISMA guidelines used for screening and article quality assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute criteria for qualitative studies. RESULTS: Initial search yielded 2468 articles, and nine articles met criteria for inclusion. Three overarching themes were identified: (1) Overwhelming Emotions, (subthemes: Overwhelming Inadequacy; Cultural Expressions of Guilt; Not Belonging), (2) Circles of Support, (subthemes: Individual Level-Spirituality; External Level-Connecting with Family; Structured Peer-to-Peer Support), (3) Negotiating Relationships with Healthcare Professionals (subthemes: Connecting; Disconnected; Linguistic Barriers). Interactions between healthcare professionals and immigrant and minority parents were the strongest recurring theme. CONCLUSIONS: There can be a mismatch between immigrant and minority families' needs and the service support provided, indicating improvements in neonatal intensive care are needed. Despite challenges, parents bring cultural and family strengths that support them through this time, and many neonatal intensive care staff provide culturally respectful care. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: Professionals should be encouraged to identify and work with family strengths to ensure parents feel supported in the neonatal intensive care unit. Findings can inform policy and practice development to strengthen health professionals capabilities to support immigrant and minority families in neonatal units. REPORTING METHOD: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklists were used to report the screening process.

Caring for Muslim Patients: A Primer for the Obstetrician Gynecologist.

Studies show that Muslim American patients experience discrimination and feel uncomfortable seeking appropriate health care for various reasons. Obstetrician-gynecologists should be educated regarding Islamic perspectives on topics such as modesty, sexual health, contraception, abortion, infertility, and fasting during pregnancy. Understanding the barriers Muslim patients face and improving cultural humility will improve the quality of sexual and reproductive care delivered to Muslim patients.

El mal paraje y la mala hora: notas sobre la violencia naturalista hacia el saber médico andino / Mal paraje and mala hora: remarks on the naturalistic violence towards Andean medical knowledge

RESUMEN Las nociones locales de mal paraje y mala hora son claves para explicar los orígenes de muchas enfermedades en el saber médico andino. Pese a su importancia etnográfica, ni la investigación antropológica ni el saber biomédico han tratado adecuadamente estas distinciones locales, relegándolas muchas veces al olvido. Nuestro objetivo es explorar el origen de esta limitación de la producción antropológica y biomédica. La hipótesis es que se relaciona con la utilización implícita de ciertos supuestos teóricos naturalistas a la hora de abordar este fenómeno, tanto de parte de las ciencias sociales como de los saberes biomédicos, lo que produce una violencia simbólica y epistémica contra el saber médico andino que denominamos violencia naturalista. Respecto a la metodología, se analizó información etnográfica sobre la comunidad Aymara de Camiña (Tarapacá, Chile) y la principal literatura producida. Centramos nuestro análisis en las nociones de mal paraje y mala hora, utilizando la técnica de análisis de contenido. Concluimos que los principales obstáculos naturalistas se manifiestan en el tratamiento que reciben las entidades territoriales, las relaciones que se establecen entre éstas y los seres humanos (reciprocidad), y las concepciones de espacio/tiempo presente en el diagnóstico de una enfermedad.

ABSTRACT The local notions of mal paraje [bad place] and mala hora [bad time] are key to explaining many illnesses in Andean medical knowledge. Notwithstanding the relevance of these notions ethnographically, neither anthropological research nor biomedical knowledge has properly dealt with these local distinctions, and have largely relegated them to the shadows. Our aim is to examine the origin of this shortcoming of anthropological and biomedical knowledge production. Our hypothesis is that such shortcoming is related to the implicit use of certain naturalistic theoretical presuppositions, both from the point of view of social sciences and from the point of view of biomedical research, producing symbolic and epistemic violence against Andean medical knowledge which we call naturalistic violence. In methodological terms we examine ethnographic data from the Aymara community of Camiña (Tarapacá, Chile) and the literature produced on this topic. We focus on the notions of mal paraje and mala hora using the content analysis technique. We conclude that the main naturalistic obstacles include the treatment received by territorial entities, the relationships established among these entities and human beings (reciprocity), and the conceptions of space/time present in the diagnosis of a disease.