Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan Versus Trastuzumab Emtansine for Patients With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the cost-effectiveness of trastuzumab deruxtecan compared with trastuzumab emtansine as second-line therapy for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive metastatic breast cancer from a US healthcare sector perspective. METHODS: A 3-state partitioned survival model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of trastuzumab deruxtecan compared with trastuzumab emtansine. For both treatments, modeled patients were administered treatment intravenously every 3 weeks indefinitely or until disease progression. Transition parameters were principally derived from the updated DESTINY-Breast03 phase III randomized clinical trial. Costs include drug costs extracted from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services average sales price and administrative, adverse event, and third-line therapy costs derived from published literature, measured in 2022 US dollars. Health utilities for health states and disutilities for adverse events were sourced from published literature. Effects were measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). We conducted both probabilistic sensitivity analysis and comprehensive scenario analysis to test model assumptions and robustness, while utilizing a lifetime horizon. RESULTS: In our base-case analysis, total costs for trastuzumab deruxtecan were $1 266 945, compared with $820 082 for trastuzumab emtansine. Total QALYs for trastuzumab deruxtecan were 5.09, compared with 3.15 for trastuzumab emtansine. The base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $230 285/QALY. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that trastuzumab deruxtecan had an 11.1% probability of being cost-effective at a $100 000 per QALY willingness-to-pay threshold. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the higher efficacy of trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive metastatic breast cancer, our findings raise concern regarding its value at current prices.

Implementation of a standardised pharmacist check of medical orders prior to preparation of anticancer drugs to reduce drug wastage.

BACKGROUND: The increasing cost of anticancer drugs is now being recognised as a global problem, and measures against drug wastage are among the most important cost containment strategies for anticancer drugs. OBJECTIVE: When blood examination results or changes to a patient's condition necessitate dose reduction or discontinuation of anticancer drugs after their preparation, the compounded anticancer drugs are discarded. To reduce anticancer drug wastage after preparation, we developed a protocol that set the eligibility, start of treatment, dose reduction and discontinuation criteria for injectable anticancer drugs and assessed the effect of pharmacists' checks of these criteria based on the present protocol prior to preparation of injectable anticancer drugs. METHOD: Observations before and after introduction of the protocol were conducted at Gifu University Hospital. We recorded the number, type and cost of anticancer drugs discarded after preparation and the reason for discarding these drugs in our dedicated database. RESULTS: Checking the criteria for anticancer drug administration before preparation significantly reduced the rate at which anticancer drugs within a chemotherapy cycle were discarded after preparation compared with that prior to the protocol's introduction (0.367% [18/4909] vs 0.032% [2/6248], P < .001). Additionally, the total cost of anticancer drugs discarded after preparation was reduced from JPY 2 041 786 (USD 18 562) to JPY 398 414 (USD 3622). CONCLUSION: Pharmacists' checks of the eligibility, start of treatment, dose reduction and discontinuation criteria for anticancer drugs based on the present protocol prior to preparation of injectable anticancer drugs was useful for reducing drug wastage after preparation.

The impact of cancer drug wastage on economic evaluations.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine the impact of modeling cancer drug wastage in economic evaluations because wastage can result from single-dose vials on account of body surface area- or weight-based dosing. METHODS: Intravenous chemotherapy drugs were identified from the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review (pCODR) program as of January 2015. Economic evaluations performed by drug manufacturers and pCODR were reviewed. Cost-effectiveness analyses and budget impact analyses were conducted for no-wastage and maximum-wastage scenarios (ie, the entire unused portion of the vial was discarded at each infusion). Sensitivity analyses were performed for a range of body surface areas and weights. RESULTS: Twelve drugs used for 17 indications were analyzed. Wastage was reported (ie, assumptions were explicit) in 71% of the models and was incorporated into 53% by manufacturers; this resulted in a mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratio increase of 6.1% (range, 1.3%-14.6%). pCODR reported and incorporated wastage for 59% of the models, and this resulted in a mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratio increase of 15.0% (range, 2.6%-48.2%). In the maximum-wastage scenario, there was a mean increase in the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 24.0% (range, 0.0%-97.2%), a mean increase in the 3-year total incremental budget costs of 26.0% (range, 0.0%-83.1%), and an increase in the 3-year total incremental drug budget cost of approximately CaD $102 million nationally. Changing the mean body surface area or body weight caused 45% of the drugs to have a change in the vial size and/or quantity, and this resulted in increased drug costs. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer drug wastage can increase drug costs but is not uniformly modeled in economic evaluations. Cancer 2017;123:3583-90. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Cost-effectiveness and drug wastage of bevacizumab biosimilar with or without chemotherapy for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The cost-effectiveness of adding bevacizumab biosimilar with or without chemotherapy (CT) and drug wastage in treating platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer (PRrOC) was assessed. METHODS: A three-state partitioned-survival model to compare the clinical and economic outcomes in the treatment of patients with PRrOC from a Taiwan healthcare prospective, extrapolated to two years based on data obtained from the JGOG3023 clinical trial. The primary outcomes of the model were incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). RESULTS: In the base-case scenario, using vials of bevacizumab biosimilar (Bevbiol) plus chemotherapy, the ICER was (new Taiwan dollar) NT$ 4,555,878 per QALY gained. The incremental cost savings of an incremental 2.02 QALYs were NT$ 1,605,828 if weight-based Bevbiol plus chemotherapy were used, but the ICER remained high at the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold. If the cost of Bevbiol were reduced to 50% per vial, adding it to CT would be cost-effective at an acceptable WTP threshold of NTD 2,994,200, with an ICER of NT$ 2,975,484. CONCLUSIONS: Bevacizumab biosimilars in mg/kg dosage form with chemotherapy are still not cost-effective in Taiwan, but using weight-based dosing will reduce drug waste and save treatment costs.

A pharmacist check of patients' infection-related condition prior to drug preparation reduces anticancer drug wastage after mixing: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: We previously reported that a standardized pharmacist check of medical orders related to the administration criteria of anticancer drugs prior to preparation of injectable anticancer drugs was useful for reducing drug wastage after mixing. To further reduce anticancer drug wastage after preparation, we added a pharmacist check of patients' infection-related condition to the previous protocol and assessed the effectiveness of the modified protocol for reducing injectable anticancer drug wastage. METHODS: In addition to the administration criteria of anticancer drugs, patients' infection-related condition, which was based on a body temperature ≥ 37.5 °C or elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) or white blood cell (WBC) count from baseline, was added to pharmacists' checklist of items used previously to prepare injectable anticancer drugs. We retrospectively compared the number, type and cost of anticancer drugs discarded after preparation and the reasons for discarding these drugs between pre- and post-protocol modification. RESULTS: The rate at which anticancer drugs were discarded after preparation was significantly reduced after introducing the modified protocol compared to the original protocol (0.288% [18/6253] vs. 0.095% [6/6331], P = 0.013). Furthermore, the number of cases for which mixed anticancer agents were discarded because of infection decreased from 11 (fever: n = 8; elevated CRP or WBC: n = 3) to one (elevated CRP: n = 1) a year. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to the standard administration criteria of anticancer drugs, checking patients' infection-related condition, defined by a body temperature ≥ 37.5 °C or elevated CRP or WBC from baseline, before mixing by the pharmacist is useful for reducing anticancer drug wastage after preparation.

Quantifying Drug Wastage and Economic Loss of Chemotherapy Drugs at an Adult Oncology Care of a Tertiary Care Public Hospital in India.

Background and objective New drugs have revolutionized cancer care, but their high cost requires cost-effectiveness studies. However, these studies only consider optimal use, neglecting real-world wastage. We aim to assess chemotherapy drug wastage and financial loss in our adult oncology care. Methods A total of 100 adult patients attending daycare oncology were prospectively evaluated. The total dose of parenteral anticancer drug, the amount administered, and the amount of drug wasted were recorded for each patient. The economic loss estimation was done considering the unit cost for the drug. Results Our study evaluated 157 parenteral drug administrations of 10 different anticancer drugs in 100 enrolled patients. The most common diagnosis was breast cancer (39/100; 39%), and the most commonly prescribed drugs were paclitaxel (36/157; 23%) and cyclophosphamide (21/157; 13%). However, the wastage percentage varied from 6% to 35.06%, and the overall wastage estimated was 16,298 mg (20.06%) of the total drug procured. Notably, the highest proportion of drug wastage was observed for carboplatin (2,525/7200 mg; 35.06%), whereas oxaliplatin, gemcitabine, 5-FU, and cisplatin wastage were more than 20% of the ordered drug. The total cost of the chemotherapy drug procured was 7,26,005 INR (8,738.78 USD), and drug wastage amounted to 17.14% of the total drug cost, resulting in an economic loss of 1,24,485 INR (1,498.40 USD). Gemcitabine (542.86 USD), oxaliplatin (452.66 USD), and paclitaxel (286.15 USD) were responsible for the maximum cost of wastage. Conclusion Drug wastage and financial loss are significant for carboplatin, oxaliplatin, and gemcitabine, with small proportions of paclitaxel also contributing to economic loss. Possible solutions include planning pharmacy inventory for multiple vial sizes and drug-wise batching strategies to facilitate vial sharing. However, these approaches may present challenges. The pharmaceutical industry can consider initiatives such as providing varying packaging sizes to minimize drug wastage.

Real-world analysis of the economic and therapeutic burden in advanced breast cancer patients in Italy.

BACKGROUND: This real-world analysis evaluated drug utilization focusing on wastage and healthcare costs for treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer (aBC) hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (HER2-) in Italy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on administrative data covering about 13.3 million health-assisted individuals. Across January/2017-June/2021, all patients with HR+/HER2-aBC were identified by ≥ 1 prescription for cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK 4/6i). Cost analysis was performed and updated referring to the prices of November 2021. RESULTS: Overall, 3,647 HR+/HER2-aBC patients were included (2,627 palbociclib treated, 729 ribociclib treated, and 291 abemaciclib treated). After 12 months of follow-up, 35% of palbociclib patients had a dose reduction (on average 8.9 wasted pills/patient), 44.7% of abemaciclib patients had a dose reduction (on average 6.7 wasted pills/patient), 22.1% of ribociclib patients had a dose reduction (no wasted pills). Therapy wastage added up to 528,716€ for palbociclib-treated patients (524€/patient) and 5,738€ in abemaciclib-treated patients (151€/patient). No wastage was attributed to ribociclib. CONCLUSIONS: Dose reduction was associated with drug wastage in palbociclib and abemaciclib-treated patients, but not in ribociclib-treated ones. These findings might be helpful to policy decision-makers who, for healthcare strategies implementation, among several variables should consider the possible restraining of drug wastage.

Interventions to reduce waste and improve billing compliance with medications in single-dose vials.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this process improvement project was to implement features in the electronic health record to help reduce inappropriate drug waste and Medicare billing noncompliance for injectable drugs in single-dose vials in outpatient settings. METHODS: The pharmacy department mapped processes from order entry to dose administration and claims processing. They used the process map to identify gaps that could lead to inappropriate drug waste. The organization then chose 3 drugs they believed to be at high risk of excess waste and possible billing noncompliance after cross-referencing drug cost, volume of use, and previous Medicare audits in outpatient settings. They tested a grouper and dose rounding on these drugs and compared 3 months of claims before and after implementation to assess the impact on waste and billing compliance. RESULTS: This study evaluated 826 claims before implementation and 1,075 claims after implementation. A total of 455 of 826 (55.1%) preimplementation claims included drug waste compared to 224 of 1,075 (20.8%) postimplementation claims. Twenty-three claims before implementation included an amount of waste exceeding the smallest vial size, putting the institution at risk of billing noncompliance. No claims had excess waste in the postimplementation period. The approximate cost of total drug waste before implementation was $1,397,437, with approximately $23,730 from inappropriate carfilzomib claims. The approximate cost of waste after implementation was $569,041. This equated to a reduction in drug waste of approximately $828,396 for bevacizumab-bvzr, carfilzomib, and ipilimumab. CONCLUSION: Using a grouper and implementing dose rounding, the institution reduced drug waste, saved money, and reduced the incidence of claims noncompliant with Medicare Part B billing requirements.

The Cost of Enfortumab Vedotin Wastage Due to Vial Size-A Real-World Analysis.

Enfortumab Vedotin (EV) is FDA-approved for advanced urothelial cancer in patients previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and a checkpoint inhibitor. We conducted a real-world study to determine the extent of EV wastage in a single institution and assessed the financial impact of EV wastage annually in the United States. Systematic examination of the usage and wastage of all standard-of-care EV treatments administered to urothelial cancer patients at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) between 1 January 2020 and 31 December 2020 was performed. Drug wastage was calculated by subtracting the actual administered dose from the total dose in an optimal set of vials. We built a pharmacoeconomic model to assess the financial impact of EV wastage annually in the US using the January 2021 Average Sales Prices from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Sixty-four patients were treated with standard-of-care EV, with a median of 11 doses per patient (range 1-28). Wastage occurred in 46% of administered doses (367/793), with a mean waste per dose of 2.9% (0-18%). The average drug wastage cost per patient was $3127 ($252/dose). The annual cost of EV wastage in the US is estimated to be $15 million based on wastage data from a single center in the US. In summary, EV wastage due to available vial sizes was 2.9%, which falls under acceptable thresholds. While the percentage of EV wastage is relatively low, waste-minimizing practices may reduce the financial toxicity for the individual patient and for society.

Cost-effectiveness and drug wastage of immunotherapeutic agents for hematologic malignancies: a systematic review.

Introduction: Novel immunotherapeutic agents (e.g. monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific T-cell engagers) as treatment options for hematologic malignancies continue to emerge. These agents have been used as the standard of care in specific disease states and are associated with high costs. Value assessment of these therapies is of critical importance for coverage and reimbursement decision-making.Areas covered: We identified 15 immunotherapeutic agents through the U.S. FDA approvals for hematologic malignancies until 2018 and systematically reviewed related cost-effectiveness studies. Additionally, we examined whether drug wastage was accounted for in these studies.Expert opinion: We reviewed 51 studies for 14 identified immunotherapeutic agents that met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. Three studies were observational-based, one study was model-based and incorporated observational data. The remaining studies were model-based with the majority of the model parameters extracted from randomized control trials (RCTs). Among 43 model-based economic evaluations, 13 studies accounted for drug wastage. Most of the studies showed favorable incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of immunotherapeutic agents-containing regimens when compared with no immunotherapeutic agents-containing regimens. Alemtuzumab, brentuximab vedotin, and daratumumab were not considered cost-effective across all the studies. Further investigations are warranted to establish the value of recent immunotherapeutic agents for hematologic malignancies.

Optimal vial sizes for infliximab injection: a simulation study of Japanese demographic data.

OBJECTIVES: Drug wastage costs in the medical field must be reduced, particularly for expensive biological drugs. In Japan, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) has developed specific criteria for the divided use of injectable vials and vial sharing of anticancer injection drugs to reduce drug wastage. This study investigates the optimal vial size for infliximab infusion to reduce drug wastage in Japan. METHOD: A log-normal distribution was assumed for body weight, and hypothetical data were simulated using the software R. We assumed the average wastage in milligrams (mg) by considering different vial sizes in addition to the existing 100 mg size. We also assumed 18 different vial size combinations for rheumatism patients by gender. The range was 10-95 mg with 5 mg increments. Using the total amount of wasted doses for the existing 100 mg size as a baseline, we evaluated the effect of using additional vial sizes on the total amount of wasted doses. KEY FINDINGS: The average cost of infliximab wastage per case was found to be US$ 353.8 for males and US$ 359.6 for females. For a 15 mg plus 100 mg combination, the average cost of infliximab wastage per case became US$ 20.2 for males and US$ 26.1 for females. In other words, infliximab wastage would be reduced by 94.3% for males and 92.8% for females. CONCLUSIONS: Adding a 15 mg vial size to the existing 100 mg size can reduce wastage. Producing drugs in different vial sizes can thus help significantly reduce the cost burden on the national health care system.

Comparing Manufacturer Submitted and Pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review Reanalysed Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios for Novel Oncology Drugs.

BACKGROUND: To determine the magnitude of difference between manufacturer-submitted and pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review (pCODR) calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), incremental cost (ΔC), and incremental effectiveness (ΔE); to examine whether there is a significant difference in the proportion of ICERs deemed cost-effective; to evaluate trends in the ICERs over time; and to identify methodological issues in manufacturer-submitted economic models. METHODS: Economic guidance reports for all drug indications submitted from July 2011-November 2018 were extracted from the pCODR database. Cumulative distribution plots were constructed to compare the manufacturer-submitted economic values with both the pCODR lower- and upper-reanalyzed estimates. The proportion of drug reviews considered cost-effective at varying willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds by the manufacturer and pCODR were calculated. Manufacturer changes in ICERs over time from 2012 to 2018 were determined. Recurring methodological issues with manufacturer submissions were tallied. RESULTS: There were 73 unique indications that were included. Manufacturer-submitted ICERs were consistently lower than pCODR estimates for most indications. Manufacturer-submitted ICERs were generally more cost-effective over a range of WTP thresholds. From 2012 to 2018, manufacturer and economic guidance panel (EGP) lower limit reanalyzed ICERs did not change significantly over time. However, EGP upper limit re-analyses did show decreasing cost-effectiveness (increasing ICERs). The two most common issues identified in the manufacturer-submitted models were related to survival time horizon and utility estimates. CONCLUSIONS: Manufacturers tend to overestimate the cost-effectiveness of their therapies when submitting economic models to pCODR. Although certain methodological issues are still common in manufacturer-submitted models, revision rates are high for most issues raised by pCODR.

The Wastage and Economic Effects of Anaesthetic Drugs and Consumables in the Operating Room.

OBJECTIVE: Anaesthesia is a branch in which new anaesthetic drugs, devices, instruments and new treatment methods have been developed. Because of these innovations, health expenditures have escalated. Anaesthetic drugs and consumables constitute the majority of these expenses. Some waste of used drugs and consumables in the operating room is unavoidable. However, excessive drug wastage can be controlled. One of the ways to reduce the financial burden of this wastage is to know the loss cost. This study aimed to discuss the effect of the wastage of drugs and consumables. METHODS: This prospective observational study was conducted in a hospital operating room over a six-week period. At the end of each operation and at the end of each operation day, the amount of wasted and consumables was recorded. The total wastage of the drugs and consumables was calculated by multiplying unit prices. RESULTS: Data of 363 cases were collected during the study period. The total loss cost calculated during the study period was 2545.77 TL. The highest total loss cost was rocuronium (29.95%) and propofol (27.99%). The least loss was neostigmine (0.06%). The consumption rate of consumables was lower than that of drugs. CONCLUSION: A significant amount of drug wastage was recorded during the study period. This can be reduced by simple means. These applications vary from physician behavioural change to the preparation of standard doses of single-dose preparations. Cost training programmes at regular intervals can also be used as a cost-reduction strategy.

Bemfola® fixed dose pens potentially reduce drug wastage and associated costs of infertility treatment.

Bemfola® is a recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) used during infertility treatment. One main differentiator between FSH products is their delivery device; consisting of multi-dose pens (Gonal-f®), vials or multi-dose preparations (Menopur®), or adjustable daily disposable dose pens (Bemfola®). To determine the potential impact of delivery device on drug wastage during infertility treatment this study retrospectively analysed Gonal-f® and Menopur® prescription and usage data from five UK clinics. Incurred drug wastage was then compared to potential Bemfola® drug wastage. Data collected included: (i) number of treatment cycles; (ii) daily FSH dose; (iii) length of treatment; (iv) dose adjustment following ultrasound scan; (v) FSH formulation(s) prescribed and (vi) agonist/antagonist protocol used. Treatment with Gonal-f® (4078 cycles) and Menopur® (646 cycles) resulted in an average drug wastage of 160 and 294 IU per treatment cycle. Use of Bemfola® instead of Gonal-f® and Menopur® may reduce the wastage to 104 and 61 IU per cycle, respectively. The use of Bemfola®, across all 4724 cycles, could result in a drug wastage reduction of up to 376,800 IUs with an associated cost saving of £100,011. Bemfola® is a viable alternative to Gonal-f® and Menopur® with its drug delivery system potentially reducing drug wastage and associated costs during infertility treatment.

Dosing Patterns and Economic Burden of Palbociclib Drug Wastage in HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Targeted therapies have revolutionized the treatment of hormone receptor positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC). However, as for many oncology drugs, the dose of targeted therapies may need to be adjusted over time, leading to drug wastage when a dose modification is needed but the dose cannot be split or saved. This has been shown to be the case for palbociclib and has led to concerns among payers. This study described palbociclib dosing patterns and estimated the economic burden of the drug wastage associated with palbociclib dose modifications in postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2- mBC. METHODS: A large US claims database was used to identify postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2- mBC who received a palbociclib-based therapy during one of their first three lines of therapy for mBC between February 2015 (palbociclib approval) and December 2015. Dosing patterns (dosing modifications and sequences) were reported; a dose modification was defined as an increase/decrease of at least 25 mg daily compared to the preceding dose. Estimates of drug wastage costs were based on days with overlap in prescription fills for different palbociclib doses. RESULTS: A total of 473 postmenopausal palbociclib-treated women with HR+/HER2- mBC were included (first line 214; second line 157; third line 120). Over an average duration of line of therapy of approximately 4 months, dose modification was observed in 17.8%, 31.2%, and 35.0% of patients in first, second, and third line. Average overlap in prescription fills was 9.2, 9.9, and 5.4 days in first, second, and third line. This potential drug wastage resulted in an average cost of $4376, $4740, and $2592 per patient in first, second, and third line. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that drug wastage due to palbociclib dose modification results in substantial costs. Treatment options with more flexible dosing may help reduce the costs of drug wastage. FUNDING: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.

Real-world palbociclib dosing patterns and implications for drug costs in the treatment of HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study described real-world palbociclib dosing patterns and associated impacts on treatment costs for HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC) in the US. METHODS: Postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2- mBC who initiated palbociclib-based therapy (initiation date = index date) between 02/03/2015 (palbociclib approval) and 02/29/2016, and continuous quarterly activity 1 year before and 6 months after the index date, were identified in the Symphony Health Solutions database. Rates of 1) dose reduction (≥25 mg dose decrease/daily), and 2) reduction or interruption (>60 day gap in continuous drug supply) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analyses. Drug wastage cost was estimated based on overlapping days between two prescription fills: the last original dose fill and the first reduced dose fill. RESULTS: 1,242 patients initiated palbociclib-based therapy (mean age = 62.7 years, median follow-up = 8.7 months). During the 12-month post-index period, across the first four lines, dose reduction rates were 31.9-33.7% and dose reduction/interruption rates were 63.5-80.9%. A total of 411 (33.1%) patients changed dose, among whom 128 (31.1%) experienced prescription fill overlap (average = 11.1 days). Mean potential drug wastage cost among patients with fill overlap was $5,471. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients receiving palbociclib experienced dose reduction or interruption early in treatment; the associated drug wastage may lead to considerable costs.

Analysis of expired medications in Serbian households.

INTRODUCTION: An ongoing issue of expired medications accumulating in some households is a universal problem around the world. The aim of the study was to investigate the extent and structure of expired medications in Serbian households, and to determine which therapeutic groups generated the most waste. METHODS: This was an observational, cross-sectional study conducted in households in the city of Novi Sad, Serbia. The study had been performed over 8 month period (December 2011 - July 2012) and it consisted of personal insights into the medication inventory in households. RESULTS: Of 1008 families, 383 agreed to participate and complete the questionnaire (38.3% response rate). In almost a half of households (44.4%), expired medications were maintained. The amount of expired medications was 402 items, corresponding to 9.2% of total medications presented in surveyed households. The majority of expired medications (64.7%) was in solid dosage (tablets, capsules, granules, lozenges), following semisolid (ointments, creams, gel, suppositories) and liquid dosage forms (drops, syrups). Expired medications in the households belonged mostly to 3 categories: antimicrobials for systemic use (16.7%), dermatological preparation (15.9%) and medications for alimentary tract and metabolism (14.2%). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that there were relatively large quantities of expired medications in Serbian households, with a high prevalence of antibiotics for systemic use, anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic products, and medications for alimentary tract and metabolism.