Chronic Hepatitis B Finite Treatment: Similar and Different Concerns With New Drug Classes.

Chronic hepatitis B, a major cause of liver disease and cancer, affects >250 million people worldwide. Currently there is no cure, only suppressive therapies. Efforts to develop finite curative hepatitis B virus (HBV) therapies are underway, consisting of combinations of multiple novel agents with or without nucleos(t)ide reverse-transcriptase inhibitors. The HBV Forum convened a webinar in July 2021, along with subsequent working group discussions to address how and when to stop finite therapy for demonstration of sustained off-treatment efficacy and safety responses. Participants included leading experts in academia, clinical practice, pharmaceutical companies, patient representatives, and regulatory agencies. This Viewpoints article outlines areas of consensus within our multistakeholder group for stopping finite therapies in chronic hepatitis B investigational studies, including trial design, patient selection, outcomes, biomarkers, predefined stopping criteria, predefined retreatment criteria, duration of investigational therapies, and follow-up after stopping therapy. Future research of unmet needs are discussed.

JNJ-73763989 and bersacapavir treatment in nucleos(t)ide analogue-suppressed patients with chronic hepatitis B: REEF-2.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Functional cure for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) requires finite treatment. Two agents under investigation with the goal of achieving functional cure are the small-interfering RNA JNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) and the capsid assembly modulator JNJ-56136379 (JNJ-6379; bersacapavir). METHODS: REEF-2, a phase IIb, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study, enrolled 130 nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA)-suppressed hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg)-negative patients with CHB who received JNJ-3989 (200 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks) + JNJ-6379 (250 mg oral daily) + NA (oral daily; active arm) or placebos for JNJ-3989 and JNJ-6379 +active NA (control arm) for 48 weeks followed by 48 weeks off-treatment follow-up. RESULTS: At follow-up Week 24, no patients achieved the primary endpoint of functional cure (off-treatment hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg] seroclearance). No patients achieved functional cure at follow-up Week 48. There was a pronounced on-treatment reduction in mean HBsAg from baseline at Week 48 in the active arm vs. no decline in the control arm (1.89 vs. 0.06 log10 IU/ml; p = 0.001). At follow-up Week 48, reductions from baseline were >1 log10 IU/ml in 81.5% vs. 12.5% of patients in the active and control arms, respectively, and 38/81 (46.9%) patients in the active arm achieved HBsAg <100 IU/ml vs. 6/40 (15.0%) patients in the control arm. Off-treatment HBV DNA relapse and alanine aminotransferase increases were less frequent in the active arm, with 7/77 (9.1%) and 11/41 (26.8%) patients in the active and control arms, respectively, restarting NAs during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Finite 48-week treatment with JNJ-3989 + JNJ-6379 + NA resulted in fewer and less severe post-treatment HBV DNA increases and alanine aminotransferase flares, and a higher proportion of patients with off-treatment HBV DNA suppression, with or without HBsAg suppression, but did not result in functional cure. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: Achieving a functional cure from chronic hepatitis B (CHB) with finite treatments is a major unmet medical need. The current study assessed the rate of functional cure and clinical outcome after controlled nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) withdrawal in patients with low levels of HBsAg induced by 48 weeks of treatment with the small-interfering RNA JNJ-3989 and the capsid assembly modulator JNJ-6379 plus NA vs. patients who only received NA treatment. Though functional cure was not achieved by any patient in either arm, the 48-week treatment regimen of JNJ-3989, JNJ-6379, and NA did result in more patients achieving pronounced reductions in HBsAg, with clinically meaningful reductions maintained for up to 48 weeks off all treatments, as well as fewer off-treatment HBV DNA increases and alanine aminotransferase flares. These findings provide valuable insights for future studies investigating potential finite treatment options, while the reported efficacy and safety outcomes may be of interest to healthcare providers making treatment decisions for patients with NA-suppressed HBeAg-negative CHB. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT04129554.

MAJIC: a phase III trial of acalabrutinib + venetoclax versus venetoclax + obinutuzumab in previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma.

Here we describe the rationale and design of MAJIC, a phase III, prospective, multicenter, randomized trial comparing the combination of the BTK inhibitor acalabrutinib plus the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax versus the combination of venetoclax plus obinutuzumab as frontline treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma. In both treatment arms, disease response (assessed by International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia criteria) and minimal residual disease will be used to guide therapy duration, with all patients ultimately discontinuing treatment after a maximum of 2 years. The primary end point is progression-free survival. Key secondary end points include rates of undetectable minimal residual disease, overall response and overall survival. This study will address key unanswered questions in frontline chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma therapy by investigating the optimal duration of finite treatment and identifying the optimal venetoclax doublet regimen.

This article describes the design of the MAJIC clinical trial, which investigates two different treatment combinations for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) who have not received treatment for their disease previously. Patients will be randomized (put into a group by chance) to receive either acalabrutinib + venetoclax (AV) or venetoclax + obinutuzumab (VO). VO is already an approved initial treatment option for CLL/SLL. Acalabrutinib is also an approved initial treatment option when given by itself, but the AV combination is not yet approved. We are doing this study to better understand and directly compare how well AV and VO work when used for the treatment of CLL/SLL. A test done on the blood and bone marrow called 'minimal residual disease' will be used to help guide the length of time that patients receive treatment. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05057494 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Long-term response after stopping tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in non-cirrhotic HBeAg-negative patients - FINITE study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: There is currently no virological cure for chronic hepatitis B but successful nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) therapy can suppress hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA replication and, in some cases, result in HBsAg loss. Stopping NA therapy often leads to viral relapse and therefore life-long therapy is usually required. This study investigated the potential to discontinue tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) therapy in HBeAg-negative patients. METHODS: Non-cirrhotic HBeAg-negative patients who had received TDF for ≥4years, with suppressed HBV DNA for ≥3.5years, were randomly assigned to either stop (n=21) or continue (n=21) TDF monotherapy. Standard laboratory tests including HBV DNA viral load, HBsAg and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) measurements, and adverse event reporting were carried out during treatment and post-treatment follow-up for 144weeks. RESULTS: Of the patients who stopped TDF therapy, 62% (n=13) remained off-therapy to Week 144. Median HBsAg change in this group was -0.59log10IU/ml (range -4.49 to 0.02log10IU/ml) vs. 0.21log10IU/ml in patients who continued TDF therapy. Four patients (19%) achieved HBsAg loss. Patients stopping therapy had initial fluctuations in viral load and ALT; however, at Week 144, 43% (n=9) had either achieved HBsAg loss or had HBV DNA <2,000IU/ml. There were no unexpected safety issues identified with stopping TDF therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This controlled study demonstrated the potential for HBsAg loss and/or sustained virological response in non-cirrhotic HBeAg-negative patients stopping long-term TDF therapy. Lay summary: Nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) is usually a life-long therapy for HBV patients. This randomised controlled study investigated the discontinuation of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) therapy in HBeAg-negative patients. Of the patients who stopped TDF therapy, 62% remained off-therapy to Week 144, of which 43% of patients had achieved either HBsAg loss or HBV DNA <2,000IU/ml. This offers a potential for long-term HBV-suppressed patients without cirrhosis to stop NA therapy under strict surveillance. Clinical trial number: NCT01320943.

Long-Term Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Profile and Seroclearance Following Antiviral Treatment: A Single-Center, Real-World Cohort Study.

Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance, an indicator of recovery from hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, is uncommon in long-term nucleos(t)ide analog (NUC) therapy. We compared the incidence of HBsAg seroclearance in patients with and without NUC discontinuation to identify predictors of HBsAg seroclearance. This retrospective study enrolled adult patients with a chronic HBV infection followed for ≥12 months after NUC discontinuation (finite group) and those treated with NUCs for >3 years (non-finite group). Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were analyzed. The study cohort included 978 patients, including 509 and 469 patients in the finite and non-finite groups, respectively. Cumulative HBsAg seroclearance incidence was significantly higher in the finite group than in the non-finite group (p = 0.006). The 5- and 10-year cumulative HBsAg seroclearance incidence were 6.6% and 18.9% in the finite group and 3% and 14.6% in the non-finite group, respectively. The likelihood of HBsAg seroclearance was higher in those with end of treatment (EOT) HBsAg levels of <100 IU/mL and in those without clinical relapse (CR). The cumulative 3-year CR incidence was 16.8%. The incidence of liver decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma were 4.1 and 0.4 per 1000 person-years, respectively. The hepatocellular carcinoma incidence did not significantly differ between the finite and non-finite groups (p = 0.941). In conclusion, higher HBsAg seroclearance incidence in patients receiving finite therapy, and the increased likelihood of HBsAg seroclearance in those with EOT HBsAg levels of <100 IU/mL and in those without CR should be considered during decision-making of treatment options.

Chronic Hepatitis B Relapse Rates after Cessation of Tenofovir Alafenamide and Entecavir Therapy.

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) relapse occurs after the cessation of nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUC) therapy due to the waning of viral suppression. Few studies have investigated the viral relapse rate and clinical relapse rate after tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) therapy. We compared the CHB relapse rate between TAF and entecavir therapy. We enrolled patients with chronic hepatitis B who underwent TAF or entecavir therapy. NUC therapy was terminated after HBeAg loss for 1 year in HBeAg-positive patients and after undetectable serum HBV DNA on three separate tests each >6 months apart in HBeAg-negative patients. After cessation of NUC therapy, we followed alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels at 12, 24, and 48 weeks. Serum HBV DNA levels were checked if patients showed a two-fold elevation from the upper limit of normal ALT levels (41 IU/mL). Clinical relapse (CR) was defined as a two-fold elevation in ALT levels and HBV DNA levels > 2000 IU/mL. We then investigated the CR rate of HBV after cessation of TAF and entecavir therapy at 12, 24, and 48 weeks. Of the 117 patients enrolled, 78 were in the entecavir group and 39 were in the TAF group. At 12 weeks after cessation of NUC therapy, no patients had HBV CR in the entecavir group. However, three patients (CR cumulative rate 7.9%) had CR in the TAF group. At 24 weeks, the CR cumulative rate in the entecavir and TAF groups were 1.3% and 13.2%, respectively (p < 0.05). At 48 weeks, the CR cumulative rates were 9.2% and 24.2%, respectively (p = 0.055). Patients in the TAF group had a higher cumulative rate of CR than those in the entecavir group (log-rank p = 0.023). Furthermore, patients in the TAF group had earlier CR times than those in the entecavir group, especially in the first 24 weeks after cessation of therapies (p < 0.05). The cessation of TAF therapy had significantly earlier and higher CR rates than that of entecavir therapy. Close monitoring of liver function and HBV DNA levels may be necessary, especially within 24 weeks after cessation of TAF therapy.

Serious adverse events after cessation of nucleos(t)ide analogues in individuals with chronic hepatitis B: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background & Aims: The risk of serious clinical outcomes following cessation of nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUCs) in individuals with chronic hepatitis B remains poorly characterized. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate current literature on this issue. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for NUC stop studies that noted clinical outcomes published between January 1, 2006 and August 18, 2022. We performed meta-research analyses to examine the relationships of reported outcomes with study designs and characteristics and also pooled studies with non-overlapping populations to provide risk estimates for the proportions of (1) severe hepatitis flares or hepatic decompensation or (2) hepatitis flare-related death or liver transplantation. Results: The meta-research analysis included 50 studies of highly heterogeneous designs and characteristics. We found that reporting of safety outcomes varied widely according to outcome definition, follow-up duration, and sample size. Only ten studies prespecified safety events as the study outcome, and only four had an outcome definition to include hepatic insufficiency, a follow-up duration >12 months, and a sample size >100 patients. We further pooled 15 studies with 4,525 individuals and estimated that severe hepatitis flares or decompensation would occur in 1.21% (95% CI 0.70-2.08%), with significant heterogeneity (I 2 = 54%, p <0.01), while hepatitis flare-related death or liver transplantation would occur in 0.37% (95% CI 0.20-0.67%), without significant heterogeneity (I 2 = 0.00%, p = 1.00). Conclusions: Current literature on the risk of serious clinical outcomes following NUC cessation is very limited and highly heterogeneous. Pooled analyses of available data found approximately 1% of patients who stopped NUCs developed severe flares or hepatic decompensation. Impact and implications: Current literature regarding the safety concerns surrounding NUC cessation for individuals with chronic hepatitis B is limited and heterogeneous in designs and characteristics, and thus should be interpreted with great caution. Based on currently available data, the proportion of patients that develop severe hepatitis flares or hepatic decompensation was estimated at 1.21% and that of flare-related death or liver transplantation at 0.37%. Our findings are important for individuals receiving nucleos(t)ide analogues for hepatitis B virus infection because we not only pooled currently available data to estimate the risk of serious clinical adverse events following treatment cessation but also uncovered critical limitations of existing literature regarding the safety of finite therapy.

Discontinuation of antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis B patients.

Nucleos(t)ide analogs (NUC) are the first-line therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) recommended by most current guidelines. NUC therapy decreases progression of liver disease, reduces the risk of liver-related complications, and improves the quality of life of patients with CHB. Although indefinite or long-term NUC therapy is usually recommended, this strategy raises several concerns, such as side-effects, adherence, costs, and patient willingness to stop therapy. Recent data showed the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of stopping antiviral therapy in carefully selected CHB patients, leading to its incorporation in international guidelines. Patients who discontinue NUC have a higher likelihood of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss compared to patients who continue on therapy. Recommendations pertaining endpoints allowing safety discontinuation of NUC therapy differ among international guidelines. For hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients, durable HBeAg seroconversion is considered an acceptable treatment endpoint. For HBeAg-negative patients, some guidelines propose undetectability hepatitis B virus DNA for at least 2 or 3 years, while others consider HBsAg loss as the only acceptable endpoint. CHB patients who stop therapy should remain under strict clinical and laboratorial follow-up protocols to detect and manage relapses in a timely manner. No reliable predictor of relapse has been consistently identified to date, although quantitative HBsAg has been increasingly studied as a reliable biomarker to predict safe NUC discontinuation.

APASL guidance on stopping nucleos(t)ide analogues in chronic hepatitis B patients.

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is currently incurable. Long-term treatment with potent and safe nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) can reduce hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cirrhosis-related complications through profound viral suppression. However, indefinite therapy raises several crucial issues with pros and cons. Because seroclearance of hepatitis B surface (HBsAg) as functional cure is not easily achievable, a finite therapy including sequential 48-week pegylated interferon therapy may provide an opportunity to facilitate HBsAg seroclearance by the rejuvenation of exhausted immune cells. However, the cost of stopping NA is the high incidence of virological relapse and surge of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, which may increase the risk of adverse outcomes (e.g., decompensation, fibrosis progression, HCC, or liver-related mortality). So far, the APASL criteria to stop NA treatment is undetectable HBV DNA levels with normalization of ALT; however, this criterion for cessation of treatment is associated with various incidence rates of virological/clinical relapse and more than 40% of NA-stoppers eventually receive retreatment. A very intensive follow-up strategy and identification of low-risk patients for virological/clinical relapse by different biomarkers are the keys to stop the NA treatment safely. Recent studies suggested that decreasing HBsAg level at the end-of-treatment to < 100-200 IU/mL seems to be a useful marker for deciding when to discontinue NAs therapy. In addition, several viral and host factors have been reviewed for their potential roles in predicting clinical relapse. Finally, the APASL guidance has proposed rules to stop NA and the subsequent follow-up strategy to achieve a better prognosis after stopping NA. In general, for both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients who have stopped treatment, these measurements should be done every 1-3 months at the minimum until 12 months.