Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 67
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Card Fail ; 2024 Jul 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38977056

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess the association between the use of adaptive pacing on clinical and economic outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) recipients in a real-world analysis. BACKGROUND: The adaptivCRT (aCRT) algorithm was shown in prior subgroup analyses of prospective trials to achieve clinical benefits, but a large prospective trial showed nonsignificant changes in the endpoint of mortality or hospitalizations due to heart failure. METHODS: CRT-implanted patients from the Optum Clinformatics database with ≥ 90 days of follow-up were included. Remote monitoring data were used to classify patients based on CRT setting-adaptive biventricular and left ventricular pacing (aCRT) vs standard biventricular pacing (Standard CRT). Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for baseline differences between groups. Mortality, 30-day readmissions, health care use, and payer and patients' costs were evaluated post-implantation. RESULTS: This study included 2412 aCRT and 1638 Standard CRT patients (mean follow-up: 2.4 ± 1.4 years), with balanced baseline characteristics after adjustment. The aCRT group was associated with lower all-cause mortality rates (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI):0.80, 0.96]), fewer all-cause 30-day readmissions (adjusted incidence rate ratio = 0.87 [CI:0.81, 0.94]), and fewer all-cause and HF-related inpatient, outpatient and emergency department visits. The aCRT cohort was also associated with lower all-cause outpatient payer-paid amounts and lower all-cause and HF-related inpatient and emergency department patient-paid amounts. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective analysis of a large real-world cohort, the use of an adaptive CRT algorithm was associated with lower mortality rates, reduced health care resource use and lower payer and patient costs.

2.
Headache ; 64(4): 361-373, 2024 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38523435

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate unmet needs among individuals with episodic migraine (EM) in the United States (US). BACKGROUND: Data are limited on the impact of headache frequency (HF) and preventive treatment failure (TF) on the burden of migraine in the US. METHODS: A retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of 2019 National Health and Wellness Survey (NHWS) data was conducted from an opt-in online survey that identified respondents (aged ≥18 years) in the US with self-reported physician-diagnosed migraine. Participants were stratified by HF (low: 0-3 days/month; moderate-to-high: 4-14 days/month) and prior preventive TF (preventive naive; 0-1 TF; ≥2 TFs). Comparisons were conducted between preventive TF groups using multivariable regression models controlling for patient demographic and health characteristics. RESULTS: Among individuals with moderate-to-high frequency EM, the NHWS identified 397 with ≥2 TFs, 334 with 0-1 TF, and 356 as preventive naive. The 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (version 2) Physical Component Summary scores were significantly lower among those with ≥2 TFs, at a mean (standard error [SE]) of 41.4 [0.8] versus the preventive-naive 46.8 [0.9] and 0-1 TF 44.5 [0.9] groups; p < 0.001 for both). Migraine Disability Assessment Scale scores were significantly higher in the ≥2 TFs, at a mean (SE) of 37.7 (3.9) versus preventive-naive 26.8 (2.9) (p < 0.001) and 0-1 TF 30.1 (3.3) (p = 0.011) groups. The percentages of time that respondents experienced absenteeism (mean [SE] 21.6% [5.5%] vs. 13.4% [3.6%]; p = 0.022), presenteeism (mean [SE] 55.0% [8.3%] vs. 40.8% [6.5%]; p = 0.015), overall work impairment (mean [SE] 59.4% [5.6%] vs. 45.0% [4.4%]; p < 0.001), and activity impairment (mean [SE] 56.8% [1.0%] vs. 44.4% [0.9%]; p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the ≥2 TFs versus preventive-naive group. Emergency department visits (preventive-naive, p = 0.006; 0-1 TF, p = 0.008) and hospitalizations (p < 0.001 both) in the past 6 months were significantly higher in the ≥2 TFs group. Direct and indirect costs were significantly higher in the ≥2 TFs (mean [SE] $24,026 [3460]; $22,074 [20]) versus 0-1 TF ($10,897 [1636]; $17,965 [17]) and preventive-naive ($11,497 [1715]; $17,167 [17]) groups (p < 0.001 for all). Results were similar in the low-frequency EM group. CONCLUSIONS: In this NHWS analysis, individuals with more prior preventive TFs experienced significantly higher humanistic and economic burden regardless of HF.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Migrañosos , Calidad de Vida , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Migrañosos/prevención & control , Trastornos Migrañosos/economía , Femenino , Estados Unidos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Transversales , Costo de Enfermedad , Adulto Joven , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Adolescente , Personas con Discapacidad
3.
Euro Surveill ; 29(39)2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39328156

RESUMEN

BackgroundRespiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of acute respiratory infections and hospitalisations in infants (age < 1 year) and young children. Little is known on RSV epidemiology and related inpatient healthcare resource use (HCRU) in Switzerland.AimTo explore RSV-related hospitalisations, inpatient HCRU and medical costs in all age groups, and risk factors for infant hospitalisations in Switzerland.MethodsWe used national hospital registry data from 2003 to 2021 identifying RSV cases with ICD-10-GM codes, and described demographic characteristics, HCRU and associated medical costs of RSV inpatients. The effect of risk factors on infant hospitalisation was estimated with logistic regression.ResultsWe observed a general increase and biannual pattern in RSV hospitalisations between 2003/04 and 2018/19, with 3,575 hospitalisations in 2018/19 and 2,487 in 2019/20 before numbers declined in 2020/21 (n = 902). Around two thirds of all hospitalisations occurred in infants. Mean (median) age was 118 (85) days in hospitalised infants and 74 (77) years in hospitalised adult patients (> 18 years); 7.2% of cases required intensive care unit stay. Mean inpatient medical costs were estimated at EUR 8,046. Most (90.8%) hospitalised infants with RSV were born after 35 weeks of gestation without bronchopulmonary dysplasia or congenital heart disease. Low birth weight, gestational age and congenital disorders were associated with a higher risk for hospitalisation.ConclusionsRSV leads to a substantial number of hospitalisations and peaks in hospital capacity utilisation. Measures to protect all infants from an RSV hospitalisation are essential in addressing this public health challenge.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización , Pacientes Internos , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio , Virus Sincitial Respiratorio Humano , Humanos , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/epidemiología , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/economía , Suiza/epidemiología , Lactante , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Femenino , Masculino , Preescolar , Niño , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adolescente , Virus Sincitial Respiratorio Humano/aislamiento & purificación , Anciano , Factores de Riesgo , Recién Nacido , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven , Sistema de Registros , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/epidemiología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/virología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Costo de Enfermedad , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos
4.
Headache ; 63(7): 908-916, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37314065

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe differences in clinical and demographic characteristics between patients with episodic migraine (EM) or chronic migraine (CM) and determine the effect of migraine subtype on patient-reported outcome measures (PROM). BACKGROUND: Prior studies have characterized migraine in the general population. While this provides a basis for our understanding of migraine, we have less insight into the characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes of migraine patients who present to subspecialty headache clinics. These patients represent a subset of the population that bears the greatest burden of migraine disability and are more representative of migraine patients who seek medical care. Valuable insights can be gained from a better understanding of CM and EM in this population. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study of patients with CM or EM seen in the Cleveland Clinic Headache Center between January 2012 and June 2017. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and patient-reported outcome measures (3-Level European Quality of Life 5-Dimension [EQ-5D-3L], Headache Impact Test-6 [HIT-6], Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9]) were compared between groups. RESULTS: Eleven thousand thirty-seven patients who had 29,032 visits were included. More CM patients reported being on disability 517/3652 (14.2%) than EM patients 249/4881 (5.1%) and had significantly worse mean HIT-6 (67.3 ± 7.4 vs. 63.1 ± 7.4, p < 0.001) and median [interquartile range] EQ-5D-3L (0.77 [0.44-0.82] vs. 0.83 [0.77-1.00], p < 0.001), and PHQ-9 (10 [6-16] vs. 5 [2-10], p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There are multiple differences in demographic characteristics and comorbid conditions between patients with CM and EM. After adjustment for these factors, CM patients had higher PHQ-9 scores, lower quality of life scores, greater disability, and greater work restrictions/unemployment.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Migrañosos , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trastornos Migrañosos/epidemiología , Trastornos Migrañosos/terapia , Cefalea , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Enfermedad Crónica
5.
Cancer ; 128(3): 519-528, 2022 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34605020

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: No study has focused on the economic burden in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) survivors, even though this knowledge is essential. This study reports on health care resource use and associated health care costs as well as related factors in a series of 1671 French long-term NHL survivors. METHODS: Health care costs were measured from the payer perspective. Only direct medical costs (medical consultations, outpatient treatments, hospitalizations, and medical transport) in the past 12 months were included (reference year 2015). Multiple linear regression was used to search for explanatory factors of health care costs. RESULTS: In total, 1100 survivors (66%) reported having used at least 1 health care resource, and 867 (52%) reported having used at least 1 outpatient treatment. After the authors accounted for missing data, the mean health care cost was estimated at €702 ± €2221. Hospitalizations and outpatient treatments were the main cost drivers. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. For the 1100 survivors who reported using at least 1 health care resource, the mean health care cost was €1067 ± €2268. Several factors demonstrated statistically significant relationships with health care costs. For instance, cardiovascular disorders increased costs by 66% ± 16%. In contrast, rituximab or autologous stem cell transplantation as initial therapy had no effect on health care costs. CONCLUSIONS: The consideration of economic constraints in health care is now a reality. This retrospective study reports on a better understanding of health care resource use and associated health care costs as well as related factors. It may help health care professionals in their ongoing efforts to design person-centered health care pathways.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Linfoma no Hodgkin , Linfoma , Estudios Transversales , Estrés Financiero , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Linfoma no Hodgkin/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sobrevivientes , Trasplante Autólogo
6.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 86(2): 373-378, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34246700

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: As the United States becomes more diverse, determining differences in health care utilization and costs in the management of skin cancers is fundamental to decision-making in health care resource allocation and improving care for underserved populations. OBJECTIVE: To compare health care use and costs among non-Hispanic White, Hispanic White, and non-Hispanic Black patients with keratinocyte carcinoma. METHODS: A nationwide cross-sectional study was performed using Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data from 1996 to 2015. RESULTS: Among 54,503,447 patients with keratinocyte carcinoma (weighted) over a 20-year period, 53,134,351 (97%) were non-Hispanic White; 836,030 (1.5%) were Hispanic White; and 170,755 (0.3%) were non-Hispanic Black. Compared to non-Hispanic White patients, Hispanic White patients had significantly more ambulatory visits per person per year (5.4 vs 3.5, P = .003). Compared to non-Hispanic White patients, non-Hispanic Black patients had significantly more ambulatory visits (13.1 vs 3.5, P = .027) and emergency department visits (2.3 vs 1.1, P < .001), and incurred significantly higher ambulatory costs ($5089 vs $1131, P = .05), medication costs ($523 vs $221, P = .022), and total costs per person per year ($13,430 vs $1290, P = .032). LIMITATIONS: Data for squamous cell carcinomas and basal cell carcinomas are combined. CONCLUSIONS: Keratinocyte carcinoma was more costly to treat and required more health care resources in non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic White patients than in non-Hispanic White patients.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Basocelular , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Carcinoma Basocelular/terapia , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Queratinocitos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Neoplasias Cutáneas/terapia , Estados Unidos
7.
Future Oncol ; 2022 Nov 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36331578

RESUMEN

Aim: Treatment options for triple-class exposed (TCE) patients with multiple myeloma (MM) in Japan are limited. Materials & methods: Retrospective observational study using the Medical Data Vision database (April 2008-April 2021). Eligible adults with MM received a new post-TCE treatment. Treatments, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs (per patient per month [PPPM]) were analyzed with subgroup analyses by prior stem cell transplantation (SCT vs No SCT). Results: Of 459 TCE patients, 216 (47%) had post-TCE treatment of whom 194 (90%) had no prior SCT. Median duration of the first post-TCE line of therapy (LOT) was 2 months; 49% of No SCT patients received a subsequent LOT. Total healthcare costs were comparable between No SCT and SCT groups (¥1.3 million PPPM each; US$12,328 and $12,391, respectively), driven by treatment costs. Median post-index overall survival (n = 216) was 15.8 months (95% CI: 10.5, 22.3). Conclusion: New treatments with better effectiveness are needed for patients with TCE MM in Japan.


Treatment options are limited for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) in Japan who have received the 3 classes of drugs known as immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, and are considered to be 'triple-class exposed' (TCE). The objective of this study was to understand the characteristics of this patient population and the treatments they received after becoming TCE. The study evaluated healthcare resources and costs and considered whether patients had received stem cell transplant as their first treatment, where cells that may differentiate into blood cells are administered. This study analyzed a database of anonymous patients' medical records collected from April 2008 through April 2021 in Japan. A total of 216 patients were included, of whom 194 never received stem cell transplantation. Patients who received treatment after being considered TCE received that first treatment for a median of 2 months. All patients who received treatment after TCE had a median overall survival of 15.8 months meaning half the patients were still alive after receiving treatment at 15.8 months. Patients who did not have a stem cell transplant after diagnosis had a median overall survival of 17.4 months. Healthcare resources were similar between groups, except those who did not have stem cell transplantation after diagnosis needed more medications. Both groups had total healthcare costs of ¥1.3 million per patient per month. These findings support the need for new treatments and future studies to understand how new treatments would help TCE relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma patients in Japan.

8.
J Pediatr ; 207: 169-175.e2, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30612815

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare health care use and spending in children using vs not using respiratory medical equipment and supplies (RMES). STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study of 20 352 children age 1-18 years continuously enrolled in Medicaid in 2013 from 12 states in the Truven Medicaid MarketScan Database; 7060 children using RMES were propensity score matched with 13 292 without RMES. Home RMES use was identified with Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System and International Classification of Diseases codes. RMES use was regressed on annual per-member-per-year Medicaid payments, adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics, including underlying respiratory and other complex chronic conditions. RESULTS: Of children requiring RMES, 47% used oxygen, 28% suction, 22% noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation, 17% tracheostomy, 8% ventilator, 5% mechanical in-exsufflator, and 4% high-frequency chest wall oscillator. Most children (93%) using RMES had a chronic condition; 26% had ≥6. The median per-member-per-year payments in matched children with vs without RMES were $24 359 vs $13 949 (P < .001). In adjusted analyses, payment increased significantly (P < .001 for all) with mechanical in-exsufflator (+$2657), tracheostomy (+$6447), suction (+$7341), chest wall oscillator (+$8925), and ventilator (+$20 530). Those increased payments were greater than the increase associated with a coded respiratory chronic condition (+$2709). Hospital and home health care were responsible for the greatest differences in payment (+$3799 and +$3320, respectively) between children with and without RMES. CONCLUSION: The use of RMES is associated with high health care spending, especially with hospital and home health care. Population health initiatives in children may benefit from consideration of RMES in comprehensive risk assessment for health care spending.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud del Niño/provisión & distribución , Enfermedad Crónica/terapia , Recursos en Salud/provisión & distribución , Ventilación no Invasiva/instrumentación , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Terapia Respiratoria/instrumentación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
9.
Cancer ; 124(10): 2104-2114, 2018 05 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29505670

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The current study was performed to describe patient characteristics, treatment patterns, survival, health care resource use (HRU), and costs among older women in the United States with advanced (American Joint Committee on Cancer stage III/IV) triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database. METHODS: Women who were aged ≥66 years at the time of diagnosis and diagnosed with advanced TNBC between January 1, 2007, and January 1, 2011, in the SEER-Medicare database and who were followed for survival through December 31, 2013, were eligible. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics at the time of diagnosis, subsequent treatment patterns, and survival outcomes were analyzed. HRU and costs for the first 3 months after diagnosis, the last 3 months of life, and the time in between are summarized. All analyses were stratified by American Joint Committee on Cancer stage of disease. RESULTS: There were 1244 patients newly diagnosed with advanced TNBC; the majority were aged ≥75 years (61% with stage III disease and 57.4% with stage IV disease) and white (>70% of patients in both disease stage groups). The most common treatment approaches were surgery combined with chemotherapy for patients for stage III disease (50.6%) and chemotherapy alone or with radiotherapy for patients with stage IV disease (31.3%). Diverse chemotherapy regimens were administered for each line of therapy; nevertheless, the medications used were consistent with national guidelines. Patients with stage III and stage IV disease were found to have a similar mean number of hospitalizations and outpatient visits, but mean monthly costs were greater for patients with stage IV disease at all 3 time points. The mean cost per patient-month (in 2013 US dollars) was $4810 for patients with stage III disease and $9159 for patients with stage IV disease. CONCLUSIONS: Among older women with advanced TNBC, significant treatment variations and considerable HRU and costs exist. Further research is needed to find effective treatments with which to reduce the clinical and economic burden of this disease. Cancer 2018;124:2104-14. © 2018 American Cancer Society.


Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/economía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economía , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/economía , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/economía , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Ahorro de Costo , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Mastectomía/economía , Mastectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/economía , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Programa de VERF/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/terapia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
10.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) ; 27(5): e12862, 2018 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29927010

RESUMEN

This study evaluated the patterns of care and health care resource use (HCRU) in patients with metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) who received ≥3 lines of systemic therapy in the United Kingdom (UK). Oncologists (n = 40) abstracted medical records for patients with metastatic SCCHN who initiated third-line systemic therapy during 1 January 2011-30 August 2014 (n = 220). Patient characteristics, treatment patterns and SCCHN-related HCRU were summarised descriptively for the metastatic period; exploratory multivariable regression analyses were conducted on select HCRU outcomes. At metastatic diagnosis, most patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) of 0/1 (95%). For patients with PS 0/1, the most common first-line treatment was cisplatin+5-fluorouracil (5-FU); docetaxel was the most common second- and third-line treatment. For patients with PS ≥ 2, the most common first-, second-, and third-line treatments were carboplatin+5-FU, cetuximab, and methotrexate, respectively. Most patients received supportive care during (85%) and after (89%) therapy. This study provides useful information, prior to the availability of immunotherapy, on patient characteristics, treatment patterns, HCRU, and survival in a real-world UK population with metastatic SCCHN receiving ≥3 lines of systemic therapy. Patterns of care and HCRU varied among patients with metastatic SCCHN; specific systemic therapies varied by patient PS.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Servicio de Oncología en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados Paliativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Reino Unido , Adulto Joven
11.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 18(1): 147, 2018 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29490654

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Data are scarce regarding real-world health care resource use (HCRU) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). An understanding of current clinical practices and HCRU is needed to provide a benchmark for rapidly evolving NSCLC management recommendations and therapeutic options. The objective of this study was to describe real-world HCRU for patients with advanced NSCLC. METHODS: This multinational, retrospective chart review study was conducted at academic and community oncology sites in Italy, Spain, Germany, Australia, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and Brazil. Deidentified data were drawn from medical records of 1440 adults (≥18 years old) who initiated systemic therapy (2011 to mid-2013) for a new, confirmed diagnosis of advanced or metastatic (stage IIIB or IV) NSCLC. We summarized HCRU associated with first and subsequent lines of systemic therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC. RESULTS: The proportion of patients who were hospitalized at least once varied by country from 24% in Italy to 81% in Japan during first-line therapy and from 22% in Italy to 84% in Japan during second-line therapy; overall hospitalization frequency was 2.5-11.1 per 100 patient-weeks, depending on country. Emergency visit frequency also varied among countries (overall from 0.3-5.9 per 100 patient-weeks), increasing consistently from first- through third-line therapy in each country. The outpatient setting was the most common setting of resource use. Most patients in the study had multiple outpatient visits in association with each line of therapy (overall from 21.1 to 59.0 outpatient visits per 100 patient-weeks, depending on country). The use of health care resources showed no regular pattern associated with results of tests for activating mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements. CONCLUSIONS: HCRU varied across countries. These findings suggest differing approaches to the clinical management of advanced NSCLC among the eight countries. Comparative findings and an understanding of country-specific clinical practices can help to identify areas of need and guide future resource allocation for patients with advanced NSCLC. Further studies evaluating the costs associated with resource use are warranted.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/terapia , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Anciano , Australia , Brasil , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Femenino , Alemania , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Italia , Japón , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , República de Corea , Estudios Retrospectivos , España , Taiwán
12.
BMC Fam Pract ; 18(1): 60, 2017 May 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28476151

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to investigate patterns of health care resource use by patients before and after a diagnosis of CFS/ME, as recorded by Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GP practices in the UK. METHODS: We used a case-control study design in which patients who had a first recorded diagnosis of CFS/ME during the period 01/01/2001 to 31/12/2013 were matched 1:1 with controls by age, sex, and GP practice. We compared rates of GP consultations, diagnostic tests, prescriptions, referrals, and symptoms between the two groups from 15 years (in adults) or 10 years (in children) before diagnosis to 10 years after diagnosis. RESULTS: Data were available for 6710 adult and 916 child (age <18 years) matched case-control pairs. Rates of GP consultations, diagnostic tests, prescriptions, referrals, and symptoms spiked dramatically in the year when a CFS/ME diagnosis was recorded. GP consultation rates were 50% higher in adult cases compared to controls 11-15 years before diagnosis (rate ratio (RR) 1.49 (95% CI 1.46, 1.52)) and 56% higher 6-10 years after diagnosis (RR 1.56 (1.54, 1.57)). In children, consultation rates in cases were 45% higher 6-10 years before diagnosis (RR 1.45 (1.40, 1.51)) and 62% higher 6-10 years after diagnosis (RR 1.62 (1.54, 1.70)). For adults and children, rates of tests, prescriptions, referrals, and symptoms were higher in cases compared to controls for up to 10 years before and after diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Adults and children with CFS/ME have greater health care needs than the rest of the population for at least ten years before their diagnosis, and these higher levels of health care resource use continue for at least ten years after diagnosis.


Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Síndrome de Fatiga Crónica/terapia , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores Socioeconómicos , Reino Unido
13.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 73(4): 585-593.e3, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26253364

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Comprehensive studies on costs of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (MSPP) have not been conducted in the United States. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate current health care resource use, productivity, and costs among patients with MSPP in routine practice. METHODS: A total of 200 adults seeking MSPP treatment enrolled in 9 US sites. Consented patients reported symptoms, treatment, lost productivity, and costs; 6-month retrospective chart review captured health care resource use and clinical characteristics. Costs were assigned to health care resource use and lost productivity using standard algorithms. Differences by Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) group, based on PASI score (≤10, >10-≤20, >20) at enrollment, were evaluated. Analyses included descriptive statistics and analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis tests. RESULTS: Most patients (79.5%) were prescribed 1 or more MSPP medications (mean: 1.5); 36.0% and 9.0% received self-administered biologics and systemic therapies, respectively. Mean number of nonprescription treatments was 12.3. Differences by PASI group were observed for overall work and activity impairment (P < .02). Six-month total MSPP direct costs per patient were $11,291; indirect costs were $2101 and differed across PASI groups (P = .0008). LIMITATIONS: This study enrolled patients with MSPP actively seeking care. CONCLUSION: Despite treatment, a number of patients with MSPP continue to experience moderate to severe PASI scores, impaired functioning, and high costs suggesting a need for new treatment options.


Asunto(s)
Absentismo , Costo de Enfermedad , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Recursos en Salud/economía , Psoriasis/economía , Psoriasis/terapia , Adulto , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Estudios Transversales , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/economía , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia PUVA/economía , Terapia PUVA/métodos , Psoriasis/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Perfil de Impacto de Enfermedad , Estados Unidos
14.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 12(1): 135-145.e9, 2024 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37797715

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Asthma, affecting more than 330 million people worldwide, is associated with a high level of morbidity, mortality, and socioeconomic costs. OBJECTIVE: In this cross-sectional study, we analyzed the comorbidity burden in patients with severe asthma compared with nonsevere asthma and investigated the role of corticosteroid use on the risk of comorbidities. METHODS: All adults (≥18 y) with a diagnosis of asthma (International Classification of Diseases-10th revision code J45.x) between 2014 and 2017 were identified and data were collected until 2018 from Finnish nationwide registers. Asthma was defined as continuously or transiently severe or nonsevere based on annual dispensed inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), oral corticosteroids (OCS), and hospitalizations. RESULTS: Of 193,730 adult identified patients diagnosed with asthma, 86.3% had nonsevere, 8.1% transiently severe, and 5.6% continuously severe asthma. Excess prevalence of pneumonia was observed in continuously (22%) and transiently severe (14%) compared with nonsevere patients after adjusting for age and sex. Cataract, osteoporosis, obesity, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation were also more frequent in severe asthma patients. The ICS and/or OCS use contributed to the risk of several comorbidities in a dose-dependent manner, particularly pneumonia, osteoporosis, obesity, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation. High OCS use and the presence of comorbidities were associated with increased health care resource use. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe asthma have a high burden of comorbidities, especially pneumonia. Many of the comorbidities have a strong dose-dependent association with ICS and OCS treatment, suggesting that corticosteroid doses should be carefully evaluated in clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Antiasmáticos , Asma , Fibrilación Atrial , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Osteoporosis , Neumonía , Adulto , Humanos , Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Transversales , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Asma/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Obesidad/epidemiología , Osteoporosis/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Neumonía/epidemiología , Administración por Inhalación
15.
Chest ; 2024 Jun 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38885897

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The healthy adherer effect has gained increasing attention as potential source of bias in observational studies examining the association of positive airway pressure (PAP) adherence with health outcomes in OSA. RESEARCH QUESTION: Is adherence to PAP associated with healthy behaviors and health care resource use prior to device prescription? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Data from the IRSR Pays de la Loire Sleep Cohort were linked to health administrative data to identify proxies of heathy behaviors, including adherence to cardiovascular (CV) drugs (medical possession ratio), cancer screening tests, influenza vaccination, alcohol and smoking consumption, and drowsiness-related road accidents during the 2 years preceding PAP onset in patients with OSA. Multivariable regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the association of heathy behaviors with subsequent PAP adherence. Health care resource use was evaluated according to subsequent PAP adherence. RESULTS: We included 2,836 patients who had started PAP therapy between 2012 and 2018 (65% of whom were PAP adherent with mean daily use ≥ 4 h/night). Being adherent to CV active drugs (medical possession ratio ≥ 80%) and a person who does not smoke were associated with a higher likelihood of PAP adherence (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.15-1.77 and OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.10-1.71, respectively). Patients with no history of drowsiness-related road accidents were more likely to continue PAP (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.04-1.87). Patients who were PAP adherent used less health care resources 2 years before PAP initiation than patients who were nonadherent (mean number of outpatient consultations: 19.0 vs 17.2, P = .003; hospitalization days: 5.7 vs 5.0; P = .04; ED visits: 30.7% vs 24.0%, P = .0002, respectively). INTERPRETATION: Patients who adhere to PAP therapy for OSA were more health-seeking and used less health care resources prior to device initiation than patients who were nonadherent. Until the healthy adherer effect associated with PAP adherence is better understood, caution is warranted when interpreting the association of PAP adherence with CV health outcomes and health care resource use in nonrandomized cohorts.

16.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 13(9): e030679, 2024 May 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38700039

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) contributes to the generation, recurrence, and perpetuation of atrial fibrillation, and it is associated with worse outcomes. Little is known about the economic impact of OSA therapy in atrial fibrillation. This retrospective cohort study assessed the impact of positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy adherence on health care resource use and costs in patients with OSA and atrial fibrillation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Insurance claims data for ≥1 year before sleep testing and 2 years after device setup were linked with objective PAP therapy use data. PAP adherence was defined from an extension of the US Medicare 90-day definition. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to create covariate-balanced PAP adherence groups to mitigate confounding. Of 5867 patients (32% women; mean age, 62.7 years), 41% were adherent, 38% were intermediate, and 21% were nonadherent. Mean±SD number of all-cause emergency department visits (0.61±1.21 versus 0.77±1.55 [P=0.023] versus 0.95±1.90 [P<0.001]), all-cause hospitalizations (0.19±0.69 versus 0.24±0.72 [P=0.002] versus 0.34±1.16 [P<0.001]), and cardiac-related hospitalizations (0.06±0.26 versus 0.09±0.41 [P=0.023] versus 0.10±0.44 [P=0.004]) were significantly lower in adherent versus intermediate and nonadherent patients, as were all-cause inpatient costs ($2200±$8054 versus $3274±$12 065 [P=0.002] versus $4483±$16 499 [P<0.001]). All-cause emergency department costs were significantly lower in adherent and intermediate versus nonadherent patients ($499±$1229 and $563±$1292 versus $691±$1652 [P<0.001 and P=0.002], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest clinical and economic benefits of PAP therapy in patients with concomitant OSA and atrial fibrillation. This supports the value of diagnosing and managing OSA and highlights the need for strategies to enhance PAP adherence in this population.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Presión de las Vías Aéreas Positiva Contínua , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Humanos , Femenino , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Fibrilación Atrial/economía , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/terapia , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/economía , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/epidemiología , Presión de las Vías Aéreas Positiva Contínua/economía , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Recursos en Salud/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
Hand (N Y) ; : 15589447241233710, 2024 Feb 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38420784

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We investigated whether any interspecialty variation exists, regarding perioperative health care resource usage, in carpal tunnel releases (CTRs). METHODS: The 2010 to 2021 PearlDiver Mariner Database, an all-payer claims database, was queried to identify patients undergoing primary CTRs. Physician specialty IDs were used to identify the specialty of the surgeon-orthopedic versus plastic versus general surgery versus neurosurgery. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify whether there was any interspecialty variation between the use of health care resources. RESULTS: A total of 908 671 patients undergoing CTRs were included, of which 556 339 (61.2%) were by orthopedic surgeons, 297 047 (32.7%) by plastic surgeons, 44 118 (4.9%) by neurosurgeons, and 11 257 (1.2%) by general surgeons. In comparison with orthopedic surgeons, patients treated by plastic surgeons were less likely to have received opioids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, oral steroids, and preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis but were more likely to have received steroid injections and electrodiagnostic studies (EDSs) preoperatively. Patients treated by neurosurgeons were more likely to have received preoperative opioids, gabapentin, oral steroids, preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis, EDSs, and formal preoperative physical/occupational therapy and less likely to have received steroid injections. Patients treated by general surgeons were less likely to receive oral steroids, steroid injections, EDSs, preoperative formal physical therapy, and preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis, but were more likely to be prescribed gabapentin. CONCLUSIONS: There exists significant variation in perioperative health care resource usage for CTRs between specialties. Understanding reasons behind such variation would be paramount in minimizing differences in how care is practiced for elective hand procedures.

18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39032830

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Type 2 low-severe asthma phenotype is often a result of corticosteroid-overtreated type 2 disease owing to persistent symptoms, often unrelated to asthma and unlikely to respond to high-dose corticosteroid treatment. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to characterize patients with severe asthma with low eosinophil counts (<300 cells/µL) and describe their disease burden and treatment across health care settings in the United Kingdom. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients with severe asthma using linked Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum-Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) and UK Severe Asthma Registry (UKSAR) data indexed patients according to the latest blood eosinophil count (BEC). Clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, outcomes, and health care resource use were described by baseline BEC (≤150 and >150 to <300 cells/µL). RESULTS: Analysis included 701 (CPRD-HES) and 1,546 (UKSAR) patients; 60.5% and 59.4% had BECs 150 cells/µL or less at baseline, respectively. Across BEC groups, the proportion with uncontrolled asthma (two or more exacerbations) at follow-up (12 months after the index) was 5.4% in CPRD-HES and 45.2% in UKSAR. Maintenance oral corticosteroid use remained high across BEC groups (CPRD-HES: 29.4%; UKSAR: 51.7%), symptom control remained poor (>200 µg short-acting ß2 agonist or >500 µg terbutaline/d in CPRD-HES: 48.8%; median Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 score in UKSAR: 2.0 [range, 1.0-3.3]). Health care resource use was similar across BEC groups. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients managed in primary care experienced infrequent exacerbations, whereas UKSAR patients had frequent exacerbations. Large proportions of both patient groups had poor symptom control and continued to receive high levels of maintenance oral corticosteroids, increasing the risk of corticosteroid-induced morbidity. These data highlight the need for rigorous assessment of underlying disease pathology to guide appropriate treatment.

19.
J Med Econ ; 27(1): 1027-1035, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39087236

RESUMEN

AIMS: Food allergies impose a large clinical and financial burden on patients and the health care system. However, little is known about the factors associated with health care resource use and costs. The aim of this study was to investigate health care resource use and costs in individuals with food allergies utilizing health care in the United States. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of insurance claims data from the Merative MarketScan Research Databases (indexed from 1 January 2015 to 30 June 2022). All-cause and food allergy-related health care resource use, direct medical, and out-of-pocket costs for medical services were estimated for 12 months post-index using International Classification of Diseases [ICD] codes. RESULTS: Of 355,520 individuals with food allergies continuously enrolled in a health insurance plan for ≥12 months pre- and post-index, 17% had a food allergy-related emergency department visit and 0.9% were hospitalized. The top patient characteristic associated with all-cause and food allergy-related hospitalizations, all-cause costs, and food allergy-related outpatient visit costs was a Charlson Comorbidity Index score of ≥2. Food allergy-related direct medical and out-of-pocket costs were high among patients with a food allergy-related visit. Out-of-pocket cost per patient per year for outpatient visits, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations had an estimated mean of $1631 for patients with food allergy-related visits, which is ∼11% of the total costs for these services ($14,395 per patient per year). LIMITATIONS: Study limitations are primarily related to the nature of claims databases, including generalizability and reliance on ICD codes. Nevertheless, MarketScan databases provide robust patient-level insights into health care resource use and costs from a large, commercially insured patient population. CONCLUSION: The health care resource use of patients with food allergies imposes a burden on both the health care system and on patients and their families, especially if patients had comorbidities.


Some people with food allergies might need extra visits to the doctor or hospital to manage allergic reactions to food, and these visits add to the cost of medical services for both families and for health care providers. Using records of health insurance claims, we looked into the factors affecting medical visits and costs in people with food allergies in the United States. For people with food allergies, having additional medical conditions (measured using the Charleson Comorbidity Index) were linked with extra medical visits and costs. Out-of-pocket costs were high for people who visited a doctor or hospital for their food allergies (costing each person more than $1,600 per year). The total medical cost of food allergy-related care was $14,395 per person per year, paid for by families and health care providers. Our findings might help to better manage and treat people with food allergies and reduce medical costs.


Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos , Gastos en Salud , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/economía , Masculino , Femenino , Estados Unidos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Niño , Preescolar , Lactante , Comorbilidad , Anciano , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Recursos en Salud/economía , Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Recién Nacido
20.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob ; 3(1): 100197, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38226187

RESUMEN

Background: Allergy immunotherapy (AIT) can be administered as subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) injections in the clinic or as sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) tablets at home after initiation under medical supervision. To achieve long-term, sustained effects, a 3-year treatment duration is recommended. Objective: Our aim was to assess the association of AIT (SCIT and SLIT tablets) with long-term health care resource use (HRU) and costs in subjects with allergic rhinitis. Methods: REACT was a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study using claims data from a German health insurance database (2007-2017), with up to 9 years of follow-up after AIT initiation. HRU and costs were evaluated for hospitalizations, ambulatory care visits, and prescriptions, in subjects who received AIT versus in matched controls with allergic rhinitis who had not received AIT, as well as for SCIT and SLIT tablets. Results: Across all 9 years, the subjects who received AIT had a significantly lower incidence of hospitalization than the controls did. Generally, proportions of subjects with ambulatory care visits and hospitalizations were lower, and length of hospitalization was shorter, for those receiving SLIT tablets than those who received SCIT. Total costs were significantly higher with AIT versus for the controls during the treatment period (years 1 to 3), driven by prescriptions and ambulatory care visits, but they were lower in years 4 to 9. During years 1 to 3, prescription costs were generally higher for SLIT tablets than for SCIT, whereas ambulatory care costs were numerically lower. In most years, hospitalization costs were numerically lower for SLIT tablets than for SCIT. Conclusion: Initial higher HRU and costs of AIT during the expected treatment period are offset in the long term. At-home administration of SLIT tablets may further reduce ambulatory care costs.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA