Hepatitis B reactivation in PsA patients: an SLR and meta-analysis for IL-17, IL-23 and JAK inhibitors.

OBJECTIVES: Hepatitis B reactivation (HBVr) constitutes a side effect of the treatment of autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Even though HBVr risk of conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents has long been established, the risk of targeted synthetic (ts)DMARDs and anti-interleukin (anti-IL) agents remains largely unknown. METHODS: We conducted a SLR (PubMed, Scopus and EMBASE) and metanalysis to examine the HBVr risk for the following: anti-IL17, anti-IL12/23, anti-IL23 and JAK-inhibitors in patients with chronic HBV infection (HBsAg presence or detectable HBV-DNA) and in patients with prior HBV infection (HBcAb-positive and HBsAg-negative). Meta-analysis was performed using both the fixed and random effects method and was conducted using the R computing language. RESULTS: Overall, our study revealed a low HBVr risk of < 6% in all agents; the risk was significantly higher for people having chronic compared with those with resolved HBV (14,4% vs 5.1%, respectively p< 0.01). There was no difference among different drugs in the HBVr rates [anti-IL-17: 4% (95% CI: 1-9%), anti-IL-12/IL-23: 2% (95% CI: 0-5%), JAK-inhibitors: 4% (95% CI: 1-8%), anti-IL23: 0%]. Of note, HBVr rate reached 28% in patients with chronic HBV who did not receive anti-viral treatment. For patients with resolved hepatitis the respective percentage was 4.7%. CONCLUSION: Overall, our meta-analysis shows that patients with chronic HBV receiving anti-IL-17, anti-IL-12/23, anti-IL-23 and JAK-inhibitors have significant risk for HBVr, especially if they are not under anti-viral treatment. In contrast, resolved HBV seems to offer minor risk for HBVr even without anti-viral treatment.

Prevention of Hepatitis B Reactivation in Patients Receiving Immunosuppressive Therapy: a Case Series and Appraisal of Society Guidelines.

Hepatitis B (HBV) reactivation (HBVr) is a potentially fatal complication in patients with past HBV exposure receiving immunosuppressive therapy. HBVr can occur in patients with chronic HBV infection as well as in patients with resolved HBV infection. In this article, we present the cases of four patients with resolved hepatitis B who presented with HBVr during or after immunosuppressive treatment, of whom two died as a consequence of HBVr. We then reflect on and summarize the recommendations of four major societies for the screening and management of previously HBV-exposed patients planned to receive immunosuppressive treatment. Current guidelines recommend screening for HBV in all patients planned to receive immunosuppressive therapy. Risk of HBVr is assessed based on the serological status of the patient and the planned immunosuppressive drug regimen. For patients considered to be at low risk of HBVr, management consists of serological monitoring for HBVr and immediate preemptive antiviral therapy in the case of HBVr. For patients considered to be at intermediate or high risk for HBVr, antiviral prophylaxis should be initiated concordantly with the immunosuppressive therapy and continued for up to 18 months after cessation of the immunosuppressive regimen. Areas of uncertainty include the risk of novel and emerging immunosuppressive and immune modulatory drugs and the exact duration of antiviral prophylaxis. Greater awareness is needed among clinicians regarding the risk of HBVr in patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy, especially in low-endemicity settings. Implementation of screening and management programs and decision support tools based on the presented guidelines may improve the management of these patients.

Low Rate of Hepatitis B Reactivation Among Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C During Direct Acting Antiviral Therapy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation has been reported in patients co-infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) during direct acting antiviral (DAA) therapy, leading the United States Food and Drug Administration (U.S. FDA) to issue a black box warning on all DAA drug labels recommending monitoring for HBV reactivation. We conducted a comprehensive evaluation to assess the rate of HBV reactivation among patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) during DAA therapy. METHODS: Patients with CHC and recovered HBV infection (hepatitis B surface antigen negative (HBsAg)/anti-hepatitis B core positive), treated with DAAs were included if stored sera were available. Samples were tested for HBV DNA, HBsAg, and ALT. HBV reactivation was considered if (1) HBV DNA was undetectable pre-DAA therapy and became detectable post-therapy, or (2) HBV DNA was detectable pre-treatment, but not quantifiable (< 20 IU/mL) and became quantifiable post-treatment. RESULT: 79 patients with median age of 62 years were included. 68% were male and Caucasian. Various DAA regimens were administered for 12-24 weeks. Reactivation occurred in 8/79 (10%) of patients and occurred more frequently in men compared to women: 6 during treatment and 2 after treatment. Neither an ALT flare nor HBsAg seroreversion were observed. Detectable HBV DNA was transient in 5/8 and could not be determined in 3/8 but ALT flares were not observed in follow-up of these patients. CONCLUSION: The risk of HBV reactivation was low in CHC patients with resolved HBV during DAA therapy. Our data support testing for HBV DNA only in selected patients with ALT flares or failure of ALT normalization during DAA treatment.

Size Matters! Anti-HBs Titer and HBV Reactivation During Anti-TNF Therapy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We and others have previously described that hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) seems to protect against clinically significant HBV reactivation in cohort studies of patients undergoing anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy. However, there were too few cases of HBV reactivation within cohort studies to assess the role of anti-HBs titer on reactivation. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the correlation between anti-HBs titer and the degree of clinically relevant HBV reactivation in patients undergoing anti-TNF therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: We systemically reviewed all studies discussing anti-TNF therapy in patients with resolved HBV infection, defined as hepatitis surface antigen (HBsAg) negative and hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) positive. We identified a total of 48 cases of reactivation from 5 cohort studies and 10 case reports or case series; 21 were anti-HBs negative, 7 were only reported as anti-HBs positive, 16 were anti-HBs positive with titer below 100, and 4 were anti-HBs positive with titer above 100. HBsAg sero-reversion was dominantly seen in patients with negative, low and/or declining anti-HBs titers. There was a significant trend toward less clinically relevant form of reactivation with increase in baseline anti-HBs titer (p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: Anti-HBs titers greater than 100 iU/L protect against clinically relevant HBV reactivation, while patients with low anti-HBs titers or negative anti-HBs had more clinically relevant HBV reactivation and higher rates of HBsAg sero-reversion. This suggests the importance of baseline quantitative anti-HBs prior to starting anti-TNF therapy and consideration vaccination for boosting anti-HBs titers prior to and/or during therapy.

Fatal hepatitis B reactivation in a patient receiving chemoradiation for cervical cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a global public health threat, with approximately 257 million people suffering from chronic HBV infection worldwide in 2015. HBV reactivation is a known complication of immunosuppressive therapy in people suffering with chronic HBV. Medications commonly associated with HBV reactivation include B-cell depleting agents and anthracycline derivatives. There have been very few documented cases of chemoradiation inducing HBV reactivation among scientific literature. CASE REPORT: A 44-year-old woman with chronic HBV infection and [FIGO] stage IIIB cervical cancer developed marked transaminitis and increased HBV viral load after receiving treatment with three doses of cisplatin and one dose of carboplatin with concurrent radiation for cervical cancer.Management and outcome: The patient was admitted for acute liver failure and quickly developed encephalopathy, with treatment complicated by coagulopathy, hypoglycemia, and metabolic acidosis. The patient remained unresponsive to maximal therapeutic efforts and was mechanically ventilated for airway protection. She subsequently died after experiencing ventricular tachycardia followed by asystole. DISCUSSION: There are currently no standardized guidelines for the screening of HBV infection or prophylaxis treatment algorithm for patients undergoing chemoradiation. When initiating treatment with immunosuppressive therapy, it is important to screen all patients for chronic HBV infection and to work with an interdisciplinary team of oncologists, hepatologists, and pharmacists to initiate prophylactic antiviral therapy and closely monitor to minimize the risk of HBV reactivation.

Evaluation of Hepatitis B Reactivation Among Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treated With Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.

Hepatitis B reactivation (HBVr) in cancer patients is a well-established complication due to chemotherapy-induced immunosuppression. Studies have reported HBVr associated with immunosuppressive medications, such as rituximab, methotrexate, and high dose steroids. There are different risks for different types of chemotherapy with rituximab carrying one of the highest risks for hepatitis B reactivation. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the standard of care in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). The risk of HBVr in chronic myeloid leukemia has been reported in many studies, but to this date, there are no clear guidelines or recommendations regarding screening and monitoring of HBV in CML patients receiving TKIs. We conducted this review to identify the risk of HBVr in patients with CML who are treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. We recommend testing for HBV status in patients who are to be treated with TKIs and to consider giving prophylaxis in those who are positive for HBsAg at baseline. More studies are needed to assess the risk of reactivation in patients with Hepatitis B core antibody positive receiving TKIs. Currently, monitoring such patients for reactivation may be the best strategy.

Longitudinal changes of liver function and hepatitis B reactivation in COVID-19 patients with pre-existing chronic hepatitis B virus infection.

AIM: With the current coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic and high endemic levels of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection worldwide, it is urgent to investigate liver function changes of COVID-19 patients with chronic HBV infection, and how severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in turn affects the course of chronic HBV infection. METHOD: We undertook a retrospective study based on 347 COVID-19 patients (21 vs. 326 with vs. without chronic HBV infection). With the propensity score matching (PSM) method, we yielded 20 and 51 matched patients for the HBV group and the non-HBV group, respectively. RESULTS: At the end of follow-up, all of these 71 patients achieved SARS-CoV-2 clearance (P = 0.1). During the follow-up, 30% versus 31.4% in the HBV group versus non-HBV group progressed to severe COVID-19 (P = 0.97). After PSM, the longitudinal changes of median values for liver biochemistries were not significantly different between the two groups. In the HBV group versus non-HBV group, 35% (7/20) versus 37.25% (19/51) (P = 0.86) had abnormal alanine aminotransferase at least once during hospitalization, 30% (6/20) versus 31.37% (16/51) had abnormal aspartate aminotransferase (P = 0.91), 40% (8/20) versus 37.25% (19/51) had abnormal γ-glutamyltransferase (P = 0.83), and 45% (9/20) versus 39.22% (20/51) had abnormal total bilirubin levels (P = 0.91). Moreover, three patients in the HBV group had hepatitis B reactivation. CONCLUSIONS: Liver dysfunction presented in COVID-19 patients with/without chronic HBV. Moreover, those COVID-19 patients co-infected with chronic HBV could have a risk of hepatitis B reactivation. It is necessary to monitor liver function of COVID-19 patients, as well as HBV-DNA levels for those co-infected with HBV during the whole disease course.

High hepatitis B virus screening rate among patients receiving systemic anticancer treatment in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection have a risk of reactivation after chemotherapy. All patients undergoing chemotherapy should be screened for HBV infection. No large-scale studies have been conducted to examine HBV screening practice in Japan. METHODS: We analyzed health insurance claims equivalent data linked with a nationwide hospital-based cancer registry. Patients diagnosed with cancer in 2014, who were aged 20 years and older and those who underwent systemic anticancer treatment in 2014-15 were included. We assessed the HBV screening rates by the HBsAg or anti-HBc tests, HBV-DNA tests, and entecavir prescriptions. Multiple logistic regression models were used to identify factors related to the receipt of screening. RESULTS: Of 177,597 patients (mean [SD] age, 65.6 [12.2] years), 82.6% and 12.9% patients had a solid tumor and hematologic malignancy, respectively. Among them, 88.1%, 6.3%, and 5.5% received cytotoxic chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and anti-CD20 antibodies, respectively. Overall, 70.6% of patients were screened. The positive predictor of HBV screening was receiving anti-CD20 antibodies [odds ratio (OR); 2.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.06-2.41, p < 0.001] and negative predictors were age ≥ 85 (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.71-0.81), age 75-84 (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.75-0.79) and targeted therapy (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.67-0.72). Among the screened patients, 13.2% were tested for HBV-DNA, and 1.49% were prescribed entecavir. CONCLUSIONS: The HBV screening rate in Japan is higher than in other countries. Further improvement of the HBV screening rate is needed to prevent reactivation and avoidable deaths of patients with HBV infection.

Cost-effectiveness of preventing hepatitis B virus reactivation in patients with lymphoma and resolved HBV infection.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation may occur in >10% of patients with lymphoma and resolved HBV infection who undergo rituximab-containing chemotherapy. Preventive strategies may have marked impact on resource allocation in HBV endemic areas. This study aims to compare the cost-effectiveness between prophylactic antiviral therapy and HBV DNA monitoring for the prevention of HBV-related complications. METHODS: Data sources are studies of HBV-related events and survival for patients with lymphoma and resolved HBV infection published since 2006. Decision tree analysis was used to compare the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of preventing HBV-related death or liver decompensation for patients who undergo first-line rituximab-containing chemotherapy. Sensitivity analysis was performed to examine the impact of the preventive efficacy, the duration of prophylactic antiviral therapy, and the cost of different interventions. The direct medical cost was derived from the database of the NHI Administration, Taiwan. The time frame of our analysis was set to 3 years after the completion of chemotherapy. RESULTS: The median ICER of prophylactic antiviral therapy, according to current practice guidelines, ranged between USD 150,000 and 250,000 if we apply the guidelines generally. When a long-course (12 months after completion of chemotherapy according to clinical guidelines) prophylactic therapy was assumed, Option A was cheaper and more effective only in the anti-HBs-negative subgroup (median ICER US$149,932 vs. US$161,526, p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Identification of anti-HBs-negative subgroups is critical to improve the cost-effectiveness of prophylactic antiviral therapy in lymphoma patients with resolved HBV infection.

Hepatitis B reactivation among 1962 patients with hematological malignancy in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: The risk of Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in patients with different hematological malignancy except lymphoma were rarely known before. METHODS: A total of 1962 patients with hematological malignancy were enrolled and followed-up at the National Taiwan University Hospital between 2008 and 2013. The clinical characteristics, HBV serology, and laboratory data were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 1962 patients comprising 1048 men and 914 women were studied. The median age of the patients was 55 years (range, 15-97 years). Chronic HBV carriage was documented at diagnosis of hematological malignancy in 286 (14.6%) patients. A total of 171 (59.8%) of the 286 HBV carriers received primary prophylaxis with anti-HBV agents. Of the HBV carriers, 97 (33.9%) developed hepatitis B reactivation during or after chemotherapy, including 59 patients who had discontinued antiviral therapy. The incidence of hepatitis B reactivation among patients with hematological malignancy and HBV carriage was 10.4 per 100 person-years. A multivariate analysis revealed hepatocellular carcinoma (p < 0.001) and antiviral prophylaxis use (p < 0.001) were independent risk factors of HBV reactivation in HBV carriers. Of the 1676 patients with initial negative hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) counts, 41 (2.4%) experienced hepatitis B reactivation, reverse seroconversion of HBsAg, and lost their protective hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs). A multivariate analysis revealed that diabetes mellitus (p = 0.005, odds ratio (OR): 0.218, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.076-0.629), allogeneic transplantation (p = 0.013, OR: 0.182, 95% CI: 0.047-0.701), liver cirrhosis (p < 0.001, OR: 0.002, 95% CI: 0-0.047), low anti-HBs titers (p = 0.016, OR: 0.020, 95% CI: 0.001-0.480), and positive hepatitis B core antibody (p = 0.013, OR: 0.070, 95% CI: 0.009-0.571) were independent risk factors of positive seroconversion of HBsAg in patients with hematological malignancy. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of HBV reactivation among the patients with varying subtypes of hematological malignancy is similar. Prophylaxis with anti-HBV agents critically reduced the risk of hepatitis B reactivation.

Examining Hepatitis, A and B Vaccination, and HBV Reactivation Monitoring During Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy for Hepatitis C.

The objective of this study was to examine Hepatitis A (HAV) and Hepatitis B (HBV) screening, and the risk of HBV reactivation during Hepatitis C (HCV) therapy with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). A retrospective chart review was performed of patients treated with second generation DAA therapy from January 2014 to September 2016 at the Iowa City VA Healthcare System. In total 409 patients initiated HCV treatment, 308 (75%) and 241 (59%) were HAV and HBV vaccine eligible, respectively. Among those, 24 (8%) received a HAV vaccine, while only 20 (8%) received a HBV vaccine. Of these, 7 patients initiating an immunization in the clinic had record of completing the series. Further, 101 patients had a reactive Hepatitis B core Antibody indicating previous HBV infection, and 3 of these were tested for HBV reactivation during HCV therapy. Overall, the assessment found low rates of HAV and HBV vaccine administration, indicating missed opportunities for preventative care during HCV therapy. With the known risk of HBV reactivation with DAAs, the need for HAV and HBV screening is essential.

Impact of the timing of hepatitis B virus identification and anti-hepatitis B virus therapy initiation on the risk of adverse liver outcomes for patients receiving cancer therapy.

BACKGROUND: Data on the incidence of adverse liver outcomes are limited for cancer patients with chronic (hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg]-positive/hepatitis B core antibody [anti-HBc]-positive) or past (HBsAg-negative/anti-HBc-positive) hepatitis B virus (HBV) after chemotherapy. This study was aimed at determining the impact of test timing and anti-HBV therapy on adverse liver outcomes in these patients. METHODS: Patients with solid or hematologic malignancies who received chemotherapy between 2004 and 2011 were retrospectively studied. HBV testing and anti-HBV therapy were defined as early at the initiation of cancer therapy and as late after initiation. Outcomes included hepatitis flares, hepatic impairment, liver failure, and death. Time-to-event analysis was used to determine incidence, and multivariate hazard models were used to determine predictors of outcomes. RESULTS: There were 18,688 study patients (80.4% with solid tumors). The prevalence of chronic HBV was 1.1% (52 of 4905), and the prevalence of past HBV was 7.1% (350 of 4905). Among patients with solid tumors, late identification of chronic HBV was associated with a higher risk of hepatitis flare (hazard ratio [HR], 4.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-12.86), hepatic impairment (HR, 8.48; 95% CI, 1.86-38.66), liver failure (HR, 9.38; 95% CI, 1.50-58.86), and death (HR, 3.90; 95% CI, 1.19-12.83) in comparison with early identification. Among patients with hematologic malignancies and chronic HBV, the risk of death was 7.8 (95% CI, 1.73-35.27) times higher for persons with late initiation of anti-HBV therapy versus early initiation. Patients with late identification of chronic HBV had late or no anti-HBV therapy. Chronic HBV predicted liver failure in patients with solid or hematologic malignancies, whereas male sex and late identification were predictors for patients with solid tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Early identification correlates with early anti-HBV therapy and reduces the risk of liver failure and death in chronic HBV patients receiving chemotherapy. Cancer 2017;123:3367-76. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Treatment of chronic hepatitis B infection-2017.

Since the registration of the first effective nucleoside analogue against the hepatitis B virus almost two decades ago, major progress has been made in the management of chronic hepatitis B infection. However, hepatitis B-related morbidity and mortality remain a major global health threat. This is partly due to the escalating costs and the decrease in compliance related to the need for prolonged therapy for most patients who cannot be "cured". New biomarkers such as quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen might help to determine if hepatitis B e antigen negative patients can be taken off nucleos(t)ide analogues. On the other hand, novel compounds that target the viral life cycle or modulate host immune response are in the pipeline. In the next few years, one should expect breakthrough advancement to be made leading to a "cure" for patients with chronic hepatitis B infection by inducing hepatitis surface antigen loss with or without the development of the hepatitis B surface antibody. In addition, attention and necessary actions should also be taken in patients with hepatitis B infection who are being treated with immunosuppressive therapy and direct anti-viral (DAAs) agents for hepatitis C infection to prevent hepatitis from hepatitis B reactivation.

Hepatitis B Reactivation: The Controversies Continue.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is a serious but largely avoidable complication of immunosuppressive therapy. The consequences of reactivation range from subclinical increases in HBV DNA to fulminant liver failure, which can be prevented with the appropriate use of prophylactic antiviral therapy. However, which patients need to be screened and whether all patients who test positive for any serological test require antiviral therapy are issues that still remain unclear. Additional issues such as the choice of antiviral and the duration of treatment also need clarification. Some of the confusion comes from the use of varying definitions in the literature to define outcomes. In this review, areas of controversy from definitions of reactivation to management of patients who are hepatitis B surface antigen and lone anti-core antibody positive in different clinical settings are discussed. The recently recognized issue of reactivation in the setting of hepatitis C antiviral therapy is also addressed as well as some recommendations for areas of future research to help clarify best practices.

Spontaneous remission of hepatitis B virus reactivation during direct-acting antiviral agent-based therapy for chronic hepatitis C.

The administration of direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) to treat hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has been reported to cause hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation. However, the actual conditions of HBV reactivation and the ideal timing of medical intervention have not been fully evaluated. We report the cases of two female patients dually infected with HBV and HCV. Both patients were inactive HBV carriers. Although the serum HCV RNA levels promptly decreased after the initiation of DAA-based therapy, the serum HBV DNA levels gradually increased during DAA-based therapy, with the peak serum HBV DNA levels observed at 16 weeks after the initiation of DAA-based therapy in both cases. Subsequently, we checked the serum HBV DNA levels closely every week several times. Fortunately, the serum HBV DNA levels gradually decreased without medical intervention. Neither case developed an alanine aminotransferase flare-up. The HCV genotypes were 2a and 1b, and the DAA-based therapies of Cases 1 and 2 were 12 weeks of sofosbuvir/ribavirin and ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir, respectively. The significance of our case reports is the demonstration of the existence of spontaneous remission of HBV reactivation that developed during DAA-based therapy, the avoidance of intervention of nucleot(s)ide analogs by frequent monitoring of serum HBV DNA levels, and development of HBV reactivation regardless of the viral genotype or class of DAA. In conclusion, the close monitoring of serum HBV DNA levels during and after DAA-based therapy is essential and medical intervention for HBV reactivation should be carefully considered on an individual basis.

Hepatitis B virus reactivation in patients with solid tumors receiving systemic anticancer treatment.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is a well-known risk during chemotherapy for hematological malignancies with reported rates ranging between 14% and 72%. However, there is a paucity of data regarding HBV infection management and reactivation risk in patients receiving systemic treatments for solid tumors. DESIGN: We conducted a PubMed search for publications from January 1990 until May 2016 related to HBV reactivation. The search terms were 'hepatitis B reactivation', cross-referenced with 'chemotherapy', then 'hepatitis B' cross-referenced with International Non-proprietary Name of each of the most used chemotherapy drugs in solid tumors. RESULTS: From these data, a grading of HBV reactivation risk and recommendations for management are given for most frequently used anticancer drugs in solid tumors. CONCLUSION: Most drugs used for the treatment of solid tumors can induce hepatitis B reactivation in HBs antigen-positive patients. HBV screening can be recommended before systemic treatment initiation. Pre-emptive antiviral treatment can reduce the risk of HBV reactivation and prevent chemotherapy disruption.

Hepatitis B reactivation in HBsAg-negative/HBcAb-positive patients receiving rituximab for lymphoma: a meta-analysis.

Patients with chronic hepatitis B (HBsAg-positive) are at risk of viral reactivation if rituximab is administered without antiviral treatment, a potentially fatal complication of treatment. Patients with so-called 'resolved hepatitis B virus infection' (HBsAg-negative/cAb-positive) may also be at risk. We performed a systematic review of the English and Chinese language literature to estimate the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in HBsAg-negative/cAb-positive patients receiving rituximab for lymphoma. A pooled risk estimate was calculated for HBV reactivation. The impact of HBsAb status and study design on reactivation rates was explored. Data from 578 patients in 15 studies were included. 'Clinical HBV reactivation', (ALT >3 × normal and either an increase in HBV DNA from baseline or HBsAg seroreversion), was estimated at 6.3% (I(2) = 63%, P = 0.006). Significant heterogeneity was detected. Reactivation rates were higher in prospective vs retrospective studies (14.2% vs 3.8%; OR = 4.39, 95% CI 0.83-23.28). Exploratory analyses found no effect of HBsAb status on reactivation risk (OR = 0.083; P = 0.151). Our meta-analysis confirms a measurable and potentially substantial risk of HBV reactivation in HBsAg-negative/cAb-positive patients exposed to rituximab. However, heterogeneity in the existing literature limits the generalizability of our findings. Large, prospective studies, with uniform definitions of HBV reactivation, are needed to clarify the risk of HBV reactivation in HBsAg-negative/cAb-positive patients.

Hepatitis B reactivation in multiple myeloma patients with resolved hepatitis B undergoing chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Despite increasing reports of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in multiple myeloma (MM), HBV reactivation in patients with resolved hepatitis B [hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative/anti-hepatitis B core antigen antibody (anti-HBc)-positive] is still poorly characterized. The aim of this study was to clarify its frequency and risk factors. METHODS: A total of 230 MM patients with resolved hepatitis B were retrospectively reviewed for HBV reactivation and biochemical flare. RESULTS: During a median 2.4 years of follow-up, HBV reactivation was diagnosed in 12 patients (5.2%). The cumulative rates of HBV reactivation at 2 years and 5 years were 5% and 8% respectively. A baseline anti-HBs-negative status (P = 0.033) and high-dose therapy/autologous stem-cell transplantation [HDT/ASCT (P = 0.025)] were significant risk factors that were positively associated with HBV reactivation. In subgroup analysis of patients treated with HDT/ASCT (n = 127), a baseline anti-HBs-negative status was the only significant risk factor for HBV reactivation (hazard ratio, 4.64; 95% CI, 1.47-14.7; P = 0.009). DISCUSSION: These data show that evaluation of anti-HBc is needed for MM patients, and suggest that monitoring of HBV DNA should be considered for patients with resolved hepatitis B undergoing HDT/ASCT, especially those who are anti-HBs-negative.

Long-term outcome in Caucasian patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection after HBsAg seroclearance.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The natural course after hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance in Caucasian patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is not well-defined. To investigate the clinical characteristics and outcome in a series of European Caucasian patients with chronic HBV infection according to HBsAg response over time. METHODS: A total of 612 patients with compensated chronic HBV infection and without other cause of liver disease were prospectively followed up. Seventy-eight subjects cleared HBsAg and 534 remained HBsAg-positive. Clinical and virological examinations were periodically performed and development of cirrhosis and liver-related complications was monitored during a mean follow-up time of 9.9 years. RESULTS: After HBsAg seroclearance, serum HBV DNA was undetectable in 38 patients in whom it was tested and HBsAg reappearance was observed in two subjects (2.6%). At 15 years of follow-up, the cumulative probability of developing a liver-related complication was 11.6% in HBsAg-positive patients and 1.8% in those with HBsAg loss (P = 0.03), although this benefit was limited to patients with cirrhosis (P < 0.001) and to those who received therapy (P < 0.01). Among patients without cirrhosis and among those who did not receive therapy, the probability was not different between those who cleared the HBsAg and those who did not (P = 0.3 and P = 0.5 respectively). CONCLUSION: Hepatitis B surface antigen loss confers a significant clinical benefit in Caucasian subjects with HBV-related cirrhosis and in those with chronic HBV infection who receive antiviral therapy. However, HBsAg reappearance can be observed in selected cases.