Do Antibiotic-Impregnated Envelopes Prevent Deep Brain Stimulation Implantable Pulse Generator Infections? A Prospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Infection after deep brain stimulation (DBS) implanted pulse generator (IPG) replacement is uncommon but when it occurs can cause significant clinical morbidity, often resulting in partial or complete DBS system removal. An antibiotic absorbable envelope developed for cardiac implantable electronic devices (IEDs), which releases minocycline and rifampicin for a minimum of 7 days, was shown in the WRAP-IT study to reduce cardiac IED infections for high-risk cardiac patients. We aimed to assess whether placing an IPG in the same antibiotic envelope at the time of IPG replacement reduced the IPG infection rate. METHODS: Following institutional ethics approval (UnitingCare HREC), patients scheduled for IPG change due to impending battery depletion were prospectively randomised to receive IPG replacement with or without an antibiotic envelope. Patients with a past history of DBS system infection were excluded. Patients underwent surgery with standard aseptic neurosurgical technique [J Neurol Sci. 2017;383:135-41]. Subsequent infection requiring antibiotic therapy and/or IPG removal or revision was recorded. RESULTS: A total of 427 consecutive patients were randomised from 2018 to 2021 and followed for a minimum of 12 months. No patients were lost to follow-up. At the time of IPG replacement, 200 patients received antibiotic envelope (54 female, 146 male, mean age 72 years), and 227 did not (43 female, 184 male, mean age 71 years). The two groups were homogenous for risk factors of infection. The IPG replacement infection rate was 2.1% (9/427). There were six infections, which required antibiotic therapy and/or IPG removal, in the antibiotic envelope group (6/200) and three in the non-envelope group (3/227) (p = 0.66). CONCLUSION: This prospective randomised study did not find that an antibiotic envelope reduced the IPG infection rate in our 427 patients undergoing routine DBS IPG replacement. Further research to reduce IPG revisions and infections in a cost-effective manner is required.

Preventing Sudden Cessation of Implantable Pulse Generators in Deep Brain Stimulation: A Systematic Review and Protocol Proposal.

INTRODUCTION: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) requires a consistent electrical supply from the implantable pulse generator (IPG). Patients may struggle to monitor their IPG, risking severe complications in battery failure. This review assesses current literature on DBS IPG battery life management and proposes a protocol for healthcare providers. METHODS: A literature search using four databases identified best practices for DBS IPG management. Studies were appraised for IPG management guidelines, categorized as qualitative, quantitative, or both. RESULTS: Of 408 citations, only seven studies were eligible, none providing clear patient management strategies. Current guidelines lack specificity, relying on clinician suggestions. CONCLUSION: Limited guidelines exist for IPG management. Specificity and adaptability to emerging technology are crucial. The findings highlight the need for specificity in patients' needs and adaptability to emerging technology in future studies. To address this need, we developed a protocol for DBS IPG management that we have implemented at our own institution. Further research is needed for effective DBS IPG battery life management, preventing therapy cessation complications.

The Development of a New Vagus Nerve Simulation Electroceutical to Improve the Signal Attenuation in a Living Implant Environment.

An electroceutical is a medical device that uses electrical signals to control biological functions. It can be inserted into the human body as an implant and has several crucial advantages over conventional medicines for certain diseases. This research develops a new vagus nerve simulation (VNS) electroceutical through an innovative approach to overcome the communication limitations of existing devices. A phased array antenna with a better communication performance was developed and applied to the electroceutical prototype. In order to effectively respond to changes in communication signals, we developed the steering algorithm and firmware, and designed the smart communication protocol that operates at a low power that is safe for the patients. This protocol is intended to improve a communication sensitivity related to the transmission and reception distance. Based on this technical approach, the heightened effectiveness and safety of the prototype have been ascertained, with the actual clinical tests using live animals. We confirmed the signal attenuation performance to be excellent, and a smooth communication was achieved even at a distance of 7 m. The prototype showed a much wider communication range than any other existing products. Through this, it is conceivable that various problems due to space constraints can be resolved, hence presenting many benefits to the patients whose last resort to the disease is the VNS electroceutical.

How Long Does Deep Brain Stimulation Give Patients Benefit?

INTRODUCTION: One of the most common questions patients ask when they are contemplating deep brain stimulation (DBS) is how long it will last. To guide physicians in answering this query, we performed a scoping review to assess the current state of the literature and to identify the gaps that need to be addressed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors performed a MEDLINE search inclusive of articles from January 1987 (advent of DBS literature) to June 2023 including human and modeling studies written in English. For longevity of therapy data, only studies with a mean follow-up of ≥three years were included. Using the Rayyan platform, two reviewers (JP and RM) performed a title screen. Of the 734 articles, 205 were selected by title screen and 109 from abstract review. Ultimately, a total of 122 articles were reviewed. The research questions we explored were 1) how long can the different components of the DBS system maintain functionality? and 2) how long can DBS remain efficacious in treating Parkinson's disease (PD), essential tremor (ET), dystonia, and other disorders? RESULTS: We showed that patients with PD, ET, and dystonia maintain a considerable long-term benefit in motor scores seven to ten years after implant, although the percentage improvement decreases over time. Stimulation off scores in PD and ET show worsening, consistent with disease progression. Battery life varies by the disease treated and the programming settings used. There remains a paucity of literature after ten years, and the impact of new device technology has not been classified to date. CONCLUSION: We reviewed existing data on DBS longevity. Overall, outcomes data after ten years of therapy are substantially limited in the current literature. We recommend that physicians who have data for patients with DBS exceeding this duration publish their results.

Preoperative Counseling in Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Designated Driver in Implantable Pulse Generator-Related Inconveniences?

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been reported to cause substantial pain relief and improved quality of life (QoL) in patients with persistent spinal pain syndrome (PSPS). Despite implantable pulse generator (IPG)-related inconveniences such as pain, shame, and discomfort affecting QoL and patient satisfaction, these are often neglected. Hence, the current study aims to determine the associations between patient satisfaction, IPG-related inconveniences, and preoperative counseling in a homogeneous group of patients with PSPS receiving SCS with IPG implantation in the gluteal or abdominal area. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective data on sample characteristics were gathered from the EPIC (electronic health record software) digital patient data base. Prospective data on patient satisfaction were obtained with a questionnaire that covered various topics such as shame, pain, disturbances in daily/intense activities, night rest and/or sleep, discomfort caused by clothing, and preoperative counseling. The exact location of the IPG and its scar were determined with photo analysis. Thereafter, the site of IPG placement was classified into separate quadrants within the gluteal and abdominal area. Patient satisfaction was defined as accepting the current location of the IPG without having the wish to undergo revision surgery. RESULTS: In total, 81 participants (50.9 ± 10 years) were included in this analysis, with patient satisfaction observed in 61 patients (75.3%). Among satisfied patients, more extensive preoperative counseling concerning IPG pain and discomfort was reported compared with patients who were not satisfied (p < 0.001). When comparing the two groups, significant differences were found in shame (8/81, 9.9%), IPG site pain (21/81, 25.9%), disturbance of activities (42/81, 51.9%), and clothing-related discomfort (42/81, 51.9%). CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the current results, shared decision-making and comprehensive preoperative provision of information are recommended to optimize patient satisfaction regarding IPG pain, discomfort, and inconveniences. Although many patients experience these disadvantages despite successful SCS for pain related to PSPS, most of them accept this if they have received adequate preoperative information about expectations.

MRI conditional safety of mixed systems: Study of the impact of active implant medical device impedance on the radiofrequency-induced lead heating.

PURPOSE: The aim of this paper is to study the impact of pulse generator small impedance variations on the overall radiofrequency (RF)-induced heating of a cardiac rhythm management (CRM) lead in a 1.5 T MR system. METHODS: An analysis was conducted on two CRM pacing leads with different structural designs. The leads were connected to three CRM devices belonging to different technological platforms: two pacemakers and a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D). All pulse generators had a small (< 5 % $$ 5\% $$ ) RF input impedance compared to the overall system (pulse generator and lead) impedance. In addition, two Dummy load devices with an input impedance that is not negligible compared to the lead impedance were also studied. The implantable systems were studied in terms of RF deposited power at the lead electrodes, which is proportional to the RF-induced heating. RESULTS: Results show that both leads behave very similarly in terms of RF deposited power for the same in-vivo tangential E-field excitation when mounting any of the pulse generators; reported differences are well below the combined uncertainty ( k = 1 ) $$ \left(k=1\right) $$ . On the other hand, both Dummy load devices resulted in a RF deposited power which differs from the other pulse generators by values larger than the combined uncertainty. CONCLUSION: The results of our experimental analysis show that different pulse generators would not change the RF-induced heating behavior of a given lead, provided that the pulse generator impedances are small (in our study less than 5%) compared to the overall system impedance.

Choice of Implantable Pulse Generators for Deep Brain Stimulation: An Overview of Clinical Practice.

INTRODUCTION: The success of deep brain stimulation (DBS) treatment depends on several factors, including proper patient selection, accurate electrode placement, and adequate stimulation settings. Another factor that may impact long-term satisfaction and therapy outcomes is the type of implantable pulse generator (IPG) used: rechargeable or non-rechargeable. However, there are currently no guidelines on the choice of IPG type. The present study investigates the current practices, opinions, and factors DBS clinicians consider when choosing an IPG for their patients. METHODS: Between December 2021 and June 2022, we sent a structured questionnaire with 42 questions to DBS experts of two international, functional neurosurgery societies. The questionnaire included a rating scale where participants could rate the factors influencing their choice of IPG type and their satisfaction with certain IPG aspects. Additionally, we presented four clinical case scenarios to assess preference of choice of IPG-type in each case. RESULTS: Eighty-seven participants from 30 different countries completed the questionnaire. The three most relevant factors for IPG choice were "existing social support," "cognitive status," and "patient age." Most participants believed that patients valued avoiding repetitive replacement surgeries more than the burden of regularly recharging the IPG. Participants reported that they implanted the same amount of rechargeable as non-rechargeable IPGs for primary DBS insertions and 20% converted non-rechargeable to rechargeable IPGs during IPG replacements. Most participants estimated that rechargeable was the more cost-effective option. CONCLUSION: This present study shows that the decision-making of the choice of IPG is very individualized. We identified the key factors influencing the physician's choice of IPG. Compared to patient-centric studies, clinicians may value different aspects. Therefore, clinicians should rely not only on their opinion but also counsel patients on different types of IPGs and consider the patient's preferences. Uniform global guidelines on IPG choice may not represent regional or national differences in the healthcare systems.

Preliminary Experience with a Four-Lead Implantable Pulse Generator for Deep Brain Stimulation.

BACKGROUND: Implantable pulse generators (IPGs) store energy and deliver electrical impulses for deep brain stimulation (DBS) to treat neurological and psychiatric disorders. IPGs have evolved over time to meet the demands of expanding clinical indications and more nuanced therapeutic approaches. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the workflow of the first 4-lead IPG for DBS in patients with complex disease. METHOD: The engineering capabilities, clinical use cases, and surgical technique are described in a cohort of 12 patients with epilepsy, essential tremor, Parkinson's disease, mixed tremor, and Tourette's syndrome with comorbid obsessive-compulsive disorder between July 2021 and July 2022. RESULTS: This system is a rechargeable 32-channel, 4-port system with independent current control that can be connected to 8 contact linear or directionally segmented leads. The system is ideal for patients with mixed disease or those with multiple severe symptoms amenable to >2 lead implantations. A multidisciplinary team including neurologists, radiologists, and neurosurgeons is necessary to safely plan the procedure. There were no serious intraoperative or postoperative adverse events. One patient required revision surgery for bowstringing. CONCLUSIONS: This new 4-lead IPG represents an important new tool for DBS surgery with the ability to expand lead implantation paradigms for patients with complex disease.

Cosmetic considerations for placement of deep brain stimulation pulse generator: the submammary subfascial approach.

INTRODUCTION: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for a number of debilitating neurological diseases. However, the placement of an implantable pulse generator (IPG) can lead to significant cosmetic concerns for some patients. METHODS: We present a subfascial technique of DBS IPG implantation under the breast using a more concealed scar location. The technique is illustrated in a female patient who favored a more aesthetic placement of the DBS to treat essential tremor. Relevant literature of this approach from both breast augmentation and cardiac pacemaker implantation was reviewed. RESULTS: An excellent cosmetic outcome was demonstrated, and reviewing the literature, implanting under the pectoralis major fascia has the potential benefit of reducing complication rates associated with silicone implant placement in the plastic surgery literature when compared to other planes. CONCLUSIONS: The subfascial implantation of IPG was described. This plane, which is used routinely in breast augmentation, has the potential to decrease complication rates compared to placement in the subglandular plane. An inframammary incision provides patients with concerns about the scar and stigmata associated with an infraclavicular location of DBS generator a better cosmetic outcome.

A Retrospective Cohort Study of Implantable Pulse Generator Surgical Site Infections After Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery With an Antibacterial Envelope.

INTRODUCTION: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery is an established treatment for many patients with neurologic disease, and a common complication of DBS is surgical site infection (SSI). In 2016, neurosurgeons at our institution began enclosing implantable pulse generators (IPGs) within fully absorbable, antibacterial envelopes in patients who underwent initial DBS implantation. We sought to determine whether the use of antibacterial envelopes reduced IPG-related SSIs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of all adult patients who underwent initial DBS implantation at Stanford Hospital between November 14, 2012, and November 9, 2020. Operative details, perioperative antibiotics, comorbidities, and postoperative complications were extracted for all patients. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to identify factors associated with SSIs within three months of surgery, and interrupted time-series analysis was performed to assess whether the departmental adoption of the antibacterial envelope led to a reduction in IPG SSIs. RESULTS: Of 344 patients who underwent initial IPG implantation with the antibacterial envelope, one developed an SSI within three months of surgery (0.3%), compared with six of 204 patients (2.9%) who underwent the same procedure without the antibacterial envelope (odds ratio: 0.10, 95% CI: 0.01-0.80, p = 0.031). Univariate logistic regression revealed that the antibacterial envelope and 2000-mg intravenous cefazolin perioperatively were associated with reduced SSI risk, whereas no other factors reached statistical significance. After adjusting for comorbidities, no association remained statistically significant. Interrupted time-series analysis showed a reduction in SSIs after 2016, but the effect was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: The adoption of antibacterial envelopes was found to reduce IPG SSIs at the univariate level, but this association did not remain significant after controlling for confounding variables including perioperative antibiotic administration. Although encouraging, this study does not conclusively establish that the use of antibacterial pouches in patients who underwent initial DBS implantation reduces the incidence of IPG SSIs. Future prospective studies that control for confounding variables are necessary to determine the efficacy of antibacterial envelopes in reducing post-DBS infections at the IPG site before clear recommendations can be made.

Early Experience With a Novel Miniaturized Spinal Cord Stimulation System for the Management of Chronic Intractable Pain of the Back and Legs.

INTRODUCTION: A novel, spinal cord stimulation (SCS) system with a battery-free miniaturized implantable pulse generator (IPG) was used in this feasibility study. The system uses an external power source that communicates bidirectionally with the IPG (< 1.5 cm3). Human factors, subject comfort, and effects on low back and leg pain were evaluated in this first-in-human study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, open-label clinical trial was initiated to evaluate the safety and performance of a novel miniaturized stimulator in the treatment of chronic, intractable leg and low-back pain. Eligible subjects were recruited for the study and gave consent. Subjects who passed the screening/trial phase (defined as ≥ 50% decrease in pain) continued to the long-term implant phase and were followed up at predefined time points after device activation. Interim clinical and usability outcomes were captured and reported at 90 days. RESULTS: Results of 22 subjects who chose a novel pulsed stimulation pattern therapy using the battery-free IPG (< 1.5 cm3) are described here. At 90-days follow-up, the average pain reduction was 79% in the leg (n = 22; p < 0.0001) and 76% in the low back (n = 21; p < 0.0001) compared with baseline. Responder rates (≥ 50% pain relief) at 90 days were 86% in leg pain (19/22) and 81% in low-back pain (17/21). Subjects rated the level of comfort of the external wearable power source to be 0.41 ± 0.73 at 90 days on an 11-point rating scale (0 = very comfortable, 10 = very uncomfortable). DISCUSSION: These interim results from the ongoing study indicate the favorable efficacy and usability of a novel, externally powered, battery-free SCS IPG (< 1.5 cm3) for leg and low-back pain. Study subjects wore the external power source continuously and found it comfortable, and the system provided significant pain relief. These preliminary findings warrant further investigation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Clinicaltrials.gov registration number for the study is ACTRN12618001862235.

Real-life after sacral nerve modulation implantation: Rate, reasons, and risk factors for mid-term follow-up discontinuation.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate follow-up after implantation of a sacral nerve modulation implantable pulse generator (IPG) and to investigate the reasons and risk factors for follow-up discontinuation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent an IPG implantation to treat lower urinary tract symptoms between 2014-2019 within 6 hospital centers located in the district of "Hauts-de-France" (France) were systematically called during the year 2020 for a standardized (tele)consultation. Patients were divided into 3 distinct profiles according to the regularity of their 5-year postoperative follow-up: "Regular follow-up", "Irregular follow-up" and "Lost to follow-up". The primary outcome was the change in the annual proportion of the 3 follow-up profiles over the 5 years following IPG implantation. As secondary outcomes we described the reasons reported for follow-up discontinuation and looked for risk factors associated with. RESULTS: Overall, 259 patients were included. At the time of data collection, after a mean follow-up of 28.4 (± 19.8) months, 139 patients (53.7%) had a "Regular follow-up", 54 (20.8%) had an "Irregular follow-up" and 66 (25.5%) were "Lost to follow-up". The proportion of patients with a "Regular follow-up" decreased year by year, representing only 46.2% of patients at five-years. 175 patients (67.6%) underwent a standardized (tele)consultation. In multivariate analysis, only "lack of knowledge of the follow-up protocol" was statistically associated with follow-up discontinuation (OR=5.16; 95% CI [2.12-13.57]). CONCLUSION: The proportion of patients followed up after IPG implantation decreased steadily over the years, often related to a lack of therapeutic education.

Novel spinal cord stimulation system with a Battery-Free micro-implantable pulse generator.

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is effective for the treatment of chronic intractable pain of the trunk and limbs. The mechanism of action may be based, at least in part, upon the gate control theory; however, new waveforms may suggest other mechanisms. Although benefits of the SCS technology generally outweigh the complications associated with SCS, some complications such as infection and skin erosion over the implant can result in device removal. Additional reasons for device removal, such as pocket pain and battery depletion, have driven technological innovations including battery-free implants and device miniaturization. The neurostimulation system described here was specifically designed to address complications commonly associated with implantable batteries and/or larger implantable devices. The benefits of the small size are further augmented by a minimally invasive implant procedure. Usability data show that patients found this novel neurostimulation system to be easy to use and comfortable to wear. What is more, clinical data demonstrate that the use of this system provides statistically significant reduction in pain scores with responder rates (defined as ≥50% reduction in pain) of 78% in the low back and 83% in the leg(s). Advances in miniaturization technology arose from the considerable shrinkage of the integrated circuit, with an increase in performance, according to Moore's law (1965). However, commensurate improvements in battery technology have not maintained a similar pace. This has prompted some manufacturers to place the battery outside, against the skin, thereby allowing a massive reduction in the implant volume, with the hopes of fewer device-related complications.

Factors Associated With Implantable Pulse Generator Site Pain: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.

OBJECTIVES: Implantable pulse generator (IPG) site pain following neuromodulation procedures is a recognized complication. The site of the IPG placement varies depending on the neuromodulation type and physician preference. The incidence of IPG site pain as a function of the site of IPG implantation has not been studied systematically. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a multicenter cross-sectional survey of the incidence, severity, and quality of IPG site pain, location of the IPG, the pain management needs, functional impairment, and cosmetic appearance related to the IPG placement. Contingency table analysis was conducted for categorical variables, and logistic regression analysis and linear regression model was used. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 60.5% (n = 510). Overall, 31.0% of patients reported pain at the IPG site in the last 72 hours with 31.4% reporting moderate to severe pain and 7.6% reporting severe pain. Older age was inversely associated with IPG-related pain (OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.96-0.99, p = 0.001). IPG implantation site did not have a statistically significant interaction with IPG site pain (p > 0.05). The most important factor for IPG site-associated pain was having a spinal cord stimulator implanted as compared to a deep brain stimulator, or sacral nerve stimulator. Most subjects reported no functional impairment related to IPG site pain (91%), found the IPG site pain as expected (80%), and found IPG site cosmetic appearance as expected (96%). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of IPG site pain is an important complication of invasive neuromodulation. The anatomic location of the IPG placement does not appear to affect the incidence or severity of IPG site pain. However, the presence of a pre-implant chronic pain disorder does appear to affect the frequency and severity of IPG site pain.

Implantable Pulse Generator Site May Be Associated With Spinal Cord Stimulation Revision Surgeries.

BACKGROUND: The use of implantable pulse generators (IPG) for spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in patients with chronic pain has been well established. Although IPG-related complications have been reported on, the association between IPG site and SCS complications has not been well studied. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether IPG placement site in buttock or flank is associated with SCS complications and, hence, revision surgeries. METHOD: A retrospective cohort study was performed that included 330 patients (52% female) treated at a single institution who underwent permanent implantation of an SCS system between 2014 and 2018. Patients ranged between 20 and 94 years of age (mean: 57.54 ± 13.25). Statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics. Tests included independent samples t test, chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U test, Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, and logistic regression. RESULTS: There was a total of 93 revision surgeries (rate of 28%), where 71 out of 330 patients (rate of 21.5%) had had at least one revision surgery. Univariate tests demonstrated a significant association between IPG site and revision surgeries (p = 0.028 [chi-square test] and p = 0.031 [Mann-Whitney U test]); however, multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that neither IPG site was more likely than the other to require revision surgeries (p = 0.286). CONCLUSION: Although this study found a significant association between IPG site and revision surgeries, the effect of IPG site was not found to be predictive. The IPG site likely influences whether a patient will require revision surgery, but further investigation is required to establish this association.

Neuromodulatory hacking: a review of the technology and security risks of spinal cord stimulation.

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a neuromodulatory technique used to relieve chronic pain. Previous instances of malicious remote control of implantable medical devices, including insulin delivery pumps and implantable cardiac defibrillators, have been documented. Though no cases of neuromodulatory hacking have been recorded outside of the academic setting, an understanding of SCS technology and the possible consequences of manipulation is important in promoting safety. METHODS: We review the components and implantation protocol of a SCS system, the functionality and technological specifications for SCS systems in the global market based on their device manuals, and patient- and clinician-specific adjustable factors. Furthermore, we assess documented instances of implantable medical device hacking and speculate on the potential harms of targeting SCS systems. RESULTS: SCS systems from Abbott Laboratories, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Nevro have unique functionality and technological specifications. Six parameters in device control can potentially be targeted and elicit various harms, including loss of therapeutic effect, accelerated battery drainage, paresthesia in unintended locations, muscle weakness or dysfunction, tissue burn, and electrical shock. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the history of implantable medical device hacking, SCS systems may also be susceptible to manipulation. As the prevalence of SCS use increases and SCS systems continuously evolve in the direction of wireless control and compatibility with mobile devices, appropriate measures should be taken by manufacturers and governmental agencies to ensure safety.

The Importance of the Location of Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulator Electrodes Within the Nerve Root Exit Foramen.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the relationship between the electrical power requirement to achieve pain relief and the position of the active electrode of dorsal root ganglion stimulators within the spinal nerve root exit foramen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of 92 consecutive patients undergoing dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS) for chronic pain in a single center. Cervical and sacral cases, and failed trials/explanted DRGS were excluded, so we report on 57 patients with 78 implanted leads. Anteroposterior and lateral fluoroscopic images of the lead in the exit foramen were examined, and the active electrode positions were put into categories depending on their location relative to fixed anatomical landmarks. The clinical outcome and the power requirements for each of these groups of electrodes were then analyzed. Overall pain outcome was assessed by numeric pain rating scale score pre-operatively and post-operatively. RESULTS: There was no significant relationship between power requirements and mediolateral electrode position, although the lowest average was observed with electrode positions directly below the center of the pedicle. On lateral x-ray, the lowest power requirements were observed in the electrodes positioned superodorsally or dorsally within the foramen. Importantly, power requirements in this location were consistently low, while the power requirements in other locations were not only higher but also much more variable. Electrodes in the superodorsal position required a median output power almost four times lower than electrodes in other positions (p = 0.002). Clinical outcome was not significantly related to power requirement or foraminal position. CONCLUSION: Aiming for a superodorsal electrode position on lateral intraoperative fluoroscopy is desirable, since siting leads in this location reduces the required stimulator output power very substantially and thus will extend battery life. Position within the foramen does not determine clinical outcome, and so the implanter can safely aim for the low power site without detriment to the analgesic efficacy of the system.

Neurological Worsening After Implantable Pulse Generator Replacement.

BACKGROUND: Most of the implantable pulse generators (IPGs) in deep brain stimulation (DBS) used to date are non-rechargeable requiring regular replacements. IPG replacement is a minor surgical procedure, but adverse events including neurological worsening have been reported. In this study, we determine the possibility of neurological worsening after IPG replacement in Parkinson's disease (PD) cases on chronic DBS therapy (CDT) and its electrophysiological basis along with the therapeutic interventions used to alleviate them. METHODS: This study is a retrospective chart review of PD cases on CDT followed at London Movement Disorders Centre from January 2010 to December 2016. Included cases were those who underwent one or more IPG replacement. RESULTS: A total of 45 PD cases on CDT underwent 62 IPG replacements involving 121 channels. Neurological worsening was observed in 16 (35.5%) cases following 17 (27.4%) IPG replacements, all following dual-channel IPG replacements. Tremor (41.2%), speech (35.3%), and gait (23.5%) worsened most commonly. Deviation from the pre-replacement parameters including voltage and impedance resulting in change in total electrical energy delivered (TEED) was the most common electrophysiological correlate, observed in 82.4% (14/17) IPGs having neurological worsening. This included switched laterality in a dual-channel IPG. Neurological worsening in the remaining 17.6% cases was hardware-related. CONCLUSION: Neurological worsening followed 27.4% of IPG replacements in PD cases on CDT with approximately 82.4% of these being avoidable by carefully monitoring stimulation parameters to match pre-replacement TEED values.

Évolution défavorable de l'état neurologique de patients après le remplacement de leur générateur d'impulsions implantable. CONTEXTE: La plupart des générateurs d'impulsions implantables (GII) utilisés jusqu'à présent lors de séances de stimulation cérébrale profonde (SCP) ne peuvent être rechargés, ce qui nécessite des remplacements à intervalles réguliers. Même si le remplacement d'un GII demeure une intervention chirurgicale mineure, des manifestations indésirables, notamment la détérioration neurologique de certains patients, ont été signalées. Dans cette étude, nous voulons donc déterminer, après le remplacement d'un GII, les possibilités de détérioration neurologique de patients atteints de la maladie de Parkinson (MP). Rappelons que ces patients ont entrepris, de concert avec d'autres interventions thérapeutiques, des séances de SCP en vue de réduire leurs douleurs chroniques. MÉTHODES: Nous avons donc passé en revue de façon rétrospective les dossiers de patients atteints de MP et bénéficiant de séances de SCP. Ces patients avaient été suivis au London Movement Disorders Centre de janvier 2010 à décembre 2016. Soulignons aussi qu'ils ont subi un ou plusieurs remplacements de leur GII en cours d'étude. RÉSULTATS: Au total, 45 patients atteints de MP bénéficiant de SCP visant à soulager leurs douleurs chroniques ont été visés par 62 remplacements de GII impliquant 121 canaux. Une détérioration neurologique a été observée chez 16 patients (35,5 %) à la suite de 17 (27,4 %) remplacements de GII, lesquels ayant tous été effectués à la suite de remplacements de GII double canal. Parmi les aspects s'étant le plus souvent détériorés, mentionnons des tremblements (41,2 %), la parole (35,3 %) et la démarche (23,5 %). Une déviation par rapport aux paramètres de pré-remplacement, ce qui inclut la tension et l'impédance, tous deux pouvant entraîner des modifications à l'énergie électrique totale produite, est apparue comme le corrélat électro-physiologique le plus fréquent. Ce dernier a en effet été observé dans 82,4 % (14/17) des remplacements de GII ayant entraîné une détérioration neurologique. Cela a inclus notamment une latéralité inversée dans le cas de GII double canal. Quant aux 17,6 % des autres cas, la détérioration neurologique peut s'expliquer par le matériel lui-même. CONCLUSION: Une forme de détérioration neurologique a accompagné 27,4 % des remplacements de GII chez des patients atteints de MP et nécessitant des séances de SCP pour soulager leurs douleurs chroniques. Environ 82,4 % de ces cas seraient évitables en surveillant attentivement les paramètres de stimulation pour qu'ils correspondent ainsi aux niveaux d'énergie électrique totale produits avant remplacement.

Clinical and Economic Benefits of Upper Airway Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in a European Setting.

BACKGROUND: Upper airway stimulation (UAS) is a treatment approach for patients with moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea who cannot adhere to continuous positive airway pressure therapy. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate added patient benefit and cost-effectiveness of UAS in the German health care system. METHODS: We used a decision-analytic Markov model to project major adverse cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events (myocardial infarction [MI] or stroke), motor vehicle collision (MVC), mortality, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and costs. The assumed reduction in the apnea-hypopnea index with UAS compared to no treatment is based on German real-world data. Other input data were derived from the literature, public statistics, and multivariate regression. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated in Euros per QALY gained, both discounted at 3%. RESULTS: UAS was projected to reduce event risks (10-year relative risk for stroke, MI, cardiovascular death, and MVC: 0.76, 0.64, 0.65, and 0.34, respectively), and to increase survival by 1.27 years. While the UAS strategy incurred an additional 1.02 QALYs within the patient lifetime, there were also additional costs of EUR 45,196, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of EUR 44,446 per QALY gained. -Conclusions: In the present model-based analysis, UAS therapy provides meaningful benefit to patient-relevant endpoints and is a cost-effective therapy in the German setting.

Implementation of New Technology in Patients with Chronic Deep Brain Stimulation: Switching from Non-Rechargeable Constant Voltage to Rechargeable Constant Current Stimulation.

INTRODUCTION: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) for movement disorders has been mainly performed with constant voltage (CV) technology. More recently also constant current (CC) systems have been developed which theoretically might have additional advantages. Furthermore, rechargeable (RC) system implantable pulse generators (IPG) are increasingly being used rather than the former solely available non-rechargeable (NRC) IPGs. OBJECTIVE: To provide a systematic investigation how to proceed and adapt settings when switching from CV NRC to CC RC technology. METHODS: We prospectively collected data from 11 consecutive patients (10 men, mean age at DBS implantation 52.6 ± 14.0 years) with chronic DBS for dystonia (n = 7), Parkinson disease (n = 3), and essential tremor (n = 1) who underwent IPG replacement switching from a CV NRC system (Activa® PC; Medtronic®) to a CC RC system (Vercise® RC; Boston Scientific®). Systematic assessments before and after IPG replacement were performed. RESULTS: DBS technology switching at the time of IPG replacement due to battery depletion was at a mean of 108.5 ± 46.2 months of chronic DBS. No perioperative complications occurred. Clinical outcome was stable with overall mild improvements or deteriorations, which could be dealt with in short-term follow-up. Patients were satisfied with the new RC IPG. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms both the safety and feasibility of switching between different DBS technologies (CV to CC, NRC to RC, different manufacturers) in patients with chronic DBS. Furthermore, it shows how the management can be planned using available information from the previous DBS settings. Individual assessment is needed and might partly be related to the DBS target and the underlying disease. MR safety might be a problem with such hybrid systems.