HIV-related Shame among Women Giving Birth in Tanzania: A Mixed Methods Study.

Women living with HIV (WLHIV) commonly experience HIV-related shame which can interfere with HIV care-seeking behavior and lead to poor clinical outcomes. HIV-related shame may be particularly heightened during the pregnancy and postpartum periods. This study aimed to describe HIV-related shame among WLHIV giving birth, identify associated factors, and qualitatively examine the impacts of HIV-related shame on the childbirth experience. Postpartum WLHIV (n = 103) were enrolled in the study between March and July 2022 at six clinics in the Kilimanjaro Region, Tanzania. Participants completed a survey within 48 h after birth, prior to being discharged. The survey included a 13-item measure of HIV-related shame, which assessed levels of HIV-related shame (Range: 0-52). Univariable and multivariable regression models examined factors associated with HIV-related shame. Qualitative in-depth interviews were conducted with pregnant WLHIV (n = 12) and postpartum WLHIV (n = 12). Thematic analysis, including memo writing, coding, and synthesis, was employed to analyze the qualitative data. The survey sample had a mean age of 29.1 (SD = 5.7), and 52% were diagnosed with HIV during the current pregnancy. Nearly all participants (98%) endorsed at least one item reflecting HIV-related shame, with an average endorsement of 9 items (IQR = 6). In the final multivariable model, HIV-related shame was significantly associated with being Muslim vs. Christian (ß = 6.80; 95%CI: 1.51, 12.09), attending less than four antenatal care appointments (ß = 5.30; 95%CI: 0.04, 10.55), and reporting experiences of HIV stigma in the health system (ß = 0.69; 95%CI: 0.27, 1.12). Qualitative discussions revealed three key themes regarding the impact of HIV-related shame on the childbirth experience: reluctance to disclose HIV status, suboptimal adherence to care, and the influence on social support networks. WLHIV giving birth experience high rates of HIV-related shame, and social determinants may contribute to feelings of shame. HIV-related shame impacts the childbirth experience for WLHIV, making the labor and delivery setting an important site for intervention and support.The study is funded by the National Institutes of Health (R21 TW012001) and is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05271903).

A wider agreement is needed on basic intrapartum concepts.

Healthcare professionals working in labor wards worldwide regularly deal with the pressure of managing an emotionally charged and life-changing period for women, their families, and their friends. Furthermore, they frequently deal with long working hours, sleep deprivation, occasional scrutiny from the press, and legal dispute. The existing disagreements among leading scientific institutions on basic concepts of intrapartum care hinder the creation of a collective mental model in the labor ward, an aspect that is required for consistency in patient counseling and effective teamwork. Some of these disagreements are as follows: 1. When should laboring women be admitted to the hospital? 2. How long is the absence of labor progress acceptable before an intervention is proposed? 3. How long should women be allowed to push during the second stage of labor before an intervention is proposed? The international scientific community owes it to the vast number of healthcare professionals working in labor wards worldwide to agree on and provide clear definitions of these basic intrapartum concepts, thus making their work a little easier. International institutions, such as the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics and the World Health Organization, have the highest authority to produce guidelines for the whole world, but the participation of leading national organizations, whose influence reaches well beyond the borders of their countries, is important for the wide dissemination of concepts.

Birthing balls to decrease labor pain and peanut balls to decrease length of labor: what is the evidence?

Birthing balls and peanut balls have been used for decades by nurses and midwives as a nonpharmacologic adjunct to labor management based on anecdotal evidence. This article aimed to review the evidence regarding their safety and efficacy based on randomized controlled trials. Birthing balls are round exercise balls that a laboring individual can use for sitting, rocking, and pelvic rotation. The use of the birthing balls has been thought to increase maternal comfort and mimic upright positioning to widen the pelvic outlet for those laboring without an epidural. A recent meta-analysis showed that the use of the birthing ball in labor significantly reduces maternal pain in labor by 1.7 points on a standard visual analog scale of 1 to 10 (mean difference, -1.70 points; 95% confidence interval, -2.20 to -1.20). The use of the birthing ball does not significantly affect the mode of delivery or the rate of other obstetrical complications. This suggests that its use is safe and can offer subjective improvement in maternal pain experienced during labor. The peanut ball is a peanut-shaped plastic ball placed between the knees of a person laboring in the lateral recumbent position, a position common in those laboring with an epidural. Traditionally, its use has been thought to allow for bent-knee positioning that can mimic a squatting position and facilitate frequent and optimal position changes during labor. Data regarding the effects of the peanut ball are mixed. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis found that the use of the peanut ball compared with no peanut ball is associated with a significantly decreased first stage of labor (mean difference, -87.42 minutes; 95% confidence interval, -94.49 to -80.34) and an 11% higher relative risk of vaginal delivery (relative risk, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.22; n=669). The use of the peanut ball is not associated with increased incidences of obstetrical complications. As such, it is reasonable to offer to individuals in labor. There has been no reported risk of the use of either the birthing ball or the peanut ball. As such, both interventions can be offered to individuals in labor as an adjunct to labor management techniques based on moderate quality evidence.

Natural language processing of admission notes to predict severe maternal morbidity during the delivery encounter.

BACKGROUND: Severe maternal morbidity and mortality remain public health priorities in the United States, given their high rates relative to other high-income countries and the notable racial and ethnic disparities that exist. In general, accurate risk stratification methods are needed to help patients, providers, hospitals, and health systems plan for and potentially avert adverse outcomes. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to understand if machine learning methods with natural language processing of history and physical notes could identify a group of patients at high risk of maternal morbidity on admission for delivery without relying on any additional patient information (eg, demographics and diagnosis codes). STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective study of people admitted for delivery at 2 hospitals (hospitals A and B) in a single healthcare system between July 1, 2016, and June 30, 2020. The primary outcome was severe maternal morbidity, as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; furthermore, we examined nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity. Clinician documents designated as history and physical notes were extracted from the electronic health record for processing and analysis. A bag-of-words approach was used for this natural language processing analysis (ie, each history or physical note was converted into a matrix of counts of individual words (or phrases) that occurred within the document). The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator models were used to generate prediction probabilities for severe maternal morbidity and nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity for each note. Model discrimination was assessed via the area under the receiver operating curve. Discrimination was compared between models using the DeLong test. Calibration plots were generated to assess model calibration. Moreover, the natural language processing models with history and physical note texts were compared with validated obstetrical comorbidity risk scores based on diagnosis codes. RESULTS: There were 13,572 delivery encounters with history and physical notes from hospital A, split between training (Atrain, n=10,250) and testing (Atest, n=3,322) datasets for model derivation and internal validation. There were 23,397 delivery encounters with history and physical notes from hospital B (Bvalid) used for external validation. For the outcome of severe maternal morbidity, the natural language processing model had an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.67 (95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.72) and 0.72 (95% confidence interval, 0.70-0.74) in the Atest and Bvalid datasets, respectively. For the outcome of nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity, the area under the receiver operating curve was 0.72 (95% confidence interval, 0.65-0.80) and 0.76 (95% confidence interval, 0.73-0.79) in the Atest and Bvalid datasets, respectively. The calibration plots demonstrated the bag-of-words model's ability to distinguish a group of individuals at a substantially higher risk of severe maternal morbidity and nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity, notably those in the top deciles of predicted risk. Areas under the receiver operating curve in the natural language processing-based models were similar to those generated using a validated, retrospectively derived, diagnosis code-based comorbidity score. CONCLUSION: In this practical application of machine learning, we demonstrated the capabilities of natural language processing for the prediction of severe maternal morbidity based on provider documentation inherently generated at the time of admission. This work should serve as a catalyst for providers, hospitals, and electronic health record systems to explore ways that artificial intelligence can be incorporated into clinical practice and evaluated rigorously for their ability to improve health.

Impact of implementation of the Maternal-Fetal Triage Index on patients presenting with severe hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Severe hypertension remains one of the leading preventable causes of maternal mortality in the United States. Timeliness to response to severe hypertension in pregnancy is a crucial quality indicator tracked by state and national organizations. We hypothesized that the implementation of the Maternal-Fetal Triage Index, a validated acuity tool, would improve care performance in women with severe hypertension in an urban, inner-city hospital setting. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the impact of the Maternal-Fetal Triage Index on the management of women presenting with severe preeclampsia diagnosed by severe hypertension as measured by time to provider assessment, administration of magnesium sulfate, and immediate administration of acute antihypertensives. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective, observational study of pregnant women presenting to the labor and delivery triage unit with severe preeclampsia diagnosed by severe hypertension giving birth at a large urban inner-city academic facility before (epoch 1: January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019) and after (epoch 2: March 1, 2021, to September 31, 2021) the implementation of the Maternal-Fetal Triage Index. Baseline outcomes of time to assessment, time to magnesium sulfate prophylaxis, and time to antihypertensive medication administration before the implementation of the Maternal-Fetal Triage Index were assessed. The Maternal-Fetal Triage Index tool was implemented on March 1, 2021, following standardized education in 2020 for all triage nurses, unit technicians, healthcare unit coordinators, and healthcare providers. Time to assessment, administration of magnesium sulfate prophylaxis, and time to antihypertensive administration after the implementation of the Maternal-Fetal Triage Index were compared with measures before the implementation of the Maternal-Fetal Triage Index. Statistical analysis included Wilcoxon rank-sum test with P<.05 considered significant when comparing epoch 1 with epoch 2. RESULTS: A total of 370 patients were admitted with severe hypertension in 2019 before the use of the Maternal-Fetal Triage Index, and 254 patients were admitted with severe hypertension in 2021 after the implementation of the Maternal-Fetal Triage Index. There was no difference between epochs across baseline characteristics, including age, race and ethnicity, parity, and body mass index. After the Maternal-Fetal Triage Index was implemented, the time to provider assessment was significantly improved, from a median time of 44 minutes (interquartile range, 0-65) in epoch 1 to 17 minutes (interquartile range, 0-39) in epoch 2 (P<.001). Furthermore, the time from arrival to magnesium sulfate prophylaxis was significantly faster with a median time of 161 minutes (interquartile range, 109-256) in epoch 1 vs 127 minutes (interquartile range, 85-258) in epoch 2 (P=.001). Moreover, there was a decrease in the time from arrival to antihypertensive medication administration for severe blood pressures after the implementation of the Maternal-Fetal Triage Index (101 minutes [interquartile range, 61-177] vs 66 minutes [interquartile range, 35-203]; P<.001). CONCLUSION: The implementation of the Maternal-Fetal Triage Index at a large urban inner-city hospital was associated with improved timeliness of assessment and treatment of women with severe hypertension. The Maternal-Fetal Triage Index is a viable tool to improve the efficiency in triage units, specifically in the management of severe hypertension.

Associations between prolonged second stage of labor and maternal and neonatal outcomes in freestanding birth centers: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines for second stage management do not provide guidance for community birth providers about when best to transfer women to hospital care for prolonged second stage. Our goal was to increase the evidence base for these providers by: 1) describing the lengths of second stage labor in freestanding birth centers, and 2) determining whether proportions of postpartum women and newborns experiencing complications change as length of second stage labor increases. METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of de-identified client-level data collected in the American Association of Birth Centers Perinatal Data Registry, including women giving birth in freestanding birth centers January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2016. We plotted proportions of postpartum women and newborns transferred to hospital care against length of the second stage of labor, and assessed significance of these with the Cochran-Armitage test for trend or chi-square test. Secondary maternal and newborn outcomes were compared for dyads with normal and prolonged second stages of labor using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Second stage labor exceeded 3 hours for 2.3% of primiparous women and 2 hours for 6.6% of multiparous women. Newborn transfers increased as second stage increased from < 15 minutes to > 2 hours (0.6% to 6.33%, p for trend = 0.0008, for primiparous women, and 1.4% to 10.6%, p for trend < 0.0001, for multiparous women.) Postpartum transfers for multiparous women increased from 1.4% after second stage < 15 minutes to greater than 4% for women after second stage exceeding 2 hours (p for trend < 0.0001.) CONCLUSIONS: Complications requiring hospitalization of postpartum women and newborns become more common as the length of the second stage increases. Birth center guidelines should consider not just presence of progress but also absolute length of time as indications for transfer.

Improving communication and teamwork during labor: A feasibility, acceptability, and safety study.

BACKGROUND: TeamBirth was designed to promote best practices in shared decision making (SDM) among care teams for people giving birth. Although leading health organizations recommend SDM to address gaps in quality of care, these recommendations are not consistently implemented in labor and delivery. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods trial of TeamBirth among eligible laboring patients and all clinicians (nurses, midwives, and obstetricians) at four high-volume hospitals during April 2018 to September 2019. We used patient and clinician surveys, abstracted clinical data, and administrative claims to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of TeamBirth. RESULTS: A total of 2,669 patients (approximately 28% of eligible delivery volume) and 375 clinicians (78% response rate) responded to surveys on their experiences with TeamBirth. Among patients surveyed, 89% reported experiencing at least one structured full care team conversation ("huddle") during labor and 77% reported experiencing multiple huddles. There was a significant relationship between the number of reported huddles and patient acceptability (P < 0.001), suggestive of a dose response. Among clinicians surveyed, 90% would recommend TeamBirth for use in other labor and delivery units. There were no significant changes in maternal and newborn safety measures. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing a care process that aims to improve communication and teamwork during labor with high fidelity is feasible. The process is acceptable to patients and clinicians and shows no negative effects on patient safety. Future work should evaluate the effectiveness of TeamBirth in improving care experience and health outcomes.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on perinatal care and outcomes in the United States: An interrupted time series analysis.

BACKGROUND: Hospitals quickly adapted perinatal care to mitigate SARS-CoV-2 transmission at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. The objective of this study was to estimate the impact of pandemic-related hospital policy changes on perinatal care and outcomes in one region of the United States. METHODS: This interrupted time series analysis used retrospective data from consecutive singleton births at 15 hospitals in the Pacific Northwest from 2017 to 2020. The primary outcomes were those hypothesized to be affected by pandemic-related hospital policies and included labor induction, epidural use, oxytocin augmentation, mode of delivery, and early discharge (<48 hours after cesarean and <24 hours after vaginal births). Secondary outcomes included preterm birth, severe maternal morbidity, low 5-minute Apgar score, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, and 30-day readmission. Segmented Poisson regression models estimated the outcome level shift changes after the pandemic onset, controlling for underlying trends, seasonality, and stratifying by parity. RESULTS: No statistically significant changes were detected in intrapartum interventions or mode of delivery after onset of the pandemic. Early discharge increased for all births following cesarean and vaginal birth. Newborn readmission rates increased but only among nulliparas (aRR: 1.49, 95%CI: 1.17, 1.91). Among multiparas, decreases were observed in preterm birth (aRR: 0.90, 95%CI: 0.84, 0.96), low 5-minute Apgar score (aRR: 0.75, 95%CI: 0.68, 0.81), and term NICU admission rates (aRR: 0.85, 95%CI: 0.80, 0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Increases in early discharge and newborn readmission rates among nulliparas suggest a need for more postpartum support during the pandemic. Decreases in preterm birth and term NICU admission among multiparas may have implications beyond the pandemic and deserve further study.

Implementation strategies within a complex environment: A qualitative study of a shared decision-making intervention during childbirth.

BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making (SDM) may improve communication, teamwork, patient experience, respectful maternity care, and safety during childbirth. Despite these benefits, SDM is not widely implemented, and strategies for implementing SDM interventions are not well described. We assessed the acceptability and feasibility of TeamBirth, an SDM solution that centers the birthing person in decision-making through simple tools that structure communication among the care team. We identified and described implementation strategies that bridge the gap between knowledge and practice. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study among four hospitals in the United States to understand the acceptability and feasibility of TeamBirth. We interviewed 103 clinicians and conducted 16 focus group discussions with 52 implementers between June 2018 and October 2019. We drew on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to understand acceptability and feasibility, and to identify and describe the underlying contextual factors that affected implementation. RESULTS: We found that clinicians and implementers valued TeamBirth for promoting clarity about care plans among the direct care team and for centering the birthing person in decision-making. Contextual factors that affected implementation included strength of leadership, physician practice models, and quality improvement culture. Effective implementation strategies included regular data feedback and adapting "flexible" components of TeamBirth to the local context. DISCUSSION: By identifying and describing TeamBirth's contextual factors and implementation strategies, our findings can help bridge the implementation gap of SDM interventions. Our in-depth analysis offers tangible lessons for other labor and delivery unit leaders as they seek to integrate SDM practices in their own settings.

Personalized assessment of cervical length improves prediction of spontaneous preterm birth: a standard and a percentile calculator.

BACKGROUND: A sonographic short cervix (length <25 mm during midgestation) is the most powerful predictor of preterm birth. Current clinical practice assumes that the same cervical length cutoff value should apply to all women when screening for spontaneous preterm birth, yet this approach may be suboptimal. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to (1) create a customized cervical length standard that considers relevant maternal characteristics and gestational age at sonographic examination and (2) assess whether the customization of cervical length evaluation improves the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective analysis comprises a cohort of 7826 pregnant women enrolled in a longitudinal protocol between January 2006 and April 2017 at the Detroit Medical Center. Study participants met the following inclusion criteria: singleton pregnancy, ≥1 transvaginal sonographic measurements of the cervix, delivery after 20 weeks of gestation, and available relevant demographics and obstetrical history information. Data from women without a history of preterm birth or cervical surgery who delivered at term without progesterone treatment (N=5188) were used to create a customized standard of cervical length. The prediction of the primary outcome, spontaneous preterm birth at <37 weeks of gestation, was assessed in a subset of pregnancies (N=7336) that excluded cases with induced labor before 37 weeks of gestation. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and sensitivity at a fixed false-positive rate were calculated for screening at 20 to 23 6/7, 24 to 27 6/7, 28 to 31 6/7, and 32 to 35 6/7 weeks of gestation in asymptomatic patients. Survival analysis was used to determine which method is better at predicting imminent delivery among symptomatic women. RESULTS: The median cervical length remained fundamentally unchanged until 20 weeks of gestation and subsequently decreased nonlinearly with advancing gestational age among women who delivered at term. The effects of parity and maternal weight and height on the cervical length were dependent on the gestational age at ultrasound examination (interaction, P<.05 for all). Parous women had a longer cervix than nulliparous women, and the difference increased with advancing gestation after adjusting for maternal weight and height. Similarly, maternal weight was nonlinearly associated with a longer cervix, and the effect was greater later in gestation. The sensitivity at a 10% false-positive rate for prediction of spontaneous preterm birth at <37 weeks of gestation by a short cervix ranged from 29% to 40% throughout pregnancy, yet it increased to 50%, 50%, 53%, and 54% at 20 to 23 6/7, 24 to 27 6/7, 28 to 31 6/7, and 32 to 35 6/7 weeks of gestation, respectively, for a low, customized percentile (McNemar test, P<.001 for all). When a cervical length <25 mm was compared to the customized screening at 20 to 23 6/7 weeks of gestation by using a customized percentile cutoff value that ensured the same negative likelihood ratio for both screening methods, the customized approach had a significantly higher (about double) positive likelihood ratio in predicting spontaneous preterm birth at <33, <34, <35, <36, and <37 weeks of gestation. Among symptomatic women, the difference in survival between women with a customized cervical length percentile of ≥10th and those with a customized cervical length percentile of <10th was greater than the difference in survival between women with a cervical length ≥25 mm and those with a cervical length <25 mm. CONCLUSION: Compared to the use of a cervical length <25 mm, a customized cervical length assessment (1) identifies more women at risk of spontaneous preterm birth and (2) improves the distinction between patients at risk for impending preterm birth in those who have an episode of preterm labor.

Cultural malpractices during labor/delivery and associated factors among women who had at least one history of delivery in selected Zones of Amhara region, North West Ethiopia: community based cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Every day, at least 810 women die worldwide from the complications of pregnancy and childbirth, 86% of which occurring in Southern Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa. One of the contributing factors for these problems is cultural malpractices during pregnancy and childbirth. The actual incidence of cultural malpractices in developing countries accounts for about 5-15% of maternal deaths. Thus, understanding the link between cultural affairs and maternal health is critical to saving the lives of women and their babies. Therefore, this research was aimed to assess cultural malpractices during labor and delivery and associated factors among women who had at least one history of delivery in selected Zones of the Amhara region, North West Ethiopia. METHOD: Community based cross-sectional study was conducted on women who had at least one delivery history in Awi, West, and East Gojjam Zones from January 1 to May 30, 2020. The multistage cluster sampling technique was used to select 845 study participants. Data was collected through a pre-tested and structured interview questionnaire, entered and cleaned using EPI info version 7.2, and exported to SPSS version 23 for analysis. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression was employed to assess the association of the variables and a P-value less than 0.05 was declared as statistically significant. RESULT: Out of 845 women 162(19.2%) practiced nutritional taboo, 77(9.1%) women practiced abdominal massage and 273(32.3%) delivered their babies at home. Educational status of the respondents being un able to read and write (AOR = 14.35,95% CI: 3.12,65.96), husband's educational status (AOR = 3.80,95% CI: 1.24,11.64), residence (AOR = 2.93,95% CI: 1.41: 6.06), ethnicity (AOR = 2.20,95% CI:1.32, 3.67), pregnancy complications (AOR = 1.61,95% CI:1.02, 2.53), gravidity (AOR = 3.54,95% CI:1.38,9.08) and antenatal care follow up (AOR = 2.24, 95% CI:1.18,4.25) had statistically significant association with cultural malpractices during labor and delivery. CONCLUSION: This study showed that cultural malpractices during childbirth were high in Awi, West, and East Gojjam Zones relative to the country's maternal health service utilization plan. Working on antenatal care follow-up and women and husband education in a culturally acceptable manner may reduce cultural malpractices during labor and delivery.

An exploration of patient-provider dynamics and childbirth experiences in rural and urban Peru: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Between 2006 and 2013, Peru implemented national programs which drastically decreased rates of maternal and neonatal mortality. However, since 2013, maternal and neonatal mortality in Peru have increased. Additionally, discrimination, abuse, and violence against women persists globally and impacts birthing experiences and mental health. This qualitative study sought to better understand the attitudes and beliefs regarding childbirth among women and providers in Southern Peru. This study also explores how these beliefs influence utilization of skilled care, patient-provider dynamics, and childbirth experiences and identifies factors that impact providers' provision of care. METHODS: Thirty semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 participants from rural Colca Canyon and 15 participants from urban Arequipa between April and May 2018. In each region, 10 women who had experienced recent births and five providers were interviewed. Provider participants predominantly identified as female and were mostly midwives. All interviews were conducted, transcribed, and coded in Spanish. A framework analysis was followed, and data were charted into two separate thematic frameworks using contextual and evaluative categories of conceptualization of childbirth. RESULTS: All recent births discussed were facility-based births. Four domains emerged: women's current birth experiences, provision of childbirth care, beliefs about childbirth among women and providers, and future health-seeking behavior. Findings suggest that women's feelings of helplessness and frustration were exacerbated by their unmet desire for respectful maternity care and patient advocacy or companionship. Providers attributed strain to perceived patient characteristics and insufficient support, including resources and staff. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest current childbirth experiences placed strain on the patient-provider dynamic and influenced women's attitudes and beliefs about future experiences. Currently, the technical quality of safe childbirth is the main driver of skilled birth attendance and facility-based births for women regardless of negative experiences. However, lack of respectful maternity care has been shown to have major long-term implications for women and subsequently, their children. This is one of the first studies to describe the nuances of patient-provider relationships and women's childbirth experiences in rural and urban Peru.

Questionnaire-based vs universal PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 in women admitted for delivery.

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that women admitted for delivery should have universal PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2. Yet, the considerable difference in the incidence of COVID-19 between different geographic regions may affect screening strategies. Therefore, we aimed to compare questionnaire-based testing versus universal PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 in women admitted for delivery. METHODS: A prospective cohort study of women admitted for delivery at a single center during a four-week period (April 22-May 25, 2020). All women completed a questionnaire about COVID-19 signs, symptoms, or risk factors, and a nasopharyngeal swab for PCR for SARS-CoV-2. Women who were flagged as suspected COVID-19 by the questionnaire (questionnaire-positive) were compared with women who were not flagged by the questionnaire (questionnaire-negative). RESULTS: Overall, 446 women were eligible for analysis, of which 54 (12.1%) were questionnaire-positive. PCR swab detected SARS-CoV-2 in four (0.9%) women: 3 of 392 (0.8%) in the questionnaire-negative group, and 1 of 54 (1.9%) in the questionnaire-positive group (P = .43), yielding a number needed to screen of 92 (95% CI 62-177). In 96% of the cases, the PCR results were obtained only in the postpartum period. No positive PCR results were obtained from neonatal testing for SARS-CoV-2. The sensitivity of the questionnaire was 75.0%, and the negative predictive value was 99.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Although the rate of positive PCR results was not significantly different between the groups, the number needed to screen is considerably high. The use of questionnaire-based PCR testing in areas with low incidence of COVID-19 allows for a reasonable allocation of resources and is easy to implement.

Rapid Cycle Implementation and Retrospective Evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 Checklist in Labor and Delivery.

BACKGROUND: Preparedness efforts for a COVID-19 outbreak required redesign and implementation of a perioperative workflow for the management of obstetric patients. In this report we describe factors which influenced rapid cycle implementation of a novel comprehensive checklist for the perioperative care of the COVID-19 parturient. METHODS: Within our labour and delivery unit, implementation of a novel checklist for the COVID-19 parturient requiring perioperative care was accomplished through rapid cycling, debriefing and on-site walkthroughs. Post-implementation, consistent use of the checklist was reported for all obstetric COVID-19 perioperative cases (100% workflow checklist utilization). Retrospective analysis of the factors influencing implementation was performed using a group deliberation approach, mapped against the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). RESULTS: Analysis of factors influencing implementation using CFIR revealed domains of process implementation and innovation characteristics as overwhelming facilitators for success. Constructs within the outer setting, inner setting, and characteristic of individuals (external pressures, baseline culture, and personal attributes) were perceived to act as early barriers. Constructs such as communication culture and learning climate, shifted in influence over time. CONCLUSION: We describe the influential factors of implementing a novel comprehensive obstetric workflow for care of the COVID-19 perioperative parturient during the first surge of the pandemic using the CFIR framework. Early workflow adoption was facilitated primarily by two domains, namely thoughtful innovation design and careful implementation planning in the setting of a long-standing culture of improvement. Factors initially assessed as barriers such as communication, culture and learning climate, transitioned into facilitators once a perceived benefit was experienced by healthcare teams. These results provide important information for the implementation of rapid change during a time of crisis.

Managing the tension between caring and charting: Labor and delivery nurses' experiences of the electronic health record.

Over a decade following the nationwide push to implement electronic health records (EHRs), the focus has shifted to addressing the cognitive burden associated with their use. Most research and discourse about the EHR's impact on clinicians' cognitive work has focused on physicians rather than on nursing-specific issues. Labor and delivery nurses may encounter unique challenges when using EHRs because they also interact with an electronic fetal monitoring system, continuously managing and synthesizing both maternal and fetal data. This grounded theory study explored labor and delivery nurses' perceptions of the EHR's impact on their cognitive work. Data were individual interviews and participant observations with twenty-one nurses from two labor and delivery units in the western U.S. and were analyzed using dimensional analysis. Nurses managed the tension between caring and charting using various strategies to integrate the EHR into their dynamic, high-acuity, specialty practice environment while using EHRs that were not designed for perinatal patients. Use of the EHR and associated technologies disrupted nurses' ability to locate and synthesize information, maintain an overview of the patient's status, and connect with patients and families. Individual-, group-, and environmental-level factors facilitated or constrained nurses' integration of the EHR. These findings represent critical safety failures requiring comprehensive changes to EHR designs and better processes for responding to end-user experiences. More research is needed to develop EHRs that support the dynamic and relationship-based nature of nurses' work and to align with specialty practice environments.

Theory analysis of social justice in nursing: Applications to obstetric violence research.

The dual purpose of this article is to present a formal theory analysis combined with recommendations for the use of social justice in nursing as a framework for the study of obstetric violence in US hospitals. A theory analysis of emancipatory nursing praxis as a middle-range theory of social justice in nursing was conducted using the strategy by Walker and Avant. The theory of social justice in nursing was determined to be logical, useful, and generalizable. The soundness and usability of the theory support the recommendations made for it to be applied to the study of obstetric violence, plus quality and outcome problems in maternity care that have been resistant to sustained progress and may benefit from a new paradigm for continued study. The alignment for obstetric violence to be studied with a social justice framework is linked to the theory's origins in critical social theory and the evolving concept of obstetric violence as a sex-specific form of violence against women that is a violation of human rights. The postmodern expansion of the body of work based on critical theory provides examples from emancipatory and feminist researchers for recognizing how the study of obstetric violence is compatible with a theoretical framework for social justice in nursing. The suitability of this framework to guide the further research needed to better understand, identify, and minimize harms from the occurrence of obstetric violence is argued. In addition, "The Code" for the American Nurses Association (ANA) is cited as a professional reference that outlines nurses' responsibilities for practice based on ethics, human rights, and social justice that are antithetical to the occurrence of obstetric violence.

Mother's satisfaction with the existing labor and delivery care services at public health facilities in West Shewa zone, Oromia region, Ethiopia.

BACKGROUND: Mothers' satisfaction with care during childbirth is indicators of the quality care which affects skilled birth attendance. Negative client's experiences at health facilities cause them to delay or avoid seeking care, which highlights services providers should consider and act on the expectations and experiences of women and their families. Though there are few studies conducted in Ethiopia on maternal satisfaction with Labor and Delivery (LAD) services, there is no study conducted in the study area. Therefore the study aims to assess the mother's satisfaction with existing LAD services and associated factors at all levels of health care in the West Shewa zone. METHODS: An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted at public health facilities in West Shewa zone, Central Ethiopia. A systematic sampling technique was used to select 560 respondents by using their delivery registration number and data were collected through face to face interview. Mothers were considered satisfied if they responded satisfied/very satisfied with 75% or more of the questions assessing satisfaction. Binary and multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify associated factors. RESULTS: The overall proportion of mothers who were satisfied with the current LAD care services were 60.8%. The main areas of dissatisfaction were; accessibility and cleanness of toilets/shower 72.6%, overall cleanness of the facility/including waiting-area 40.1% and presence of support a person during birth 38.0%. The presence of cultural practices (AOR = 2.5), discussion on the place of delivery with health worker during ANC (AOR = 1.75), providers asks for consent before procedure (AOR = 2.77), encouraging companion to remain with mother (AOR = 2.22), never leave mother alone or unattended (AOR = 2.56), giving periodic updates on status and progress of labor (AOR = 2.04) and explaining what is being done and to expect during LAD (AOR = 2.20) were factors identified to be significantly associated with satisfaction on LAD services. CONCLUSION: The overall satisfaction of mothers with LAD services at public health facilities in the West-Shewa zone was relatively low. Presence of cultural practices, discussion on the place of delivery, asking for consent before the procedure, encouraging companion to remain with mothers and explaining what is being done were factors identified. Therefore, all stakeholders have to emphatically work on those identified factors to improve mothers' satisfaction with LAD services.

The association between novel glucose indices in parturients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and clinically significant neonatal hypoglycemia.

The aim of this study was to determine the association between glucose control indices of parturient with type 1 diabetes (T1DM), treated with an insulin pump and utilizing continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), and clinically significant neonatal hypoglycemia. This was a retrospective cohort study which included 37 pregnant women with T1DM. All women were followed at a single tertiary center and had available CGM data. The association between maternal glucose indices before delivery and the risk for neonatal hypoglycemia requiring IV glucose (clinically significant hypoglycemia) was assessed using logistic regression. Mothers to neonates that experienced clinically significant hypoglycemia had a higher glucose standard deviation (SD) before delivery than did mothers to neonates who did not (25.5 ± 13 mg/dL vs. 14.7 ± 6.7 mg/dl respectively; p = .008). This association persisted after adjustment for maternal age, maternal pregestational body mass index (BMI), gestational age at delivery, neonatal birth weight, large for gestational age (LGA) and gender. This study demonstrates an association between high maternal glucose standard deviation before delivery and the risk for clinically significant neonatal hypoglycemia. Larger studies are needed to confirm these results and further explore the role of intrapartum glucose variability in the prediction and prevention of significant neonatal hypoglycemia.

Evaluating the effect of care around labor and delivery practices on early neonatal mortality in the Global Network's Maternal and Newborn Health Registry.

BACKGROUND: Neonatal deaths in first 28-days of life represent 47% of all deaths under the age of five years globally and are a focus of the United Nation's (UN's) Sustainable Development Goals. Pregnant women are delivering in facilities but that does not indicate quality of care during delivery and the postpartum period. The World Health Organization's Essential Newborn Care (ENC) package reduces neonatal mortality, but lacks a simple and valid composite index that measures its effectiveness. METHODS: Data on 5 intra-partum and 3 post-partum practices (indicators) recommended as part of ENC, routinely collected in NICHD's Global Network's (GN) Maternal Newborn Health Registry (MNHR) between 2010 and 2013, were included. We evaluated if all 8 practices (Care around Delivery - CAD), combined as an index was associated with reduced early neonatal mortality rates (days 0-6 of life). RESULTS: A total of 150,848 live births were included in the analysis. The individual indicators varied across sites. All components were present in 19.9% births (range 0.4 to 31% across sites). Present indicators (8 components) were associated with reduced early neonatal mortality [adjusted RR (95% CI):0.81 (0.77, 0.85); p < 0.0001]. Despite an overall association between CAD and early neonatal mortality (RR < 1.0 for all early mortality): delivery by skilled birth attendant; presence of fetal heart and delayed bathing were associated with increased early neonatal mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Present indicators (8 practices) of CAD were associated with a 19% reduction in the risk of neonatal death in the diverse health facilities where delivery occurred within the GN MNHR. These indicators could be monitored to identify facilities that need to improve compliance with ENC practices to reduce preventable neonatal deaths. Three of the 8 indicators were associated with increased neonatal mortality, due to baby being sick at birth. Although promising, this composite index needs refinement before use to monitor facility-based quality of care in association with early neonatal mortality. Trial registration The identifier of the Maternal Newborn Health Registry at ClinicalTrials.gov is NCT01073475.

Secondary Traumatic Stress in Maternal-Newborn Nurses: Secondary Qualitative Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Secondary traumatic stress can be the cost for clinicians when caring for persons who have been traumatized. Secondary traumatic stress is a syndrome of symptoms similar to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). AIMS: To conduct a secondary qualitative data analysis of three primary data sets of secondary traumatic stress in nurses. METHODS: Cross validation was the type of qualitative secondary analysis used to compare qualitative findings across these multiple data sets. In the three primary studies, the data were analyzed for themes. In this secondary qualitative analysis, a different defining unit was chosen. This time, the four categories of PTSD symptoms (intrusions, avoidance, arousal, and negative alterations in cognitions and mood) were used to analyze the data sets using content analysis. RESULTS: For all three groups of maternal-newborn nurses, the intrusions category was ranked first and the negative cognitions and mood category was ranked second. The remaining two symptom categories were where their rankings differed. The labor and delivery and neonatal intensive care unit nurses ranked arousal symptoms third and avoidance symptoms fourth. For the nurse-midwives, the rankings for these two categories were reversed. The neonatal intensive care unit nurses comprised the one group that did not report any avoidance symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: This secondary qualitative analysis confirmed the presence of PTSD symptoms that maternal-newborn nurses struggled with as a result of caring for either critically ill infants or women during traumatic births. Hospital preventive strategies and interventions for secondary traumatic stress in nurses are discussed.