Is endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy better than surgical gastrojejunostomy or duodenal stenting?

OBJECTIVES: Gastrojejunostomy is a critical procedure for managing gastric outlet obstruction. While surgical gastrojejunostomy has traditionally been the standard approach, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided gastroenterostomy has emerged as a promising endoscopic alternative. This comprehensive review aims to explore the development, techniques, outcomes, and comparative effectiveness of EUS-guided gastroenterostomy in comparison to duodenal stenting and surgical gastrojejunostomy. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using electronic databases to identify relevant studies published up to April 2024. The search included keywords related to EUS-guided gastrojejunostomy, surgical gastrojejunostomy, and duodenal stenting. Studies reporting on technical success, clinical success, complications, recurrence rates, quality of life, and long-term outcomes were included for analysis. RESULTS: The development of EUS-guided gastroenterostomy has evolved significantly over the years, driven by device advancements and improved endoscopic techniques. Comparative studies have shown that the technique offers several advantages, including the ability to create an anastomosis without the need for surgery, reduced invasiveness, shorter hospital stays, and potentially improved patient outcomes as compared to duodenal stenting and surgical gastrojejunostomy. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy represents a promising alternative to surgical gastrojejunostomy and duodenal stenting for the management of gastric outlet obstruction. The technique has evolved significantly, offering a less invasive and more effective treatment option.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided balloon-occluded gastrojejunostomy bypass, duodenal stent or laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy for unresectable malignant gastric outlet obstruction.

OBJECTIVES: Malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) can be relieved by either laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy (LGJ), endoscopic stenting (SEMS) or endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastrojejunostomy (endoscopic ultrasound-guided balloon-occluded gastrojejunostomy bypass; EPASS). This study aimed to compare the outcomes of the three treatment methods. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients who suffered from malignant GOO between January 2012 to November 2020 that received either EPASS, LGJ or SEMS. The outcomes included the technical and clinical success, 30-day adverse events and mortality, pre and post stenting GOO scores (GOOSs), stent patency and causes of stent dysfunction. RESULTS: One hundred and fourteen patients were included (30 EPASS, 35 LGJ, 49 SEMS). The technical success of EPASS, LGJ and SEMS were 93.3%, 100%, 100% (P = 0.058) and clinical success rates were 93.3%, 80%, 87.8% (P = 0.276), respectively. Procedural time was longest for the LGJ group (P < 0.001). The EPASS group had the shortest hospital stay (EPASS 1.5 [1-17], LGJ 7 [2-44], SEMS 5 [2-46] days, P < 0.001). EPASS group also had the lowest rates of recurrent obstruction (EPASS 3.3%, LGJ 17.1%, SEMS 36.7%, P = 0.002) and re-intervention (EPASS 3.3%, LGJ 17.1%, SEMS 26.5%, P = 0.031). The 1-month GOOS was highest in the EPASS group (EPASS 3 [1-3], LGJ 3 [0-3], SEMS 2 [0-3], P = 0.028). CONCLUSION: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastrojejunostomy was associated with better clinical outcomes then the other two procedures. The procedure may be the best option provided that the expertise is available.

Laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy for superior mesenteric artery syndrome in a patient with Parkinson's disease.

INTRODUCTION: Superior mesenteric artery syndrome is rare cause of intestinal obstruction. We report an unusual case of a patient with Parkinson's disease who developed superior mesenteric artery syndrome and discuss her management including laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy and Roux-en-Y anastomosis. CASE PRESENTATION: A 78-year-old patient with advanced Parkinson's disease presented with significant malnutrition, vomiting and post-prandial abdominal pain. Computed tomography confirmed duodenal compression by the superior mesenteric artery. We hypothesised this was likely triggered by extreme weight loss associated with advanced Parkinson's disease. As the patient failed to improve with conservative measures, laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy and Roux-en-Y anastomosis was successfully performed without complications and the patient discharged on day 7. CONCLUSION: Successful treatment was achieved due to early recognition of the consequences of chronic illness and addressing malnutrition. From this experience, we propose that laparoscopic gastric bypass is a safe and minimally invasive effective treatment option for superior mesenteric artery syndrome.

The Significance of Staging Laparoscopy in Detection of Radiologically Occult Peritoneal Carcinomatosis in Gastric Cancer With Gastric Outlet Obstruction: Consideration of The Optimal Treatment Approach.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Gastric cancer with gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is generally found at an advanced stage and with an unfavorable prognosis. This study was performed to examine the prevalence of radiologically occult peritoneal carcinomatosis in GOO and determine the optimal treatment strategy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This single-center study was a retrospective review of the clinical data of 186 patients with locally advanced gastric cancer at the distal stomach who underwent surgery from 2008 to 2016. These patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of GOO due to cancer progression: With GOO (n=71) and without GOO (n=115). RESULTS: The incidence of peritoneal carcinomatosis [with macroscopic peritoneal deposits (P1)/positive peritoneal cytology (CY1)] detected at laparotomy/laparoscopy was significantly higher in the group with GOO than in the group without (32.4% vs. 9.6%, p<0.01). The R0 resection rate was lower in the group with GOO (62.0% vs. 87.0%, p<0.01). The 5-year overall survival rate was also lower in the group with GOO (43.9% vs. 68.5%, p<0.01). However, in the subset of patients who underwent R0 surgery, the 5-year rates were similar for the two groups (67.4% vs. 73.1%, p=0.91). The multivariable analysis showed that a type 3 tumor appearance (odds ratio=3.66) and presence of GOO (odds ratio=2.87) were predictors of peritoneal carcinomatosis. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of radiologically occult peritoneal carcinomatosis in gastric cancer with GOO exceeded 30%. Staging laparoscopy (gastrojejunal bypass, if needed) should be performed to determine the optimal treatment plan.

Laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy with laparoscopic-assisted percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy for superior mesenteric artery syndrome with dysphagia: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Superior mesenteric artery (SMA) syndrome denotes a mechanical duodenal obstruction between the SMA and aorta. Total parenteral or enteral nutrition is the treatment of choice. However, surgical intervention is indicated if the patient's condition does not improve with conservative treatment. Here, we describe a case of SMA syndrome with dysphagia treated by laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy with laparoscopic-assisted percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. CASE PRESENTATION: A 64-year-old man was admitted to another hospital because of appetite loss and vomiting. There, he was diagnosed as having superior mesenteric artery (SMA) syndrome after appropriate investigation. He had had a cerebral infarction at age 57 years, since which he had lived in social housing because of complications of that infarction. A nasogastric tube was inserted into the third portion of the duodenum beyond the constricted section. He was discharged 2 months after admission his condition having improved. He was subsequently referred to our hospital for gastrostomy because the nasogastric tube had been in place for a long time and his condition had not improved. Additionally, gastrostomy was needed as a route for enteral nutrition because he had dysphagia, which had persisted despite attempts at rehabilitation, restricting his food intake to small amounts. Computed tomography (CT) revealed compression of the third portion of the duodenum between the SMA and aorta. After obtaining informed consent, we planned an operative procedure. We performed laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy under general anesthesia, followed by laparoscopic-assisted percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. The operation time was 156 min and there was little blood loss. Contrast radiography on postoperative day 3 revealed no evidence of leakage or stenosis. Enteral nutrition via the gastrostomy was started. He was discharged from our hospital on the 27th postoperative day. The gastrostomy was well tolerated and there has been no evidence of recurrence of SMA syndrome during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Gastrostomy is often performed to provide a route for administering enteral nutrition in patients with dysphagia. Development of SMA syndrome in patients with dysphagia necessitates operative management of the obstruction. Here, we describe a case of SMA syndrome with dysphagia treated by laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy with laparoscopic-assisted percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Laparoscopic Gastrojejunostomy for Patients with Unresectable Gastric Cancer with Gastric Outlet Obstruction.

BACKGROUND: There have been no comparative studies of open gastrojejunostomy (OGJ) and laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy (LGJ) in gastric cancer (GC) patients with gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) to explore both short- and long-term outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and feasibility of short-term oral intake as well as the long-term oncological outcome of OGJ and LGJ. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 53 consecutive unresectable GC patients who underwent GJ for GOO in our institute. OGJ (n = 23) was performed between 2010 and 2012 and LGJ (n = 30) was performed between 2013 and 2015. RESULTS: We found a higher rate of postoperative delayed gastric emptying in the OGJ group than in the LGJ group (26.1 vs 0%; P = 0.004). OGJ had more unfavorable results regarding the median time to resumption of oral feeding (4 vs 2 days; P < 0.001). Palliative LGJ did not offer survival benefit over OGJ in patients with unresectable GC with GOO. CONCLUSION: LGJ is a useful and feasible alternative to OGJ regarding short-term outcomes.