RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Somatostatin analogs, molecular-targeted agents and cytotoxic anticancer agents are available as therapeutic agents for the systemic treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, and we have developed a first-line treatment selection MAP to enable selection of the optimal treatment strategy for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. The purpose of this study was to validate the usefulness of the treatment selection MAP. METHODS: Patients who had received systemic therapy for a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor between January 2017 and December 2020 were compared according to whether they had been treated as recommended by the MAP (matched patients) or not (unmatched patients) to determine whether better outcomes were achieved by the matched patients. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival of the matched group and unmatched groups in the somatostatin analog, molecular-targeted agent and cytotoxic anticancer agents areas of the MAP. RESULTS: There were 41 (55%) MAP-matched patients in all areas among the 74 patients registered at seven hospitals. The MAP-matched rates were 100, 77 and 38% in the somatostatin analog area, molecular-targeted agent area and cytotoxic anticancer agents area, respectively. All of the unmatched patients had been selected for less intensive treatment. The median progression-free survival in the matched group and unmatched group in the molecular-targeted agent area of the MAP were 46.6 and 15.4 months, respectively, and a multivariate analysis identified MAP-matched (hazard ratio 0.18 [95% confidence interval: 0.04-0.87], P = 0.032) as the only significant independent favorable predictive factor. CONCLUSION: The usefulness of the MAP for treatment selection was validated in the molecular-targeted agent area of the MAP.
Asunto(s)
Tumores Neuroendocrinos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Femenino , Masculino , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/tratamiento farmacológico , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Adulto , Somatostatina/análogos & derivados , Somatostatina/uso terapéutico , Selección de Paciente , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Terapia Molecular Dirigida/métodos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
AIM: There is insufficient evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of molecular targeted agents (MTAs) for elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), who are likely to be vulnerable to adverse events (AEs) of therapy. The aim of this study was to compare sorafenib and lenvatinib use in elderly patients with HCC from the viewpoint of overall survival (OS) and rate of AE-induced MTA discontinuation. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with HCC over 80 years old who received first-line molecular targeted therapy (MTT) at four hospitals between June 2009 and September 2019. They were divided into three groups according to the era and type of first-line MTA: E1-Sora (sorafenib, between 2009 and 2016), E2-Sora (sorafenib, between 2017 and 2019), and E2-Len (lenvatinib, between 2017 and 2019). RESULTS: The study included 173 patients (E1-Sora, n = 79; E2-Sora, n = 50; E2-Len, n = 44) with a median age of 81.9 years (range, 80-93 years). Median OS was 15.1 months in the entire cohort (E1-Sora, 12.7 months; E2-Sora, 20.5 months; E2-Len, 10.3 months). The rate of treatment discontinuation due to AEs was high in the entire cohort, especially in E1-Sora and E2-Len (49.4% in E1-Sora, 28.0% in E2-Sora, and 54.6% in E2-Len, p = 0.0753). More E2-Sora patients received subsequent MTT than E2-Len patients (E2-Sora, 50%; E2-Len, 28.6%; p = 0.0111). CONCLUSION: Both sorafenib and lenvatinib were effective and feasible for elderly patients with HCC. In terms of discontinuation due to AEs and subsequent MTT, sorafenib might be more desirable for elderly patients with HCC over 80 years.
RESUMEN
Background & Aims: Intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment has become complicated due to the development of various molecular-targeted agents (MTAs). We aimed to determine whether the administration of MTAs in patients with intermediate-stage HCC contributed to the prevention of progression to an advanced stage. METHODS: We enrolled and retrospectively examined 289 patients with Child-Pugh class A who had been diagnosed with intermediate-stage HCC and underwent initial trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE). Patients were classified into 2 groups: a group in which MTAs were administered to patients whose condition was refractory to TACE (n = 65) and a group in which MTAs were not administered (n = 65) at intermediate-stage HCC after propensity score matching (PSM). Time to stage progression (TTSP) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and analyzed using a log-rank test after PSM. RESULTS: TTSP and OS of the group with MTA administration were significantly longer than those of the group without MTA administration (TTSP: 36.4 vs. 17.9 months, p < 0.001; median survival time [MST]: 44.6 vs. 26.6 months, p = 0.001). Within the up-to-seven criteria and administration of MTAs at the intermediate-stage HCC were identified as independent factors for TTSP and OS in the multivariate analysis. TTSP and OS in the era of the multi-MTA group were significantly longer than those in the era of the mono-MTA group (TTSP: 44.8 vs. 27.4 months, p = 0.01; MST: 53.4 vs. 33.3 months, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: The administration of MTAs in patients with intermediate-stage HCC contributes to the prevention of stage progression and prolongs OS.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Quimioembolización Terapéutica/métodos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Compuestos de Fenilurea/administración & dosificación , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Sorafenib/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The clinical outcome of ramucirumab in multi-molecular targeted agent (MTA) sequential therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC) was assessed in comparison with that of prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. METHODS: Sixteen patients who received ramucirumab as part of multi-MTA sequential therapy for u-HCC were enrolled in a retrospective, cohort study. Ramucirumab was started as 2nd line in 7 patients, 3rd line in 5 patients, and 4th line in 4 patients. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 6.3%, the disease control rate (DCR) was 50.0%, median progression-free survival was 2.0 months (evaluated by mRECIST), median overall survival (OS) with ramucirumab was 7.9 months, and the median OS from 1st-line therapy was 28.1 months. One month after the start of ramucirumab, α-fetoprotein (AFP) decreased in 6 of 12 cases (50.0%), and the DCR in AFP-decreased cases was 83.3%. The DCR of ramucirumab was 66.7% in cases in which disease control was obtained by prior TKI therapy, whereas it was 0.0% in the cases in which disease control was not obtained by prior TKI therapy. Examining the adverse events, no new safety concerns were confirmed. CONCLUSION: The AFP response to ramucirumab and the treatment response to prior TKI therapy are associated with treatment response to ramucirumab.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Compuestos de Fenilurea/administración & dosificación , Pronóstico , Piridinas/administración & dosificación , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sorafenib/administración & dosificación , Tasa de Supervivencia , RamucirumabRESUMEN
The addition of molecular targeted agents (MTAs) to R-CHOP has been one of the main focuses of research in patients with DLBCL. Despite encouraging preliminary results, recent randomized controlled trials (RCT) have not shown a definitive benefit over standard R-CHOP. Here we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the impact of this strategy. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify RCT that evaluated the addition of MTA to R-CHOP-based regimen versus R-CHOP alone in previously untreated DLBCL patients. Fixed and random effects models were used to estimate pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and adverse events (AE) were analyzed. A total of seven RCT including 3,255 patients with DLBCL met the eligibility criteria. Three different types of MTAs (bortezomib, ibrutinib, and lenalidomide) were investigated in combination with R-CHOP. Overall, R-CHOP plus MTA showed a slightly better PFS (HR=0.86; 95% CI: 0.76-0.98). No differences were observed according to the cell of origin subtype of DLBCL. Interestingly, patients younger than 60 years had a significantly better PFS with R-CHOP plus MTAs (HR=0.72; 95% CI: 0.56-0.93), while no benefit was observed in patients older than 60 years (HR=0.96). The combination strategy showed higher odds to develop serious AEs (OR= 1.46, 95% CI 1.11-1.91). R-CHOP plus MTA seems only to slightly improve PFS in patients with DLBCL, particularly in younger patients. An increase in toxicity was observed in comparison to R-CHOP.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/tratamiento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Ciclofosfamida/efectos adversos , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapéutico , Doxorrubicina/efectos adversos , Doxorrubicina/uso terapéutico , Descubrimiento de Drogas , Humanos , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Prednisona/efectos adversos , Prednisona/uso terapéutico , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Rituximab/efectos adversos , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vincristina/efectos adversos , Vincristina/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
AIM: Regorafenib is a second-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma after sorafenib-refractory treatment. This study examined the effects of regorafenib administration on hepatic functional reserve and the treatment course after regorafenib discontinuation. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter study involved 51 patients treated with regorafenib after sorafenib-refractory treatment for u-HCC at seven institutions before March 2021. RESULTS: Fourteen, 13, and 24 patients were classified based on modified albumin-bilirubin (mALBI) grade 1, 2a, and 2b, respectively. The median survival time and progression-free survival were 16.7 and 3.3 months, respectively. Only mALBI grade 2b or 3 was significantly associated with survival rate (hazard ratio, 2.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-4.49; p = 0.047). A comparison of median ALBI scores at the initiation of regorafenib (-2.35) with those at 4 weeks (-1.93) revealed a significant relative change (p = 0.0001). After 4 weeks, grade 1 or 2a persisted in 15 patients (Group 1); grade 1 or 2a deteriorated to 2b in 12 patients (Group 2); grade 2b or 3 before regorafenib administration was present in 22 patients (Group 3); and MST was 33.3, 12.8, and 11.3 months in the three groups, respectively (p = 0.05). Patients treated with lenvatinib (LEN) (n = 27, MST = 23.4 months) after regorafenib had a significantly longer survival time from regorafenib initiation than those not treated with LEN (n = 24, 11.8 months; p = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic functional reserve significantly declined after regorafenib administration. During regorafenib treatment, favorable hepatic functional reserve before administration and maintenance of favorable hepatic reserve after administration lead to prolonged prognosis.
RESUMEN
AIM: The optimal choice between sorafenib (SOR) or lenvatinib (LEN) as the first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC) remains debatable. Using propensity score matching, this study compares the outcomes of SOR and LEN in the molecular-targeted agent (MTA) sequential treatment of u-HCC patients. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter, observational study recruited 137 u-HCC patients who underwent primary treatment with LEN (n = 52) or SOR (n = 85) between June 2017 and June 2020 after regorafenib was approved as the secondary treatment for u-HCC. Propensity score matching was used to reduce confounding, resulting in the selection of 104 patients (n = 52 for the SOR and LEN cohorts). RESULTS: The median overall survival was 21.8 months for LEN and 20.4 months for SOR. LEN exhibited significantly greater therapeutic efficacy as compared to SOR (objective response rate: 3.8% [SOR] vs. 42.3% [LEN], p < 0.01; progression-free survival: 10 months [LEN] vs. 5.1 months [SOR], p < 0.01). No significant intergroup differences were noted in the rate of transition to secondary MTA treatments (SOR: 58.7%; LEN: 48.4%), adverse events (SOR: 86%; LEN: 95%), and maintenance of the Child-Pugh (CP) score during treatment. Compared to non-MTA treatments, secondary MTA treatment achieved a greater improvement in survival (4.3 vs. 2.8 months, p = 0.0047). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the CP score (p < 0.01) and alpha-fetoprotein level (p < 0.01) were independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Both SOR and LEN treatments showed a clinically comparable therapeutic efficacy as the first-line treatments for u-HCC patients in an MTA sequential therapy.
RESUMEN
Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) constitute a heterogeneous group of tumors. In this review, we summarize the results of various clinical trials that have been conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of various therapeutic options for NENs. Based on the encouraging results obtained from these trials, various therapeutic options have been established for the treatment of NENs, including somatostatin analogs (SSAs), molecularly targeted drugs and cytotoxic agents. In addition, peptide receptor radionucleotide therapy has recently been evaluated for the treatment of various NENs. We also discuss the approach for selecting the appropriate drugs and sequence of treatment with the various drug classes, as recommended by different treatment guidelines. Finally, we discuss the scope for future research in this field, especially into the merits of combination therapy with molecularly targeted drugs plus SSAs, along with ongoing studies.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Gastrointestinales , Tumores Neuroendocrinos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Terapia Combinada , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Neoplasias Intestinales/tratamiento farmacológico , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Somatostatina , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
It has been 20 years since the clinical introduction of rituximab, a monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody. Rituximab combination chemotherapy has substantially improved the prognosis of nearly all B-cell malignancies. Twenty years following the clinical introduction of rituximab, the era of molecular targeted agents and development of novel molecular targeted agents, including monoclonal antibody based on the molecular pathology, has been promoted. In recent years, CAR-T therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors have been introduced in the clinical practice of malignant lymphoma. On the other hand, there are many histopathological subtypes that cannot directly receive the benefits of immunotherapy, and sufficient improvement in the prognosis of these subtypes is not seen. Therefore, further elucidation of molecular pathology and development of novel molecular targeted agents are crucial for the improvement of their prognosis. In this review, molecular targeted agents introduced into clinical practice in recent years, which revolutionized the treatment of malignant lymphoma, and molecular targeted agents expected to be introduced in clinical practice in the near future are discussed.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Linfoma , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Linfoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Rituximab/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although a strong antitumor effect of lenvatinib (LEN) has been noted for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), there are still no reports on the prognosis for patients with disease progression after first-line LEN therapy. METHODS: Patients (n = 141) with unresectable HCC, Child-Pugh class A liver function, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) of 0 or 1 who were treated with LEN from March 2018 to December 2019 were enrolled. RESULTS: One hundred and five patients were treated with LEN as first-line therapy, 53 of whom had progressive disease (PD) at the radiological evaluation. Among the 53 patients with PD, there were 27 candidates for second-line therapy, who had Child-Pugh class A liver function and an ECOG-PS of 0 or 1 at progression. After progression on first-line LEN, 28 patients were treated with a molecular targeted agent (MTA) as second-line therapy (sorafenib: n = 26; ramucirumab: n = 2). Multivariate analysis identified modified albumin-bilirubin grade 1 or 2a at LEN initiation (odds ratio 5.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.465-18.31, p = 0.011) as a significant and independent factor for candidates. The median post-progression survival after PD on first-line LEN was 8.3 months. Cox hazard multivariate analysis showed that a low alpha-fetoprotein level (<400 ng/mL; hazard ratio [HR] 0.297, 95% CI 0.099-0.886, p = 0.003), a relative tumor volume <50% at the time of progression (HR 0.204, 95% CI 0.07-0.592, p = 0.03), and switching to MTAs as second-line treatment after LEN (HR 0.299, 95% CI 0.12-0.746, p = 0.01) were significant prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: Among patients with PD on first-line LEN, good liver function at introduction of LEN was an important and favorable factor related to eligibility for second-line therapy. In addition, post-progression treatment with MTAs could improve the prognosis for patients who had been treated with first-line LEN.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Compuestos de Fenilurea/uso terapéutico , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Estudios de Cohortes , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sorafenib/uso terapéutico , Tasa de Supervivencia , RamucirumabRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: A number of therapeutic agents have been reported to be clinically useful for the management of the patients with unresectable pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) including somatostatin analogues, molecular-targeted agents and cytotoxic agents. However, the optimal strategy for selection among those treatment modalities above in these patients has remained unexplored. METHODS: Japanese experts for PanNET discussed and determined the optimal treatment strategies according to the results of previously reported studies. RESULTS: The tumor volume of liver metastases and the Ki-67 labeling index were unanimously accepted as indicators of the tumor burden and tumor aggressiveness, respectively, which are two most clinically pivotal factors for determining the strategy of systemic treatment for unresectable PanNETs. In addition, for those with a relatively small tumor burden and slow disease progression, somatostatin analogues were selected as the first-line treatment agents. For those with a relatively large tumor burden and rapid tumor progression, cytotoxic agents were selected, possibly aiming at tumor shrinkage. For those of intermediate tumor volume and/or growth rate, molecular-targeted agents were selected as the first choice. Based on this strategy discussed among the experts, we tentatively prepared a MAP for proposing optimal treatment strategy and examined its validity in some patients with unresectable PanNETs. Results validated the usefulness of this MAP proposed for patients harbouring unresectable PanNETs. CONCLUSION: We herein propose a tentative MAP for optimal treatment selection for the patients harbouring unresectable PanNETs. Further large scale studies are, however, warranted to validate the usefulness of this MAP proposed in this study.
Asunto(s)
Tumores Neuroendocrinos/terapia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/uso terapéutico , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Japón , Antígeno Ki-67 , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Somatostatina/análogos & derivados , Somatostatina/uso terapéutico , Análisis de Supervivencia , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Carga TumoralRESUMEN
Chemotherapy is one of the most important treatment modalities for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). On the basis of the results of two pivotal Phase III placebo-controlled studies, sorafenib is currently acknowledged worldwide as the standard therapeutic agent for advanced HCC. Following the introduction of sorafenib for the treatment of HCC, Phase III trials of numerous other agents as first-line or second-line chemotherapy have been conducted to determine if any of these agents might offer superior survival benefit to sorafenib. In 2016, a clear survival benefit of regorafenib over placebo was demonstrated in HCC patients showing disease progression after sorafenib treatment. A year later, in 2017, lenvatinib has been shown to be non-inferior to sorafenib, in terms of the overall survival, in chemo-naïve patients with advanced HCC. More recently, promising outcomes have also been reported with new agents, such as nivolumab and cabozantinib. At present, various novel combination regimens including these agents are currently under development. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is frequently adopted for the treatment of locally advanced HCC in Japan, based on reports of high response rates and favorable long-term outcomes. Although some randomized controlled trials of HAIC plus sorafenib vs. sorafenib alone as first-line therapy have been conducted in patients with advanced HCC, no firm evidence of the superiority of one over the other has been established yet. In the future, demonstration of the survival advantage of HAIC and the recognition of HAIC as one of the standard treatments for patients with advanced HCC are expected.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Animales , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Humanos , Inmunoterapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The multikinase inhibitor sorafenib is the first oral molecular targeted agent with proven prognostic benefit in unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, as with other drugs, sorafenib has its limitations, and various clinical trials have been conducted to develop novel molecular targeted agents for use alone or in combination with existing locoregional therapies. Despite this, clinical trials of molecular targeted agents combined with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) have not reported major treatment outcomes to date. In this review, we describe previous clinical trials of combination therapy with TACE and a molecular targeted agent in patients with unresectable HCC.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Quimioembolización Terapéutica/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Niacinamida/administración & dosificación , Niacinamida/análogos & derivados , Compuestos de Fenilurea/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/administración & dosificación , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , SorafenibRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cardiac metastasis from colorectal cancer is rare. There is little evidence supporting the effectiveness of chemotherapy, and standard therapy for metastatic cardiac tumors has not been established. CASE PRESENTATION: A 76-year-old woman presented with a right ventricle tumor that was detected incidentally on screening cardiac ultrasonography. The initial computed tomography (CT) scan showed the cardiac tumor, which was approximately 40 mm in size, and multiple pulmonary nodules. Serum levels of tumor markers CEA and CA19-9 were elevated aberrantly. The suspected primary tumor, a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma of the transverse colon with wild-type KRAS was found by colonoscopy, and treatment with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (modified FOLFOX6) plus panitumumab was initiated. After 4 courses of the therapy, a CT scan showed that the cardiac tumor size had markedly decreased and the pulmonary nodules had diminished. The serum levels of CEA and CA19-9 were also markedly decreased. After 12 courses of chemotherapy during 10 months of treatment, the patient continued to show a partial response, and she remained asymptomatic with continuation of the treatment through 15 courses. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of the efficacy of combination therapy using cytotoxic and molecular targeted agents against cardiac metastasis from colon cancer.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Neoplasias Cardíacas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Cardíacas/secundario , Anciano , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Cardíacas/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Leucovorina/uso terapéutico , Compuestos Organoplatinos/uso terapéutico , Panitumumab , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC) is the multifocal seeding of cerebrospinal fluid and leptomeninges by malignant cells. The incidence of LMC is approximately 5% in patients with malignant tumors overall and the rate is increasing due to increasing survival time of cancer patients. Eradication of the disease is not yet possible, so the treatment goals of LMC are to improve neurologic symptoms and to prolong survival. A standard treatment for LMC has not been established due to low incidences of LMC, the rapidly progressing nature of the disease, heterogeneous populations with LMC, and a lack of randomized clinical trial results. Treatment options for LMC include intrathecal chemotherapy, systemic chemotherapy, and radiation therapy, but the prognoses remain poor with a median survival of <3 months. Recently, molecular targeted agents have been applied in the clinic and have shown groundbreaking results in specific patient groups epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted therapy or an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor in lung cancer, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-directed therapy in breast cancer, and CD20-targeted therapy in B cell lymphoma). Moreover, there are results indicating that the use of these agents under proper dose and administration routes can be effective for managing LMC. In this article, we review molecular targeted agents for managing LMC.
Asunto(s)
Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinomatosis Meníngea/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Molecular Dirigida/tendencias , Quinasa de Linfoma Anaplásico , Antígenos CD20/química , Antígenos CD20/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Receptores ErbB/antagonistas & inhibidores , Receptores ErbB/metabolismo , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/metabolismo , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Linfoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma/patología , Carcinomatosis Meníngea/mortalidad , Carcinomatosis Meníngea/patología , Metotrexato/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Tirosina Quinasas Receptoras/antagonistas & inhibidores , Proteínas Tirosina Quinasas Receptoras/metabolismo , Rituximab/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
The benefits and challenges of incorporating biomarkers into the development of anticancer agents have been increasingly discussed. In many cases, a sensitive subpopulation of patients is determined based on preclinical data and/or by retrospectively analyzing clinical trial data. Prospective exploration of sensitive subpopulations of patients may enable us to efficiently develop definitively effective treatments, resulting in accelerated drug development and a reduction in development costs. We consider the development of a new molecular-targeted treatment in cancer patients. Given preliminary but promising efficacy data observed in a phase I study, it may be worth designing a phase II clinical trial that aims to identify a sensitive subpopulation. In order to achieve this goal, we propose a Bayesian randomized phase II clinical trial design incorporating a biomarker that is measured on a graded scale. We compare two Bayesian methods, one based on subgroup analysis and the other on a regression model, to analyze a time-to-event endpoint such as progression-free survival (PFS) time. The two methods basically estimate Bayesian posterior probabilities of PFS hazard ratios in biomarker subgroups. Extensive simulation studies evaluate these methods' operating characteristics, including the correct identification probabilities of the desired subpopulation under a wide range of clinical scenarios. We also examine the impact of subgroup population proportions on the methods' operating characteristics. Although both methods' performance depends on the distribution of treatment effect and the population proportions across patient subgroups, the regression-based method shows more favorable operating characteristics.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto/métodos , Diseño de Investigaciones Epidemiológicas , Terapia Molecular Dirigida/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/métodos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/genética , Teorema de Bayes , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Simulación por Computador , Diseño de Fármacos , Femenino , Marcadores Genéticos , Humanos , Cadenas de Markov , Método de Montecarlo , Análisis de Regresión , Análisis de Supervivencia , TrastuzumabRESUMEN
Lenvatinib is a molecular-targeted agent with proven efficacy against hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We herein report a case of lenvatinib-associated Fournier gangrene. A 66-year-old man with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma presented with a high fever 4 weeks after switching to lenvatinib. He had severe erythema in the inguinal region, and abdominal computed tomography revealed extensive emphysema and scrotal abscesses. He was diagnosed with Fournier's gangrene, and his symptoms were successfully treated with local debridement and antimicrobial therapy. Although reports of lenvatinib-associated Fournier's gangrene are rare, they should be kept in mind, as the condition could progress rapidly and have poor outcomes.
RESUMEN
Systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has undergone substantial advancements. With the advent of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (ATZ/BEV) combination therapy, followed by durvalumab plus tremelimumab, the era of immunotherapy for HCC has commenced. The emergence of systemic treatment with high response rates has led to improvements in overall survival while enabling conversion to radical surgical resection in some patients with HCC. In patients with intermediate-stage HCC, new treatment strategies combining systemic treatment and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) are under development in clinical trials. Moreover, the addition of local therapies, such as TACE, to systemic treatment according to the treatment effect could achieve a certain percentage of complete response. In the IMbrave050 trial, the efficacy of ATZ/BEV combination therapy was validated in patients predicted to have a high risk of recurrence, especially in those who had undergone radical surgery or radiofrequency ablation for HCC. Therefore, systemic treatment for HCC is entering a new phase for all disease stages. The objective of this review is to organize the current position of systemic therapy for each HCC stage and discuss the development of new treatment methods and strategies, with a focus on regimens incorporating immune checkpoint inhibitors, along with future prospects.
RESUMEN
AIM: Indications of drug therapies to elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) should be carefully determined. The current study assessed the safety and efficacy of molecular targeted agents (MTAs) in the elderly patients with HCC, and identified factors associated with prognosis in a real-world clinical setting. METHODS: In a retrospective observational study, clinical data of patients with unresectable HCC treated with sorafenib or lenvatinib as first-line treatment at our hospital between 2011 and 2022, were investigated. Clinical parameters, therapeutic effects, adverse events (AEs), and prognosis were evaluated separately for the non-elderly (<75 years old) and elderly patients (≥75 years old). RESULTS: Overall, 111 patients were enrolled, including 59 non-elderly and 52 elderly patients. Compared to the non-elderly patients, the elderly patients had significantly lower skeletal muscle mass and a significantly lower percentage of patients in poor general condition with performance status 2 or higher, but there were no differences in parameters related to liver function or nutritional status. There were no significant differences in the incidence of severe AEs and therapeutic effects between the groups. No significant difference in progression-free survival was observed in the elderly and non-elderly patients; however, overall survival (OS) for sorafenib treatment was shorter in the elderly patients than in the non-elderly patients. Elderly patients consumed lower doses of both the drugs, and relative dose intensity (RDI) 4 weeks after treatment (4W-RDI) was associated with OS. Further, OS in the elderly patients was significantly longer in the subgroup with high 4W-RDI as compared to that in the subgroup with low 4W-RDI. CONCLUSIONS: MTAs can be safely administered to elderly patients with HCC. Furthermore, 4W-RDI is associated with longer OS. Maintaining RDI in the early phase is crucial in predicting the success of treatment with MTAs, especially in the elderly patients.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Sorafenib/uso terapéutico , Terapia Molecular Dirigida/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversosRESUMEN
A total of 137 HCC patients treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab from October 2020 to September 2022 were enrolled. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from the beginning of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab were 21.1 months (range, 18.8 months-not reached) and 10.5 months (range, 8.2-12.1 months), respectively. Fifty patients were diagnosed with progressive disease after atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. Of this group, 24 patients were administered lenvatinib, and the median OS and PFS from the beginning of lenvatinib were 15.3 months (range, 10.5 months-not reached) and 4.0 months (range, 2.5-6.4 months), respectively. The objective response rates based on the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECISTs) criteria version 1.1 and modified RECISTs were 33.3% and 54.2%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the median serum alpha-fetoprotein level between before and after lenvatinib. In the multivariate analysis, Child-Pugh class A (hazard ratio 0.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.02-0.76, p = 0.02) and intrahepatic tumor occupancy rate < 50% (hazard ratio < 0.01, 95% CI 0.003-0.35, p < 0.01) were the significant factors for OS. There were some frequent adverse events (AEs) in patients treated with lenvatinib such as hypertension, fatigue, anorexia, proteinuria, and so on, but none directly caused death. In conclusion, lenvatinib after atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for unresectable HCC should be considered an effective treatment option.