Prescribing Characteristics of Octreotide Immediate-Release and Long-Acting Release in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Treatment recommendations for patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) include the use of octreotide long-acting release (LAR) for long-term therapy and immediate-release (IR) as rescue therapy to control the breakthrough symptoms of carcinoid syndrome (CS). High doses of LAR are commonly used in clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate the real-world utilization of LAR and preceding IR use at the prescription and patient levels. METHODS: We used an administrative claims database (2009-2018) containing privately insured enrollees. We calculated the normalized LAR dose from pharmacy claims and the initial mean IR daily dose at the prescription level. At the patient level, we conducted a retrospective cohort study that included patients continuously enrolled with ≥1 pharmacy claim of LAR and evaluated the frequency and the clinical reason for dose escalation of LAR. The definition of the above-label maximum dose of LAR was ≥30 mg/4 weeks. RESULTS: Nineteen percent of LAR prescriptions had an above-label maximum dose. Only 7% of LAR prescriptions had preceding IR use. There were 386 patients with NETs or CS vs. 570 with an unknown diagnosis. Comparing patients with NETs or CS to those with an unknown diagnosis, 22.3% vs. 11.0 % experienced dose escalations and 29.0% vs. 26.6% had IR use before dose escalation, respectively. LAR dose escalation occurred in 50.9% vs. 39.2% for symptom control, 12.3% vs. 7.1% for tumor progression control, and 16.6% vs. 6.0% for both reasons in NETs/CS and unknown groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Octreotide LAR dosing above the label-maximum dose is common and IR rescue dosing appears to be underutilized.

The role of quantitative tumor burden based on [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-NOC PET/CT in well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors: beyond prognosis.

PURPOSE: We aimed to elucidate the role of quantitative tumor burden based on PET/CT of somatostatin receptors in well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). METHODS: This study enrolled patients with [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-NOC PET/CT-positive advanced NETs who did not receive medical treatment prior to PET/CT. Tumor burden was calculated using methods based on the background threshold and relative fixed threshold values (30%, 40%, and 50%). The prognostic value of the measured tumor burden in reference to overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) on treatment with octreotide long-acting repeatable (LAR) was assessed using Cox regression analysis, Harrell's C-index, and survival analysis. A classification and regression tree (CART) was used to determine the optimal threshold for tumor burden. RESULTS: A total of 204 patients were included. Somatostatin receptor-expressing tumor volume (SRETV) and liver SRETV derived from a relative fixed threshold of 30% (SRETV30 and liver SRETV30) were statistically significantly associated with OS (C-index: 0.802 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.658-0.946] and 0.806 [95% CI, 0.664-0.948], respectively). Extrahepatic tumor burden was not correlated with OS (hazard ratio: 0.617, 95% CI: 0.241-1.574, P = 0.312). Among 155 patients with non-functional NETs with a ki-67 index of ≤ 10%, those with a high SRETV30 (P = 0.016) or high liver SRETV30 (P = 0.014) showed statistically significantly worse PFS on treatment with octreotide LAR. Patients receiving a higher dose of octreotide LAR normalized by SRETV30 or liver SRETV30 (a normalized dose or a liver normalized dose) showed prolonged PFS on treatment with octreotide LAR and a prolonged OS. CONCLUSION: Quantitative tumor burden based on [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-NOC PET/CT was correlated with OS and PFS in patients with non-functional NETs with a ki-67 index of ≤ 10% who received octreotide LAR. Calculating normalized and liver normalized doses may help in selecting the starting dose of octreotide LAR.

Patterns of Care Among Real-World Patients with Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Although recent pivotal trials (PROMID, CLARINET) have established somatostatin analogs (SSAs) as first-line agents for neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), their use in clinical practice is largely unknown. We aimed to understand real-world management and treatment of gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) NETs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic GEP-NETs treated with SSAs, lanreotide depot or octreotide long-acting release (LAR), between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2015, were identified from a U.S. claims database supplemented with chart review for a subset of patients. Descriptive statistics summarized patients' demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and healthcare resource use. Univariate and multivariate comparisons were made across SSA groups. RESULTS: Among 548 patients treated with an SSA for metastatic GEP-NET (lanreotide = 108; octreotide = 440), demographic and clinical characteristics were similar across groups, except more patients with pancreatic NETs were treated with lanreotide (38.7% vs. 6.3%, p < .01). More octreotide patients had a diagnosis of carcinoid syndrome compared with lanreotide patients (19.8% vs. 11.1%, p = .02). Approximately 1.1% of patients received lanreotide (>120 mg every 4 weeks [Q4W]) at a dose above label compared with 12.7% of octreotide patients (>30 mg Q4W; p < .01). At 1.5 years after SSA initiation, 85.7% (95% confidence interval, 74.3%-92.3%) were still on index SSA as reported by the physician. Variances between chart review and claims data were significant. CONCLUSION: SSAs were common in first-line systemic intervention, but dose escalations and dosing deviations outside of label were noted. Variances between claims and chart review warrant additional research to compare methodologies. With an increasing focus on value-based care in oncology, it is critical to understand the use of, and outcomes with, these agents in community practices. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The aim of this study was to enhance understanding of real-world management and treatment of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), with particular focus on systemic therapy with a somatostatin analog (SSA). As per published guidelines, SSAs are common in first-line systemic intervention, but dose escalations and dosing deviations outside of the label are noted for symptom control. Nevertheless, oncologists must weigh the implications of the use of above-label dosing of SSAs to manage and treat patients with metastatic NET within a value-based care framework.

A Case of Acromegaly in which a Pituitary Gland Tumor was Reduced Significantly by Administering Octreotide Long Acting Release (LAR) and Could Be Removed Surgically.

A 54-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital for detailed examination of acromegaly because she noticed bilateral hand and finger swelling at the age of 43 and plantar thickening, facial changes and unclear articulation at the age of 49. She had prominent brow ridges, mandibular protrusion, and enlargement of the hands, feet, nasal wings, lips and tongue. Her growth hormone (GH) level was 39.8 ng/ml, insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) level was 717 ng/ml, GH level was not suppressed (22.9 ng/ml) during a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Radiography showed cauliflower-like enlargement of the distal phalanx of the fingers, thickening/enlargement of the plantar soft tissues, and increased antero-posterior diameter of the sella turcica. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a mass (21×17 mm) growing towards the right suprasellar region and invading the cavernous sinus. She was diagnosed with acromegaly based on the characteristic physical findings, GH excess, high IGF-1, lack of GH suppression during the 75-g OGTT, and the presence of a pituitary tumor. She was started on octreotide long acting release (Oct-LAR) 20 mg/4w for tumor shrinkage. After three doses, her GH and IGF-1 levels decreased to 2.19 ng/ml (1.69 during the 75-g OGTT) and 205 ng/ml, respectively, meeting cure criteria for acromegaly. In this case, a decrease in GH and IGF-1 levels, tumor shrinkage, and resolution of cavernous sinus invasion allowed the patient to undergo surgery with curative intent (the first-line treatment for acromegaly) without postoperative complications. Thus, preoperative Oct-LAR administration has the potential to improve treatment outcomes of acromegaly.

Octreotide LAR was useful for avoiding hypoglycemia in an elderly patient with insulinoma.

An 80-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital with a hypoglycemia attack. She was diagnosed with insulinoma based on her high insulin level at the time of the hypoglycemia attack and the presence of a hypervascular tumor in her pancreas. The patient refused surgical treatment and octreotide was used to prevent hypoglycemia.It is known that octreotide suppresses the secretion of insulin from the pancreas; however, insulin secretion is not always suppressed in patients with insulinoma. Moreover, there is no particular protocol for the use of octreotide in the treatment of insulinoma.We examined the effect of octreotide in preventing hypoglycemia using CGM. The injection of octreotide (50 µg) at 21: 00 prevented hypoglycemia during the night.However the patient could not perform self-injection due to the sequelae of a cerebral infarction. We therefore chose to have her eat an extra meal at 11 pm.After a while the patient became exhausted by eating meals at night. We examined the effects of octreotide LAR using CGM, and it was found to prevent hypoglycemia for 4 weeks. The patient's QOL was improved by being released from a restriction that affected her daily life.

Medical treatment of acromegaly - When the tumor size matters: A narrative review.

Medical treatment of acromegaly is generally positioned as a second line of treatment after pituitary adenoma surgery. With the rising availability and variety of medications for acromegaly increases our understanding of their effectiveness and safety. Volume of the published data on the impact of medical therapy on biochemical control of acromegaly, contrasts a relative lack of publications which comprehensively address pituitary tumor alterations under different drug modalities. Assessment of changes in GH-secreting adenoma volume is often overshadowed by clinicians' focus on GH and IGF-I levels during acromegaly treatment. Close analysis of studies published in the last two decades, reveals that both an increase and decrease in somatotropinoma volume are possible during treatment with any of available drugs for acromegaly. Changes in pituitary tumor size may arise from the biological nature of adenoma itself, independently of the administered medications. Therefore, an individual approach is necessary in the treatment of patients with acromegaly, based on repeated insight to their clinical, biochemical, pathological and imaging characteristics. In this review, we summarize and comment how pituitary tumor size is affected by the treatment with all currently available drugs in acromegaly: long-acting somatostatin receptor ligands of the first generation (octreotide LAR and lanreotide autogel) and the second generation (pasireotide-LAR), as well as pegvisomant (PEG) and cabergoline (CAB).

Prolonged progression-free survival achieved by octreotide LAR plus transarterial embolization in low-to-intermediate grade neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases with high hepatic tumor burden.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and outcome of transarterial embolization (TAE) plus octreotide long-acting repeatable (LAR) on patients with low-to-intermediate neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases (NETLM). METHODS: One hundred and sixteen patients with G1/G2 NETLM treated with TAE plus octreotide LAR at the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University between January 12, 2016 and September 24, 2020 were reviewed. Radiological response was evaluated according to response evaluation criterion in solid tumor version 1.1. Overall progression-free survival (PFS) was assessed. Intrahepatic and extrahepatic PFS were evaluated in the whole cohort and in patients with the extrahepatic disease (EHD), respectively. Factors affecting treatment response and overall PFS were analyzed using the logistic regression model and Cox proportional hazard model. Adverse events were recorded and evaluated according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 5.0. RESULTS: The median overall PFS of the whole cohort was 13.6 months. For the patients with EHD, the median intrahepatic PFS and extrahepatic PFS were 13.6 and 26.1 months, respectively. The median overall PFS of patients with hepatic tumor burden (HTB) <10%, 10%-25%, 25%-50%, and >50% were 25.2, 13.6, 11.2, and 12.3 months, respectively. Ki67 >10%, HTB >50%, and bone metastasis were independently associated with overall PFS. The objective response rate was 78.4%. In patients with HTB 25%-50% and >50%, responders (complete response or partial response) had significant prolonged PFS compared with nonresponders (stable disease or progression disease). Ki67 >10%, bone metastasis, and clear tumor margin were independently associated with response to TAE. The most frequent adverse events that occurred after TAE were postembolization syndrome, and no treatment-associated death occurred during the perioperative period. CONCLUSION: Transarterial embolization plus octreotide LAR can significantly prolong the PFS of neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases, especially with high HTB over 50%. Selected patients with HTB >25% (ki67 ≤10%, absence of bone metastasis, clear tumor margin) could derive prognostic advantage from the combined treatment.

Efficacy and adverse events of octreotide long-acting release in acromegaly: a real-world retrospective study.

Background: Octreotide long-acting release (LAR) is a common drug used for acromegaly that aims to normalize serum growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1). However, only a few studies have evaluated its efficacy and safety in Chinese patients. This retrospective study aimed to assess its efficacy and safety in a cohort of Chinese patients with acromegaly. Methods: A total of 163 patients with acromegaly, who received continuous and regular octreotide LAR treatment at least three times at Peking Union Medical College Hospital between 2010 and 2020, were enrolled. Clinical characteristics, acromegaly activity, and other laboratory tests before and after treatment were collected for analysis. Results: The study enrolled 163 patients, including 71 men (43.6%) with a mean age of 40.94±13.00 years. After octreotide LAR treatment, 34.4% of the patients achieved GH control (<2.5 ng/mL), while IGF-1 levels were normalized in 23.3% of the patients. Also, fasting GH levels were downregulated from 4.95 ng/mL [interquartile range (IQR) 2.225, 10.325 ng/mL] at baseline to 3.2 ng/mL (IQR 1.5, 6.6 ng/mL) (P<0.001), and IGF-1/upper limit of the normal (ULN) declined from 1.89 (IQR 1.22, 2.40) to 1.41 (IQR 0.97, 1.89) (P<0.001). In addition, 65 patients experienced moderate adverse events. During the follow-up, none of the patients discontinued octreotide LAR. Further logistic regression showed that comorbidity [odds ratio (OR), 3.19; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.20-9.27; P=0.025] and previous surgery only (OR, 0.21; 95% CI: 0.08-0.58; P=0.003) were two risk factors for the development of adverse events. Conclusions: Our findings revealed that octreotide LAR treatment is effective in normalizing GH and IGF-1 levels in Chinese patients with acromegaly. In addition, adverse events related to octreotide LAR use were moderate and well tolerated by the patients.

Efficacy and Safety of First-Line Everolimus Therapy Alone or in Combination with Octreotide in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. A Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) Study.

The purpose of this study was to explore the efficacy and safety of everolimus administered as a first-line treatment in newly diagnosed patients with metastatic or inoperable gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP NETs). This phase II, multicenter, single-arm study included patients with well-differentiated GEP NETs and a Ki67 < 20%. Everolimus, at 10 mg/day, was administered until disease progression; 18 patients (72%) concomitantly received octreotide long-acting release (LAR), at 30 mg/month. The primary endpoint was the 15-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate. Twenty-five patients (grade 1: 11 patients, grade 2: 14 patients) were enrolled between August 2012 and October 2015. At a median follow-up of 58.1 months, the median PFS was 14.6 months, while the 15-month PFS rate was 48%; median overall survival had not been reached yet. Normal baseline chromogranin A (<4 nmol/l) confirmed a longer PFS (HR = 0.25, 95% CI 0.08-0.77, p = 0.016). Seven patients (28%) achieved an objective response (one complete response and six partial responses) in a median of 2.6 months. Twenty-three grade 3-4 events were recorded (14 patients). No fatal reactions occurred. This prospective phase II study unravels the notable activity of everolimus as a first-line treatment in patients with GEP NETS and contributes valuable information about the high activity of the combination of everolimus and octreotide LAR in this setting. Clinical trial information: NCT01648465.

Use of octreotide long acting repeatable (LAR) as second-line therapy in advanced neuroendocrine tumors in different clinical settings: an Italian Delphi survey.

BACKGROUND: Somatostatin receptor ligands including octreotide LAR are first-line therapy in locally advanced or metastatic NETs that are nonresectable and well differentiated and are recommended as first-line therapy in functioning and in G1/low G2 nonfunctioning NETs. However, several questions remain that are not adequately addressed in current guidelines regarding its use in clinical scenarios in which the tumor progresses. These include use of nonconventional doses or schedules of octreotide LAR in tumors with hormonal symptoms or showing clinical-radiological progression, administration in combination with everolimus, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, and chemotherapy, following first-line treatment with octreotide LAR. METHODS: An expert panel was gathered to obtain consensus using Delphi methodology on a series of statements regarding further administration of octreotide LAR after its use in first-line therapy in these settings in patients who experience disease progression. RESULTS: Consensus was reached for 8 of the 10 statements proposed in the above clinical scenarios; consensus was not achieved for two statements. CONCLUSIONS: The present statements aim to fill current gaps in treatment guidelines by providing recommendations based on expert consensus in clinical settings in which patients progress following first-line therapy with octreotide LAR.

Efficacy and safety of high-dose long-acting repeatable octreotide as monotherapy or in combination with pegvisomant or cabergoline in patients with acromegaly not adequately controlled by conventional regimens: results of an open-label, multicentre study.

INTRODUCTION: Long-acting repeatable (LAR) octreotide i.m. is a potent, synthetic somatostatin analogue (SSA) that requires less frequent dosing and offers quality of life (QoL) benefits in acromegaly patients compared to its shorter-acting predecessor. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of high-dose Sandostatin® LAR® as monotherapy or in combination with pegvisomant or cabergoline in acromegalic patients with pituitary adenomas following previous failure of conventional SSA treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: After three months of high-dose Sandostatin® LAR® monotherapy (40 mg), patients who achieved biochemical control (n = 7) continued to receive the same treatment for an additional four months, whereas uncontrolled patients were randomised to receive high-dose Sandostatin® LAR® in combination with pegvisomant (n = 31) or cabergoline (n = 32). Outcomes included biochemical response at eight months, QoL, and safety. RESULTS: After three months, 3 of 68 (4.4%) evaluable patients achieved a biochemical control (BC) as assessed by levels of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-1. At eight months, 4 of 67 (6.0%) patients achieved BC, including one receiving monotherapy and three receiving Sandostatin® LAR® plus cabergoline. Partial response rate, improvements in acromegaly signs and symptoms, and changes in QoL were similar for all three groups. All treatments were well tolerated with a slight excess of adverse events in the combination arms. There were no deaths or serious adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate that high-dose Sandostatin® LAR® as monotherapy or in combination with pegvisomant or cabergoline is a feasible salvage option in patients with pituitary adenomas not adequately controlled on conventional SSA regimens.

Entering the third decade of experience with octreotide LAR in neuroendocrine tumors: A review of current knowledge.

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a relatively rare group of heterogeneous neoplasms. The most significant advance in therapy of NETs has been the advent of the somatostatin analog octreotide, which represents a cornerstone in their management and dramatically changed the therapeutic landscape. Octreotide long-acting release (LAR) was developed to overcome some of the limitations of octreotide. Several clinical studies, including PROMID and RADIANT-2, have validated the clinical benefits of octreotide LAR in NETs, with tumor shrinkage in about 10% of patients and tumor stabilization in roughly half of cases. While the use of octreotide LAR is well-consolidated in NETs, some open questions remain. These include the use of high-dose octreotide LAR, as there is evidence that higher dose may provide longer disease control, and nonstandard treatment schedules, with administration every 21 days instead of 28 days, as well as their use in combination with targeted agents or peptide receptor radiotherapy in clinical practice. After 3 decades of clinical experience with octreotide LAR, the drug has a well-established safety profile. It is well-tolerated and treatment discontinuations due to adverse events are uncommon. One exception is cholelithiasis, which may increase with longer duration of treatment. According to the literature data, octreotide LAR is currently recommended in both functioning and nonfunctioning advanced NETs. This review summarizes the available clinical data with octreotide LAR and also provides future perspectives on its possible uses in patients with NETs.

Inoperable Giant Growth Hormone-secreting Pituitary Adenoma: Radiological Aspects, Clinical Management and Pregnancy Outcome.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Giant pituitary adenomas (GPAs) are benign tumours with a diameter ≥ 4 cm [1]. They can cause symptoms and signs due to the possible hyper-secretion of one or more pituitary hormones, and involvement of the surrounding structures whereas the compression of the pituitary itself can lead to hypopituitarism. METHODS: We report on a young woman with acromegaly due to an inoperable giant GH-secreting pituitary adenoma extending to right cavernous sinus, right orbital cavity, ethmoid, right maxillary sinus, sphenoid sinus, clivus and right temporal fossa, in which medical treatment with Octreotide- LAR was able to promptly relieve headache and bilateral hemianopsia due to optic chiasm involvement, improve acromegaly symptoms and, over the time, control tumor expansion, improving fertility and therefore allowing the patient to become pregnant. RESULTS: Octreotide-LAR therapy was withdrawn during pregnancy and the patient did not experience complications and gave birth to a healthy son. On magnetic resonance, the size of the tumor at the end of pregnancy and in the subsequent follow up was not increased. CONCLUSION: The history we report, therefore, confirms previous experiences reporting a possible favourable outcome of pregnancy in patients affected by acromegaly and adds further information about the behaviour of giant pituitary tumors in patients underwent pregnancy.

Successful Primary Medical Therapy with Somatostatin Receptor Ligand in Acromegaly with Thyroid Cancer.

Acromegaly is a rare disease with an annual incidence of 3 to 4 cases in a million.1 Diagnosis is often delayed due to the slow progression of the disease. Persistent elevation of growth hormone (GH) in acromegaly causes a reduction in life expectancy by 10 years. Aside from multiple cardiovascular, respiratory and metabolic co-morbidities, it has also been proven to cause an increased incidence of cancer. The main treatment of acromegaly is surgical excision of the functioning pituitary adenoma. Multiple comorbidities, including obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and soft tissue swelling, make surgery complicated, if not impossible. Medical therapy to reduce comorbidities may be indicated in certain situations. Somatostatin receptor ligands (SRL) are able to reduce, and possibly normalize, IGF-1 levels.2 Reduction of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), the main mediator of GH, is able to resolve headache, sweating, fatigue and soft tissue swelling, and also reduce ventricular hypertrophy. This case report illustrates the successful use of the SRL octreotide LAR in treating acromegaly. It also confirms the observation from several case series that thyroid cancer is the most common malignancy in acromegaly.

Diabetic ketoacidosis in a patient with acromegaly and central diabetes insipidus treated with octreotide long-acting release.

A 43-year-old man was diagnosed with acromegaly due to pituitary GH-secreting macroadenoma, and underwent craniotomy surgery. After surgery, he was given octreotide long-acting release (LAR) to treat the residual tumor. Eighteen months later, he presented polydipsia and polyuria due to diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and central diabetes insipidus (CDI). His casual plasma glucose level was 570 mg/dL, his HbA1c was 14.9%, and his urine was strongly positive for ketone bodies. We discuss a causal relationship among DKA, CDI, and treatment with LAR in this case with residual GH-secreting tumor from the perspective of insulin secretion and resistance.

Octreotide long-acting repeatable in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors: patient selection and perspectives.

Over the past three decades, the incidence and prevalence of neuroendocrine tumors have gradually increased. Due to the slow-growing nature of these tumors, most cases are diagnosed at advanced stages. Prognosis and survival are associated with location of primary lesion, biochemical functional status, differentiation, initial staging, and response to therapy. Octreotide, the first synthetic somatostatin analog, was initially used for the management of gastrointestinal symptoms associated with functional carcinoid tumors. Its commercial development over time led to long-acting repeatable octreotide acetate, a long-acting version that provided greater administration convenience. Recent research demonstrates that octreotide's efficacy has evolved beyond symptomatic management to targeted therapy with antitumoral effects. This review examines the history and development of octreotide, provides a synopsis on the classification, grading, and staging of neuroendocrine tumors, and reviews the evidence of long-acting repeatable octreotide acetate as monotherapy and in combination with other treatment modalities in the management of non-pituitary neuroendocrine tumors with special attention to recent high-quality Phase III trials.

Comparing the Cost of Treatment with Octreotide Long-Acting Release versus Lanreotide in Patients with Metastatic Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors.

BACKGROUND: The 2 somatostatin analogs currently recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network for the treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) include octreotide long-acting release (Sandostatin LAR) for injectable suspension and lanreotide (Somatuline Depot) injection for subcutaneous use. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the costs to payers associated with 30-mg octreotide LAR and 120-mg lanreotide treatment among patients with metastatic GI-NETs. METHODS: The costs to payers associated with the 2 drugs were estimated by including the costs of each drug, drug administration, and adverse events. The unit drug costs for octreotide LAR and for lanreotide were obtained from ReadyPrice Wholesale Acquisition Cost; the doses were obtained from published studies. The adverse event rates were obtained from 2 phase 3 clinical trials, PROMID and CLARINET. Deterministic one-way sensitivity analyses were used to assess the impact of modifying assumptions and inputs on the results, including the 2017 Average Sales Price (ASP). All costs were estimated in 2016 US dollars, with a constant discount of 3%. RESULTS: The costs to payers associated with the treatment of GI-NETs during 1-, 3-, and 5-year horizons were $74,566, $180,082, and $262,344, respectively, for octreotide LAR and $84,856, $205,562, and $299,667, respectively, for lanreotide. Thus, octreotide LAR was associated with lower costs by $10,290 (1 year), $25,480 (3 years), and $37,323 (5 years) compared with lanreotide. Over a 5-year horizon, the costs of adverse events and administration accounted for 0.72% of the total cost for octreotide LAR and 0.51% of the total cost for lanreotide. Sensitivity analyses confirmed that the main factor affecting the cost difference was the price of the drugs; analyses using the ASP yielded similar results. CONCLUSION: For the management of metastatic GI-NETs, the cost to payers of treatment with 30-mg octreotide LAR is considerably lower than with 120-mg lanreotide over 1-, 3-, and 5-year horizons. In the presence of healthcare resource constraints, these findings may support decision-making when considering the care of patients with metastatic GI-NETs.

Efficacy of octreotide long-acting repeatable in neuroendocrine tumors: RADIANT-2 placebo arm post hoc analysis.

Somatostatin analogues (SSA) have demonstrated antiproliferative activity in addition to efficacy for carcinoid symptom control in functional neuroendocrine tumors (NET). A post hoc analysis of the placebo arm of the RAD001 In Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors-2 (RADIANT-2) study was conducted to assess the efficacy of octreotide long-acting repeatable (LAR) on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Out of 213 patients randomized to placebo plus octreotide LAR in RADIANT-2, 196 patients with foregut, midgut, or hindgut NET were considered for present analysis. Of these, 41 patients were SSA-treatment naïve and 155 had received SSA therapy before study entry. For SSA-naïve patients, median PFS by adjudicated central review was 13.6 (95% CI 8.2-22.7) months. For SSA-naïve patients with midgut NET (n=24), median PFS was 22.2 (95% CI 8.3-29.5) months. For patients who had received SSA previously, the median PFS was 11.1 (95% CI 8.4-14.3) months. Among the SSA-pretreated patients who had midgut NET (n=119), the median PFS was 12.0 (95% CI 8.4-19.3) months. Median OS was 35.8 (95% CI 32.5-48.9) months for patients in the placebo plus octreotide LAR arm; 50.6 (36.4 - not reached) months for SSA-naïve patients and 33.5 (95% CI 27.5-44.7) months for those who had received prior SSA. This post hoc analysis of the placebo arm of the large phase 3 RADIANT-2 study provides data on PFS and OS among patients with progressive NET treated with octreotide therapy.

Competing risks of death in younger and older postmenopausal breast cancer patients.

AIM: To show a new paradigm of simultaneously testing whether breast cancer therapies impact other causes of death. METHODS: MA.14 allocated 667 postmenopausal women to 5 years of tamoxifen 20 mg/daily ± 2 years of octreotide 90 mg, given by depot intramuscular injections monthly. Event-free survival was the primary endpoint of MA.14; at median 7.9 years, the tamoxifen+octreotide and tamoxifen arms had similar event-free survival (P = 0.62). Overall survival was a secondary endpoint, and the two trial arms also had similar overall survival (P = 0.86). We used the median 9.8 years follow-up to examine by intention-to-treat, the multivariate time-to-breast cancer-specific (BrCa) and other cause (OC) mortality with log-normal survival analysis adjusted by treatment and stratification factors. We tested whether baseline factors including Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1), IGF binding protein-3, C-peptide, body mass index, and 25-hydroxy vitamin D were associated with (1) all cause mortality, and if so and (2) cause-specific mortality. We also fit step-wise forward cause-specific adjusted models. RESULTS: The analyses were performed on 329 patients allocated tamoxifen and 329 allocated tamoxifen+octreotide. The median age of MA.14 patients was 60.1 years: 447 (82%) < 70 years and 120 (18%) ≥ 70 years. There were 170 deaths: 106 (62.3%) BrCa; 55 (32.4%) OC, of which 24 were other malignancies, 31 other causes of death; 9 (5.3%) patients with unknown cause of death were excluded from competing risk assessments. BrCa and OC deaths were not significantly different by treatment arm (P = 0.40): tamoxifen patients experienced 50 BrCa and 32 OC deaths, while tamoxifen + octreotide patients experienced 56 BrCa and 23 OC deaths. Proportionately more deaths (P = 0.004) were from BrCa for patients < 70 years, where 70% of deaths were due to BrCa, compared to 54% for those ≥ 70 years of age. The proportion of deaths from OC increased with increasing body mass index (BMI) (P = 0.02). Higher pathologic T and N were associated with more BrCa deaths (P < 0.0001 and 0.002, respectively). The cumulative hazard plot for BrCa and OC mortality indicated the concurrent accrual of both types of death throughout follow-up, that is the existence of competing risks of mortality. MA.14 therapy did not impact mortality (P = 0.77). Three baseline patient and tumor characteristics were differentially associated with cause of death: older patients experienced more OC (P = 0.01) mortality; patients with T1 tumors and hormone receptor positive tumors had less BrCa mortality (respectively, P = 0.01, P = 0.06). Additionally, step-wise cause-specific models indicated that patients with node negative disease experienced less BrCa mortality (P = 0.002); there was weak evidence that, lower C-peptide (P = 0.08) was associated with less BrCa mortality, while higher BMI (P = 0.01) was associated with worse OC mortality. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate here a new paradigm of simultaneous testing of therapeutics directed at multiple diseases for which postmenopausal women are concurrently at risk. Octreotide LAR did not significantly impact breast cancer or other cause mortality, although different baseline factors influenced type of death.

Clinical applications of somatostatin analogs for growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas.

Excessive growth hormone (GH) is usually secreted by GH-secreting pituitary adenomas and causes gigantism in juveniles or acromegaly in adults. The clinical complications involving cardiovascular, respiratory, and metabolic systems lead to elevated morbidity in acromegaly. Control of serum GH and insulin-like growth factor (IGF) 1 hypersecretion by surgery or pharmacotherapy can decrease morbidity. Current pharmacotherapy includes somatostatin analogs (SAs) and GH receptor antagonist; the former consists of lanreotide Autogel (ATG) and octreotide long-acting release (LAR), and the latter refers to pegvisomant. As primary medical therapy, lanreotide ATG and octreotide LAR can be supplied in a long-lasting formulation to achieve biochemical control of GH and IGF-1 by subcutaneous injection every 4-6 weeks. Lanreotide ATG and octreotide LAR provide an effective medical treatment, whether as a primary or secondary therapy, for the treatment of GH-secreting pituitary adenoma; however, to maximize benefits with the least cost, several points should be emphasized before the application of SAs. A comprehensive assessment, especially of the observation of clinical predictors and preselection of SA treatment, should be completed in advance. A treatment process lasting at least 3 months should be implemented to achieve a long-term stable blood concentration. More satisfactory surgical outcomes for noninvasive macroadenomas treated with presurgical SA may be achieved, although controversy of such adjuvant therapy exists. Combination of SA and pegvisomant or cabergoline shows advantages in some specific cases. Thus, an individual treatment program should be established for each patient under a full evaluation of the risks and benefits.