RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Partial nephrectomy is standard-of-care treatment for small renal masses. As utilization of partial nephrectomy increases and includes larger and complex tumors, the risk of conversion to radical nephrectomy likely increases. We evaluated incidence and reason for conversion to radical nephrectomy in patients scheduled for partial nephrectomy by surgeons participating in MUSIC (the Michigan Urologic Surgery Improvement Collaborative). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients in whom robotic partial nephrectomy was planned were stratified by completed procedure (robotic partial nephrectomy vs radical nephrectomy). Preoperative and intraoperative records were reviewed for preoperative assessment of difficulty and reason for conversion. Patient, tumor, pathologic, and practice variables were compared between cohorts. RESULTS: Of 650 patients scheduled for robotic partial nephrectomy, conversion to radical nephrectomy occurred in 27 (4.2%) patients. No conversions to open were reported. Preoperative documentation indicated a plan for possible conversion in 18 (67%) patients including partial with possible radical (n = 8), partial vs radical (n = 6), or likely radical nephrectomy (n = 4). Intraoperative documentation indicated that only 5 (19%) conversions were secondary to bleeding, with the remaining conversions due to tumor complexity and/or oncologic concerns. Patients undergoing conversion had larger (4.7 vs 2.8 cm, P < .001) and higher-complexity tumors (64% vs 6%, P < .001) with R.E.N.A.L. (for radius, exophytic/endophytic, nearness of tumor to collecting system, anterior/posterior, location relative to polar line) nephrometry score ≥ 10. The converted cases had a higher rate of ≥ pT3 (27% vs 8.4%, P = .008). CONCLUSIONS: There was a low rate of conversion from robotic partial to radical nephrectomy in the MUSIC-KIDNEY (Kidney mass: Identifying and Defining Necessary Evaluation and therapY) collaborative, and an even lower risk of conversion due to uncontrolled bleeding. Targeted review of each conversion identified appropriate decision-making based on oncologic risk in most cases.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Renales , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Robótica , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Nefrectomía/efectos adversos , Nefrectomía/métodos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Reoperative partial nephrectomy (RePN) offers several advantages for the treatment of recurrent, multifocal renal masses. RePN has been previously demonstrated to be technically feasible and delay the need for renal replacement therapy. However, there is still inherent complexity and known risks to reoperative nephrectomy. We studied the largest population of RePNs to characterize renal functional outcomes and the likelihood of intra- and postoperative complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Query of an institutional surgical registry was conducted. Demographic data, serum creatinine for estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and protein dipstick results were assessed within 1 week prior to surgery, and postoperative function assessments were studied within a year of surgery. RePN was defined as serial surgical resection of the ipsilateral renal unit. RESULTS: A total of 1131 partial nephrectomies performed on 663 patients at a single center were retrospectively evaluated. In reoperative cases, median number of operations per renal unit was 2 (range: 2-6). There was a stepwise decline in eGFR with an average decline of 6.1 with each RePN. With each subsequent nephrectomy, surgical duration, estimated blood loss, and incidence of preoperative anemia increased. Postoperative eGFR showed a significant positive association with preoperative eGFR, while negative associations were found with age, number of previous ipsilateral partial nephrectomies, number of tumors, and largest tumor size. High-grade complications were associated with the number of ipsilateral partial nephrectomies, tumor count, and tumor size. Robotic or laparoscopic procedures exhibited a likelihood of grade 3 or greater complications compared to open surgery. CONCLUSIONS: RePN contributes to renal dysfunction and an increased risk of surgical complications. Intraoperative blood loss and surgical duration increase with subsequent nephrectomy. Such risks are dependent on the number of prior operative interventions on the kidney, suggesting a stepwise progression of surgical morbidity.
Asunto(s)
Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Neoplasias Renales , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Nefrectomía , Reoperación , Humanos , Nefrectomía/métodos , Nefrectomía/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: AUA guidelines prioritize nephron sparing in patients with preexisting chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, few studies analyze long-term renal function in patients with preoperative severe CKD who undergo extirpative renal surgery. Herein, we compare the hazard of progression to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) following partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) among patients with preoperative severe CKD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with stage 4 CKD who underwent PN or RN from 1970 to 2018 were identified. A multivariable Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model was employed to assess associations with progression to ESKD accounting for the competing risk of death. RESULTS: A total of 186 patients with stage 4 CKD underwent PN (n = 71; 38%) or RN (n = 115; 62%) for renal neoplasms with median follow-up of 6.9 years (interquartile range 3.8-14.1). On multivariable analyses adjusting for competing risk of death, the subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR) for older age at surgery (SHR for 5-year increase 0.81; 95% CI 0.73-0.91; P < .001) and higher preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (SHR for 5-unit increase 0.63; 95% CI 0.47-0.84; P = .002) was associated with lower hazard of progression to ESKD. There was no significant difference in hazard of ESKD between PN and RN (SHR 0.82; 95% CI 0.50-1.33; P = .4). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with preoperative severe CKD, higher preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate was associated with lower hazard of progression to ESKD after extirpative surgery for renal neoplasms. We did not observe a significant difference in overall hazard for developing ESKD between PN and RN.
Asunto(s)
Progresión de la Enfermedad , Fallo Renal Crónico , Neoplasias Renales , Nefrectomía , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Humanos , Nefrectomía/métodos , Nefrectomía/efectos adversos , Masculino , Femenino , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Fallo Renal Crónico/etiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Neoplasias Renales/mortalidad , Anciano , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/etiología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Filtración GlomerularRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the benefits and safety of microwave scissors-based sutureless laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (MSLPN) with those of conventional open partial nephrectomy (cOPN). METHODS: Each kidney in nine pigs underwent MSLPN using microwave scissors (MWS) via transperitoneal laparoscopy or cOPN via retroperitoneal open laparotomy. The kidney's lower and upper poles were resected under temporary hilar-clamping. The renal calyces exposed during renal resections were sealed and transected using MWS in MSLPN and were sutured in cOPN. For MWS, the generator's power output was 60 W. Data on procedure time (PT), ischemic time (IT), blood loss (BL), normal nephron loss (NNL), and extravasation during retrograde pyelogram were compared between the two techniques. RESULTS: The authors successfully performed 22 MSLPNs and 10 cOPNs. Compared with cOPN, MSLPN was associated with significantly lower PT (median, 9.2 vs 13.0 min; p = 0.026), IT (median, 5.9 vs 9.0 min; p < 0.001), BL (median, 14.4 vs 38.3 mL; p = 0.043), and NNL (median, 7.6 vs 9.4 mm; p = 0.004). However, the extravasation rate was higher in the MSLPN group than in the cOPN group (54.5 % [n = 12] vs 30.0 % [n = 3]), albeit without a significant difference (p = 0.265). Pelvic stenosis occurred in one MSLPN procedure that involved deep lower pole resection near the kidney hilum. CONCLUSIONS: The study data show that MSLPN can improve intraoperative outcomes while reducing technical demands for selected patients with non-hilar-localized renal tumors. However, renal calyces, if violated, should be additionally sutured to prevent urine leakage.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Microondas , Nefrectomía , Animales , Nefrectomía/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Porcinos , Microondas/uso terapéutico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Tempo Operativo , Femenino , Instrumentos QuirúrgicosRESUMEN
Kidney cancer represents the third most prevalent malignancy among all types of genitourinary cancer worldwide. Currently, there is a growing trend of employing partial nephrectomy for the management of large and complex tumors. Surgical outcomes are associated with some amendable surgical factors, including warm ischemic time, pedicle clamping, preserved volume of renal parenchyma, appropriate surgical strategy, and precise resection of the tumor. Improving surgical performance is pivotal for achieving favorable surgical outcomes. Due to advancements in imaging visualization technology and the shift of the medical paradigm toward precision medicine, an increasing number of navigation systems have been implemented in partial nephrectomy procedures. The navigation system can assist surgeons in formulating optimal surgical strategies and enhance the safety, precision, and feasibility of resecting complex renal tumors. In this review, we provide an overview of currently available navigation systems and their feasible applications, with a focus on how they contribute to the improvement of surgical performance and outcomes during robotic-assisted and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Renales , Laparoscopía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Nefrectomía/métodos , Riñón , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Nephron-sparing approaches are preferred for renal mass in a solitary kidney (RMSK), with partial nephrectomy (PN) generally prioritized. Thermal ablation (TA) also is an option for small renal masses in this setting; however, comparative functional/survival outcomes are not well-defined. METHODS: A retrospective study of 504 patients (1975-2022) with cT1 RMSK managed with PN (n = 409)/TA (n = 95) with necessary data for analysis was performed. Propensity score was used for matching patients, including age, preoperative glomerular filtration rate (GFR), tumor diameter, R.E.N.A.L. ((R)adius (tumor size as maximal diameter), (E)xophytic/endophytic properties of tumor, (N)earness of tumor deepest portion to collecting system or sinus, (A)nterior (a)/posterior (p) descriptor, and (L)ocation relative to polar lines), and comorbidities. Functional outcomes were compared, and Kaplan-Meier was used to analyze survival. RESULTS: The matched cohort included 132 patients (TA = 66/PN = 66), with median tumor diameter of 2.4 cm, R.E.N.A.L. of 6, and preoperative GFR of 52 ml/min/1.73 m2. Acute kidney injury occurred in 11%/61% in the TA/PN cohorts, respectively (p < 0.01). After recovery, median GFR preserved was 89%/83% for TA/PN, respectively (p = 0.02), and 5-year dialysis-free survival was 96% in both cohorts. Median follow-up was 53 months. Five-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 62%/86% in the TA/PN cohorts, respectively (p < 0.01). Five-year local recurrence (LR)-free survival was 74%/95% in the TA/PN cohorts, respectively (p < 0.01). Five-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) was 96%/98% in the TA/PN cohorts, respectively (p = 0.7). Local recurrence was observed in nine of 36 (25%) and five of 30 (17%) patients managed with laparoscopic versus percutaneous TA, respectively. For TA with LR (n = 14), nine patients presented with multifocality and/or cT1b tumors. Twelve LR were managed with salvage TA, and seven remained cancer-free, while five developed systemic recurrence, three with concomitant LR. CONCLUSIONS: Functional outcomes for TA for RMSK were improved compared with PN. Local recurrence was more common after TA and often was associated with the laparoscopic approach, multifocality, and large tumor size. Improved patient selection and greater experience with TA should improve outcomes. Salvage of LR was not always possible. Partial nephrectomy remains the reference standard for RMSK.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Riñón Único , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Renales/cirugía , Riñón Único/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Nefrectomía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Deterioration of renal function is associated with increased all-cause mortality. In renal masses larger than 4 cm, whether partial versus radical nephrectomy (PN vs. RN) might affect long-term functional outcomes is unknown. This study tested the association between PN versus RN and postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI), recovery of at least 90% of the preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 1 year, upstaging of chronic kidney disease (CKD) one stage or more at 1 year, and eGFR decline of 45 ml/min/1.73 m2 or less at 1 year. METHODS: Data from 23 high-volume institutions were used. The study included only surgically treated patients with single, unilateral, localized, clinical T1b-2 renal masses. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Overall, 968 PN patients and 325 RN patients were identified. The rate of AKI was lower in the PN versus the RN patients (17% vs. 58%; p < 0.001). At 1 year after surgery, for the PN versus the RN patients, the rate for recovery of at least 90% of baseline eGFR was 51% versus 16%, the rate of CKD progression of ≥ 1 stage was 38% versus 65%, and the rate of eGFR decline of 45 ml/min/1.73 m2 or less was 10% versus 23% (all p < 0.001). Radical nephrectomy independently predicted AKI (odds ratio [OR], 7.61), 1-year ≥ 90% eGFR recovery (OR, 0.30), 1-year CKD upstaging (OR, 1.78), and 1-year eGFR decline of 45 ml/min/1.73 m2 or less (OR, 2.36) (all p ≤ 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: For cT1b-2 masses, RN portends worse immediate and 1-year functional outcomes. When technically feasible and oncologically safe, efforts should be made to spare the kidney in case of large renal masses to avoid the hazard of glomerular function loss-related mortality.
Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Neoplasias Renales , Nefrectomía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , Nefrectomía/métodos , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Lesión Renal Aguda/etiología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/cirugía , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Carcinoma de Células Renales/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Which is superior, partial nephrectomy (PN) or radical nephrectomy (RN), for the treatment of complex renal tumours (RENAL or score ≥ 7)? METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement. A systematic search of the literature published before November 2023 was conducted using Pubmed, Embase, Cochran, and Web of Science libraries. We included studies comparing perioperative and oncologic outcomes of partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy for complex renal tumors. RESULTS: A total of 2602 patients from six studies meeting the criteria were included. The PN group had a longer operative time, increased estimated blood loss, and major complications but a smaller reduction in renal function. There were no significant differences in complications, length of hospital stay, and blood transfusion. In terms of oncological outcomes, the PN group had longer OS, CSS, and no significant difference in RFS. CONCLUSIONS: For complex renal tumours, PN requires more operative time and has a higher chance of complications in the short term. However, in long-term follow-up, PN has a small decrease in renal function with longer OS and CSS.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Renales , Nefrectomía , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Nefrectomía/métodos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Tempo Operativo , Pronóstico , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To introduce the KESKIN ratio as a novel predictor of positive surgical margin (PSM) after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (PN) and to evaluate other clinical characteristics and nephrometry scores (including RENAL, PADUA, and C-index) for predicting PSM. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 95 patients who underwent laparoscopic PN between June 2020 and April 2023. The KESKIN ratio was defined for all patients. The KESKIN ratio, tumor and patient-related paramaters, and nephrometry scores were analyzed to predict PSM. RESULTS: Positive surgical margin was found in 12 of 95 patients (12.6%). There was no statistical difference between the PSM and negative surgical margin (NSM) groups in RENAL, PADUA, and C-index scores. Only the KESKIN ratio was found to be a statistically significant predictor of PSM in both univariate and multivariate regression analysis (p = 0.007 and p = 0.043, respectively). Mean endophytic diameter and endophytic percentage were found to be statistically significant predictors of PSM in only univariate analysis (p = 0.005 and p = 0.01, respectively). The value of 0.5 was determined as the cut-off value for the KESKIN ratio. Values higher than 0.5 indicate an increase in PSM. CONCLUSIONS: The KESKIN ratio is a novel, easily measurable, and calculable image-based parameter that can be used to predict PSM after laparascopic PN. If externally validated in a larger patient population, the KESKIN ratio may be used in future versions of the current nephrometry scoring systems for predicting the PSM.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Renales , Laparoscopía , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Márgenes de Escisión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Nefrectomía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To develop a novel nomogram for predicting 2-year and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with cT1-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) undergoing partial nephrectomy (PN). METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted across five urological centers, including 940 patients who underwent PN for cT1N0M0-ccRCC. Four centers were randomly selected to constitute the training group, while the remaining center served as the testing group. We employed the LASSO and multivariate Cox regression to develop new nomograms. The 1,000 bootstrap-corrected c-index, net reclassification improvement (NRI) and receiver operating characteristic curve were employed to compare the predictive abilities of new nomograms with the widely used UUIS and SSIGN models. Finally, the novel nomograms underwent external validation. RESULTS: The training group included 714 patients, while the testing group consisted of 226 patients. The bootstrap-corrected c-indexes for the DFS and OS model were 0.870 and 0.902, respectively. In the training cohort, the AUC for the DFS and OS models at 2 years and 5 years were 0.953, 0.902, 0.988, and 0.911, respectively. These values were also assessed in the testing cohort. The predictive capabilities of the new nomograms surpassed those of the UUIS and SSIGN models (NRI > 0). Decision curve analysis demonstrated that the novel nomograms provide greater net benefits compared to the UUIS and SSIGN models. CONCLUSIONS: Our novel nomograms demonstrated strong predictive ability for forecasting oncological outcomes in cT1-ccRCC patients after PN. These user-friendly nomograms are simple and convenient for clinical application, providing tangible clinical benefits.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Nefrectomía , Nomogramas , Humanos , Femenino , Nefrectomía/mortalidad , Nefrectomía/métodos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Neoplasias Renales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Carcinoma de Células Renales/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Renales/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Tasa de Supervivencia , Estudios de Seguimiento , Pronóstico , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Curva ROC , Anciano , Supervivencia sin EnfermedadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the risk factors for the conversion from laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) to open surgery to achieve partial nephrectomy (PN). METHODS: Data from patients who underwent LPN between June 2020 and September 2023 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients in whom the PN procedure could be completed laparoscopically were recorded as the 'Fully Laparoscopic' (FL) group (n = 97), and those converted to open surgery from laparoscopy were recorded as the 'Conversion to Open' (CTO) group (n = 10). The demographic and pathologic variables were compared between groups. Regression analyses were used to define predictor factors, and receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to define the cut-off value of the surgical bleeding volume. RESULTS: Conversion to open surgery was found in 10/107 patients (9.3%). There was no statistical difference between groups in demographic and pathologic variables. Intraoperative blood loss volume, upper pole localized tumor, and posterior localized tumor were found to be statistically higher in the CTO group (p = 0.001, p = 0.001, and p = 0.043, respectively). Furthermore, these factors were only found to be statistically significant predictors of conversion to open surgery in both univariate and multivariate regression analyses. 235 cc was found to be the cut-off value of intraoperative blood loss volume for predicting conversion to open surgery (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Using these predictive factors in clinical practice, treatment planning will lead to the possibility of starting the treatment directly with open surgery instead of minimally invasive options, and it may also provide a chance of being prepared for the possibility of conversion to open surgery peroperatively.
Asunto(s)
Conversión a Cirugía Abierta , Neoplasias Renales , Laparoscopía , Nefrectomía , Nefronas , Humanos , Nefrectomía/métodos , Femenino , Masculino , Laparoscopía/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Conversión a Cirugía Abierta/estadística & datos numéricos , Nefronas/cirugía , Nefronas/patología , Tratamientos Conservadores del Órgano/métodos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Pronóstico , Anciano , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Complicaciones PosoperatoriasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study was designed to develop an innovative classification and guidance system for renal hilar tumors and to assess the safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for managing such tumors. METHODS: A total of 179 patients undergoing RAPN for renal hilar tumors were retrospectively reviewed. A novel classification system with surgical techniques was introduced and the perioperative features, tumor characteristics, and the efficacy and safety of RAPN were compared within subgroups. RESULTS: We classified the tumors according to our novel system as follows: 131 Type I, 35 Type II, and 13 Type III. However, Type III had higher median R.E.N.A.L., PADUA, and ROADS scores compared with the others (all p < 0.001), indicating increased operative complexity and higher estimated blood loss [180.00 (115.00-215.00) ml]. Operative outcomes revealed significant disparities between Type III and the others, with longer operative times [165.00 (145.00-200.50) min], warm ischemia times [24.00 (21.50-30.50) min], tumor resection times [13.00 (12.00-15.50) min], and incision closure times [22.00 (20.00-23.50) min] (all p < 0.005). Postoperative outcomes also showed significant differences, with longer durations of drain removal (77.08 ± 18.16 h) and hospitalization for Type III [5.00 (5.00-6.00) d] (all p < 0.05). Additionally, Type I had a larger tumor diameter than the others (p = 0.009) and pT stage differed significantly between the subtypes (p = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: The novel renal hilar tumor classification system is capable of differentiating the surgical difficulty of RAPN and further offers personalized surgical steps tailored to each specific classification. It provides a meaningful tool for clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Renales , Nefrectomía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Neoplasias Renales/clasificación , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Femenino , Masculino , Nefrectomía/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Anciano , Tempo Operativo , Pronóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/clasificación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Carcinoma de Células Renales/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Carcinoma de Células Renales/clasificación , Isquemia Tibia , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study utilizes a meta-analytic approach to investigate the effects of cryoablation and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy on perioperative outcomes, postoperative renal function, and oncological results in patients. METHODS: This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library database) were systematically searched to identify relevant studies published in English up to November 2023. The primary outcomes were perioperative results, complications, postoperative renal function and oncologic outcomes. Review Manager 5.4 was used for this analysis. RESULTS: This study included a total of 10 studies comprising 2,011 patients. Compared to RAPN (Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy), the CA (Cryoablation) group had a shorter hospital stay [MD -1.76 days; 95% CI -3.12 to -0.41; p = 0.01], less blood loss [MD -104.60 ml; 95% CI -152.58 to -56.62; p < 0.0001], and fewer overall complications [OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.45 to 0.86; p = 0.004], but a higher recurrence rate [OR 7.83; 95% CI 4.32 to 14.19; p < 0.00001]. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of operative time, minor complications (Clavien-Dindo Grade 1-2), major complications (Clavien-Dindo Grade 3-5), changes in renal function at 12 months post-operation, RFS (Recurrence-Free Survival), and OS (Overall Survival). CONCLUSION: The evidence provided by this meta-analysis indicates that the therapeutic effects of Cryoablation (CA) are similar to those of Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy (RAPN) in terms of perioperative outcomes and renal function. However, the recurrence rate of tumors treated with CA is significantly higher. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: The study has been registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO: CRD42023465846).
Asunto(s)
Criocirugía , Neoplasias Renales , Nefrectomía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Criocirugía/métodos , Criocirugía/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Nefrectomía/métodos , Nefrectomía/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To report the results of PADRES (Prior Axitinib as a Determinant of Outcome of Renal Surgery, NCT03438708), a study investigating neoadjuvant axitinib for tumours of high complexity with imperative indication for partial nephrectomy (PN). METHODS: We conducted a single-arm phase II clinical trial of localized (cT1b-cT3M0) clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients with imperative indications for nephron preservation, where PN is a high-risk procedure due to complexity (RENAL score 10-12). Axitinib 5 mg was administered twice daily for 8 weeks with repeat imaging at completion, followed by surgery. The primary outcome was successful completion of planned PN following axitinib treatment. Secondary objectives included changes in tumour diameter, RENAL nephrometry score, renal function and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) v1.1, and surgical complications. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were enrolled (median age 69 years). Prior to therapy, twenty patients (74.0%) had ≥ clinical T3a staged tumours. Axitinib resulted in reductions in tumour diameter (7.5 vs 6.2 cm; P < 0.001) and RENAL score (11 vs 10; P < 0.001). Nine patients (33.3%) had partial response based on RECIST and nine (33.3%) were clinically downstaged. PN was performed in twenty patients (74.0%); twenty-five patients (96.2%) had negative margins. Six patients (22.2%) had Clavien III-IV complications. The median change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (preoperative to last follow-up) was 8.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 . CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant axitnib resulted in reductions in tumour size and complexity, enabling safe and feasible PN and functional preservation in patients with complex renal masses and imperative indication.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Humanos , Anciano , Axitinib/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Resultado del Tratamiento , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Nefrectomía/métodos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare intra- and postoperative outcomes between off-clamp and on-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN), using data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or covariate-matched studies (propensity score-matched or matched-pair analysis). METHODS: A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant literature review was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and CENTRAL for relevant studies comparing off-clamp to on-clamp RAPN. Primary outcomes were estimated blood loss, postoperative percentage decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and margin positive rate. Secondary outcomes were operative time, postoperative eGFR, length of stay, all postoperative complications, major complications, and need for transfusion. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to generate mean differences (MDs) or odds ratios (ORs). RESULTS: A total of 10 studies (2307 patients) were shortlisted for analysis. There was no significant difference in estimated operative blood loss between off-clamp and on-clamp RAPN (MD 21.9 mL, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.9 to 44.7 mL; P = 0.06, I2 = 58%). Off-clamp RAPN yielded a smaller postoperative eGFR deterioration (MD 3.10%, 95% CI 1.05-5.16%; P = 0.008, I2 = 13%) and lower odds of margin positivity (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.40-0.94; P = 0.03, I2 = 0%). No significant differences were found for all secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Off-clamp and on-clamp RAPN are similarly effective approaches for selected renal masses. Within the classic trifecta of PN outcomes, off-clamp RAPN yields similar rates of perioperative complications and may possibly offer better preservation of renal function and reduced margin-positive rates.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Renales , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Robótica , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Nefrectomía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To rigorously evaluate the impact of the percentage of parenchymal volume preserved (PPVP) and how well the preserved parenchyma recovers from ischaemia (Recischaemia) on functional outcomes after partial nephrectomy (PN) using an accurate and objective software-based methodology for estimating parenchymal volumes and split renal function (SRF). A secondary objective was to assess potential predictors of the PPVP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 894 PN patients with available studies (2011-2014) were evaluated. The PPVP was measured from cross-sectional imaging at ≤3 months before and 3-12 months after PN using semi-automated software. Pearson correlation evaluated relationships between continuous variables. Multivariable linear regression evaluated predictors of ipsilateral glomerular filtration rate (GFR) preserved and the PPVP. Relative-importance analysis was used to evaluate the impact of the PPVP on ipsilateral GFR preserved. Recischaemia was defined as the percentage of ipsilateral GFR preserved normalised by the PPVP. RESULTS: The median tumour size and R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score were 3.4 cm and 7, respectively. In all, 49 patients (5.5%) had a solitary kidney. In all, 538 (60%)/251 (28%)/104 (12%) patients were managed with warm/cold/zero ischaemia, respectively. The median pre/post ipsilateral GFRs were 40/31 mL/min/1.73 m2, and the median (interquartile range [IQR]) percentage of ipsilateral GFR preserved was 80% (71-88%). The median pre/post ipsilateral parenchymal volumes were 181/149 mL, and the median (IQR) PPVP was 84% (76-92%). In all, 330 patients (37%) had a PPVP of <80%, while only 34 (4%) had a Recischaemia of <80%. The percentage of ipsilateral GFR preserved correlated strongly with the PPVP (r = 0.83, P < 0.01) and loss of parenchymal volume accounted for 80% of the loss of ipsilateral GFR. Multivariable analysis confirmed that the PPVP was the strongest predictor of ipsilateral GFR preserved. Greater tumour size and endophytic and nearness properties of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score were associated with a reduced PPVP (all P ≤ 0.01). Solitary kidney and cold ischaemia were associated with an increased PPVP (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A reduced PPVP predominates regarding functional decline after PN, although a low Recischaemia can also contribute. Tumour-related factors strongly influence the PPVP, while surgical efforts can improve the PPVP as observed for patients with solitary kidneys.
Asunto(s)
Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Neoplasias Renales , Riñón , Nefrectomía , Tratamientos Conservadores del Órgano , Humanos , Nefrectomía/métodos , Femenino , Masculino , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Riñón/irrigación sanguínea , Tratamientos Conservadores del Órgano/métodos , Tamaño de los Órganos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tejido Parenquimatoso , Carga TumoralRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To comprehensively compare quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes between open partial nephrectomy (OPN) and robot-assisted PN (RAPN) from the randomised ROBOtic-assisted versus Conventional Open Partial nephrectomy (ROBOCOP) II trial, as QoL data comparing OPN and RAPN are virtually non-existent, especially not from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The ROBOCOP II was a single-centre, open-label RCT between OPN and RAPN. The pre-planned analyses of QoL outcomes are presented. Data were analysed descriptively in a modified intention-to-treat population. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients underwent surgery. At postoperative Day 90 (POD90), there was no significant difference for the Kidney Disease Quality of Life-Short Form questionnaire score (mean [sd] OPN 72 [20] vs RAPN 76 [15], P = 0.850), while there were advantages for RAPN in the subdomains of 'Pain' (P = 0.006) and 'Physical functioning' (P = 0.011) immediately after surgery. For the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire 30-item core there were overall advantages directly after surgery (mean [sd] score OPN 63 [20] vs RAPN 75 [17], P = 0.031), as well as for the subdomains 'Fatigue' (P = 0.026), 'Pain' (P = 0.002) and 'Constipation' (P = 0.045) but no differences at POD90. There were no differences for the EuroQoL five Dimensions five Levels questionnaire at POD90 (mean [sd] score OPN 70 [22] vs RAPN 72 [17], P = 1.0) or at any other time point. Finally, no significant differences were found for the overall Convalescence and Recovery Evaluation questionnaire score at POD90 (mean [sd] OPN 84 [13] vs RAPN 86 [10], P = 0.818) but less pain in the RAPN group (P = 0.017) directly after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Pain and physical functioning as subdomains of QoL are improved after RAPN compared to OPN in the early postoperative course, while there are no differences anymore after 3 months.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Renales , Nefrectomía , Calidad de Vida , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Nefrectomía/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Anciano , Resultado del Tratamiento , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and feasibility of using a novel purpose-built single-port robotic system (the SHURUI Robotic Surgical System) with deformable surgical instruments to perform retroperitoneal single-port partial nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study was conducted to recruit patients with a single renal tumor no more than 4 cm. Robot-assisted single-port partial nephrectomy was performed by using the novel purpose-built single-port robotic system with deformable surgical instruments. Patients' demographics, tumor characteristics, and perioperative parameters were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were recruited to the study. The median tumor size was 2.0 cm (IQR: 1.2-2.4 cm). The median R.E.N.A.L score was 6 (IQR: 4-4.5). In 3 cases, pure single-port surgery was carried out, and all the assistance was through the robotic port. Median docking time was 15.5 min (IQR: 14.25-22.25 min). Median operating time was 148.5 min (IQR: 178-238.5 min). Median console time was 107 min (IQR: 92.75-149.75 min). Median warm ischemic time was 26.5 min (IQR: 24.5-30 min). Median blood loss was 17.5 ml (IQR: 10-50 ml). CONCLUSIONS: Retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy can be safely performed with this novel purpose-built single-port robotic system (SHURUI) with deformable surgical instruments. Further studies are needed to fully evaluate the role of this new platform.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Renales , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Robótica , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Nefrectomía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) can be performed either by a transperitoneal (TP) or a retroperitoneal (RP) approach. However, the superiority of one approach over the other is not established. Hence, the primary aim of this review was to compare perioperative outcomes between these two surgical approaches. METHODS: Literature was systematically searched to identify studies reporting perioperative outcomes following TP RAPN and RP RAPN. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023399496). The primary outcome was comparing complication rates between the two approaches. RESULTS: This review included 22 studies, 5675 patients, 2524 in the RP group, and 3151 in the TP group. The overall complications were significantly lower in the RP group [Odds ratio (OR) 0.80 (0.67, 0.95), p = 0.01]. However, the rate of major complications was similar between the two groups. The operative time was significantly shorter with the RP group [Mean Difference (MD)-16.7 (- 22.3, - 11.0), p = < 0.0001]. Estimated blood loss (EBL) and need for blood transfusion (BT) were significantly lower in the RP group. There was no difference between the two groups for conversion to radical nephrectomy [OR 0.66 (0.33, 1.33), p = 0.25] or open surgery [OR 0.68 (0.24, 1.92, p = 0.47] and positive surgical margins [OR 0.93 (0.66, 1.31, p = 0.69]. Length of stay (LOS) was shorter in the RP group [MD - 0.27 (- 0.45, - 0.08), p = < 0.00001]. CONCLUSIONS: RP approach, compared to TP, has significantly lower complication rates, EBL, need for BT and LOS. However, due to the lack of randomized studies on the topic, further data is required.
Asunto(s)
Nefrectomía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Transfusión Sanguínea , Tiempo de Internación , Nefrectomía/métodos , Oportunidad RelativaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: One key focus of partial nephrectomy is preserving renal function. Segmental renal artery occlusion with microdissection at the renal hilum confines ischemia, effectively reducing warm ischemic injury. Ultrasound-Guided Renal Artery Balloon Catheter Occluded Hybrid Partial Nephrectomy (UBo-HPN) can achieve branch occlusion without the need for dissecting the renal hilum. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility and safety of UBo-HPN of branch renal artery occlusion in the treatment of localized renal tumors. SUBJECT AND METHODS: A prospective single-arm analysis involving 20 patients with renal localized tumors underwent robot assisted UBo-HPN with branch renal artery occlusion from August 2021 to July 2023, with an average follow-up of 12 months. RESULTS: All patient was successfully operated on without conversion to conventional arterial clamping or radical nephrectomy. One case (5%) of minor complication occurred in the whole cohort, which was bruising around the puncture site. The mean total operative time was 95.8 min, with a mean operative time of 21.25 min for vascular intervention. The mean warm ischemia time was 20.35 min, and the median estimated blood loss was 50 ml. The median eGFR preservation percentage at postoperative 48 h, 30 days, and the latest follow-up were 87.52%, 91.47%, and 92.2%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 10.2 (2.3-19.2) months, no patients had radiological tumor recurrence or died from tumor-related causes. CONCLUSIONS: UBo-HPN with renal artery branch occlusion emerges as an efficient alternative to partial nephrectomy (PN), which achieved branch artery occlusion without dissecting the renal hilum. Long-term follow-up is expected for functional outcomes.