Use of existing electronic health care databases to evaluate medication safety in pregnancy: Triptan exposure in pregnancy as a case study.

PURPOSE: The recent expansion of electronic health and medical record systems may present an opportunity to generate robust post-approval safety data and obviate the limitations of prospective pregnancy exposure registries. We examined and compared, over the same time frame, the outcomes of triptan exposure in pregnancy using (1) a retrospective claims database and (2) a previously completed pregnancy registry. METHODS: Using the Marketscan database, the risk of major birth defects was ascertained in live-born infants whose birth mothers were exposed to sumatriptan, naratriptan, or sumatriptan/naproxen during pregnancy. The frequencies of outcomes observed were compared with the findings of the 16-year sumatriptan, naratripan, and sumatriptan/naproxen prospective pregnancy registry. RESULTS: About 5120 pregnancies were identified in the retrospective claims cohort in contrast to 617 included in the prospective registry during the same time frame. The proportion of major birth defects among first-semester sumatriptan exposures was 4.0%, which is exactly the same as the proportion of major birth defects reported for first-semester sumatriptan exposures in the registry. There were very few non-livebirth outcomes in both the claims analyses and registry. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm broad agreement between the database analysis and the registry regarding the safety of triptans during pregnancy. Of note, the number of triptan-exposed pregnancies identified in this large US database was about 7-fold that included in the prospective registry over the same time frame. The findings of this study support an approach of using existing health care database (s) in the post-approval assessment of medication exposure in pregnancy.

Effects of gestational age at enrollment in pregnancy exposure registries.

PURPOSE: This study aims to explore the influence of gestational age at enrollment, and enrollment before or after prenatal screening, on the estimation of drug effects in pregnancy exposure registries. METHODS: We assessed the associations between first trimester antiepileptic drug (AED) exposure and risk of spontaneous abortion and major congenital malformations in the North American AED Registry (1996-2013). We performed logistic regression analyses, conditional or unconditional on gestational age at enrollment, to estimate relative risk (RR) for first trimester AED users compared with non-users. We also compared first trimester users of valproic acid and lamotrigine. Analyses were repeated in women who enrolled before prenatal screening. RESULTS: Enrollment occurred earlier among 7029 AED users than among 581 non-users; it was similar among AEDs. Comparing AED users with non-users, RR (95% confidence interval) of spontaneous abortion (n = 359) decreased from 5.1 (2.3-14.1) to 2.0 (0.9-5.6) after conditioning on gestational week at enrollment and to 1.9 (0.8-5.4) upon further restriction to before-screening enrollees. RR of congenital malformations (n = 216) changed from 3.1 (1.4-8.5) to 3.2 (1.4-9.0) after conditioning on gestational week at enrollment and to 2.0 (0.7-10.1) upon further restriction to before-screening enrollees. When comparing valproic acid users and lamotrigine users, the RR of congenital malformations was not substantially changed by conditioning or restricting. CONCLUSIONS: Spontaneous abortion rates were sensitive to gestational age at enrollment. Estimates of congenital malformation risks for AED users relative to non-users were sensitive to before/after-screening enrollment. This difference was not apparent between active drugs, likely due to similar gestational age at enrollment.

Current safety concerns about the use of antiseizure medications in pregnancy.

INTRODUCTION: Given the high prevalence of epilepsy in women of childbearing potential (15 million out of 50 million people worldwide), antiseizure medication (ASM) use in pregnancy is common. Identifying the safest and most effective ASM to use during pregnancy is often difficult, but also crucially important. The challenge is to balance two needs: maintaining seizure control while minimizing teratogenicity. AREAS COVERED: This review looks at seizure- and treatment-related risks to mother and fetus during pregnancy, existing healthcare information programmes, strengths and pitfalls of the main pregnancy registries, known and supposed pharmacokinetic changes during gestation, the utility of therapeutic drug monitoring, and safety concerns. Articles and related content were screened on available publications after January 2000. EXPERT OPINION: The use of newer ASMs during pregnancy is still limited, as shown by the paucity of data collected by different pregnancy registries. Choosing these medications can be challenging, partly due to unknown pharmacokinetic modifications in pregnancy, an aspect that serum drug monitoring might help to clarify. The safest treatment is chosen also taking into account the woman's needs, concerns and wishes, but adequate pre-pregnancy counseling is necessary to properly inform her about personal and fetal risks related both to seizures and to medications.