Measuring response in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer using PSMA PET/CT: comparison of RECIST 1.1, aPCWG3, aPERCIST, PPP, and RECIP 1.0 criteria.

PURPOSE: To compare the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1, the adapted Prostate Cancer Working Group Criteria 3 (aPCWG3), the adapted Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (aPERCIST), the PSMA PET Progression (PPP), and the Response Evaluation Criteria In PSMA-Imaging (RECIP) 1.0 for response evaluation using prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-PET/CT in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with 177Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy. METHODS: A total of 124 patients were included in this multicenter retrospective study. All patients received 177Lu-PSMA and underwent PSMA-PET/CT scans at baseline (bPET) and at 12 weeks (iPET). Imaging responses according to RECIST 1.1, aPCWG3, aPERCIST, PPP, and RECIP 1.0 were interpreted by consensus among three blinded readers. Changes in total tumor burden were obtained using the semi-automatic qPSMA software. The response according to each criterion was classified to progressive disease (PD) vs no-PD. Primary outcome measure was the prognostic value (by Cox regression analysis) for overall survival (OS). Secondary outcome measure was the inter-reader reliability (by Cohen's κ coefficient). RESULTS: A total of 43 (35%) of patients had non-measurable disease according to RECIST 1.1. Sixteen (13%), 66 (52%), 72 (58%), 69 (56%), and 39 (32%) of 124 patients had PD according to RECIST 1.1, aPCWG3, aPERCIST, PPP, and RECIP, respectively. PD vs no-PD had significantly higher risk of death according to aPCWG3 (HR = 2.37; 95%CI, 1.62-3.48; p < 0.001), aPERCIST (HR = 2.48; 95%CI, 1.68-3.66; p < 0.001), PPP (HR = 2.72; 95%CI, 1.85-4.01; p < 0.001), RECIP 1.0 (HR = 4.33; 95%CI, 2.80-6.70; p < 0.001), but not according to RECIST 1.1 (HR = 1.29; 95%CI, 0.73-2.27; p = 0.38). The κ index of RECIST 1.1, aPCWG3, aPERCIST 1.0, PPP, and RECIP 1.0 for identifying PD vs no-PD were 0.50 (95%CI, 0.32-0.76), 0.72 (95%CI, 0.63-0.82), 0.68 (95%CI, 0.63-0.73), 0.73 (95%CI, 0.63-0.83), and 0.83 (95%CI, 0.77-0.88), respectively. CONCLUSION: PSMA-PET-specific criteria for early response evaluation in men with mCRPC treated with 177Lu-PSMA achieved higher prognostic values and inter-reader reliabilities in comparison to conventional CT assessment or to criteria adapted to PSMA-PET from other imaging modalities. RECIP 1.0 identified the fewest patients with PD and achieved the highest risk of death for PD vs. no-PD, suggesting that other classification methods tend to overcall progression. Prospective validation of our findings on an independent patient cohort is warranted.

Carcinoid syndroma - diagnosis and management.

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs, originally termed “carcinoids”) create a relatively rare group of neoplasms with an approximate incidence rate of 5 to 8 cases per 10 000 persons. NETs predominantly demonstrate indolent disease biology for many years. They become symptomatic when they are large enough or when they metastasize to the liver or the lungs, bones, or other sites. Roughly 30% to 40% of subjects with NETs develop carcinoid syndrome. Signs and symptoms of carcinoid syndrome are bronchospasm, flushing, diarrhea and cramping, cyanosis and pellagra. White plaque-like deposits on the endocardial surface of heart structures are characteristic for carcinoid heart disease. The treatment of patients with carcinoid syndrome is multi-faceted due to the necessity to manage simultaneously the systemic cancer disease as well as the signs of carcinoid syndrome and includes resection or debulking of tumor mass, biological treatment with somatostatin analogues and peptide receptor radionuclide treatment.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Treatment and (131)I-MIBG in the management of patients with metastatic/progressive phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Radionuclide therapy has been used to treat patients with progressive/metastatic paragangliomas (PGLs) and phaeochromocytomas (PCCs). The aim of the present study is to retrospectively compare the therapeutic outcomes of these modalities in patients with progressive/metastatic PCCs and PGLs. METHODS: Patients with progressive/metastatic PGLs and PCCs that were subjected to radionuclide treatment in our department were retrieved from our department's database for the period 1998-2013. Overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), event free survival (EFS), and response to treatment were calculated. Treatment toxicity was documented. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients with progressive/metastatic PGLs or PCCs were treated with either (131)I-MIBG, (90)Y-DOTATATE or (177)Lu-DOTATATE. A total of 30 treatments were administered (16 treatments with (131)I-MIBG, 2 with (177)Lu-DOTATATE, and 12 with (90)Y-DOTATATE. Patients treated with PRRT had increased PFS and response to treatment compared to (131)I-MIBG treated patients (P < 0.05). However, difference in OS was non significant (P = 0.09). There was no difference in major toxicities between groups. When comparing only patients with PGLs, OS, PFS, EFS, and response to treatment were significantly higher in the PRRT treatment group. CONCLUSION: PRRT treatment offers increased OS, PFS, EFS, and response to treatment compared to (131)I-MIBG therapy in patients with progressive/malignant PGLs.

Pre-therapeutic dosimetry of normal organs and tissues of (177)Lu-PSMA-617 prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) inhibitor in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: (177)Lu-617-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligand seems to be a promising tracer for radionuclide therapy of progressive prostate cancer. However, there are no published data regarding the radiation dose given to the normal tissues. The aim of the present study was to estimate the pretreatment radiation doses in patients who will undergo radiometabolic therapy using a tracer amount of (177)Lu-labeled PSMA ligand. METHODS: The study included seven patients with progressive prostate cancer with a mean age of 63.9 ± 3.9 years. All patients had prior PSMA positron emission tomography (PET) imaging and had intense tracer uptake at the lesions. The injected (177)Lu-PSMA-617 activity ranged from 185 to 210 MBq with a mean of 192.6 ± 11.0 MBq. To evaluate bone marrow absorbed dose 2-cc blood samples were withdrawn in short variable times (3, 15, 30, 60, and 180 min and 24, 48, and 120 h) after injection. Whole-body images were obtained at 4, 24, 48, and 120 h post-injection (p.i.). The geometric mean of anterior and posterior counts was determined through region of interest (ROI) analysis. Attenuation correction was applied using PSMA PET/CT images. The OLINDA/EXM dosimetry program was used for curve fitting, residence time calculation, and absorbed dose calculations. RESULTS: The calculated radiation-absorbed doses for each organ showed substantial variation. The highest radiation estimated doses were calculated for parotid glands and kidneys. Calculated radiation-absorbed doses per megabecquerel were 1.17 ± 0.31 mGy for parotid glands and 0.88 ± 0.40 mGy for kidneys. The radiation dose given to the bone marrow was significantly lower than those of kidney and parotid glands (p < 0.05). The calculated radiation dose to bone marrow was 0.03 ± 0.01 mGy/MBq. CONCLUSION: Our first results suggested that (177)Lu-PSMA-617 therapy seems to be a safe method. The dose-limiting organ seems to be the parotid glands rather than kidneys and bone marrow. The lesion radiation doses are within acceptable ranges; however, there is a substantial individual variance so patient dosimetry seems to be mandatory.

Radioligand therapies in meningioma - evidence and future directions.

Meningiomas are the most common intracranial neoplasms in adults. While most meningiomas are cured by resection, further treatment by radiotherapy may be needed, particularly in WHO grade 2 and 3 tumors which have an increased risk of recurrence, even after conventional therapies. Still, there is an urgent need for novel therapeutic strategies after exhaustion of local treatment approaches. Radionuclide therapies combine the specificity of tumor-specific antibodies or ligands with the cytotoxic activity of radioactive emitters. Alongside, integrated molecular imaging allows for a non-invasive assessment of predictive biomarkers as treatment targets. Whereas the concept of "theranostics" has initially evolved in extracranial tumors such as thyroid diseases, neuroendocrine tumors, and prostate cancer, data from retrospective case series and early phase trials underscore the potential of this strategy in meningioma. This review aims to explore the available evidence of radionuclide treatments and ongoing clinical trial initiatives in meningioma. Moreover, we discuss optimal clinical trial design and future perspectives in the field, including compound- and host-specific determinants of the efficacy of "theranostic" treatment approaches.

Leveraging Programmatic Collaboration for a Radiopharmaceutical Clinic.

Radiation oncologists, radiopharmacists, nuclear medicine physicians, and medical oncologists have seen a renewed clinical interest in radiopharmaceuticals for the curative or the palliative treatment of cancer. To allow for the discovery and the clinical advancement of targeted radiopharmaceuticals, these stakeholders have reformed their trial efforts and remodeled their facilities to accommodate the obligations of a program centered upon radioactive investigational drug products. Now considered informally as drugs and not beam radiotherapy, radiopharmaceuticals can be more easily studied in the traditional clinical trial enterprise ranging from phase 0-I to phase III studies. Resources and physical facilities allocated to radiopharmaceuticals have brought forth new logistics and patient experience for safe and satisfactory drug delivery. The clinical use of theranostic agents-that is, diagnostic and therapeutic radionuclide pairs-has accelerated radiopharmaceutical development.

The Application of Radiolabeled Targeted Molecular Probes for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Prostate Cancer.

Radiopharmaceuticals targeting prostate-specific membrane antigens (PSMA) are essential for the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of prostate cancer (PCa), particularly metastatic castration-resistant PCa, for which conventional treatment is ineffective. These molecular probes include [68Ga]PSMA, [18F]PSMA, [Al18F]PSMA, [99mTc]PSMA, and [89Zr]PSMA, which are widely used for diagnosis, and [177Lu]PSMA and [225Ac]PSMA, which are used for treatment. There are also new types of radiopharmaceuticals. Due to the differentiation and heterogeneity of tumor cells, a subtype of PCa with an extremely poor prognosis, referred to as neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC), has emerged, and its diagnosis and treatment present great challenges. To improve the detection rate of NEPC and prolong patient survival, many researchers have investigated the use of relevant radiopharmaceuticals as targeted molecular probes for the detection and treatment of NEPC lesions, including DOTA-TOC and DOTA-TATE for somatostatin receptors, 4A06 for CUB domain-containing protein 1, and FDG. This review focused on the specific molecular targets and various radionuclides that have been developed for PCa in recent years, including those mentioned above and several others, and aimed to provide valuable up-to-date information and research ideas for future studies.

Aggressive and Metastatic Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors: Therapeutic Management and Off-Label Drug Use.

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) are the most common pituitary tumors and the second most common brain tumors. Although the vast majority (>90%) are benign, a small percentage (<2%) are aggressive. These aggressive PitNETs (AgPitNETs) are defined by the presence of radiological invasion, a high rate of cell proliferation, resistance to conventional treatments, and/or a high propensity for recurrence. Lastly, there are the rare pituitary carcinomas, also known as metastatic PitNETs (MetPitNETs), which account for only 0.2% of cases and are defined by the presence of craniospinal or distant metastases. At present, there are no definitive factors that allow us to predict with certainty the aggressive behavior of PitNETs, making the therapeutic management of AgPitNETs a real challenge. Surgery is considered the first-line treatment for AgPitNETs and MetPitNETs. Radiation therapy can be effective in controlling tumor growth and regulating hormone hypersecretion. Currently, there are no approved non-endocrine medical therapies for the management of AgPitNETs/MetPitNETs, mainly due to the lack of randomized controlled clinical trials. As a result, many of the medical therapies used are off-label drugs, and several are under investigation. Temozolomide (TMZ) is now recognized as the primary medical treatment following the failure of standard therapy (medical treatment, surgery, and radiotherapy) in AgPitNETs/MetPitNETs due to its ability to improve overall and progression-free survival rates in responding patients over 5 years. Other therapeutic options include pituitary-targeted therapies (dopamine agonists and somatostatin analogs), hormonal antisecretory drugs, non-hormonal targeted therapies, radionuclide treatments, and immunotherapy. However, the number of patients who have undergone these treatments is limited, and the results obtained to date have been inconsistent. As a result, it is imperative to expand the cohort of patients undergoing treatment to better determine the therapeutic efficacy and safety of these drugs for individuals with AgPitNETs/MetPitNETs.

Treatment efficacy in a metastatic small intestinal neuroendocrine tumour grade 2 cohort.

Small intestinal neuroendocrine tumours (Si-NET) are often studied as a uniform group. Proliferation index Ki-67 influences prognosis and determines tumour grade. We hypothesized that Si-NET grade 2 (G2) tumours, which have a higher Ki-67 than G1 tumours, might benefit less from established treatments for metastatic disease. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 212 patients with metastatic Si-NET G2 treated in two Swedish hospitals during 20 years (2000-2019). Median cancer-specific survival on first-line somatostatin analogues (SSA) was 77 months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.4 months when SSA was given as monotherapy and 19 months for all patients receiving first-line SSA. PFS after SSA dose escalation was 6 months in patients with radiological progression. Treatment efficacies of SSA and peptide receptor radionuclide treatment (PRRT) were studied separately in patients with Ki-67 of 3-5%, 5-10% and 10-20%. For SSA, PFS was significantly shorter at higher Ki-67 levels (31, 18 and 10 months, respectively), while there was only a minor difference in PFS for PRRT (29, 25 and 25 months). Median PFS for sequential treatment with interferon-alpha (IFNα), everolimus and chemotherapy was 6, 5 and 9 months. IFNα seemed to be effective in tumours with low somatostatin-receptor expression. In conclusion, established treatments appeared effective in Si-NET G2, despite their higher proliferation index compared to G1 tumours. However, efficacy of SSA but not PRRT was reduced at higher Ki-67 levels. SSA dose escalation provided limited disease stabilization.

Novel Framework for Treatment Response Evaluation Using PSMA PET/CT in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (RECIP 1.0): An International Multicenter Study.

Our objective was to develop version 1.0 of a novel framework for response evaluation criteria in prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT (RECIP) and a composite response classification that combines responses by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurements and by RECIP 1.0 (PSA + RECIP). Methods: This was an international multicenter, retrospective study. One hundred twenty-four men with metastatic castration-specific prostate cancer (mCRPC) who underwent 177Lu-PSMA therapy and received PSMA PET/CT at baseline and at an interim time point of 12 wk were included. Pairs of baseline interim PET/CT scans were interpreted by consensus among 3 masked readers for appearance of new lesions. Tumor lesions were segmented, and total PSMA-positive tumor volume (PSMA-VOL) was obtained. Appearance of new lesions and changes in PSMA-VOL were combined to develop RECIP 1.0, which included classifications of complete response (RECIP-CR: absence of any PSMA-ligand uptake on interim PET/CT), partial response (RECIP-PR: decline ≥ 30% in PSMA-VOL and no appearance of new lesions), progressive disease (RECIP-PD: increase ≥ 20% in PSMA-VOL and appearance of new lesions), and stable disease (RECIP-SD: any condition but RECIP-PR or RECIP-PD). Changes in PSA levels at 12 wk by Prostate Cancer Working Group Criteria 3 were recorded. PSA + RECIP results were defined as response (PSA decline ≥ 50% or RECIP-PR/CR) or progression (PSA increase ≥ 25% or RECIP-PD). The study's primary outcome measure was the prognostic value of RECIP 1.0 for overall survival (OS). The secondary outcome measure was the prognostic accuracy (C-index) of PSA + RECIP versus PSA responses. Results: Patients with RECIP-PD (n = 39; 8.3 mo) had a shorter OS than patients with stable disease (RECIP-SD) (n = 47; 13.1 mo; P < 0.001) or RECIP-PR (n = 38; 21.7 mo; P < 0.001). In identifying responders and progressors, PSA + RECIP had C-indices superior to those of PSA only: 0.65 versus 0.62 (P = 0.028) and 0.66 versus 0.63 (P = 0.044), respectively. Conclusion: PSMA PET/CT by RECIP 1.0 is prognostic for OS and can be used as a response biomarker to monitor early efficacy of 177Lu-PSMA in men with mCRPC. PSA + RECIP may be used as a novel composite endpoint in mCRPC clinical trial design.

Advances in the Diagnosis and Therapeutic Management of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (GEP-NENs).

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are an increasingly common cause of neoplastic diseases. One of the largest groups of NENs are neoplasms localized to the gastroenteropancreatic system, which are known as gastroenteropancreatic NENs (GEP-NENs). Because of nonspecific clinical symptoms, GEP-NEN patient diagnosis and, consequently, their treatment, might be difficult and delayed. This situation has forced researchers all over the world to continue progress in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with GEP-NENs. Our review is designed to present the latest reports on the laboratory diagnostic techniques, imaging tests and surgical and nonsurgical treatment strategies used for patients with these rare neoplasms. We paid particular attention to the nuclear approach, the use of which has been applied to GEP-NEN patient diagnosis, and to nonsurgical and radionuclide treatment strategies. Recent publications were reviewed in search of reports on new strategies for effective disease management. Attention was also paid to those studies still in progress, but with successful results. A total of 248 papers were analyzed, from which 141 papers most relevant to the aim of the study were selected. Using these papers, we highlight the progress in the development of diagnostic and treatment strategies for patients with GEP-NENs.

Efficacy and Safety of 177Lu-labeled Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Radionuclide Treatment in Patients with Diffuse Bone Marrow Involvement: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

The 177Lu-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (LuPSMA) radionuclide therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer is under investigation in a phase III trial (VISION: NCT03511664). However, patients with diffuse bone involvement, diagnosed with a "superscan" by bone scintigraphy at baseline, were excluded due to a lack of efficacy and safety data. We therefore aimed to investigate the feasibility of LuPSMA in patients with diffuse bone marrow involvement on baseline PSMA-targeted positron emission tomography. The primary end points were prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 [PCWG3]), hematologic safety profile (Common Terminology Criteria for Common Adverse Events [CTCAE]), and overall survival. Secondary end points of quality of life (assessed with Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form questionnaires) and radiologic response (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST]) were assessed. Through retrospective screening of databases, we identified 43 eligible patients across four centers worldwide who received 154 cycles of LuPSMA under clinical trials or compassionate access programs. Median baseline PSA was 1000 (interquartile range 431-2151) ng/ml. PSA decline of at least 50% at 12 wk was achieved in 22 (58%) patients, while median time to pain progression was 8.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.1-12.6) mo. Median overall survival was 11.6 (95% CI 8.8-14.3) mo. Objective response in nodal or visceral disease was reported in seven (39%) of 18 patients with RECIST measurable disease. Grade 3 anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia occurred in nine (22%), seven (17%), and three (8%) patients, respectively. Grade 4 thrombocytopenia was noticed in three (8%) patients. In conclusion, patients with diffuse bone marrow involvement demonstrated similar LuPSMA efficacy and safety to phase II evidence. Acceptable safety outcomes do not support exclusion of patients with a superscan from future LuPSMA treatment protocols. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report, we investigated the feasibility of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-directed radionuclide treatment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and diffuse bone involvement. We found that, despite a high load of bone metastases, PSMA-targeted therapy remains efficacious and safe when compared with the current phase II trial results.

Radionuclide therapy of painful bone metastases--a comparative study between consecutive radionuclide infusions, combination with chemotherapy, and radionuclide infusions alone: an in vivo comparison of their effectiveness.

Radionuclides have been long used for the palliation of skeletal-related metastatic pain. They are almost invariably used as the last resource for pain palliation. Their use as single agents with dose escalations, in combination with biphosphonates or chemotherapy is well known in the peer-reviewed literature; however, little is known about the combination between different agents. In our study, we used consecutive administration of 2 different radionuclides such as (186)Re-1,1-hydroxyethylidenediphosphonate ((186)Re-HEDP) and (89)Strontium Chloride ((89)Sr-Cl) separated by adequate period of time to allow bone marrow recovery in patients with high chance of bone pain relapse and compared it with (89)Sr-Cl and chemotherapy group and (186)Re-HEDP with bisphosphonates. The end result was that treatment with consecutive radionuclides was much more effective and safe than the other 2 groups.