A Rapid Response Mobile Application Improves First-Year Resident Clinical Performance During Simulated Care Events: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Rapid response teams (RRTs) are critical to the timely and appropriate management of acutely decompensating patients. In the academic setting, the vital role of RRT leader is often filled by a junior resident physician who may lack the necessary medical knowledge and experience. Cognitive aids help improve guideline adherence and may support resident performance as they transition into leadership roles. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the impact of a rapid response mobile application on intern performance during simulated rapid response events. DESIGN: This randomized controlled trial compared the performance of interns in two simulated rapid response scenarios with and without access to the rapid response mobile application. The scenarios included anaphylaxis and supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). Simulations were video recorded and coded by trained raters. PARTICIPANTS: Interns in all specialties at our institution. MAIN MEASURES: Outcomes included (1) time to ordering critical medications (epinephrine and adenosine), (2) overall clinical performance using a checklist-based performance measure, and (3) usability of the mobile application. Enrollment and data collection occurred between November 2022 and February 2023. KEY RESULTS: Forty-four interns from 12 specialties were randomized to the intervention group (N = 22) and the control group (N = 22). Time to order critical medications was significantly reduced in the intervention group compared to control for anaphylaxis (P < 0.005) and SVT (P < 0.005). The intervention group had significantly higher performance scores compared to the control group for the anaphylaxis portion (P < 0.006). Usability scores for the rapid response toolkit were good. CONCLUSIONS: Access to a rapid response mobile application improved the quality of care administered by interns during two simulated rapid response scenarios as determined by a decrease in time to ordering critical medications and improved performance scores. The intervention group found the mobile application to be usable. This work adds to existing literature supporting the use of technology-based cognitive aids to improve patient care.

Predictive value of a tiered escalation response system: A case control study.

OBJECTIVE: Rapid response systems designed to detect and respond to clinical deterioration often incorporate a multitiered, escalation response. We sought to determine the 'predictive strength' of commonly used triggers, and tiers of escalation, for predicting a rapid response team (RRT) call, unanticipated intensive care unit admission, or cardiac arrest (events). DESIGN: This was a nested, matched case-control study. SETTING: The study setting involved a tertiary referral hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Cases experienced an event, and controls were matched patients without an event. OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity and specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were measured. Logistic regression determined the set of triggers with the highest AUC. RESULTS: There were 321 cases and 321 controls. Nurse triggers occurred in 62%, medical review triggers in 34%, and RRT triggers 20%. Positive predictive value of nurse triggers was 59%, that of medical review triggers was 75%, and that of RRT triggers was 88%. These values were no different when modifications to triggers were considered. The AUC was 0.61 for nurses, 0.67 for medical review, and 0.65 for RRT triggers. With modelling, the AUC was 0.63 for the lowest tier, 0.71 for next highest, and 0.73 for the highest tier. CONCLUSION: For a three-tiered system, at the lowest tier, specificity of triggers decreases, sensitivity increases, but the discriminatory power is poor. Thus, there is little to be gained by using a rapid response system with more than two tiers. Modifications to triggers reduced the potential number of escalations and did not affect tier discriminatory value.

Rapid response teams-how and who? A protocol for a randomised clinical trial evaluating the composition of the efferent limb of the rapid response system.

BACKGROUND: Many patients experiencing deterioration have documented deviation of vital signs prior to the deterioration event. Increasing focus on these patients led to the rapid response systems and their configuration with afferent and efferent limbs. The two most prevalent team constellations in the efferent limb are the medical emergency team (MET), usually led by a doctor, and the critical care outreach team (CCOT), usually led by a nurse. The two constellations have not previously been examined in a comparative clinical trial. METHODS: This is a single centre non-inferiority randomised controlled trial of MET vs CCOT. All patients will be randomised at the time of the call. The intervention group will be the critical care outreach team. The primary outcome is mortality at 30 days and the occurrence of serious adverse events. All patients will be followed for 90 days. We aim to detect or reject a change of 7% in mortality whilst accepting a type I error of 5 and type II error of 20, using a sample size of maximum of 2000 individual patients. DISCUSSION: There is evidence supporting a benefit for the patient when using rapid response systems; however, earlier randomised studies are marked by cross-contamination and selection bias. Previous studies have primarily examined the effect of RRS on hospital cardiac arrests (IHCA) and mortality. Our study will be examining the effect on intensive care unit admissions as well as the ICHA and mortality. CONCLUSION: This study may highlight potential benefits of specific configurations of rapid response systems and their impact on safety outcomes.

Paediatric cardiac rapid response systems: a survey of multicentre practices.

INTRODUCTION: While the efficacy and guidelines for implementation of rapid response systems are well established, limited information exists about rapid response paradigms for paediatric cardiac patients despite their unique pathophysiology. METHODS: With endorsement from the Paediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Society, we designed and implemented a web-based survey of paediatric cardiac and multidisciplinary ICU medical directors in the United States of America and Canada to better understand paediatric cardiac rapid response practices. RESULTS: Sixty-five (52%) of 125 centres responded. Seventy-one per cent of centres had ∼300 non-ICU beds and 71% had dedicated cardiac ICUs. To respond to cardiac patients, dedicated cardiac rapid response teams were utilised in 29% of all centres (39% and 5% in centres with and without dedicated cardiac ICUs, respectively) [p = 0.006]. Early warning scores were utilised in 62% of centres. Only 31% reported that rapid response teams received specialised training. Transfers to ICU were higher for cardiac (73%) compared to generalised rapid response events (54%). The monitoring and reassessment of patients not transferred to ICU after the rapid response was variable. Cardiac and respiratory arrests outside the ICU were infrequent. Only 29% of centres formally appraise critical deterioration events (need for ventilation and/or inotropes post-rapid response) and 34% perform post-event debriefs. CONCLUSION: Paediatric cardiac rapid response practices are variable and dedicated paediatric cardiac rapid response systems are infrequent in the United States of America and Canada. Opportunity exists to delineate best practices for paediatric cardiac rapid response and standardise practices for activation, training, patient monitoring post-rapid response events, and outcomes evaluation.

Contextual factors influencing patients' experiences of acute deterioration and medical emergency team (MET) encounter: A grounded theory study.

AIM: This paper explores the personal, social and structural factors that influence patients' experiences of acute deterioration and medical emergency team (MET) encounter. BACKGROUND: Patient experience is recognized as a means of assessing healthcare delivery with a positive experience being linked to high-quality healthcare, improved patient safety and reduced length of stay. The experience of acute deterioration is unique, extensive and complex. However, little is known about this experience from the patient's perspective. DESIGN: Constructivist grounded theory, informed by Kathy Charmaz, was used to explore the personal, social and structural factors that influence patients' experiences of acute deterioration and MET encounter. METHODS: Using a semi-structured interview guide, in-depth individual interviews were conducted with 27 patients from three healthcare services in Victoria, Australia. Data were collected over a 12-month period from 2018 to 2019. Interview data were analysed using grounded theory processes. FINDINGS: Contextual factors exert a powerful influence on patients' experiences of acute deterioration and MET encounter. The most significant factors identified include patients' expectations and illness perception, relationship with healthcare professionals during MET call and past experiences of acute illness. The expectations and perceptions patients had about their disease can condition their overall experience. Healthcare professional-patient interactions can significantly impact quality of care, patient experience and recovery. Patients' experiences of illness and healthcare can impact a person's future health-seeking behaviour and health status. CONCLUSION: Patients' actions and processes about their experiences of acute deterioration and MET encounter are the result of the complex interface of contextual factors. IMPACT: The findings from this study have highlighted the need for revised protocols for screening and management of patients who experience acute deterioration.

Construct and clinical verification of a nurse-led rapid response systems and activation criteria.

BACKGROUND: Effective team leadership and good activation criteria can effectively initiate rapid response system (RRS) to reduce hospital mortality and improve quality of life. The first reaction time of nurses plays an important role in the rescue process. To construct a nurse-led (nurse-led RRS) and activation criteria and then to conduct a pragmatic evaluation of the nurse-led RRS. METHODS: We used literature review and the Delphi method to construct a nurse-led RRS and activation criteria based on the theory of "rapid response system planning." Then, we conducted a quasi-experimental study to verify the nurse-led RRS. The control group patients were admitted from August to October 2020 and performed traditional rescue procedures. The intervention group patients were admitted from August to October 2021 and implemented nurse-led RRS. The primary outcome was success rate of rescue. SETTING: Emergency department, Gansu Province, China. RESULTS: The nurse-led RRS and activation criteria include 4 level 1 indicators, 14 level 2 indicators, and 88 level 3 indicators. There were 203 patients who met the inclusion criteria to verify the nurse-led RRS. The results showed that success rate of rescue in intervention group (86.55%) was significantly higher than that in control group (66.5%), the rate of cardiac arrest in intervention group (33.61%) was significantly lower than that in control group (72.62%), the effective rescue time of intervention group (46.98 ± 12.01 min) was shorter than that of control group (58.67 ± 13.73 min), and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The rate of unplanned ICU admissions in intervention group (42.85%) was lower than that in control group (44.04%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The nurse-led RRS and activation criteria can improve the success rate of rescue, reduce the rate of cardiac arrest, shorten the effective time of rescue, effectively improve the rescue efficiency of patients.

Proactive rounding: Perspectives and experiences of nurses and midwives working in a large metropolitan hospital.

BACKGROUND: Rounding by the Rapid Response team (RRT) is an integral part of safety and quality care of the deteriorating patient. Rounding enables Intensive Care Units (ICU) liaison nurses to proactively identify deteriorating patients in the general wards and minimize the time spent by general nursing staff to call for assistance. OBJECTIVE: The study examined nurses' and midwives' experiences of proactive rounding by a RRT/ICU Liaison service, including the impact on workflow and patient care as well as enablers and barriers to utilization of the service. METHOD: A mixed method approach was used: an online survey and semi-structured interviews with nurses and midwives in an acute care setting. RESULTS: 52 respondents completed the online survey and 6 participated in a semi-structured interviews. The majority of survey respondents found the service useful and indicated that rounding by the ICU Liaison service improves patient care. Participants also believed that pro-active rounding increases staff confidence and builds rapport when utilizing the ICU Liaison service. Barriers to use of the service included the lack of out of normal business hours support and obtaining prompt support. CONCLUSION: Proactive rounding was perceived by nurses and midwives to be beneficial for both themselves and patients, and ensured that deteriorating patients were identified.

[Internal hospital emergency management : Concepts for optimization of patient safety in hospitals]. / Innerklinisches Notfallmanagement : Konzepte zur Optimierung der Patientensicherheit im Krankenhaus.

Critical incidents in hospitals can often be predicted hours before the event and can mostly be detected earlier and presumably avoided. Quality management programs from US hospitals to reduce deaths following a severe postoperative complication (failure to rescue, FTR), have in this form not yet become established in Germany. A sensitive score-based early warning system for looming complications is decisive for successful in-hospital emergency management. In addition to measurement rounds where the frequency is adapted to the severity, this includes effective communication of the results to the ward physician, who in the best case scenario solves the problem alone. If the deployment of a medical rapid response emergency team (MET) is necessary, there must be clear chain of alarm pathways and the personnel on the ward must be able to take initial bridging action until the MET arrives. The MET provides 24/7 emergency and intensive medical expertise for peripheral wards and must be familiar with the location, well-equipped and trained. Communication skills are particularly required not only to be able to handle the immediate emergency situation but also to organize the downstream diagnostics and escalation of treatment; however, the MET is only one of the links in the in-hospital rescue chain, which can only improve the patient outcome when alerted in a timely manner. Feedback systems, such as participation in the German Resuscitation Registry, allow reflection of one's own performance in a national comparison. The chances offered by a MET will only be fully realized when it is integrated into an in-hospital emergency concept and this determines the added value for patient safety.

Prognostic accuracy of the Hamilton Early Warning Score (HEWS) and the National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) among hospitalized patients assessed by a rapid response team.

BACKGROUND: Rapid response teams (RRTs) respond to hospitalized patients experiencing clinical deterioration and help determine subsequent management and disposition. We sought to evaluate and compare the prognostic accuracy of the Hamilton Early Warning Score (HEWS) and the National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) for prediction of in-hospital mortality following RRT activation. We secondarily evaluated a subgroup of patients with suspected infection. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data (2012-2016) of consecutive RRT patients from two hospitals. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. We calculated the number needed to examine (NNE), which indicates the number of patients that need to be evaluated in order to detect one future death. RESULTS: Five thousand four hundred ninety-one patients were included, of whom 1837 (33.5%) died in-hospital. Mean age was 67.4 years, and 51.6% were male. A HEWS above the low-risk threshold (≥ 5) had a sensitivity of 75.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 73.9-77.9) and specificity of 67.6% (95% CI 66.1-69.1) for mortality, with a NNE of 1.84. A NEWS2 above the low-risk threshold (≥ 5) had a sensitivity of 84.5% (95% CI 82.8-86.2), and specificity of 49.0% (95% CI: 47.4-50.7), with a NNE of 2.20. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was 0.76 (95% CI 0.75-0.77) for HEWS and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.71-0.74) for NEWS2. Among suspected infection patients (n = 1708), AUROC for HEWS was 0.79 (95% CI 0.76-0.81) and for NEWS2, 0.75 (95% CI 0.73-0.78). CONCLUSIONS: The HEWS has comparable clinical accuracy to NEWS2 for prediction of in-hospital mortality among RRT patients.

Derivation and validation of a risk score for predicting mortality among inpatients following rapid response team activation.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Despite mature rapid response systems (RRS) for clinical deterioration, individuals activating RRS have poor outcomes, with up to one in four dying in hospital. We aimed to derive and validate a risk prediction tool for estimating risk of 28-day mortality among hospitalised patients following rapid response team (RRT) activation. STUDY DESIGN: Analysis of prospectively collected data on 1151 consecutive RRT activations involving 800 inpatients at a tertiary adult hospital. Patient characteristics, RRT triggers and actions, and mortality were ascertained from medical records and death registries. A multivariable risk prediction regression model, derived from 600 randomly selected patients, was validated in the remaining 200 patients. Main outcome was accuracy of weighted risk score (measured by area under receiver operator curve (AUC)) and performance characteristics for various cut-off scores. RESULTS: At 28 days, 150 (18.8%) patients had died. Increasing age, emergency admission, chronic liver disease, chronic kidney disease, malignancy, after-hours RRT activation, increasing National Early Warning Score, major/intense RRT intervention and multiple RRT activations were predictors of mortality. The risk score (0-105) in derivation and validation cohorts had AUCs 0.86 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.89) and 0.82 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.90), respectively. In the validation cohort, cut-off score of 32.5 or higher maximised sensitivity: 81.6% (95% CI 68.4% to 92.1%), specificity: 56.2% (95% CI 49.4% to 63.6%), positive likelihood ratio (LR): 1.9 (95% CI 1.5 to 2.3) and negative LR: 0.3 (95% CI 0.2 to 0.6). CONCLUSION: A validated risk score predicted risk of post-RRT death with more than 80% accuracy, helping to identify patients for whom targeted rescue care may improve survival.

To identify the factors that influence the recognizing and responding to adult patient deterioration in acute hospitals.

AIMS: To identify factors that influence recognition and response to adult patient deterioration in acute hospitals. DESIGN: A mixed-studies systematic review. DATA SOURCES: CINAHL, Medline, and Web of Science were searched for relevant literature published between 2007 - 2018. REVIEW METHODS: Studies were critically appraised, data extracted and thematically analysed. RESULTS: Thirteen papers met the inclusion criteria. Three main themes were identified: (a) Knowledge and understanding of clinical deterioration; (b) Organizational factors; managing deterioration and staffing levels; and (c) Communication; inter-professional relationships and professional-patient communication. CONCLUSION: Despite national guidelines, the review findings suggest that the recognition and response to adult patient deterioration in acute hospital settings is sub-optimal. A multitude of factors influencing the recognition and response to adult patient deterioration emerged from the findings. IMPACT: Patients are receiving sub-optimal care due to failure in recognizing and responding to patient deterioration in an appropriate and timely manner. Nurses lack knowledge and understanding of deterioration. Organizational factors contribute to inadequate care and communication among professionals was highlighted as challenging. The factors that influence the recognizing and responding to patient deterioration in acute hospitals are multi-faceted, however this review highlights immediate recommendations for professionals in the acute care setting.

Measuring the success of Medical Emergency Teams: potentially preventable deaths versus total cardiac arrest deaths. A single centre observational study.

BACKGROUND: Rapid response systems have been implemented with the aim of preventing patient deterioration, in-hospital cardiac arrests (IHCA) and related deaths. Not all 'unexpected deaths' are preventable, thus compromising the use of unexpected deaths as an outcome measure. AIMS: To assess temporal trends in potentially preventable deaths as a subset of total unexpected death rates over a 4-year period. METHODS: A single centre, cohort study of all unexpected deaths between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2013. Unexpected deaths were identified from the rapid response systems database and patients' case histories were reviewed to reclassify the deaths into one of three categories: potentially preventable: if earlier MET activation may have prevented death; missed not for resuscitation opportunity; and not preventable. Total bed days were obtained from the hospital's patient administration system. RESULTS: The rate of potentially preventable deaths decreased from 5.3 to 0.7 per 100 000 bed days (incident rate ratio (IRR) 0.53 (95% CI 0.31-0.90), P = 0.02). The rate of total unexpected deaths was unchanged (IRR 0.96 (0.80-1.16), P = 0.70), as were the rates of non-preventable deaths (IRR 1.06 (0.78-1.42), P = 0.72) and missed NFR deaths (IRR 1.1 (0.83-1.42), P = 0.56). CONCLUSION: The rate of potentially preventable deaths has decreased by 47% per year over a 4-year period without any change in the overall rate of unexpected deaths. Distinguishing between potentially preventable deaths in contrast to total unexpected deaths enables more targeted evaluation of rapid response systems.

Rapid response team calls to obstetric patients in a busy quaternary maternity hospital.

AIMS: There is limited published information regarding intensive care unit (ICU) led rapid response team (RRT) calls to obstetric patients. We examined the characteristics of RRT calls to obstetric patients at a tertiary teaching hospital. METHODS: Details of calls to pregnant and postpartum patients between October 2010 and June 2014 were obtained from the hospital RRT database. Each was retrospectively examined for data on patient demographics, call trigger, interventions and outcomes. Local obstetric-specific escalation practices (Code Pink/Green) for obstetrical concerns (not mandating maternal instability/involvement of the ICU team), were excluded. RESULTS: There were 106 RRT calls logged during 43 months, and 97 had data available for analysis. Women currently pregnant accounted for 33% of calls and postpartum women 67%, with nearly half of these occurring more than 24 h post-delivery. The most common reason (29% of calls) for calling the RRT was hypotension, followed by 'concern about patient' (21%) and decreased Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) (17%). An escalation in the environment of care occurred after 32% of calls, with approximately 11% of calls necessitating direct ICU admission. Twenty-three percent of all calls were to women who had an ICU admission during their hospital stay. Among the cohort who received an RRT call, there was one maternal and three neonatal deaths. CONCLUSION: At our institution generic RRT calls are called to both pregnant and postpartum women, and frequently result in an escalation in the care environment. Further study is required to understand better the specific needs of this important population.

Rapid response systems for paediatrics: Suggestions for optimal organization and training.

Resuscitation and cardiac arrest events in the paediatric population are rare occurrences. Improving outcomes from such events continues to be a difficult challenge. Rapid response systems and teams have been integrated into many hospitals in an effort to facilitate early identification and management of patients at risk for clinical deterioration. Optimizing education in the form of team training is a major component of successful team performance. Simulation-based team training, is a key educational supplement for existing standardized resuscitation courses. This position statement describes the evidence supporting rapid response systems and teams as well as simulation-based team training and provides recommendations for implementation in hospital care for paediatric patients.

The Simulation-Based Assessment of Pediatric Rapid Response Teams.

OBJECTIVE: To create scenarios of simulated decompensating pediatric patients to train pediatric rapid response teams (RRTs) and to determine whether the scenario scores provide a valid assessment of RRT performance with the hypothesis that RRTs led by intensivists-in-training would be better prepared to manage the scenarios than teams led by nurse practitioners. STUDY DESIGN: A set of 10 simulated scenarios was designed for the training and assessment of pediatric RRTs. Pediatric RRTs, comprising a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) registered nurse and respiratory therapist, led by a PICU intensivist-in-training or a pediatric nurse practitioner, managed 7 simulated acutely decompensating patients. Two raters evaluated the scenario performances and psychometric analyses of the scenarios were performed. RESULTS: The teams readily managed scenarios such as supraventricular tachycardia and opioid overdose but had difficulty with more complicated scenarios such as aortic coarctation or head injury. The management of any particular scenario was reasonably predictive of overall team performance. The teams led by the PICU intensivists-in-training outperformed the teams led by the pediatric nurse practitioners. CONCLUSIONS: Simulation provides a method for RRTs to develop decision-making skills in managing decompensating pediatric patients. The multiple scenario assessment provided a moderately reliable team score. The greater scores achieved by PICU intensivist-in-training-led teams provides some evidence to support the validity of the assessment.

Crisis checklists for in-hospital emergencies: expert consensus, simulation testing and recommendations for a template determined by a multi-institutional and multi-disciplinary learning collaborative.

BACKGROUND: 'Failure to rescue' of hospitalized patients with deteriorating physiology on general wards is caused by a complex array of organisational, technical and cultural failures including a lack of standardized team and individual expected responses and actions. The aim of this study using a learning collaborative method was to develop consensus recomendations on the utility and effectiveness of checklists as training and operational tools to assist in improving the skills of general ward staff on the effective rescue of patients with abnormal physiology. METHODS: A scoping study of the literature was followed by a multi-institutional and multi-disciplinary international learning collaborative. We sought to achieve a consensus on procedures and clinical simulation technology to determine the requirements, develop and test a safe using a checklist template that is rapidly accessible to assist in emergency management of common events for general ward use. RESULTS: Safety considerations about deteriorating patients were agreed upon and summarized. A consensus was achieved among an international group of experts on currently available checklist formats performing poorly in simulation testing as first responders in general ward clinical crises. The Crisis Checklist Collaborative ratified a consensus template for a general ward checklist that provides a list of issues for first responders to address (i.e. 'Check In'), a list of prompts regarding common omissions (i.e. 'Stop & Think'), and, a list of items required for the safe "handover" of patients that remain on the general ward (i.e. 'Check Out'). Simulation usability assessment of the template demonstrated feasibility for clinical management of deteriorating patients. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency checklists custom-designed for general ward patients have the potential to guide the treatment speed and reliability of responses for emergency management of patients with abnormal physiology while minimizing the risk of adverse events. Interventional trials are needed.

A measure of facilitators and barriers to rapid response team activation.

PURPOSE: Poor patient outcomes and increased costs may be associated with underutilization of RRTs. The aim of this study was to develop and test an instrument that identifies specific facilitators and barriers to rapid response team (RRT) activation. METHODS: Using an exploratory design, we surveyed a convenience sample of 250 registered nurses (RNs) employed in five Illinois hospitals. Participants completed the online RRT Facilitators and Barriers Survey (RRT-FBS), a 36 item survey developed by the researchers. The survey contains two sections, facilitators and barriers. Items in the facilitators subscales described nursing unit culture, RRT knowledge, and RRT member characteristics. Items in the barriers subscales described nursing unit culture, RRT education, and RRT member characteristics. Item analyses were conducted through exploratory factor analyses; internal consistency estimates were obtained. Descriptive statistics were conducted on the demographic data to describe sample and setting characteristics. RESULTS: The final sample consisted of 202 nurses from four hospitals. We conducted an item analysis and were able to reduce the survey to 30 items with a secondary analysis. The full scale alpha was 0.752. Cronbach's alphas for subscales ranged from 0.770-0.897. CONCLUSIONS: Facilitators and barriers may vary across institutions. This scale shows promise for identifying facilitators and barriers to nurses' use of rapid response teams and may provide a foundation for interventional studies promoting RRT utilization. In addition, more frequent education, emphasizing the RRT process, may be an effective method to maintain high rates of RRT activation and increase confidence.

The Impact of Implementation of an ICU Consult Service on Hospital-Wide Outcomes and ICU-Specific Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Rapid response teams (RRTs) were developed to promote assessment of and early intervention for clinically deteriorating hospitalized patients. Although the ideal composition of RRTs is not known, their implementation does require significant resources. OBJECTIVE: To test the effectiveness of a dedicated daytime/weekday intensive care unit (ICU) consult service without formal training of ward teams. METHODS: Pre- and postintervention study with weekends/nights during implementation period acting as a concurrent control. SETTING: An adult tertiary care university center in Montreal without an RRT. INTERVENTION: A daytime/weekday ICU consult service with a dedicated intensivist. RESULTS: Total hospital mortality rate did not differ between the control and the implementation period (6.65% vs 6.60%; P = .84). The hospital code blue rates also did not differ (1.21/1000 vs 1.14/1000 patient days; P = .58). In contrast, 30-day mortality of patients admitted to the ICU following an ICU consult decreased (39% vs 24% P = .01). Multivariate analysis confirmed this effect on 30-day mortality (odds ratio for implementation period: 0.53 [95% confidence interval: 0.33-0.85] P = .009). The 14-day ICU readmission rate was reduced with the intervention (5.1% vs 4.1%; P < .001). The effect on 30-day mortality and ICU readmissions were only present during daytime/weekdays. CONCLUSION: Implementation of an ICU consult service without any formal afferent limb training was associated with decreased mortality and 14-day readmission rates of patients admitted to the ICU. In contrast, hospital-wide mortality and code blue rates were unaffected.

Patient characteristics, interventions and outcomes of 1151 rapid response team activations in a tertiary hospital: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The characteristics of mature contemporary rapid response systems are unclear. AIM: To determine the patient characteristics, processes and outcomes, both in-hospital and post-discharge, of a well-established rapid response system in a tertiary adult hospital. METHODS: This is a prospective study of consecutive rapid response team (RRT) activations between 1 July and 25 November 2015. Variables included patient characteristics, timing, location and triggers of RRT activations, interventions undertaken, mortality and readmission status at 28 days post-discharge. RESULTS: A total of 1151 RRT activations was analysed (69.1 per 1000 admissions), involving 800 patients, of whom 81.5% were emergency admissions. A total of 351 (30.5%) activations comprised repeat activations for the same patient. Most activations (723; 62.8%) occurred out of hours, and 495 (43%) occurred within 48 h of admission. Hypotension, decreased level of consciousness and oxygen desaturation were the most common triggers. Advanced life support was undertaken in less than 7%; 198 (17.2%) responses led to transfer to higher-level care units. Acute resuscitation plans were noted for only 29.1% of RRT activations, with 80.3% stipulating supportive care only. A total of 103 (12.6%) patients died in hospital, equalling 14 deaths per 100 RRT activations. At 28 days, 150 (18.8%) patients had died, significantly more among those with multiple versus single RRT activations (24.9 vs 16.6%; odds ratio 1.66, 95% confidence interval 1.31-2.44; P = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Relatively few RRT activations are associated with acute resuscitation plans, and most interventions during RRT responses are low level. The high rate of post-RRT deaths and transfers to higher-level care units calls for the prospective identification of such patients in targeting appropriate care.

Elderly patients are at high risk of night-time admission to the intensive care unit following a rapid response team call.

Previous studies have shown that elderly patients (age ≥65 years) are less likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit following a rapid response team call and have high hospital mortality rates. This study has shown that elderly patients have a significantly higher probability of being admitted to an intensive care unit following a rapid response team call at night than during the day. However, at no time are they at greater risk than younger patients of incomplete vital sign recording, a failure to escalate care for acute deterioration or mortality.