Efficacy and safety of streptozocin-based chemotherapy for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in Japanese clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Streptozocin has been used to treat neuroendocrine tumors in Europe and the USA; however, its actual status in Japan has not been fully clarified owing to the rarity of this disease and the relatively recent approval of streptozocin in Japan. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 53 patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors who were treated with streptozocin-based chemotherapy at two Japanese hospitals between January 2004 and June 2023. RESULTS: The overall response and disease control rates were 27.7 and 74.5%, respectively, and the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 7.1 and 20.3 months, respectively. Performance status ≥1 showed a significant negative correlation with progression-free survival, and performance status ≥1 and liver tumor burden ≥25% showed a significant negative correlation with overall survival. No significant differences were observed in the treatment response between pancreatic and gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors. No treatment-related serious adverse events were observed; however, 87.7% of patients expressed a decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate, which negatively correlated with the duration of streptozocin treatment (r = 0.43, P = 0.0020). In the streptozocin re-administration group (n = 5), no differences were found in efficacy between the initial and second streptozocin treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Although streptozocin is a safe, streptozocin-induced renal dysfunction is a dilemma in streptozocin responders. Streptozocin may benefit patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, especially those with a good performance status; however, in some cases, planned streptozocin withdrawal or switching to other drugs should be considered.

Re-administration of platinum-based chemotherapy for recurrent endometrial cancer: an ancillary analysis of the SGSG-012/GOTIC-004/Intergroup study.

BACKGROUND: We previously demonstrated the applicability of the concept of "platinum sensitivity" in recurrent endometrial cancer. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors have been widely incorporated into endometrial cancer treatment, the debate continues regarding treatment options in patients with recurrent endometrial cancer who have previously received platinum-based chemotherapy. In this study, we assessed the duration of response to secondary platinum-based treatment using pooled data from the SGSG-012/GOTIC-004/Intergroup study. METHODS: Among the 279 participants in the SGSG-012/GOTIC-004/Intergroup study wherein platinum-based chemotherapy was re-administered for managing recurrent endometrial cancer between January 2005 and December 2009, 130 (47%) responded to chemotherapy. We compared the relationship between platinum-free interval and duration of secondary platinum-based treatment using pooled data. RESULTS: In 40 patients (31%), the duration of response to secondary platinum-based treatment exceeded the platinum-free interval. The duration of response to secondary platinum-based treatment exceeded 12 months in 51 patients (39%) [platinum-free interval: < 12 months, 14/48 (29%); 12-23 months, 18/43 (42%); 24-35 months, 8/19 (42%); ≥ 36 months, 11/20 (55%)]. In particular, in eight patients (6%), the duration of response to secondary platinum-based treatment exceeded 36 months [platinum-free interval: < 12 months, 3/48 (6%); 12-23 months, 0/19 (0%); 24-35 months, 2/19 (11%); ≥ 36 months, 3/20 (15%)]. CONCLUSIONS: Re-administration of platinum-based chemotherapy for recurrent endometrial cancer may result in a long-term response exceeding the platinum-free interval in some patients. Even in the current situation, where immune checkpoint inhibitors have been introduced, re-administration of platinum-based chemotherapy is worth considering.

Successful liver transduction by re-administration of different adeno-associated virus vector serotypes in mice.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous administration of adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors is a promising gene therapy approach for monogenic diseases. However, re-administration of the same AAV serotype is impossible because of the induction of anti-AAV neutralizing antibodies (NAbs). Here, we examined the feasibility of re-administrating AAV vector serotypes different from the initial AAV vector serotype. METHODS: Liver-targeting AAV3B, AAV5, and AAV8 vectors were intravenously injected in C57BL/6 mice, and the emergence of NAbs and the transduction efficacy following re-administration were evaluated. RESULTS: For all serotypes, re-administration of the same serotype was not possible. Although the highest neutralizing activity of NAb was induced by AAV5, anti-AAV5 NAbs did not react with other serotypes, resulting in successful re-administration with the other serotypes. AAV5 re-administration was also successful in all mice treated with AAV3B and AAV8. Effective secondary administration of AAV3B and AAV8 was observed in most mice initially administrated AAV8 and AAV3B, respectively. However, few mice developed NAbs cross-reacting with the other serotypes, especially those with close sequence homology. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, AAV vector administration induced NAbs relatively specific to the administrated serotype. Secondary administration of AAVs targeting liver transduction could be successfully achieved by switching AAV serotypes in mice.

EGFR-TKI re-administration after osimertinib failure in T790M mutation loss cases with re-biopsy.

Data on the re-administration of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) after osimertinib failure in patients with T790M-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is limited. EGFR-TKI re-administration efficacy may vary between patients with T790M loss and those with T790M persistent with re-biopsy after osimertinib treatment. Patients who received EGFR-TKI re-administration (gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, dacomitinib, and osimertinib) after osimertinib failure were identified from our database. T790M mutation status before EGFR-TKI re-administration was analyzed via repeat biopsy. We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of EGFR-TKI re-administration, especially differences according to the T790M mutation status, via repeat biopsy. Until June 2020, 28 patients received EGFR-TKI re-administration and 17 underwent repeat biopsy after osimertinib failure. Patients were divided into three groups, including the T790M loss group, where active mutation persisted and T790M was lost (13/17); T790M remaining group, where both the active mutation and T790M persisted (3/17); and active mutation loss group where both the active mutation and T790M were lost (1/17). The overall response rate (ORR) of EGFR-TKI re-administration in the T790M loss group was 31% and the disease control rate (DCR) was 54%, which were higher than the ORR of 21% and DCR of 43% in the entire patient population. ORR and DCR of the not re-biopsy group were low (9% and 27%, respectively). The therapeutic effect of EGFR-TKI re-administration in patients with T790M-positive NSCLC after osimertinib failure is limited. EGFR-TKI re-administration may be considered in cases of T790M loss after repeat biopsy.

A novel osimertinib-resistant human lung adenocarcinoma cell line harbouring mutant EGFR and activated IGF1R.

OBJECTIVE: A third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), osimertinib, is the standard treatment for patients with non-small cell lung cancer harbouring mutant EGFR. Unfortunately, these patients inevitably acquire resistance to EGFR-TKI therapies, including osimertinib. However, the mechanism associated with this resistance remains unclear. METHODS: A 63-year-old Japanese female with lung adenocarcinoma underwent right upper lobectomy (pT1bN2M0 pStage IIIA, EGFR Ex21 L858R). She manifested post-operative tumour recurrence with multiple lung metastases 8 months later and began gefitinib treatment. The lung lesions re-grew 15 months later, and EGFR T790M mutation was detected in the lung metastasis re-biopsy. She was administered osimertinib; however, it relapsed with pleural effusion 16 months later. We isolated cells from the osimertinib-resistant pleural effusion to establish a novel cell line, ABC-31. RESULTS: Although the EGFR L858R mutation was detected in ABC-31 cells, the T790M mutation was lost. ABC-31 cells were resistant to EGFR-TKIs, including osimertinib. Phospho-receptor tyrosine kinase array revealed activation of the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R), whereas overexpression of the IGF1R ligand, IGF2, induced IGF1R activation in ABC-31 cells. Combination therapy using EGFR-TKIs and IGF1R inhibitor acted synergistically in vitro. She was re-administered osimertinib since EGFR-TKIs and IGF1R inhibitor combination therapy was impossible in clinical practice. This had a slight and short-lived effect. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, we have successfully established a new osimertinib-resistant lung adenocarcinoma cell line with activated IGF1R. These ABC-31 cells will help develop novel therapeutic strategies for patients with lung adenocarcinoma resistant to specific treatment via IGF1R activation.

Effectiveness and Safety of EGFR-TKI Rechallenge Treatment in Elderly Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Harboring Drug-Sensitive EGFR Mutations.

Background and Objectives: Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are effective first-line chemotherapeutic agents for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring drug-sensitive EGFR mutations. However, the effectiveness of EGFR-TKI rechallenge after first-line EGFR-TKI treatment is not sufficient in elderly patients (over 75 years of age) harboring drug-sensitive EGFR mutations. Therefore, we investigated the effectiveness and safety of EGFR-TKI rechallenge after first-line EGFR-TKI treatment in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC harboring drug-sensitive EGFR mutations. Materials and Methods: Between April 2008 and December 2015, we analyzed 78 elderly patients with advanced NSCLC harboring drug-sensitive EGFR mutations with first-line EGFR-TKI treatment at four Japanese institutions. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical effectiveness and safety profiles of EGFR-TKI rechallenge after first-line EGFR-TKI treatment in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC harboring drug-sensitive EGFR mutations (exon 19 deletion/exon 21 L858R mutation). Results: Twenty-two patients in the cohort were rechallenged with EGFR-TKI. The median age was 79.5 years (range 75-87 years). Despite the fact that it was a retrospective analysis, even with EGFR-TKI rechallenge treatment the response rate was 23%, progression-free survival was 5.3 months, and overall survival was 14.4 months. Common adverse events included rash acneiform, paronychia, diarrhea, and anorexia. There were no treatment-related deaths. Due to the occurrence of adverse events of grade 2 or more, dose reduction was performed in 15 (68.2%) of 22 cases. Conclusions: EGFR-TKI rechallenge treatment after first-line EGFR-TKI treatment in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC harboring drug-sensitive EGFR mutations was one of the limited, safe and effective treatment options for elderly EGFR-positive lung cancer patients.

A maintained absolute lymphocyte count predicts the overall survival benefit from eribulin therapy, including eribulin re-administration, in HER2-negative advanced breast cancer patients: a single-institutional experience.

PURPOSE: Eribulin methylate (eribulin) improved the overall survival (OS) of HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (HER2-ABC) patients; however, the mechanism underlying the OS improvement has not been clarified. Several reports suggest that eribulin promotes antitumor immunity via tumor micro-environment conditioning. Recently, a maintained baseline lymphocyte count was proposed as predictive marker for eribulin therapy in HER2-ABC patients; however, no associations with the OS have been noted. We retrospectively investigated the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) in HER2-ABC patients receiving eribulin and assessed the utility of eribulin re-administration for further OS improvement. METHODS: HER2-ABC patients who received eribulin therapy at Shizuoka Cancer Center between November 2011 and December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 144 HER2-ABC (108 estrogen receptor-positive [ER+], 36 ER-) patients were identified, and 32 patients (28 ER+ , 4 ER-) were re-administered with eribulin. In the ER+ subgroup, a multivariate analysis showed that an ALC ≥ 1000/µL and re-administration were significantly associated with the OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.503; P = 0.034 and HR 0.366; P < 0.0001, respectively), and an ALC ≥ 1000/µL was also identified as the only predictive factor for re-administration (HR 0.329; P = 0.033). In contrast, a multivariate analysis in the ER- subgroup identified no predictive markers. CONCLUSION: In HER2-ER + ABC patients, ALC was identified as a predictive marker for eribulin therapy, and the re-administration of eribulin is considered a valid therapeutic option for further improvement of the OS.

Successful Repeated Hepatic Gene Delivery in Mice and Non-human Primates Achieved by Sequential Administration of AAV5ch and AAV1.

In the gene therapy field, re-administration of adeno-associated virus (AAV) is an important topic because a decrease in therapeutic protein expression might occur over time. However, an efficient re-administration with the same AAV serotype is impossible due to serotype-specific, anti-AAV neutralizing antibodies (NABs) that are produced after initial AAV treatment. To address this issue, we explored the feasibility of using chimeric AAV serotype 5 (AAV5ch) and AAV1 for repeated liver-targeted gene delivery. To develop a relevant model, we immunized animals with a high dose of AAV5ch-human secreted embryonic alkaline phosphatase (hSEAP) that generates high levels of anti-AAV5ch NAB. Secondary liver transduction with the same dose of AAV1-human factor IX (hFIX) in the presence of high levels of anti-AAV5ch NAB proved to be successful because expression/activity of both reporter transgenes was observed. This is the first time that two different transgenes are shown to be produced by non-human primate (NHP) liver after sequential administration of clinically relevant doses of both AAV5ch and AAV1. The levels of transgene proteins achieved after delivery with AAV5ch and AAV1 illustrate the possibility of both serotypes for liver targeting. Furthermore, transgene DNA and RNA biodistribution patterns provided insight into the potential cause of decrease or loss of transgene protein expression over time in NHPs.

Approach to hypersensitivity reactions from intravenous iron preparations.

Hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to intravenous iron preparations (IVIPs) are well known. With newer preparations, HSRs have become rarer; however, severe reactions may still occur. We retrospectively reviewed records of patients evaluated for HSRs to IVIPs, to determine the safety of controlled re-administration (CRA). Allergological work-up included a detailed history, skin prick tests (SPTs) with IVIP, and basophil activation tests (BATs) in some patients. CRA with an IVIP was carried out if indicated. Thirty-one patients with mild to severe reactions were evaluated. SPTs and BATs were negative in all patients tested. Eighteen CRAs in 15 patients were performed. Twelve patients tolerated the procedure, including three with a previous grade IV HSR. Two developed urticaria and one developed urticaria and dyspnea. The pathophysiology of HSRs to IVIPs remains currently unclear. SPTs and BATs provided no additional information. However, in appropriate situations, CRA under surveillance can be safely performed in most patients.