[Safety and short-term effectiveness of blinatumomab in the treatment of childhood relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia]. / 贝林妥欧单抗治疗儿童复发/éš¾æ²»æ€¥æ€§æ·‹å·´ç»†èƒžç™½è¡€ç— çš„å®‰å ¨æ€§åŠè¿‘æœŸç–—æ•ˆåˆ†æž.

OBJECTIVES: To study the safety and short-term effectiveness of blinatumomab in the treatment of childhood relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R-ALL). METHODS: Six children with R/R-ALL who received blinatumomab treatment from August 2021 to August 2022 were included as subjects, and a retrospective analysis was performed for their clinical data. RESULTS: Among the six children, there were three boys and three girls, with a median age of 10.5 (5.0-13.0) years at the time of inclusion. Of all six children, one had refractory ALL and did not achieve remission after several times of chemotherapy, and 5 relapsed for the first time, with a median time of 30 (9-60) months from diagnosis to relapse. Minimal residual disease (MRD) before treatment was 15.50% (0.08%-78.30%). Three children achieved complete remission after treatment, among whom two had negative conversion of MRD. Five children had cytokine release syndrome (CRS), among whom 3 had grade 1 CRS and 2 had grade 2 CRS. Four children were bridged to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, with a median interval of 50 (40-70) days from blinatumomab treatment to transplantation. The six children were followed up for a median time of 170 days, and the results showed an overall survival rate of 41.7% (95%CI: 5.6%-76.7%) and a median survival time of 126 (95%CI: 53-199) days. CONCLUSIONS: Blinatumomab has good short-term safety and effectiveness in the treatment of childhood R/R-ALL, and its long-term effectiveness needs to be confirmed by studies with a larger sample size.

Blinatumomab in Practice.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a rare hematologic neoplasm in adults, with most cases defined by pathology related to abnormal B cell proliferation known as B-cell ALL. The course is challenging, with less-than-optimal survival outcomes, even with aggressive multiagent chemotherapy and consideration for stem cell transplantation. Novel therapies focused on targetable pathways are being investigated to improve outcomes while simultaneously decreasing toxicity. In our review, we aim to evaluate the utilization of blinatumomab in B-cell ALL and provide insight on how this guides our management. RECENT FINDINGS: Blinatumomab is a bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) immunotherapy that neutralizes malignant cells by instigating CD3-positive T cells to target CD19-positive B cells. However, this therapy targets both malignant and non-malignant lymphocytes with potentially severe side effects such as cytokine release syndrome or neurotoxicity. Evidence evaluating utilization in the relapsed or refractory setting has been most supported; however, newer trials have also indicated improved survival in the frontline treatment of B-cell ALL. As this therapy is relatively new, the treatment team may include members who are less experienced with the typical treatment course and drug mechanics. This review synthesized available data investigating the effectiveness of blinatumomab effectiveness and its adverse events in addition to providing guidance on safe administration methods utilizing a multidisciplinary healthcare team. When care is coordinated in these settings, serious side effects can be recognized early, allowing for necessary intervention leading to improved quality of life and overall survival. Future research will continue to evaluate blinatumomab in different lines of therapy and expand its way into community settings.

Corrigendum: Impact of disease burden and late loss of B cell aplasia on the risk of relapse after CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T Cell (Tisagenlecleucel) infusion in pediatric and young adult patients with relapse/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: role of B-cell monitoring.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1280580.].

Comparison of blinatumomab and CAR T-cell therapy in relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the benefits and risks of patients with refractory or relapsed acute lymphocytic leukemia (R/R ALL) treated with anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and blinatumomab. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies. RESULTS: The pooled complete remission (CR) rate and minimal residual disease (MRD) negative rate were 48%, 31% for blinatumomab, and 86% and 80% for CAR T-cell therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The CAR T-cell therapy group exhibited a higher likelihood of CR rate than the blinatumomab group in every analysis regardless of adjustment subgroups. CAR T-cell therapy was associated with a significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) compared with blinatumomab (2-year OS 55% vs 25%; 2-year RFS 40% vs 22%). CAR T-cell therapy was more effective for achieving CR and bridging to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) than blinatumomab (2-year OS 75% vs. 57%). An emerging role for blinatumomab is as a bridging agent pre-SCT, and for patients who achieve an MRD-negative state pre-SCT, post-SCT outcomes are expected to be the same as CAR-T. For adverse effects (AEs), blinatumomab was associated with a lower rate of grade ≥3 hematological toxicity, CRS, and neurological events.

X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein represents a promising therapeutic target for relapsed/refractory ALL.

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) represents the most frequent malignancy in children, and relapse/refractory (r/r) disease is difficult to treat, both in children and adults. In search for novel treatment options against r/r ALL, we studied inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAP) and Smac mimetics (SM). SM-sensitized r/r ALL cells towards conventional chemotherapy, even upon resistance against SM alone. The combination of SM and chemotherapy-induced cell death via caspases and PARP, but independent from cIAP-1/2, RIPK1, TNFα or NF-κB. Instead, XIAP was identified to mediate SM effects. Molecular manipulation of XIAP in vivo using microRNA-30 flanked shRNA expression in cell lines and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of r/r ALL mimicked SM effects and intermediate XIAP knockdown-sensitized r/r ALL cells towards chemotherapy-induced apoptosis. Interestingly, upon strong XIAP knockdown, PDX r/r ALL cells were outcompeted in vivo, even in the absence of chemotherapy. Our results indicate a yet unknown essential function of XIAP in r/r ALL and reveal XIAP as a promising therapeutic target for r/r ALL.

Impact of disease burden and late loss of B cell aplasia on the risk of relapse after CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T Cell (Tisagenlecleucel) infusion in pediatric and young adult patients with relapse/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: role of B-cell monitoring.

Introduction: Loss of B-cell aplasia (BCA) is a well-known marker of functional loss of CD19 CAR-T. Most relapses and loss of BCA occur in the first months after CD19 CAR-T infusion. In addition, high tumor burden (HTB) has shown to have a strong impact on relapse, especially in CD19-negative. However, little is known about the impact of late loss of BCA or the relationship between BCA and pre-infusion tumor burden in patients infused with tisagenlecleucel for relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Therefore, the optimal management of patients with loss of BCA is yet to be defined. Methods: We conducted a Spanish, multicentre, retrospective study in patients infused with tisagenlecleucel after marketing authorization. A total of 73 consecutively treated patients were evaluated. Results: Prior to infusion, 39 patients had HTB (≥ 5% bone marrow blasts) whereas 34 had a low tumor burden (LTB) (<5% blasts). Complete remission was achieved in 90.4% of patients, of whom 59% relapsed. HTB was associated with inferior outcomes, with a 12-month EFS of 19.3% compared to 67.2% in patients with LTB (p<0.001) with a median follow-up of 13.5 months (95% CI 12.4 - 16.2). In the HTB subgroup relapses were mainly CD19-negative (72%) whereas in the LTB subgroup they were mainly CD19-positive (71%) (p=0.017). In the LTB group, all CD19-positive relapses were preceded by loss of BCA whereas only 57% (4/7) of HTB patients experienced CD19-positive relapse. We found a positive correlation between loss of BCA and CD19-positive relapse (R-squared: 74) which persisted beyond six months post-infusion. We also explored B-cell recovery over time using two different definitions of loss of BCA and found a few discrepancies. Interestingly, transient immature B-cell recovery followed by BCA was observed in two pediatric patients. In conclusion, HTB has an unfavorable impact on EFS and allo-SCT might be considered in all patients with HTB, regardless of BCA. In patients with LTB, loss of BCA preceded all CD19-positive relapses. CD19-positive relapse was also frequent in patients who lost BCA beyond six months post-infusion. Therefore, these patients are still at significant risk for relapse and close MRD monitoring and/or therapeutic interventions should be considered.

Efficacy and safety of blinatumomab in children with relapsed/refractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objectives: Several clinical trials have been conducted to evaluate the effects of blinatumomab in childhood B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). We conducted this meta-analysis to validate the efficacy and safety of blinatumomab in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory B-ALL (R/R B-ALL). Methods: We searched and investigated all relevant studies in the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. The primary outcomes were complete response (CR), overall survival (OS), event free survival (EFS), minimal residual disease (MRD) response, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and were calculated separately for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and single-arm studies. The secondary end points were adverse effects (AEs) and the relapse rate. The Cochrane, bias assessment tool, was used to assess the risk of bias in RCTs. The methodological quality of single-arm studies was assessed using the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) tool. Results: The meta-analysis included two RCTs and 10 single-arm studies, including 652 patients in total. Our study showed that in the single-arm studies, the combined CR rate was 0.56 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.45 -0.68), the odds ratios (ORs) of OS was 0.43 (95% CI 0.32 -0.54), the EFS rate was 0.30 (95% CI: 0.20 -0.40), the MRD response was 0.51 (95% CI: 0.34 -0.68), allo-HSCT rate was 0.62 (95% CI: 0.50 -.74), the AE rate was 0.65 (95% CI: 0.54 -0.76) and the relapse rate was 0.32 (95% CI: 0.27 -0.38). In the RCTs, the blinatumomab-treated group compared with the chemotherapy group had a combined OS rate of 0.12 (95% CI: 0.05 -0.19) and an EFS rate of 2.16 (95% CI: 1.54 -3.03). The pooled MRD response rate was 4.71 (95% CI:2.84 -7.81), allo-HSCT was 3.24 (95% CI: 1.96 -5.35), the AE rate was 0.31 (95% CI: 0.16 -0.60), and the relapse rate was 0 .69 (95% CI: 0.43 -1.09). Conclusion: According to this meta-analysis, blinatumomab shows potent therapeutic efficacy and limited AEs in children with R/R B- ALL. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022361914.

Immunotherapeutic options for management of relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: how to select newly approved agents?

Recently, immunotherapeutic agents such as inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO), blinatumomab (BLIN), and tisagenlecleucel (TISA) have been approved for treatment of relapsed or refractory (R/R) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). No head to head trials have compared these agents. Thus, various factors influence the decision to choose an appropriate treatment for R/R ALL. INO may be preferred in patients with high tumor burden; BLIN is preferred in patients with low tumor burden or to eradicate minimal residual disease (MRD). Both INO and BLIN, compared to standard chemotherapy, increase the probability of receiving subsequent hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). TISA, approved for patients ≤25 years of age, is effective regardless of tumor burden or prior receipt of HSCT and can be used as a definite treatment in some patients. Further studies comparing the efficacy, safety, and other outcomes related to different immunotherapeutic options in combination with other treatment modalities and among themselves are needed.

Pre-transplant MRD negativity predicts favorable outcomes of CAR-T therapy followed by haploidentical HSCT for relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a multi-center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Consolidative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a controversial option for patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia after chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy. We performed a multicenter retrospective study to assess whether patients can benefit from haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after CAR-T therapy. METHODS: A total of 122 patients after CAR-T therapy were enrolled, including 67 patients without subsequent transplantation (non-transplant group) and 55 patients with subsequent haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (transplant group). Long-term outcome was assessed, as was its association with baseline patient characteristics. RESULTS: Compared with the non-transplant group, transplantation recipients had a higher 2-year overall survival (OS; 77.0% versus 36.4%; P < 0.001) and leukemia-free survival (LFS; 65.6% versus 32.8%; P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that minimal residual disease (MRD) positivity at transplantation is an independent factor associated with poor LFS (P = 0.005), OS (P = 0.035), and high cumulative incidence rate of relapse (P = 0.045). Pre-transplant MRD-negative recipients (MRD- group) had a lower cumulative incidence of relapse (17.3%) than those in the non-transplant group (67.2%; P < 0.001) and pre-transplant MRD-positive recipients (MRD+ group) (65.8%; P = 0.006). The cumulative incidence of relapse in MRD+ and non-transplant groups did not differ significantly (P = 0.139). The 2-year LFS in the non-transplant, MRD+, and MRD- groups was 32.8%, 27.6%, and 76.1%, respectively. The MRD- group had a higher LFS than the non-transplantation group (P < 0.001) and MRD+ group (P = 0.007), whereas the LFS in the MRD+ and non-transplant groups did not differ significantly (P = 0.305). The 2-year OS of the MRD- group was higher than that of the non-transplant group (83.3% versus 36.4%; P < 0.001) but did not differ from that of the MRD+ group (83.3% versus 62.7%; P = 0.069). The OS in the non-transplant and MRD+ groups did not differ significantly (P = 0.231). CONCLUSION: Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with pre-transplant MRD negativity after CAR-T therapy could greatly improve LFS and OS in patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered in the Chinese clinical trial registry (ChiCTR1900023957).

Impact of blinatumomab on patient outcomes in relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: evidence to date.

Relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is associated with a poor prognosis in both children and adults. Traditionally, there were limited options for salvage therapy, which consisted mostly of conventional chemotherapy. However, in the past 5 years, novel agents have changed our treatment strategies in this population. Blinatumomab, a bispecific CD19 directed CD3 T-cell engager, has shown to be effective in both minimal residual disease and R/R B-cell ALL. In R/R B-cell ALL, blinatumomab was associated with an improved median overall survival of 7.7 months vs 4.0 months with traditional chemotherapy (HR for death, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55-0.93; P=0.01). It has distinctive side effects as compared to chemotherapy, specifically cytokine release syndrome and neurological toxicities. When compared to standard of care chemotherapy, patients have higher quality of life scores and less financial burden. Using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, blinatumomab-treated patients fared better and had a longer time to deterioration or death (global health status/quality of life subscale: HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.48-0.92; P=0.009) compared to conventional chemotherapy. Using an incremental cost effective ratio threshold of US$150,000 per quality adjusted life year, blinatumomab was determined to be more cost effective compared to chemotherapy with a probability of 73.7%. This review summarizes the current and future data with blinatumomab in R/R B-cell ALL in the adult and pediatric population.