Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 409
Filtrar
Más filtros

Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 31(6): 3813-3818, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38245648

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Approximately 4-9% of patients have a tumor-positive resection margin after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and esophagectomy. Although it is associated with decreased survival, Western guidelines do not recommend adjuvant treatment. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the proportion of patients who received adjuvant therapy, and to evaluate overall survival (OS) after esophagectomy in patients with a tumor-positive resection margin. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with resectable (cT2-4a/cTxN0-3/NxM0) esophageal cancer between 2015 and 2022, and treated with nCRT followed by irradical esophagectomy, were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a tumor-positive resection margin who started adjuvant treatment ≤16 weeks after esophagectomy, including chemotherapy/radiotherapy, immunotherapy, or targeted therapy. OS was calculated from the date of surgery until the date of death or last day of follow-up. RESULTS: Overall, 376 patients were included in our study, of whom 357 were treated with nCRT. Of these 357 patients, 98.3% had a microscopically irradical resection and 1.7% had a macroscopically irradical resection. Approximately 72.3% of tumors showed a partial response (Mandard 2-3) and 11.8% showed little/no pathological response (Mandard 4-5) to nCRT. One of 357 patients underwent adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and 39 patients (61%) underwent adjuvant immunotherapy (nivolumab). The median and 5-year OS rate of all patients was 16.4 months (95% confidence interval 13.1-19.8) and 21%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Real-world population-level data showed that no patients with a tumor-positive resection margin underwent adjuvant therapy following nCRT and esophagectomy prior to 2021. Interestingly, 61% of patients were treated with adjuvant nivolumab in 2021-2022. OS after irradical esophagectomy is poor and long-term data will explore the added value of nivolumab.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Esofagectomía , Márgenes de Escisión , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Humanos , Esofagectomía/mortalidad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Masculino , Femenino , Terapia Neoadyuvante/mortalidad , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tasa de Supervivencia , Estudios de Seguimiento , Pronóstico , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/mortalidad , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 31(10): 6900-6908, 2024 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38969858

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The risk for recurrence in patients with distal gastric cancer can be reduced by surgical radicality. However, dispute exists about the value of the proposed minimum proximal margin distance (PMD). Here, we assess the prognostic value of the safety distance between the proximal resection margin and the tumor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a single-center cohort study of patients undergoing distal gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma (2001-2021). Cohorts were defined by adequacy of the PMD according to the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines (≥ 5 cm for intestinal and ≥ 8 cm for diffuse Laurén's subtypes). Overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP) were assessed by log-rank and multivariable Cox-regression analyses. RESULTS: Of 176 patients, 70 (39.8%) had a sufficient PMD. An adequate PMD was associated with cancer of the intestinal subtype (67% vs. 45%, p = 0.010). Estimated 5-year survival was 63% [95% confidence interval (CI) 51-78] and 62% (95% CI 53-73) for adequate and inadequate PMD, respectively. Overall, an adequate PMD was not prognostic for OS (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.48-1.38) in the multivariable analysis. However, in patients with diffuse subtype, an adequate PMD was associated with improved oncological outcomes (median OS not reached versus 131 months, p = 0.038, median TTP not reached versus 88.0 months, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Patients with diffuse gastric cancer are at greater risk to undergo resection with an inadequate PMD, which in those patients is associated with worse oncological outcomes. For the intestinal subtype, there was no prognostic association with PMD, indicating that a distal gastrectomy with partial preservation of the gastric function may also be feasible in the setting where an extensive PMD is not achievable.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Gastrectomía , Márgenes de Escisión , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Gastrectomía/métodos , Gastrectomía/mortalidad , Masculino , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Femenino , Pronóstico , Tasa de Supervivencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estudios de Seguimiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía
3.
Pancreatology ; 2024 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39379246

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The prognostic impact of additional resection based on intraoperative frozen section analysis (FSA) of the pancreatic transection margin in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognosis based on the results of the first FSA of the pancreatic transection margin (1st FSA) and the clinical significance of additional resection. METHODS: Patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for PDAC from 2000 to 2020 at a single center were included. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on the 1stFSA. Survival and prognostic factors were analyzed according to the 1stFSA. RESULTS: A total of 311 patients were included in this study. The 1stFSA was negative in 272 patients (1stFSA-R0) and positive in 39 patients [carcinoma in situ (1stFSA-CIS), 21 patients; invasive carcinoma (1stFSA-IC), 18 patients]. Additional resections were performed on 37 patients [1stFSA-CIS, 20 patients; 1stFSA-IC, 17 patients], and R0 resection was achieved in 34 patients intraoperatively. Comparing median survival time to 1stFSA-R0 (36.4 months), 1stFSA-CIS was comparable (27.8 months, p = 0.276), although 1stFSA-IC was significantly worse (18.8 months, p = 0.001). On multivariate analysis, 1stFSA-IC was an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio 2.68, 95 % confidence interval 1.16-6.17, p = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: 1stFSA-CIS and 1stFSA-R0 had similar OS, implying that additional resection may be acceptable for 1stFSA-CIS. 1stFSA-IC was still an independent prognostic factor based on additional resection, and the prognostic significance of additional resection is uncertain for 1stFSA-IC.

4.
Pancreatology ; 2024 Sep 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39256133

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin (CRM) or circumferential surface (CS) in pancreatic head cancer is controversial. We investigated the survival outcomes according to CRM or CS involvement in pancreatoduodenectomy specimens of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: A total of 102 pancreatoduodenectomy specimens after upfront surgery for PDAC between 2014 and 2018 were prospectively collected. The superior mesenteric vein/portal vein or superior mesenteric artery margins were classified as CRM, and the anterior or posterior surfaces as CS. Survival outcomes and recurrence were compared according to the CRM/CS status, which was categorized into R10mm, R11mm, and R0 (≥1 mm) by the 0 and 1 mm rules. RESULTS: For CRM, R10mm had significantly lower overall survival (OS) (P < 0.001) and disease-free survival (P < 0.001) rates than R11mm and R0, with no difference between R11mm and R0. For CS, R0 had a significantly higher OS rate (P < 0.001) than R10mm and R11mm, with no difference between R10mm and R11mm. In multivariable analysis, R10mm CRM was an independent risk factor for OS (hazard ratio 2.410, P = 0.003) and DFS (hazard ratio 5.019, P < 0.001). When CRM/CS were analyzed separately, only the R10mm superior mesenteric artery margin was significantly associated with local recurrence (P = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that CRM involvement defined by the 0 mm rule is more appropriate than the 1 mm rule for predicting survival outcomes, but CS involvement defined by the 0 or 1 mm rules is not prognostically significant.

5.
Eur Radiol ; 2024 Sep 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39235653

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To develop an MRI-based score that enables individualized predictions of the survival benefit of wide over narrow resection margins. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center retrospective study (December 2011 to May 2022) included consecutive patients who underwent curative-intent resection for single Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) 0/A HCC and preoperative contrast-enhanced MRI. In patients with narrow resection margins, preoperative demographic, laboratory, and MRI variables independently associated with early recurrence-free survival (RFS) were identified using Cox regression analyses, which were employed to develop a predictive score (named "MARGIN"). Survival outcomes were compared between wide and narrow resection margins in a propensity-score matched cohort for the score-stratified low- and high-risk groups, respectively. RESULTS: Four hundred nineteen patients (median age, 54 years; 361 men) were included, 282 (67.3%) undergoing narrow resection margins. In patients with narrow resection margins, age, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) > 400 ng/mL, protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II (PIVKA-II) > 200 mAU/mL, radiological involvement of liver capsule, and infiltrative appearance were associated with early RFS (p values, 0.002-0.04) and formed the MARGIN score with a testing dataset C-index of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.65-0.84). In the matched cohort, wide resection margin was associated with improved early RFS rate for the high-risk group (MARGIN score ≥ - 1.3; 71.1% vs 41.0%; p = 0.02), but not for the low-risk group (MARGIN score < - 1.3; 79.7% vs 76.1%; p = 0.36). CONCLUSION: In patients with single BCLC 0/A HCC, the MARGIN score may serve as promising decision-making to indicate the need for wide resection margins. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The MARGIN score has the potential to identify patients who would benefit more from wide resection margins than narrow resection margins, improving the postoperative survival of patients with single BCLC 0/A hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). KEY POINTS: Age, AFP, PIVKA-II, radiological involvement of liver capsule, and infiltrative appearance were associated with early RFS and formed the MARGIN score. The MARGIN score achieved a testing dataset C-index of 0.75. Wide resection margins were associated with improved early RFS for the high-risk group, but not for the low-risk group.

6.
J Surg Oncol ; 2024 Aug 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39183490

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study investigates the impact of margin status after colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) resection on outcomes of patients after neoadjuvant treatment versus those who underwent upfront resection. METHODS: An international collaborative database of CLM patients who underwent surgical resection was used. Proportional hazard regression models were created for single and multivariable models to assess the relationship between independent measures and median overall survival (mOS). RESULTS: R1 was associated with worse OS in the neoadjuvant group (mOS: 51.8 m for R0 vs. 26.0 m for R1; HR: 2.18). In the patients who underwent upfront surgery, R1 was not associated with OS. (mOS: 46.7 m for R0 vs. 42.6 m for R1). When patients with R1 in each group were stratified by adjuvant treatment, there was no significant difference in the neoadjuvant group, while in the upfront surgery group with R1, adjuvant treatment was associated with significant improvement in OS (mOS: 42.6 m for adjuvant vs. 25.0 m for no adjuvant treatment; HR: 0.21). CONCLUSION: R1 is associated with worse outcomes in the patients who receive neoadjuvant treatment with no significant improvement with the addition of adjuvant therapy, likely representing an aggressive tumor biology. R1 did not impact OS in patients with upfront surgery who received postoperative chemotherapy.

7.
J Surg Oncol ; 129(7): 1311-1324, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38470556

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We aimed to examine the effect of preoperative three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT)-based resection process map (RPM) imaging on the outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 177 patients (RPM group, n = 92; non-RPM group, n = 85) who underwent this surgery between November 2012 and April 2022. Patient-specific contrast-enhanced CT images were used to construct an RPM, a 3D representation of the kidney showing the planned tumor resection and a 5 mm safety margin. Outcome analyses were performed using propensity score matching. The primary endpoint was the trifecta achievement rate. RESULTS: We extracted 90 cases. The trifecta achievement rate showed no significant differences between the RPM (73.3%) and non-RPM groups (73.3%). However, the RPM group had fewer Grade 3 and higher complications (0.0% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.026). The da Vinci Xi (OR 3.38, p = 0.016) and tumor diameter (OR 0.95, p = 0.013) were independent factors affecting trifecta achievement in multivariate analysis. Using RPM imaging was associated with the absence of Grade 3 and higher perioperative complications (OR 5.33, p = 0.036) in univariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Using preoperative 3D CT-based RPM images before RAPN may not affect trifecta achievement, but may reduce serious complication occurrence by providing detailed information on tumor resection.


Asunto(s)
Imagenología Tridimensional , Neoplasias Renales , Nefrectomía , Puntaje de Propensión , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Humanos , Nefrectomía/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Masculino , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Neoplasias Renales/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Anciano , Estudios de Seguimiento , Carcinoma de Células Renales/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Renales/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología
8.
J Surg Oncol ; 2024 Aug 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39155702

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Surgical treatment of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) involves wide resection of the tumor, which can necessitate soft tissue reconstruction with local or free tissue flaps. This retrospective study compares cost, surgical and oncologic outcomes between patients undergoing reconstruction with immediate versus delayed flap coverage following STS resection. METHODS: Thirty-four patients who underwent planned flap reconstruction following resection of primary STS were identified retrospectively. Twenty-four (71%) received immediate reconstruction during the index surgery and 10 (29%) underwent planned delayed reconstruction. Preoperative patient-specific metrics, tumor characteristics, and surgical and patient outcomes were collected. Total hospital charges associated with every encounter during the perioperative period were obtained. RESULTS: Patient demographics, comorbidities, tumor metrics, and surgical characteristics were equivalent between groups. Postoperative wound complications, reoperations, readmissions, and disease-specific survival did not differ between cohorts. Costs associated with each reconstruction strategy were equivalent on bivariate and multivariate testing, when accounting for operating room time, hospital length of stay, and reoperation rate. CONCLUSIONS: Our study identifies no significant difference in patient outcome measures or cost between planned immediate and delayed flap reconstruction following STS resection. These results support the implementation of either treatment strategy in keeping with patient-centered, multidisciplinary care principles.

9.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 24(1): 69, 2024 Feb 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38331727

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic resection is widely accepted as a local treatment for rectal neuroendocrine tumors sized ≤ 10 mm. However, there is no consensus on the best method for the endoscopic resection of rectal neuroendocrine tumors. As a simplified endoscopic procedure, endoscopic submucosal resection with a ligation device (ESMR-L) indicates a histologically complete resection rate comparable to that of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We hypothesized that ESMR-L than ESD would be preferred for rectal neuroendocrine tumors. Hence, this trial aimed to verify whether ESMR-L is non-inferior to ESD in terms of histologically complete resection rate. METHODS: This is a prospective, open-label, multicenter, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial of two parallel groups, conducted at the Shizuoka Cancer Center and 31 other institutions in Japan. Patients with a lesion endoscopically diagnosed as a rectal neuroendocrine tumor ≤ 10 mm are eligible for inclusion. A total of 266 patients will be recruited and randomized to undergo either ESD or ESMR-L. The primary endpoint is the rate of en bloc resection with histologically tumor-free margins (R0 resection). Secondary endpoints include en bloc resection rate, procedure time, adverse events, hospitalization days, total devices and agents cost, adverse event rate between groups with and without resection site closure, outcomes between expert and non-expert endoscopists, and factors associated with R0 resection failure. The sample size is determined based on the assumption that the R0 resection rate will be 95.2% in the ESD group and 95.3% in the ESMR-L group, with a non-inferiority margin of 8%. With a one-sided significance level of 0.05 and a power of 80%, 226 participants are required. Assuming a dropout rate of 15%, 266 patients will be included in this study. DISCUSSION: This is the first multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing ESD and ESMR-L for the R0 resection of rectal neuroendocrine tumors ≤ 10 mm. This will provide valuable information for standardizing endoscopic resection methods for rectal neuroendocrine tumors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCTs042210124. Registered on Jan 6, 2022.


Asunto(s)
Resección Endoscópica de la Mucosa , Tumores Neuroendocrinos , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/cirugía , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/patología , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ligadura , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Resección Endoscópica de la Mucosa/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto
10.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 39(1): 105, 2024 Jul 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38995409

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Few studies have focused on anastomotic recurrence (AR) in colon cancer. This study aimed to clarify the association of resection margin distance with AR and compare the prognosis with nonanastomotic local recurrence (NAR). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included the clinical data of patients who underwent radical colon cancer surgery between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2019. RESULTS: A total of 1958 colon cancer patients were included in the study. 34 of whom (1.7%) had AR and 105 of whom (5.4%) had NAR. Multivariate analysis revealed that the lower distal resection margin distance, advanced N stage, and number of lymph nodes dissected were risk factors for AR. In the proximal resection margin, the risk of AR was lowest at a distance of 6 cm or greater, with a 3-year rate of 1.3%. In the distal resection margin, the 3-year AR risk increased rapidly if the distance was less than 3 cm. The prognosis of patients in the AR group was similar to that of patients in the NAR group, regardless of synchronous distant metastases. Furthermore, the radical surgery rate for AR was significantly higher than that for NAR, but the prognosis of AR was comparable to that of NAR. CONCLUSIONS: The distal resection margin distance, advanced N stage, and less number of lymph nodes dissected are associated with AR of colon cancer. The prognosis of patients with AR was similar to that of patients with NAR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial Numbers NCT04074538 ( clinicaltrials.gov ), August 26, 2019, registered, retrospectively registered.


Asunto(s)
Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Neoplasias del Colon , Márgenes de Escisión , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , China/epidemiología , Anciano , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pronóstico
11.
Surg Endosc ; 38(6): 3441-3447, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38691133

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging has been shown to be a new and innovative way to illustrate the optimal resection margin in hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. This study investigated its accuracy in resection margin determination by looking into the correlation of ICG intensity gradients with pathological examination results of resected specimens. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-center, non-randomized controlled study. Patients who had liver tumors indicating liver resection were recruited. The hypothesis was that the use of intraoperative near-infrared/ICG fluorescence imaging would be a promising guiding tool for removing hepatocellular carcinoma with a better resection margin. Patients were given ICG (0.25 mg/kg) 1 day before operation. Resected specimens were inspected under a fluorescent imaging system. Biopsies were taken from tumors and normal tissue. Color signals obtained from ICG fluorescence imaging were compared with biopsies for analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were recruited for study. The median size of their tumors was 2.25 cm. One patient had resection margin involvement. Under ICG fluorescence, the tumors typically lighted up as yellow color, wrapped by a zone of green color. Tumors of 17 patients (77.3%) displayed yellow color and were confirmed malignancy, while tumors of 12 patients (54.5%) displayed green color and were confirmed malignancy. Receiver operating characteristic curve was used to measure the sensitivity and specificity of the green color to look for a clear resection margin. The area under the curve was 85.3% (p = 0.019, 95% confidence interval 0.696-1.000), with a sensitivity of 0.706 and specificity of 1.000. CONCLUSION: The use of ICG fluorescence can be helpful in determining resection margins. Resection of tumor should include complete resection of the green zone shown in the fluorescence image.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Colorantes , Hepatectomía , Verde de Indocianina , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Márgenes de Escisión , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Hepatectomía/métodos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirugía , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen Óptica/métodos , Adulto
12.
Dis Esophagus ; 2024 Aug 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39140869

RESUMEN

Esophageal cancer presents a clinical challenge due to its high incidence and unfavorable prognosis. The prognostic role of the circumferential resection margin (CRM) remains highly controversial, potentially due to its temporal dynamics coupled with variability in follow-up durations across studies. We aimed to explore the time-dependent prognostic significance of CRM in T3 esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (ESCCs). We systematically reviewed literature from 1990 to 2023 to determine how follow-up duration influences the prognostic role of CRM in esophageal cancer. Concurrently, we performed a retrospective examination of 354 patients who underwent treatment at the National Cancer Center between 2015 and 2018. Integrating a time interaction term in the Cox regression analyses enabled us to not only identify independent risk factors affecting overall survival (OS) but also to specifically scrutinize the potential temporal variations in CRM's prognostic impact. Our literature review suggested that CRM's influence on prognosis diminishes with longer follow-up durations for both classifications, namely the Royal College of Pathologists (RCP) (ß = -0.003, P < 0.001) and the College of American Pathologists (CAP) (ß = -0.007, P < 0.001). Time-dependent multivariate Cox regression analysis emphasized the evolving nature of CRM's prognostic effect, and the inclusion of the time interaction term enhanced model accuracy. In conclusion, CRM is an independent prognostic factor for T3 thoracic ESCC patients. Its influence appears to decrease over extended follow-up periods, shedding light on the heterogeneity seen in previous studies. With the time interaction term, CRM becomes a more precise post-operative prognostic indicator for esophageal cancer.

13.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 281(1): 441-449, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37792215

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the oncologic outcomes among negative, close, positive, and dysplasia resection margins (RMs) with oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and to investigate the impact of dysplastic RMs. METHODS: The 565 patients were retrospectively analyzed and divided into four groups according to RM. Dysplasia was classified into mild, moderate, and severe subgroups. RESULTS: RMs consisted of negative (62.1%), close (27.1%), positive (2.1%), and dysplastic (8.7%). In multivariate analysis, advanced T/N stages and positive RM were significant risk factors for overall survival, while dysplasia at the RM was not a significant risk factor for locoregional recurrence or overall survival. In subgroup analysis of patients with dysplastic margin, RM with severe dysplasia showed higher recurrence than mild and moderate dysplasia. CONCLUSIONS: Dysplastic RM was not a risk factor for recurrence and survival. Severe dysplasia RM should be carefully observed due to higher recurrence compared to other dysplasia RMs.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Neoplasias de la Lengua , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Pronóstico , Neoplasias de la Lengua/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Lengua/patología , Márgenes de Escisión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Hiperplasia
14.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 281(10): 5455-5463, 2024 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38829555

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Histopathological analysis often shows close resection margins after surgical removal of tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC). This study aimed to investigate the agreement between intraoperative 3D ultrasound (US) margin assessment and postoperative histopathology of resected TSCC. METHODS: In this study, ten patients were prospectively included. Three fiducial cannulas were inserted into the specimen. To acquire a motorized 3D US volume, the resected specimen was submerged in saline, after which images were acquired while the probe moved over the specimen. The US volumes were annotated twice: (1) automatically and (2) manually, with the automatic segmentation as initialization. After standardized histopathological processing, all hematoxylin-eosin whole slide images (WSI) were included for analysis. Corresponding US images were found based on the known WSI spacing and fiducials. Blinded observers measured the tumor thickness and the margin in the caudal, deep, and cranial directions on every slide. The anterior and posterior margin was measured per specimen. RESULTS: The mean difference in all measurements between manually segmented US and histopathology was 2.34 (SD: ±3.34) mm, and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was 0.733 (p < 0.001). The smallest mean difference was in the tumor thickness with 0.80 (SD: ±2.44) mm and a correlation of 0.836 (p < 0.001). Limitations were observed in the caudal region, where no correlation was found. CONCLUSION: This study shows that 3D US and histopathology have a moderate to strong statistically significant correlation (r = 0.733; p < 0.001) and a mean difference between the modalities of 2.3 mm (95%CI: -4.2; 8.9). Future research should focus on patient outcomes regarding resection margins.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Imagenología Tridimensional , Márgenes de Escisión , Neoplasias de la Lengua , Ultrasonografía , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Lengua/patología , Neoplasias de la Lengua/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Lengua/cirugía , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estudios Prospectivos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía/métodos
15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39347853

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study's objectives are (1) to investigate the registration accuracy from intraoperative ultrasound (US) to histopathological images, (2) to assess the agreement and correlation between measurements in registered 3D US and histopathology, and (3) to train a nnUNet model for automatic segmentation of 3D US volumes of resected tongue specimens. METHODS: Ten 3D US volumes were acquired, including the corresponding digitalized histopathological images (n = 29). Based on corresponding landmarks, the registrations between 3D US and histopathology images were calculated and evaluated using the target registration error (TRE). Tumor thickness and resection margins were measured based on three annotations: (1) manual histopathological tumor annotation (HTA), manual 3D US tumor annotation, and (2) the HTA registered in the 3D US. The agreement and correlation were computed between the measurements based on the HTA and those based on the manual US and registered HTA in US. A deep-learning model with nnUNet was trained on 151 3D US volumes. Segmentation metrics quantified the model's performance. RESULTS: The median TRE was 0.42 mm. The smallest mean difference was between registered HTA in US and histopathology with 2.16 mm (95% CI - 1.31; 5.63) and a correlation of 0.924 (p < 0.001). The nnUNet predicted the tumor with a Dice similarity coefficient of 0.621, an average surface distance of 1.15 mm, and a Hausdorff distance of 3.70 mm. CONCLUSION: Multimodal image registration enabled the HTA's registration in the US images and improved the agreement and correlation between the modalities. In the future, this could be used to annotate ground truth labels accurately.

16.
BMC Surg ; 24(1): 50, 2024 Feb 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38336762

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is no criterion to guide and evaluate the anastomosis of laparoscopic low anterior resection (LAR). We developed a new technique for precise anastomosis. This study endeavored to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of this new technology. METHODS: Patients with mid-low rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic LAR in our department were enrolled retrospectively between January 1, 2021 and July 1, 2023. During the LAR, the distance between the sacral promontory and the rectal stump was measured and used to determine the length of the sigmoid colon, which was preserved for anastomose. The demographic characteristics and short-term outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients (26 men, 23 women) with low and middle rectal cancer were retrospectively enrolled in the study. The distance of the tumor from the anal verge was 6.4 ± 2.7 cm. The operative time was 193 ± 42 min. All patients underwent precise anastomosis, among which 12 patients underwent freeing of the splenic flexure of the colon. According to our criteria, there was no redundant or tense state of the colon anterior to the sacrum after the anastomosis. Only one patient had a postoperative anastomotic leak (Grade B). All 15 patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy underwent terminal ileostomy. No postoperative death occurred within 30 days of the surgery. The median follow-up time in our study was 12 months. One patient developed a single metastasis in the right lobe of the liver in the eighth month after surgery and underwent microwave radiofrequency ablation, which did not recur in the four months of postoperative follow-up, and the rest of the patients survived disease-free without recurrence of metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: Precise measurement of the proximal colon of the anastomosis can ensure accurate and convenient colorectal anastomosis and this may be a technique worthy of clinical application. However, its effectiveness needs to be further verified in a multicenter clinical trial.


Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Neoplasias del Recto , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Recto/cirugía , Recto/patología , Laparoscopía/métodos , Fuga Anastomótica/etiología
17.
BMC Surg ; 24(1): 280, 2024 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39354419

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: With the increasing application of neoadjuvant therapy in rectal adenocarcinoma, there remain many controversies in clinical practical applications. Preoperative radiotherapy (PR) can limit the surgical plane and potentially affect the quality of surgical treatment. This study aimed to investigate the potential impact of PR on the surgical quality of rectal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed the clinicopathological data from 6,585 AJCC stage I-III rectal adenocarcinoma in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2010 to 2015. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariate Cox proportional were used to assess the impact of PR on survival. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to balance the baseline covariates between the PR and non-PR groups and to compare postoperative pathological differences. RESULTS: After PSM, PR did not improve overall survival (OS) in stages I (p = 0.33), II (p = 0.37), and III (p = 0.14) patients. Multivariate Cox analysis indicated that PR was not an independent prognostic factor for patients. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis demonstrated a nonlinear negative correlation between OS hazard ratios and both circumferential resection margin (CRM) and lymph node evaluation (LNE). Compared to the non-PR group, patients in the PR group had lower tumor deposits (TD) (p < 0.001), positive CRM (p = 0.191), and perineural invasion (PNI) (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: PR is not an independent prognostic factor for rectal adenocarcinoma patients. However, PR can reduce the likelihood of TD, CRM, and PNI, thereby potentially influencing the quality of surgery.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Neoplasias del Recto/radioterapia , Neoplasias del Recto/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Adenocarcinoma/radioterapia , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Programa de VERF , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Puntaje de Propensión , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Adulto
18.
Sensors (Basel) ; 24(5)2024 Feb 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38475103

RESUMEN

(1) Background: Hyperspectral imaging has emerged as a promising margin assessment technique for breast-conserving surgery. However, to be implicated intraoperatively, it should be both fast and capable of yielding high-quality images to provide accurate guidance and decision-making throughout the surgery. As there exists a trade-off between image quality and data acquisition time, higher resolution images come at the cost of longer acquisition times and vice versa. (2) Methods: Therefore, in this study, we introduce a deep learning spatial-spectral reconstruction framework to obtain a high-resolution hyperspectral image from a low-resolution hyperspectral image combined with a high-resolution RGB image as input. (3) Results: Using the framework, we demonstrate the ability to perform a fast data acquisition during surgery while maintaining a high image quality, even in complex scenarios where challenges arise, such as blur due to motion artifacts, dead pixels on the camera sensor, noise from the sensor's reduced sensitivity at spectral extremities, and specular reflections caused by smooth surface areas of the tissue. (4) Conclusion: This gives the opportunity to facilitate an accurate margin assessment through intraoperative hyperspectral imaging.


Asunto(s)
Artefactos , Mastectomía Segmentaria , Movimiento (Física)
19.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 144(7): 2967-2973, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38850420

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Soft tissue sarcomas are a group of malignancies that commonly occur in the extremities. As deep lesions may exist within the confines of the muscular fascia, we postulate that local recurrence rates are higher for superficial soft tissue sarcomas managed by the standard of care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on 90 patients who underwent surgical resection of soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity from 2007 to 2015. Patients with minimum 2-year follow-up and adequate operative, pathologic, and clinical outcomes data were included. RESULTS: Mean age was 54 ± 18 years with 49 (54.4%) patients being male. Lesions in 77.8% of cases were deep, and 22.2% were superficial to fascia. Following the index surgical resection, a total of 33 (36.7%) patients had positive margins. A total of 17 (18.9%) patients had a local recurrence. Overall, 3-year survival was 92.7%, and 5-year survival was 79.0%. Five-year recurrence-free survival of deep sarcomas was 91.1% versus 58.2% of superficial lesions (p = 0.006). Patients with higher tumor depth had lower odds of experiencing a local recurrence (HR 0.26 [95% CI 0.09-0.72]). Local recurence rates was also associated with positive surgical margins on initial resection (33.3% versus 12.3%) (p = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: In this series, superficial tumor depth was associated with local recurrence of soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity following surgical resection. Positive surgical margins was also associated with local recurrence.


Asunto(s)
Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Sarcoma , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sarcoma/cirugía , Sarcoma/patología , Sarcoma/mortalidad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/cirugía , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/mortalidad , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/patología , Márgenes de Escisión
20.
Chin J Cancer Res ; 36(2): 226-232, 2024 Apr 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38751434

RESUMEN

Colorectal cancer has a high incidence and mortality rate in China, with the majority of cases being middle and low rectal cancer. Surgical intervention is currently the main treatment modality for locally advanced rectal cancer, with the common goal of improving oncological outcomes while preserving function. The controversy regarding the circumferential resection margin distance in rectal cancer surgery has been resolved. With the promotion of neoadjuvant therapy concepts and advancements in technology, treatment strategies have become more diverse. Following tumor downstaging, there is an increasing trend towards extending the safe distance of distal rectal margin. This provides more opportunities for patients with low rectal cancer to preserve their anal function. However, there is currently no consensus on the specific distance of distal resection margin.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA