A patient centered assessment of the 2016 ACR-EULAR Myositis Response Criteria: evaluating the meaningfulness of response.

OBJECTIVES: The ACR-EULAR Myositis Response Criteria (Total Improvement Score [TIS]) is a composite measure calculated using changes in myositis core set measures. It is unclear if achieving improvement per TIS reflects improvement in any symptoms of myositis patients. In this study, we examined the association between achieving TIS improvement and patient-centered outcome measures (PCOMs). METHODS: Adults with myositis were enrolled in a prospective study with baseline and 6-month visits. Six core set measures were collected at each visit along with the following PCOMs: Fatigue (visual analogue scale [VAS] and short form 36 [SF36]), pain (VAS, SF36), health-related quality of life (SF-36), physical function (PROMIS-physical function, SF36, sit-to-stand, timed up-and-go, and six-min walk) and physical activity (actigraphy). Mann-Whitney U was used to compare PCOMs between improvement groups. Spearman correlation and regression models were used for correlation and association between TIS and PCOMs, respectively. RESULTS: Of 50 patients (six polymyositis, 24 dermatomyositis, 9 necrotizing myopathy, 11 anti-synthetase syndrome) enrolled (mean age: 52, 60% female), 21 patients satisfied the TIS improvement criteria at 6-months. PCOMs including fatigue, pain, quality of life, physical activity and physical function demonstrated significantly greater improvement in patients who had minimal TIS improvement compared with those with no improvement. Greater PCOM improvements were seen with moderate-major TIS improvement. TIS correlated moderately-strongly with most PCOMs. CONCLUSION: Achieving improvement criteria was accompanied by significant clinical improvements in fatigue, pain, health-related quality of life, physical function, and physical activity. These results support the use of TIS as a clinically meaningful metric of improvement.

Primary central nervous system lymphomas in immunocompromised patients require specific response criteria.

PURPOSE: Immunosuppression is a well-established risk factor for primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSLs), which present in this context distinct radiological characteristics. Our aim was to describe the radiological evolution of treated PCNSL in immunocompromised patients and suggest adapted MRI response criteria. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of patients from the French LOC, K-Virogref and CANCERVIH network databases and enrolled adult immunocompromised patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL. RESULTS: We evaluated the baseline, intermediate, end-of-treatment and follow-up MRI data of 31 patients (9 living with HIV, 16 with solid organ transplantation and 6 with an autoimmune disease under chronic immunosuppressive therapy). At baseline, 23/30 (77%) patients had necrotic lesions with ring enhancement and 28% of the lesions were hemorrhagic. At the end of the first-line treatment, 12/28 (43%) patients could not be classified according to the IPCG criteria. Thirteen of 28 (46%) patients still harbored contrast enhancement, and 11/28 (39%) patients had persistent large necrotic lesions with a median diameter of 15 mm. These aspects were not associated with a pejorative outcome and progressively diminished during follow-up. Six patients relapsed; however, we failed to identify any neuroimaging risk factors on the end-of-treatment MRI. CONCLUSION: In immunocompromised patients, PCNSLs often harbor alarming features on end-of-treatment MRI, with persistent contrast-enhanced lesions frequently observed. However, these aspects seemed to be related to the necrotic and hemorrhagic nature of the lesions and were not predictive of a pejorative outcome. Specific response criteria for this population are thereby proposed.

Performance of the 2016 ACR-EULAR myositis response criteria in juvenile dermatomyositis therapeutic trials and consensus profiles.

OBJECTIVES: The 2016 ACR-EULAR Response Criteria for JDM was developed as a composite measure with differential weights of six core set measures (CSMs) to calculate a Total Improvement Score (TIS). We assessed the contribution of each CSM, representation of muscle-related and patient-reported CSMs towards improvement, and frequency of CSM worsening across myositis response criteria (MRC) categories in validation of MRC. METHODS: Data from JDM patients in the Rituximab in Myositis trial (n = 48), PRINTO JDM trial (n = 139), and consensus patient profiles (n = 273) were included. Observed vs expected CSM contributions were compared using Sign test. Characteristics of MRC categories were compared by Wilcoxon tests with Bonferroni adjustment. Spearman correlation of changes in TIS and individual CSMs were examined. Agreement between physician-assessed change and MRC categories was evaluated by weighted Cohen's kappa. RESULTS: Of 457 JDM patients with IMACS CSMs and 380 with PRINTO CSMs, 9-13% had minimal, 19-23% had moderate and 41-50% had major improvement. The number of improved and absolute percentage change of CSMs increased by MRC improvement level. Patients with minimal improvement by MRC had a median of 0-1 CSM worsened, and those with moderate/major improvement had a median of zero worsening CSMs. Of patients improved by MRC, 94-95% had improvement in muscle strength and 93-95% had improvement in ≥1 patient-reported CSM. IMACS and PRINTO CSMs performed similarly. Physician-rated change and MRC improvement categories had moderate-to-substantial agreement (Kappa 0.5-0.7). CONCLUSION: The ACR-EULAR MRC perform consistently across multiple studies, supporting its further use as an efficacy end point in JDM trials.

Performance of the 2016 ACR-EULAR Myositis Response Criteria in adult dermatomyositis/polymyositis therapeutic trials and consensus profiles.

OBJECTIVE: The ACR-EULAR Myositis Response Criteria (MRC) were developed as a composite measure using absolute percentage change in six core set measures (CSMs). We aimed to further validate the MRC by assessing the contribution of each CSM, frequency of strength vs extramuscular activity improvement, representation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROM), and frequency of CSM worsening. METHODS: Data from adult dermatomyositis/polymyositis patients in the rituximab (n = 147), etanercept (n = 14), and abatacept (n = 19) trials, and consensus patient profiles (n = 232) were evaluated. The Total Improvement Score (TIS), number of improving vs worsening CSMs, frequency of improvement with and without muscle-related CSMs, and contribution of PROM were evaluated by MRC category. Regression analysis was performed to assess contribution of each CSM to the MRC. RESULTS: Of 412 adults with dermatomyositis/polymyositis, there were 37%, 24%, 25%, and 14% with no, minimal, moderate, and major MRC improvement, respectively. The number of improving CSMs and absolute percentage change in all CSMs increased by improvement category. In minimal-moderate improvement, only physician-reported disease activity contributed significantly more than expected by MRC. Of patients with at least minimal improvement, 95% had improvement in muscle-related measures and a majority (84%) had improvement in PROM. Patients with minimal improvement had worsening in a median of 1 CSM, and most patients with moderate-major improvement had no worsening CSMs. Physician assessment of change generally agreed with MRC improvement categories. CONCLUSION: The ACR-EULAR MRC performs consistently across multiple studies, further supporting its use as an efficacy end point in future myositis therapeutic trials.

The prognostic value of [18F]FDG PET/CT based response monitoring in metastatic melanoma patients undergoing immunotherapy: comparison of different metabolic criteria.

PURPOSE: To investigate the prognostic value of [18F]FDG PET/CT as part of response monitoring in metastatic melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). METHODS: Sixty-seven patients underwent [18F]FDG PET/CT before start of treatment (baseline PET/CT), after two cycles (interim PET/CT) and after four cycles of ICIs administration (late PET/CT). Metabolic response evaluation was based on the conventional EORTC and PERCIST criteria, as well as the newly introduced, immunotherapy-modified PERCIMT, imPERCIST5 and iPERCIST criteria. Metabolic response to immunotherapy was classified according to four response groups (complete metabolic response [CMR], partial metabolic response [PMR], stable metabolic disease [SMD], progressive metabolic disease [PMD]), and further dichotomized by response rate (responders = [CMR] + [PMR] vs. non-responders = [PMD] + [SMD]), and disease control rate (disease control = [CMR] + [PMR] + [SMD] vs. [PMD]). The spleen-to-liver SUV ratios (SLRmean, SLRmax) and bone marrow-to-liver SUV ratios (BLRmean, BLRmax) were also calculated. The results of PET/CT were correlated with patients' overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Median patient follow up [95% CI] was 61.5 months [45.3 - 66.7 months]. On interim PET/CT, the application of the novel PERCIMT demonstrated significantly longer survival for metabolic responders, while the rest criteria revealed no significant survival differences between the different response groups. Respectively on late PET/CT, both a trend for longer OS and significantly longer OS were observed in patients responding to ICIs with metabolic response and disease control after application of various criteria, both conventional and immunotherapy-modified. Moreover, patients with lower SLRmean values demonstrated significantly longer OS. CONCLUSION: In patients with metastatic melanoma PET/CT-based response assessment after four ICIs cycles is significantly associated with OS after application of different metabolic criteria. The prognostic performance of the modality is also high after the first two ICIs cycles, especially with employment of novel criteria. In addition, investigation of spleen glucose metabolism may provide further prognostic information.

Meaningful response criteria for myelodysplastic syndromes.

Standardizing response criteria for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), a clinically and biologically heterogeneous group of disorders, has been historically challenging. The International Working Group (IWG) response criteria, first proposed in 2000 and modified in 2006 and 2018, represent the best effort by a group of international experts to define a set of clinically meaningful end-points in MDS. These criteria have been adopted in many MDS clinical trials, allowing for comparisons of response across trials. However, clinical experience has also revealed some limitations of these criteria, and most of the end-points proposed by the IWG require further validation. In this review, we present a critical analysis of the current MDS response criteria from both a practical standpoint and based on currently available clinical trial data. Potential areas for improvement in the criteria are highlighted, which may be considered in future iterations of the response criteria.

Immuno-Imaging (PET/SPECT)-Quo Vadis?

The use of immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment regimen of certain cancer types, but response assessment has become a difficult task with conventional methods such as CT/MRT or FDG PET-CT and the classical response criteria such as RECIST or PERCIST which have been developed for chemotherapeutic treatment. Plenty of new tracers have been published to improve the assessment of treatment response and to stratify the patient population. We gathered the information on published tracers (in total, 106 individual SPECT/PET tracers were identified) and performed a descriptor-based analysis; in this way, we classify the tracers with regard to target choice, developability (probability to progress from preclinical stage into the clinic), translatability (probability to be widely applied in the 'real world'), and (assumed) diagnostic quality. In our analysis, we show that most tracers are targeting PD-L1, PD-1, CTLA-4, and CD8 receptors by using antibodies or their fragments. Another finding is that plenty of tracers possess only minor iterations regarding chelators and nuclides instead of approaching the problem in a new innovative way. Based on the data, we suggest an orthogonal approach by targeting intracellular targets with PET-activatable small molecules that are currently underrepresented.

Treatment beyond progression with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 based regimens in advanced solid tumors: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Treatment beyond progression with immunotherapy may be appropriate in selected patients based on the potential for late responses. The aim of this systematic review was to explore the impact of treatment beyond progression in patients receiving an anti-PD-1/PD-L1 based regimen for an advanced solid tumor. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed to identify prospective clinical trials reporting data on overall response rate by immune-related criteria and/or the number of patients treated beyond conventional criteria-defined PD and/or the number of patients achieving a clinical benefit after an initial PD with regimens including an anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agent which received the FDA approval for the treatment of an advanced solid tumor. RESULTS: 254 (4.6%) responses after an initial RECIST-defined progressive disease were observed among 5588 patients, based on 35 trials included in our analysis reporting this information. The overall rate of patients receiving treatment beyond progressive disease was 30.2%, based on data on 5334 patients enrolled in 36 trials, and the rate of patients who achieved an unconventional response among those treated beyond progressive disease was 19.7% (based on 25 trials for a total of 853 patients). CONCLUSION: The results of our systematic review support the clinical relevance of unconventional responses to anti-PD-1/PD-L1-based regimens; however, most publications provided only partial information regarding immune-related clinical activity, or did not provide any information at all, highlighting the need of a more comprehensive report of such data in trials investigating immunotherapy for the treatment of patients with advanced tumors.

Response criteria for intraocular retinoblastoma: RB-RECIST.

Standardized guidelines for assessing tumor response to therapy are essential for designing and conducting clinical trials. The Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) provide radiological standards for assessment of solid tumors. However, no such guidelines exist for the evaluation of intraocular cancer, and ocular oncology clinical trials have largely relied on indirect measures of therapeutic response-such as progression-free survival-to evaluate the efficacy of treatment agents. Herein, we propose specific criteria for evaluating treatment response of retinoblastoma, the most common pediatric intraocular cancer, and emphasize a multimodal imaging approach for comprehensive assessment of retinoblastoma tumors in clinical trials.

The reliability of bone marrow cytology as response criterion in metastatic neuroblastoma.

BACKGROUND: The quantitative assessment of neuroblastoma cell content in bone marrow aspirates for response evaluation has been introduced recently. Data on the concordance of interobserver reports are lacking so far. METHODS: Investigators of seven European countries representing national reference or large oncological centers convened in 2016. They agreed to quantitatively assess routine bone marrow smears of the participating institutions and to discuss the discrepant results in joint meetings. RESULTS: From 2017 through 2019, three cytology rounds with 24, 28, and 28 bone marrow samples were run evaluating the representativity of the smears (yes/[restricted]/no) and the presence of tumor cells (yes/no and %). The comparison of the reports using κ (Fleiss) and α (Krippendorff) statistics demonstrated no robust reliabilities. The agreement on the representativity was moderate to poor, on the presence of tumor cells moderate to good, and on the percentage of tumor cells slight to moderate. Though the value of cytology is unquestioned to detect even tiny metastatic cells in bone marrow, the investigators unanimously agreed that a reliable quantification of the tumor cell content in bone marrow smears is unrealistic. For the key issue of representativity, a new practical definition was developed. CONCLUSION: For any work with bone marrow aspirates, the representativity of the material is of paramount importance. A practical definition is proposed. A reliable quantitative cytological assessment of tumor cell content in bone marrow aspirates is not feasible in metastatic neuroblastoma. Therefore, its use as response criterion should be reconsidered.

Cancer Clinical Trials: What Every Radiologist Wants to Know but Is Afraid to Ask.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to provide radiologists with a guide to the fundamental principles of oncology clinical trials. The review summarizes the evolution and structure of modern clinical trials with an emphasis on the relevance of clinical trials in the field of oncologic imaging. CONCLUSION. Understanding the structure and clinical relevance of modern clinical trials is beneficial for radiologists in the field of oncologic imaging.

Single response assessment of transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma: a supplementary analysis of JCOG1105 (JCOG1105S1).

BACKGROUND: The International Myeloma Working Group response criteria require two consecutive assessments of paraprotein levels. We conducted an exploratory analysis to evaluate whether a single response assessment could be a substitute for the International Myeloma Working Group criteria using data from JCOG1105, a randomized phase II study on melphalan, prednisolone and bortezomib. METHODS: Of 91 patients with transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, 79 patients were included. We calculated the kappa coefficient to evaluate the degree of agreement between the International Myeloma Working Group criteria and the single response assessment. RESULTS: Based on the International Myeloma Working Group criteria, 11 (13.9%), 20 (25.3%), 36 (45.6%) and 12 (15.2%) patients had stringent complete response/complete response, very good partial response, partial response and stable disease, respectively. Based on the single response assessment, 17 (21.5%), 19 (24.1%), 35 (44.3%) and 8 (10.1%) patients had stringent complete response/complete response, very good partial response, partial response and stable disease, respectively. The kappa coefficient was 0.76 (95% confidence interval, 0.65-0.88), demonstrating good agreement. The single response assessment was not inferior to the International Myeloma Working Group criteria in the median progression-free survival (3.8 and 2.9 years) in stringent complete response/complete response patients, suggesting that the single response assessment was not an overestimation. CONCLUSIONS: The single response assessment could be a substitute for the current International Myeloma Working Group criteria for transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Association between end-induction response according to the revised International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria (INRC) and outcome in high-risk neuroblastoma patients.

BACKGROUND: The 1993 International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria (INRC) were revised in 2017 to include modern functional imaging studies and methods for quantifying disease in bone marrow. We hypothesized the 2017 INRC would enable more precise assessment of response to treatment and provide superior prognostic information compared with the 1993 criteria. METHODS: High-risk (HR) neuroblastoma patients from two institutions in Chicago diagnosed between 2006 and 2016 were identified. Patients were assessed post induction chemotherapy via the 1993 and 2017 INRC and classified as responder (≥ mixed response [MXR] or ≥ minor response [MR], respectively) or nonresponder (< MXR or < MR). Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) for responders versus nonresponders were determined from end induction and stratified by Cox regression. Patients with progressive disease at end induction were eliminated from the EFS analyses but included in the OS analysis. RESULTS: The 1993 criteria classified 52 of the 60 HR patients as responders, whereas 54 responders were identified using the 2017 criteria (Spearman correlation r = 0.82, P < 0.001). No statistically significant difference in EFS was observed for responders versus nonresponders using either criteria (P = 0.48 and P = 0.08). However, superior OS was observed for responders (P = 0.01) using either criteria. Both criteria were sensitive in identifying responders among those with good outcomes. The specificity to identify nonresponders among those with poor outcomes was poor. CONCLUSIONS: In HR neuroblastoma, end-induction response defined by the 1993 or 2017 INRC is associated with survival. Larger cohorts are needed to determine if the 2017 INRC provides more precise prognostication.

Immune Response Evaluation and Treatment with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Beyond Clinical Progression: Response Assessments for Cancer Immunotherapy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review provides a comprehensive assessment of recent literature reports describing atypical response patterns observed with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), modifications to response evaluation criteria for ICIs, and treatment beyond progression in clinical trials. RECENT FINDINGS: Certain response patterns such as durable response, pseudoprogression, hyperprogression, and dissociated responses can be seen with ICI treatment. These patterns carry differing prognoses and are associated with varied factors. There are multiple modifications of standard Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) that have been proposed to better characterize immunotherapy response; however, standard RECIST1.1 remains most commonly used in clinical trials. Treatment beyond progression varies in frequency and benefit depending on assessment criteria and cancer type. Future research incorporating modified imaging criteria and biomarker assessments may serve to clarify who will benefit most from treatment beyond progression.

Response evaluation for immunotherapy through semi-automatic software based on RECIST 1.1, irRC, and iRECIST criteria: comparison with subjective assessment.

BACKGROUND: Pseudoprogression is difficult to diagnose in patients undergoing immunotherapy. Subjective response assessment is still common in clinical practice. PURPOSE: To evaluate the differences between response evaluation criteria in solid tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), immune-related response criteria (irRC), and modified RECIST 1.1 for immunotherapy (iRECIST) through semi-automatic software, and to compare iRECIST-based response evaluation with subjective assessment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The best overall response of each patient based on RECIST 1.1, irRC, and iRECIST was determined on CT scans through semi-automatic software and the differences between the criteria were evaluated. Criteria-based response evaluation through semi-automatic software was compared with subjective assessment on radiology report by correlating the best overall response to overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 21 patients were included (five patients with melanoma, 12 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, and four patients with hepatocellular carcinoma). Two patients with progressive disease by RECIST 1.1 but non-progressive disease by irRC and iRECIST eventually experienced tumor response and had favorable outcomes, indicating pseudoprogression. The survival difference between patients with non-progressive disease and progressive disease was better stratified through iRECIST-based response evaluation (P = 0.078) than that through subjective assessment (P = 0.501). CONCLUSION: Pseudoprogression in immunotherapy may be captured through semi-automatic software utilizing irRC or iRECIST criteria. iRECIST-based response evaluation may provide a better survival stratification compared with subjective assessment.

Assessment of the response of hepatocellular carcinoma to interventional radiology treatments.

According to Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) guidelines, interventional radiology procedures are valuable treatment options for many hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) that are not amenable to resection or transplantation. Accurate assessment of the efficacy of therapies at earlier stages enables completion of treatment, optimal follow-up and to prevent potentially unnecessary treatments, side effects and costly failure. The goal of this review is to summarize and describe the radiological strategies that have been proposed to predict survival and to stratify HCC responses after interventional radiology therapies. New techniques currently in development are also described.

To do or not to do: A concise update of current clinical controversies in immune checkpoint blockade.

Although programmed death-ligand 1 is currently the best available biomarker for first-line therapy with pembrolizumab for patients with non-small cell lung cancer and is a required companion test approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, programmed death-ligand 1 testing is an option (as a complementary test) for patients treated with nivolumab, atezolizumab, and durvalumab. Programmed death-ligand 1 expression is continuously variable and dynamic in the tumor microenvironment. Due to the complex molecular and cellular interactions involved in immune response, a single biomarker may not be sufficient to predict response to cancer immunotherapy. Integration of multiple tumor, immune response, and genomic parameters is likely to influence the future interpretation of biomarker-based treatment outcomes. This article, in a case-based format, concisely summarizes most up-to-date evidence in answering some commonly seen clinical controversies of cancer immunotherapy, in terms of (i) the predictive value of programmed death-ligand 1 as a biomarker; (ii) whether the use of steroids with checkpoint inhibitors will decrease efficacy of the latter; (iii) selection of patients for cancer immunotherapy based on immune-based response criteria, and (iv) whether the use of influenza vaccine with checkpoint inhibitors is considered safe. Until more robust, long-term prospective clinical data are available, these discussions may serve as a starting point for pharmacists to gain timely and effective management of these realistic issues.

Immunotherapy and the role of imaging.

Significant advances in the genetic and molecular characterization of cancer have led to the development of effective immunotherapies. These therapeutics help the host immune system recognize cancer as foreign, promote the immune system, and relieve the inhibition that allows growth and spread of tumors. Experience with various immunotherapies, particularly the immunomodulatory monoclonal antibody ipilimumab, has demonstrated that unique patterns of response may be encountered that cannot be adequately captured by traditional response criteria, such as the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), which have been used primarily with cytotoxic chemotherapies. In response to these observations, several novel response criteria have been developed to evaluate patients who receive immunotherapy, including immune-related response criteria (irRC), immune-related RECIST (irRECIST), and immune RECIST (iRECIST). These criteria are typically used in conjunction with RECIST version 1.1 in the clinical trial setting, because approval of new therapeutics by the US Food and Drug Administration relies on the responses derived from RECIST version 1.1. Finally, a wide variety of immune-related adverse events may affect patients who receive immunotherapy, many of which can be identified on imaging studies such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and 2-deoxy-2-(fluorine-18)fluoro-D-glucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography. In this review, the authors present the role of imaging in the evaluation of patients treated with immunotherapy, including the background and application of irRC, irRECIST, and iRECIST; the imaging of immune-related adverse events; and future directions in advanced imaging of immunotherapy. Cancer 2018;124:2906-22. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

Imaging practice in low-grade gliomas among European specialized centers and proposal for a minimum core of imaging.

OBJECTIVE: Imaging studies in diffuse low-grade gliomas (DLGG) vary across centers. In order to establish a minimal core of imaging necessary for further investigations and clinical trials in the field of DLGG, we aimed to establish the status quo within specialized European centers. METHODS: An online survey composed of 46 items was sent out to members of the European Low-Grade Glioma Network, the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies, the German Society of Neurosurgery and the Austrian Society of Neurosurgery. RESULTS: A total of 128 fully completed surveys were received and analyzed. Most centers (n = 96, 75%) were academic and half of the centers (n = 64, 50%) adhered to a dedicated treatment program for DLGG. There were national differences regarding the sequences enclosed in MRI imaging and use of PET, however most included T1 (without and with contrast, 100%), T2 (100%) and TIRM or FLAIR (20, 98%). DWI is performed by 80% of centers and 61% of centers regularly performed PWI. CONCLUSION: A minimal core of imaging composed of T1 (w/wo contrast), T2, TIRM/FLAIR, PWI and DWI could be identified. All morphologic images should be obtained in a slice thickness of ≤ 3 mm. No common standard could be obtained regarding advanced MRI protocols and PET. IMPORTANCE OF THE STUDY: We believe that our study makes a significant contribution to the literature because we were able to determine similarities in numerous aspects of LGG imaging. Using the proposed "minimal core of imaging" in clinical routine will facilitate future cooperative studies.

Predictors of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival using NANT Response Criteria (v1.0) in relapsed and refractory high-risk neuroblastoma.

PURPOSE: The New Approaches to Neuroblastoma Therapy Response Criteria (NANTRC) were developed to optimize response assessment in patients with recurrent/refractory neuroblastoma. Response predictors and associations of the NANTRC version 1.0 (NANTRCv1.0) and prognostic factors with outcome were analyzed. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of patients with recurrent/refractory neuroblastoma enrolled from 2000 to 2009 on 13 NANT Phase 1/2 trials. NANTRC overall response integrated CT/MRI (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST]), metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG; Curie scoring), and percent bone marrow (BM) tumor (morphology). RESULTS: Fourteen (6.9%) complete response (CR) and 14 (6.9%) partial response (PR) occurred among 203 patients evaluable for response. Five-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 16 ± 3%; overall survival (OS) was 27 ± 3%. Disease sites at enrollment included MIBG-avid lesions (100% MIBG trials; 84% non-MIBG trials), measurable CT/MRI lesions (48%), and BM (49%). By multivariable analysis, Curie score of 0 (P < 0.001), lower Curie score (P = 0.003), no measurable CT/MRI lesions (P = 0.044), and treatment on peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) supported trials (P = 0.005) were associated with achieving CR/PR. Overall response of stable disease (SD) or better was associated with better OS (P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, MYCN amplification (P = 0.037) was associated with worse PFS; measurable CT/MRI lesions (P = 0.041) were associated with worse OS; prior progressive disease (PD; P < 0.001/P < 0.001), Curie score ≥ 1 (P < 0.001; P = 0.001), higher Curie score (P = 0.048/0.037), and treatment on non-PBSC trials (P = < 0.001/0.003) were associated with worse PFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: NANTRCv1.0 response of at least SD is associated with better OS in patients with recurrent/refractory neuroblastoma. Patient and tumor characteristics may predict response and outcome. Identifying these variables can optimize Phase 1/2 trial design to select novel agents for further testing.