RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Neuroblastoma is a pediatric malignancy with heterogeneous clinical outcomes. Our aim was to identify prognostic genetic markers for patients with neuroblastoma, who were treated with the Taiwan Pediatric Oncology Group (TPOG) neuroblastoma N2002 protocol, to improve risk stratification and inform treatment. METHODS: Our analysis was based on 53 primary neuroblastoma specimens, diagnosed pre-chemotherapy, and 11 paired tumor relapse specimens. Deep sequencing of 113 target genes was performed using a custom panel. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification was performed to identify clinical outcomes related to copy-number variations. RESULTS: We identified 128 variations associated with survival, with the number of variations being higher in the relapse than that in the diagnostic specimen (p = .03). The risk of event and mortality was higher among patients with a tumor mutational burden ≥10 than that in patients with a lower burden (p < .0001). Multivariate analysis identified tumor mutational burden, MYCN amplification, and chromosome 3p deletion as significant prognostic factors, independent of age at diagnosis, sex, and tumor stage. The 5-year event-free survival and overall survival rate was lower among patients with high tumor burden than in patients with low tumor burden. Furthermore, there was no survival of patients with an ALK F1147L variation at 5 years after diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Genome sequencing to determine the tumor mutational burden and ALK variations can improve the risk classification of neuroblastoma and inform treatment.
Asunto(s)
Mutación , Neuroblastoma , Humanos , Neuroblastoma/genética , Neuroblastoma/mortalidad , Neuroblastoma/patología , Masculino , Femenino , Preescolar , Lactante , Niño , Pronóstico , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Tasa de Supervivencia , Estudios de Seguimiento , Variaciones en el Número de Copia de ADN , Carga Tumoral , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , AdolescenteRESUMEN
Curative-intent therapy leads to complete remissions in many adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but relapse remains common. Numerous studies have unequivocally demonstrated that the persistence of measurable ('minimal') residual disease (MRD) at the submicroscopic level during morphologic remission identifies patients at high risk of disease recurrence and short survival. This association has provided the impetus to customize anti-leukemia therapy based on MRD data, a strategy that is now routinely pursued in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). While it is currently uncertain whether this approach will improve outcomes in AML other than APL, randomized studies have validated MRD-based risk-stratified treatment algorithms in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Here, we review the available studies examining MRD-directed therapy in AML, appraise their strengths and limitations, and discuss avenues for future investigation.
Asunto(s)
Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/diagnóstico , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/terapia , Neoplasia Residual/patología , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Terapia Combinada/efectos adversos , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Humanos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/etiología , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/mortalidad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Cure rates for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia differ markedly in higher- and lower-income countries due to disparate hospital infrastructure and resources. Where means are limited, treatment-related mortality is higher and compliance may be suboptimal. Upfront risk assignment is aimed at individualizing therapy according to presenting features in order to avoid over- or under-treatment. However, the necessary technical resources and expertise are not always readily available. The authors provide suggestions for management of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in developing nations. To improve patient care locally, the authors recommend that communication technology be used to sustain partnerships between sponsoring and partner pediatric oncology programs. The aims of these collaborations should be to prioritize resources, identify existing problems and reduce treatment intensity and hence treatment-related morbidity and mortality in patients at lower risk of relapse.