The study of variant s antigen expression revealing a novel c.160C>T (p.Arg54Cys) variant on GYPB*s allele associated with partial s phenotype.

BACKGROUND: Little s antigen is mainly defined by a single nucleotide polymorphism at c.143C (p.Thr48) on the GYPB gene. Several variants on GYPB can alter the expression of s antigen. The aim of this study was to investigate the molecular basis of variant s antigen expression in the Chinese population. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 4983 whole blood samples were collected to screen the individuals with discrepant s typing results using two different monoclonal anti-s. Then, the sequence of GYPB exon 4 was analyzed by Sanger sequencing. Flow cytometry analysis was performed to quantify s antigen expression on red blood cells (RBCs). In vitro expression study was performed to verify the effect of the GYPB variants identified on the expression of s antigen. RESULTS: Four donors were identified to have discrepant s typing results. Sanger sequencing showed that three donors carried the c.173C > G variant (p.Pro58Arg) specific for sD antigen, the other one carried a novel GYPB (c.160C > T, p.Arg54Cys) variant. Flow cytometry identified a partial and weak expression of s antigen on the RBCs of the four donors. Furthermore, in vitro expression study confirmed the effect of the two variants on the s antigen expression. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrated that in addition to p.Thr48, the two extra amino acids p.Arg54 and p.Pro58 are also important for full expression of s antigen. Since the individuals with partial s antigen are at risk for the development of alloanti-s, it is important to select at least two different monoclonal anti-s for correct s typing.

Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn caused by anti-sD antibody in a GP.Mur/Mur Thai mother and review of the prevalence of sD in Thai blood donors.

BACKGROUND: Low-prevalence antigen sD (MNS23) is encoded by GYPB c.173C > G. Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) due to anti-sD is rare. A mother delivered a newborn whose red blood cells (RBCs) were DAT-positive and was later diagnosed with HDFN. Serum from the mother was incompatible with the father's RBCs and was used to screen 184 Thai blood donors. This study aimed to investigate the cause of HDFN in a Thai family and determine the prevalence of sD in Thai blood donors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three family members and four blood donors were investigated in the study. Massively Parallel Sequencing (MPS) was used for genotyping. Standard hemagglutination techniques were used in titration studies, phenotyping, and enzyme/chemical studies. Anti-s, anti-Mia , anti-JENU, and anti-sD reagents were used in serological investigations. RESULTS: The mother was GYP*Mur/Mur. The father and the four donors were GYPB*s/sD predicting S - s + sD +. The baby was GYP*Mur/sD and his RBCs were Mia +, s + w with anti-s (P3BER) and JENU+w . RBCs from two GYPB*sD -positive blood donors reacted with anti-sD (Dreyer). Proteolytic enzyme α-chymotrypsin-treated sD + cells did not react with anti-sD (Wat) produced by the GP.Mur/Mur mother but reacted with the original anti-sD (Dreyer). DISCUSSION: This is the first report of HDFN due to anti-sD in the Asian population. The genotype frequency for GYPB*sD in a selected Thai blood donor population is 2.2% (4/184). Anti-sD should be considered in mothers with Southeast Asian or East Asian background when antibody identification is unresolved in pregnancies affected by HDFN.