Intraoperative radiotherapy combined with spinal stabilization surgery-a novel treatment strategy for spinal metastases based on a first single-center experiences.

INTRODUCTION: Current treatment of spinal metastases (SM) aims on preserving spinal stability, neurological status, and functional status as well as achieving local control. It consists of spinal surgery followed by radiotherapy and/or systemic treatment. Adjuvant therapy usually starts with a delay of a few weeks to prevent wound healing issues. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) has previously been successfully applied during brain tumor, breast and colorectal carcinoma surgery but not in SM, including unstable one, to date. In our case series, we describe the feasibility, morbidity and mortality of a novel treatment protocol for SM combining stabilization surgery with IORT. METHODS: Single center case series on patients with SM. Single session stabilization by navigated open or percutaneous procedure using a carbon screw-rod system followed by concurrent 50 kV photon-IORT (ZEISS Intrabeam). The IORT probe is placed via a guide canula using navigation, positioning is controlled by IOCT or 3D-fluroscopy enabling RT isodose planning in the OR. RESULTS: 15 (8 female) patients (71 ± 10y) received this treatment between 07/22 and 09/23. Median Spinal Neoplastic Instability Score was 8 [7-10] IQR. Most metastasis were located in the thoracic (n = 11, 73.3%) and the rest in the lumbar (n = 4, 26.7%) spine. 9 (60%) patients received open, 5 (33%) percutaneous stabilization and 1 (7%) decompression only. Mean length of surgery was 157 ± 45 min. Eleven patients had 8 and 3 had 4 screws placed. In 2 patients radiotherapy was not completed due to bending of the guide canula with consecutive abortion of IORT. All other patients received 8 Gy isodoses at mdn. 1.5 cm [1.1-1.9, IQR] depth during 2-6 min. The patients had Epidural Spinal Cord Compression score 1a-3. Seven patients (46.7%) experienced adverse events including 2 surgical site infection (one 65 days after surgery). CONCLUSION: 50 kV photon IORT for SM and consecutive unstable spine needing surgical intervention is safe and feasible and can be a promising technique in selected cases.

Preoperative prediction of early mortality after surgery for spinal metastases.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to provide a convenient preoperative prediction of the risk of early postoperative mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who underwent surgery for spinal metastasis at our hospital between 2009 and 2021. Preoperative blood test data of all patients were collected, and the survival time was calculated by dividing the blood data. A multivariate analysis was conducted using a Cox proportional hazards model to identify prognostic factors. RESULTS: The study population included 83 patients (average: 64.5 years), 22 of whom died within 3 months. The most common lesion was the thoracic spine, and incomplete paralysis was observed in 57 patients. The surgical methods included posterior implant fixation (n = 17), posterior decompression (n = 31), and posterior decompression with fixation (n = 35). In the univariate analysis, the presence of abnormal values was significantly associated with postoperative survival in six preoperative blood collection items (hemoglobin, C-reactive protein, albumin, white blood cell, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, and lactate dehydrogenase). In a multivariate analysis, four test items (hemoglobin, C-reactive protein, white blood cell, and lactate dehydrogenase) were identified as independent prognostic factors.Comparing cases with ≥3 abnormal values among the above four items (high-risk group; n = 23) and those with ≤2 (low-risk group; n = 60), there was a significant difference in survival time. In addition, it was possible to predict cases of early death within 3 months after surgery with 73% sensitivity and 89% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that four preoperative blood test abnormalities (hemoglobin, C-reactive protein white blood cell, and lactate dehydrogenase) indicated the possibility of early death within 3 months after surgery.

End-of-life walking ability in cancer patients with spinal metastases.

BACKGROUND: Even terminal cancer patients desire to walk to the toilet by themselves until the very last day. This study aimed to describe the walking ability of patients with spinal metastases at the end-of-life stage and identify the factors affecting this ability. METHODS: Among 527 patients who first visited our multidisciplinary team for bone metastasis between 2013 and 2016, 56 patients who had spinal metastases with a Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score ≥7 and died during follow-up were included. We collected general clinical data, performance status, Frankel classification, epidural spinal cord compression scale and Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score at the first consultation. Patients' last day of walking and date of death were also examined. Univariate analyses (chi-squared tests) were performed to identify the factors that impacted walking ability 30 and 14 days before patients' death. RESULTS: A total of 56 patients were extracted, and 57.1% (32/56) and 32.7% (16/49) of patients were ambulatory 30 and 14 days before death, respectively. Their performance status (P = 0.0007), Frankel grade (P = 0.012) and epidural spinal cord compression grade (P = 0.006) at the first examination, and administration of bone modifying agents during follow-up period (P = 0.029) were significantly related to walking ability 30 days before death. Among ambulatory patients 30 days before death, those with Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score ≥10 (P = 0.005), especially with high scores of collapse (P = 0.002) and alignment (P = 0.002), were less likely to walk 14 days before death. The walking period in the last month of their life was significantly longer in patients with total Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score 7-9 (P = 0.009) and in patients without collapse (P = 0.040) by the Wilcoxon test. CONCLUSION: The progression of spinal metastasis, especially neurological deficit, at the initial consultation were associated with walking ability 30 days before death, and spinal stability might be crucial for preserving walking ability during the last month. Early diagnosis and implementation of appropriate bone management might be important for the end-of-life walking ability.

Trends in the surgical treatment for metastatic spinal tumor in Japanese administrative data between 2012 and 2020.

BACKGROUND: Both cancer diagnosis/treatment modality and surgical technique for the spine have been developed recently. Nationwide trends in the surgical treatment for metastatic spinal tumors have not been reported in the last decades. This study aimed to examine recent trends in the surgical treatment for spinal metastasis and in-hospital patient outcomes using nationwide administrative hospital discharge data. METHODS: The Diagnosis Procedure Combination database from 2012 to 2020 was used to extract data from patients who underwent surgical procedures for spinal metastasis with the number of non-metastatic spinal surgery at the institutions that have performed metastatic spine surgeries at least one case in the same year. Trends in the surgical treatment for spinal metastasis, patients' demographics, and in-hospital mortality/outcomes were investigated. RESULTS: This study analyzed 10,321 eligible patients with spinal metastasis. The surgical treatment for spinal metastasis increased 1.68 times from 2012 to 2020, especially in fusion surgery, whereas the proportion of metastatic spinal surgery retained with a slight increase in the 2%s. Distributions of the primary site did not change, whereas age was getting older. In-hospital mortality and length of stay decreased over time (9.9-6.8%, p < 0.001; 37-30 days, p < 0.001). Postoperative complication and unfavorable ambulatory retained stable and slightly decreased, respectively. CONCLUSION: During the last decade, surgical treatment for spinal metastasis, especially fusion surgery, has increased in Japan. In-hospital mortality and length of stay decreased. Recent advances in cancer treatment and surgical techniques might influence this trend.

Survival and neurological outcomes following management of intramedullary spinal metastasis patients: a case series with comprehensive review of the literature.

Intramedullary spinal cord metastasis (ISCM), though rare, represents a potentially debilitating manifestation of systemic cancer. With emerging advances in cancer care, ISCMs are increasingly being encountered in clinical practice. Herein, we describe one of the larger retrospective single institutional case series on ISCMs, analyze survival and treatment outcomes, and review the literature. All surgically evaluated ISCMs at our institution between 2005 and 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, tumor features, treatment, and clinical outcome characteristics were collected. Neurological function was quantified via the Frankel grade and the McCormick score (MCS). The pre- and post-operative Karnofsky performance scores (KPS) were used to assess functional status. Descriptive statistics, univariate analysis, log-rank test, and the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were performed. A total of 9 patients were included (median age 67 years (range, 26-71); 6 were male). Thoracic and cervical spinal segments were most affected (4 patients each). Six patients (75%) underwent surgical management (1 biopsy and 5 resections), and 3 cases underwent chemoradiation only. Post-operatively, 2 patients had an improvement in their neurological exam with one patient becoming ambulatory after surgery; three patients maintained their neurological exam, and 1 had a decline. There was no statistically significant difference in the pre- and post-operative MCS and median KPS scores in surgically treated patients. Median OS after ISCM diagnosis was 7 months. Absence of brain metastasis, tumor histology (renal and melanoma), cervical/thoracic location, and post-op KPS ≥ 70 showed a trend toward improved overall survival. The incidence of ISCM is increasing, and earlier diagnosis and treatment are considered key for the preservation of neurological function. When patient characteristics are favorable, surgical resection of ISCM can be considered in patients with rapidly progressive neurological deficits. Surgical treatment was not associated with an improvement in overall survival in patients with ISCMs.

A critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on surgical treatments for spinal metastasis.

PURPOSE: As an important treatment for spinal metastasis, surgery has strict applicable conditions. Although various organizations have formulated different guidelines on surgical treatment for spinal metastasis (SM), there are certain differences in the content, standardization and quality of the guidelines and it is necessary to make a critical appraisal of them. We aim to systematically review and appraise the current guidelines on surgical treatments of SM and summarize the related recommendations with the quality evaluation of supporting evidence, as to provide a reference for the standardization of surgical treatment plans, and help clinical front-line medical workers can make safe and effective clinical decisions faster. METHODS: We searched Pubmed, Web of Science, and Embase for three major databases and online guideline databases. According to certain inclusion and exclusion criteria, the latest guidelines on the surgical treatment of SM were sorted out. AGREE II was used to evaluated the guideline's quality, and we extracted and compared the recommended treatment content of each guideline with evaluating by the evidence-grading scale. RESULTS: Eight guidelines from 2013 to 2019 were included. Seven guidelines are comprehensive guidelines and one related to the reconstructive surgery of SM. Five guidelines were evaluated as "recommended," and three guidelines were evaluated as "recommended with modifications." Regarding the indications of surgery with SM, four guidelines, seven guidelines, seven guidelines, three guidelines and three guidelines recommended surgical treatment for patients with SM with intractable pain, mechanical instability, metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC), recurrent spinal metastasis (RSM), and survival predication, respectively. Regarding the surgical strategies, three guidelines recommended minimally invasive therapy but had strict indications. Six guidelines and five guidelines recommend palliative surgery and with receiving radiation therapy, respectively. For the aggressive surgery, only one guideline recommended to apply to patients in good general conditions who has isolated symptomatic SM. Regarding the surgical reconstructions, one guideline didn't recommend iliac bone graft and three guidelines recommended PMMA bone cement. CONCLUSION: Most of the guidelines do not provide clear criteria for surgical application and provide more of a basic framework. The level of evidence for these surgical recommendations ranges from LOE B to D, and almost all guidelines recommend vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty, but for palliative and more aggressive surgery, which recommended to personalize specific surgical strategies with multidisciplinary collaboration.

Assessment of survival prediction after surgery in spinal metastases patients using the Global Spine Study Tumor Group (GSTSG) risk calculator; an external validation from a tertiary cancer hospital.

PURPOSE: We aim to validate the Global Spine Tumor Study Group (GSTSG) score compared to previous prognostic scoring systems in spinal metastasis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study from January 2013 to December 2022. The survival prediction was compared between the GSTSG, Tomita Score, Revised Tokuhashi Score, and Skeletal Oncology Research Group (SORG) Nomogram. Single-variable factors associated with survival rate were analyzed using univariate Cox regression and multivariable Cox proportional hazard model. Receiver operating characteristic was used for external validity analysis at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. The overall survival rate was reported using the Kaplan-Meier survival curve. RESULTS: 248 spinal metastasis patients were included. The mean age was 59.23 ± 12.55 years. The mean duration of follow-up time was 470.29 ± 441.98 days. The external validity of GSTSG was the highest at all follow-up times (sufficiently accurate AUC > 0.7), which was about the same as SORG at 3 months (both AUC of GSTSG and SORG = 0.76) and higher than modified Tokuhashi and Tomita score at 12 months (AUC of GSTSG = 0.78, SORG = 0.71, Tomita = 0.64, and modified Tokuhashi = 0.61, respectively). CONCLUSION: From our study, the Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicates that the significant factors related to survival rate are regular analgesic use of weak opioids, lung metastasis, and previous chemotherapy. Compared to other traditional spinal metastases prognostic scoring systems, GSTSG shows the highest AUC for external validity in all follow-up times up to 24 months.

Analysis of D-dimer levels for the detection of deep venous thrombosis for patients with spinal metastasis undergoing decompression with fixation.

BACKGROUND: Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) after spinal surgery has recently attracted increasing attention. Patients with spinal metastases who undergo decompression with fixation are at a high risk of developing DVT. D-dimer levels indicate the risk of DVT, and the purpose of our study was to investigate D-dimer levels as a predictor of DVT perioperatively. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 100 patients with spinal metastases. D-dimer tests were performed twice: once before surgery and one day postoperatively. DVT was diagnosed by duplex ultrasonographic assessment of both lower extremities. Pulmonary embolisms (PEs) were diagnosed using multidetector computed tomography and pulmonary angiography. Perioperative serum D-dimer levels were compared between the DVT (+) and DVT (-) groups. The cutoff value of the D-dimer level was calculated using receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: Preoperative and postoperative DVT prevalences were 8.0% (8/100) and 6.6% (6/91), respectively, and none of the patients developed PE. Before surgery, there was no significant differences in D-dimer levels between the pre-DVT (+) and pre-DVT (-) groups. After surgery, the D-dimer level one-day postoperatively for the post-DVT (+) group (17.6 ± 11.8 mg/L) was significantly higher than that of the post-DVT (-) group (5.0 ± 4.7 mg/L). The cutoff value of the postoperative D-dimer level was 9.51(mg/L), and the sensitivity and specificity for the optimum threshold were 83.3% and 89.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that preoperative D-dimer level may not be a predictor of DVT. Preoperative ultrasound examinations should be routinely performed in patients with spinal metastases. Postoperative D-dimer levels greater than 9.51(mg/L) are a predictive factor for the early diagnosis of DVT after spine surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Our study was registered on Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No.ChiCTR2000029737). Registered 11 February 2020 - Retrospectively registered, https://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx.

Impact of surgical treatment on patient reported outcome in patients with spinal metastases from prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to elucidate postoperative outcomes in patients with spinal metastases of prostate cancer, with a focus on patient-oriented assessments. METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter registry study involving 35 centers. A total of 413 patients enrolled in the Japanese Association for Spine Surgery and Oncology Multicenter Prospective Study of Surgery for Metastatic Spinal Tumors were evaluated for inclusion. The eligible patients were followed for at least 1 year after surgery. The Frankel Classification, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, visual analog scale for pain, face scale, Barthel Index, vitality index, indications for oral pain medication, and the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire were used for evaluating functional status, activities of daily living, and patient motivation. RESULTS: Of the 413 eligible patients, 41 with primary prostate cancer were included in the study. The patient-oriented assessments indicated that the patients experienced postoperative improvements in quality of life and motivation in most items, with the improvements extending for up to 6 months. More than half of the patients with Frankel classifications B or C showed improved neurological function at 1 month after surgery, and most patients presented maintained or improved their classification at 6 months. CONCLUSION: Surgical intervention for spinal metastases of prostate cancer significantly improved neurological function, quality of life, and motivation of the patients. Consequently, our results support the validity of surgical intervention for improving the neurological function and overall well-being of patients with spinal metastases of prostate cancer.

Safety and feasibility of ultra-long construct navigated minimally invasive spine surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy in extensive spinal metastasis : a comparative analysis.

BACKGROUND: Our study compares the outcomes of extensive spinal metastasis patients treated with Ultra-Long Construct Navigated Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery (UNMISS) with Adjuvant Radiotherapy to those receiving only radiotherapy. Spinal metastasis often necessitates interventions like radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or surgery, with an increasing trend towards surgical management. minimally invasive spine surgery has demonstrated advantages over traditional open surgery, with fewer complications and better postoperative outcomes. Radiotherapy continues as a standard for those unsuitable for surgery. METHODS: This retrospective study included extensive spinal metastasis patients treated between January 2017 and December 2020. We compared patients undergoing UNMISS in conjunction with radiotherapy to patients receiving radiotherapy alone, evaluating demographic data, disease characteristics, and treatment outcomes (VAS, survival) to establish statistical significance. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were included in our study. Fourteen patients underwent UNMISS, and nine patients received radiotherapy alone. There was no difference in baseline characteristics of patients. The longest construct in our case series involved T1 to iliac. Both cohorts showed significant improvement in pain scores post-treatment (p = 0.01). However, the UNMISS group demonstrated significantly lower post-treatment VAS scores (p = 0.003), indicating enhanced pain relief. Survival outcomes did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The UNMISS should be considered as an alternative treatment in a patient with symptomatic extensive spinal metastasis. The primary goal of this technique is to stabilize the multiple levels of spinal metastasis and decompression of the neural element if needed. This technique is safe and has a better outcome in pain improvement than the patient who received radiotherapy alone.

Assessment of Hidden Blood Loss in Spinal Metastasis Surgery: A Comprehensive Approach with MRI-Based Radiomics Models.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing surgery for spinal metastasis are predisposed to hidden blood loss (HBL), which is associated with poor surgical outcomes but unpredictable. PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of MRI-based radiomics models for assess the risk of HBL in patients undergoing spinal metastasis surgery. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. SUBJECTS: 202 patients (42.6% female) operated on for spinal metastasis with a mean age of 58 ± 11 years were divided into a training (n = 162) and a validation cohort (n = 40). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 1.5T or 3.0T scanners. Sagittal T1-weighted and fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging sequences. ASSESSMENT: HBL was calculated using the Gross formula. Patients were classified as low and high HBL group, with 1000 mL as the threshold. Radiomics models were constructed with radiomics features. The radiomics score (Radscore) was obtained from the optimal radiomics model. Clinical variables were accessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Independent risk variables were used to build a clinical model. Clinical variables combined with Radscore were used to establish a combined model. STATISTICAL TESTS: Predictive performance was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score. Calibration curves and decision curves analyses were produced to evaluate the accuracy and clinical utility. RESULTS: Among the radiomics models, the fusion (T1WI + FS-T2WI) model demonstrated the highest predictive efficacy (AUC: 0.744, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.576-0.914). The Radscore model (AUC: 0.809, 95% CI: 0.664-0.954) performs slightly better than the clinical model (AUC: 0.721, 95% CI: 0.524-0.918; P = 0.418) and the combined model (AUC: 0.752, 95% CI: 0.593-0.911; P = 0.178). DATA CONCLUSION: A radiomics model may serve as a promising assessment tool for the risk of HBL in patients undergoing spinal metastasis surgery, and guide perioperative planning to improve surgical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Factors affecting survival and prognosis in surgically treated patients with spinal metastases arising from renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to explore the prognostic factors for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients with spinal metastasis who underwent surgical treatment in our hospital. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data and survival status of 49 patients with spinal metastases arising from RCC. All patients with spinal metastases underwent surgical treatment. We analyzed a range of factors that may affect the prognosis of patients with RCC. Using Kaplan-Meier method to perform univariate analysis of the factors that might affect spine metastasis free survival (SMFS)and survival after spinal metastasis (OS) respectively. Establish Cox proportional hazards model to extract independent prognostic factors for SMFS and OS. RESULTS: The mean time of SMFS was 27 months (median 8, range 0-180 months). The mean time of OS was 12.04 months (median 9, range 2-36 months). RCC with visceral metastasis (p = 0.001,HR 11.245,95%CI 2.824-44.776) and AJCC RCC Stage (p = 0.040,HR 2.809,95%CI 1.046-7.543) can significantly affect SMFS. Furthermore, WHO/ISUP Grade (p < 0.001, HR 2.787,95%CI 1.595-4.870), ECOG Score (p = 0.019, HR 0.305,95%CI 0.113-0.825) and multiple spinal metastases (p < 0.001, HR 0.077,95%CI 0.019-0.319) have significant effects on OS. CONCLUSIONS: RCC with visceral metastasis and AJCC RCC Stage were independent prognostic factors for SMFS. WHO/ISUP Grade, ECOG Scores and multiple spinal metastases were independent prognostic factors for OS.

MRI-based radiomics nomogram for differentiation of solitary metastasis and solitary primary tumor in the spine.

BACKGROUND: Differentiating between solitary spinal metastasis (SSM) and solitary primary spinal tumor (SPST) is essential for treatment decisions and prognosis. The aim of this study was to develop and validate an MRI-based radiomics nomogram for discriminating SSM from SPST. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-five patients with solitary spinal tumors were retrospectively studied and the data set was divided into two groups: a training set (n = 98) and a validation set (n = 37). Demographics and MRI characteristic features were evaluated to build a clinical factors model. Radiomics features were extracted from sagittal T1-weighted and fat-saturated T2-weighted images, and a radiomics signature model was constructed. A radiomics nomogram was established by combining radiomics features and significant clinical factors. The diagnostic performance of the three models was evaluated using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves on the training and validation sets. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test was performed to assess the calibration capability of radiomics nomogram, and we used decision curve analysis (DCA) to estimate the clinical usefulness. RESULTS: The age, signal, and boundaries were used to construct the clinical factors model. Twenty-six features from MR images were used to build the radiomics signature. The radiomics nomogram achieved good performance for differentiating SSM from SPST with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.980 in the training set and an AUC of 0.924 in the validation set. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test and decision curve analysis demonstrated the radiomics nomogram outperformed the clinical factors model. CONCLUSIONS: A radiomics nomogram as a noninvasive diagnostic method, which combines radiomics features and clinical factors, is helpful in distinguishing between SSM and SPST.

Holocord metastasis from supratentorial glioblastoma multiforme: an uncommon manifestation of a common tumor.

Intramedullary metastasis from primary glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a rare phenomenon with a poor prognosis. The rate of spinal metastasis from intracranial GBM has been variably reported to be 0.4-2%. According to a review by Lawton in 2012, there were only 42 documented cases of primary intracranial GBM with spinal metastasis. We present a unique case of early-onset symptomatic holocord metastasis of GBM in a patient approximately 2 months of detection of primary GBM.

Reevaluating age restrictions of spinal metastasis surgery in elderly groups with over 2-year follow-up.

This study aimed to compare and assess clinical outcomes of spinal metastasis with epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) in patients aged 65-79 years and ≥ 80 years with an acute onset of neurological illness who underwent laminectomy. A second goal was to determine morbidity rates and potential risk factors for mortality. This retrospective review of electronic medical records at a single institution was conducted between September 2005 and December 2020. Data on patient demographics, surgical characteristics, complications, hospital clinical course, and 90-day mortality were also collected. Comorbidities were assessed using the age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). A total of 99 patients with an overall mean age of 76.2 ± 3.4 years diagnosed with MESCC within a 16-year period, of which 65 patients aged 65-79 years and 34 patients aged 80 years and older were enrolled in the study. Patients aged 80 and over had higher age-adjusted CCI (9.2 ± 2.1) compared to those aged 65-79 (5.1 ± 1.6; p < 0.001). Prostate cancer was the primary cause of spinal metastasis. Significant neurological and functional decline was more pronounced in the older group, evidenced by Karnofsky Performance Index (KPI) scores (80+ years: 47.8% ± 19.5; 65-79 years: 69.0% ± 23.9; p < 0.001). Despite requiring shorter decompression duration (148.8 ± 62.5 min vs. 199.4 ± 78.9 min; p = 0.004), the older group had more spinal levels needing decompression. Median survival time was 14.1 ± 4.3 months. Mortality risk factors included deteriorating functional status and comorbidities, but not motor weakness, surgical duration, extension of surgery, hospital or ICU stay, or complications. Overcoming age barriers in elderly surgical treatment in MSCC patients can reduce procedural delays and has the potential to significantly improve patient functionality. It emphasizes that age should not be a deterrent for spine surgery when medically necessary, although older MESCC patients may have reduced survival.

More help than harm: surgery for metastatic spinal cord compression is associated with more favorable overall survival within a propensity score analysis.

PURPOSE: Indication for surgical decompression in metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) is often based on prognostic scores such as the modified Bauer score (mBs), with favorable prognosis suggestive of surgery and poor prognosis of non-surgical management. This study aimed to clarify if (1) surgery may directly affect overall survival (OS) aside from short-term neurologic outcome, (2) explore whether selected patient subgroups with poor mBs might still benefit from surgery, and (3) gauge putative adverse effects of surgery on short-term oncologic outcomes. METHODS: Single-center propensity score analyses with inverse-probability-of-treatment-weights (IPTW) of OS and short-term neurologic outcomes in MSCC patients treated with or without surgery between 2007 and 2020. RESULTS: Among 398 patients with MSCC, 194 (49%) underwent surgery. During a median follow-up of 5.8 years, 355 patients (89%) died. MBs was the most important predictor for spine surgery (p < 0.0001) and the strongest predictor of favorable OS (p < 0.0001). Surgery was associated with improved OS after accounting for selection bias with the IPTW method (p = 0.021) and emerged as the strongest determinant of short-term neurological improvement (p < 0.0001). Exploratory analyses delineated a subgroup of patients with an mBs of 1 point who still benefited from surgery, and surgery did not result in a higher risk of short-term oncologic disease progression. CONCLUSION: This propensity score analysis corroborates the concept that spine surgery for MSCC associates with more favorable neurological and OS outcomes. Selected patients with poor prognosis might also benefit from surgery, suggesting that even those with low mBs may be considered for this intervention.

Performance assessment and external validation of specific thresholds of total psoas muscle cross-sectional area as predictors of mortality in oncologic spine surgery for spinal metastases.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of low muscle mass (LMM) in predicting 90-day and 12-month mortality after spinal tumor surgery. METHODS: We identified 115 patients operated on for spinal metastases between April 2012 and August 2022 who had available perioperative abdominal or lumbar spine CT scans and minimum 90-day follow-up. LMM was defined as a total psoas muscle cross-sectional area (TPA) at the L4 pedicle level less than 10.5 cm2 for men and less than 7.2 cm2 for women based on previously reported thresholds. A secondary analysis was performed by analyzing TPA as a continuous variable. The primary endpoint was 90-day mortality, and the secondary endpoint was 12-month mortality. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: The 90-day mortality was 19% for patients without and 42% for patients with LMM (p = 0.010). After multivariate analysis, LMM was not independently associated with increased odds of 90-day mortality (odds ratio 2.16 [95% confidence interval 0.62 to 7.50]; p = 0.223). The 12-month mortality was 45% for patients without and 71% for patients with LMM (p = 0.024). After multivariate analysis, LMM was not independently associated with increased odds of 12-month mortality (OR 1.64 [95% CI 0.46 to 5.86]; p = 0.442). The secondary analysis showed no independent association between TPA and 90-day or 12-month mortality. CONCLUSION: Patients with LMM had higher rates of 90-day and 12-month mortality in our study, but this was not independent of other parameters such as performance status, hypoalbuminemia, or primary cancer type.

The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is independently associated with 90-day and 12-month mortality after metastatic spinal tumor surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Estimated postoperative survival is an important consideration during the decision-making process for patients with spinal metastases. Nutritional status has been associated with poor outcomes and limited survival in the general cancer population. The objective of this study was to evaluate the predictive utility of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) for postoperative mortality after spinal metastasis surgery. METHODS: A total of 139 patients who underwent oncologic surgery for spinal metastases between April 2012 and August 2022 and had a minimum 90-day follow-up were included. PNI was calculated using preoperative serum albumin and total lymphocyte count, with PNI < 40 defined as low. The mean PNI of our cohort was 43 (standard deviation: 7.7). The primary endpoint was 90-day mortality, and the secondary endpoint was 12-month mortality. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: The 90-day mortality was 27% (37/139), and the 12-month mortality was 56% (51/91). After controlling for age, ECOG performance status, total psoas muscle cross-sectional area (TPA), and primary cancer site, the PNI was associated with 90-day mortality [odds ratio 0.86 (95% confidence interval 0.79-0.94); p = 0.001]. After controlling for ECOG performance status and primary cancer site, the PNI was associated with 12-month mortality [OR 0.89 (95% CI 0.82-0.97); p = 0.008]. Patients with a low PNI had a 50% mortality rate at 90 days and an 84% mortality rate at 12 months. CONCLUSION: The PNI was independently associated with 90-day and 12-month mortality after metastatic spinal tumor surgery, independent of performance status, TPA, and primary cancer site.

Efficacy and safety of erythropoietin in isolated spinal metastasis patients with total en bloc spondylectomy surgery: a case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study is to identify the effect of short-term and high-dose use of erythropoietin (EPO) in spinal isolated metastatic patients with Total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) surgery by assessing hematological parameters, transfusion volume, postoperative complications, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS). METHODS: From January 2015 and January 2022, 93 isolated spinal metastasis patients were selected and separated into 2 groups based on the treatment method used (EPO + TXA (Tranexamic acid) group, n = 47; and TXA group, n = 46). Indexes for evaluation included hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit (Hct), red blood cells (RBC), RFS, OS, postoperative complications, postoperative Frankel Grade, drainage volume, transfusion rate, and mean units transfused. RESULTS: The average follow-up duration was 38.13 months. There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) in RFS, OS, postoperative complications, postoperative Frankel Grade, drainage volume, and transfusion rate between the two groups. However, patients in EPO + TXA group have significantly higher Hb, Hct, and RBC values than those in the TXA group on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 5. Moreover, the mean transfusion volume in EPO + TXA group was significantly lower than those in the TXA group (P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative short-term and high-dose administration of EPO could improve the anemia-related hematological parameters and reduce the requirement for blood transfusion without increasing the risk of deep vein thrombosis and tumor progression in solitary spinal metastatic patients with TES surgery.

Predictive factors for respiratory failure and in-hospital mortality after surgery for spinal metastasis.

PURPOSE: Spinal metastasis surgeries carry substantial risk of complications. PRF is among complications that significantly increase mortality rate and length of hospital stay. The risk factor of PRF after spinal metastasis surgery has not been investigated. This study aims to identify the predictors of postoperative respiratory failure (PRF) and in-hospital death after spinal metastasis surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with spinal metastasis surgically treated between 2008 and 2018. PRF was defined as mechanical ventilator dependence > 48 h postoperatively (MVD) or unplanned postoperative intubation (UPI). Collected data include demographics, laboratory data, radiographic and operative data, and postoperative complications. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to determine predictors independently associated with PRFs and in-hospital death. RESULTS: This study included 236 patients (average age 57 ± 14 years, 126 males). MVD and UPI occurred in 13 (5.5%) patients and 13 (5.5%) patients, respectively. During admission, 14 (5.9%) patients had died postoperatively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed significant predictors of MVD included intraoperative blood loss > 2000 mL (odds ratio [OR] 12.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.88-52.36), surgery involving cervical spine (OR 9.58, 95% CI 1.94-47.25), and ASA classification ≥ 4 (OR 6.59, 95% CI 1.85-23.42). The predictive factors of UPI included postoperative sepsis (OR 20.48, 95% CI 3.47-120.86), central nervous system (CNS) metastasis (OR 10.21, 95% CI 1.42-73.18), lung metastasis (OR 7.18, 95% CI 1.09-47.4), and postoperative pulmonary complications (OR 6.85, 95% CI 1.44-32.52). The predictive factors of in-hospital death included postoperative sepsis (OR 13.15, 95% CI 2.92-59.26), CNS metastasis (OR 10.55, 95% CI 1.54-72.05), and postoperative pulmonary complications (OR 9.87, 95% CI 2.35-41.45). CONCLUSION: PRFs and in-hospital death are not uncommon after spinal metastasis surgery. Predictive factors for PRFs included preoperative comorbidities, intraoperative massive blood loss, and postoperative complications. Identification of risk factors may help guide therapeutic decision-making and patient counseling.