Severe intestinal malabsorption associated with ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker treatment. An observational cohort study in Germany and Italy.

PURPOSE: The angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) olmesartan has been recently associated with sprue-like enteropathy (SLE), a gastrointestinal condition characterized by intestinal malabsorption (IM) and severe diarrhea. Whether the increased risk of SLE is substance-specific or a class effect involving all ARBs is uncertain. The aim of this study is to assess the risk of enteropathy associated with ARBs and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-i) by using data from large administrative and claim databases. METHODS: We obtained data from Italian local health-care units and a large German claim database and included patients treated with olmesartan, other ARBs, and ACE-i. In the absence of a specific diagnosis code for SLE, International Classification of Diseases codes for IM were used. Analysis implemented a Poisson regression with robust error variance procedure, which allowed accounting for different clusters (local health-care units and countries) and correctly estimating the standard error for the relative risk of rare event occurrence. RESULTS: Patients were divided into 3 groups: olmesartan (25.591, 5.5%), other ARBs (104.901, 22.5%), and ACE-i patients (334.951, 72.0%). Baseline characteristics were similar overall. The incidence of unspecified IM in ACE-i patients was not different compared with that of olmesartan, whereas a higher rate ratio was observed when comparing ARB patients with the olmesartan group (RR: 2.50, 95% CI 1.21 to 5.19, P .01). When International Classification of Diseases codes for coeliac disease were included, no differences were observed. CONCLUSIONS: We could not confirm previous findings of a higher risk of malabsorption in olmesartan-only patients, and drug-induced enteropathy should be considered the result of exposure to the class of ARBs rather than a specific drug-related effect.

Diagnosis and resolution of olmesartan-associated sprue-like enteropathy confirmed by capsule endoscopy: a case report and literature review.

Herein, we describe a case of olmesartan-associated sprue-like enteropathy, in which improvement in villous atrophy was confirmed using small bowel capsule endoscopy. The patient was a 69-year-old woman who had persistent watery diarrhea (20 bowel movements/day) for 1 year and experienced a weight loss of 10 kg in the same period. Abdominal computed tomography revealed no abnormalities, and blood test results revealed no inflammatory reactions. Upper endoscopy and colonoscopy revealed villous atrophy in the duodenum and terminal ileum. As the patient was administered olmesartan for a long time and capsule endoscopy showed villous atrophy throughout the small bowel, she was diagnosed with olmesartan-associated sprue-like disease. Following the discontinuation of the medication, symptoms of diarrhea soon improved, and repeat capsule endoscopy indicated improvement in small intestinal villous atrophy. Olmesartan-associated sprue-like enteropathy should be considered a differential diagnosis in patients with severe chronic watery diarrhea. Our report is the first in which capsule endoscopy was performed multiple times over a long period for follow-up observation of improvements in the small intestine. In addition, our literature review regarding capsule endoscopy for olmesartan-associated enteritis might aid clinicians in the early diagnosis of the condition and the assessment of treatment efficacy.

Non-celiac Enteropathy and Olmesartan: An Essential Consideration.

Emerging evidence has shed light on non-celiac causes of enteropathy in recent years, presenting a diagnostic challenge for clinicians. This study discusses the diagnostic challenges related to non-celiac enteropathy, specifically focusing on olmesartan-induced enteropathy (OIE). A 73-year-old lady presented to the emergency department with a six-month history of watery diarrhea exacerbated by food intake and significant weight loss. The patient at admission was found to be dehydrated with severe hypokalemia and hypocalcemia. The extensive testing that was performed was unremarkable, including celiac disease panel, enteric panel, ova and parasites, Clostridium difficile, fecal calprotectin, and computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis. A significant electrolyte imbalance was corrected at admission, and subsequent upper endoscopy investigation with duodenal biopsies revealed moderate to severe villi blunting with a significant intraepithelial infiltrate of CD3+ lymphocytes. A colonoscopy that was performed at the same time was unremarkable, with negative biopsies for microscopic colitis. Given the suspicion of OIE, olmesartan was discontinued. One-month follow-up revealed resolution of malabsorption, with electrolyte normalization and duodenal biopsies showing improved duodenitis. This study emphasizes the importance of considering medication history and ruling out other potential causes of enteropathy. Olmesartan is an angiotensin II receptor antagonist that is commonly prescribed for hypertension. However, in rare cases, it may induce enteropathy, which often remains underdiagnosed. This rare side effect may present as chronic diarrhea, weight loss, and signs of malabsorption. Interestingly, OIE presents with overlapping clinical and histopathological features to celiac disease and, therefore, may mislead physicians to an extensive diagnostic investigation. Greater awareness of medication-related diarrheal syndromes such as OIE should be promoted, given that simple discontinuation of the medication can lead to dramatic clinical improvement.

Candesartan-Induced Enteropathy That Mimics Celiac Disease in a 90-Year-Old Patient.

Sprue-like enteropathy (SLE) is a clinical syndrome similar to celiac disease and has been associated with the use of various angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), a class of medications frequently used in the management of hypertension. Currently, there has only been one documented case report which has observed this occurrence with the use of the ARB candesartan. A 90-year-old female patient presented with chronic diarrhea and weight loss of unclear etiology. Diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy and ileocolonoscopy were macroscopically unremarkable, but histological samples revealed complete villous atrophy, chronic mucosal inflammation, and intraepithelial T-lymphocytic infiltration. However, serological studies could not confirm celiac disease as a cause for the patient's symptoms of malabsorption. After exclusion of other intestinal inflammation etiologies with noted ongoing candesartan use, the diagnosis of SLE was made, and candesartan therapy was discontinued. Additionally, we decided to initiate a lactose-free diet. Clinical remission was achieved without any recurrences. Candesartan is a commonly prescribed therapeutic agent in the treatment of hypertension. Our case underlines the importance of considering it as a potential cause for unexplained symptoms of malabsorption.

Angiotensin Receptor Blockers Associated Enteropathy-Brief Report.

The current literature has shown equivocal results regarding the association of Olmesartan and other angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) use and the presence of Celiac sprue-like enteropathy (CSLE). Various factors affecting the association are- patient population under study, geographic area, and duration of use of medication. Various case reports/case series and observational studies have shown the mixed results regarding an association. We have tried to answer a question what exists in the literature regarding the angiotensin receptor blockers related sprue like enteropathy.

Olmesartan-Induced Enteropathy: A Report of an Unusual Cause of Chronic Diarrhea.

Olmesartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker indicated in the treatment of hypertension, has been associ-ated with a seronegative sprue-like enteropathy that should be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients with unexplained chronic diarrhoea. It typically presents with severe chronic diarrhoea, considerable weight loss, and villous atrophy on biopsy and may be difficult to recognize because of its clinical and histological similarities to other clinical entities. Practically, discontinuation of the drug leads to dramatic recovery of the symptoms. We report a 76-year-old Caucasian female who was admitted to our hospital with complaints of chronic diarrhea and significant weight loss. Medical history was notable for hypertension being treated with olmesartan. Initially, investigation for all potential infectious causes and celiac disease was negative. Both upper and lower endoscopy was performed with duodenal biopsies revealing total villous atrophy and colonic biopsies showing lymphocytic colitis. In the presence of negative serology for celiac disease and after a thorough review of the patient's medications, olmesartan in-duced-enteropathy was the most possible diagnosis. Olmesartan was discontinued and the symptoms rapidly resolved. A follow-up done a few months later showed no recurrence of the symptoms. In olmesartan-associated enteropathy, discontinuation of olmesartan results in immediate clinical recovery. Although rare, it is considered an emerging and underdiagnosed enteropathy. This case report illustrates the need for a thorough medication history evaluation and regular review during workup. We aim to increase the awareness of olmesartan-induced enteropathy among clinicians and gastroenterologists. We hope it will add to the current literature and help to understand this rare phenomenon in order to avoid unnecessary testing.

Olmesartan-associated sprue-like enteropathy diagnosed by capsule endoscopy and double balloon endoscopy.

Sprue-like enteropathy associated with olmesartan is characterized by villous atrophy in the duodenum. We report the case of an 81-year-old woman diagnosed with olmesartan-associated sprue-like enteropathy with no villous atrophy in the duodenum. The patient had been taking olmesartan for 10 years and complained of diarrhea and weight loss. Despite undergoing general treatment for 2 months, her symptoms showed no improvement. Gastrointestinal endoscopy and pathological findings showed no villous atrophy in the duodenum. However, villous atrophy was observed in the small intestine by capsule endoscopy. Pathological biopsy with double balloon endoscopy provided a definitive diagnosis. Diarrhea improved with the discontinuation of olmesartan and weight increased within a week of withdrawal. After the improvement of clinical symptoms, both endoscopic and pathological findings of villous atrophy in small intestine showed improvement.

Sprue-Like Enteropathy and Liver Injury: A Rare Emerging Association with Olmesartan.

Olmesartan-induced enteropathy is an underreported phenomenon, first described in 2012. While olmesartan's antihypertensive properties were confirmed early on, its association with a sprue-like enteropathy was subsequently noted. Although this association has been reported with olmesartan, there have been few reports of this association with other angiotensin-receptor blockers. We present a case of a 79-year-old male who presented with diarrhea, weight loss, jaundice, and transaminitis. Further history revealed that he had been taking olmesartan 40 mg daily for hypertension. Workup of his diarrhea and jaundice included duodenal and liver biopsies revealed findings consistent with a sprue-like enteropathy and an autoimmune hepatitis-like pattern. On discontinuation of olmesartan, his 1-month follow-up revealed significant improvement in his clinical status as well as his liver function tests. Olmesartan is an effective antihypertensive medication; however, physicians must be mindful of its side effect of causing a sprue-like enteropathy and liver injury. Patients should be counseled on discontinuing olmesartan, and they should be started on an alternative therapy for hypertension.

Cutaneous ulcers in association with sprue-like enteropathy secondary to Losartan.

Losartan is an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) which may cause severe sprue-like enteropathy (SLE) with skin manifestation. Clinicians should be informed of this side effect and its reversibility after cessation of the drug.

Olmesartan-Induced Enteropathy: A Case of Recurrent Diarrhoea.

A 77-year-old man with arterial hypertension and dyslipidaemia, treated with olmesartan/hydrochlorothiazide and simvastatin, was admitted with a 3-week history of anorexia, nausea, vomiting, profuse diarrhoea and weight loss. He was dehydrated and blood tests showed acute kidney injury. The aetiological study was inconclusive. The patient had a favourable clinical evolution during hospitalization and was discharged. However, after about 10 days at home, he was re-admitted to hospital with the same clinical presentation. It was noticed that olmesartan had not been prescribed during the previous admission but had been restarted on an outpatient basis. Biopsy examination showed duodenal mucosa with villous atrophy and polymorphic inflammatory infiltrate. Antibody testing for coeliac disease was negative. Based on these facts, it was hypothesized that the patient had olmesartan-induced enteropathy, which was subsequently confirmed. LEARNING POINTS: Drug-induced sprue-like enteropathy must be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients with diarrhoea, weight loss, and villous atrophy of the duodenal mucosa of unknow origin.Olmesartan has been associated with the development of enteropathy.Olmesartan-induced enteropathy can happen years after drug initiation.

Olmesartan Associated Enteropathy: Usefulness of Video Capsule Endoscopy in a Case With Doubtful Upper Endoscopic/Histological Picture.

BACKGROUND: Olmesartan, an antihypertensive drug, may be associated with a severe "sprue-like enteropathy". OBJECTIVES: To report a case of Olmesartan enteropathy demonstrated by video capsule endoscopy distally from the second duodenum along with the whole small bowel before and after drug withdrawal. CASE PRESENTATION: A 81-years-old man was referred for asthenia, chronic watery diarrhea and anasarca (ascites, pleural effusion and edemas of superior and inferior limb). The only comorbidity was hypertension treated with Olmesartan. All causes of infective and inflammatory chronic diarrhea were investigated and excluded. Upper endoscopy was normal; histological examination of the second portion of the duodenum showed moderate and patchy infiltration of lymphocytes at mucosal and intra-epithelial level with intermittent partial villous atrophy. The possibility of adverse drug reaction, estimated by Naranjo scale, showed a score of 7, indicating a strong probability. Olmesartan was then withdrawn. However, because of severe clinical general condition, we preferred to corroborate our diagnostic work-up by a non-invasive investigation, i.e. video capsule endoscopy, which showed jejunal and ileal mucosal alterations (mosaic pattern, diffuse hyperemia, severe edema, consequent apparent reduced lumen, diffuse thickening of intestinal folds, multiple erosions, patchy lymphangectasia). After 14 days, the resolution of anasarcatic state and hydroelectrolytic imbalances was observed. Nine months later, small-bowel video-capsule demonstrated mild mucosal hyperaemia and mosaic pattern. CONCLUSION: Our case could give new insights in the field of Olmesartan associated enteropathy by highlighting the possibility of distally main lesion location and, therefore, the usefulness of video capsule endoscopy in the presence of doubtful diagnostic features.

Pharmacy and therapeutics committees strategy to address olmesartan safety issues at a primary care level.

Background Olmesartan, an antihypertensive drug, has been associated with a severe and potentially life-threatening sprue-like enteropathy, consisting of a serious, chronic diarrhoea and malabsorption syndrome. Treatment with this drug should be discontinued if patients develop such symptoms. Objective To retrospectively determine the reduction in olmesartan prescription following a strategy promoted by pharmacy and therapeutics committees within daily clinical practice to manage updated safety information on olmesartan. Setting Three primary healthcare centres. Method In May 2016, local pharmacy and therapeutics committees integrated by general practitioners, nursing staff and clinical pharmacists sent information about olmesartan safety issues to general practitioners, together with an individual list of their patients who were then being treated with olmesartan. Moreover, information about dose equivalents between angiotensin II receptor blockers and angiotensin II receptor blockers versus angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors was also attached. The strategy aimed to promote individual benefit/risk assessment by general practitioners of the continuation of olmesartan treatment as a means to achieving a decrease in the risk of sprue-like enteropathy. The investigation team retrospectively reviewed the clinical records. Main outcome measure Reduction of olmesartan prescription. Results Olmesartan was discontinued in 44.4% of patients (197/444) in the year after the safety alert e-mail. In their medical records general practitioners registered that, after informing about olmesartan safety warnings, in four cases (0.9%), patients reported gastrointestinal symptoms. Conclusion A multidisciplinary strategy implemented to promote individual benefit/risk assessment regarding continuation of olmesartan treatment showed an important reduction in olmesartan prescriptions 1 year later.

Telmisartan-induced sprue-like enteropathy: a case report.

A possible case of sprue-like enteropathy (SLE) induced by the use of telmisartan is reported. Telmisartan is an angiotensin-receptor II blocker (type 1) used for the treatment of hypertension. Several cases of SLE associated with olmesartan and other drugs of the same group have been reported. In all cases, SLE resolved following therapy withdrawal. We describe the case of an 80-year-old woman who presented with diarrhoea and abdominal pain. In the past 5 years she had been treated with telmisartan 40 mg once a day for hypertension, so we hypothesised that symptoms might be caused by telmisartan. After treatment discontinuation, diarrhoea disappeared. Three causality algorithms were applied and revealed a possible or likely causal relationship. At present, the patient remains asymptomatic. There is a causal relationship between the use of telmisartan and SLE. This association should be taken into account by physicians when prescribing and reviewing drug therapies.

[Olmesartan therapy and enteropathy: About two cases and review of the literature]. / Traitement par olmésartan et entéropathie : à propos de deux cas et revue de la littérature.

INTRODUCTION: Olmesartan is an angiotensin II receptor blocker, used to treat arterial hypertension. Severe digestive manifestations have been associated with olmesartan, including sprue-like enteropathy and lymphocytic colitis. OBSERVATIONS: We report two cases of sprue-like enteropathy associated with olmesartan, leading to malabsorption syndrome related to villous atrophy. After olmesartan discontinuation, patients exhibited resolution of clinical digestive symptoms and disappearance of biochemical abnormalities. CONCLUSION: Our case reports underscore that accurate questioning is crucial in diagnostic approach, allowing to make the diagnosis of sprue-like enteropathy related to olmesartan in our patients. Interestingly, particular attention has recently been drawn to the fact that sprue-like disease may be a class effect of angiotensin II receptor blockers; further investigations are warranted to confirm these latter data.

A Case of Moderate Sprue-Like Enteropathy Associated With Telmisartan.

Sprue-like enteropathy associated with olmesartan medoxomil use has been recently reported. Its clinical manifestations include diarrhea, weight loss and malabsorption. Duodenal biopsies show villous atrophy (VA) with or without intraepithelial lymphocytosis and inflammation of the lamina propria. Serology for celiac disease (CD) is negative and gluten-free diet does not result in clinical improvement. Symptoms resolve after olmesartan discontinuation. Follow-up biopsies show recovery/improvement of the duodenum. Whether sprue-like enteropathy is a specific adverse reaction to olmesartan or rather a class effect of angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) remains a controversial issue. We report a case of sprue-like enteropathy associated with telmisartan. A 52-year-old man presented with chronic diarrhea, abdominal discomfort and significant weight loss. In the last 3 years, he had been treated with telmisartan 40 mg/day for hypertension after right adrenalectomy for an aldosterone-producing adenoma. Laboratory investigations showed no significant abnormalities: Hb 13.6 g/dL, serum albumin 3.9 g/dL, total cholesterol 193 mg/dL, serum creatinine 0.99 mg/dL, sodium 143.6 mmol/L, K+ 4.3 mmol/L, calcium 9.3 mg/dL, phosphorus 3.9 mg/dL and 25-OH-D3 27.7 ng/mL. Duodenal histology showed subtotal VA and inflammation of the lamina propria. CD serology was negative. HLA-DQ typing showed absence of the DQ2/DQ8 haplotypes. After telmisartan discontinuation, patient's symptoms subsided, and his body weight increased despite persistence of a gluten-containing diet. Follow-up biopsies at 3 showed progressive duodenal recovery. Very few cases of sprue-like enteropathy associated with ARBs other than olmesartan have been reported. Our case of telmisartan-associated enteropathy further suggests that sprue-like disease may be a class effect of ARBs.

Small bowel enteropathy associated with olmesartan medoxomil treatment.

Sprue-like enteropathy associated with treatment with olmesartan medoxomil, an angiotensin II receptor blocker, has been described recently. Herein, we report two patients who developed chronic severe non-bloody diarrhea, weight loss, and muscle wasting after prolonged use of olmesartan. Histologic and immunohistochemical examination of multiple duodenal biopsies revealed severe villous atrophy. Clinical signs ceased upon drug discontinuation. Physicians should be aware of this enteropathy even if olmesartan has been taken for months or years. Whether this adverse event is specific for olmesartan or is a class effect of angiotensin II receptor blockers is currently unknown. To the best of our knowledge, these case reports are the first reported in Greece.

Unspecified intestinal malabsorption in patients treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers: a retrospective analysis in primary care settings.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the possible relationship between the use of Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers (ARBs) or Angiotensin-Converting-Enzyme Inhibitors (ACE-i) and unspecified intestinal malabsorption (IM) within the Italian and German real-life context. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: a retrospective cohort of patients with a new unspecified IM diagnosis during the period 1 January 2010-31 December 2013 was extracted from Italian IMS Health Longitudinal Patient Database and German IMS Disease Analyzer. Only patients with at least one prescription of ARB or ACE-i medication during the 6 months preceding the IM diagnosis were included and then followed up for 12 months to assess treatment exposure. RESULTS: After stratification by year and molecule, the proportion of patients experiencing an unspecified IM diagnosis on total patients receiving ARBs or ACE-i ranged from 0% to 0.14%, showing no relevant differences between molecules and no time trends. CONCLUSIONS: this study indicates that ACE-i or ARBs were rarely associated to an unspecified IM diagnosis. No relevant difference between each specific ACE-i and ARB was highlighted.