Contrast extravasation mimicking intracerebral and intraventricular hemorrhage after intravenous thrombolytic treatment of ischemic stroke: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Although contrast extravasation on follow-up head computed tomography (CT) is frequently visualized after endovascular treatment, this phenomenon is rare after intravenous thrombolytic treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Here, we report a case of contrast extravasation mimicking intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) with intraventricular extension after intravenous thrombolytic treatment and computed tomography angiography (CTA). CASE PRESENTATION: A 52-year-old man presented with right-sided hemiparesis and hypoesthesia. Initial non-contrast head CT was negative for intracranial hemorrhage and acute ischemic changes. He received intravenous treatment with tenecteplase 3.8 h after the onset of stroke. CTA of the head and neck was performed at 4.3 h after stroke onset. It showed no stenosis or occlusion of the carotid and major intracranial arteries. At about 1.5 h after CTA, the right-sided hemiparesis deteriorated, accompanied by drowsiness, aphasia, and urinary incontinence. Immediate head CT showed hyperdense lesions with mild space-occupying effect in the left basal ganglia and both lateral ventricles. The hyperdense lesions were reduced in size on follow-up CT after 5 h. Two days later, CT showed that the hyperdense lesions in the lateral ventricles almost completely disappeared and only a small amount remained in the infarcted area. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast extravasation into the brain tissue and lateral ventricles, mimicking ICH with intraventricular extension, could occur after intravenous thrombolytic treatment and CTA in a patient with AIS, which might lead to misdiagnosis and wrong treatment of the patient. The rapid resolution of intracranial hyperdense lesions is key to differentiate contrast extravasation from ICH on serial non-enhanced CT.

Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase: A Comparison of Bleeding Outcomes in Massive Pulmonary Embolism (TACO-PE).

BACKGROUND: Thrombolysis is recommended in the setting of massive pulmonary embolism (PE) for reperfusion of vessels but carries a serious concern for increased bleed risk. In October 2022, our institution adopted tenecteplase as the formulary thrombolytic. Previous literature is unclear regarding the bleed risk of tenecteplase in massive PE, and no study has yet compared safety outcomes with the current standard of care, alteplase. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the incidence of bleeding with tenecteplase versus alteplase in massive PE patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational cohort study that included adults who received tenecteplase or alteplase for massive PE. The primary outcome was major bleeding as defined by the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH). Secondary outcomes included incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), in-hospital mortality, administration of reversal agents, and length of stay. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients met inclusion criteria with 20 patients in the alteplase cohort and 24 in the tenecteplase cohort. Seventeen percent of tenecteplase patients compared with 5% of alteplase patients experienced bleeding. The mortality rate was 83% vs 75%, respectively. In addition, 1 patient in the tenecteplase cohort experienced a symptomatic ICH and 2 patients required initiation of massive transfusion protocol. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Although this study was limited in sample size, these results suggest that there may be reason for concern of higher bleeding rates in patients treated with tenecteplase in the setting of massive PE.

Epidemiology of pulmonary embolism diagnosis and management among United States emergency departments over an eight-year period.

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. However, as diagnostic imaging, risk stratification tools, and treatment have evolved over time, there is a critical need for current data on the incidence, testing, admission rates, and medical management of PE in the ED setting. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of ED patients with PE diagnoses from 1/1/2016 to 12/31/2023 using the Epic Cosmos national database. ED visits were identified using ICD-10 codes corresponding to acute PE. Chronic PEs were excluded. Outcomes included total ED visits, admission rates, anticoagulant treatment prescribed from the ED, and thrombolytic therapy. Anticoagulant prescriptions included warfarin, enoxaparin, dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, and betrixaban. Thrombolytic agents included alteplase, tenecteplase, and urokinase. We also assessed changes in the overall rate of CT pulmonary angiograms (CTPA) performed. RESULTS: Out of 186,138,130 total ED encounters, PE represented 531,968 (0.29 %). The overall rate of PE diagnosis rose slowly from 0.20 % in 2016 to a peak of 0.35 % in 2021. Among those with PE, 363,584 (68.3 %) were admitted. The rate of admission declined over time from 75.6 % to 66.1 %. Among those prescribed anticoagulation, the most common medication was apixaban (40.0 %), followed by rivaroxaban (17.3 %), enoxaparin (6.1 %), warfarin (2.6 %), and dabigatran (0.4 %). Thrombolytics were administered in 4.5 % of cases, with the rate of thrombolytics peaking at 5.3 % in 2018 before lowering to 3.5 % in 2023. The overall rate of CTPA increased from 2.4 % to 5.0 %, while the rate of proportion of PEs diagnosed declined from 8.7 % to 6.4 %. CONCLUSION: This study highlights significant shifts in the epidemiology and management of PE within the ED setting. Overall rates of PE rose, while a larger proportion were discharged. Direct oral anticoagulants have become the predominant therapy with the majority of patients receiving apixaban. Thrombolytic use occurs in a small subset and has been declining over time. CTPA rates have risen, while the overall diagnostic yield has declined.

Management of high-risk pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: A narrative review.

BACKGROUND: High-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) is a complex, life-threatening condition, and emergency clinicians must be ready to resuscitate and rapidly pursue primary reperfusion therapy. The first-line reperfusion therapy for patients with high-risk PE is systemic thrombolytics (ST). Despite consensus guidelines, only a fraction of eligible patients receive ST for high-risk PE. OBJECTIVE: This review provides emergency clinicians with a comprehensive overview of the current evidence regarding the management of high-risk PE with an emphasis on ST and other reperfusion therapies to address the gap between practice and guideline recommendations. DISCUSSION: High-risk PE is defined as PE that causes hemodynamic instability. The high mortality rate and dynamic pathophysiology of high-risk PE make it challenging to manage. Initial stabilization of the decompensating patient includes vasopressor administration and supplemental oxygen or high-flow nasal cannula. Primary reperfusion therapy should be pursued for those with high-risk PE, and consensus guidelines recommend the use of ST for high-risk PE based on studies demonstrating benefit. Other options for reperfusion include surgical embolectomy and catheter directed interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency clinicians must possess an understanding of high-risk PE including the clinical assessment, pathophysiology, management of hemodynamic instability and respiratory failure, and primary reperfusion therapies.

Native aortic root thrombus leading to myocardial infarction in a single ventricle patient.

We report a 14-month-old male with hypoplastic left heart syndrome, mitral stenosis, and aortic stenosis with native aortic root thrombus. He developed a wide complex ventricular tachycardia and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with troponin I levels peaking at 388 ng/mL. He was treated safely with systemic alteplase with a resolution of his regional wall motion abnormality 18 hours later.

Mortality Outcomes with Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase in the Treatment of Massive Pulmonary Embolism.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary embolism (PE) leads to many emergency department visits annually. Thrombolytic agents, such as alteplase, are currently recommended for massive PE, but genetically modified tenecteplase (TNK) presents advantages. Limited comparative studies exist between TNK and alteplase in PE treatment. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the safety and mortality of TNK compared with alteplase in patients with PE using real-world evidence obtained from a large multicenter registry. Primary outcomes included mortality, intracranial hemorrhage, and blood transfusions. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the TriNetX Global Health Research Network. Patients aged 18 years or older with a PE diagnosis (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification code I26) were included. The following two cohorts were defined: TNK-treated (29 organizations, 266 cases) and alteplase-treated (22,864 cases). Propensity matching controlled for demographic characteristics, anticoagulant use, pre-existing conditions, and vital sign abnormalities associated with PE severity. Patients received TNK or alteplase within 7 days of diagnosis and outcomes were measured at 30 days post thrombolysis. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-three patients in each cohort were comparable in demographic characteristics and pre-existing conditions. Mortality rates at 30 days post thrombolysis were similar between TNK and alteplase cohorts (19.4% vs 19.8%; risk ratio 0.982; 95% CI 0.704-1.371). Rates of intracerebral hemorrhages and transfusion were too infrequent to analyze. CONCLUSIONS: This study found TNK to exhibit a similar mortality rate to alteplase in the treatment of PE with hemodynamic instability. The results necessitate prospective evaluation. Given the cost-effectiveness and ease of administration of TNK, these findings contribute to the ongoing discussion about its adoption as a primary thrombolytic agent for stroke and PE.

Conversion From Intravenous Alteplase to Tenecteplase for Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke Across a Large Community Hospital Health System.

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests tenecteplase at an intravenous dose of 0.25 mg/kg is as safe and efficacious as intravenous alteplase standard dose and demonstrates a more favorable pharmacokinetic profile for treatment of acute ischemic stroke. OBJECTIVE: The purpose was to compare the safety and efficacy of alteplase versus tenecteplase for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke at a large community hospital health system following conversion in the preferred formulary thrombolytic. METHODS: Prior to converting, medication safety and operationalization analyses were conducted. A multicenter, retrospective medical record review was performed for patients who received alteplase 6 months prior to formulary thrombolytic conversion and for tenecteplase 6 months post-conversion for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Primary outcomes included the rate of symptomatic intracranial and extracranial hemorrhage complications. Secondary outcomes included door-to-needle time, reduction in National Institute Health Stroke Scale at 24 hours and at discharge, order-to-administration time, and thrombolytic errors. The rates of hemorrhage were compared using binomial regression. RESULTS: Of the 287 patients reviewed, 115 received alteplase and 172 received tenecteplase. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhagic complications occurred in 1 patient (1%) who received alteplase compared with 3 patients (2%) who received tenecteplase (P = 0.9). There was no statistical difference in rates of symptomatic intracranial or extracranial hemorrhagic complications. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Conversion from alteplase to tenecteplase can be safely and effectively achieved at a large community hospital health system with differing levels of stroke certification. There were also additional cost savings and practical advantages including workflow benefits.

Impact of the lockdown on acute stroke treatments during the first surge of the COVID-19 outbreak in the Netherlands.

INTRODUCTION: We investigated the impact of the Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the resulting lockdown on reperfusion treatments and door-to-treatment times during the first surge in Dutch comprehensive stroke centers. Furthermore, we studied the association between COVID-19-status and treatment times. METHODS: We included all patients receiving reperfusion treatment in 17 Dutch stroke centers from May 11th, 2017, until May 11th, 2020. We collected baseline characteristics, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at admission, onset-to-door time (ODT), door-to-needle time (DNT), door-to-groin time (DGT) and COVID-19-status at admission. Parameters during the lockdown (March 15th, 2020 until May 11th, 2020) were compared with those in the same period in 2019, and between groups stratified by COVID-19-status. We used nationwide data and extrapolated our findings to the increasing trend of EVT numbers since May 2017. RESULTS: A decline of 14% was seen in reperfusion treatments during lockdown, with a decline in both IVT and EVT delivery. DGT increased by 12 min (50 to 62 min, p-value of < 0.001). Furthermore, median NIHSS-scores were higher in COVID-19 - suspected or positive patients (7 to 11, p-value of 0.004), door-to-treatment times did not differ significantly when stratified for COVID-19-status. CONCLUSIONS: During the first surge of the COVID-19 pandemic, a decline in acute reperfusion treatments and a delay in DGT was seen, which indicates a target for attention. It also appeared that COVID-19-positive or -suspected patients had more severe neurologic symptoms, whereas their EVT-workflow was not affected.

Quality and safety of Telemedicine in acute ischemic stroke: Early experience in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: Telemedicine helps to provide the safe management of stroke patients in the emergency department (ED) and has been used worldwide. However, we had limited experience of telestroke in Taiwan. We aimed to identify the quality of telestroke and compare it with the original face-to-face consultation model. METHODS: Among 178 consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients treated with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IVtPA) from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2019, we compared two different consultation methods: face-to-face consultation and telestroke consultation. We collected data on demographics, the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores, Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores, time measurements (onset-to-arrival time, onset-to-telestroke activation time, and time of IVtPA administration (Door-to-Needle; DTN)). RESULTS: The mean age to receive a telestroke consultation was 66.6 years, 36% were female, and the median NIHSS score was 9. The median time from patient arrival to telestroke consult activation was 40 min, and the median DTN time was 11 min longer than for face-to-face consults (62 min versus 51 min, p = .01). Telestroke consultation, similar to a face-to-face consultation, resulted in safe IVtPA eligibility assessments and administration with post-thrombolysis ICH in 4% overall (4% telestroke, 3% face-to-face consultation; p = .851). The 90-day outcomes were not different for mRS score, dichotomized 0-2 (60% telestroke 59% face-to-face consultation; p = .961), or for mortality (16% telestroke, 9% face-to-face consultation; p = .292). CONCLUSION: In the ED, consultation via the telestroke program provides equal quality to the original face-to-face consultation model to manage ischemic stroke.

Andexanet Alfa, the Possible Alternative to Protamine for Reversal of Unfractionated Heparin.

The recent shortage of protamine prompted an investigation of alternatives for reversal of unfractionated heparin. Heparin is an anticoagulant utilized in the hospital setting. Available options for anticoagulation include direct oral anticoagulants, vitamin K antagonists, thrombin inhibitors, low-molecular-weight heparins, and heparin. Protamine is the approved reversal agent for heparin with few alternatives under investigation. Although andexanet was designed as an antidote for apixaban and rivaroxaban, in vitro studies show that in a dose-dependent technique, andexanet had near full reversal of heparin, reversed anti-factor Xa activity, and neutralized anticoagulant effects of activated partial thromboplastin time and thrombin time induced by heparin.

The Potency of Seaweed Sulfated Polysaccharides for the Correction of Hemostasis Disorders in COVID-19.

Hemostasis disorders play an important role in the pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and outcome of COVID-19. First of all, the hemostasis system suffers due to a complicated and severe course of COVID-19. A significant number of COVID-19 patients develop signs of hypercoagulability, thrombocytopenia, and hyperfibrinolysis. Patients with severe COVID-19 have a tendency toward thrombotic complications in the venous and arterial systems, which is the leading cause of death in this disease. Despite the success achieved in the treatment of SARS-CoV-2, the search for new effective anticoagulants, thrombolytics, and fibrinolytics, as well as their optimal dose strategies, continues to be relevant. The wide therapeutic potential of seaweed sulfated polysaccharides (PSs), including anticoagulant, thrombolytic, and fibrinolytic activities, opens up new possibilities for their study in experimental and clinical trials. These natural compounds can be important complementary drugs for the recovery from hemostasis disorders due to their natural origin, safety, and low cost compared to synthetic drugs. In this review, the authors analyze possible pathophysiological mechanisms involved in the hemostasis disorders observed in the pathological progression of COVID-19, and also focus the attention of researchers on seaweed PSs as potential drugs aimed to correction these disorders in COVID-19 patients. Modern literature data on the anticoagulant, antithrombotic, and fibrinolytic activities of seaweed PSs are presented, depending on their structural features (content and position of sulfate groups on the main chain of PSs, molecular weight, monosaccharide composition and type of glycosidic bonds, the degree of PS chain branching, etc.). The mechanisms of PS action on the hemostasis system and the issues of oral bioavailability of PSs, important for their clinical use as oral anticoagulant and antithrombotic agents, are considered. The combination of the anticoagulant, thrombolytic, and fibrinolytic properties, along with low toxicity and relative cheapness of production, open up prospects for the clinical use of PSs as alternative sources of new anticoagulant and antithrombotic compounds. However, further investigation and clinical trials are needed to confirm their efficacy.

Value Utilization of Emergency Medical Services Air Transport in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

BACKGROUND: Determining whether a patient has a time-critical medical condition requiring helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) transportation is a challenge with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Although HEMS is largely accepted as improving outcomes in time-sensitive conditions, overtriage of patients ineligible for acute stroke therapies places patients and providers at unnecessary risk and wastes limited health care resources. OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify how accurate our triage system was at identifying high-yield EMS transfers. A better triage system would decrease the volume of low flight value HEMS transfers. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study during a 1-year period. Low flight value was defined by acute therapy eligibility and presenting medical status. RESULTS: Of 141 AIS patients transferred by HEMS, 23 (16%) were deemed of low flight value; 14 (61%) were outside the acute treatment time window for either intravenous tissue plasminogen activator or endovascular therapy (EVT); 5 patients (22%) were ineligible for EVT (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale < 6); 2 patients (9%) were ineligible for EVT (Modified Rankin Scale ≥ 3); and 2 patients (9%) were flown despite negative angiographic studies performed at transferring institution. Thirteen (57%) of the patients were interfacility transfers as opposed to direct HEMS transport from the field. CONCLUSIONS: HEMS transport for AIS patients plays a crucial role in delivering the best evidence-based care. However, a significant percent of patients did not meet criteria for its optimal utilization, most commonly due to expired treatment windows. Furthermore, low flight value transfers were initiated in spite of physician evaluation > 50% of the time. These results represent a unique opportunity to coordinate education and build effective triage paradigms across a system of stroke care.

Frostbite: Current status and advancements in therapeutics.

Frostbite is a severe ischemic injury which occurs due to the tissue vascular damage after sub-zero temperature tissue exposure. Deep frostbite can result in necrosis and may need amputation of affected tissue. Though a serious injury, it is not very well understood, and further scientific exploration is needed. This work explores the current understanding of the pathophysiology of frostbite. We reviewed the current status of the diagnostics, the drugs, the therapies and the surgical practices for prevention and management of frostbite. Advances in nanotechnology and drug delivery had improved the therapeutic outcomes significantly. This review also explored the latest advancements and researches done for development of newer therapeutics and diagnostics for frostbite care.

Assessment of Anticoagulation in Patients Receiving Ultrasound-Assisted Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-assisted, catheter-directed thrombolysis (USAT) has emerged as a popular treatment option for submassive pulmonary embolism (PE). The optimal strategy for transitioning patients from full-intensity to reduced-intensity heparin during the procedure has yet to be established. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to evaluate the anticoagulation management in patients receiving catheter-directed thrombolysis with USAT. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients who received USAT for the treatment of PE. Institutional review board approval was obtained. The primary objective was to determine the proportion of patients with a therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) prior to and during tissue-plasminogen activator (tPA) infusion. Secondary outcomes included heparin requirements, the rate of bleeding complications, and the appropriateness of long-term venous thromboembolism management. RESULTS: A therapeutic aPTT value was achieved in 32 patients (54.2%) prior to USAT and 35 patients (59.3%) during tPA infusion. Heparin requirements were reduced from 15.1 ± 4.1 to 12.8 ± 4.2 U/kg/h for patients who achieved a therapeutic aPTT both prior to and during tPA infusion. Bleeding occurred in 34.4% of patients and tended to be minimal (20.3%) or minor (10.9%). The majority of patients were discharged on a direct oral anticoagulant (63%), followed by warfarin (32%) and enoxaparin (5%). Conclusion and Relevance: To our knowledge, this is the first study that has assessed heparin management in the setting of USAT. The results of these data may aid in empirically dose adjusting unfractionated heparin to ensure safe and effective anticoagulation for patients receiving USAT.

Intrapleural Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Traumatic Retained Hemothorax.

Objective: To describe the efficacy, safety, dosing regimen, and administration technique of intrapleural alteplase for the treatment of retained hemothorax. Data Sources: A PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar search (January 2000 to February 2019) was conducted with the search terms intrapleural, fibrinolytic, fibrinolysis, alteplase, tissue plasminogen activator, and hemothorax. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Articles were included if they described the use of intrapleural alteplase in adult patients with a retained hemothorax; single patient case reports and abstracts were excluded. Data Synthesis: A total of 6 retrospective reviews and 1 meta-analysis were identified for inclusion. A variety of dosing strategies have been defined for the administration of intrapleural alteplase ranging from 6 to 100 mg, volume of fluid from 50 to 120 mL of normal saline, and the number of total doses has ranged from 1 to 8 over the treatment course. A majority of studies showed a greater than 80% success rate and less than 7% bleeding rate. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: Because of the paucity of data for use of alteplase in retained hemothorax and administration of a high-risk medication, this review provides dosing and administration recommendations based on reported safety and efficacy. Conclusion: Administration of intrapleural alteplase should be considered in patients with retained hemothorax as an alternative to surgical intervention. In contrast to intrapleural alteplase administration for other indications such as empyema, higher doses and volumes of alteplase are recommended for retained hemothorax.

Right Heart Thrombi: Patient Outcomes by Treatment Modality and Predictors of Mortality: A Pooled Analysis.

RATIONALE: Right heart thrombi (RiHT) is characterized by the presence of thrombus within the right atrium or right ventricle (RV). Current literature suggests pulmonary embolism (PE) with RiHT carries a high mortality. Guidelines lack recommendations in managing RiHT. We created a pooled analysis on RiHT and report on our institutional experience in managing RiHT. We aimed to evaluate whether patient characteristics and differing treatment modalities predict mortality. METHODS: We created a pooled analysis of case reports and series of patients with RiHT and PE between January 1956 and 2017. We also reviewed a series of consecutive patients with RiHT identified from our institutional PE registry. Age, shock, RV dysfunction, clot mobility, treatment modality, and hospital outcome had to be reported. RESULTS: We identified 316 patients in our pooled analysis. Patients received the following therapies: no treatment 15 (5%), systemic anticoagulation 73 (23%), systemic thrombolysis 108 (34%), surgical embolectomy 101 (32%), catheter-directed therapy 11 (3%), and systemic thrombolysis with surgery 8 (3%). In-hospital mortality was 18.7%. Univariate analysis showed age and shock reduced odds of survival. Multivariate analysis showed shock reduced odds of survival (odds ratios [OR] 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.19-0.72, P ≤ .01) while age, RV dysfunction, and clot-mobility did not affect mortality. In a reduced multivariate analysis adjusting for shock, treatment modality, and clot location alone, systemic thrombolysis increased odds of survival when compared to systemic anticoagulation (OR 2.72, 95% CI: 1.11-6.64, P = .02). Our institutional series identified 18 patients, where in-hospital mortality was 22.2%, 18 (100%) had RV dysfunction, and 5 (28%) had shock. Patients received the following therapies: systemic anticoagulation 8 (44.4%), systemic thrombolysis 4 (22.2%), surgical embolectomy 4 (22.2%), and catheter-directed thrombolysis 2 (11.1%). CONCLUSION: Presence of shock in RiHT is an independent predictor of mortality. Systemic thrombolysis may offer increased odds of survival when compared to systemic anticoagulation. Our findings should be interpreted with caution as they derive from retrospective reports and subject to publication bias.

Ticagrelor after pharmacological thrombolysis in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions: insight from a trial sequential analysis.

Few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared ticagrelor to clopidogrel after thrombolytic therapy in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). To assess the quality of the current evidence, a trial sequential analysis (TSA) of all the available RCTs was performed. A literature search through electronic databases for relevant RCTs was completed. Trial sequential boundaries were applied to the meta-analysis to guard against statistical error, calculate the information size (IS), and assess the quality of the currently available evidence. The safety outcome was bleeding at 30-days and the efficacy outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events at 30-days. There were 3 RCTs with a total of 3999 patients were included. For the safety and efficacy outcomes, there was no difference between the ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups (RR 0.94; 95% CI 0.56-1.60, p = 0.83) and (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.49-1.52, p = 0.62), respectively. The corresponding TSA revealed an IS of 20,928 and 37,266 for safety and efficacy outcomes, respectively. The Z-curves for both outcomes failed to cross the conventional boundary of significance and TSA boundary, indicating no statistical difference between the ticagrelor and clopidogrel group and lack of firm evidence from the currently available RCTs to draw conclusion. Based on the current available RCTs, there is not enough evidence to support or refute better outcomes with ticagrelor in patients with STEMI treated with thrombolytics. Larger RCTs with enough power are needed before firm recommendations can be applied.

Multiple boluses of alteplase followed by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for massive pulmonary embolism.

Thrombolytics and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are potential management options for massive pulmonary embolism (PE). There are early data supporting the use of repeated alteplase 50 mg bolus for massive PE. However, there is sparse literature addressing placement of ECMO catheters after systemic thrombolysis, and there are no reports of initiating ECMO after repeated bolus of alteplase. We present the case of a patient with massive PE who received two boluses of alteplase for recurrent cardiac arrest, followed by initiation of ECMO. The patient stabilized with these interventions, and ultimately had a good outcome with normal neurologic and functional status.

Systematic Review: The Role of Thrombolysis in Intermediate-Risk Pulmonary Embolism.

BACKGROUND: This systemic review provides practicing emergency physicians updated information about the role of thrombolysis in the treatment of intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism. METHODS: A PubMed literature search from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2018 was conducted and limited to human clinical trials written in English with relevant keywords. High-quality studies were identified and then underwent a structured review. Recommendations are made based on the literature review. RESULTS: Sixty-three articles met criteria for rigorous review, of which 13 were appropriate for citation in this review. Of these 13, there were 6 prospective studies and 7 retrospective studies. CONCLUSIONS: Thrombolysis, either catheter-directed or systemic, is a treatment option in the management of patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism and a high likelihood of clinical deterioration. Each method of thrombolysis carries risks and benefits. Based on the available evidence, transfer to a facility for the purpose of catheter-directed thrombolysis is not recommended.

No Weekend or After-Hours Effect in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Treated by Telemedicine.

BACKGROUND: Stroke outcomes have been shown to be worse for patients presenting overnight and on weekends (after-hours) to stroke centers compared with those presenting during business hours (on-hours). Telemedicine (TM) helps provide evaluation and safe management of stroke patients. We compared time metrics and outcomes of stroke patients who were assessed and received intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (IV-tPA) via TM during after-hours with those during on-hours. METHODS: Analysis of our TM registry from September 2015 to December 2016, identified 424 stroke patients who were assessed via TM and received IV-tPA. We compared baseline characteristics, clinical variables, time metrics, and outcomes between the after-hours (5 pm-7:59 am, weekends) and on-hours (weekdays 8 am-4:59 pm) patients. RESULTS: Of the 424 patients, 268 were managed via TM during after-hours, and 156 during on-hours. Baseline characteristics and clinical variables were similar between the groups. Importantly, there were no differences in all relevant time metrics including door to IV-tPA bolus time. IV-tPA complications (including all intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), any systemic bleeding, and angioedema), discharge disposition, and 90-day modified Rankin Scale were also similar in the groups. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in IV-tPA treatment times, acute stroke evaluation times, or mortality between the patients treated after-hours versus on-hours. Unlike in-person neurology coverage at many centers, the coverage provided by TM does not differ depending on the hour or day. Access to stroke specialists 24/7 via TM can ensure dependable and timely clinical care for acute stroke patients regardless of the time of day or day of the week.