RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Guidelines for the management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) are regularly published, yet little is known concerning adherence to recommendations in practice. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess adherence to European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) recommendations in patients with non-variceal UGIB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All hospitalized patients with an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) performed due to suspected non-variceal UGIB at our department were included in a prospective registry. Data between 2018-2020 from this registry were retrospectively analyzed. Adherence to the 2015 ESGE bleeding and propofol sedation guidelines was assessed. Adherence to recommendations concerning preendoscopic (risk) evaluation, preendoscopic PPI, transfusion management, and endoscopic management of peptic ulcers was analyzed. RESULTS: Among 1005 patients (mean age 70.4 years, 42.1% women) the most common bleeding etiologies were gastric or duodenal ulcers (16.8%), esophagitis/GERD (11.1%), and angiodysplasia (9.9%); mortality was 7.6%. Adherence to preendosopic risk evaluation was low, in 0% a Mallampati classification and in 37.5% an ASA scoring was documented. Preendoscopic PPI was started at 58.6%, and adherence to recommended transfusion management was >98%. Peptic ulcers were Forrest-graded in 72.8%. High-risk ulcers were treated appropriately in 77.9% and low-risk ulcers were not treated in 73.6%. Especially Forrest Ib ulcers were undertreated, with an adherence of 59.6%. Only 22/179 (12.3%) patients with peptic ulcers and early endoscopy were consistently managed according to ESGE recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to ESGE guidelines in patients with non-variceal UGIB is moderate to low, even at a tertiary university hospital. Strategies must be devised for guidelines to reach patients in everyday practice.
Asunto(s)
Úlcera Péptica , Úlcera , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Úlcera/complicaciones , Úlcera Péptica/complicaciones , Úlcera Péptica/terapia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/terapia , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a common emergency, with high rates of hospitalization and in-patient mortality compared to other gastrointestinal diseases. Despite readmission rates being a common quality metric, little data are available for UGIBs. This study aimed to determine readmission rates for patients discharged following an UGIB. METHODS: Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science were searched to October 16, 2021. Randomized and non-randomized studies that reported hospital readmission for patients following an UGIB were included. Abstract screening, data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted in duplicate. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed, with statistical heterogeneity measured using I2 . The GRADE framework, with a modified Downs and Black tool, was used to determine certainty of evidence. RESULTS: Seventy studies were included of 1847 screened abstracted, with moderate interrater reliability. Within these studies, 4 292 714 patients were analyzed with a mean age of 66.6 years, and 54.7% male. UGIB had a 30-day all-cause readmission rate of 17.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 16.7-18.2%), stratification revealed a higher rate for variceal UGIB [19.6% (95% CI 17.6-21.5%)] than non-variceal [16.8% (95% CI 16.0-17.5%)]. Only one third were readmitted due to recurrent UGIB (4.8% [95% CI 3.1-6.4%]). UGIB due to peptic ulcer bleeding had the lowest 30-day readmission rate [6.9% (95% CI 3.8-10.0%)]. Certainty of evidence was low or very low for all outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Almost one in five patients discharged after an UGIB are readmitted within 30 days. These data should prompt clinicians to reflect on their own practice to identify areas of strength or improvement.
Asunto(s)
Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas , Readmisión del Paciente , Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Femenino , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica/terapia , Hospitalización , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/complicacionesRESUMEN
Huangtu Decoction, first recorded in Essentials from the Golden Cabinet(Jin Kui Yao Lue) from ZHANG Zhong-jing in Han dynasty, is used to treat distal bleeding. It is mainly treated for the syndrome of failing to control blood with spleen-yang deficiency. The connotation of distal bleeding is more extensive, including not only upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the traditional sense such as peptic ulcer bleeding, gastrointestinal tumors, gastric mucosal lesions, vascular dysplasia, esophagogastric variceal bleeding, and pancreatic and biliary tract injury, but also other anorectal diseases such as part colon and rectal cancer swelling or polyps, hemorrhoids, and anal fissure and other parts of bleeding such as epistaxis, thrombocytopenia, functional uterine bleeding, threatened abortion, and unexplained hematuria. Distal bleeding also involves syndromes of failing to keep part deficient and cold fluids in interior, such as nocturia, enuresis, clear nose, sweating, cold tears, and leucorrhea, and excessive gastrointestinal bleeding caused by anti-plate and anticoagulant drugs, unexplained positive in the fecal occult blood test, and other modern clinical new problems. The indications of Huangtu Decoction include not only lower blood, defecation before blood, distant blood, hematemesis, epistaxis, and other diseases in traditional Chinese medicine, but also three types of clinical manifestations including bleeding, deficiency syndrome, and stagnant heat syndrome. In the clinic, Huangtu Decoction can be used to treat acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding, acute coronary syndrome complicated with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding, bleeding events caused by excessive antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs, unexplained positive in the fecal occult blood test, gastrointestinal tumor with bleeding, thrombocytopenia, and other acute and critical diseases. The dosage of Cooking Stove Earthkey, Rehmanniae Radix, and Asini Corii Colla in Huangtu Decoction is the key to hemostasis.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas , Trombocitopenia , Humanos , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/tratamiento farmacológico , Epistaxis , Anticoagulantes , Cuidados CríticosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the application of the bipolar electrocoagulation catheter via a peripheral-to-central (3 + 1) technique, relative to directly pressing only at the center of the bleeding site (direct-stroke), to effect endoscopic hemostasis of acute non-varicose gastrointestinal bleeding (ANVUGIB). METHODS: Patients (n = 148) with endoscopically diagnosed ANVUGIB were randomly apportioned to receive treatment by 3 + 1 (n = 78) or direct-stroke (n = 70) application of the bipolar electrocoagulation catheter. The 3 + 1 strategy required pressing at3 narrowly restricted sites equidistant peripheral and center to the site of bleeding. The rates of initial success, hemostasis time, and number of compressions were compared according to intention-to-treat (ITT) or per protocol (PP). RESULTS: The ITT (PP) rate of initial hemostatic success in patients receiving the 3 + 1 catheter was 91.02% (95.9%); and for the direct-stroke group was 71.42% (76.9%). For Forrest IIa lesions specifically, these rates were respectively 91.70% (97.1%) and 63.9% (67.6%). The ITT (PP) hemostasis times of the 3 + 1 and direct-stroke groups were 10.96 ± 3.28 (10.65 ± 2.90) and 14.27 ± 6.58 (14.12 ± 6.67) min; and the number of compressions numbered 5.73 ± 1.98 (5.42 ± 1.46) and 6.47 ± 2.82 (6.16 ± 2.47). CONCLUSION: During thermocoagulation treatment of ANVUGIB via bipolar electrocoagulation catheter, the 3 + 1 strategy showed a significantly higher rate of successful initial hemostasis relative to the direct-stroke technique, and shorter hemostasis time, with no increase in total procedural steps.
Asunto(s)
Hemostasis Endoscópica , Hemostáticos , Electrocoagulación/métodos , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/cirugía , Hemostasis , Hemostasis Endoscópica/métodos , HumanosRESUMEN
Objectives: To investigate the clinical efficacy of norepinephrine combined with cimetidine in the treatment of neonatal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage and its adverse reactions. Methods: A total of 68 cases of neonatal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in Huangshi Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital from please mention dates October 2018 to February 2020 were selected and randomly divided into treatment group and control group by coin tossing, with 34 infants in each group. The control group received conventional therapy, and the treatment group was additionally treated with norepinephrine combined with cimetidine. The efficacy and safety were compared between the two groups. Results: The time when the bleeding stops, the time of fecal occult blood turning negative and hospital stay of the treatment group were shorter than those of the control group (P < 0.05). Superoxide dismutase (SOD) level increased while malondialdehyde (MDA) level decreased in both groups after treatment compared with those before treatment (P < 0.05). After treatment, the SOD level was higher while the MDA level was lower in the treatment group than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The effective rate of the treatment group was higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05). However, no significance was found in adverse reactions between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Norepinephrine combined with cimetidine in the treatment of neonatal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage can shorten the recovery time of symptoms, improve efficacy and reduce stress reaction. It is safe, effective and worthy of use in clinical practice.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The assessment of the severity of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in emergency department (ED) patients is difficult to assess with commonly available diagnostic tools. Small studies have shown that video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is a promising risk-stratification method and may be better than current clinical decision rules such as the Rockall score and the Glasgow Blatchford score. This review aims to assess the accuracy of VCE to detect active upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage compared to a reference standard. METHODS: The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) methodology was used to perform a review of studies that have measured the diagnostic accuracy of VCE. Studies were included if they measured ED use of VCE for upper GI hemorrhage as compared to a reference standard of an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). A meta-analysis was performed on select patients using a fixed effects and random-effects model to determine the primary outcome of diagnostic test accuracy. RESULTS: 40 studies were screened for eligibility and five studies representing 193 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. All patients received both a VCE and an EGD. The sensitivity and specificity of VCE were 0.724 and 0.748, respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio was 6.29 (95% CI: 3.23-12.25) and the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.782. CONCLUSIONS: VCE demonstrated high accuracy for detecting upper GI hemorrhage in this meta-analysis of existing studies. In light of the potential advantages of VCE in the ED, further research is warranted to further establish its role.
Asunto(s)
Endoscopía Capsular/métodos , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Tracto Gastrointestinal Superior/anomalías , Adulto , Endoscopía Capsular/normas , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/fisiopatología , Humanos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Tracto Gastrointestinal Superior/irrigación sanguínea , Tracto Gastrointestinal Superior/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
This article presents the case of a 75-year-old male patient, who underwent a percutaneous abscess puncture of a liver abscess. A few days after the puncture and drainage there was a sudden onset of right upper quadrant abdominal pain accompanied by hematochezia. The patient presented with markedly elevated liver enzyme levels and a significant drop in hemoglobin concentration. After gastroscopy and abdominal computed tomography (CT) in the portal venous phase no bleeding source could be identified. A false aneurysm of the cystic artery was identified only after a CT angiography of the abdomen. Due to spontaneous cessation of the bleeding a cholecystectomy was subsequently performed for definitive treatment of the false aneurysm.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Aneurisma/diagnóstico por imagen , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Arteria Hepática/diagnóstico por imagen , Absceso Hepático/cirugía , Punciones/efectos adversos , Anciano , Aneurisma/cirugía , Colecistectomía , Drenaje , Arteria Hepática/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The Glasgow-Blatchford scale (GBS) classifies the risk of re-bleeding after upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) using clinical data, whereas the Forrest and Dagradi scales do it by endoscopy. OBJECTIVE: To assess GBS's ability to identify re-bleeding risk within 30 days of an UGIB, using endoscopy as the gold standard for comparison. METHOD: 129 medical records of patients with UGIB and endoscopy were analyzed. The Glasgow-Blatchford, Forrest and Dagradi scales were quantified; sensitivity, specificity and area under the ROC curve (AUC-ROC) of GBS-reported re-bleeding risk were calculated. RESULTS: GBS identified 53 patients with low re-bleeding risk (41.09 %) and 76 with high risk (58.91 %). Endoscopy identified 107 patients with non-variceal bleeding (82.94 %): 98 with low risk (89.9 %) and 11 with high risk (10.09 %); in addition, it identified 22 patients with variceal hemorrhage (17.05 %): 12 with low risk (54.54 %) and 10 with high risk (45.45 %). GBS showed a sensitivity of 0.857, specificity of 0.462 and an AUC-ROC of 0.660. CONCLUSIONS: GBS is simple, objective and useful to identify the risk of re-bleeding after UGIB; it is suggested as a triage tool in the emergency department. INTRODUCCIÓN: Con la escala de Glasgow-Blatchford (EG-B) se califica mediante datos clínicos, el riesgo de resangrado después de hemorragia del tubo digestivo alto (HTDA); y con las escalas de Forrest y Dagradi, mediante endoscopia. OBJETIVO: Evaluar la capacidad de la EG-B para identificar riesgo de resangrado a 30 días después de una HTDA; el estándar de oro de comparación fue la endoscopia. MÉTODO: Se analizaron 129 expedientes de pacientes con HTDA y endoscopia. Se cuantificaron las escalas de Glasgow-Blatchford, Forrest y Dagradi; se calculó sensibilidad, especificidad y área bajo la curva ROC (ABC-ROC) del riesgo de resangrado reportado por EG-B. RESULTADOS: La EG-B identificó a 53 pacientes con riesgo bajo de resangrado (41.09 %) y 76 con riesgo alto (58.91 %). Con la endoscopia se identificó a 107 pacientes con hemorragia no variceal (82.94 %), 98 con riesgo bajo (89.9 %) y 11 con riesgo alto (10.09 %); además, 22 pacientes con hemorragia variceal (17.05 %), 12 con riesgo bajo (54.54 %) y 10 con riesgo alto (45.45 %). La EG-B mostró sensibilidad de 0.857, especificidad de 0.462 y ABC-ROC de 0.660. CONCLUSIONES: La EG-B es sencilla, objetiva y útil para identificar riesgo de resangrado después de HTDA; se sugiere como herramienta de triaje en urgencias.
Asunto(s)
Endoscopía Gastrointestinal/normas , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico , Triaje/métodos , Área Bajo la Curva , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: We aimed to determine the rate of hospital readmission within 30 days of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage and its impact on mortality, morbidity, and health care use in the United States. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Readmission Database for the year 2014 (data on 14.9 million hospital stays at 2048 hospitals in 22 states). We collected data on hospital readmissions of 203,220 adults who were hospitalized for urgent non-variceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage and discharged. The primary outcome was rate of all-cause readmission within 30 days of discharge. Secondary outcomes were reasons for readmission, readmission mortality rate, morbidity (shock and prolonged mechanical ventilation) and resource use (length of stay and total hospitalization costs and charges). Independent risk factors for readmission were identified using Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: The 30-day rate of readmission was 13%. Only 18% of readmissions were due to recurrent non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The rate of death among patients readmitted to the hospital (4.7%) was higher than that for index admissions (1.9%) (P < .01). A higher proportion of readmitted patients had morbidities requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation (1.5%) compared with index admissions (0.8%) (P < .01). A total of 133,368 hospital days was associated with readmission, and the total health care in-hospital economic burden was $30.3 million (in costs) and $108 million (in charges). Independent predictors of readmission were Medicaid insurance, higher Charlson comorbidity score, lower income, residence in a metropolitan area, hemorrhagic shock, and longer stays in the hospital. Older age, private or no insurance, upper endoscopy, and prolonged mechanical ventilation were associated with lower odds for readmission. CONCLUSIONS: In a retrospective study of patients hospitalized for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage, 13% are readmitted to the hospital within 30 days of discharge. Readmission is associated with higher mortality, morbidity, and resource use. Most readmissions are not for recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Esófago/epidemiología , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/epidemiología , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Respiración Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Choque Hemorrágico/epidemiología , Gastropatías/epidemiología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Bases de Datos Factuales , Endoscopía del Sistema Digestivo , Femenino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Recursos en Salud/economía , Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Renta/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Masculino , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Readmisión del Paciente/economía , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Población UrbanaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Research showed that the mortality of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (UGH) complicated with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) was higher than single UGH in elderly patients. This study aimed to determine the risk factors that associated with an increased risk of ACS occurrence after UGH. METHODS: A population-based nested case-control study was conducted analyzing the hospital information system database of Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University from September 1, 2009 to December 31, 2014. We included 3217 elderly patients who experienced a UGH, among which 152 cases were identified and matched 604 selected controls. Multivariate conditional logistic regression models were used to characterize risk factors associated with ACS occurrence and death after UGH. RESULTS: Diabetes (odds ratio (OR)â¯=â¯1.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13-2.71, Pâ¯=â¯0.039), smoking (ORâ¯=â¯1.87, 95% CI 1.19-2.73, Pâ¯=â¯0.028), vasopressin or terlipressin use (ORâ¯=â¯1.51, 95% CI 1.02-2.14, Pâ¯=â¯0.043), liver cirrhosis (ORâ¯=â¯2.43, 95% CI 1.45-4.38, Pâ¯=â¯0.013), hemoglobin level (ORâ¯=â¯2.36, 95% CI 1.65-3.79, Pâ¯=â¯0.014) and history of ACS (ORâ¯=â¯1.98, 95% CI 1.13-3.49, Pâ¯=â¯0.017) increased risk of ACS incidence in elderly patients with UGH. Moreover, diabetes (ORâ¯=â¯2.14, 95% CI 1.15-4.21, Pâ¯=â¯0.041), smoking (ORâ¯=â¯2.93, 95% CI 1.17-5.31, Pâ¯=â¯0.043) and hemoglobin levels (ORâ¯=â¯1.95, 95% CI 1.24-3.16, Pâ¯=â¯0.038) were independent variables for the mortality underwent UGH with ACS in elderly patients. CONCLUSIONS: History of diabetes, vasopressin or terlipressin use, smoking, liver cirrhosis, hemoglobin level and history of ACS are risk factors to develop ACS in elderly patients with UGH. Importantly, diabetes, smoking and lower hemoglobin level are key variables for mortality.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo/complicaciones , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/complicaciones , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/mortalidad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , China/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Femenino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/mortalidad , Humanos , Incidencia , Cirrosis Hepática/epidemiología , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Fumar/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Several risk scoring systems exist for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). The clinical Rockall score (clinical RS) and the Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS) are major risk scores that consider only clinical data. Computed tomography (CT) findings are equivocal in non-variceal UGIB. We compared CT findings with clinical data to predict mortality, rebleeding and need for endoscopic therapy in non-variceal UGIB patients. This retrospective, single-center study included 386 patients admitted to our emergency department with diagnosis of non-variceal UGIB by urgent endoscopy between January 2009 and March 2015. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to investigate CT findings and risk factors derived from clinical data. CT findings could not significantly predict mortality and rebleeding in non-variceal UGIB patients. However, upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in CT findings better predicted the need for endoscopic therapy than clinical data. The adjusted odds ratios were 10.10 (95% CI 5.01-20.40) for clinical RS and 10.70 (95% CI 5.08-22.70) for the GBS. UGI hemorrhage in CT findings could predict the need for endoscopic therapy in non-variceal UGIB patients in our emergency department. CT findings as well as risk score systems may be useful for predicting the need for endoscopic therapy.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with and without gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) to determine whether GIB increases the risks of thromboembolism and death. METHODS: We collected data from 522 patients with acute severe GIB and 1044 patients without GIB (control subjects, matched for age, sex, year of diagnosis, history of thromboembolism, and use of antithrombotic drugs) who underwent endoscopy at the National Center for Global Health and Medicine in Japan from January 2009 through December 2014. Hazard ratios of GIB for thromboembolism and mortality risk were estimated, adjusting for confounders. We also compared standardized mortality ratios between the GIB cohort and the age- and sex-matched general population in Japan. RESULTS: During a mean follow up of 23.7 months, thromboembolism was identified in 11.5% of patients with GIB and 2.4% of control subjects (hazard ratio, 5.3; 95% confidence interval, 3.3-8.5; P < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed GIB as a risk factor for all-thromboembolic events, cerebrovascular events, and cardiovascular events. During a mean follow-up of 24.6 months, 15.9% of patients with GIB and 8.6% of control subjects died (hazard ratio, 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-2.9; P < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed GIB as a risk factor for all-cause mortality. Compared with the general population, patients with GIB were at increased risk of death (standardized mortality ratio, 12.0). CONCLUSIONS: In a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing endoscopy in Japan, we identified acute GIB was a significant risk factor for late thromboembolism and death, compared with patients without GIB. GIB also increased risk of death compared with the general population.
Asunto(s)
Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/complicaciones , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/mortalidad , Tromboembolia/epidemiología , Tromboembolia/mortalidad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Análisis de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
Purpose To identify the characteristics and evaluate the long-term outcomes of endovascular treatment of Budd-Chiari syndrome with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Methods Forty-seven consecutive Budd-Chiari syndrome patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage were referred for the treatment with percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty, and subsequently underwent follow-up. Data were retrospectively collected and follow-up observations were performed at 1, 2, 2-5, and 5-8 years postoperatively. Results Cirrhosis was presented in 16 patients, and splenoportography reviewed obvious varices in 18 patients. Percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty was technically successful in all patients. Major procedure-related complications occurred in 3 of the 47 patients (6.38%). The cumulative 1, 2, 2-5, and 5-8 year primary patency rates were 100% (46/46), 93.2% (41/44), 90.9% (40/44), and 86.4% (19/22), respectively. The cumulative 1, 2, 2-5, and 5-8 year secondary patency rates were 100% (47/47), 100% (44/44), 100% (44/44), and 95.5% (21/22), respectively. Mean and median duration of primary patency was 65.17 ± 3.78 and 69.0 ± 5.69 months, respectively. No upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage recurred during follow-ups. The mean survival time was 66.97 ± 3.61 months and the median survival time was 69.0 ± 4.10 months. Conclusion PTBA was an effective treatment that can prevent recurrence of the life-threatening complications and ensured long-term satisfactory clinical outcomes for Budd-Chiari syndrome patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Percutaneous transhepatic variceal embolization was not recommended for all Budd-Chiari syndrome patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage.
Asunto(s)
Angioplastia de Balón , Síndrome de Budd-Chiari/terapia , Embolización Terapéutica , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Angioplastia de Balón/efectos adversos , Síndrome de Budd-Chiari/complicaciones , Síndrome de Budd-Chiari/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Budd-Chiari/fisiopatología , Embolización Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Femenino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/fisiopatología , Gastroscopía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Flebografía , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hepatic portal venous gas (HPVG) is very rare; it is associated with multiple gastrointestinal etiologies, with pathophysiology not yet fully understood. It is characteristically fast-progressing and has a high mortality rate. Treatment choice depends on the etiology, including conservative and surgical management. CASE PRESENTATION: We report an adult patient (less than 25 years old) of HPVG combined with acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage, in which massive gas in the hepatic portal vein system by computed tomography of the abdomen was rapidly dissipated by nasogastric decompression conservative management. CONCLUSION: Nasogastric decompression can be an effective treatment approach for HPVG when timely surgical treatment is not required.
RESUMEN
Acute esophageal necrosis (AEN), known as black oesophagus or Gurvit's syndrome, is an extremely rare clinical syndrome. Patients usually present with life-threatening symptoms of upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage (70-90% of cases), as in this case report. Diagnosis of AEN is confirmed based on oesophagogastroduodenoscopy which reveals diffuse or patchy circumferential black necrotic oesophageal mucosa. The presented patient had some comorbidities, such as poorly controlled diabetes mellitus, secondary to chronic pancreatitis, hypertension, after cholecystectomy, addiction to alcohol and tobacco, and taking a small spoon of baking soda three times a day for a few months because of heartburn. Despite the poor prognosis of AEN, with mortality about 32-35%, most patients present with endoscopic improvement in short time - from 7 days to 1 month. Fortunately, the patient did not to have any complications in the course of AEN, and the treatment was effective.
Asunto(s)
Necrosis , Humanos , Masculino , Esófago/patología , Esófago/cirugía , Enfermedades del Esófago/patología , Enfermedades del Esófago/etiología , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
The number of patients with high bleeding risk (HBR) and high thromboembolic risk (HTR) is increasing. Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIH), acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and pulmonary embolism (PE) are representative conditions due to HBR/HTR. Although these disorders are located at opposite ends of the same disease spectrum, this does not mean a patient with HBR cannot have a concomitant HTR. The clinical manifestation of these two risks mostly results in critically ill patients for whom management means a huge challenge. We have numerous well-structured guidelines about treating GIH, ACS, or PE, but the literature and recommendations about the concomitant onset of these diseases are limited. Expert recommendations suggest an integrative, comprehensive assessment of patient and intervention-related factors to decide on the antithrombotic regimen with the best clinical benefit by assessing thrombotic and bleeding risks. In general, if thrombotic factors predominate, a longer duration, more aggressive antithrombotic regimen should be planned, and if bleeding susceptibility is higher, a shorter duration, de-escalated regimen should be pursued. In this study, we aimed to explore the clinical dilemmas involved by presenting two cases with delicate management.
RESUMEN
Acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (UGIH) is the most common emergency condition that requires rapid endoscopic treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of pre-endoscopic intravenous metoclopramide on endoscopic mucosal visualization (EMV) in patients with acute UGIH. This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind controlled trial of participants diagnosed with acute UGIH. All participants underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy within 24 h. Participants were assigned to either the metoclopramide or placebo group. Modified Avgerinos scores were evaluated during endoscopy. In total, 284 out of 300 patients completed the per-protocol procedure. The mean age was 62.8 ± 14.3 years, and 67.6% were men. Metoclopramide group achieved a higher total EMV and gastric body EMV score than the other group (7.34 ± 1.1 vs 6.94 ± 1.6; P = 0.017 and 1.80 ± 0.4 vs 1.64 ± 0.6; P = 0.006, respectively). Success in identifying lesions was not different between the groups (96.5% in metoclopramide and 93.6% in placebo group; P = 0.26). In the metoclopramide group, those with active variceal bleeding compared with the control group demonstrated substantial improvements in gastric EMV (1.83 ± 0.4 vs 1.28 ± 0.8, P = 0.004), antral EMV (1.96 ± 0.2 vs 1.56 ± 0.6, P = 0.003), and total EMV score (7.48 ± 1.1 vs 6.2 ± 2.3, P = 0.02). Pre-endoscopic intravenous metoclopramide improved the quality of EMV in variceal etiologies of UGIH, which was especially prominent in those who had signs of active bleeding based on nasogastric tube assessment.Trial Registration: Trial was registered in Clinical Trials: TCTR 20210708004 (08/07/2021).
Asunto(s)
Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal , Masculino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Metoclopramida/uso terapéutico , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/complicaciones , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal/efectos adversos , Administración Intravenosa , Método Doble CiegoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended for cirrhotic patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). However, the frequency of bacterial infection in such patients has remarkably decreased over the decades, which has reduced the necessity for prophylaxis. Therefore, here we investigated the real-world adherence and effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in cirrhotic patients with UGIB in Japan. METHODS: This population-based study was conducted with a Japanese real-world database of the Health, Clinic, and Education Information Evaluation Institute. We enrolled cirrhotic patients who were hospitalized for UGIB between April 2010 and March 2020. After those who died within 24 h and who had aspiration pneumonia at admission were excluded, 1232 patients were analyzed. Rates of 6-week mortality, in-hospital bacterial infection, 30-day readmission, and length of hospital stay were evaluated. RESULTS: Prophylactic antibiotics were prescribed in 142 (11.5%) patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that antibiotic prophylaxis was not significantly associated with either 6-week mortality or bacterial infection. After propensity score matching, the rates of 6-week mortality (7.2% vs. 8.4%, P = 0.810), bacterial infection (9.6% vs. 4.2%, P = 0.082), and 30-day unexpected readmission (7.2% vs. 7.8%, P = 1.000) were similar in patients with and without prophylaxis, whereas the median length of hospital stay was significantly longer in patients with prophylaxis (17 days vs. 13 days, P = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Under current real-world circumstances in Japan, prophylactic antibiotics were prescribed in only 11.5% of cirrhotic patients with UGIB and were not associated with better clinical outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Profilaxis Antibiótica , Infecciones Bacterianas , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Cirrosis Hepática/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/prevención & control , Infecciones Bacterianas/prevención & control , Antibacterianos/efectos adversosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare and observe the therapeutic effect of octreotide and pituitrin in upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage caused by cirrhosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, open, single-blind, controlled, and single-center study, patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage induced by cirrhosis were divided into control group (treated with pituitrin) and experimental group (treated with octreotide). The effective time, hemostasis time, and average bleeding volume of the two groups were observed and recorded, and the incidence of adverse reactions, rebleeding rate, and total effective rate of the two groups were compared. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-two patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage caused by cirrhosis were included from March 2017 to September 2018. By a single-blind method, the patients were randomly divided into control group (n = 66) and experimental group (n = 66). Compared with the control group, the effective time and hemostasis time of the drug were significantly shorter in the experimental group, whereas the average bleeding volume of patients was lower (average P < 0.05). Compare with the control group, the total effective rate was higher in the experimental group, whereas the incidence of adverse reactions was lower (average P < 0.05). During 1-year follow-up, early and late rebleeding rates and hemorrhage-related mortality between the two groups have no difference (average P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: In the treatment of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in cirrhosis, octreotide is superior to pituitrin, with advantages of quick onset, short hemostasis time, and less adverse reactions, which is helpful to control the rebleeding rate and bleeding-related mortality.
Asunto(s)
Octreótido , Hormonas Neurohipofisarias , Humanos , Octreótido/uso terapéutico , Método Simple Ciego , Estudios Prospectivos , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Cirrosis Hepática/tratamiento farmacológico , Hormonas Neurohipofisarias/uso terapéutico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Balloon tamponade of bleeding varices is a temporizing measure acting as a bridge for the treatment of massive gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage. After treatment, utilization of a gastric tube for feeding is challenging due to the risk of variceal rebleeding during placement. No literature to date has explored the use of the suction ports of a tamponade device as an alternative form of enteral access for medication and feeding administration in critically ill patients. We report a case of the novel use of a Minnesota tube for enteral feeds and medication administration in a critically ill patient awaiting liver transplantation after massive upper GI bleeding.