Surgeons lack of agreement on determining preoperative radiographic and clinical shoulder balance in adolescent and adult idiopathic scoliosis patients.

PURPOSE: Preoperative shoulder balance is an important factor in determining the upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV). In adolescent and adult idiopathic scoliosis (AIS/AdIS) patients, we studied the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of spinal surgeons' assessment of preoperative shoulder balance using X-rays (XR) and anterior/posterior photographs. METHODS: An observational review of a prospective multicenter database (AIS Lenke Type 1/5/6) and prospective single-institution database (AdIS) was conducted. Ten spine surgeons reviewed AIS cases; 12 spine surgeons reviewed AdIS cases. Surgeons rated the higher shoulder: left/right/same/unsure. Reliability was calculated using Fleiss' kappa coefficient. RESULTS: Among 145 Type 1 AIS cases, intraobserver reliability was moderate-to-substantial: XR (κ = 0.59), anterior photographs (κ = 0.68), posterior photographs (k = 0.65). Interobserver reliability was fair to moderate for XR (κ = 0.31), anterior photographs (κ = 0.20), and posterior photographs (κ = 0.30). Among 52 Type 5/6 AIS cases, intraobserver reliability was substantial: XR (κ = 0.70), anterior photographs (κ = 0.76), posterior photographs (κ = 0.71). Interobserver reliability was fair to moderate for XR (κ = 0.49), anterior photographs (κ = 0.47), and posterior photographs (κ = 0.36). Among 66 AdIS cases, intraobserver reliability was substantial: XR (κ = 0.68), anterior photographs (κ = 0.67), posterior photographs (κ = 0.69). Interobserver reliability was moderate for XR (κ = 0.45), anterior photographs (κ = 0.43), posterior photographs (κ = 0.49). Within Type 1 AIS patients, attendings had better intraobserver reliabilities compared to fellows using X-rays (κ = 0.61 vs. 0.53), yet no effect of surgeon experience was seen with clinical photographs. CONCLUSION: Though surgeons' ability to agree with themselves was moderate to substantial, surgeons' ability to agree with each other was fair to moderate. Combined measures to assess preoperative shoulder balance are needed for UIV selection.

Strap stabilization for proximal junctional kyphosis prevention in instrumented posterior spinal fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective, single-institution, cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association of Mersilene tape use and risk of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), after surgical correction of adult spinal deformity (ASD) by posterior instrumented fusion (PIF). PJK, following long spinal PIF, is a complication which often requires reoperation. Mersilene tape, strap stabilization of the supra-adjacent level to upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) seems a preventive measure. METHODS: Patients who underwent PIF for ASD with Mersilene tape stabilization (case group) or without (control group) between 2006 and 2016 were analyzed preoperatively to 2-year follow-up. Matching of potential controls to each case was performed. Radiographic sagittal Cobb angle (SCA), lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, and pelvic incidence were measured pre- and postoperatively, using a deformity measuring software program. PJK was defined as progression of postoperative junctional SCA at UIV ≥ 10°. RESULTS: Eighty patients were included: 20 cases and 60 controls. The cumulative rate of PJK ≥ 10° at 2-year follow-up was 15% in cases versus 38% of controls (OR = 0.28; P = 0.04) with higher latent period in cases, (20 vs. 7.5 months), P = 0.018. Mersilene tape decreased risk of PJK linked with the impact of the following confounders: age, ≥ 55 years old (OR = 0.19; 0.02 ≥ P ≤ 0.03); number of spinal levels fused 7-15 (OR = 0.13; 0.02 ≥ P ≤ 0.06); thoracic UIV (T12-T1) (OR = 0.13; 0.02 ≥ P ≤ 0.06); BMI ≥ 27 kg/m2 (OR = 0.22; 0.03 ≥ P ≤ 0.08); and osteoporosis (OR = 0.13; 0.02 ≥ P ≤ 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Mersilene tape at UIV + 1 level decreases the risk of PJK following PIF for ASD. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Is there an optimal upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) tilt angle to prevent post-operative shoulder imbalance and neck tilt in Lenke 1 and 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients?

PURPOSE: To investigate whether an optimal upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) tilt angle would prevent 'lateral' shoulder imbalance or neck tilt (with 'medial' shoulder imbalance) post-operatively. METHODS: The mean follow-up for 60 AIS (Lenke 1 and Lenke 2) patients was 49.3 ± 8.4 months. Optimal UIV tilt angle was calculated from the cervical supine side bending radiographs. Lateral shoulder imbalance was graded using the clinical shoulder grading. The clinical neck tilt grading was as follows: Grade 0: no neck tilt, Grade 1: actively correctable neck tilt, Grade 2: neck tilt that cannot be corrected by active contraction and Grade 3: severe neck tilt with trapezial asymmetry >1 cm. T1 tilt, clavicle angle and cervical axis were measured. UIVDiff (difference between post-operative UIV tilt and pre-operative Optimal UIV tilt) and the reserve motion of the UIV were correlated with the outcome measures. Patients were assessed at 6 weeks and at final follow-up with a minimum follow-up duration of 24 months. RESULTS: Among patients with grade 0 neck tilt, 88.2 % of patients had the UIV tilt angle within the reserve motion range. This percentage dropped to 75.0 % in patients with grade 1 neck tilt whereas in patients with grade 2 and grade 3 neck tilt, the percentage dropped further to 22.2 and 20.0 % (p = 0.000). The occurrence of grade 2 and 3 neck tilt when UIVDiff was <5°, 5-10° and >10° was 9.5, 50.0 and 100.0 %, respectively (p = 0.005). UIVDiff and T1 tilt had a positive and strong correlation (r 2 = 0.618). However, UIVDiff had poor correlation with clavicle angle and the lateral shoulder imbalance. CONCLUSION: An optimal UIV tilt might prevent neck tilt with 'medial' shoulder imbalance due to trapezial prominence and but not 'lateral' shoulder imbalance.

Rule breakers achieve successful shoulder balance: unraveling the myth of upper instrumented vertebrae selection criteria.

PURPOSE: This study compared shoulder balance outcomes in "rule breakers" (RB) vs. "rule followers" (RF) based on commonly utilized upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV) selection guidelines. METHODS: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients (Lenke 1-4) who underwent posterior spine fusion (PSF) with minimum 2-year follow-up had radiographic measurement of shoulder balance including first rib angle (FRA), T1 tilt, coracoid process height difference (CPHD), and clavicle angle (CA) at preop, postop, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year timepoints. Postoperative outcomes were compared between RB and RF groups defined based on the UIV selection guidelines of Rose and Lenke. RESULTS: Among 88 patients (43 RF, 45 RB), age, gender, preoperative T1 tilt, FRA, CA, and CPHD were not significantly different between groups (p > 0.05). Immediately post-surgery, the RF group had more balanced shoulders (CPHD: 11.6 mm vs. 15.7 mm, p = 0.033; CA: 2.8° vs. 3.6°, p = 0.045; FRA: 3.4° vs. 5.1°, p = 0.009; T1 tilt: 4.7° vs. 6.1°, p = 0.045). At 2 years, no difference was observed between RF vs. RB in CA (2.3 vs. 2.2°, p = 0.857) and CPHD (8.5 vs. 8.1 mm, p = 0.791). FRA and T1 tilt were higher in RB vs. RF (FRA: 4.6 vs. 2.9°, p = 0.002; T1 tilt: 5.6 vs. 3.9, p = 0.008). Shoulder balance (CPHD < 1 cm) was achieved in 73.1% of RB and 69.9% of RF at 2-year follow-up (p = 0.216). CONCLUSION: Adherence to commonly accepted UIV selection guidelines did not predict better shoulder balance. The RB group had worse shoulder balance immediately post-surgery, but also improved more over time. These results suggest the need to refine current UIV selection and management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Selective thoracolumbar fusion in adult spinal deformity double curves with circumferential minimally invasive surgery: 2-year minimum follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: Selection of the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) level for adult spinal deformity (ASD) remains controversial. Although selective fusion attempts have been described for fractional curves or adolescent curves, no authors have described selective thoracolumbar fusion performance for ASD with double curves. This study evaluated the clinical impact of selective fusion constructs within the lower thoracic and/or lumbar spine on ASD with double curves. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on an ASD (Cobb angle > 20°, sagittal vertical axis [SVA] > 50 mm, and pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis mismatch [PI-LL] > 10°) database consisting of 438 patients who underwent correction with circumferential minimally invasive surgery (CMIS) between 2007 and 2020. The inclusion criteria were ASD double curves (lumbar Cobb angle > 35° and thoracic Cobb angle > 30°), 4 or more levels fused, and minimum 2-year follow-up. Analyses were performed on spinopelvic data and clinical outcome scores. Complications were recorded, specifically the need for revision surgery and hardware-related complications. RESULTS: Twenty-one ASD double curve patients underwent selective correction with a mean ± SD (range) follow-up of 91 ± 43 (24-174) months. A total of 141 levels were fused with a mean of 6.7 ± 1.3 (4-8) levels. T10 was the most proximal and most common UIV (10/21 [48%]). Pelvic fixation was performed in 12 patients (57%). Significant improvements in lumbar Cobb angle, thoracic Cobb angle, coronal balance, lumbar lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, SVA, and PI-LL were achieved. The uninstrumented thoracic spine demonstrated 14.5° of mean coronal correction and a mean increase of 9.4° in kyphosis. Significant improvements in visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were observed. Four patients required revision for the following reasons: 1) superficial wound infection requiring irrigation and debridement; 2) bilateral L5 pars fractures requiring L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion and pelvic fixation; 3) adjacent-segment degeneration at L5-S1 requiring anterior lumbar interbody fusion and pelvic fixation; and 4) proximal junctional kyphosis requiring revision fusion to include the entire thoracic curve. There were no instances of hardware failure such as rod breakage or screw loosening. CONCLUSIONS: Selective thoracolumbar fusion with CMIS for ASD double curves can provide significant clinical improvements. Despite limiting fusion constructs to within the lower thoracic and/or lumbar spine, significant correction can be observed in the uninstrumented thoracic curve. The rate of mechanical complications was low, and the 2-year follow-up results suggested that limited fusion constructs are viable options for ASD double curve patients.

Proximal fusion constructs in minimally invasive scoliosis surgery are successful without interbody or intertransverse fusion.

OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive techniques are increasingly used in adult deformity surgery as surgeon familiarity improves and long-term data are published. Concerns raised in such cases include pseudarthrosis at levels where interbody grafts are not utilized. Few previous studies have specifically examined the thoracolumbar component of long surgical constructs, which is commonly instrumented without interbody or intertransverse fusion. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on all patients who underwent hybrid minimally invasive deformity corrections in two academic spine centers over a 9-year period. Inclusion criteria were at least 2 rostral levels instrumented percutaneously, ranging from T8 to L1 as the upper end of the construct. Fusion assessment was made using CT when possible or radiography. Common radiographic parameters and clinical variables were assessed pre- and postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients fit the inclusion criteria. Baseline characteristics included a 1:1.8 male/female ratio, average age of 65.7 years, and BMI of 30.2 kg/m2. Follow-up imaging was obtained at a mean of 35.7 months. The average number of levels fused was 7.5, with an average of 3.4 instrumented percutaneously between T8 and L1, representing a total of 120 rostral levels instrumented percutaneously. Fusion assessment was performed using CT in 69 levels and radiography in 51 levels. Among the 120 rostral levels instrumented percutaneously, robust fusion was noted in 25 (20.8%), with 53 (44.2%) exhibiting some evidence of fusion. Pseudarthrosis was noted in 2 rostral segments (1.7%). There were no instances of proximal hardware revision. Eight patients exhibited radiographic proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK; 22.2%), none of whom underwent surgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS: In the present series of adult patients with scoliosis undergoing thoracolumbar deformity correction, rostral segments instrumented percutaneously have a very low rate of pseudarthrosis, with radiographic evidence of bone fusion occurring in more than 60% of patients. The rate of PJK was acceptable and similar to other published series.

Flexibility assessment of the unfused thoracic segments above the "potential upper instrumented vertebrae" using the supine side bending radiographs in Lenke 5 and 6 curves for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Selection of upper instrumented vertebra for Lenke 5 and 6 curves remains debatable, and several authors have described different selection strategies. OBJECTIVE: This study analyzed the flexibility of the unfused thoracic segments above the "potential upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV)" (T1-T12) and its compensatory ability in Lenke 5 and 6 curves using supine side bending (SSB) radiographs. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study was used. PATIENT SAMPLE: This study comprised 100 patients. OUTCOME MEASURES: The ability of the unfused thoracic segments above the potential UIV, that is, T1-T12, to compensate in Lenke 5 and 6 curves was determined. We also analyzed postoperative radiological outcome of this cohort of patients with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. METHODS: Right and left SSB were obtained. Right side bending (RSB) and left side bending (LSB) angles were measured from T1 to T12. Compensatory ability of thoracic segments was defined as the ability to return to neutral (center sacral vertical line [CSVL]) with the assumption of maximal correction of lumbar curve with a horizontal UIV. The Lenke 5 curves were classified as follows: (1) Lenke 5-ve (mobile): main thoracic Cobb angle <15° and (2) Lenke 5+ve (stiff): main thoracic Cobb angle 15.0°-24.9°. This study was self-funded with no conflict of interest. RESULTS: There were 43 Lenke 5-ve, 31 Lenke 5+ve, and 26 Lenke 6 curves analyzed. For Lenke 5-ve, >70% of thoracic segments were able to compensate when UIV were at T1-T8 and T12 and >50% at T9-T11. For Lenke 5+ve, >70% at T1-T6 and T12, 61.3% at T7, 38.7% at T8, 3.2% at T9, 6.5% at T10, and 22.6% at T11 were able to compensate. For Lenke 6 curve, >70% at T1-T6, 69.2% at T7, 19.2% at T8, 7.7% at T9, 0% at T10, 3.8% at T11, and 34.6% at T12 were able to compensate. There was a significant difference between Lenke 5-ve versus Lenke 5+ve and Lenke 5-ve versus Lenke 6 from T8 to T11. There were no significance differences between Lenke 5+ve and Lenke 6 curves from T1 to T11. CONCLUSIONS: The compensatory ability of the unfused thoracic segment of Lenke 5+ve curves was different from the Lenke 5-ve curves, and it demonstrated characteristics similar to the Lenke 6 curves.

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of upper thoracic versus lower thoracic upper instrumented vertebrae for adult scoliosis: a meta-analysis

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of upper thoracic (UT) versus lower thoracic (LT) upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV) for adult scoliosis by meta-analysis. We conducted a literature search in three databases to retrieve related studies up to March 15, 2017. The preliminary screened studies were assessed by two reviewers according to the selection criteria. All analyses were carried out using the statistical software package R version 2.31. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to describe the results. The I2 statistic and Q statistic test were used for heterogeneity assessment. Egger's test was performed to detect publication bias. To assess the effect of each study on the overall pooled OR or standardized mean difference (SMD), sensitive analysis was conducted. Ten trials published between 2007 and 2015 were eligible and included in our study. Meta-analysis revealed that the UT group was associated with more blood loss (SMD=0.4779, 95%CI=0.3349-0.6209, Z=6.55, P<0.0001) and longer operating time (SMD=0.5780, 95%CI=0.1971-0.958, Z=2.97, P=0.0029) than the LT group. However, there was no significant difference in Oswestry Disability Index, Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) function subscores, radiographic outcomes including sagittal vertical axis, lumbar lordosis, and thoracic kyphosis, length of hospital stay, and revision rates between the two groups. No evidence of publication bias was found between the two groups. Fusion from the lower thoracic spine (below T10) has as advantages a shorter operation time and less blood loss than upper thoracic spine (above T10) in posterior long-segment fixation for degenerative lumbar scoliosis.