Physicochemical Stability Study of the Morphine-Bupivacaine-Ziconotide Association.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the physicochemical stability of morphine-bupivacaine-ziconotide mixtures used in intrathecal analgesia in polypropylene syringes and intrathecal pumps. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The stability study method was conceived according to International Council for Harmonisation guidelines. For propylene syringes, six different mixtures of morphine-bupivacaine and ziconotide were assessed over seven days. Two storage temperatures were tested (5 °C ± 3 °C and 25 °C ± 2 °C). For implantable pumps, nine different mixtures were assessed over 60 days and stored at 37 °C. Assays were performed using ultrahigh-pressure liquid chromatography. Turbidity and pH also were measured throughout the study. RESULTS: Results confirmed excellent physicochemical stability for morphine and bupivacaine in the study for all conditions investigated (pumps at 37 °C, polypropylene syringes at 5 °C ± 3 °C and 25 °C ± 2 °C). Concerning ziconotide, after seven days, our study showed that every 95% confidence interval calculated had lower bounds >90% for all mixtures stored in polypropylene syringes. In implantable pumps, a decrease of the concentration was observed in all the mixtures studied. Moreover, the appearance of a degradation product confirmed the ziconotide degradation. CONCLUSION: All results are in favor with a physicochemical stable preparation for six mixture profiles when stored in polypropylene syringes at 5 °C ± 3 °C and 25 °C ± 2 °C. For mixtures stored in implantable pumps, the efficacy should decrease over time owing to the degradation of ziconotide. A trade-off between high morphine concentration and increased refill interval will need to be found by clinicians.

Bibliometric Review of the Literature on Cone Snail Peptide Toxins from 2000 to 2022.

The venom of marine cone snails is mainly composed of peptide toxins called conopeptides, among which conotoxins represent those that are disulfide-rich. Publications on conopeptides frequently state that conopeptides attract considerable interest for their potent and selective activity, but there has been no analysis yet that formally quantifies the popularity of the field. We fill this gap here by providing a bibliometric analysis of the literature on cone snail toxins from 2000 to 2022. Our analysis of 3028 research articles and 393 reviews revealed that research in the conopeptide field is indeed prolific, with an average of 130 research articles per year. The data show that the research is typically carried out collaboratively and worldwide, and that discoveries are truly a community-based effort. An analysis of the keywords provided with each article revealed research trends, their evolution over the studied period, and important milestones. The most employed keywords are related to pharmacology and medicinal chemistry. In 2004, the trend in keywords changed, with the pivotal event of that year being the approval by the FDA of the first peptide toxin drug, ziconotide, a conopeptide, for the treatment of intractable pain. The corresponding research article is among the top ten most cited articles in the conopeptide literature. From the time of that article, medicinal chemistry aiming at engineering conopeptides to treat neuropathic pain ramped up, as seen by an increased focus on topological modifications (e.g., cyclization), electrophysiology, and structural biology.

Ziconotide for the Management of Cancer Pain: A Budget Impact Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Recent recommendations on starting dose, smaller dose increments, and longer intervals between dose increase have the potential to increase the safety of ziconotide administration in addition to improving its value for money. Ziconotide is not routinely commissioned in England, with one of the concerns being whether it represents the best use of resources. The aim of this project is to conduct a budget impact analysis to estimate the costs or savings associated with the changes in ziconotide dosage in addition to its use in combination with morphine for the management of cancer pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An open, Markov-like cohort decision analytic model was developed to estimate the budget impact of ziconotide in combination with morphine (ziconotide combination therapy) vs morphine monotherapy through intrathecal drug delivery (ITDD) for the management of cancer pain. The perspective adopted was that of the UK National Health Service, with a five-year time horizon. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate different scenarios. RESULTS: Ziconotide combination therapy was more expensive than treatment with morphine monotherapy. The total costs of ziconotide combination therapy and morphine monotherapy for the first year were £395,748 and £136,628 respectively. The estimated five-year cumulative budget impact of treatment with ziconotide combination therapy for the five-year time horizon was £2,487,539, whereas that of morphine monotherapy was £913,804. The additional costs in any of the first five years are below the resource impact significance level of £1 million for medical technologies in England. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this budget impact analysis suggest that although a combination of intrathecal ziconotide in combination with morphine is associated with higher costs to the health care system in England, the incremental costs are not significant. Routine commissioning of ziconotide alone or in combination with morphine would provide an alternative for a population with limited ITDD treatment options.

Physicochemical Stability Study of the Morphine-Ropivacaine-Ziconotide Association in Implantable Pumps for Intrathecal Administration.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the physicochemical stability of morphine-ropivacaine-ziconotide mixtures used in intrathecal analgesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight mixtures were studied to assess their stability profiles according to the initial drug concentrations used. The solutions obtained were put in implantable pumps and stored at 37 °C over a period of 60 days. Assays were performed using ultra high-pressure liquid chromatography. Turbidity and pH were also measured throughout the study. RESULTS: Results confirmed excellent physicochemical stability for morphine and ropivacaine. Concerning ziconotide, three of the eight mixtures did not show any sign of chemical instability: average concentrations remained constant throughout the 60 days. A decrease of the concentration was observed for the five other mixtures. Moreover, the appearance of a degradation product linked to oxidation confirmed the ziconotide degradation. CONCLUSIONS: All these results are in favor of a physicochemical stable preparation for three of the mixture profiles when stored in implantable pumps at 37 °C up to 60 days. For the five others, the efficacy should decrease over time owing to the degradation of ziconotide. The decrease in kinetics of the ziconotide concentration depends on the mixing profile. One possibility is to adapt the filling intervals according to the profile of the mixture. Finally, the results show the period of stability ensuring maximum analgesic efficacy for the eight mixture profiles studied.

Conotoxin Patenting Trends in Academia and Industry.

Sea snails of the genus Conus produce toxins that have been the subjects of numerous studies, projects, publications, and patents over the years. Since Conus toxins were discovered in the 1960s, their biological activity has been thought to have high pharmaceutical potential that could be explored beyond the limits of academic laboratories. We reviewed 224 patent documents related to conotoxins and conopeptides globally to determine the course that innovation and development has taken over the years, their primary applications, the technological trends over the last six years, and the leaders in the field, since the only previous patent review was performed in 2015 and focused in USA valid patents. In addition, we explored which countries/territories protect their inventions and patents and the most relevant collaborations among assignees. We also evaluated whether academia or pharmaceutical companies are the future of conotoxin research. We concluded that the 224 conotoxin patents reviewed in this study have more academic value than industrial value, which was noted by the number of active patents that have not yet been licensed and the contributions to medical research, especially as tools to study neuropathic pain, inflammation, immunology, drug design, receptor binding sites, cancer, neurotransmission, epilepsy, peptide biosynthesis, and depression. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the current state of conotoxin patents, their main applications, and success based on the number of licensing and products in the market.

Short-Term Outcomes of a High-Volume, Low-Concentration Bolus Starting Dose Technique With Ziconotide: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There have been numerous recommendations for a starting dose of intrathecal ziconotide. The therapy remains underutilized partially due to reports of inefficacy and/or intolerance. This study describes short-term outcomes of a high-volume, low-concentration bolus (HVLC-B) ziconotide starting dose technique for patients with chronic spine pain. Intrathecal pumps are available with a Patient Therapy Manager (PTM), or patient-controlled intrathecal bolus device. Commonly published recommendations for a bolus dose has been 10% of the daily dose. This article describes an inversion of the traditional 10% rule-of-thumb. This article describes using the basal rate at a lowest programmable dose and utilizing the bolus for the majority of the medication delivery. Such an inversion may be considered a high volume bolus. The lowest commercially available concentration of ziconotide from the manufacturer is 25 mcg/mL. Pope and Deer (Neuromodulation, 18, 414-420 [2015]) described use of a dilution down to 5 mcg/mL. For purposes of this article, such dilutions to one-fifth of the commercially available solution are considered sufficiently dilute to qualify for the term "low concentration." Furthermore, the patients in this analysis received dilutions down to one-fiftieth of the lowest commercially available solution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A case series of patients with chronic spine pain with or without radicular pain received a starting dose intrathecal ziconotide regimen based on a specific HVLC-B technique. Efficacy, tolerability, and pump settings are reported and analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 17 patients were identified who started ziconotide with the specified HVLC-B starting regimen. One of the 17 patients reported side effects that led to discontinuation of the therapy, although the side effect was not typical of ziconotide but rather likely attributable to other medications the patient was taking. Fifteen of the 17 reported improved pain control with intrathecal ziconotide. Sixteen of the 17 patients remained on intrathecal ziconotide throughout the 4.7-month average follow-up period. One patient who failed to obtain pain relief chose to remain on the therapy because of reported resolution of lower limb numbness. CONCLUSIONS: The HVLC-B starting regimen was effective and well tolerated in this short-term study of patients with chronic spine pain. More studies are needed to better elucidate long-term outcomes in larger patient populations.

Stability Study of Admixtures Combining Ziconotide With Morphine or Sufentanil in Polypropylene Syringes.

BACKGROUND: The association of morphine ziconotide or sufentanil ziconotide was used to manage cancer pain. Moving these patients is sometimes difficult. In order to transport these syringes for pump refilling, it could be interesting to demonstrate the stability of the mixture and so to be able to ensure the best transport conditions of syringes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A stability indicating UPLC-DAD method was developed and validated according to the ICH guidelines. Fur mixtures of each association have been stored in 5 ± 3°C and 25 ± 2°C and were evaluated for seven days and compared to the initial observed concentrations. RESULTS: The stability of these associations was demonstrated at 5°C for seven days thanks to relative concentrations (95% confidence intervals of the mean of three samples) systematically positioned between 95% and 105%. No degradation product was observed during the stability study. CONCLUSION: This study shows the stability of these association morphine ziconotide or sufentanil ziconotide at 5°C for seven days in polypropylen syringes. This result will allow the transport of the preparation under optimal conditions. Advance preparations for intrathecal pump refills could also be feasible.

[What became of Prialt®? : Observational study on the use of ziconotide in the treatment of chronic pain]. / Was wurde eigentlich aus Prialt®? : Beobachtungsstudie über den Langzeiteinsatz von Ziconotid in der Behandlung chronischer Schmerzen.

BACKGROUND: Prialt® was approved by the European Medicine Agency in February 2005. Besides morphine, it is the only analgesic approved for long-term intrathecal infusion in the treatment of chronic pain. As it does not bind to opioid receptors, its use in the treatment of chronic pain seemed to be safer and to lead to less adverse events compared with morphine. However, it is an orphan drug and studies of its long-term use are rare. QUESTIONS: What role does Prialt® play in the treatment of chronic pain compared with other analgesics given intrathecally? What impact do the initial dose and the rate of infusion have on the analgesic effect and on the incidence of side effects? MATERIAL AND METHODS: Medical reports were used to identify all patients receiving ziconotide monotherapy from February 2005 to the end of the analysis period in October 2018 in our department. Furthermore, a questionnaire was created and given to the patients to find out more about their experience with ziconotide. RESULTS: The study included 12 patients, all of whom suffered from at least one adverse event. The most common adverse events were forgetfulness and paraesthesia, each affecting 25% of the patients. One third of the patients discontinued ziconotide therapy due to severe adverse events. The mean initial dose was 1.98 µg/day. DISCUSSION: Ziconotide was used at the Jena University Hospital according to the latest guidelines. Nevertheless, morphine and other opioid analgesics are still more frequently used in the intrathecal management of chronic pain. There are various reasons for this, but the narrow therapeutic index, the high incidence of adverse events, and the difficulties in finding the right dose are among the most important.

Intracerebroventricular administration of N-type calcium channel blocker ziconotide displays anticonvulsant, anxiolytic, and sedative effects in rats: A preclinical and pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: Ziconotide (ω-conotoxin MVIIA peptide) is a novel analgesic agent acting on voltage-gated calcium channels and is administered intrathecally for neuropathic pain. While antiepileptic activities of other types of calcium channel blockers (T- or L-type) are well established, there is no information regarding the effect of ziconotide as an N-type calcium channel antagonist in pentylenetetrazol-induced seizures or its anxiolytic and sedative activities. The present study is the first to report on these effects. METHODS: To evaluate the anticonvulsant activity of ziconotide in the pentylenetetrazol (60 mg/kg) seizure model, ziconotide was administered intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) as a single dose (1 µg/rat) or repeatedly (chronic administration: 0.1, 0.3, or 1 µg/rat once a day for seven days). The anxiolytic and sedative actions of ziconotide were evaluated with the elevated plus maze, light/dark (LD) box, and pentobarbital-induced sleep tests. Immediately after behavioral testing, the amygdala was completely removed bilaterally to determine corticosterone levels by immunoassay. RESULTS: In all dosing regimens, ziconotide significantly decreased the seizure frequency and also delayed the latency period compared with control. Chronic administration affected the percentage of mortality protection, while a single dose of ziconotide did not. In behavioral tests, ziconotide significantly increased both the number of entries and the percentage of time spent in the open arms of the elevated plus maze. Furthermore, ziconotide significantly increased the latency period and the number of entries into the light compartment during the LD box examination. Chronic administration of ziconotide significantly reduced the latency to sleep and increased sleeping time, whereas these parameters were not affected by a single dose. Additionally, amygdala corticosterone levels were significantly decreased in rats treated with ziconotide compared with control. CONCLUSION: Ziconotide displays beneficial neurobehavioral effects in a model of epilepsy with anxiety as its comorbid event. It seems that at least one of the mechanisms involved in these effects is associated with a decrease in brain corticosterone levels. The main advantage of ziconotide over benzodiazepines (routine anxiolytic and sedative drugs) is that it does not cause tolerance, dependency, and addiction. Therefore, more than ever, it is necessary to improve the convenience of drug delivery protocols and attenuate the adverse effects associated with ziconotide-based therapies.

Effectiveness and Safety of Intrathecal Ziconotide: Final Results of the Patient Registry of Intrathecal Ziconotide Management (PRIZM).

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Patient Registry of Intrathecal Ziconotide Management evaluated the long-term effectiveness and safety of intrathecal ziconotide. METHODS: The study was a prospective, multicenter observational study of intrathecal ziconotide in US clinical practice. Patients were adults with severe chronic pain that warranted intrathecal therapy. Ziconotide was initiated as the single agent in the pump; however, other intrathecal medications were permitted. The primary efficacy outcome was ≥30% reduction in numeric pain rating scale score from baseline at week 12. A secondary outcome was patient global impression of change. Adverse events were solicited at each visit. RESULTS: The registry enrolled 93 patients. Seventy-four and 28 patients completed 12 weeks and 18 months of treatment, respectively. In the overall patient population, 17.4% had ≥30% pain reduction from baseline at week 12, with a mean reduction in pain of 10.9%. At month 18, 38.5% of patients had ≥30% pain reduction from baseline, with a mean pain reduction of 24.7%. Patient-rated improvement was reported in 67% of patients at week 12 and 71% at month 18. Almost all patients experienced adverse events, the most common of which were nausea (25.8%), confusional state (22.6%), and dizziness (20.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Final study analyses showed that intrathecal ziconotide provided clinically meaningful pain relief in 17.4% and 38.5% of patients at week 12 and month 18, respectively. At these same time points, patient-rated improvement was reported in at least two-thirds of patients. The safety profile was consistent with that listed in the ziconotide prescribing information.

Study of Physicochemical Stability of Ziconotide in Medication Cassette Reservoir.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the physicochemical stability of ziconotide solutions for intrathecal administration in the Medication Cassette Reservoir (MCR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A stability indicating UPLC-DAD method was developed and validated according to the ICH guidelines. Two mixtures of ziconotide (0.40 µg/mL and 0.60 µg/mL) stored in MCR stored at 25 ± 2°C were evaluated for 14 days and compared to the initial observed concentrations. RESULTS: The physicochemical stability of the two solutions was demonstrated for two days thanks to relative concentrations, pH measurement, visual inspections, and turbidity assays. A degradation product was observed and increased during the study. CONCLUSION: This study showed a very low physicochemical stability of diluted ziconotide stored at 25 ± 2°C in the MCR. The intrathecal administration of ziconotide does not seem appropriate with this device for outpatients.

Intrathecal Therapy for Chronic Pain: A Review of Morphine and Ziconotide as Firstline Options.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the evidence for morphine and ziconotide as firstline intrathecal (IT) analgesia agents for patients with chronic pain. METHODS: Medline was searched (through July 2017) for "ziconotide" or "morphine" AND "intrathecal" AND "chronic pain," with results limited to studies in human populations. RESULTS: The literature supports the use of morphine (based primarily on noncontrolled, prospective, and retrospective studies) and ziconotide (based on randomized controlled trials and prospective observational studies) as first-choice IT therapies. The 2016 Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC) guidelines recommended both morphine and ziconotide as firstline IT monotherapy for localized and diffuse chronic pain of cancer-related and non-cancer-related etiologies; however, one consensus point emphasized ziconotide use, unless contraindicated, as firstline IT therapy in patients with chronic non-cancer-related pain. Initial IT therapy choice should take into consideration individual patient characteristics (e.g., pain location, response to previous therapies, comorbid medical conditions, psychiatric history). Trialing is recommended to assess medication efficacy and tolerability. For both morphine and ziconotide, the PACC guidelines recommend conservative initial dosing strategies. Due to its narrow therapeutic window, ziconotide requires careful dose titration. Ziconotide is contraindicated in patients with a history of psychosis. IT morphine administration may be associated with serious side effects (e.g., respiratory depression, catheter tip granuloma), require dose increases, and cause dependence over time. CONCLUSION: Based on the available evidence, morphine and ziconotide are recommended as firstline IT monotherapy for cancer-related and non-cancer-related pain. The choice of first-in-pump therapy should take into consideration patient characteristics and the advantages and disadvantages of each medication.

TAT-Modified ω-Conotoxin MVIIA for Crossing the Blood-Brain Barrier.

As the first in a new class of non-opioid drugs, ω-Conotoxin MVIIA was approved for the management of severe chronic pains in patients who are unresponsive to opioid therapy. Unfortunately, clinical application of MVIIA is severely limited due to its poor ability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier (BBB), reaching the central nervous system (CNS). In the present study, we have attempted to increase MVIIA's ability to cross the BBB via a fusion protein strategy. Our results showed that when the TAT-transducing domain was fused to the MVIIA C-terminal with a linker of varied numbers of glycine, the MVIIA-TAT fusion peptide exhibited remarkable ability to cross the bio-membranes. Most importantly, both intravenous and intranasal administrations of MVIIA-TAT in vivo showed therapeutic efficacy of analgesia. Compared to the analgesic effects of intracerebral administration of the nascent MVIIA, these systemic administrations of MVIIA-TAT require higher doses, but have much prolonged effects. Taken together, our results showed that TAT conjugation of MVIIA not only enables its peripheral administration, but also maintains its analgesic efficiency with a prolonged effective time window. Intranasal administration also rendered the MVIIA-TAT advantages of easy applications with potentially reduced side effects. Our results may present an alternative strategy to improve the CNS accessibility for neural active peptides.

Effectiveness and Safety of Intrathecal Ziconotide: Interim Analysis of the Patient Registry of Intrathecal Ziconotide Management (PRIZM).

BACKGROUND: The Patient Registry of Intrathecal Ziconotide Management (PRIZM) evaluated long-term effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of intrathecal ziconotide treatment in clinical practice. METHODS: Patient Registry of Intrathecal Ziconotide Management was an open-label, long-term, multicenter, observational study of adult patients with severe chronic pain. This interim analysis (data through July 10, 2015) of ziconotide as the first vs. not first intrathecal agent in pump included change from baseline in the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS; primary efficacy measure) and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scores. RESULTS: Enrollment closed at 93 patients; data collection was ongoing at the time of this interim analysis. Fifty-one patients (54.8%) received ziconotide as the first agent in pump (FIP+), whereas 42 (45.2%) did not (FIP-). Mean (SD) baseline NPRS scores were 7.4 (1.9) and 7.9 (1.6) in FIP+ and FIP- patients, respectively. Mean (SEM) percentage changes in NPRS scores were -29.4% (5.5%) in FIP+ patients (n = 26) and +6.4% (7.7%) in FIP- patients (n = 17) at month 6 and -34.4% (9.1%) in FIP+ patients (n = 14) and -3.4% (10.2%) in FIP- patients (n = 9) at month 12. Improvement from baseline, measured by PGIC score, was reported in 69.2% of FIP+ (n = 26) and 35.7% of FIP- (n = 14) patients at month 6 and 85.7% of FIP+ (n = 7) and 71.4% of FIP- (n = 7) patients at month 12. The most common adverse events (≥ 10% of patients overall as of the data cut) were nausea (19.6% vs. 7.1% of FIP+ vs. FIP- patients, respectively), confusional state (9.8% vs. 11.9%), and dizziness (13.7% vs. 7.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Greater improvements in efficacy outcomes were observed when ziconotide was initiated as first-line intrathecal therapy vs. not first intrathecal agent in pump. The adverse event profile was consistent with the ziconotide prescribing information.

Validated chromatographic method for the simultaneous determination of eight drugs (morphine, ropivacaine, bupivacaine, baclofen, clonidine, sufentanil, fentanyl and ziconotide) for intrathecal analgesia.

Intrathecal analgesia has increased over the past two decades in various indications: chronic refractory pain from cancerous or non-cancerous origins, spasticity. These different indications involve the use of different molecules alone or in combination such as morphine, ropivacaine, bupivacaine, fentanyl, sufentanil, clonidine, baclofen and ziconotide. Pump refills are prepared at the pharmacy under a laminar flow hood. An analytical control should be carried out before release of the preparation. A new method of analytical control by chromatography has been developed and validated according to the International Conference on Harmonization guideline in order to secure the production process.

Use of Low Dose Ziconotide as First-Line Intrathecal Monotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Ziconotide use in intrathecal drug therapy (IDT) has been limited by dosing related side effects. We examine our experience with ziconotide as a first line IDT monotherapy in patients with chronic pain and present our low and slow dosing algorithm aimed at reducing these patient experienced side effects while adequately managing pain. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed demographics, dosing, and outcomes of 15 consecutive patients with complete three-month data sets implanted with intrathecal pain pumps more than three years utilizing ziconotide as a first-line monotherapy. RESULTS: Ziconotide response was assessed at visit 5 (69 ± 10 days) and responders were characterized by having 30% or greater improvement in numerical rating scale scores (n = 7), or activities of daily living (ADL) (n = 7). Eight of our patients had a response in at least one measure (53%). In our eight responders, NRS score decreased from 8.4 ± 0.7 at baseline (consult visit) to 2.4 ± 1.0 at 2.6 months and 4.0 ± 1.3 at most recent follow-up, mean of 12.9 months after implant. We noted that our responders tended to have neuropathic pain with an objective etiology. Initial dosing in 12 patients was 1.2 mcg/day (range for the other three patients was 0.6-1.4). Following initial dosing, visits were at 2-4 week intervals with mean titration doses between 1.1 and 2.8 mcg/day. Slight dizziness in two patients and transient urinary retention in one patient occurred, all resolving with dose reduction. No patients had discontinued use at three-month follow-up. DISCUSSION: We present our experience with low and slow ziconotide IDT as a first-line monotherapy, which showed no side effects resulting in discontinuation of the medication at three-month follow-up. Using a conservative dosing strategy, we were able to effectively treat 53% of patients.

The Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC): Recommendations for Intrathecal Drug Delivery: Guidance for Improving Safety and Mitigating Risks.

INTRODUCTION: Intrathecal therapy is an important part of the pain treatment algorithm for chronic disease states. The use of this option is a viable treatment strategy, but it is inherent for pain physicians to understand risk assessment and mitigation. In this manuscript, we explore evidence and mitigating strategies to improve safety with intrathecal therapy. METHODS: A robust literature search was performed covering January 2011 to October 9, 2016, in PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Biomed Central, Google Scholar, Current Contents Connect, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts. The information was cross-referenced and compiled for evidence, analysis, and consensus review, with the intent to offer weighted recommendations and consensus statements on safety for targeted intrathecal therapy delivery. RESULTS: The Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference has made several best practice recommendations to improve care and reduce morbidity and mortality associated with intrathecal therapy through all phases of management. The United States Prevention Service Task Force evidence level and consensus strength assessments are offered for each recommendation. CONCLUSION: Intrathecal therapy is a viable and relatively safe option for the treatment of cancer- and noncancer-related pain. Continued research and expert opinion are required to improve our current pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model of intrathecal drug delivery, as this will undoubtedly improve safety and efficacy.

Intrathecal Therapy for Cancer-Related Pain.

OBJECTIVE: The increasing incidence of cancer survivorship has shifted treatment of cancer-related pain from short-term analgesia to long-term chronic pain management. As a result, alternatives to oral analgesics, such as intrathecal therapy, may be beneficial for patients with cancer-related pain. The authors review the use of intrathecal therapy in the management of cancer-related pain. METHODS: The Medline database was searched for English-language articles that included "ziconotide" or "morphine" AND ("cancer" OR "malignant") AND "intrathecal" in title or abstract. Available abstracts from scientific congresses in the areas of neuromodulation and oncology were also reviewed. RESULTS: Intrathecal therapy provides pain relief with reduced systemic concerns in patients with cancer-related pain. Patients should undergo multidisciplinary evaluation and, in most cases, drug trialing before intrathecal pump implantation. Morphine, an opioid ( Μ: -opioid receptor antagonist), and ziconotide, a nonopioid (selective N-type calcium channel inhibitor), are both approved for intrathecal analgesia; however, tolerance and safety concerns may deter the use of intrathecal morphine. Ziconotide has also shown efficacy for reduction of cancer-related pain; however, proper dosing and titration must be used to prevent adverse events. There is little information available on use of intrathecal therapies specifically in cancer survivors. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of cancer-related pain has shifted toward chronic pain management strategies, especially among cancer survivors. Intrathecal therapy provides an alternate route of administration of chronic pain medications (e.g., morphine and ziconotide) for cancer patients with and without active disease, although additional research is needed to support effectiveness in cancer survivors.

Intrathecal Ziconotide: Dosing and Administration Strategies in Patients With Refractory Chronic Pain.

INTRODUCTION: Ziconotide is a non-opioid analgesic for intrathecal (IT) administration. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive and clinically relevant summary of the literature on dosing and administration with IT ziconotide in the management of refractory chronic pain, and to describe novel dosing strategies intended to improve clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Medline search was conducted for "ziconotide," supplemented by manual searching of published bibliographies and abstracts from conferences. RESULTS: Early experience with IT ziconotide in clinical trials combined with improved understanding of drug pharmacokinetics in the cerebrospinal fluid have led to a reappraisal of approaches to trialing and initiation of continuous-infusion therapy in an effort to improve tolerability. The traditional paradigm of trialing by inpatient continuous infusion may be shifting toward outpatient trialing by IT bolus, although definitions of success and specific protocols remain to be agreed upon. Expert consensus on IT continuous infusion with ziconotide suggests a starting dose of 0.5 to 1.2 mcg/day followed by dose titration of ≤0.5 mcg/day on a no more than weekly basis, according to individual patients' pain reductions and regimen tolerability. DISCUSSION: Newer modalities that include patient-controlled analgesia and nocturnal flex dosing have been shown to hold promise of further improvements in ziconotide efficacy and tolerability. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical trials and experience confirm the feasibility and usefulness of IT ziconotide in the management of refractory chronic pain. Emerging evidence suggests that additional IT delivery options may further expand the usefulness and benefits of ziconotide.