Continuing use of antithrombotic medications for patients with bleeding gastroduodenal ulcer requiring endoscopic hemostasis: a case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare clinical characteristics and outcomes of bleeding gastroduodenal ulcer between patients taking antithrombotic medications and those not taking antithrombotic medications. METHODS: We performed a case-control study of 346 patients with endoscopically verified bleeding gastroduodenal ulcer, which included 173 cases taking antithrombotic medications throughout peri-bleeding period and 173 age- and sex-matched controls not taking antithrombotic medications. RESULTS: The cases showed less frequent Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infections (45.1% versus 60.7%, p = .005), more frequent duodenal location (31.8% versus 19.1%, p = .009), and more frequent rebleeding (13.9% versus 5.8%, p = .02) than the controls. Multivariate analysis revealed that duodenal location (odds ratio [OR] 3.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.37-6.65) and use of antithrombotic medications (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.13-5.77) were independent factors for rebleeding. However, there were no differences in clinical outcomes, including final successful endoscopic hemostasis, need for surgical intervention, and mortality between cases and controls. Thromboembolic events did not occur in any cases and controls during the periendoscopic period. CONCLUSIONS: Low prevalence of H. pylori infection, frequent duodenal location, and high rebleeding rate are characteristics of patients with bleeding gastroduodenal ulcer under antithrombotic medications. Continuation of antithrombotic medications can be accepted for bleeding gastroduodenal ulcer.

Peptic Ulcer Bleeding Risk. The Role of Helicobacter Pylori Infection in NSAID/Low-Dose Aspirin Users.

OBJECTIVES: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection and NSAID/low-dose aspirin (ASA) use are associated with peptic ulcer disease. The risk of peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB) associated with the interaction of these factors remains unclear. The objective of this study was to determine the risk of PUB associated with the interaction between H. pylori infection and current nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or low-dose ASA use. METHODS: This was a case-control study of consecutive patients hospitalized because of PUB. Controls were matched by age, sex, and month of admission. H. pylori infection status was determined in all cases and controls by serology. Drug use was determined by structured questionnaire. Adjusted relative risk (RR) associated with different factors, and the interaction between NSAID/ASA and H. pylori infection was estimated by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The study included 666 cases of PUB and 666 controls; 74.3% cases and 54.8% controls (RR: 2.6; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.0-3.3) tested positive for H. pylori infection; 34.5% of cases had current NSAID use compared with 13.4% of controls (RR: 4.0; 95% CI: 3.0-5.4). Respective proportions for low-dose ASA use were 15.8 and 12%, respectively (RR: 1.9; 95% CI: 1.3-2.7). The RR of PUB for concomitant NSAID use and H. pylori infection suggested an additive effect (RR: 8.0; 95% CI: 5.0-12.8), whereas no interaction was observed with ASA use (RR: 3.5; 95% CI: 2.0-6.1). CONCLUSIONS: NSAID, low-dose ASA use, and H. pylori infection are three independent risk factors for the development of PUB, but there were differences in the interaction effect between low-dose ASA (no interaction) or NSAID (addition) use and H. pylori infection, which may have implications for clinical practice in prevention strategies.

Increasing biopsy number and sampling from gastric body improve the sensitivity of rapid urease test in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies demonstrated that the sensitivity of rapid urease test (RUT) for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection decreased during peptic ulcer bleeding. AIM: We designed this study and tried to find a better method to improve the detection rate of H. pylori infection at the same session of endoscopic diagnosis of peptic ulcer bleeding. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 116 patients with peptic ulcer bleeding. These patients received intravenous proton pump inhibitor and then received upper gastrointestinal endoscopy within 24 h after arrival. We took one piece of biopsy from gastric antrum (Group 1), four pieces from gastric antrum (Group 2), and one piece from the gastric body (Group 3) for three separate RUTs, respectively. (13)C-urease breath test was used as gold standard for diagnosis of H. pylori infection. RESULTS: There were 74 patients (64 %) with positive (13)C-urease breath test. Among these 74 patients, 45 patients had positive RUT (sensitivity: 61 %) in Group 1; 55 patients had positive RUT (sensitivity: 74 %) in Group 2; 54 patients had positive RUT (sensitivity: 73 %) in Group 3. There were significant differences between Group 1 and Group 2 (p = 0.02) and between Group 1 and Group 3 (p = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of RUT was 61 % during peptic ulcer bleeding. The sensitivity of RUT can be increased significantly by increased biopsy number from gastric antrum or biopsy from gastric body.

Low adherence to Helicobacter pylori testing in hospitalized patients with bleeding peptic ulcer disease.

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) testing in patients with bleeding ulcers is recommended by society guidelines and considered a quality indicator. The aim of the study is to examine the proportion of patients with bleeding ulcers who had H. pylori testing and identify predictors associated with H. pylori testing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive hospitalized patients with bleeding ulcers documented endoscopically at a single center from 10/2004-5/2011 were identified retrospectively from an endoscopy database. The proportion of patients undergoing direct H. pylori testing (histology, rapid urease test, breath test or stool antigen) and any H. pylori testing (direct or serologic) were determined. RESULTS: Among 330 patients with bleeding ulcers, 105 (32%, 95% CI 27-37%) underwent direct testing and another 52 (16%, 95% CI 12-20%) had serologic testing during a median follow-up of 9 months (range, 0-86). H. pylori testing occurred at the index hospitalization in 146 (93%) of the 157 patients tested. Among the 105 patients who had direct H. pylori testing, 90 (86%) had biopsy-based testing during the initial endoscopy. On multivariate analysis, undergoing biopsy of a gastric ulcer was strongly associated with having direct H. pylori testing performed (OR = 5.1, 95% CI 2.3-11.5; p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients hospitalized with bleeding ulcers, less than half received H. pylori testing and less than a third received the more accurate direct testing. Most of the direct H. pylori testing was biopsy-based with very few being tested after the index hospitalization. Efforts to increase H. pylori testing in patients with bleeding ulcers are needed to improve outcomes.

[Remote results of conservative and operative treatment of patients with duodenal ulcer complicated by bleeding].

Analyzed long-term outcomes of 690 patients with duodenal ulcer, complicated by bleeding in Kyiv City Centre gastrointestinal bleeding for the periods 1994-1996 (control group) and 2004-2008 (main group). In the late period of patients who were found giperhlorgidry (moderate and severe), increased by 1.4 tImes, indicating a higher voltage continuous acid production In the main group. With the introduction of modern circuits Helicobacter therapy incidence of H. pylori reduced by half. Improving modern tactical approaches to conservative treatment helped to reduce the frequency of relapses in duodenal ulcer remote period by 2.2 times, acute bleeding--in 1.9 times, increase the frequency of excellent results--in 2.8 times.

Long-term follow-up of 1,000 patients cured of Helicobacter pylori infection following an episode of peptic ulcer bleeding.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication on ulcer bleeding recurrence in a prospective, long-term study including 1,000 patients. METHODS: Patients with peptic ulcer bleeding were prospectively included. Prior non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use was not considered exclusion criteria. H. pylori infection was confirmed by rapid urease test, histology, or (13)C-urea breath test. Several eradication therapies were used. Subsequently, ranitidine 150 mg o.d. was administered until eradication was confirmed by (13)C-urea breath test 8 weeks after completing therapy. Patients with therapy failure received a second, third, or fourth course of eradication therapy. Patients with eradication success did not receive maintenance anti-ulcer therapy and were controlled yearly with a repeat breath test. NSAID use was not permitted during follow-up. RESULTS: Thousand patients were followed up for at least 12 months, with a total of 3,253 patient-years of follow-up. Mean age 56 years, 75% males, 41% previous NSAID users. In all, 69% had duodenal ulcer, 27% gastric ulcer, and 4% pyloric ulcer. Recurrence of bleeding was demonstrated in three patients at 1 year (which occurred after NSAID use in two cases, and after H. pylori reinfection in another one), and in two more patients at 2 years (one after NSAID use and another after H. pylori reinfection). The cumulative incidence of rebleeding was 0.5% (95% confidence interval, 0.16-1.16%), and the incidence rate of rebleeding was 0.15% (0.05-0.36%) per patient-year of follow up. CONCLUSION: Peptic ulcer rebleeding virtually does not occur in patients with complicated ulcers after H. pylori eradication. Maintenance anti-ulcer (antisecretory) therapy is not necessary if eradication is achieved. However, NSAID intake or H. pylori reinfection may exceptionally cause rebleeding in H. pylori-eradicated patients.

Accuracy of diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To assess the validity of biopsy-based tests (histology, culture, and urease test) and serology in detecting current H. pylori infection for the peptic ulcer patients who had gastric bleeding. METHODS: A total of 398 peptic ulcer patients were enrolled and divided into two groups, according to the presence or absence of bleeding. The diagnosis for current H. pylori infection was verified using the gold standard combining individual H. pylori tests. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the culture, Campylobacter-like organism (CLO) test (urease test), histology, and serology were compared. RESULTS: Of the total study population (N = 398), 157 (39.4%) patients were categorized into the bleeding group. The sensitivities of the culture (40.0%) and CLO (85.0%) in the bleeding group were significantly lower than culture (58.1%) and CLO (96.4%) in the nonbleeding group (p = .012 and p < .001, respectively). In the bleeding group, the sensitivity of CLO (85.0%) was significantly lower than histology (92.5%) and serology (97.4%) (p = .013 and p = .002, respectively), which was not found in the nonbleeding group. The specificity of serology in the bleeding group (56.3%) was significantly lower than that of nonbleeding group (74.2%) (p = .038). Similarly, the specificity of serology was significantly lower than the other H. pylori tests in the bleeders. CONCLUSIONS: Bleeding decreased the sensitivity of H. pylori tests in patients with peptic ulcer, especially in urease test or culture. In contrast, histology was found to be a quite reliable test, regardless of the presence of bleeding.

Anti-platelet therapy and managing ulcer risk.

Low-dose aspirin (ASA) has emerged as one of the most important causes of peptic ulcer bleeding in developed countries. Among the risk factors of ASA-associated ulcer bleeding, Helicobacter pylori infection is one of the few that is treatable. Recent evidence showed that among patients with a history of ASA-associated ulcer bleeding, the long-term incidence of recurrent bleeding with ASA use is low after eradication of H. pylori alone. Thus, test-and-treat H. pylori is a potentially useful strategy for ASA users with high ulcer risk. However, the risk of bleeding is further increased by combining other anti-platelet drugs (e.g. clopidogrel) with ASA in acute coronary syndromes and coronary stent placement. There is good evidence that co-therapy with a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) reduces upper gastrointestinal bleeding with ASA alone or dual anti-platelet therapy. Recently, several meta-analyses of observational studies found that concurrent use of PPI and clopidogrel was associated with increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events. Overall, the evidence does not suggest a clinically important interaction between PPIs and clopidogrel. However, there is a subset of patients who have reduced conversion of clopidogrel to its active metabolites due to genetic polymorphism of hepatic P-450 (carriers of CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles). Since PPIs are also metabolized by similar hepatic enzymes, it is uncertain whether patients carrying CY2C19 loss-of-function alleles are susceptible to concomitant PPI use. In the future, management of patients on dual anti-platelet therapy needs to be individualized according to their thrombotic and bleeding risks.

Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori positivity in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: The adverse effect of haemorrhagic complications after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on outcome is well established with Helicobacter pylori infection known to be an important precipitant of peptic ulcer disease in patients receiving non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy. The prevalence of H. pylori positivity in patients undergoing PCI and receiving subsequent antiplatelet therapy is unknown. AIMS: We sought to determine the prevalence and features associated with H. pylori positivity in patients undergoing PCI. METHODS: All patients undergoing PCI between August 2008 and April 2009 were identified and assessed for H. pylori positivity with serological status determined by using a commercially supplied enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: A total of 245 patients undergoing PCI during the study period had samples obtained for H. pylori serology. Of these, 91 were positive for H. pylori serology (37%) and 148 were negative (60%) with six samples being equivocal (3%). Of those patients positive for H. pylori, 75% were on agents at admission known to promote or precipitate gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Patients positive for H. pylori tended to be older, with increased creatinine and more likely to be receiving proton pump inhibitor therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In an unselected cohort of patients undergoing PCI in a single centre, we detected a prevalence of H. pylori positivity in 37% of patients; this denotes a potentially treatable precipitant of haemorrhage in a considerable portion of patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI. Further prospective study is required to determine if the presence of H. pylori positivity is associated with adverse events in terms of gastrointestinal and cardiac outcomes.

Characteristics of serious complicated gastroduodenal ulcers in Japan.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Even in Japan where the incidence of H. pylori infection is high, patients with gastroduodenal ulcers caused by NSAIDs are on the increase. A prospective study was conducted to elucidate the characteristics of gastroduodenal ulcers complicated with ulcerous hemorrhage and perforation among Japanese. METHODOLOGY: The subjects were 305 consecutive cases with hemorrhaging ulcers and 76 consecutive cases with perforated ulcers basis at Kagawa Prefectural Central Hospital between January 2000 and December 2008. These subjects were divided into 3 groups (lowdose aspirin, non-aspirin NSAIDs and non-NSAIDs) and were further stratified by the presence of an H. pylori infection. RESULTS: The 76 perforating ulcers were composed of 54 non-NSAIDs ulcers and 22 NSAIDs-related ulcers. The 305 hemorrhaging ulcers were composed of 156 non-NSAIDs ulcers, 94 non-aspirin NSAIDs ulcers and 55 on low-dose aspirin. The mortality for the non-aspirin NSAIDs group (12.8%, 12/94) and for the low-dose aspirin group (10.9%, 6/55) was significantly higher (p<0.01 and p<0.05, respectively) than the corresponding figure (2.6%, 4/156) for the non-NSAIDs group. The causes of death were exacerbation of or complications from the background diseases (Charlson Co-morbidity Index 3≤) (Odds ratios (OR) 6.01, 95% CI (1.98-18.89)). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 50% of the gastroduodenal ulcers with complications found in Japanese are NSAIDs-related and may take a fatal turn. It is necessary to take measures to prevent the complicated ulcers corresponding to risk factors such as the severity of background diseases.

The efficacy of PPI after endoscopic hemostasis in patients with bleeding peptic ulcer and role of Helicobacter pylori.

BACKGROUND: Nowadays PPI present cornerstone in the medical therapy of bleeding peptic ulcer. Controlled pantoprazole data in peptic ulcer bleeding are few. AIM: To compare the effect of intravenous (iv) pantoprazole (PPI) with iv ranitidine (H2RA) for bleeding peptic ulcers after endoscopic therapy. METHODS: After endoscopic haemostasis, 122 patients were randomized to PPI 80 mg + 8 mg/h or H2RA 50 mg + 13 mg/h, both for 72 h and to continue with oral equivalent dose of these medicaments. Patients underwent second-look endoscopy on day 3 or earlier, if clinically indicated. The primary endpoint measure was rebleeding before discharge and <14 days of enrollment. Secondary endpoint measures included number of surgeries performed, volume of blood transfusion, mortality rate and hospital stay. All data were statistically analyzed and a value of 0.05 or less was considered to indicate statistical significance. RESULTS: In the group who were treated with PPI, re-bleeding rate was evidenced in 5 patients (8.33%) and in the groups who were treated with H2RA, re-bleeding rate was found in 9 patients (14.5%) with RR 0.27 and CI 0.12-0.60 and P < 0.05. The volume of transfused blood was lower in the group treated with PPI compared to the group treated with H2RA (930 ml vs. 1540 ml and P < 0.05). In this study there was not statistically significant difference in the hospital stay 15.00 vs. 17.80% (9 vs. 11 patients and P> 0.05), the need for surgical intervention 5.00 vs. 6.45% (3 vs. 4 patients and P= 1.00) and the mortality rate 1.66 vs. 3.22% (1 vs. 2 patients and P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: A high-dose pantoprazole infusion is more effective than a ranitidine infusion for prevention of re-bleeding after endoscopic epinephrine injection in patients with peptic ulcers and active bleeding or non-bleeding visible vessels (P < 0.05). In all bleeding peptic ulcer patients is needed to make the eradication of H. pylori infection with the aim to prevent re-bleeding in long term.

[Dynamics of the main immunological indices in patients, suffering gastroduodenal ulcers, complicated by hemorrhage].

A deep clinical, immunological, microbiological analysis was performed in patients, suffering gastroduodenal ulcer, complicated by hemorrhage. Immunodeficiency state with the signs of autoimmunization was noted in the patients. These changes were most severe in a severe blood loss, the local endoscopic hemostasis instability, high risk of the hemorrhage recurrence occurrence, presence in a periulcer zone mucosa of a conditionally pathogenic and pathogenic microflora with a Klebsiella pneumoniae and Streptococcus beta-haemoliticus predominance. The analysis of the data obtained permits to prognosticate the pathologic process severity course and to improve the program of treatment.

[Application of antihelicobacter therapy in patients, suffering pyloroduodenal zone ulcers, complicated by hemorrhage].

There were examined 113 patients, suffering pyloroduodenal zone ulcers, complicated by an acute hemorrhage. H. pylori was revealed in 108 (96%) patients. To escape a false-negative results a serological method was applied, which was used to determine a content of IgG antibodies to H. pylori with the help of diagnostic panel GastroPanel (Biohit PLc firm, Finland). The H. pylori presence in patients must be considered as a risk factor for the early recurrent hemorrhage occurrence. A timely conducted examination, determination of H. pylori and timely prescription of antihelicobacter therapy promote the improvement of the treatment results in patients, suffering gastroduodenal ulcers, complicated by an acute hemorrhage due to reduction of the occurrence rate of early recurrence of hemorrhage.

Has H. pylori prevalence in bleeding peptic ulcer been underestimated? A meta-regression.

OBJECTIVES: It has been suggested that prevalence of Helicobacter pylori (Hp) in peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB) is lower than that in non-complicated ulcers. As Hp infection is elusive in PUB, we hypothesized that this low prevalence could be related to an insufficiently intensive search for the bacteria. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether the prevalence of Hp in PUB depends on the diagnostic methods used in a given study. METHODS: A systematic review was performed of studies assessing the prevalence of Hp infection in patients with PUB. Data were extracted in duplicate. Univariate and multivariate random-effects meta-regression analyses were performed to determine the factors that explained the differences in Hp prevalence between studies. RESULTS: The review retrieved 71 articles, including 8,496 patients. The mean prevalence of Hp infection in PUB was 72%. The meta-regression analysis showed that the most significant variables associated with a high prevalence of Hp infection were the use of a diagnostic test delayed until at least 4 weeks after the PUB episode-odds ratio: 2.08, 95% confidence interval: 1.10-3.93, P=0.024-and a lower mean age of patients-odds ratio: 0.95 per additional year, 95% confidence interval: 0.92-0.99, P=0.008. CONCLUSIONS: Studies that performed a delayed test and those including younger patients found a higher prevalence of Hp, approaching that recorded in cases of non-bleeding ulcers. These results suggest that the low prevalence of Hp infection described in PUB may be related to the methodology of the studies and to patients' characteristics, and that the true prevalence of Hp in PUB is still to be determined. Our data also support the recent recommendations of the International Consensus on Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding regarding the performance of a delayed diagnostic test when Hp tests carried out during the acute PUB episode are negative.

Risk factors for peptic ulcer bleeding in terms of Helicobacter pylori, NSAIDs, and antiplatelet agents.

OBJECTIVES: The role of the Helicobacter pylori, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and antiplatelet agents in the risk of peptic ulcer bleeding has not yet been established. This study was performed to identify the risk factors for peptic ulcer bleeding compared with non-bleeding peptic ulcer disease (PUD). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 475 patients, 265 with bleeding PUD and 210 with non-bleeding PUD were consecutively recruited. H. pylori status was determined by histology, rapid urease test, and culture. Exposure to NSAIDs, aspirin, and antiplatelet agents (clopidogrel and ticlopidine) within 4 weeks was obtained. RESULTS: Compared with non-bleeding PUD, bleeding PUD had a higher proportion of male gender and current smoking, alcohol drinking, history of aspirin/antiplatelet use, and history of PUD. Whereas the proportion of H. pylori infection and history of H. pylori eradication in bleeding PUD were significantly lower than that in non-bleeding PUD. In multivariate analysis, male gender (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.10-2.89), drinking alcohol (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.29-3.14), aspirin/antiplatelet use (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.45-3.82), and history of PUD (OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.36-4.46) remained independent risk factors for bleeding PUD. When H. pylori status and aspirin/antiplatelet agent use were combined, highest risk of bleeding peptic ulcers was found among H. pylori-negative patients with a history of aspirin/antiplatelet agent use (OR 3.03 95% CI 1.48-6.18) compared with H. pylori-positive patients with no history of aspirin/antiplatelet agent use. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with H. pylori-negative peptic ulcers who continuously took aspirin or antiplatelet agents had the highest peptic ulcer bleeding risk.

Helicobacter pylori related and non-related lesions in the stomach.

Gastric lesions may arise in gastric mucosa of patients with gastritis or gastropathies due to different etiopathogenic factors. As most lesions of the stomach result from a chronic infection of gastric mucosa with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), a possible classification of gastric lesions based on etiology may distinguish H. pylori-related lesions from those arising in a gastric mucosa not colonized from the bacterium. The repertoire of lesions one may find in the stomach is limited and different pathologies may present with a similar macroscopic aspect. Clinically relevant lesions of the stomach that are or are not associated with H. pylori infection include gastric ulcer, gastric atrophy, gastric neoplasia, and metastasis from other cancers. The detection or exclusion of an H. pylori infection in patients with gastric lesions has important consequences for the clinical management. In the present review we focus on H. pylori-related and non-related peptic lesions in the stomach.

Non-invasive testing for Helicobacter pylori in patients hospitalized with peptic ulcer hemorrhage: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

PURPOSE: Guidelines recommend routine invasive screening for Helicobacter pylori in patients with peptic ulcer hemorrhage (PUH). However, compliance with screening remains suboptimal. The aim of this study was to determine if a simplified approach based on noninvasive screening is cost effective in PUH. RESULTS: In the base case, post-endoscopy urea breath test (UBT) dominated the invasive testing with 34 fewer hemorrhages and cost savings of $406,600 in a cohort of 10,000 patients. When compliance with invasive testing decreases to 60%, post-endoscopy UBT leads to 109 fewer hemorrhages and cost savings of $1,089,600. The invasive strategy becomes the preferred choice if the sensitivity of UBT reduces to <75%, such as in patients taking proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) before hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Post-endoscopy UBT is cost effective in PPI-naïve patients presenting with PUH. This strategy, once prospectively validated, can prove to be a preferred approach in institutions where compliance with invasive testing is suboptimal.

[Risk factors for peptic ulcer bleeding]. / Risikofaktorer for blødende magesår.

BACKGROUND: Many drugs increase the risk for gastroduodenal ulcer bleeding. The aim of this study was to investigate Helicobacter pylori infection and drug use in patients who had gastroduodenal ulcer bleeding in 2002 or 2007, and possible differences between the periods. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with gastroduodenal ulcer bleeding were prospectively included in the periods 1.1 - 31.12. 2002 and 1.1 - 31.12. 2007. Information was recorded about Helicobacter pylori infection and intake of NSAIDs (non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), acetylsalicylic acid, warfarin, clopidogrel, low-molecular heparine, SSRIs (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors), corticosteroids, paracetamol and proton pump inhibitors. Inhabitants in Oslo age >or= 60 years in 2007, were used as a control for drug use. RESULTS: 78.2 % of patients in 2002 and 90.7 % of those in 2007 used at least one of the drugs (p = 0.01). In 2002, 25.7 % of patients used non-selective NSAIDs and in 2007 46.1 % used such drugs (p = 0.001). In 2002, 36.7 % of patients used more than one of the studied drugs, versus 50.9 % in 2007 (p = 0.02). Compared to controls, the patients used more NSAIDs, acetylsalicylic acid, clopidogrel, low- molecular heparine, SSRIs and corticosteroids. Helicobacter pylori infection was diagnosed in 51.0 % of patients in 2002, versus 41.1 % in 2007 (p = 0.11). INTERPRETATION: Most patients with gastroduodenal ulcer bleeding use drugs that have a known risk of adverse effects such as ulcer and/or gastrointestinal bleeding.

Endoscopic diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection by rapid urease test in bleeding peptic ulcers: a prospective case-control study.

GOAL: To assess the efficacy of rapid urease test (RUT) in patients with bleeding ulcers, as well as the effects of visible blood in the stomach and short-term (<24 h) use of standard-dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) on RUT sensitivity. BACKGROUND: The sensitivity of RUT in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori in upper gastrointestinal bleeding has been reported with conflicting results. STUDY: This was a prospective case-control study evaluating 324 consecutive patients with bleeding peptic ulcers (study group) and 164 with uncomplicated ulcers (control group). The presence of H. pylori infection was determined by both RUT and histology. Prevalence of H. pylori infection and the RUT sensitivity in diagnosing the bacteria between study and control groups were conducted. RESULTS: The prevalence of H. pylori infection in those with bleeding ulcers was significantly lower than that of controls (53.7% vs. 65.2%, P=0.015). The false-negative rate of RUT in the study group was significantly greater than that of the control group (16.7% vs. 5.6%, P=0.006), whereas the sensitivity rates in the study group with or without gastric blood were significantly lower than those of the controls (79.6% vs. 94.4%, P=0.005; 84.8% vs. 94.4%, P=0.019). There was no significant difference in RUT sensitivity between study group with or without visible gastric blood (P=0.41). The RUT sensitivity rate was also not significantly different between those treated with PPI and those without in patients with bleeding ulcers (82.7% vs. 85.7%, P=0.67). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the sensitivity of RUT in patients with bleeding ulcers is reduced. The presence of blood in the stomach and the short-term use of standard-dose PPI do not affect the RUT sensitivity in bleeding ulcers.