A Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival of TNM 8th Edition Stage I Non-small-cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Models for predicting the survival outcomes of stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) defined by the newly released 8th edition TNM staging system are scarce. This study aimed to develop a nomogram for predicting the cancer-specific survival (CSS) of these patients and identifying individuals with a higher risk for CSS. METHODS: A total of 30,475 NSCLC cases were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We identified and integrated the risk factors to build a nomogram. The model was subjected to bootstrap internal validation with the SEER database, and external validation with a multicenter cohort of 1133 patients from China. The difference in the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on model-defined high- and low-risk patients was examined using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). RESULTS: Eight independent prognostic factors were identified and integrated into the model. The calibration curves showed good agreement. The concordance index (C-index) of the nomogram was higher than that of the staging system (IA1, IA2, IA3, and IB) (internal validation set 0.63 vs. 0.56; external validation set 0.66 vs. 0.55; both p < 0.01). Specifically, 21.7% of stage IB patients (7.5% of all stage I) were categorized into the high-risk group (score > 30). There was a significant interaction effect between the adjuvant chemotherapy and risk groups in the NCDB cohort (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: We established a practical nomogram to predict CSS for 8th edition stage I NSCLC. A prospective study is warranted to determine its role in identifying adjuvant chemotherapy candidates.

Lung cancer in Spanish women: The WORLD07 project.

The WORLD07 study was a female-specific database, to prospectively characterise the clinical, histological, molecular and treatment-related features in Spanish women with lung cancer. Data were collected from patients' medical records and patient interviews from October 2007 to December 2012. A total of 2,060 women were analysed: median age, 61.3 years; white, 98.6%; postmenopausal, 80.2%; and no smokers, 55% including never smokers and ex-smokers. A family history of cancer was found in 42.5% of patients, 12.0% of patients had had a previous history of cancer (breast cancer, 39.7%). Most patients (85.8%) were diagnosed of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), most commonly reported with adenocarcinoma (71.4%), which was stage IV at diagnosis in 57.6%. Median overall survival (OS) for the entire population was 24.0 months, with a 1- and 2-year survival rate of 70.7% and 50.0% respectively. Median OS in patients with small-cell lung cancer was 18.8 months versus 25.0 months in patients with NSCLC (p = 0.011). Lung cancer appears to be a biologically different disease in women. By collecting prospective information about characteristics of women with lung cancer attending university hospitals in Spain, we hope to highlight the need to develop strategies based on gender differences and influence future healthcare policy.

Lung transplantation for non-small cell lung cancer and multifocal bronchioalveolar cell carcinoma.

Lung transplantation for primary bronchogenic cancer could lead to increased survival and improved quality of life for patients who have malignant disease, for which other therapies might be inappropriate. This Review examines the development of experience and outcomes for this indication and explores the limitations that are inherent in lung transplantation for malignant disease. Bronchogenic malignancy is a rare indication for lung transplantation constituting only 0·13% of all lung transplants in the USA from 1987 to 2010 and is only indicated for early-stage disease when conventional surgical techniques are contraindicated by poor lung function in which an unacceptably high risk of short-term mortality is expected. Outcomes can be extrapolated from the experience of finding an unexpected malignancy in an explanted lung for which approximately 30% of recipients, dependent on stage, succumb from distant metastatic disease in the first few years after transplant, after which long-term survival is similar to transplantation for other conditions. Care must be taken for lung transplantation for multifocal bronchoalveolar cell carcinoma to ensure that the donor lung is not contaminated with residual bronchoalveolar cell carcinoma cells in the upper airways during surgical implantation. The rarity of lung transplantation for cancer, and the absence of head-to-head trials comparing lung transplantation with conventional cancer care, limit the conclusions that can be drawn about lung transplantation for this indication. Furthermore, the ethical balance of how to allocate a scarce resource, such as a donor lung, remains an unresolved dilemma given the uncertainties regarding long-term survival. Conversely, individual patients might have substantial increases in survival and quality of life equivalent or superior to conventional cancer treatment methods.

Survival and treatment of non-small cell lung cancer stage I-II treated surgically or with stereotactic body radiotherapy: patient and tumor-specific factors affect the prognosis.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to define clinical baseline parameters associated with impaired survival of patients with stage I or II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent surgery or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). METHODS: From January 2001 to January 2011, 425 patients (216 surgery, 209 SBRT) were identified with clinical stage I or II NSCLC. Cox proportional-hazards regression analyses were used to investigate risk factors for mortality. RESULTS: Median age of patients in the surgery and SBRT groups was 65 and 74 years, respectively. A smaller proportion of the surgical group had Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score ≥1 compared with the SBRT group: 52 and 72 % (p < 0.001), respectively. Overall survival in the surgical group at 2 and 4 years was 79 and 65 %, respectively. In the SBRT group, this was 65 % at 2 years and 44 % at 4 years. In the surgical group older age, CCI score = 4 and clinical stage = IIB were associated with long-term mortality. In the SBRT group, this was CCI score ≥5 and clinical stage >IA. The area under the curve was calculated for the model with clinical and tumor factors: 0.77 for the surgery and 0.85 for the SBRT group. CONCLUSIONS: Both patient characteristics and survival of NSCLC I-II patients undergoing surgical treatment or SBRT differ considerably. Long-term survival as a result of treatment strategy of NSCLC patients might be optimized by focusing on patient and tumor specific factors. In addition to TNM staging, the consideration of patient age and CCI can be useful for prognostication of NSCLC patients.

The effects of sonic hedgehog signaling pathway components on non-small-cell lung cancer progression and clinical outcome.

BACKGROUND: Researchers in recent studies have reported that the sonic hedgehog (Shh) signaling pathway plays a crucial role during tumorigenesis, angiogenesis and cellular differentiation. We investigated the clinical and pathological significances of the Shh pathway and of its lymphangiogenic components in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), namely, Shh, glioma-associated oncogene homolog zinc finger protein 1 (Gli1), lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor 1 (LYVE-1) and vascular endothelial growth factor D (VEGF-D). METHODS: The expression of Shh, Gli1, LYVE-1 and VEGF-D in primary NSCLC tissue from 40 patients was examined using immunohistochemical assays, and relationships between expression and clinicopathological data, such as age, gender, histology, tumor size, nodal stage, visceral pleural invasion, lymphatic thromboembolism, recurrence and overall survival were investigated. RESULTS: Of the 40 specimens examined, 25 (62.5%), 20 (50.0%), 11 (27.5%) and 20 (50.0%) were positive for Shh, Gli1, LYVE-1 or VEGF-D expression, respectively. The expression of Gli1 and LYVE-1 were significantly associated (P = 0.011), and Shh and LYVE-1 expression was related to visceral pleural invasion and lymphatic thromboembolism, respectively (P < 0.05). Shh expression levels compared on survival curves were statistically significant in univariate logrank analysis (P = 0.020). However, other clinicopathological factors did not reveal any statistical significance in univariate and multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this the first report of the relationship between components of the Shh signaling pathway and prognosis in NSCLC. The expression of Shh, Gli1 and LYVE-1 was found to be associated with clinicopathological factors and survival. Thus, the overexpression of the Shh signaling pathway could serve as a predictor of malignant behavior, including lymphangiogenesis, in NSCLC.

TNFRSF10B polymorphisms and haplotypes associated with increased risk of death in non-small cell lung cancer.

Presently, there are few validated biomarkers that can predict survival or treatment response for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and most are based on tumor markers. Biomarkers based on germ line DNA variations represent a valuable complementary strategy, which could have translational implications by subclassifying patients to tailored, patient-specific treatment. We analyzed single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 53 inflammation-related genes among 651 NSCLC patients. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models, adjusted for lung cancer prognostic factors, were used to assess the association of genotypes and haplotypes with overall survival. Four of the top 15 SNPs associated with survival were located in the TNF-receptor superfamily member 10b (TNFRSF10B) gene. The T-allele of the top ranked SNP (rs11785599) was associated with a 41% increased risk of death (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.16-1.70) and the other three TNFRSF10B SNPs (rs1047275, rs4460370 and rs883429) exhibited a 35% (95% CI = 1.11-1.65), 29% (95% CI = 1.06-1.57) and 24% (95% CI = 0.99-1.54) increased risk of death, respectively. Haplotype analyses revealed that the most common risk haplotype (TCTT) was associated with a 78% (95% CI = 1.25-2.54) increased risk of death compared with the low-risk haplotype (CGCC). When the data were stratified by treatment, the risk haplotypes exhibited statistically significantly increased risk of death among patients who had surgery only and no statistically significant effects among patients who had surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. These data suggest that possessing one or more risk alleles in TNFRSF10B is associated with an increased risk of death. Validated germ line biomarkers may have potential important clinical implications by optimizing patient-specific treatment.

Well-differentiated adenocarcinoma-bronchioloalveolar carcinoma-in situ adenocarcinoma: a conundrum.

Over the last decade, considerable changes have been made to the classification of pulmonary adenocarcinoma, mainly with respect to the classification of small solitary tumors. The main goal seems to have been the identification of tumors that not only follow an indolent clinical course but that can also be treated more conservatively. Thus, the most important change to the classification of lung adenocarcinoma was proposed for a tumor no greater than 3.0 cm in size with a pure lepidic growth pattern and lacking stromal, vascular, or pleural invasion, which should now be categorized as in situ adenocarcinoma. At the same time, a category of minimally invasive adenocarcinoma was proposed for tumors with a predominantly lepidic growth pattern, <3 cm in size, and with <5 mm invasion in greatest dimension in any 1 focus. What is interesting about all these developments is the fact that all the publications on this issue have been presented under the terms of small adenocarcinomas or bronchioloalveolar carcinoma. Unfortunately, the literature reviews that have proposed the change in nomenclature to in situ adenocarcinoma have not offered a more in-depth assessment of these neoplasms. More recently, a publication of a large series of cases of small adenocarcinomas has offered a different view and underscored some of the important issues that need to be taken into account before a serious change in the nomenclature can be considered.

Ciliated adenocarcinomas of the lung: a tumor of non-terminal respiratory unit origin.

Whereas most carcinomas occur through a sequential step, atypical adenomatous hyperplasia and bronchioloalveolar carcinoma pathway is known for pulmonary adenocarcinoma. This type is known as terminal respiratory unit adenocarcinoma. Based on our observation of transitions from normal ciliated columnar cells to adenocarcinoma via dysplastic mucous columnar cells, we reviewed our archive of pulmonary adenocarcinoma. Terminal respiratory unit type adenocarcinoma was defined as adenocarcinoma with type II pneumocyte, Clara cell, or bronchiolar cell morphology according to previous reports. Among 157 cases, 121 cases have been identified as terminal respiratory unit type adenocarcinoma and 36 cases as non-terminal respiratory unit type adenocarcinoma. Among non-terminal respiratory unit type adenocarcinoma, 24 cases revealed mucous columnar cell changes that were continuous with bronchial ciliated columnar cells. The mucous columnar cells became dysplastic showing loss of cilia, disorientation, and enlarged nuclei. Adenocarcinoma arose from these dysplastic mucous columnar cells and, characteristically, this type of adenocarcinoma showed acute inflammation, and honeycombing changes in the background. TTF1 immunostaining was consistently negative. In a case study with 14 males and 10 females, including 12 smokers or ex-smokers, EGFR and KRAS mutations were detected in 3 and 6 patients, respectively. We think that this kind of adenocarcinoma arising through mucous columnar cell change belongs to non-terminal respiratory unit type adenocarcinoma, and mucous columnar cell change is a precursor lesion of pulmonary adenocarcinoma.

The long-term impact of surgical complications after resection of stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer: a population-based survival analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Surgical morbidity may influence long-term cancer survival. Because resection of early stage nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is primary therapy, we sought to determine the survival impact of surgical complications for elderly patients undergoing resection of stage I NSCLC. METHODS: Using the linked Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare database (2000-2005), we identified elderly patients who underwent lobectomy for stage I NSCLC. We then assessed the unadjusted association between in-hospital, postoperative complications, and long-term survival for patients who survived more than 30 days after resection using the Kaplan-Meier method. Finally, we used Cox proportional hazards regression to evaluate the relationship between postoperative complications and 5-year cancer-specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS) after adjusting for patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics. RESULTS: We identified 3996 eligible patients. The overall in-hospital, postoperative complication rate was 54.2%. Pulmonary complications were the most common (n = 1464) followed by cardiac (n = 916). Unadjusted 5-year CSS was significantly worse for those who had an in-hospital, postoperative complication (70.9%) compared to those who did not (78.9%, P < 0.001). OS was also significantly worse (P < 0.001) for patients who developed a complication. Complications continued to predict worse 5-year CSS and OS after adjusting for patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics (HR: 1.38, 95% CI, 1.17-1.64). CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of in-hospital postoperative complications was an independent predictor of worse 5-year CSS after resection of stage I NSCLC. Importantly, the impact of surgical complications extends well after the initial perioperative period. These findings may help identify important targets for best practice guidelines and quality-of-care measures.

Sorafenib in combination with erlotinib or with gemcitabine in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Sorafenib is a small-molecule multitargeted kinase inhibitor that blocks the activation of C-RAF, B-RAF, c-KIT, FLT-3, RET, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2), VEGFR-3 and platelet-derived growth factor receptor ß. The aim of this multicenter, randomized phase II study was to evaluate clinical activity and safety of sorafenib in combination with erlotinib or gemcitabine in unselected untreated elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: The trial was designed to select the most promising sorafenib-containing combination in previously untreated elderly (≥70 years) stage IIIB or IV NSCLC patients, with performance status of zero to two. Patients were randomly assigned to one of the following combinations: gemcitabine, 1200 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8, every 21 days, for a maximum of six cycles, plus sorafenib, 800 mg/day, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity (arm 1); or erlotinib, 150 mg/day, plus sorafenib, 800 mg/day, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity (arm 2). A selection design was applied with 1-year survival rate as the primary end point of the study, requiring 58 patients. RESULTS: Sixty patients were randomly allocated to the study (31 patients in arm 1 and 29 patients in arm 2). After a median follow-up of 15 months, 10 patients [32%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 16% to 49%] in arm 1 and 13 patients (45%, 95% CI 27% to 63%) in arm 2 were alive at 1 year. Median overall survival was 6.6 and 12.6 months in arm 1 and arm 2, respectively. Observed toxic effects were consistent with the expected drug profiles. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of erlotinib and sorafenib was feasible in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC and was associated with a higher 1-year survival rate than the other arm. According to the selection design, this combination warrants further investigation in phase III trials.

Quality of life, geriatric assessment and survival in elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with carboplatin-gemcitabine or carboplatin-paclitaxel: NVALT-3 a phase III study.

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may derive similar benefit from platinum-based chemotherapy as younger patients. Quality of life (QoL) and comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is often advocated to assess benefits and risks. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 181 chemotherapy-naive patients [≥70 years, performance score (PS) of 0-2] with stage III-IV NSCLC received carboplatin and gemcitabine (CG) (n = 90) or carboplatin and paclitaxel (CP) (n = 91) every 3 weeks for up to four cycles. Primary end point was change in global QoL from baseline compared with week 18. Pretreatment CGA and mini geriatric assessment during and after treatment were undertaken. A principal component (PC) analysis was carried out to determine the underlying dimensions of CGA and QoL and subsequently related to survival. RESULTS: There were no changes in QoL after treatment. The number of QoL responders (CG arm, 12%; CP arm, 5%) was not significantly different. CGA items were only associated with neuropsychiatric toxicity. Quality-adjusted survival was not different between treatment arms. The PC analysis derived from nine CGA, six QoL and one PS score indicated only one dominant dimension. This dimension was strongly prognostic, and physical and role functioning, Groningen Frailty Indicator and Geriatric Depression Scale were its largest contributors. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel or gemcitabine added to carboplatin did not have a differential effect on global QoL. CGA was associated with toxic effects in a very limited manner. CGA and QoL items measure one underlying dimension, which is highly prognostic.

Insulin-like growth factor receptor 1 (IGF1R) expression and survival in surgically resected non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to investigate the prognostic role of insulin-like growth factor receptor 1 (IGF1R) expression in surgically resected non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patient characteristics and methods: This retrospective study was conducted in 369 stage I-II-IIIA, surgically resected, NSCLC patients. Patients exposed to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) agents were excluded. IGF1R expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in tissue microarray sections. RESULTS: A positive IGF1R expression (score > or = 100) was observed in 282 cases (76.4%) and was significantly associated with squamous cell histology (P = 0.04) and with grade III differentiation (P = 0.02). No difference in survival was observed between the positive and negative group when score 100 was used as cut-off for discriminating a positive versus a negative IGF1R result (52 versus 48 months, P = 0.99) or when median value of IGF1R expression was used (45 versus 55 months, P = 0.36). No difference in survival was observed between IGF1R-positive and -negative patients in a subgroup of stage I-II adenocarcinoma (n = 137) with known EGFR mutation and copy number status. CONCLUSIONS: IGF1R expression does not represent a prognostic factor in resected NSCLC patients. Patients with squamous cell carcinoma overexpress IGF1R more frequently than patients with nonsquamous histology, justifying the different sensitivity to anti-IGF1R agents observed in clinical trials.

Gene expression profiles of non-small cell lung cancer: survival prediction and new biomarkers.

OBJECTIVES: Despite the well-defined histological types of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a given stage is often associated with wide-ranging survival rates and treatment outcomes. This disparity has led to an increased demand for the discovery and identification of new informative biomarkers. METHODS: In the current study, we screened 81 NSCLC samples using Illumina whole-genome gene expression microarrays in an effort to identify differentially expressed genes and new NSCLC biomarkers. RESULTS: We identified novel genes whose expression was upregulated in NSCLC, including SPAG5, POLH, KIF23, and RAD54L, which are associated with mitotic spindle formation, DNA repair, chromosome segregation, and dsDNA break repair, respectively. We also identified several novel genes whose expression was downregulated in NSCLC, including SGCG, NLRC4, MMRN1, and SFTPD, which are involved in extracellular matrix formation, apoptosis, blood vessel leakage, and inflammation, respectively. We found a significant correlation between RNA degradation and survival in adenocarcinoma cases. CONCLUSIONS: Even though the follow-up time was too limited to draw final conclusions, we were able to show better prediction p values in a group selection based on molecular profiles compared to histology. The current study also uncovered new candidate biomarker genes that are likely to be involved in diverse processes associated with NSCLC development.

Initial treatment strategies and outcomes for multifocal bronchioloalveolar carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC) commonly presents as multifocal disease. Management of multifocal BAC remains controversial and may include surgical resection, systemic therapy, surveillance, or a combination of these strategies. Knowledge of current practice patterns and outcomes could help to inform future research. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records of patients with BAC were retrospectively reviewed, and regression analyses were conducted to correlate demographic parameters, disease characteristics, and treatment modality with clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 109 cases identified, 85 patients were eligible for study, 26% with unifocal and 74% with multifocal BAC. Median age at diagnosis was 65 years; the majority of the patients were female (64%), were non-Asian (82%), and had a smoking history (66%). In the subset with multifocal BAC, 24% of the cases were confined to one lobe, 76% affected multiple lobes, and 40% involved both lungs. The primary treatment modality for multifocal disease included surgical resection (78%), systemic therapy (14%), and observation (8%). In multivariate analyses, extensive disease (> or = 3 lobes involved) and medical oncology assessment predicted treatment with systemic therapy (odds ratio [OR], 8.68; P = .03 and OR, 1.68; P < .01, respectively). The presence of extensive disease and the receipt of systemic therapy were associated with higher likelihood of disease progression (hazard ratio [HR], 8.62; P = .02 and HR, 8.46; P = .02, respectively). CONCLUSION: Initial treatment choices and referral patterns for multifocal BAC were diverse and influenced by clinical selection, whereby patients with extensive disease were more likely to discuss and receive systemic therapy. Surgery and surveillance were reasonable treatment options for selected patients. The precise roles of the various treatment strategies for multifocal BAC require further evaluation.

Surgical resection and long-term survival for octogenarians who undergo surgery for non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: An increasing proportion of newly diagnosed non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients are octogenarians. It has been questioned whether older patients benefit from surgical resection of lung cancer to the same extent as younger patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-institution, retrospective analysis of patients newly diagnosed with NSCLC from 2000-2006, who underwent surgical resection of their lung cancer in Hoag Hospital. We compared resection and survival rates for patients who were age 80 years or older to younger cohorts and determined their stage distribution, rates of surgery, and actuarial survival by age-defined cohort. Of 1293 total patients, 17.2% were age 80 years or older; 36.1%, age 70-79 years; 29.2%, age 60-69 years; 12.9%, age 50-59 years; and 4.6%, under age 50. Of these patients, 482 underwent surgical resection. Surgical procedures included 400 lobectomies, 23 pneumonectomies, and 59 wedge resections. RESULTS: The proportion of patients who had local disease at diagnosis was higher for octogenarians compared with younger patients (33.6% vs. 26.6%; P = .021), but the resection rate for octogenarians was lower (64% vs. 83%; P = .0003). For patients determined to have local- or regional-stage disease, resection rates were 52% versus 67.9% (P = .0007). However, survival curves for patients who underwent surgical resection were similar for all five cohorts with 5-year survival rates of 62%, 53%, 63%, 63%, and 79% from oldest to youngest. CONCLUSION: Non-small-cell lung cancer patients < 80 years of age were less likely to undergo potentially curative surgery, but survival for octogenarians who did undergo surgical resection was comparable to younger age groups. Such patients should not be denied potentially curative surgery simply because of age.

Expression of FAK and PTEN in bronchioloalveolar carcinoma and lung adenocarcinoma.

Bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC) is classified as a subset of lung adenocarcinoma but has a distinct clinical presentation, tumor biology, response to therapy, and prognosis compared with other subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma. This study was designed to investigate the clinicopathological differences between BAC and adenocarcinoma and the expression of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN) and their clinical significance in BAC and adenocarcinoma. A retrospective analysis was performed on 77 patients with BAC and 172 patients with pure adenocarcinoma seen during the period from January 1998 to December 2000. All patients underwent lobectomy or pneumonectomy and systematic lymph node dissection. Paraffin-embedded tissue blocks from these patients were obtained and expressions of PTEN and FAK were evaluated by using immunohistochemical staining. Clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcome were reviewed and compared between patients with BAC and adenocarcinoma. Lymph node status, clinical symptoms, CT appearance and expression of FAK were different between BAC and adenocarcinoma. The overall survival of BAC was better than that of adenocarcinoma. In patients with FAK(-), the overall survival was not different between BAC and adenocarcinoma. In patients with adenocarcinoma, the overall survival was better for FAK(-) compared with FAK(+). Expression of PTEN had a prognostic significance in patients with BAC and adenocarcinoma. BAC and adenocarcinoma have different clinicopathological presentations. Expression of FAK has some effect on such differences and affects survival of lung adenocarcinoma. Expression of PTEN can predict outcome of resected lung adenocarcinoma and BAC.

[Tumor size and survival in lung cancer, stage IA]. / Tamaño del tumor y supervivencia en carcinoma de pulmón, estadio 1A.

TNM staging is an important long-term predictor for survival of lung cancer patients. Some studies have shown, however, that tumor size may have intrinsic prognostic value independent of TNM stage. The relationship between tumor size and survival is particularly unclear in T1 tumors. The objective of this study was to assess the prognostic value of tumor size in surgically resected stage I of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Clinical records of 79 patients with stage IA NSCLC were reviewed. In 34.4% of patients (n = 28) size was < or = 1.5 cm. Surgical mortality was 1.3%. Disease recurrence was noted in 19%. Patients with tumors < or = 15 mm had a significantly higher 5-year survival (95% CI:0.05 vs. 77% CI: 0.07 in > 15mm group). Disease-free survival was 95% for tumors less than 15 mm vs. 72% in larger tumors. Using Cox Multivariate analysis, the most determinant factor for higher risk of mortality was size > 15 mm (relative risk 25.9, IC: 2.3-292, p = 0.004). The independent influence of tumor size in stage IA NSCLC may have practical implications with regards to proposals for screening asymptomatic individuals at high risk for lung cancer.

A prospective 5-year follow-up study after limited resection for lung cancer with ground-glass opacity.

OBJECTIVES: The incidence of small-sized pulmonary adenocarcinomas with ground-glass opacity (GGO) has recently increased, with excellent postoperative prognosis. The limited resection of such cancers has been deemed to be acceptable based on retrospective studies. We conducted a prospective multi-institutional study evaluating the validity of limited resection for small-sized pulmonary adenocarcinoma with GGO. METHODS: The inclusion criteria were 25-80 years of age, no prior treatment, a maximum tumour diameter of 8-20 mm, a GGO ratio of ≥ 80%, clinical T1N0M0, lower 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose accumulation than the mediastinum, resectable by sublobar resection, pulmonary lobectomy tolerable and an intraoperative pathological diagnosis of bronchiloalveolar carcinoma. Wedge resection was preferred, but segmentectomy was permitted. Disease-specific survival and overall survival were analysed. RESULTS: From November 2006 to April 2012, 73 patients were enrolled from 13 institutions. One patient was ineligible, and the remaining 72 patients were preregistered. The tumours of 3 and 14 patients were intraoperatively diagnosed as benign lesions and adenocarcinomas with mixed subtype, respectively. Intraoperative cytological/histological examination of surgical margin was not performed in 2 patients, and the remaining 53 patients were ultimately eligible for this study. The mean tumour size was 14.0 mm and the mean GGO ratio was 95.9%. Thirty-nine and 14 patients underwent wedge resection and segmentectomy, respectively. Although all tumours were intraoperatively diagnosed as bronchioloalveolar carcinomas, 6 were ultimately diagnosed as adenocarcinoma with a mixed subtype. No completion lobectomy was performed. As of 1 May 2017, no recurrence of the original lung cancer was observed during 60.0-126.3 months after surgery. Two patients died from other diseases. The 5-year disease-specific and overall survival rates were 100% and 98.1%, respectively. The reduction in the pulmonary function after limited resection was minimal. CONCLUSIONS: With these criteria, limited resection was performed safely without any recurrence, and the postoperative pulmonary function was well preserved. The outcomes of limited resection for small-sized lung cancer with GGOs that met the criteria of this study were satisfactory.

Paired Phase II Studies of Erlotinib/Bevacizumab for Advanced Bronchioloalveolar Carcinoma or Never Smokers With Advanced Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer: SWOG S0635 and S0636 Trials.

BACKGROUND: Before mutation testing of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene was recognized as highly associated with the activity of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), clinically defined patient populations with bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC) and never smokers were identified as likely to benefit from EGFR TKIs. From preclinical and clinical data suggesting potentially improved efficacy with a combination of an EGFR TKI and the antiangiogenic agent bevacizumab, the Southwestern Oncology Group (SWOG) initiated paired phase II trials to evaluate the combination of erlotinib/bevacizumab in patients with advanced BAC (SWOG S0635) or never smokers with advanced lung adenocarcinoma (SWOG S0636). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible patients with BAC or adenocarcinoma with BAC features (SWOG S0635) or never smokers with advanced lung adenocarcinoma (SWOG S0636) received erlotinib 150 mg/day with bevacizumab 15 mg/kg until progression or prohibitive toxicity. Never smokers with BAC were preferentially enrolled to SWOG S0636. The primary endpoint for both trials was overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 84 patients were enrolled in the SWOG S0635 trial and 85 in the SWOG S0636 trial. The objective response rate was 22% (3% complete response) in the SWOG S0635 trial and 50% (38% confirmed; 3% complete response) in the SWOG S0636 trial. The median progression-free survival was 5 and 7.4 months in the S0635 and S0636 trials, respectively. The median overall survival was 21 and 29.8 months, respectively. Toxicity consisted mainly of rash and diarrhea in both trials. CONCLUSION: Although the field has moved toward molecular, rather than clinical, selection of patients as optimal candidates for EGFR TKI therapy, these results support the hypothesis that a subset of patients in whom erlotinib is particularly active could receive an incremental benefit from the addition of bevacizumab.

Comparison in prognosis after VATS lobectomy and open lobectomy for stage I lung cancer: retrospective analysis focused on a histological subgroup.

BACKGROUND: Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has become an attractive surgical procedure, but several issues remain to be resolved. Prognosis after VATS lobectomy is important to evaluate the adequacy of VATS lobectomy as a cancer operation. Interestingly, several investigators, including us, have reported that prognosis after VATS lobectomy was superior to that after open lobectomy in early non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). One of the possible reasons is the low invasiveness of VATS lobectomy. But we considered that patient bias might have some influence favoring VATS lobectomy. To evaluate our hypothesis, we reviewed medical records of stage I NSCLC patients undergoing operation between 1993 and 2002. We compared and evaluated the relationship between patient characteristics and prognosis after VATS and open lobectomy. We focused particularly on histological type, classifying it into four subgroups; (1) bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC), (2) mixed BAC + papillary adenocarcinoma (BAC + Pap), (3) other adenocarcinoma (Other adeno), (4) squamous cell carcinoma + others (Sq + others). RESULTS: A total of 165 patients underwent VATS lobectomy, and 123 patients underwent open lobectomy. The 5-year survival rate of the VATS lobectomy group was 94.5% and that of the open lobectomy group was 81.5%. Univariate Cox regression of survival revealed that male, CEA > 5, Other adeno, Sq + others, open lobectomy, and tumor size > 3 cm were significant negative prognostic variables. Multivariate Cox regression of survival revealed that histological subtype and tumor size were independent prognostic factors, but surgical procedure was not an independent prognostic factor. COMMENTS: Prognosis after VATS lobectomy was superior to that after open lobectomy, but patient bias influenced the prognosis in favor of VATS lobectomy, and the surgical procedure itself was not a prognostic factor.