Reversal of cancer cachexia and muscle wasting by ActRIIB antagonism leads to prolonged survival.

Muscle wasting and cachexia have long been postulated to be key determinants of cancer-related death, but there has been no direct experimental evidence to substantiate this hypothesis. Here, we show that in several cancer cachexia models, pharmacological blockade of ActRIIB pathway not only prevents further muscle wasting but also completely reverses prior loss of skeletal muscle and cancer-induced cardiac atrophy. This treatment dramatically prolongs survival, even of animals in which tumor growth is not inhibited and fat loss and production of proinflammatory cytokines are not reduced. ActRIIB pathway blockade abolished the activation of the ubiquitin-proteasome system and the induction of atrophy-specific ubiquitin ligases in muscles and also markedly stimulated muscle stem cell growth. These findings establish a crucial link between activation of the ActRIIB pathway and the development of cancer cachexia. Thus ActRIIB antagonism is a promising new approach for treating cancer cachexia, whose inhibition per se prolongs survival.

IUPHAR ECR review: Cancer-related anorexia-cachexia in cancer patients: Pathophysiology and treatment.

Cancer-related anorexia-cachexia (CRAC) comprises one of the most common syndromes of advanced cancer patients. The prevalence of CRAC increases from 50% to 80% before death. CRAC is associated not only with impaired quality of life in patients and family members but also with shorter survival. The management of CRAC is a great challenge in clinical practice. There are no definite practice guidelines yet for the prevention and treatment of CRAC. A multimodal strategy is the most effective way to treat anorexia-cachexia. Numerous medications have been suggested and used in clinical trials, while others are still being studied on experimental animals. These medications include branched-chain amino acids, eicosapentaenoic acid, thalidomide, cytokine inhibitors, steroids, antiserotoninergic medications, and appetite stimulants. The benefits of supportive care interventions and the advancement of exciting new pharmacological medicines for anorexia-cachexia are becoming more widely recognized. Health care professionals need to be aware of the psychosocial and biological effects of anorexia-cachexia, even though knowledge of the underlying molecular causes of the disorder has advanced significantly.

Anamorelin for the Treatment of Cancer Anorexia-Cachexia Syndrome.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The following review will highlight the development of anamorelin to treat cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome (CACS) including the potential benefits, limitations, and future directions. RECENT FINDINGS: Ghrelin, a 28-amino acid peptide hormone, is secreted by the stomach mucosa and regulates appetite, promotes lipogenesis, increases body weight, improves gastric motility, reduces catabolic wasting and inflammation. Several randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials evaluating anamorelin, a ghrelin agonist, for the treatment of CACS have reported improvement in appetite and body composition including both lean body and fat mass; however, most studies noted no improvement in physical function as assessed by measuring non-dominant hand-grip strength. Common adverse effects of anamorelin include the development of diabetes mellitus, hyperglycemia, and less frequently, hepatic abnormalities and cardiovascular events including conduction abnormalities, hypertension, and ischemic cardiomyopathy. Anamorelin has the potential to stimulate appetite, improve gastric movement, and may have anti-inflammatory effects on patients with CACS. In patients with cancer, studies involving anamorelin combined with other multimodal treatments including nutrition counseling (branched chain amino acids, omega 3 fatty acids, and other nutrients), exercise, treatment of hormonal abnormalities including hypogonadism and hypovitaminosis D, and anti-inflammatory agents are needed. Compliance with multimodality treatment has been a barrier and future studies may need to incorporate motivational counseling to promote adherence.

Mirtazapine versus megestrol acetate in treatment of anorexia-cachexia in advanced cancer patients: a randomized, double-blind trial.

OBJECTIVE: Cancer-related anorexia-cachexia comprises one of the most common syndromes of advanced cancer patients. The management of cancer-related anorexia-cachexia is a great challenge in clinical practice. There are no definite practice guidelines yet for the prevention and treatment of cancer-related anorexia-cachexia. This study is considered to find out whether there is any role of mirtazapine in the improvement of anorexia in cancer patients. METHODS: A total of 80 cancer-anorexia patients were enrolled. Patients in the trial arm received the standard chemotherapy medication plus one tablet of mirtazapine 15 mg daily at night orally for 8 weeks starting from the day of an initial assessment. The control arm received the standard chemotherapy medication plus one tablet of megestrol acetate 160 mg daily orally for 8 weeks starting from the day of an initial assessment. Each patient was assessed by validated versions of Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy Anorexia/Cachexia Sub Scale v 4 questionnaires. RESULTS: After 4 and 8 weeks each patient was evaluated again using the Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy Anorexia/Cachexia Sub Scale tool. The quality of life of each patient was assessed by European Organization for Research and Treatment QLQ-C30 v 3.0. After 4 to 8 weeks of treatment, the Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy Anorexia/Cachexia Sub Scale score in cancer anorexia patients in the mirtazapine improved anorexia significantly. However, the improvement after 4 to 8 weeks was not statistically significant when it was compared with the megestrol acetate (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Therefore, the findings of this study reveal that mirtazapine might be a potential alternative to megestrol acetate, as it has shown potential efficacy as like as megestrol acetate.

Individual differences in the positive outcome from adolescent ketamine treatment in a female mouse model of anorexia nervosa involve drebrin A at excitatory synapses of the medial prefrontal cortex.

Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a mental illness with the highest rates of mortality and relapse, and no approved pharmacological treatment. Using an animal model of AN, called activity-based anorexia (ABA), we showed earlier that a single intraperitoneal injection of ketamine at a dose of 30 mg/kg (30mgKET), but not 3 mg/kg (3mgKET), has a long-lasting effect upon adolescent females of ameliorating anorexia-like symptoms through the following changes: enhanced food consumption and body weight; reduced running and anxiety-like behavior. However, there were also individual differences in the drug's efficacy. We hypothesized that individual differences in ketamine's ameliorative effects involve drebrin A, an F-actin-binding protein known to be required for the activity-dependent trafficking of NMDA receptors (NMDARs). We tested this hypothesis by electron microscopic quantifications of drebrin A immunoreactivity at excitatory synapses of pyramidal neurons (PN) and GABAergic interneurons (GABA-IN) in deep layer 1 of prefrontal cortex (PFC) of these mice. Results reveal that (1) the areal density of excitatory synapses on GABA-IN is greater for the 30mgKET group than the 3mgKET group; (2) the proportion of drebrin A+ excitatory synapses is greater for both PN and GABA-IN of 30mgKET than 3mgKET group. Correlation analyses with behavioral measurements revealed that (3) 30mgKET's protection is associated with reduced levels of drebrin A in the cytoplasm of GABA-IN and higher levels at extrasynaptic membranous sites of PN and GABA-IN; (5) altogether pointing to 30mgKET-induced homeostatic plasticity that engages drebrin A at excitatory synapses of both PN and GABA-IN.

Efficacy of antacids for cisplatin-induced gastrointestinal symptoms in the treatment of lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) and chemotherapy-associated dyspepsia syndrome (CADS) are frequently appearing adverse effects of cisplatin (CDDP)-containing chemotherapy. Antiemetic guidelines suggest that the administration of antacids such as proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or histamine type-2 receptor antagonists be considered for CADS, although their efficacy for treating these symptoms remains unknown. This study aimed to reveal whether antacids attenuate gastrointestinal symptoms in CDDP-containing chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 138 patients with lung cancer who received ≥ 75 mg/m2 CDDP-containing regimens were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into an antacid group including patients administered PPIs or vonoprazan during all chemotherapy periods and controls without antacid administration. The primary endpoint was the comparison of anorexia incidence during the first cycle of chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints were CINV evaluation and risk factor analysis for the incidence of anorexia using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The incidence of anorexia during the first cycle was 54.4% in the control group and 60.3% in the antacid group, without significant differences (p = 0.60). The incidence of nausea was also similar between the groups (p = 1.00). Multivariate analysis suggested that antacid administration was not associated with anorexia. CONCLUSION: Baseline antacid administration does not affect gastrointestinal symptoms associated with CDDP-containing treatment in lung cancer.

Analysis of adverse events leading to dose reduction/interruption of lenvatinib treatment in patients with Child-Pugh B unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to compare the safety of lenvatinib as first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with Child-Pugh A (CP-A) and Child-Pugh B (CP-B) and to determine the adverse events (AEs) that cause dose reduction/interruption of treatment in patients with CP-B. METHODS: Sixty-six patients with lenvatinib as a first-line treatment for HCC at Ogaki Municipal Hospital (Ogaki, Japan) between April 2018 and January 2022 were retrospectively evaluated. We analyzed the treatment duration, AEs, and reasons for dose reduction/interruption associated with lenvatinib treatment in patients with CP-A and CP-B HCC. RESULTS: The CP-B group had significantly more cases of grade ≥ 2 fatigue and anorexia than the CP-A group (p = 0.045 and p = 0.042, respectively). Regarding AEs that caused dose reduction/interruption of treatment, the CP-A group had significantly more cases of proteinuria than the CP-B group (p = 0.015), whereas the CP-B group had significantly more cases of hand-foot syndrome (HFS) than the CP-A group (p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Patients with CP-B have greater difficulty than patients with CP-A in continuing treatment with repeated dose reductions/interruption of treatment due to intolerable grade ≥ 2 AEs (fatigue and anorexia). HFS is more likely to cause dose reduction/interruption of treatment in CP-B than in CP-A unresectable HCC.

The influence of Chinese herbal medicines on cancer-related pressure ulcer wound, fatigue, constipation, and anorexia: A meta-analysis.

We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the influence of Chinese herbal medicines on cancer-related pressure ulcer wounds, fatigue, constipation, and anorexia. A systematic literature search up to March 2022 was done and 25 studies included 1777 subjects with cancer-related symptoms at the start of the study; 953 of them were provided with Chinese herbal medicines and 824 were control. They were reporting relationships about the influence of Chinese herbal medicines on cancer-related pressure ulcer wounds, fatigue, constipation, and anorexia. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the influence of Chinese herbal medicines on cancer-related pressure ulcer wounds, fatigue, constipation, and anorexia using the dichotomous method with a random or fixed-effect model. Chinese herbal medicines had significantly higher effectiveness in treating pressure ulcer wound (OR, 5.94; 95% CI, 3.94-8.95, P < .001), fatigue (OR, 2.81; 95% CI, 1.78-4.41, P < .001), and effectiveness on treating constipation (OR, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.57-4.25, P < .001) compared to control in subjects with cancer-related symptoms. However, Chinese herbal medicines had no significant effect on treating anorexia (OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 0.61-4.66, P = .31) compared to control in subjects with cancer-related symptoms. Chinese herbal medicines had significantly higher effectiveness in treating pressure ulcer wound, treating pressure ulcer wound, fatigue, and constipation compared to control in subjects with cancer-related symptoms. However, Chinese herbal medicines had no significant effect on the effectiveness of treating anorexia compared to control in subjects with cancer-related symptoms. Further studies are required to validate these findings.

A multicenter, open-label, single-arm study of anamorelin (ONO-7643) in patients with cancer cachexia and low body mass index.

BACKGROUND: Cancer cachexia is a syndrome characterized by anorexia and decreased body weight. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of anamorelin, an orally active, selective ghrelin receptor agonist, in patients with cancer cachexia and a low body mass index (BMI). METHODS: This multicenter, open-label, single-arm study enrolled Japanese patients with non-small cell lung cancer or gastrointestinal cancer with cancer cachexia (BMI < 20 kg/m2 , involuntary weight loss > 2% in the last 6 months, and anorexia). Patients were administered 100 mg of anamorelin once daily for up to 24 weeks. The primary end point was a composite clinical response (CCR) at 9 weeks, which was defined as an increase in body weight of ≥5% from the baseline, an increase of ≥2 points in the score of the 5-item Anorexia Symptom Scale of the Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy, and being alive. RESULTS: One hundred two patients were eligible and enrolled. The means and standard deviations for age and BMI were 71.0 ± 8.2 years and 17.47 ± 1.48 kg/m2 , respectively. The CCR rate at 9 weeks was 25.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.3%-35.3%), which met the primary end point with a lower 95% CI exceeding the prespecified minimum of 8%. Improvements in body weight and anorexia were durable and were accompanied by improvements in patients' global impression of change for appetite/eating-related symptoms and overall condition. Adverse drug reactions occurred in 37 of 101 treated patients (36.6%), with the most common being glycosylated hemoglobin increases, constipation, and peripheral edema. CONCLUSIONS: Anamorelin improved body weight and anorexia-related symptoms in patients with cancer cachexia and a low BMI with durable efficacy and favorable safety and tolerability. LAY SUMMARY: Anamorelin is a drug that stimulates appetite and promotes weight gain. This clinical trial was aimed at determining its efficacy and safety in Japanese cancer patients with a low body mass index and cachexia, a syndrome associated with anorexia and weight loss. Anamorelin was found to improve body weight and anorexia-related symptoms in these patients, and these effects were durable for up to 24 weeks. Moreover, anamorelin was generally well tolerated. These findings suggest that anamorelin is a valuable treatment option for patients with cancer cachexia and a low body mass index.

Atractylodin alleviates cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome by regulating NPY through hypothalamic Sirt1/AMPK axis-induced autophagy.

Cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome (CACS) is a complex syndrome associated with loss of muscle and adipose tissue and weight loss, and is a major lethal factor in the later stages of cancer. The mechanism of action of CACS is not fully understood and there are no drugs specifically approved for its treatment. Atractylodin, the main active component of Atractylodes lancea, is widely used in the treatment of digestive disorders and has the ability to reduce IL-1, IL-6 and TNF-α levels. Our results showed that gavage with Atractylodin increased body weight, muscle and fat weight and reduced tumor weight and volume as well as abnormally high serum concentrations of the muscle atrophy-causing cytokines IL-1ß, IL-6 and TNF-α in CACS model mice. RT-PCR data revealed that Atractylodin promoted the expression of the pro-feeding NPY and suppressed the expression of the anorexia POMC in the hypothalamus. Western blot results showed that Atractylodin promoted the expression of Sirt1 and p-AMPK in the hypothalamus, accompanied by an increase in autophagy. Furthermore, the Sirt1 inhibitor EX527 or AMPK inhibitor Compound C (CC) reversed Atractylodin-induced beneficial effects in CACS model mice. In hypothalamic cells subjected to glucose deprivation, Atractylodin increased NPY mRNA expression by enhancing AMPK-modulated autophagy; while EX527 or Compound C blunted Atractylodin-induced autophagy enhancement effect in vitro. In conclusion, Atractylodin can be used as an anti-cachexia drug and the underlying mechanism may involve the promotion of NPY expression by Sirt1/AMPK-regulated autophagy.

Omega-3 fatty acids and autonomic function in adolescents with anorexia: A randomized trial.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) have autonomic nervous system (ANS) dysfunction as measured by heart rate variability (HRV). Omega-3 fatty acids may improve heart rate regulation. Our aim was to describe ANS response to a mid-day meal in adolescent females with AN in a 12-week treatment program, randomized to receive either omega-3 supplements or placebo. METHODS: This pilot study was a longitudinal, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Each group was subdivided into an acutely ill cohort and a chronically ill cohort. Linear and non-linear measures of slope, mean, and pre/post-meal changes in HRV were measured at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-four women (n = 12 placebo; n = 12 omega-3) were enrolled. By program end, the acute omega-3 group alone showed no change in any pre-meal slope. Acute and chronic omega-3 groups, but not placebo groups, demonstrated physiologically expected post-meal heart rate increases at 12 weeks. For all measures at 6 and 12 weeks, the chronic placebo and omega-3 groups had smaller physiologic responses to the meal compared with the acute groups. CONCLUSIONS: Participation in a 12-week partial hospitalization program may improve autonomic function in response to mealtime, with possible additional benefit from omega-3 PUFA, particularly in those with acute illness. IMPACT: Autonomic function with meals improves with a 12-week partial hospitalization program in adolescent females with anorexia nervosa. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids may improve autonomic function, especially in adolescent females with acute forms of anorexia nervosa. Longer duration of illness in adolescent females with anorexia nervosa is associated with blunted autonomic response to meals.

Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) and semaglutide inhibit food intake and body weight through largely distinct, additive mechanisms.

AIMS: To evaluate whether the potent hypophagic and weight-suppressive effects of growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF15) and semaglutide combined would be a more efficacious antiobesity treatment than either treatment alone by examining whether the neural and behavioural mechanisms contributing to their anorectic effects were common or disparate. MATERIALS/METHODS: Three mechanisms were investigated to determine how GDF15 and semaglutide induce anorexia: the potentiation of the intake suppression by gastrointestinal satiation signals; the reduction in motivation to feed; and the induction of visceral malaise. We then compared the effects of short-term, combined GDF15 and semaglutide treatment on weight loss to the individual treatments. Rat pharmaco-behavioural experiments assessed whether GDF15 or semaglutide added to the satiating effects of orally gavaged food and exogenous cholecystokinin (CCK). A progressive ratio operant paradigm was used to examine whether GDF15 or semaglutide reduced feeding motivation. Pica behaviour (ie, kaolin intake) and conditioned affective food aversion testing were used to evaluate visceral malaise. Additionally, fibre photometry studies were conducted in agouti-related protein (AgRP)-Cre mice to examine whether GDF15 or semaglutide, alone or in combination with CCK, modulate calcium signalling in hypothalamic AgRP neurons. RESULTS: Semaglutide reduced food intake by amplifying the feeding-inhibitory effect of CCK or ingested food, inhibited the activity of AgRP neurons when combined with CCK, reduced feeding motivation and induced malaise. GDF15 induced visceral malaise but, strikingly, did not affect feeding motivation, the satiating effect of ingested food or CCK signal processing. Combined GDF15 and semaglutide treatment produced greater food intake and body weight suppression than did either treatment alone, without enhancing malaise. CONCLUSIONS: GDF15 and semaglutide reduce food intake and body weight through largely distinct processes that produce greater weight loss and feeding suppression when combined.

Effects of Rikkunshi-To, a Japanese kampo medicine, on donepezil-induced gastrointestinal side effects in mice.

Donepezil, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, is associated with gastrointestinal symptoms, such as nausea, vomiting, and anorexia, which may affect adherence to continuous therapy. Since Rikkunshi-To, a Japanese herbal medicine, activates the ghrelin signaling pathway and promotes gastrointestinal function, it is administered to prevent gastrointestinal symptoms. We herein investigated whether donepezil-induced gastrointestinal side effects in mice are ameliorated by Rikkunshi-To and if its therapeutic efficacy is mediated by ghrelin. Since pica behavior, the ingestion of kaolin, correlates with nausea and vomiting in humans, donepezil was intraperitoneally administered with or without Rikkunshi-To daily to mice, and food and kaolin intakes were monitored. The effects of donepezil on intestinal motility and a ghrelin receptor antagonist on donepezil-induced pica behavior, anorexia, and changes in intestinal motility were examined in mice treated with Rikkunshi-To. Pica behavior and anorexia were significantly induced by donepezil and significantly inhibited by Rikkunshi-To. Intestinal motility was significantly suppressed by donepezil and promoted by Rikkunshi-To. Furthermore, the therapeutic effects of Rikkunshi-To were antagonized by the ghrelin receptor antagonist. The present results support the therapeutic efficacy of Rikkunshi-To against donepezil-induced gastrointestinal side effects.

Incidence and outcomes of adverse drug reactions to first-line anti-tuberculosis drugs and their effects on the quality of life: A multicenter prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: In tuberculosis (TB) treatment, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) can interrupt treatment and decrease the quality of life (QoL). We aimed to prospectively investigate the incidence of ADRs to first-line anti-TB drugs and related outcomes and QoL. METHODS: Adult patients with TB who had been treated with first-line anti-TB drugs in five Korean hospitals were enrolled. ADR questionnaire surveys and blood tests were performed four times serially, and QoL was assessed on the fourth TB treatment week (±2 weeks). RESULTS: Of 410 enrolled patients with TB (males, 62%; mean age, 52.1 ± 18.1 years [those aged ≥65 years, 26.6%]), 67.8% experienced any ADRs (≥ grade 2) to TB drugs. The most common ADR was fatigue (53.2%), followed by itching (42.7%) and anorexia (41.7%). Older adult patients experienced relatively more ADRs, including anorexia, dyspepsia, rash, dizziness, anemia, abnormal hepatic/renal function tests, and increased uric acid levels (p < 0.05). Treatment regimens changed for 9.5% of patients owing to ADRs to anti-TB drugs. Patients with any ADRs and older adult patients had significantly lower QoL than their counterparts (p < 0.05). Old age (odds ratio [OR], 1.02) and being male (OR 2.65) were independently associated with ADRs, whereas active smoking (OR 4.73) and a relatively long treatment phase (OR 5.13) were independently associated with hepatotoxicity. CONCLUSION: ADRs to first-line anti-TB drugs were common and related to relatively low QoL, especially among older adults. Although 9.5% of patients had ADR-related regimen changes, most patients with ADRs completed treatments successfully.

Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) expert opinion/consensus guidance on the use of cannabinoids for gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with cancer.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal symptoms are common in patients with cancer, whether related to treatment or a direct effect of the disease itself. Patients may choose to access cannabinoids outside of their formal medical prescriptions to palliate such symptoms. However, clinical guidelines are lacking in relation to the use of such medicines for gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with cancer. METHODS: A systematic review of the evidence for the use of cannabinoids for symptom control in patients with cancer was undertaken. Search strategies were developed for Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, including all publications from 1975 up to 12 November 2021. Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials of cannabinoids compared with placebo or active comparator in adult patients with cancer, regardless of type, stage, or treatment status. Articles for inclusion were agreed by all authors, and data extracted and summarized by two authors. Each study was scored according to the Jadad scale. This review was specifically for the purpose of developing guidelines for the use of cannabis for gastrointestinal symptoms, including chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), chronic nausea, anorexia-cachexia syndrome, and taste disturbance. RESULTS: Thirty-six randomized controlled trials were identified that met the inclusion criteria for this review of gastrointestinal symptoms: 31 relating to CINV, one to radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, and the remaining four to anorexia-cachexia and altered chemosensory disturbance. The populations for the randomized controlled trials were heterogeneous, and many studies were of poor quality, lacking clarity regarding method of randomization, blinding, and allocation concealment. For CINV, eleven RCTs showed improvement with cannabis compared to placebo, but out of 21 trials where cannabis was compared to other antiemetics for CINV, only 11 favoured cannabis. CONCLUSION: Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and nabilone were more effective in preventing CINV when compared to placebo but are not more effective than other antiemetics. For refractory CINV, one study of THC:CBD demonstrated reduced nausea as an add-on treatment to guideline-consistent antiemetic therapy without olanzapine. The MASCC Guideline Committee found insufficient evidence to recommend cannabinoids for the management of CINV, nausea from advanced cancer, cancer-associated anorexia-cachexia, and taste disturbance. High-quality studies are needed to inform practice.

Propensity score-matching analysis comparing safety outcomes of appetite-stimulating medications in oncology patients.

PURPOSE: Anorexia and weight loss are common complications in the elderly, advanced cancer population. Appetite stimulants are commonly used therapies for oncology patients with weight loss, yet their safety comparison remains unknown. METHODS: This was a two-center, retrospective, study conducted in New York City at Mount Sinai Beth Israel and New York University Langone from January 2016 to July 2019 in adult patients with histologic evidence of malignancy who were taking either megestrol acetate or mirtazapine as an appetite-stimulating medication. Endpoints included safety concerns of mortality, QTc prolongation, venous thromboembolism, fall, somnolence, xerostomia, and hallucinations. Effectiveness of weight gain or maintenance of weight was not assessed. A propensity score-matching analysis was performed using a logistic regression analysis to assess the two comparable groups. RESULTS: The study included 350 patients (69.56 ± 13.31 years) with the most common malignancies being gastrointestinal, breast, and hematologic with metastasis present in over half the patients. Adverse events were commonly seen in the oncology population. After a propensity score-matched analysis, all safety outcomes associated with mirtazapine compared to megestrol acetate were similar; all-cause mortality (7%, n = 7 vs. 12%, n = 12, p = 0.23), QTc prolongation (31%, n = 31 vs. 31%, n = 31, p = 1.00), thromboembolism (11%, n = 11 vs. 11%, n = 11, p = 1.00), somnolence (29%, n = 30 vs. 22%, n = 23, p = 0.34), xerostomia (27%, n = 28 vs. 18%, n = 19, p = 0.24), and hallucinations (17%, n = 18 vs. 8%, n = 8, p = 0.06), respectfully. CONCLUSION: There were no safety differences seen when evaluating both agents.

Appetite stimulants for people with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Chronic loss of appetite in cystic fibrosis concerns both individuals and families. Appetite stimulants have been used to help cystic fibrosis patients with chronic anorexia attain optimal body mass index (BMI) and nutritional status. However, these may have adverse effects on clinical status. This is an updated version of the original review. OBJECTIVES: To systematically search for and evaluate the evidence on the beneficial effects of appetite stimulants in the management of cystic fibrosis-related anorexia and synthesise reports of any side effects. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register and online trials registries; handsearched reference lists; and contacted local and international experts to identify relevant trials. Last search of the Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register: 23 May 2022. Last search of online trial registries: 10 May 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials of appetite stimulants compared to placebo, control, no treatment or different appetite stimulants, or to the same appetite stimulants at different doses or regimens for at least one month in adults and children with cystic fibrosis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias of the included trials. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the evidence and performed meta-analyses. MAIN RESULTS: We included four trials (70 participants) comparing appetite stimulants (cyproheptadine hydrochloride and megestrol acetate) to placebo; the numbers of adults or children within each trial were not always reported. We assessed the certainty of evidence as low due to the small number of participants, incomplete or selective outcome reporting, and unclear risk of selection bias.  Regarding our primary outcomes, a meta-analysis of two trials (42 participants) showed that appetite stimulants may produce a larger increase in weight (kg) at three months (mean difference (MD) 1.25 kg, 95% confidence interval (Cl) 0.45 to 2.05), and one trial (17 participants) showed a similar result at six months (MD 3.80 kg, 95% CI 1.27 to 6.33) (both low-certainty evidence). Results also showed that weight z score may increase with appetite stimulants compared to placebo at three months (MD 0.61, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.93; 3 studies; 40 participants; P < 0.001) and at six months (MD 0.74, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.22; 1 trial; 17 participants). There was no evidence of a difference in effect between cyproheptadine hydrochloride and megestrol acetate for either outcome.   Only one trial (25 participants) reported analysable data for body composition (BMI), with results favouring cyproheptadine hydrochloride compared to placebo; a further trial (16 participants) narratively agreed with this result. All four trials reported on lung function at durations ranging from two to nine months. Considering analysable data, two trials (42 participants) found that appetite stimulants may make little or no difference in forced expiratory volume at one second (FEV1) % predicted at three months, and one trial (17 participants) found similar results at six months. Two further three-month trials narratively agreed with these results. Limited information was reported for secondary outcomes. Two trials (23 participants) reported results showing that appetite stimulants may increase appetite compared to placebo at three months (odds ratio 45.25, 95% CI 3.57 to 573.33; low-certainty evidence).  Only one study reported on quality of life, finding that cyproheptadine reduced fatigue in two participants compared with none with placebo. One study (25 participants) found no difference in energy intake between appetite stimulant or placebo at three months. Insufficient reporting of adverse effects prevented a full determination of their impact. Two studies (33 participants) narratively reported similar requirements for additional antibiotics between appetite stimulants and placebo at three months.  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: At six months in adults and children, appetite stimulants improved only two of the outcomes of this review: weight (or weight z score) and subjectively reported appetite. Insufficient reporting of side effects prevented a full determination of their impact. Whilst the data may suggest the potential use of appetite stimulants in treating anorexia in adults and children with cystic fibrosis, this is based upon low-certainty evidence from a small number of trials, therefore firm conclusions cannot be drawn. Clinicians need to be aware of the potential adverse effects of appetite stimulants and actively monitor any individuals prescribed these medications accordingly. Research is required to determine meaningful surrogate measures for appetite and to define what constitutes quality weight gain. Future trials of appetite stimulants should use a validated measure of symptoms including a disease-specific instrument for measuring poor appetite. This review highlights the need for multicentred, adequately powered, and well-designed trials to evaluate agents to safely increase appetite in people with cystic fibrosis and to establish the optimal mode of treatment.

Cancer cachexia: molecular mechanism and pharmacological management.

Cancer cachexia often occurs in malignant tumors and is a multifactorial and complex symptom characterized by wasting of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue, resulting in weight loss, poor life quality and shorter survival. The pathogenic mechanism of cancer cachexia is complex, involving a variety of molecular substrates and signal pathways. Advancements in understanding the molecular mechanisms of cancer cachexia have provided a platform for the development of new targeted therapies. Although recent outcomes of early-phase trials have showed that several drugs presented an ideal curative effect, monotherapy cannot be entirely satisfactory in the treatment of cachexia-associated symptoms due to its complex and multifactorial pathogenesis. Therefore, the lack of definitive therapeutic strategies for cancer cachexia emphasizes the need to develop a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms. Increasing evidences show that the progression of cachexia is associated with metabolic alternations, which mainly include excessive energy expenditure, increased proteolysis and mitochondrial dysfunction. In this review, we provided an overview of the key mechanisms of cancer cachexia, with a major focus on muscle atrophy, adipose tissue wasting, anorexia and fatigue and updated the latest progress of pharmacological management of cancer cachexia, thereby further advancing the interventions that can counteract cancer cachexia.

[Future Prospects of Cancer Cachexia].

Cancer cachexia(CC)is defined as a multifactorial syndrome that causes anorexia and an ongoing loss of skeletal muscle mass(with or without loss of fat mass). In 2011, the definition of CC was established and in 2021, the novel anti-CC drug, anamorelin was launched in Japan. A new era of CC treatment has begun. However, although anamorelin alone has been shown to increase appetite and lean body mass, it has not been shown to restore skeletal muscle function. Therefore, combined intervention therapy that combines nutrition and exercise interventions is required. Those non-pharmacologic therapy are not yet established, but clinical trials are currently underway in Japan or European countries. Further work on CC is underway to elucidate the mechanisms, establish biomarkers, develop new pharmacotherapies targeting the markers, establish new diagnostic and pathological assessment methods, and establish predictors of the efficacy of anamorelin.

Noradrenaline signaling in the LPBN mediates amylin's and salmon calcitonin's hypophagic effect in male rats.

The LPBN (lateral parabrachial nucleus) plays an important role in feeding control. CGRP (calcitonin gene-related peptide) LPBN neurons activation mediates the anorectic effects of different gut-derived peptides, including amylin. Amylin and its long acting analog sCT (salmon calcitonin) exert their anorectic actions primarily by directly activating neurons located in the area postrema (AP). A large proportion of projections from the AP and the adjacent nucleus of the solitary tractNTS to the LPBN, are noradrenergic (NA), and amylin-activated NAAP neurons are critical in mediating amylin's hypophagic effects. Here, we determine the functional role of NAAP amylin activated neurons to activate CGRP and non-CGRP LPBN neurons. To this end, NA was specifically depleted in the rat LPBN through a stereotaxic microinfusion of 6-OHDA, a neurotoxic agent that destroys NA terminals. While amylin (50 µg/kg) and sCT (5 µg/kg) reduced eating in sham-lesioned rats, no reduction in feeding occurred in NA-depleted animals. Further, the amylin-induced c-Fos response in the LPBN and c-Fos/CGRP colocalization were reduced in NA-depleted animals compared to controls. We conclude that AP â†’ LPBN NA signaling, through the activation of LPBN CGRP neurons, mediates part of amylin's hypophagic effect.