Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 3.924
Filtrar
Más filtros

Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
N Engl J Med ; 390(5): 409-420, 2024 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38294973

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Studies evaluating surgical-site infection have had conflicting results with respect to the use of alcohol solutions containing iodine povacrylex or chlorhexidine gluconate as skin antisepsis before surgery to repair a fractured limb (i.e., an extremity fracture). METHODS: In a cluster-randomized, crossover trial at 25 hospitals in the United States and Canada, we randomly assigned hospitals to use a solution of 0.7% iodine povacrylex in 74% isopropyl alcohol (iodine group) or 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol (chlorhexidine group) as preoperative antisepsis for surgical procedures to repair extremity fractures. Every 2 months, the hospitals alternated interventions. Separate populations of patients with either open or closed fractures were enrolled and included in the analysis. The primary outcome was surgical-site infection, which included superficial incisional infection within 30 days or deep incisional or organ-space infection within 90 days. The secondary outcome was unplanned reoperation for fracture-healing complications. RESULTS: A total of 6785 patients with a closed fracture and 1700 patients with an open fracture were included in the trial. In the closed-fracture population, surgical-site infection occurred in 77 patients (2.4%) in the iodine group and in 108 patients (3.3%) in the chlorhexidine group (odds ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55 to 1.00; P = 0.049). In the open-fracture population, surgical-site infection occurred in 54 patients (6.5%) in the iodine group and in 60 patients (7.3%) in the chlorhexidine group (odd ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.58 to 1.27; P = 0.45). The frequencies of unplanned reoperation, 1-year outcomes, and serious adverse events were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with closed extremity fractures, skin antisepsis with iodine povacrylex in alcohol resulted in fewer surgical-site infections than antisepsis with chlorhexidine gluconate in alcohol. In patients with open fractures, the results were similar in the two groups. (Funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research; PREPARE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03523962.).


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales , Clorhexidina , Fijación de Fractura , Fracturas Óseas , Yodo , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Humanos , 2-Propanol/administración & dosificación , 2-Propanol/efectos adversos , 2-Propanol/uso terapéutico , Antiinfecciosos Locales/administración & dosificación , Antiinfecciosos Locales/efectos adversos , Antiinfecciosos Locales/uso terapéutico , Antisepsia/métodos , Canadá , Clorhexidina/administración & dosificación , Clorhexidina/efectos adversos , Clorhexidina/uso terapéutico , Etanol , Extremidades/lesiones , Extremidades/microbiología , Extremidades/cirugía , Yodo/administración & dosificación , Yodo/efectos adversos , Yodo/uso terapéutico , Cuidados Preoperatorios/efectos adversos , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Piel/microbiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Estudios Cruzados , Estados Unidos
2.
N Engl J Med ; 389(19): 1766-1777, 2023 Nov 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37815935

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Nursing home residents are at high risk for infection, hospitalization, and colonization with multidrug-resistant organisms. METHODS: We performed a cluster-randomized trial of universal decolonization as compared with routine-care bathing in nursing homes. The trial included an 18-month baseline period and an 18-month intervention period. Decolonization entailed the use of chlorhexidine for all routine bathing and showering and administration of nasal povidone-iodine twice daily for the first 5 days after admission and then twice daily for 5 days every other week. The primary outcome was transfer to a hospital due to infection. The secondary outcome was transfer to a hospital for any reason. An intention-to-treat (as-assigned) difference-in-differences analysis was performed for each outcome with the use of generalized linear mixed models to compare the intervention period with the baseline period across trial groups. RESULTS: Data were obtained from 28 nursing homes with a total of 28,956 residents. Among the transfers to a hospital in the routine-care group, 62.2% (the mean across facilities) were due to infection during the baseline period and 62.6% were due to infection during the intervention period (risk ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96 to 1.04). The corresponding values in the decolonization group were 62.9% and 52.2% (risk ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.79 to 0.88), for a difference in risk ratio, as compared with routine care, of 16.6% (95% CI, 11.0 to 21.8; P<0.001). Among the discharges from the nursing home in the routine-care group, transfer to a hospital for any reason accounted for 36.6% during the baseline period and for 39.2% during the intervention period (risk ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.12). The corresponding values in the decolonization group were 35.5% and 32.4% (risk ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.88 to 0.96), for a difference in risk ratio, as compared with routine care, of 14.6% (95% CI, 9.7 to 19.2). The number needed to treat was 9.7 to prevent one infection-related hospitalization and 8.9 to prevent one hospitalization for any reason. CONCLUSIONS: In nursing homes, universal decolonization with chlorhexidine and nasal iodophor led to a significantly lower risk of transfer to a hospital due to infection than routine care. (Funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Protect ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03118232.).


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales , Infecciones Asintomáticas , Clorhexidina , Infección Hospitalaria , Casas de Salud , Povidona Yodada , Humanos , Administración Cutánea , Administración Intranasal , Antiinfecciosos Locales/administración & dosificación , Antiinfecciosos Locales/uso terapéutico , Baños , Clorhexidina/administración & dosificación , Clorhexidina/uso terapéutico , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Infección Hospitalaria/terapia , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Casas de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Transferencia de Pacientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Povidona Yodada/administración & dosificación , Povidona Yodada/uso terapéutico , Cuidados de la Piel/métodos , Infecciones Asintomáticas/terapia
3.
World J Urol ; 42(1): 252, 2024 Apr 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38652324

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To prevent infectious complications after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-PB), some studies have investigated the efficacy of rectal disinfection using povidone-iodine (PI) and antibiotic prophylaxis (AP). OBJECTIVE: To summarize available data and compare the efficacy of rectal disinfection using PI with non-PI methods prior to TRUS-PB. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Three databases were queried through November 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) analyzing patients who underwent TRUS-PB. We compared the effectiveness of rectal disinfection between PI groups and non-PI groups with or without AP. The primary outcomes of interest were the rates of overall infectious complications, fever, and sepsis. Subgroups analyses were conducted to assess the differential outcomes in patients using fluoroquinolone groups compared to those using other antibiotics groups. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: We included ten RCTs in the meta-analyses. The overall rates of infectious complications were significantly lower when rectal disinfection with PI was performed (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.42-0.74, p < 0.001). Compared to AP monotherapy, the combination of AP and PI was associated with significantly lower risk of infectious complications (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.40-0.73, p < 0.001) and fever (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.30-0.75, p = 0.001), but not with sepsis (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.23-1.04, p = 0.06). The use of fluoroquinolone antibiotics was associated with a lower risk of infectious complications and fever compared to non-FQ antibiotics. CONCLUSION: Rectal disinfection with PI significantly reduces the rates of infectious complications and fever in patients undergoing TRUS-PB. However, this approach does not show a significant impact on reducing the rate of sepsis following the procedure.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen , Povidona Yodada , Próstata , Recto , Humanos , Masculino , Antiinfecciosos Locales/uso terapéutico , Antiinfecciosos Locales/administración & dosificación , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Desinfección/métodos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/efectos adversos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Povidona Yodada/uso terapéutico , Povidona Yodada/administración & dosificación , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología
4.
Pediatr Nephrol ; 39(7): 2171-2175, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38267590

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are a leading cause of hospitalizations and mortality among patients receiving hemodialysis (HD) therapy, especially those with a central venous catheter (CVC) for dialysis access. The use of chlorhexidine impregnated catheter caps (ClearGuard) has been associated with a decrease in the rate of HD catheter-related BSIs (CA-BSIs) in adults; similar data have not been published for children. METHODS: We compared CA-BSI data from participating centers within the Standardizing Care to Improve Outcomes in Pediatric Endstage Kidney Disease (SCOPE) collaborative based on the center's use of ClearGuard caps for patients with HD catheter access. Centers were characterized as ClearGuard (CG) or non-ClearGuard (NCG) centers, with CA-BSI data pre- and post-CG implementation reviewed. All positive blood cultures in participating centers were reported to the SCOPE collaborative and adjudicated by an infectious disease physician. RESULTS: Data were available from 1786 SCOPE enrollment forms completed January 2016-January 2022. January 2020 served as the implementation date for analyzing CG versus NCG center data, with this being the time when the last CG center underwent implementation. Post January 2020, there was a greater decrease in the rate of HD CA-BSI in CG centers versus NCG centers, with a decrease from 1.18 to 0.23 and 0.41 episodes per 100 patient months for the CG and NCG centers, respectively (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Routine use of ClearGuard caps in pediatric dialysis centers was associated with a reduction of HD CA-BSI rates in pediatric HD patients.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Clorhexidina , Fallo Renal Crónico , Diálisis Renal , Humanos , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Diálisis Renal/métodos , Niño , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/etiología , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/microbiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Clorhexidina/uso terapéutico , Clorhexidina/análogos & derivados , Clorhexidina/administración & dosificación , Preescolar , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Antiinfecciosos Locales/administración & dosificación , Antiinfecciosos Locales/uso terapéutico
5.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 25(5): e232-e238, 2024 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38695702

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Ethanol lock therapy (ELT) is a potential method of central catheter salvage following central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) although there is potential risk of catheter damage in polyurethane catheters. Further, there is limited efficacy data across the spectrum of common pediatric catheters, and published ELT protocols describe dwell times that are not feasible for critically ill children. We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ELT in polyurethane catheters using brief (30 min to 2 hr) dwell times in our PICU. DESIGN: Investigational pilot study using historical control data. SETTING: PICU in quaternary care, free-standing children's hospital. INTERVENTIONS: ELT in polyurethane central venous catheters for catheter salvage. RESULTS: ELT with brief dwell times was used in 25 patients, 22 of whom were bacteremic. Ultimately 11 patients, comprising 14 catheters, were diagnosed with a primary CLABSI. The catheter salvage rate in primary CLABSI patients receiving ELT was 92% (13/14) and significantly higher than the salvage rate in patients receiving antibiotics alone (non-ELT) (62%, 39/64; mean difference 0.32, 95% CI [0.14-0.50], p = 0.03). The rate of catheter fracture in all patients receiving ELT was 8% (2/25) while the rate of fracture in the non-ELT group was 13% (8/64; mean difference -0.05, 95% CI [-0.18 to 0.09], p = 0.72). The rate of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) use in the ELT group was 8% (2/25), whereas the rate of tPA use in the non-ELT group was significantly higher at 42% (26/64; mean difference -0.34, 95% CI [-0.49 to -0.17], p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The use of ELT for catheter salvage and prophylaxis in the PICU is safe in a variety of polyurethane catheters. Dwell times ranging from 30 minutes to 2 hours were effective in sterilizing the catheters while allowing other therapies to continue. This approach may decrease the need for frequent line changes in a medically fragile pediatric population.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Etanol , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico , Poliuretanos , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Niño , Proyectos Piloto , Etanol/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Preescolar , Femenino , Lactante , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Bacteriemia/prevención & control , Bacteriemia/etiología , Antiinfecciosos Locales/administración & dosificación , Antiinfecciosos Locales/uso terapéutico
6.
Dermatol Surg ; 50(7): 627-629, 2024 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38518189

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lower extremity surgical sites are at an increased risk of wound infection following Mohs micrographic surgery. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the rate of lower extremity surgical site infections following a 14-day regimen of preoperative 4% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) rinses and postoperative wound occlusion for 14 days. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective data were collected from procedures performed by the senior author from January 2022 through June 2023. To meet inclusion, patients must have completed waist-down CHG soak and rinse for 14 days before surgery, including the day before surgery. In addition, the patient must have kept the dressing clean, dry, and intact until the postoperative appointment at 14 days. RESULTS: A total of 100 Mohs cases met inclusion criteria. Zero patients developed a surgical site infection. CONCLUSION: Chlorhexidine gluconate preoperative rinsing and postoperative occlusion for 14 days may minimize the risk of wound infection. Although further research is indicated, an opportunity exists for the adoption of CHG into routine clinical practice in the outpatient dermatology setting.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales , Clorhexidina , Cirugía de Mohs , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Humanos , Clorhexidina/análogos & derivados , Clorhexidina/administración & dosificación , Clorhexidina/uso terapéutico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Antiinfecciosos Locales/administración & dosificación , Antiinfecciosos Locales/uso terapéutico , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Cirugía de Mohs/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Extremidad Inferior/cirugía , Anciano de 80 o más Años
7.
JAMA ; 331(18): 1544-1557, 2024 05 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38557703

RESUMEN

Importance: Infections due to multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) are associated with increased morbidity, mortality, length of hospitalization, and health care costs. Regional interventions may be advantageous in mitigating MDROs and associated infections. Objective: To evaluate whether implementation of a decolonization collaborative is associated with reduced regional MDRO prevalence, incident clinical cultures, infection-related hospitalizations, costs, and deaths. Design, Setting, and Participants: This quality improvement study was conducted from July 1, 2017, to July 31, 2019, across 35 health care facilities in Orange County, California. Exposures: Chlorhexidine bathing and nasal iodophor antisepsis for residents in long-term care and hospitalized patients in contact precautions (CP). Main Outcomes and Measures: Baseline and end of intervention MDRO point prevalence among participating facilities; incident MDRO (nonscreening) clinical cultures among participating and nonparticipating facilities; and infection-related hospitalizations and associated costs and deaths among residents in participating and nonparticipating nursing homes (NHs). Results: Thirty-five facilities (16 hospitals, 16 NHs, 3 long-term acute care hospitals [LTACHs]) adopted the intervention. Comparing decolonization with baseline periods among participating facilities, the mean (SD) MDRO prevalence decreased from 63.9% (12.2%) to 49.9% (11.3%) among NHs, from 80.0% (7.2%) to 53.3% (13.3%) among LTACHs (odds ratio [OR] for NHs and LTACHs, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.40-0.57), and from 64.1% (8.5%) to 55.4% (13.8%) (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.60-0.93) among hospitalized patients in CP. When comparing decolonization with baseline among NHs, the mean (SD) monthly incident MDRO clinical cultures changed from 2.7 (1.9) to 1.7 (1.1) among participating NHs, from 1.7 (1.4) to 1.5 (1.1) among nonparticipating NHs (group × period interaction reduction, 30.4%; 95% CI, 16.4%-42.1%), from 25.5 (18.6) to 25.0 (15.9) among participating hospitals, from 12.5 (10.1) to 14.3 (10.2) among nonparticipating hospitals (group × period interaction reduction, 12.9%; 95% CI, 3.3%-21.5%), and from 14.8 (8.6) to 8.2 (6.1) among LTACHs (all facilities participating; 22.5% reduction; 95% CI, 4.4%-37.1%). For NHs, the rate of infection-related hospitalizations per 1000 resident-days changed from 2.31 during baseline to 1.94 during intervention among participating NHs, and from 1.90 to 2.03 among nonparticipating NHs (group × period interaction reduction, 26.7%; 95% CI, 19.0%-34.5%). Associated hospitalization costs per 1000 resident-days changed from $64 651 to $55 149 among participating NHs and from $55 151 to $59 327 among nonparticipating NHs (group × period interaction reduction, 26.8%; 95% CI, 26.7%-26.9%). Associated hospitalization deaths per 1000 resident-days changed from 0.29 to 0.25 among participating NHs and from 0.23 to 0.24 among nonparticipating NHs (group × period interaction reduction, 23.7%; 95% CI, 4.5%-43.0%). Conclusions and Relevance: A regional collaborative involving universal decolonization in long-term care facilities and targeted decolonization among hospital patients in CP was associated with lower MDRO carriage, infections, hospitalizations, costs, and deaths.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales , Infecciones Bacterianas , Infección Hospitalaria , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Instituciones de Salud , Control de Infecciones , Anciano , Humanos , Administración Intranasal , Antiinfecciosos Locales/administración & dosificación , Antiinfecciosos Locales/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Bacterianas/economía , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Infecciones Bacterianas/mortalidad , Infecciones Bacterianas/prevención & control , Baños/métodos , California/epidemiología , Clorhexidina/administración & dosificación , Clorhexidina/uso terapéutico , Infección Hospitalaria/economía , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/mortalidad , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Instituciones de Salud/economía , Instituciones de Salud/normas , Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales/normas , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Yodóforos/administración & dosificación , Yodóforos/uso terapéutico , Casas de Salud/economía , Casas de Salud/normas , Casas de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Transferencia de Pacientes , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/economía , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados de la Piel/métodos , Precauciones Universales
8.
Can Vet J ; 65(7): 675-681, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38952764

RESUMEN

Objective: Assessing effectiveness of circular (CM) and linear (LM) scrub methods using 3 different combinations of chlorhexidine in surgical field antisepsis in cats. Animals and procedure: Surgical field antisepsis was applied with 2 scrub methods (CM and LM) and 3 different chlorhexidine combinations (A1, A2, and A3) in 51 female cats undergoing ovariectomy. Sterile swabs collected from the surgical field pre- and post-antisepsis were inoculated in the laboratory and colony-forming units (CFU/mL) were quantified. Results: Following the application of antisepsis, the number of positive samples decreased in all groups (P < 0.05) when using both CM and LM, except for CM in the A1 group (P = 0.063). The CFU/mL counts also decreased after antisepsis with both CM and LM in all groups (P < 0.05). A high reduction in CFU/mL counts was observed after antisepsis with both CM and LM in all groups, but no significant differences were observed between the 2 scrub methods (P > 0.05). Conclusion and clinical relevance: Surgical field antisepsis in cats with CM and LM scrub methods, using 2% chlorhexidine combined with 70% ethyl or 70% isopropyl alcohol, or 1% chlorhexidine combined with 70% ethyl alcohol, can effectively reduce the bacterial load on the skin.


Efficacité de deux méthodes de désinfection avec différentes combinaisons de chlorhexidine pour l'antisepsie du champ opératoire chez le chat. Objectif: Évaluation de l'efficacité des méthodes de désinfection par mouvements circulaires (CM) et linéaires (LM) utilisant 3 combinaisons différentes de chlorhexidine dans l'antisepsie du champ opératoire chez le chat. Animaux et procédure: Une antisepsie chirurgicale sur le terrain a été appliquée avec 2 méthodes de désinfection (CM et LM) et 3 combinaisons différentes de chlorhexidine (A1, A2 et A3) chez 51 chattes subissant une ovariectomie. Des écouvillons stériles prélevés sur le champ opératoire avant et après l'antisepsie ont été inoculés en laboratoire et les unités formant des colonies (UFC/mL) ont été quantifiées. Résultats: À la suite de l'application de l'antisepsie, le nombre d'échantillons positifs a diminué dans tous les groupes (P < 0,05) lors de l'utilisation à la fois de CM et de LM, à l'exception du CM dans le groupe A1 (P = 0,063). Le nombre d'UFC/mL a également diminué après antisepsie avec CM et LM dans tous les groupes (P < 0,05). Une forte réduction du nombre d'UFC/mL a été observée après antisepsie avec CM et LM dans tous les groupes, mais aucune différence significative n'a été observée entre les 2 méthodes de désinfection (P > 0,05). Conclusion et pertinence clinique: L'antisepsie chirurgicale sur le terrain chez les chats avec les méthodes de désinfection CM et LM, utilisant 2 % de chlorhexidine combinée à 70 % d'alcool éthylique ou 70 % d'alcool isopropylique, ou 1 % de chlorhexidine combinée à 70 % d'alcool éthylique, peut réduire efficacement la charge bactérienne sur la peau.(Traduit par Dr Serge Messier).


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales , Clorhexidina , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Animales , Clorhexidina/administración & dosificación , Gatos , Femenino , Antiinfecciosos Locales/administración & dosificación , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/veterinaria , Ovariectomía/veterinaria , Antisepsia/métodos
9.
Pak J Pharm Sci ; 37(1(Special)): 185-189, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38747268

RESUMEN

Burn is a debilitating and devastating emergency with many physical and psychological sequelae. Essential steps in burn wound management include cleansing/wound debridement, application of topical antimicrobial and dressing of affected body areas. Objective of this study is comparison in effectiveness of Hydro-fiber Silver dressing and 1% silver sulfadiazine dressing in management of pediatric burn patients in terms of wound healing. After ethical approval, 264 patients were enrolled and divided into two groups. Patients were managed with hydro-fiber silver dressing in group A and 1% silver sulfadiazine dressing in group B. An experienced pediatric surgeon examined the wounds for re epithelialization and efficacy was labeled after 15 days. Out of 264 enrolled patients 148(56.06%) were males and 116(43.94%) were females. Mean age of patients was 3.73±2.34 years. Type of burn was Scald in 215(81.4%) patients and flame in 49(18.6%). Depth of burn was 2nd degree in 185(70.08%) patients and 3rd degree in 79(29.92%) patients. Mean TBSA was 19.93±9.62%. In group A the efficacy was achieved in 91(68.9%) patients whereas in group B the efficacy was achieved in 73(55.3%) patients (p-value<0.05). Hydro-fiber Silver dressing is significantly more efficacious as compared to 1% silver sulfadiazine dressing for treatment of pediatric burn.


Asunto(s)
Vendajes , Quemaduras , Sulfadiazina de Plata , Humanos , Sulfadiazina de Plata/uso terapéutico , Sulfadiazina de Plata/administración & dosificación , Quemaduras/terapia , Quemaduras/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Masculino , Preescolar , Niño , Cicatrización de Heridas/efectos de los fármacos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Lactante , Antiinfecciosos Locales/uso terapéutico , Antiinfecciosos Locales/administración & dosificación , Plata/uso terapéutico
10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38809813

RESUMEN

Triclosan is a broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent to which humans are widely exposed. Very limited data are available regarding the dermal toxicity and the carcinogenic potential of triclosan. In this study, groups of 48 male and 48 female B6C3F1/N mice were untreated or were dermally administered 0 (vehicle), 1.25, 2.7, 5.8, or 12.5 mg triclosan/kg body weight/day (mg/kg/day) in 95% ethanol, 7 days per week for 2 years. Vehicle control animals received 95% ethanol only; untreated, naive control mice were not dosed. There were no significant differences in survival among the groups. The highest dose of triclosan decreased the body weights of mice in both sexes, but the decrease was ≤8%. (Abstract Abridged).


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales , Triclosán , Animales , Triclosán/toxicidad , Triclosán/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Ratones , Masculino , Antiinfecciosos Locales/toxicidad , Antiinfecciosos Locales/administración & dosificación , Administración Cutánea , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Peso Corporal/efectos de los fármacos , Pruebas de Carcinogenicidad , Ratones Endogámicos , Carcinógenos/toxicidad , Carcinógenos/administración & dosificación , Carcinogénesis/inducido químicamente , Carcinogénesis/efectos de los fármacos
11.
Lancet ; 398(10312): 1687-1699, 2021 11 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34710362

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection (SSI) is the most common postoperative complication worldwide. WHO guidelines to prevent SSI recommend alcoholic chlorhexidine skin preparation and fascial closure using triclosan-coated sutures, but called for assessment of both interventions in low-resource settings. This study aimed to test both interventions in low-income and middle-income countries. METHODS: FALCON was a 2 × 2 factorial, randomised controlled trial stratified by whether surgery was clean-contaminated, or contaminated or dirty, including patients undergoing abdominal surgery with a skin incision of 5 cm or greater. This trial was undertaken in 54 hospitals in seven countries (Benin, Ghana, India, Mexico, Nigeria, Rwanda, and South Africa). Patients were computer randomised 1:1:1:1 to: (1) 2% alcoholic chlorhexidine and non-coated suture, (2) 2% alcoholic chlorhexidine and triclosan-coated suture, (3) 10% aqueous povidone-iodine and non-coated suture, or (4) 10% aqueous povidone-iodine and triclosan-coated suture. Patients and outcome assessors were masked to intervention allocation. The primary outcome was SSI, reported by trained outcome assessors, and presented using adjusted relative risks and 95% CIs. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03700749. FINDINGS: Between Dec 10, 2018, and Sept 7, 2020, 5788 patients (3091 in clean-contaminated stratum, 2697 in contaminated or dirty stratum) were randomised (1446 to alcoholic chlorhexidine and non-coated suture, 1446 to alcoholic chlorhexidine and triclosan-coated suture, 1447 to aqueous povidone-iodine and non-coated suture, and 1449 to aqueous povidone-iodine and triclosan-coated suture). 14·0% (810/5788) of patients were children and 66·9% (3873/5788) had emergency surgery. The overall SSI rate was 22·0% (1163/5284; clean-contaminated stratum 15·5% [454/2923], contaminated or dirty stratum 30·0% [709/2361]). For both strata, there was no evidence of a difference in the risk of SSI with alcoholic chlorhexidine versus povidone-iodine (clean-contaminated stratum 15·3% [223/1455] vs 15·7% [231/1468], relative risk 0·97 [95% CI 0·82-1·14]; contaminated or dirty stratum 28·3% [338/1194] vs 31·8% [371/1167], relative risk 0·91 [95% CI 0·81-1·02]), or with triclosan-coated sutures versus non-coated sutures (clean-contaminated stratum 14·7% [215/1459] vs 16·3% [239/1464], relative risk 0·90 [95% CI 0·77-1·06]; contaminated or dirty stratum 29·4% [347/1181] vs 30·7% [362/1180], relative risk 0·98 [95% CI 0·87-1·10]). With both strata combined, there were no differences using alcoholic chlorhexidine or triclosan-coated sutures. INTERPRETATION: This trial did not show benefit from 2% alcoholic chlorhexidine skin preparation compared with povidone-iodine, or with triclosan-coated sutures compared with non-coated sutures, in preventing SSI in clean-contaminated or contaminated or dirty surgical wounds. Both interventions are more expensive than alternatives, and these findings do not support recommendations for routine use. FUNDING: National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Global Health Research Unit Grant, BD.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales/administración & dosificación , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Suturas , Abdomen/cirugía , Adulto , Niño , Clorhexidina/administración & dosificación , Países en Desarrollo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Povidona Yodada/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Triclosán/administración & dosificación
14.
Biol Pharm Bull ; 45(2): 220-225, 2022 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34819410

RESUMEN

Olanexidine gluconate-containing preoperative antiseptic (OLG-C) is colorless, which makes it difficult to determine its area of application. To overcome this drawback, we realized a stable orange-tinted antiseptic (OLG-T) by adding new additives to OLG-C and investigated its pharmaceutical properties compared with OLG-C and povidone iodine (PVP-I). We evaluated the influence of the additives on the antimicrobial activity and adhesiveness of medical adhesives to OLG-T-applied skin by in vitro time-kill/ex vivo micropig skin assays and a peel test using excised micropig skin, respectively. In the in vitro time-kill assay, the bactericidal/fungicidal activity of OLG-T and OLG-C were equivalent. In the ex vivo micropig skin assay, their fast-acting and persistent bactericidal activities against vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis were higher than that of PVP-I. In the peel test, the adhesion force of the incise drape and the amount of stripped corneocytes on the peeled drape were comparable between OLG-T- and OLG-C-applied skin, but both were less than those of PVP-I-applied skin. The drapes for OLG-T- and OLG-C-applied skin had moderate adhesion force, and the drape-related injuries were expected to be weak. These results suggest that OLG-T performs no worse than OLG-C in terms of its antimicrobial activity and medical adhesive compatibility. Therefore, we expect OLG-T to lead to more convenient preoperative skin preparation and further contribute to lowering surgical site infection rates.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales/administración & dosificación , Compuestos Azo/administración & dosificación , Bacterias/efectos de los fármacos , Biguanidas/administración & dosificación , Colorantes de Alimentos/administración & dosificación , Glucuronatos/administración & dosificación , Piel/efectos de los fármacos , Adhesividad , Animales , Bacterias/crecimiento & desarrollo , Composición de Medicamentos , Femenino , Piel/microbiología , Porcinos
15.
Exp Eye Res ; 212: 108788, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34637791

RESUMEN

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of intravitreal povidone-iodine (PI) administration for the treatment of Candida albicans endophthalmitis. Forty New Zealand white rabbits were divided into four groups (n = 10 per group). After the induction of endophthalmitis using Candida albicans, groups A, B, and C received single intravitreal injections of 0.035 mg voriconazole, 0.3 mg PI, and their combination, respectively. Rabbits that were administered sham injections were in group D as controls. Fundus photography, vitreous culture, electroretinography (ERG), and histologic examinations of the retina were conducted on day 7. The anterior chamber flare (grade 0 to 4), severity of iritis (grade 0 to 4), and vitreous opacity (grade 0 to 3) were scored. Candida albicans was cultured in the vitreous sample. On day 7, the vitreous opacities were found in all groups. Compared to that in group D, groups A, B, and C showed a lower score for flare (p < 0.001) and iritis (p < 0.001) and less fungal growth in the vitreous culture (n = 2, 1, 1, and 10 in groups A, B, C, and D, respectively; p < 0.001). Furthermore, ERG and histologic findings demonstrated less affected a- and b-waves and damaged retinal tissues in groups A, B, and C. However, these findings were not different among groups A, B, and C. PI significantly improved Candida albicans endophthalmitis, and the effect was comparable that of the voriconazole, although some vitreous opacities remained. No synergistic effect of the combination of PI and voriconazole was observed. Intravitreal PI may be useful to treat Candida albicans endophthalmitis.


Asunto(s)
Candida albicans/aislamiento & purificación , Candidiasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Endoftalmitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Fúngicas del Ojo/tratamiento farmacológico , Povidona Yodada/administración & dosificación , Animales , Antiinfecciosos Locales/administración & dosificación , Candidiasis/microbiología , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Endoftalmitis/microbiología , Infecciones Fúngicas del Ojo/microbiología , Femenino , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Conejos
16.
Exp Eye Res ; 208: 108614, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33971221

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of intravitreal povidone-iodine (PI) in the treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis (VRE) endophthalmitis. Fifty New Zealand white rabbits were divided into 5 groups (n = 10 in each group). After the induction of endophthalmitis using VRE (minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] ≥ 40 µg/mL) in the right eye, Group A, B, C, and D received intravitreal injections of 0.1% PI, 0.3% PI, 0.05% vancomycin, and 0.5% vancomycin, respectively. Eyes in Group E were used as controls. Fundus photography, vitreous culture, electroretinography (ERG), and histologic examinations of the retina were conducted on day 14. A marked improvement in endophthalmitis was observed in Group A, B, C and D, compared to Group E. Fundus photographs showed mild vitreous opacities in Group A and B, and moderate vitreous opacity in Group C. All eyes in Group D had a clear vitreous. In vitreous culture, bacterial growth was found in 6 eyes (100, 200, 200, 400, 500, and 500 colony-forming units) in Group C, but not in Groups A, B, or D. ERG and histological examination also indicated intraocular damage in Group C. Our results show that intravitreal injection of PI, even at low concentrations, was effective for treatment of VRE endophthalmitis, although some vitreous opacity remained. Intravitreal vancomycin injection was also useful to treat resistant strains, if used at a higher concentration within the safety threshold.


Asunto(s)
Endoftalmitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Enterococcus faecalis/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones Bacterianas del Ojo/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/tratamiento farmacológico , Povidona Yodada/administración & dosificación , Resistencia a la Vancomicina , Animales , Antiinfecciosos Locales/administración & dosificación , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Electrorretinografía , Endoftalmitis/microbiología , Endoftalmitis/patología , Infecciones Bacterianas del Ojo/microbiología , Infecciones Bacterianas del Ojo/patología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/patología , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Conejos , Retina/patología , Cuerpo Vítreo/microbiología , Cuerpo Vítreo/patología
17.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 225(5): 560.e1-560.e9, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34473965

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Antiseptic vaginal preparation is recommended before gynecologic surgery; however, there is a lack of data regarding the effectiveness of different agents. OBJECTIVE: To compare rates of postoperative infectious complications and hospital utilization with preoperative vaginal preparation using povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine before hysterectomy. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent hysterectomy for gynecologic indications at 70 hospitals in a statewide surgical collaborative between January 2017 and December 2019. The primary outcome was postoperative infectious complications (including urinary tract infection, surgical site infections involving superficial, deep, or organ space tissues, or cellulitis) within 30 days of surgery. To adjust for confounding, propensity score matching, 1:1 without replacement and with a caliper of.005 was performed to create cohorts that had vaginal preparation with either povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine and did not differ in observable characteristics. We compared the rates of infectious morbidity and hospital utilization (emergency department visits, readmission, reoperation) in the matched cohorts. RESULTS: In the statewide collaborative, there were 18,184 patients who received povidone-iodine and 3018 who received chlorhexidine. After propensity score matching of 2935 pairs, the povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine groups did not differ in demographics, comorbidities, choice of preoperative antibiotics, benign vs malignant surgical indication, and surgical approach. Povidone-iodine was associated with a lower rate of infectious morbidity (3.0% vs 4.3%; P=.01), urinary tract infection (1.1% vs 1.7%; P=.03) and emergency department visits (7.9% vs 9.7%; P=.01) than with chlorhexidine. There were nonsignificant trends of lower rates of surgical site infection (2.0% vs 2.7%; P=.07) and reoperation (1.6% vs 2.1%; P=.18). CONCLUSION: This propensity score matched analysis provides evidence that povidone-iodine is preferable to chlorhexidine for vaginal preparation before hysterectomy because of lower rates of infectious morbidity and fewer emergency department visits. However, the absolute differences in infectious morbidity rates were approximately 1%, and in the event of an iodine allergy, chlorhexidine appears to be a reasonable alternative.


Asunto(s)
Clorhexidina/administración & dosificación , Histerectomía Vaginal , Povidona Yodada/administración & dosificación , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Antiinfecciosos Locales/administración & dosificación , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Análisis por Apareamiento , Persona de Mediana Edad , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Puntaje de Propensión , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Infecciones Urinarias/prevención & control
18.
Fish Shellfish Immunol ; 115: 179-188, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34153430

RESUMEN

Propolis is a viscous, waxy, resinous substance that is produced from the exudates of flowers and buds by the action of salivary enzymes of honey bees. Propolis may differ in color (brown, red or green), with color being influenced by the chemical composition and age of the product. Propolis has a special distinctive odor owing to the high concentration of volatile essential oils. It is composed of 5% pollen grains, 10% essential and aromatic oils, 30% wax, 50% resin and balsams, and other minor trace substances. Natural propolis products may be useful for a range of applications in aquaculture systems instead of relying on the application of synthetic compounds to manage many ailments that affect business profitability. It has been reported in several studies that propolis enhances performance, economics, immunity response and disease resistance in different fish species. This present review discusses the functional actions of propolis and the prospects of its use as an antimicrobial, antioxidant, immune-modulatory, antiseptic, antiparasitic, anti-inflammatory and food additive in aquaculture production. In summary, propolis could be a natural supplement that has the potential to improve fish health status and immunity thereby enhancing growth and productivity of the fish industry as well as economic efficiency.


Asunto(s)
Acuicultura , Peces/fisiología , Própolis/administración & dosificación , Própolis/química , Fenómenos Fisiológicos Nutricionales de los Animales , Animales , Antiinfecciosos/administración & dosificación , Antiinfecciosos/química , Antiinfecciosos Locales/administración & dosificación , Antiinfecciosos Locales/química , Antiinflamatorios/administración & dosificación , Antiinflamatorios/química , Antioxidantes/administración & dosificación , Antioxidantes/química , Antiparasitarios/administración & dosificación , Antiparasitarios/química , Aditivos Alimentarios/administración & dosificación , Aditivos Alimentarios/química , Factores Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Factores Inmunológicos/química
19.
BMC Infect Dis ; 21(1): 211, 2021 Feb 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33632143

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Inconsistent hand hygiene puts people who inject drugs (PWID) at high risk of infectious diseases, in particular skin and soft tissue infections. In healthcare settings, handwashing with alcohol-based hand rubs (ABRH) is recommended before aseptic procedures including intravenous injections. We aimed to evaluate the acceptability, safety and preliminary efficacy of an intervention combining ABHR provision and educational training for PWID. METHODS: A mixed-methods design was used including a pre-post quantitative study and a qualitative study. Participants were active PWID recruited in 4 harm reduction programmes of France and followed up for 6 weeks. After baseline assessment, participants received a face-to-face educational intervention. ABHR was then provided throughout the study period. Quantitative data were collected through questionnaires at baseline, and weeks 2 (W2) and 6 (W6) post-intervention. Qualitative data were collected through focus groups with participants who completed the 6-week study. RESULTS: Among the 59 participants included, 48 (81%) and 43 (73%) attended W2 and W6 visits, respectively. ABHR acceptability was high and adoption rates were 50% (W2) and 61% (W6). Only a minority of participants reported adverse skin reactions (ranging from 2 to 6%). Preliminary efficacy of the intervention was shown through increased hand hygiene frequency (multivariable linear mixed model: coef. W2 = 0.58, p = 0.002; coef. W6 = 0.61, p = 0.002) and fewer self-reported injecting-related infections (multivariable logistic mixed model: AOR W6 = 0.23, p = 0.021). Two focus groups were conducted with 10 participants and showed that young PWID and those living in unstable housing benefited most from the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: ABHR for hand hygiene prior to injection are acceptable to and safe for PWID, particularly those living in unstable housing. The intervention's educational component was crucial to ensure adoption of safe practices. We also provide preliminary evidence of the intervention's efficacy through increased hand hygiene frequency and a reduced risk of infection.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales/administración & dosificación , Etanol/administración & dosificación , Higiene de las Manos/métodos , Reducción del Daño , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/prevención & control , Adulto , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Autoinforme , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/etiología , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/prevención & control , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/complicaciones , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/epidemiología , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/psicología
20.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 84(4): 883-892, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33497750

RESUMEN

Cutaneous surgery has become critical to comprehensive dermatologic care, and dermatologists must therefore be equipped to manage the risks associated with surgical procedures. Complications may occur at any point along the continuum of care, and therefore assessing, managing, and preventing risk from beginning to end becomes essential. This review focuses on preventing surgical complications pre- and postoperatively as well as during the surgical procedure.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Dermatologicos , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Anestesia/métodos , Anestésicos , Antiinfecciosos Locales/administración & dosificación , Profilaxis Antibiótica/normas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Dermatologicos/efectos adversos , Susceptibilidad a Enfermedades , Fibrinolíticos/administración & dosificación , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Errores Médicos/prevención & control , Selección de Paciente , Premedicación , Gestión de Riesgos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/cirugía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA