Effectiveness of cannabidiol (CBD) on histopathological changes and gene expression in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) model in male rats: the role of Hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway.

The third most prevalent malignancy to cause mortality is hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The Hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway is activated by binding to the transmembrane receptor Patched-1 (PTCH-1), which depresses the transmembrane G protein-coupled receptor Smoothened (SMO). This study was performed to examine the preventative and therapeutic effects of cannabidiol in adult rats exposed to diethyl nitrosamine (DENA)-induced HCC.A total of 50 male rats were divided into five groups of 10 rats each. Group I was the control group. Group II received intraperitoneal (IP) injections of DENA for 14 weeks. Group III included rats that received cannabidiol (CBD) orally (3-30 mg/kg) for 2 weeks and DENA injections for 14 weeks. Group IV rats received oral CBD for 2 weeks before 14 weeks of DENA injections. Group V included rats that received CBD orally for 2 weeks after their last injection of DENA. Measurements were made for alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), malondialdehyde (MDA), and alpha fetoprotein (AFP). Following total RNA extraction, Smo, Hhip, Ptch-1, and Gli-1 expressions were measured using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). A histopathological analysis of liver tissues was performed.The liver enzymes, oxidant-antioxidant state, morphological, and molecular parameters of the adult male rat model of DENA-induced HCC showed a beneficial improvement after CBD administration. In conclusion, by focusing on the Hh signaling system, administration of CBD showed a beneficial improvement in the liver enzymes, oxidant-antioxidant status, morphological, and molecular parameters in the DENA-induced HCC in adult male rats.

Advances and Challenges in Modeling Cannabidiol Pharmacokinetics and Hepatotoxicity.

Cannabidiol (CBD) is a pharmacologically active metabolite of cannabis that is US Food and Drug Administration approved to treat seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, Dravet syndrome, and tuberous sclerosis complex in children aged 1 year and older. During clinical trials, CBD caused dose-dependent hepatocellular toxicity at therapeutic doses. The risk for toxicity was increased in patients taking valproate, another hepatotoxic antiepileptic drug, through an unknown mechanism. With the growing popularity of CBD in the consumer market, an improved understanding of the safety risks associated with CBD is needed to ensure public health. This review details current efforts to describe CBD pharmacokinetics and mechanisms of hepatotoxicity using both pharmacokinetic models and in vitro models of the liver. In addition, current evidence and knowledge gaps related to intracellular mechanisms of CBD-induced hepatotoxicity are described. The authors propose future directions that combine systems-based models with markers of CBD-induced hepatotoxicity to understand how CBD pharmacokinetics may influence the adverse effect profile and risk of liver injury for those taking CBD. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This review describes current pharmacokinetic modeling approaches to capture the metabolic clearance and safety profile of cannabidiol (CBD). CBD is an increasingly popular natural product and US Food and Drug Administration-approved antiepileptic drug known to cause clinically significant enzyme-mediated drug interactions and hepatotoxicity at therapeutic doses. CBD metabolism, pharmacokinetics, and putative mechanisms of CBD-induced liver injury are summarized from available preclinical data to inform future modeling efforts for understanding CBD toxicity.

Short-Term Cannabidiol with Δ-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol in Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Cannabis use is frequent in Parkinson's disease (PD), despite inadequate evidence of benefits and risks. OBJECTIVE: The aim is to study short-term efficacy and tolerability of relatively high cannabidiol (CBD)/low Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) to provide preliminary data for a longer trial. METHODS: Persons with PD with ≥20 on motor Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) who had negative cannabis testing took cannabis extract (National Institute of Drug Abuse) oral sesame oil solution for 2 weeks, increasing to final dose of 2.5 mg/kg/day. Primary outcome was change in motor MDS-UPDRS from baseline to final dose. RESULTS: Participants were randomized to CBD/THC (n = 31) or placebo (n = 30). Mean final dose (CBD/THC group) was 191.8 ± 48.9 mg CBD and 6.4 ± 1.6 mg THC daily. Motor MDS-UPDRS was reduced by 4.57 (95% CI, -8.11 to -1.03; P = 0.013) in CBD/THC group, and 2.77 (-4.92 to -0.61; P = 0.014) in placebo; the difference between groups was non-significant: -1.80 (-5.88 to 2.27; P = 0.379). Several assessments had a strong placebo response. Sleep, cognition, and activities of daily living showed a treatment effect, favoring placebo. Overall adverse events were mild and reported more in CBD/THC than placebo group. On 2.5 mg/kg/day CBD plasma level was 54.0 ± 33.8 ng/mL; THC 1.06 ± 0.91 ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS: The brief duration and strong placebo response limits interpretation of effects, but there was no benefit, perhaps worsened cognition and sleep, and there was many mild adverse events. Longer duration high quality trials that monitor cannabinoid concentrations are essential and would require improved availability of research cannabinoid products in the United States. © 2024 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Feasibility of a cannabidiol-dominant cannabis-based medicinal product for the treatment of long COVID symptoms: A single-arm open-label feasibility trial.

AIMS: To conduct a single-arm open-label feasibility trial of the safety and tolerability of a full-spectrum cannabidiol (CBD)-dominant cannabis-based medicinal product for treating the symptoms of long COVID. METHODS: The treatment phase ran for a total of 21 weeks, followed by ~3 weeks without the study drug. Participants received up to 3 mL of MediCabilis 5% CBD Oil (50 mg CBD/mL, <2 mg δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol/mL) per day orally. Monthly patient-reported outcome measures of common symptoms and daily self-report of symptoms were collected via a smartphone app. Key measures of heart rate, activity, sleep and oxygen saturation were assessed using wearable technology. RESULTS: Twelve (1 male, 11 female) individuals diagnosed with long COVID were recruited into the trial. All participants adhered to the treatment protocol for the duration of the study and there were no serious adverse events. Response rates for the research assessments were high with over 90% completion of patient-reported outcome measures and daily self-report. CONCLUSION: The study drug was safe and well-tolerated, demonstrating feasibility of CBD-dominant cannabis-based medicinal products in individuals diagnosed with long COVID. However, there were limitations in research design related to recruitment strategy demonstrating a lack of feasibility in the approach implemented in this study. Future work with larger samples and incorporating a control group are required to test the efficacy of this treatment.

Pharmacovigilance of unlicensed cannabidiol in European countries.

Cannabidiol (CBD) is a multitarget agent possessing anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. Unlicensed CBD gained public favor for the care of general health and well-being as well as to get comfort from inflammatory complaints, pain, anxiety, mood, and sleep disorders. Safety profile of unlicensed CBD has been not sufficiently described. For this reason, suspected adverse reactions (SARs) to CBD unlicensed products were analyzed. Serious SARs to unlicensed CBD products in EudraVigilance, a system purchased by the European Medicines Agency, were analyzed for age, sex of the patient, adverse reactions, indication for use, and concomitant drugs. Serious SARs were 18.9% of all adverse events to unlicensed CBD; they were more frequent in men and adult people and, to a less extent, in children (3-11 years). About sex, in EudraVigilance serious Individual Cases Safety Reports of SARs to CBD in men are in the largest number (58.8%) with respect to women. Unlicensed CBD was used in the 38.8% of cases for treatment of epilepsy; more frequent adverse effects were: mental disorders, hepatic disorders, and aggravation of pre-existing epilepsy. Drugs or substances more frequently associated with SARs were the antiepileptics clobazam and valproic acid, followed by cannabis. Results suggest that precautions and appropriate surveillance of adverse effects should be taken when unlicensed CBD is used.

Dosing of Cannabinoids Associated with an Opioid-Sparing Effect: A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies.

OBJECTIVE: To assess cannabinoid dosing that could be associated with a reduction in opioid use. DESIGN: Systematic review conducted according to the PRISMA statement. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and PsycINFO were searched up to December 10, 2022. REVIEW/ANALYSIS METHODS: We included randomized controlled trials (RCT) and longitudinal observational studies assessing cannabinoids effect on opioid use in patients with acute or chronic pain. Two reviewers independently assessed the studies for inclusion and extracted the data. Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), Cannabidiol (CBD), and other cannabinoids with dosing were the exposures. Change in opioid doses and opioid discontinuation were the outcomes. RESULTS: Fifteen studies (including seven RCTs) were included. Eight studies (six observational and two RCTs) were conducted among patients with chronic pain including three with cancer-related pain. Seven studies involved patients with acute pain (five RCTs).In chronic non-cancer pain patients, two observational studies that assessed THC and CBD in combination (average daily dose 17mg/15mg), and one that assessed a CBD-rich extract (31.4 mg/day), showed a significant reduction in opioid use. Of the three studies conducted on patients with cancer, only the observational study that assessed nabilone (average 1.7 mg/day) showed a significant reduction in opioid use. In patients with acute pain, only two observational studies that assessed dronabinol (5mg and 5-10 mg/day for four days) showed a significant reduction in opioid use. CONCLUSION: The opioid-sparing effect of cannabinoids remains uncertain based on current evidence. However, attention could be paid to cannabinoid doses associated with opioid reduction in included observational studies.

Synthesis and Antiallodynic Activity of Cannabidiol Analogue on Peripheral Neuropathy in Mice.

Cannabidiol (CBD) is a substance that exerts several therapeutic actions, including analgesia. CBD is generally administered orally, but its poor water solubility and metabolism impair its bioavailability. Thus, the development of molecules with better pharmacokinetic profile from cannabidiol becomes an interesting strategy for the design of novel analgesic drugs for the relief of painful conditions that are difficult to manage clinically, such as neuropathic pain. In the present study, an unprecedented analogue of CBD (1) was synthesized and some of its physicochemical properties were evaluated in silico as well as its stability in an acid medium. Additionally, its effect was investigated in a model of neuropathic pain induced by the chemotherapy drug paclitaxel in mice, in comparison with cannabidiol itself. Cannabidiol (20 mg/kg), pregabalin (30 mg/kg), or analogue 1 (5, 10, and 20 mg/kg), administered on the 14th day after the first administration of paclitaxel, attenuated the mechanical allodynia of the sensitized animals. The antinociceptive activity of analogue 1 was attenuated by previous administration of a cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist, AM 251, which indicates that its mechanism of action is related to the activation of CB1 receptors. In conclusion, the CBD analogue 1 developed in this study shows great potential to be used in the treatment of neuropathic pain.

Exploring the efficacy and safety of cannabidiol in individuals with epilepsy: an umbrella review of meta-analyses and systematic reviews.

BACKGROUND: Epilepsy ranks among the most prevalent neurological conditions worldwide. Cannabidiol (CBD) has received authorization for epilepsy treatment, yet utilizing CBD is linked to a variety of adverse events (AEs). This umbrella review aims to explore risk and frequency of AEs in epilepsy patients undergoing treatment with CBD. METHODS: International electronic databases comprising Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science were extensively searched from the most ancient data accessible until May 2024. In line with fundamental principle of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA), this umbrella review was executed. RStudio software version 2023.03.1 along with R software 4.3.2 was used for our statistical analyses. RESULTS: Thirteen meta-analyses and systematic reviews were included. CBD use in epileptic patients compared to controls can be meaningfully linked with 10.87% becoming seizure-free (RD: 10.87%, 95%CI: 2.39%, 19.34%; I2 = 80%). Compared to controls, a meaningful 73% increase in 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency was observed (RR: 1.73, 95%CI: 1.47, 2.03; I2 = 0%). In epileptic individuals who using CBD with the dosage of 20 mg/kg/d, a higher incidence of treatment withdrawal was detected (RR: 4.39, 95%CI: 2.46, 7.83; I2 = 0%). CONCLUSION: In this umbrella review of meta-analyses and systematic reviews, CBD use in epileptic patients was linked to an increased risk of ample AEs. Further research, specifically targeting various epilepsy categories, is essential to fully understand the effectiveness and potential side effects of CBD across different epilepsy forms.

High-purified cannabidiol efficacy and safety in a cohort of adult patients with various types of drug-resistant epilepsies.

About 30% of patients with epilepsy are drug resistant. Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), Dravet syndrome (DS) and tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) are diseases for which high-purified-cannabidiol (CBD) known as Epidiolex® (GW pharma) can be prescribed in add-on of other medications in case of drug-resistance. Currently, there are only a few recent data in the literature about the efficacy and safety of CBD in other forms of refractory epilepsies especially focal epilepsies in adults. We report retrospectively the experience of high-purified-CBD use in two French reference medical centers for epilepsy in various forms of drug-resistant epilepsy. We distinguished two groups of patients: group A with epileptic encephalopathies and group B with focal or multifocal epilepsy. Safety and efficacy (% of responder patients) were evaluated. Finally, 73 patients (51 in group A and 22 in group B) used high-purified CBD as an add-on treatment for their drug-resistant epilepsy. Patients in group A were significantly younger (P=0.0155), with a longer exposition of treatment (P=0.0497) than group B and with higher doses (P=0.0300). Respectively, 15 patients (29.4%) and five patients (22.7%) were responders during the follow-up period (P=0.552). The association with clobazam was more frequent in responders than in non-responder patients (16 patients [80%] versus four [20%]). The most frequent side effect was somnolence. At the end of follow-up, 15 patients in group A (29.4%) and nine patients in group B (40.1%) had stopped the high-purified-CBD treatment due to aggravation of seizure, absence of positive effects, or adverse events. This study showed no significant difference regarding the type of drug-resistant epilepsy and suggests that this treatment may be of interest for all types of drug-resistant epilepsy.

A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Efficacy and Safety of Cannabidiol in Idiopathic and Diabetic Gastroparesis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Cannabis (delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol), a nonselective cannabinoid-receptor agonist, relieves nausea and pain. Cannabidiol (CBD), a cannabinoid receptor 2 inverse agonist with central effects, also reduces gut sensation and inflammation. We compared the effects of 4 weeks of treatment with pharmaceutical CBD vs placebo in patients with idiopathic or diabetic (diabetes mellitus) gastroparesis. METHODS: We performed a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study of CBD twice daily (Epidiolex escalated to 20 mg/kg/d; Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Dublin, Ireland) in patients with nonsurgical gastroparesis with delayed gastric emptying of solids (GES). Symptoms were assessed by the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index Daily Diary. After 4 weeks of treatment, we measured GES, gastric volumes, and Ensure (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL) satiation test (1 kcal/mL, 30 mL/min) to assess volume to comfortable fullness and maximum tolerance. Patients underwent specific FAAH and CNR1 genotyping. Statistical analysis compared 2 treatments using analysis of variance including baseline measurements and body mass index as covariates. RESULTS: Among 44 patients (32 idiopathic, 6 diabetes mellitus type 1, and 6 diabetes mellitus type 2), 5 patients did not tolerate full-dose escalation; 3 withdrew before completing 4 weeks of treatment (2 placebo, 1 CBD); 95% completed 4 weeks of treatment and diaries. Compared with placebo, CBD reduced the total Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index score (P = .008), inability to finish a normal-sized meal (P = .029), number of vomiting episodes/24 hours (P = .006), and overall symptom severity (P = .034). Patients treated with CBD had a higher volume to comfortable fullness and maximum tolerance and slower GES. FAAH rs34420 genotype significantly impacted nutrient drink ingestion. The most common adverse events reported were diarrhea (14 patients), fatigue (8 patients), headache (8 patients), and nausea (7 patients). CONCLUSIONS: CBD provides symptom relief in patients with gastroparesis and improves the tolerance of liquid nutrient intake, despite slowing of GES. CLINICALTRIALS: gov NCT #03941288.

Cannabidiol-associated hepatotoxicity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Findings of liver enzyme elevations in recent cannabidiol studies have raised concerns over liver safety. This study aimed to determine the association between cannabidiol use, liver enzyme elevation, and drug-induced liver injury (DILI). METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, a search of EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Clinicaltrials.gov, Medline, medRxiv, and Web of Science of records up to February 2022 was conducted. Clinical trials initiating daily cannabidiol treatment with serial liver enzyme measures were included. The proportion of liver enzyme elevations and DILI were independently extracted from published reports. Pooled proportions and probability meta-analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Cannabidiol use was associated with an increased probability of liver enzyme elevation (N = 12 trials, n = 1229; OR = 5.85 95% CI = 3.84-8.92, p < 0.001) and DILI (N = 12 trials, n = 1229; OR = 4.82 95% CI = 2.46-9.45, p < 0.001) compared to placebo controls. In participants taking cannabidiol (N = 28 trials, n = 1533), the pooled proportion of liver enzyme elevations was 0.074 (95% CI 0.0448-0.1212), and DILI was 0.0296 (95% CI 0.0136-0.0631). High-dose CBD (≥1000 mg/day or ≥20 mg/kg/day) and concomitant antiepileptic drug use were identified as risk factors. No cases were reported in adults using cannabidiol doses <300 mg/day. No cases of severe DILI were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Cannabidiol-associated liver enzyme elevations and DILI meet the criteria of common adverse drug events. Clinicians are encouraged to screen for cannabidiol use and monitor liver function in patients at increased risk.

Cognitive Safety Data from a Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled Phase IIb Study of the Effects of a Cannabidiol and Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol Drug on Parkinson's Disease-Related Motor Symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Cannabis is increasingly available worldwide but its impact on cognition in Parkinson's disease (PD) is unknown. OBJECTIVE: Present cognitive safety data from study of an oral high-dose cannabidiol (CBD; 100 mg) and low-dose Δ9-tetrahydocannabinol (THC; 3.3 mg) drug in PD. METHODS: Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study of a CBD/THC drug administered for 16.3 (SD: 4.2) days, with dosage escalating to twice per day. Neuropsychological tests were administered at baseline and 1-1½ hours after final dose; scores were analyzed with longitudinal regression models (alpha = 0.05). Cognitive adverse events were collected. RESULTS: When adjusted for age and education, the CBD/THC group (n = 29) performed worse than the placebo group (n = 29) on Animal Verbal Fluency. Adverse cognitive events were reported at least twice as often by the CBD/THC than the placebo group. CONCLUSION: Data suggest this CBD/THC drug has a small detrimental effect on cognition following acute/short-term use in PD. © 2023 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Association of cannabis, cannabidiol and synthetic cannabinoid use with mental health in UK adolescents.

BACKGROUND: Cannabis has been associated with poorer mental health, but little is known of the effect of synthetic cannabinoids or cannabidiol (often referred to as CBD). AIMS: To investigate associations of cannabis, synthetic cannabinoids and cannabidiol with mental health in adolescence. METHOD: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis with 13- to 14-year-old adolescents across England and Wales in 2019-2020. Multilevel logistic regression was used to examine the association of lifetime use of cannabis, synthetic cannabinoids and cannabidiol with self-reported symptoms of probable depression, anxiety, conduct disorder and auditory hallucinations. RESULTS: Of the 6672 adolescents who participated, 5.2% reported using of cannabis, 1.9% reported using cannabidiol and 0.6% reported using synthetic cannabinoids. After correction for multiple testing, adolescents who had used these substances were significantly more likely to report a probable depressive, anxiety or conduct disorder, as well as auditory hallucinations, than those who had not. Adjustment for socioeconomic disadvantage had little effect on associations, but weekly tobacco use resulted in marked attenuation of associations. The association of cannabis use with probable anxiety and depressive disorders was weaker in those who reported using cannabidiol than those who did not. There was little evidence of an interaction between synthetic cannabinoids and cannabidiol. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this study provides the first general population evidence that synthetic cannabinoids and cannabidiol are associated with probable mental health disorders in adolescence. These associations require replication, ideally with prospective cohorts and stronger study designs.

Interactive Effects of Ayahuasca and Cannabidiol in Social Cognition in Healthy Volunteers: A Pilot, Proof-of-Concept, Feasibility, Randomized-Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Serotonergic hallucinogens and cannabinoids may alter the recognition of emotions in facial expressions (REFE). Cannabidiol (CBD) attenuates the psychoactive effects of the cannabinoid-1 agonist tetrahydrocannabinol. Ayahuasca is a dimethyltryptamine-containing hallucinogenic decoction. It is unknown if CBD may moderate and attenuate the effects of ayahuasca on REFE. PROCEDURES: Seventeen healthy volunteers participated in a 1-week preliminary parallel-arm, randomized controlled trial for 18 months. Volunteers received a placebo or 600 mg of oral CBD followed by oral ayahuasca (1 mL/kg) 90 minutes later. Primary outcomes included REFE and empathy tasks (coprimary outcome). Tasks were performed at baseline and 6.5 hours, 1 and 7 days after the interventions. Secondary outcome measures included subjective effects, tolerability, and biochemical assessments. RESULTS: Significant reductions (all P values <0.05) only in reaction times were observed in the 2 tasks in both groups, without between-group differences. Furthermore, significant reductions in anxiety, sedation, cognitive deterioration, and discomfort were observed in both groups, without between-group differences. Ayahuasca, with or without CBD, was well tolerated, producing mainly nausea and gastrointestinal discomfort. No clinically significant effects were observed on cardiovascular measurements and liver enzymes. CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence of interactive effects between ayahuasca and CBD. The safety of separate and concomitant drug intake suggests that both drugs could be applied to clinical populations with anxiety disorders and in further trials with larger samples to confirm findings.

Efficacy of cannabidiol in convulsive and nonconvulsive seizure types associated with treatment-resistant epilepsies in the Expanded Access Program.

The cannabidiol (CBD) Expanded Access Program (EAP), initiated in 2014, provided CBD (Epidiolex) to patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy (TRE). In the final pooled analysis of 892 patients treated through January 2019 (median exposure = 694 days), CBD treatment was associated with a 46%-66% reduction in median monthly total (convulsive plus nonconvulsive) seizure frequency. CBD was well tolerated, and adverse events were consistent with previous findings. We used pooled EAP data to investigate the effectiveness of add-on CBD therapy for individual convulsive seizure types (clonic, tonic, tonic-clonic, atonic, focal to bilateral tonic-clonic), nonconvulsive seizure types (focal with and without impaired consciousness, absence [typical and atypical], myoclonic, myoclonic absence), and epileptic spasms. CBD treatment was associated with a reduction in the frequency of convulsive seizure types (median percentage reduction = 47%-100%), and nonconvulsive seizure types and epileptic spasms (median percentage reduction = 50%-100%) across visit intervals through 144 weeks of treatment. Approximately 50% of patients had ≥50% reduction in convulsive and nonconvulsive seizure types and epileptic spasms at nearly all intervals. These results show a favorable effect of long-term CBD use in patients with TRE, who may experience various convulsive and nonconvulsive seizure types. Future controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Concomitant cannabidiol does not impact safety and effectiveness of diazepam nasal spray for seizure clusters: Post hoc analysis of a phase 3 safety study.

People with epilepsy may experience episodes of frequent seizure activity (seizure clusters, acute repetitive seizures), and benzodiazepines are the cornerstone of rescue treatment. Cannabidiol (CBD) can be used as an adjunctive treatment for epilepsy, and it may interact with other antiseizure drugs, such as benzodiazepines. Here, we examined the safety and effectiveness of intermittent use of diazepam nasal spray in patients with seizure clusters who also received CBD treatment. This analysis included data from patients aged 6 to 65 years enrolled in a phase 3, long-term safety study of diazepam nasal spray. Age- and weight-based dosing of diazepam nasal spray were administered during a 12-month treatment period. Concomitant CBD use was recorded, and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected. Of 163 treated patients, 119 (73.0%) did not receive CBD, 23 (14.1%) received the US Food and Drug Administration-approved highly purified CBD and 21 (12.9%) received another form of CBD. On average, patients receiving highly purified CBD were younger and more likely to have epileptic encephalopathies, including Dravet syndrome or Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, than patients who received another CBD preparation or no CBD. Rates of TEAEs and serious TEAEs were greater in patients who received any form of CBD (90.9% and 45.5%, respectively) compared with no CBD (79.0% and 26.1%, respectively). However, the lowest rates of TEAEs attributed to diazepam nasal spray were reported in patients who received highly purified CBD (13.0%), and this result was maintained in those who received concomitant clobazam. Use of second doses of diazepam nasal spray, a proxy for effectiveness, was lowest in the highly purified-CBD group (8.2%) compared with the no-CBD (11.6%) and other-CBD groups (20.3%). These results suggest that CBD does not alter the safety and effectiveness of diazepam nasal spray and supports concomitant use in appropriate patients.

Real-world, long-term evaluation of the tolerability and therapy retention of Epidiolex® (cannabidiol) in patients with refractory epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: Epidiolex® (CBD) is FDA-approved for seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), Dravet syndrome (DS), and tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). Phase III studies suggest that certain adverse effects (AEs), possibly linked to pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) interactions may be therapy-limiting. We sought to identify these factors that contribute to treatment success and retention of therapy. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective review of patients with refractory epilepsy taking Epidiolex® was performed. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to describe Epidiolex® retention, as a measure of overall effectiveness. RESULTS: One hundred and twelve patients were screened; 4 were excluded due to loss to follow-up or never starting Epidiolex®. Of 108 patients, mean age was 20.3 years (13.1, range 2 to 63), and 52.8% were female. Mean initial and maintenance doses were 5.3 mg/kg/day (1.3) and 15.3 mg/kg/day (5.8), respectively. At the final evaluation, 75% of patients remained on Epidiolex®. The 25th percentile for discontinuation was 19 months. 46.3% of patients experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse effect (TEAE) with 14.5% d/c Epidiolex® due to treatment emerging adverse effects (TEAE). The most common reasons for discontinuation were lack of efficacy (37%), increased seizure activity (22%), worsened behavior (22%), and sedation (22%). One out of 27 discontinuations was due to liver function test (LFT) elevations (3.7%). At initiation, 47.2% were concurrently taking clobazam, and 39.2% of those patients had an initial clobazam dose decrease. 53% of patients were able to either discontinue or lower the dose of at least one other antiseizure medication. SIGNIFICANCE: Epidiolex® is generally well-tolerated and the majority continued long-term treatment. Patterns of adverse effects were similar to clinical trials, however gastrointestinal complaints, and significant LFT elevations were less common. Our data suggest most patients discontinue within the first several months of treatment and suggest that further studies designed to evaluate early identification and potential mitigation of adverse effects and including drug interactions are warranted.

Cannabis use for Sleep Disturbance Among Older Patients in a Geriatrics Clinic.

Cannabis use is growing among older adults to manage medical concerns including poor sleep. In this study, we characterized how patients seen at a geriatrics clinic use cannabis to address sleep disturbance. Specifically, we conducted an anonymous survey of 568 adults, including 83 who reported cannabis use within the past 3 years, to inquire about such use. We compared cannabis use characteristics between those using it for sleep disturbance versus all other conditions. We considered a p-value <.10 to be statistically significant. Among the cannabis users in our sample, 29% reported using cannabis for sleep disturbance (N = 24). They were more likely than other users to be female (p = .07), consume cannabis more frequently (p = .01), use products containing tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) (vs. cannabidiol [CBD]-only; p < .01), and use cannabis to target more symptoms (p < .01). As cannabis use continues to grow in older populations, it is essential to delineate better how cannabis may be used safely and effectively to improve older adults' sleep health.

Characterization of the biochemical and behavioral effects of cannabidiol: implications for migraine.

Cannabidiol (CBD) is the main pharmacologically active phytocannabinoid. CBD exerts an analgesic effect in several pain models, does not have side effects and has low toxicity. The data about CBD mechanisms of action in pain and its therapeutic potential in this area are limited. Here, we tested CBD effects in animal models specific for migraine. We assayed CBD distribution in plasma and in cranial areas related to migraine pain in male Sprague Dawley rats treated chronically (5 days). Successively, we tested CBD activity on the behavioral and biochemical effects induced in the acute and the chronic migraine animal models by nitroglycerin (NTG) administration. In the acute migraine model, rats received CBD (15 mg or 30 mg/kg, i.p) 3 h after NTG (10 mg/kg i.p.) or vehicle injection. In the chronic migraine model, rats were treated with CBD and NTG every other day over nine days with the following doses: CBD 30 mg/kg i.p., NTG 10 mg/kg i.p. We evaluated behavioral parameters with the open field and the orofacial formalin tests. We explored the fatty acid amide hydrolase gene expression, cytokines mRNA and protein levels in selected brain areas and CGRP serum level. CBD levels in the meninges, trigeminal ganglia, cervical spinal cord, medulla pons, and plasma were higher 1 h after the last treatment than after 24 h, suggesting that CBD penetrates but does not accumulate in these tissues. In the acute model, CBD significantly reduced NTG-induced trigeminal hyperalgesia and CGRP and cytokine mRNA levels in peripheral and central sites. In the chronic model, CBD caused a significant decrease in NTG-induced IL-6 protein levels in the medulla-pons, and trigeminal ganglion. It also reduced CGRP serum levels. By contrast, CBD did not modulate TNF-alpha protein levels and fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) gene expression in any of investigated areas. In both experimental conditions, there was no modulation of anxiety, motor/exploratory behavior, or grooming. These findings show that CBD reaches brain areas involved in migraine pain after systemic administration. They also show for the first time that CBD modulates migraine-related nociceptive transmission, likely via a complex signaling mechanism involving different pathways.

Place of therapeutic cannabis in France and safety data: A literature review.

OBJECTIVES: To date, very few cannabis-based specialities are authorised on the French market despite a growing demand from patients and health professionals. The objective of this study is to review the tolerance profile and the French legislative status of the two main cannabinoids used for therapeutic purposes: tetrahydrocannabiol (THC) associated with psychoactive effects and non-psychoactive cannabidiol (CBD). METHODS: This review is based on relevant articles retrieved by a search in Google Scholar and PubMed databases and on an assessment of the legal texts and summaries of product characteristics available in France. RESULTS: Evidence for the tolerability of CBD during chronic use is reassuring, but a significant risk of drug interactions exists. THC use appears to be associated with a higher proportion of serious adverse effects, including neuropsychological and cardiovascular effects. Inhaled cannabis appears to be associated with greater toxicity than the oral route. These data are presented together with the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data of THC and CBD. CONCLUSION: The literature reports several frequent but rarely serious adverse effects of CBD during chronic use as well as a significant risk of drug interactions. THC use seems to be associated with a higher proportion of serious adverse effects compared to CBD, particularly at the neuropsychological and cardiovascular levels. Health professionals should be up to date on the particularities of therapeutic cannabis in terms of efficacy, safety and drug interactions.