RESUMEN
There is considerable literature showing that regional variation in the number of office-based physicians is rather explained by factors such as financial attractiveness of a region or employment opportunities for spouses than by health care needs of the population. It remains unclear, however, how much of the variation is explained by each of these determinants. The aim of the present study is to estimate the percentage contribution of a variety of determinants to the measured variation in Germany. Physician density is regressed on a well-defined set of explanatory variables that were identified as determinants of physician location. Regression-based decomposition was applied to decompose the variation in physician density into the percentage contribution of each of the determinants. The results show that varying health care needs of the population explained less than 5.2% of the variation in physician density. Percentage of population with private health insurance explained 14% of the variation in GP density and between 2% and 6% of the variation in specialists' density. For specialists, a higher share of variance was attributable to the variables measuring sociocultural amenities of a region compared to GPs.
Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Consultorios Médicos/provisión & distribución , Ubicación de la Práctica Profesional , Bases de Datos Factuales , Alemania , Planificación en Salud , Derivación y Consulta , Análisis de Área PequeñaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Office space and computer facilities offered to medical practitioners in departments of anaesthesia (DA) belonging to university hospitals in metropolitan France in 2002 were surveyed. METHOD: A questionnaire was mailed to the 72 heads of DA belonging to university hospitals in metropolitan France in order to assess: (1) the number of full time anaesthesiologists sharing each office; (2) whether a computer was provided to all full time anaesthetists who required one; (3) the adequacy of the offices in terms of the DA's needs; (4) the subjective appreciation of the comfort level of the DA office space when compared to other departments within the institution; (5) whether an office space with a computer was specifically reserved for fellows. RESULTS: Sixty-two replies were received (86.1%). Among full time anaesthesiologists surveyed:only 21.8% occupied an office alone; 1.2% had no office; 36.5, 21.7, 8.2, 3.4, 3.9, 3.2% shared one office with 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, more than 5 colleagues, respectively; 25.8% had a personal computer. Fifty percent of DA surveyed did not reserve a specific office for fellow's need; 75.8% of the offices surveyed were evaluated as being of inadequate comfort level; 64.5% of the offices surveyed were evaluated at a lower comfort level when compared to the office space of other departments within the institution. CONCLUSION: A high response rate was obtained. DA were found to be insufficiently provided with offices and computer facilities in french university hospitals. Such a situation, which is both surprising and questionable in an industrialised country, warrants a debate.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Anestesia en Hospital/organización & administración , Hospitales Universitarios/organización & administración , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Consultorios Médicos/provisión & distribución , Computadores/provisión & distribución , Recolección de Datos , Francia , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Remote practice offices (RPOs) offer unique opportunities for hospitals and physicians to increase market share from targeted areas where previously only limited demand existed. This article discusses the benefits and explores the fundamentals of developing a remote practice office.