The contribution of locational factors to regional variations in office-based physicians in Germany.

There is considerable literature showing that regional variation in the number of office-based physicians is rather explained by factors such as financial attractiveness of a region or employment opportunities for spouses than by health care needs of the population. It remains unclear, however, how much of the variation is explained by each of these determinants. The aim of the present study is to estimate the percentage contribution of a variety of determinants to the measured variation in Germany. Physician density is regressed on a well-defined set of explanatory variables that were identified as determinants of physician location. Regression-based decomposition was applied to decompose the variation in physician density into the percentage contribution of each of the determinants. The results show that varying health care needs of the population explained less than 5.2% of the variation in physician density. Percentage of population with private health insurance explained 14% of the variation in GP density and between 2% and 6% of the variation in specialists' density. For specialists, a higher share of variance was attributable to the variables measuring sociocultural amenities of a region compared to GPs.

[Survey of office space and computer availability offered to full time practitioners in departments of anaesthesia and intensive care of French university hospitals]. / Enquête sur les bureaux et l'équipement informatique mis à la disposition des anesthésistes-réanimateurs travaillant à plein temps dans les hôpitaux universitaires de France métropolitaine.

INTRODUCTION: Office space and computer facilities offered to medical practitioners in departments of anaesthesia (DA) belonging to university hospitals in metropolitan France in 2002 were surveyed. METHOD: A questionnaire was mailed to the 72 heads of DA belonging to university hospitals in metropolitan France in order to assess: (1) the number of full time anaesthesiologists sharing each office; (2) whether a computer was provided to all full time anaesthetists who required one; (3) the adequacy of the offices in terms of the DA's needs; (4) the subjective appreciation of the comfort level of the DA office space when compared to other departments within the institution; (5) whether an office space with a computer was specifically reserved for fellows. RESULTS: Sixty-two replies were received (86.1%). Among full time anaesthesiologists surveyed:only 21.8% occupied an office alone; 1.2% had no office; 36.5, 21.7, 8.2, 3.4, 3.9, 3.2% shared one office with 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, more than 5 colleagues, respectively; 25.8% had a personal computer. Fifty percent of DA surveyed did not reserve a specific office for fellow's need; 75.8% of the offices surveyed were evaluated as being of inadequate comfort level; 64.5% of the offices surveyed were evaluated at a lower comfort level when compared to the office space of other departments within the institution. CONCLUSION: A high response rate was obtained. DA were found to be insufficiently provided with offices and computer facilities in french university hospitals. Such a situation, which is both surprising and questionable in an industrialised country, warrants a debate.

Developing a remote practice office.

Remote practice offices (RPOs) offer unique opportunities for hospitals and physicians to increase market share from targeted areas where previously only limited demand existed. This article discusses the benefits and explores the fundamentals of developing a remote practice office.