Decompressive Craniectomy versus Craniotomy for Acute Subdural Hematoma.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic acute subdural hematomas frequently warrant surgical evacuation by means of a craniotomy (bone flap replaced) or decompressive craniectomy (bone flap not replaced). Craniectomy may prevent intracranial hypertension, but whether it is associated with better outcomes is unclear. METHODS: We conducted a trial in which patients undergoing surgery for traumatic acute subdural hematoma were randomly assigned to undergo craniotomy or decompressive craniectomy. An inclusion criterion was a bone flap with an anteroposterior diameter of 11 cm or more. The primary outcome was the rating on the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) (an 8-point scale, ranging from death to "upper good recovery" [no injury-related problems]) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included the GOSE rating at 6 months and quality of life as assessed by the EuroQol Group 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). RESULTS: A total of 228 patients were assigned to the craniotomy group and 222 to the decompressive craniectomy group. The median diameter of the bone flap was 13 cm (interquartile range, 12 to 14) in both groups. The common odds ratio for the differences across GOSE ratings at 12 months was 0.85 (95% confidence interval, 0.60 to 1.18; P = 0.32). Results were similar at 6 months. At 12 months, death had occurred in 30.2% of the patients in the craniotomy group and in 32.2% of those in the craniectomy group; a vegetative state occurred in 2.3% and 2.8%, respectively, and a lower or upper good recovery occurred in 25.6% and 19.9%. EQ-5D-5L scores were similar in the two groups at 12 months. Additional cranial surgery within 2 weeks after randomization was performed in 14.6% of the craniotomy group and in 6.9% of the craniectomy group. Wound complications occurred in 3.9% of the craniotomy group and in 12.2% of the craniectomy group. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with traumatic acute subdural hematoma who underwent craniotomy or decompressive craniectomy, disability and quality-of-life outcomes were similar with the two approaches. Additional surgery was performed in a higher proportion of the craniotomy group, but more wound complications occurred in the craniectomy group. (Funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research; RESCUE-ASDH ISRCTN Registry number, ISRCTN87370545.).

Cortical resting motor threshold difference in asleep-awake craniotomy for motor eloquent gliomas: WHO grading influences motor pathway excitability.

Developing neurophysiological tools to predict WHO tumor grade can empower the treating teams for a better surgical decision-making process. A total of 38 patients with supratentorial diffuse gliomas underwent an asleep-awake-sedated craniotomies for tumor removal with intraoperative neuromonitoring. The resting motor threshold was calculated for different train stimulation paradigms during awake and asleep phases. Receiver operating characteristic analysis and Bayesian regression models were performed to analyze the prediction of tumor grading based on the resting motor threshold differences. Significant positive spearman correlations were observed between resting motor threshold excitability difference and WHO tumor grade for train stimulation paradigms of 5 (R = 0.54, P = 0.00063), 4 (R = 0.49, P = 0.002), 3 (R = 0.51, P = 0.001), and 2 pulses (R = 0.54, P = 0.0007). Kruskal-Wallis analysis of the median revealed a positive significant difference between the median of excitability difference and WHO tumor grade in all paradigms. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed 3 mA difference as the best predictor of high-grade glioma across different patterns of motor pathway stimulation. Bayesian regression found that an excitability difference above 3 mA would indicate a 75.8% probability of a glioma being high grade. Our results suggest that cortical motor excitability difference between the asleep and awake phases in glioma surgery could correlate with tumor grade.

Onabotulinumtoxina (craniotomy scar combined with cranial suture line injections) for persistent post craniotomy headache: Case series with long-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND: There is no defined preventive treatment protocol for persistent post-craniotomy headache. In several small case series and individual case reports onabotulinumtoxinA injected into the craniotomy scar has shown possible efficacy. What is lacking is long term follow-up and if focusing on the cranial suture lines along with the craniotomy scar can enhance improvement and provide more sustained benefit. METHODS: Retrospective chart review with case series. RESULTS: Four patients (three women, one man) with ICHD-3 defined persistent post craniotomy headache were treated using a novel onabotulinumtoxinA injection protocol. All the patients presented with continuous head pain of moderate to severe intensity. All had severe allodynia on the side of their craniotomy. All had significant reduction in quality of life. Our application of onabotulinumtoxinA involved injection into both the surgical scar and the transected/irritated cranial suture lines noted on neuroimaging and physical examination. With treatment all patients demonstrated significant benefit including a reduction in daily pain intensity (75%-100%), developing periods of pain freedom (2-7 days per week) and having a dramatic improvement in quality of life (close to 100% in all). The benefit was sustained for at least five years of follow-up. CONCLUSION: From our case series it appears that injection not only along the painful craniotomy scar but into the involved cranial suture lines provides positive efficacy and sustained improvement in patients with persistent post craniotomy headache.

Study of symptom clusters in brain tumor patients 2 weeks after craniotomy.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to identify potential symptom clusters among primary brain tumor patients using factor analysis. Understanding these clusters enables better-targeted interventions post-craniotomy. METHODS: A total of 211 participants visiting Department of Neurosurgery at Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital for proposed surgical treatment between January 2021 and March 2022 were enrolled. Two weeks after craniotomy, the patients' symptoms were measured using MDASI-BT (M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory Brain Tumor Module), and factor analysis was performed to identify symptom clusters. RESULTS: A total of three symptom clusters, i.e., symptom cluster 1, symptom cluster 2, and symptom cluster 3, were identified. Among them, symptom cluster 1 represented the fatigue-related symptom cluster, including fatigue, lethargy, dry mouth, pain, and sleep disturbance (Cronbach's α = 0.742); symptom cluster 2 represented the gut-brain axis symptom cluster, including loss of appetite, weakness in one side of the body, and change in bowel habits (Cronbach's α = 0.532); and symptom cluster 3 represented the self-image symptom cluster, including change in appearance, sadness, and distress (Cronbach's α = 0.547). CONCLUSION: This study identified three potential symptom clusters among primary brain tumor patients. Understanding these clusters could well contribute to earlier interventions and improved quality of care.

Dexmedetomidine Prevents Chronic Incisional Pain After Brain Tumor Resection: A Secondary Analysis of the Randomized Control Trial.

BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine was reported to reduce postoperative acute pain after neurosurgery. However, the efficacy of dexmedetomidine for preventing chronic incisional pain is uncertain. METHODS: This article is a secondary analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Eligible patients were randomly allocated to either the dexmedetomidine group or the placebo group. Patients assigned to the dexmedetomidine group were given a 0.6 µg kg -1 dexmedetomidine bolus followed by a 0.4 µg kg -1 h -1 maintenance dose until dural closure; placebo patients were given comparable amounts of normal saline. The primary end point was the incidence of incisional pain at 3 months after craniotomy evaluated by numerical rating scale scores and defined as any score >0. The secondary end points were postoperative acute pain scores, sleep quality, and Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ-2) at 3 months after craniotomy. RESULTS: From January 2021 to December 2021, a total of 252 patients were included in the final analysis: the dexmedetomidine group (n = 128) and the placebo group (n = 124). The incidence of chronic incisional pain was 23.4% (30 of 128) in the dexmedetomidine group versus 42.7% (53 of 124) in the placebo group (risk ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.80; P = .001). The overall severity of chronic incisional pain was mild in both groups. Patients in the dexmedetomidine group had lower acute pain severity on movement than those in the placebo group for the first 3 days after surgery (all adjusted P < .01). Sleep quality did not differ between groups. However, the SF-MPQ-2 total sensory ( P = .01) and neuropathic pain descriptor ( P = .023) scores in the dexmedetomidine group were lower than those in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion reduces the incidence of chronic incisional pain as well as acute pain score after elective brain tumor resections.

Intraoperative mapping and preservation of executive functions in awake craniotomy: a systematic review.

Awake craniotomy (AC) allows intraoperative brain mapping (ioBM) for maximum lesion resection while monitoring and preserving neurological function. Conventionally, language, visuospatial assessment, and motor functions are mapped, while the assessment of executive functions (EF) is uncommon. Impaired EF may lead to occupational, personal, and social limitations, thus, a compromised quality of life. A comprehensive literature search was conducted through Scopus, Medline, and Cochrane Library using a pre-defined search strategy. Articles were selected after duplicate removal, initial screening, and full-text assessment. The demographic details, ioBM techniques, intraoperative tasks, and their assessments, the extent of resection (EOR), post-op EF and neurocognitive status, and feasibility and potential adverse effects of the procedure were reviewed. The correlations of tumor locations with intraoperative EF deficits were also assessed. A total of 13 studies with intraoperative EF assessment of 351 patients were reviewed. Awake-asleep-awake protocol was most commonly used. Most studies performed ioBM using bipolar stimulation, with a frequency of 60 Hz, pulse durations ranging 1-2 ms, and intensity ranging 2-6 mA. Cognitive function was monitored with the Stroop task, spatial-2-back test, line-bisection test, trail-making-task, and digit-span tests. All studies reported similar or better EOR in patients with ioBM for EF. When comparing the neuropsychological outcomes of patients with ioBM of EF to those without it, all studies reported significantly better EF preservation in ioBM groups. Most authors reported EF mapping as a feasible tool to obtain satisfactory outcomes. Adverse effects included intraoperative seizures which were easily controlled. AC with ioBM of EF is a safe, effective, and feasible technique that allows satisfactory EOR and improved neurocognitive outcomes with minimal adverse effects.

Prevalence, characteristics, and risk factors of venous thromboembolism in patients with brain tumor undergoing craniotomy: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Brain tumor patients undergoing craniotomy are significantly associated with the development of venous thromboembolism (VTE), while the contributing factors remains controversial. Our study aimed to investigate the prevalence and risk factors for VTE in postoperational brain tumor patients. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Medline, and Cochrane Library databases from their inception to July 2023. Article selection, data extraction, and study quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. Publication bias was assessed using Egger's and Begg's tests. Stata 15.0 software was used for data analysis. RESULTS: A total of 25 studies were considered, with a total of 49,620 brain tumor individuals. The pooled prevalence of VTE during hospitalization in postoperational brain tumor patients was 9% [95% CI: (0.08, 0.10)]. Moreover, our results demonstrated that patients with VTE were older than those without VTE [mean difference [MD] = 8.14, 95% CI: (4.97, 11.30)]. The following variables were significantly associated with VTE: prior history of VTE [OR = 7.81, 95% CI: (3.62, 16.88)], congestive heart failure [OR = 2.33, 95% CI: (1.08-5.05)], diabetes [OR = 1.87, 95% CI: (1.12-3.10)], hypertension [OR = 1.27, 95% CI: (1.07-1.50)], steroid use [OR = 1.63, 95% CI: (1.41, 1.88)], high white blood cells counts [MD = 0.32, 95% CI: (0.01, 0.63)], and high fibrinogen levels [MD = 0.19, 95% CI: (0.08, 0.30)]. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis identified risk factors for postoperational VTE in patients with brain tumor, which can serve as a theoretical foundation for medical staff to manage and treat VTE. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CRD42023357459.

The relationship between anti-seizures medications and metabolic acidosis in craniotomy operations: is topiramate or zonisamide the cause of metabolic acidosis?

BACKGROUND/AIM: The most commonly prescribed anti-seizures medications (ASMs) for the treatment of epilepsy are currently topiramate, zonisamide, lacosamide, carbamazepine and levetiracetam. The objective of this study was to examine the correlation between preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative metabolic acidosis and the use of ASMs prior to craniotomy operations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study evaluated patients who underwent intracranial surgery with craniotomy under general anaesthesia between May 2020 and April 2023 and used ASMs. The patients were classified into four groups based on the pharmacological mechanisms of action of the ASMs administered before intracranial surgery (Group-I, zonisamide or topiramate; Group-II, lacosamide; Group-III, carbamazepine; Group-IV, levetiracetam). Metabolic acidosis severity was defined based on base excess (BE) levels: mild (-3 to -5), moderate (-5 to -10), and severe (below - 10). The study investigated the correlation between ASMs and the severity of metabolic acidosis in preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative blood gas measurements. RESULTS: Out of 35 patients, 24 patients underwent intracranial surgery and 11 patients underwent epilepsy surgery. There were statistically significant differences in the severity of metabolic acidosis between preoperative (p < 0.001), intraoperative (p < 0.001) and postoperative (p = 0.01) groups. The preoperative mean BE of group-I was - 4.7, which was statistically lower than that of group-III (p = 0.01) and group-IV (p < 0.001). Intraoperatively and postoperatively, group-I had a mean BE of -7.5 and - 3.2, respectively, which was statistically lower than that of groups II (p = 0.007; p = 0.04), III (p = 0.002; p = 0.03), and IV (p < 0.001; p = 0.009). There was no statistically significant difference in BE between groups II, III and IV at all three time points. Group I had the lowest BE at all three time points. Intraoperative bicarbonate was administered to all patients in group I, whereas no intraoperative bicarbonate was required in the other groups. In group I, 50% of patients required postoperative intensive care. CONCLUSION: The use of ASMs in patients undergoing surgery is important in terms of mortality and morbidity. Topirimat and zonisamide are ASMs that can cause preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative metabolic acidosis. Patients receiving topirimat or zonisamide are particularly susceptible to metabolic acidosis. Special care should be taken in the management of anaesthesia in patients receiving these drugs, and monitoring of the perioperative metabolic status is essential.

How often do awake craniotomies in children and adolescents lead to panic and worry?

PURPOSE: Awake craniotomy (AC) is the treatment of choice for the resection of brain tumors within eloquent brain regions for adults, but not much is known about its psychological impact on children and adolescents. Patient immaturity and difficulty in cooperating during surgery could result in psychological sequelae postoperatively, such as anxiety, panic, and worry. METHODS: In this review, we examined eight studies assessing AC performed on patients under 18 years of age (N = 85), noting exclusion criteria, interventions used, and psychological assessments implemented. RESULTS: Initial assessments of cognitive functioning and maturity were conducted primarily to determine patient eligibility for AC instead of an age restriction. No standardized interventions were used to minimize anxiety associated with AC. Interventions ranged from almost nothing specified to exposure to videos of the operating room, hypnosis, repeated meetings with psychologists and speech therapists, extensive meetings with the surgery team, and thorough exposure to the operating room theater. With a few exceptions, there were no standardized pre- and post-AC assessments of psychological sequelae. Qualitative evaluations indicated that most children and adolescents tolerated AC well, but one study indicated detrimental effects on school attendance postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Given that most AC teams have a psychologist, it seems desirable to have pre- and post-AC psychological assessments using standardized measures of anxiety, trauma, and worry, as well as measures tailored to AC, such as time to return to school, worry about MRIs following surgery, and self-assessment of post-surgery functioning. In short, comprehensive psychological assessment of AC patients is clearly needed.

Post-craniotomy leptomeningeal cyst: a new presentation of an old problem.

Leptomeningeal cyst (LMC) is a known complication of pediatric head injury but has not been described following a craniotomy other than for craniosynostosis. We present the case of a 20-month-old boy who underwent craniotomy for a traumatic epidural hematoma. There was an inadvertent tear of the dura which was repaired with a pericranial patch and dural sealant. The patient presented with a progressive surgical site swelling 5 months post-surgery and a CT scan revealed an LMC with elevation of the bone flap. He underwent re-exploration with watertight repair of the dural defect and rigid fixation of the bone flap. This iatrogenic LMC provides an opportunity to compare and confirm the pathogenesis vis a vis the more common spontaneous post-traumatic LMC. Our report highlights the importance of proper dural closure and bone fixation after craniotomy in children whose skulls are still growing.

Efficacy and safety of neuroendoscopy surgery versus craniotomy for supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Neuroendoscopy (NE) surgery emerged as a promising technique for the treatment of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). A previous meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) analyzed the efficacy and safety of NE compared to craniotomy, but NE did not present a significant improvement in functional outcomes. However, a new study provided an opportunity to update the current knowledge. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for RCTs reporting NE evacuation of spontaneous supratentorial ICH compared to craniotomy. The efficacy outcomes of interest were favorable functional outcome, functional disability, hematoma evacuation rate, and residual hematoma volume. The safety outcomes of interest were rebleeding, infection, and mortality. Seven RCTs were included containing 879 patients. The NE approach presented a significantly higher rate of favorable functional outcome compared with craniotomy (RR: 1.42; 95% CI 1.17, 1.73; p < 0.001). The evacuation rate was higher in patients who underwent the NE approach (MD: -8.36; 95% CI -12.66, -4.07; p < 0.001). NE did not show a benefit in improving the mortality rate (RR: 0.81, 95% CI 0.54, 1.22; p = 0.32). NE was associated with more favorable functional outcomes and lower rates of functional disabilities compared to craniotomy. Also, NE was superior regarding evacuation rate, while presenting a reduction in residual hematoma volume. NE might be associated with lower infection rates. Mortality was not improved by NE surgery. Larger, higher-quality randomized studies are needed to adequately evaluate the efficacy and safety of NE compared to craniotomy.

Comparison of diagnostic yields, operative times, and post-operative hemorrhage between twist drill versus burr hole craniotomy approaches for stereotactic needle brain biopsy.

Stereotactic frameless needle brain biopsy is a common neurosurgical procedure performed via twist drill or open burr hole approaches. We aim to compare diagnostic yields and surgical outcomes to delineate the safety and efficacy of both approaches. A retrospective database of all stereotactic needle biopsy procedures performed at a single institution over 30 months was conglomerated. Demographics, medical comorbidities, operative details/complications, immediate post-operative imaging, and pathology were abstracted. Two hundred and twenty-five needle biopsies were identified, of which 165 (73.3%) were open, and 60 (26.7%) were twist drill. Diagnostic pathology yield rates between open (84.8%) and twist drill (93.3%) approaches were similar (p = 0.15), with a median of 4 cores taken in each (p = 0.30). Diagnostic tissue yields with an intra-operative pause for pathology confirmation was 90.4% compared to 79.1% without pause (p = 0.036, OR 2.49). Median operative times for open versus twist drill procedures were 68.0 min (IQR 49-83) versus 35.5 min (IQR 26-54), respectively (Wilcoxon p < 0.001), which remained significant after controlling for awaiting intraoperative pathology using bivariable linear modeling (p < 0.001). Intraoperative bleeding through the needle cannula was noted in 22 patients (9.8%), including eight twist drill (13.3%) and 14 open needles (8.5%). Of 197 cases (87.6%) with post-operative cranial imaging (CT/MRI), 90 (45.7%) demonstrated some degree of post-operative hemorrhage characterized as superficial (n = 10, 11.1%), deep/intralesional (n = 64, 71.1%) bleeding, or both (n = 16, 17.9%). Bleeding rates between open (46.7%) and twist drill (43.3%) approaches were similar (p = 0.78). Post-operative clinical decline or neurological change was noted in 9 patients (4.0%), including one twist drill (1.7%) and eight open needles (4.8%), among which 7 (78%) had deep blood products identified on post-operative imaging. Stereotactic needle biopsy via twist drill approach has similar diagnostic yield rates, asymptomatic bleeding rates, and post-operative complications with significantly shorter operative time and smaller incision size than conventional open burr hole needle biopsy. Using intra-operative frozen histopathology for presumed sufficient diagnostic tissue may improve final pathologic diagnostic rates regardless of approach technique.

Association between elevated preoperative red cell distribution width and mortality after brain tumor craniotomy.

BACKGROUND: Red cell distribution width (RDW) has been recognized as a potential inflammatory biomarker, with elevated levels associated with adverse outcomes in various diseases. However, its role in predicting outcomes after brain tumor craniotomy remains unclear. We aimed to assess whether preoperative RDW influences mortality and postoperative complications in patients undergoing brain tumor craniotomy. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed serum RDW levels in patients undergoing brain tumor craniotomy at West China Hospital. RDW was evaluated in two forms: RDW-CV and RDW-SD, and was categorized into four quartiles for analysis by using logistic regression and multivariate analysis to adjust for confounding. RESULTS: The study encompassed 10,978 patients undergoing brain tumor craniotomy. our analysis revealed no significant difference in 30-day mortality across various RDW-CV levels. However, we observed a dose-response relationship with preoperative RDW-CV levels in assessing long-term mortality risks. Specifically, patients with RDW-CV levels of 12.6-13.2% (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.18), 13.2-13.9% (HR 1.12, 95% CI 1.04-1.26), and > 13.9% (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.18-1.51) exhibited a significantly higher hazard of long-term mortality compared to those with RDW-CV < 12.6%. When preoperative RDW-CV was analyzed as a continuous variable, for each 10% increase in RDW-CV, the adjusted OR of long-term mortality was 1.09 (95% CI 1.05-1.13). we also observed significant associations between preoperative higher RDW-CV levels and certain postoperative complications including acute kidney injury (OR 1.46, 95% CI: 1.10-1.94), pneumonia infection (OR 1.19 95% CI: 1.05-1.36), myocardial infarction (OR 1.32, 95% CI: 1.05-1.66), readmission (OR 1.15, 95% CI: 1.01-1.30), and a prolonged length of hospital stay (OR 1.11, 95% CI: 1.02-1.21). For RDW-SD levels, there was no significant correlation for short-term mortality, long-term mortality, and postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed elevated preoperative RDW-CV is significantly associated with increased long-term mortality and multiple postoperative complications, but no such association is observed with RDW-SD. These findings show the prognostic importance of RDW-CV, reinforcing its potential as a valuable tool for risk stratification in the preoperative evaluation of brain tumor craniotomy patients.

The role of postoperative blood pressure management in early postoperative hemorrhage in awake craniotomy glioma patients.

Postoperative hemorrhage can severely affect the patients' neurological outcome after awake craniotomy. Higher postoperative blood pressure can increase the risk of postoperative hemorrhage. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of postoperative blood pressure and other common radiological and epidemiological features with the incidence of postoperative hemorrhage. In this retrospective analysis, we included patients who underwent awake surgery at our institution. We assessed the blood pressure both intra- and postoperatively as well as the heart rate for the first 12 h. We compared a cohort with postoperative hemorrhage, who required further treatment (surgical revision or intravenous antihypertensive therapy), with a cohort with no postoperative hemorrhage. We included 48 patients with a median age of 39 years. 9 patients (19%) required further treatment due to postoperative hemorrhage, which was surgery in 2 cases and intensive blood pressure measurements in 7 cases. However, with early treatment, no significant difference in Performance scores at follow-up could be found. Patients with postoperative hemorrhage showed significantly higher postoperative systolic blood pressure during the hours 3-12 (p < 0.05) as well as intraoperatively throughout the procedure (p < 0.05). In ROC and Youden Test, a strong impact of systolic blood pressure over 140mmHg during the early postoperative course could be shown. Postoperative hemorrhage is a rare but possible complication in awake surgery glioma patients. To avoid postoperative hemorrhage, treating physicians should aim strictly on systolic blood pressure of under 140mmHg for the postoperative course.

"Apathetic look" is a valuable indicator of intraoperative supplementary motor area syndrome during awake craniotomy.

Resection of a glioma from the dorsomedial frontal lobe, including the supplementary motor area (SMA), can result in postoperative SMA syndrome. SMA syndrome may occur during awake craniotomies. However, it is often difficult to intraoperatively distinguish between motor dysfunction due to pyramidal tract damage from that due to SMA syndrome. Patients with suspected intraoperative SMA syndrome are indifferent to their surroundings, have stiff facial muscles, and maintain a fixed gaze. We defined this condition as "apathetic look." The present study aimed to investigate whether intraoperative "apathetic look" is useful for identifying intraoperative SMA syndrome in patients with glioma close to motor-related areas, including the SMA, during awake craniotomy. This study included 33 consecutive patients with glioma included in the SMA. We excluded patients whose tumors extended to motor-related areas. We also assessed whether intraoperative SMA syndrome occurred in each patient. We evaluated the correlation between the occurrence of intraoperative SMA syndrome and various clinical factors, including intraoperative "apathetic look." Of the 33 patients, 12 had intraoperative SMA syndrome. Intraoperative "apathetic look" showed strong correlation with intraoperative SMA syndrome (p < 0.0001). Additionally, higher extent of resection (EOR) and resection of the corpus callosum showed a significantly higher incidence of intraoperative "apathetic look." All 12 patients with intraoperative SMA syndrome showed intraoperative "apathetic look" and recovered from SMA syndrome with high EOR. In conclusion, intraoperative "apathetic look" shows strong correlation with intraoperative SMA syndrome. Therefore, "apathetic look" may be a valuable indicator of intraoperative SMA syndrome during awake craniotomy.

Clinical outcomes and complications of eyelid versus eyebrow approaches to supraorbital craniotomy: systematic review and indirect meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Eyebrow supraorbital craniotomy is a versatile keyhole technique for treating intracranial pathologies. The eyelid supraorbital approach, an alternative approach to an eyebrow supraorbital craniotomy, has not been widely adopted among most neurosurgeons. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to perform a pooled analysis of the complications of eyebrow or eyelid approaches for the treatment of aneurysms, meningiomas, and orbital tumors. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Review databases was conducted for identifying relevant literature using keywords such as "supraorbital," "eyelid," "eyebrow," "tumor," and "aneurysm." Eyebrow supraorbital craniotomies with or without orbitotomies and eyelid supraorbital craniotomies with orbitotomies for the treatment of orbital tumors, intracranial meningiomas, and aneurysms were selected. The primary outcomes were overall complications, cosmetic complications, and residual aneurysms and tumors. Secondary outcomes included five complication domains: orbital, wound-related, scalp or facial, neurological, and other complications. RESULTS: One hundred three articles were included in the synthesis. The pooled numbers of patients in the eyebrow and eyelid groups were 4689 and 358, respectively. No differences were found in overall complications or cosmetic complications between the eyebrow and eyelid groups. The proportion of residuals in the eyelid group (11.21%, effect size [ES] 0.26, 95% CI 0.12-0.41) was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that in the eyebrow group (6.17%, ES 0.10, 95% CI 0.08-0.13). A subgroup analysis demonstrated significantly higher incidences of orbital, wound-related, and scalp or facial complications in the eyelid group (p < 0.05), but higher other complications in the eyebrow group. Performing an orbitotomy substantially increased the complication risk. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first meta-analysis that quantitatively compared complications of eyebrow versus eyelid approaches to supraorbital craniotomy. This study found similar overall complication rates but higher rates of selected complication domains in the eyelid group. The literature is limited by a high degree of variability in the reported outcomes.

An update on tests used for intraoperative monitoring of cognition during awake craniotomy.

PURPOSE: Mapping higher-order cognitive functions during awake brain surgery is important for cognitive preservation which is related to postoperative quality of life. A systematic review from 2018 about neuropsychological tests used during awake craniotomy made clear that until 2017 language was most often monitored and that the other cognitive domains were underexposed (Ruis, J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 40(10):1081-1104, 218). The field of awake craniotomy and cognitive monitoring is however developing rapidly. The aim of the current review is therefore, to investigate whether there is a change in the field towards incorporation of new tests and more complete mapping of (higher-order) cognitive functions. METHODS: We replicated the systematic search of the study from 2018 in PubMed and Embase from February 2017 to November 2023, yielding 5130 potentially relevant articles. We used the artificial machine learning tool ASReview for screening and included 272 papers that gave a detailed description of the neuropsychological tests used during awake craniotomy. RESULTS: Comparable to the previous study of 2018, the majority of studies (90.4%) reported tests for assessing language functions (Ruis, J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 40(10):1081-1104, 218). Nevertheless, an increasing number of studies now also describe tests for monitoring visuospatial functions, social cognition, and executive functions. CONCLUSIONS: Language remains the most extensively tested cognitive domain. However, a broader range of tests are now implemented during awake craniotomy and there are (new developed) tests which received more attention. The rapid development in the field is reflected in the included studies in this review. Nevertheless, for some cognitive domains (e.g., executive functions and memory), there is still a need for developing tests that can be used during awake surgery.

Cranial stair-step incision for minimizing postoperative complications in neuro-oncologic surgery: A propensity score-matched analysis.

PURPOSE: Craniotomies for tumor resection can at times result in wound complications which can be devastating in the treatment of neuro-oncological patients. A cranial stair-step technique was recently introduced as an approach to mitigate these complications, especially in this patient population who often exhibit additional risk factors including steroids, chemoradiation, and VEGF inhibitor treatments. This study evaluates our cranial stair-step approach by comparing its postoperative complications using propensity score matching with those of a standard craniotomy wound closure. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients with intracranial neoplasms undergoing primary craniotomy at a single institution. Patients with prior craniotomies and less than three months of follow-up were excluded. Analyses were performed using R Studio. RESULTS: 383 patients were included in the study, 139 of whom underwent the stair-step technique while the rest underwent traditional craniotomy closures. The stair-step cohort was older, had higher ASA classes, and had a higher prevalence of coronary artery disease. The stair-step patients were administered fewer steroids before (40.29% vs. 56.56%, p < 0.01) and after surgery (87.05% vs. 94.26%, p = 0.02), fewer immunotherapy (12.95% vs. 20.90%, p = 0.05), but they received more radiation preoperatively (15.11% vs. 8.61%, p = 0.05). They also underwent fewer operations for recurrences and residuals (0.72% vs. 10.66%, p = 0.01). On propensity score matching, we found 111 matched pairs with no differences except follow-up duration (p < 0.01). The stair-step group had fewer soft tissue infections (0% vs. 3.60%, p = 0.04), fewer total wound complications (0% vs. 4.50%, p = 0.02), was operated on less for these complications (0% vs. 3.60%, p = 0.04), and had a shorter length of stay (6 vs. 9 days, p < 0.01). Notably, the average time to wound complication in our cohort was 44 days, well within our exclusion criteria and follow-up duration. CONCLUSION: The cranial stair-step technique is safe and effective in reducing rates of wound complications and reoperation for neuro-oncologic patients requiring craniotomy.

Effect of different positive end expiratory pressure levels on optic nerve sheath diameter in patients with or without midline shift who are undergoing supratentorial craniotomy.

PURPOSE: In general, high levels of PEEP application is avoided in patients undergoing craniotomy to prevent a rise in ICP. But that approach would increase the risk of secondary brain injury especially in hypoxemic patients. Because the optic nerve sheath is distensible, a rise in ICP is associated with an increase in the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD). The cutoff value for elevated ICP assessed by ONSD is between 5.6 and 6.3 mm. We aimed to evaluate the effect of different PEEP levels on ONSD and compare the effect of different PEEP levels in patients with and without intracranial midline shift. METHODS: This prospective observational study was performed in aged 18-70 years, ASA I-III, 80 patients who were undergoing supratentorial craniotomy. After the induction of general anesthesia, the ONSD's were measured by the linear transducer from 3 mm below the globe at PEEP values of 0-5-10 cmH2O. The ONSD were compered between patients with (n = 7) and without midline shift (n = 73) at different PEEP values. RESULTS: The increases in ONSD due to increase in PEEP level were determined (p < 0.001). No difference was found in the comparison of ONSD between patients with and without midline shift in different PEEP values (p = 0.329, 0.535, 0.410 respectively). But application of 10 cmH2O PEEP in patients with a midline shift increased the mean ONSD value to 5.73 mm. This value is roughly 0.1 mm higher than the lower limit of the ONSD cutoff value. CONCLUSIONS: The ONSD in adults undergoing supratentorial tumor craniotomy, PEEP values up to 5 cmH2O, appears not to be associated with an ICP increase; however, the ONSD exceeded the cutoff for increased ICP when a PEEP of 10 cmH2O was applied in patients with midline shift.

Effectiveness and safety of Tachosil® as a ventricular sealant: an observational cohort study.

PURPOSE: Surgery close to or in contact with the ventricular system is challenging due to the complications. We sought to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of TachoSil® as a ventricular sealant in preventing complications after cranial surgery with an open ventricular system (OVS). METHODS: This is a single-center and prospective cohort study We included patients who underwent elective surgery for supratentorial craniotomy and periventricular pathology between December 2020 and November 2023. We registered surgical complications arising from CSF dynamics (such as percutaneous cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage, hydrocephalus, pseudomeningocele), infections, and other complications (postsurgical hematoma) adverse drug reactions (ADRs), reintervention or hospital readmission up to 90 days after surgery. RESULTS: Forty interventions were performed on 39 patients, whose median age was 56 years. Eleven patients (28.2%) had antecedents of previous surgery in the same location, 5 (12.8%) had previously received radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and 11 (28.2%) were smokers. Twenty-four patients (60%) underwent surgery for high-grade glioma, 8 (20%) for low-grade gliomas, 6 (15%) for metastasis and 2 (5%) for meningioma. Throughout the study and up to 90 days after surgery, none of the patients presented an ADR. Only 2 patients (5%) presented with a surgery complications derived from ventricular opening (one patient with a percutaneous CSF leakage and one patients with external hydrocephalus). Both patients resolved with a ventriculoperitoneal shunt. CONCLUSIONS: TachoSil® is a dural sealant that can be used safely and effectively intraparenchymally in patients whose surgery involves a ventricular opening. Only 5% of treated patients presented complications arising from CSF hydrodynamics. No patients had pseudomeningocele, infections or complications related to the use of this sealant. To confirm these positive results, randomized and comparative clinical trials assessing the efficacy of TachoSil® in patients after cranial surgery with an OVS are essential. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER AND DATE OF REGISTRATION: This study was registered in the Clinical Trials.gov (NCT05717335). Date May 1st, 2022.