RESUMEN
Cancer care delivery is being shaped by growing numbers of cancer survivors coupled with provider shortages, rising costs of primary treatment and follow-up care, significant survivorship health disparities, increased reliance on informal caregivers, and the transition to value-based care. These factors create a compelling need to provide coordinated, comprehensive, personalized care for cancer survivors in ways that meet survivors' and caregivers' unique needs while minimizing the impact of provider shortages and controlling costs for health care systems, survivors, and families. The authors reviewed research identifying and addressing the needs of cancer survivors and caregivers and used this synthesis to create a set of critical priorities for care delivery, research, education, and policy to equitably improve survivor outcomes and support caregivers. Efforts are needed in 3 priority areas: 1) implementing routine assessment of survivors' needs and functioning and caregivers' needs; 2) facilitating personalized, tailored, information and referrals from diagnosis onward for both survivors and caregivers, shifting services from point of care to point of need wherever possible; and 3) disseminating and supporting the implementation of new care methods and interventions.
Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer , Cuidadores , Política de Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Investigación Biomédica/métodos , Investigación Biomédica/organización & administración , Supervivientes de Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Preescolar , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/métodos , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/organización & administración , Femenino , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Área sin Atención Médica , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Necesidades , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/métodos , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/organización & administración , Derivación y Consulta/organización & administración , Apoyo Social , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The burdens of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic have fallen disproportionately on disadvantaged groups, including the poor and Black, Latinx, and Indigenous communities. There is substantial concern that the use of existing ICU triage protocols to allocate scarce ventilators and critical care resources-most of which are designed to save as many lives as possible-may compound these inequities. As governments and health systems revisit their triage guidelines in the context of impending resource shortages, scholars have advocated a range of alternative allocation strategies, including the use of a random lottery to give all patients in need an equal chance of ICU treatment. However, both the save-the-most-lives approach and random allocation are seriously flawed. In this Perspective, we argue that ICU triage policies should simultaneously promote population health outcomes and mitigate health inequities. These ethical goals are sometimes in conflict, which will require balancing the goals of maximizing the number of lives saved and distributing health benefits equitably across society. We recommend three strategies to mitigate health inequities during ICU triage: introducing a correction factor into patients' triage scores to reduce the impact of baseline structural inequities; giving heightened priority to individuals in essential, high-risk occupations; and rejecting use of longer-term life expectancy and categorical exclusions as allocation criteria. We present a practical triage framework that incorporates these strategies and attends to the twin public health goals of promoting population health and social justice.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/terapia , Cuidados Críticos/organización & administración , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Triaje/organización & administración , Poblaciones Vulnerables/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: PAD increases the risk of cardiovascular mortality and limb loss, and disparities in treatment and outcomes have been described. However, the association of patient-specific characteristics with variation in outcomes is less well known. METHODS: Patients with PAD from Duke University Health System (DUHS) between January 1, 2015 and March 31, 2016 were identified. PAD status was confirmed through ground truth adjudication and predictive modeling using diagnosis codes, procedure codes, and other administrative data. Symptom severity, lower extremity imaging, and ankle-brachial index (ABI) were manually abstracted from the electronic health record (EHR). Data was linked to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data to provide longitudinal follow up. Primary outcome was major adverse vascular events (MAVE), a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, lower extremity revascularization and amputation. RESULTS: Of 1,768 patients with PAD, 31.6% were asymptomatic, 41.2% had intermittent claudication (IC), and 27.3% had chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). At 1 year, patients with CLTI had higher rates of MAVE compared with asymptomatic or IC patients. CLTI and Medicaid dual eligibility were independent predictors of mortality. CLTI and Black race were associated with amputation. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of MAVE were highest in patients with CLTI, but patients with IC or asymptomatic disease also had high rates of adverse events. Black and Medicaid dual-eligible patients were disproportionately present in the CLTI subgroup and were at higher risk of amputation and mortality, respectively. Future studies must focus on early identification of high-risk patient groups to improve outcomes in patients with PAD.
Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Extremidad Inferior , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , Enfermedades Asintomáticas/epidemiología , Población Negra/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Extremidad Inferior/cirugía , Masculino , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/complicaciones , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Spatial inequalities in cancer management have been evidenced by studies reporting lower quality of care or/and lower survival for patients living in remote or socially deprived areas. NETSARC+ is a national reference network implemented to improve the outcome of sarcoma patients in France since 2010, providing remote access to specialized diagnosis and Multidisciplinary Tumour Board (MTB). The IGéAS research program aims to assess the potential of this innovative organization, with remote management of cancers including rare tumours, to go through geographical barriers usually impeding the optimal management of cancer patients. METHODS: Using the nationwide NETSARC+ databases, the individual, clinical and geographical determinants of the access to sarcoma-specialized diagnosis and MTB were analysed. The IGéAS cohort (n = 20,590) includes all patients living in France with first sarcoma diagnosis between 2011 and 2014. Early access was defined as specialised review performed before 30 days of sampling and as first sarcoma MTB discussion performed before the first surgery. RESULTS: Some clinical populations are at highest risk of initial management without access to sarcoma specialized services, such as patients with non-GIST visceral sarcoma for diagnosis [OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.78 to 2.15] and MTB discussion [OR 3.56, 95% CI 3.16 to 4.01]. Social deprivation of the municipality is not associated with early access on NETSARC+ remote services. The quintile of patients furthest away from reference centres have lower chances of early access to specialized diagnosis [OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.31] and MTB discussion [OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.40] but this influence of the distance is slight in comparison with clinical factors and previous studies on the access to cancer-specialized facilities. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of national organization driven by reference network, distance to reference centres slightly alters the early access to sarcoma specialized services and social deprivation has no impact on it. The reference networks' organization, designed to improve the access to specialized services and the quality of cancer management, can be considered as an interesting device to reduce social and spatial inequalities in cancer management. The potential of this organization must be confirmed by further studies, including survival analysis.
Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Oncología Médica/estadística & datos numéricos , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Consulta Remota/estadística & datos numéricos , Sarcoma/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Francia , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Oncología Médica/organización & administración , Persona de Mediana Edad , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Consulta Remota/organización & administración , Sarcoma/diagnóstico , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: To identify geographic and socioeconomic variables predictive of residential proximity to retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) clinical trial locations. METHODS: This cross-sectional epidemiological study used census tract-level data from three national public data sets and trial-level data from ClinicalTrials.gov. Socioeconomic predictors of driving distance and time to the nearest ROP clinical trial location were identified. Primary outcomes were time >60 minutes and distance >60 miles traveled to the nearest ROP clinical trial site. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed that residents were more likely to travel >60 minutes to the nearest ROP clinical trial site if they lived in census tracts that were rural (adjusted odds ratio 1.20, P = 0.0002), had higher percentages of the population living ≤ federal poverty level (fourth quartile vs. first quartile, adjusted odds ratio 1.19, P < 0.0001), or had less education (associate vs. bachelor's degree, adjusted odds ratio 1.01, P <0.007). By contrast, counties with higher percentages of births with birth weight <1500 g (adjusted odds ratio 0.88, P = 0.0062) were less likely to travel >60 minutes. Similar variables predicted travel distance. CONCLUSION: Although counties with higher incidences of very low-birth-weight infants were closer to ROP clinical trial sites, residents living in rural and low-income census tracts had significantly greater travel burdens.
Asunto(s)
Tramo Censal , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Retinopatía de la Prematuridad/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Morbilidad/tendencias , Retinopatía de la Prematuridad/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Background: Disadvantaged populations in the United States experience disparities in the use of preventive health services. Purpose: To examine effects of barriers that create health disparities in 10 recommended preventive services for adults, and to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions to reduce them. Data Sources: English-language searches of Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO, SocINDEX, and the Veterans Affairs Health Services database (1 January 1996 to 5 July 2019); reference lists. Study Selection: Trials, observational studies with comparison groups, and systematic reviews of populations adversely affected by disparities that reported effects of barriers on use of any of the 10 selected preventive services or that reported the effectiveness of interventions to reduce disparities in use of a preventive service by improving intermediate or clinical outcomes. Data Extraction: Dual extraction and assessment of study quality, strength of evidence, and evidence applicability. Data Synthesis: No studies reported effects of provider-specific barriers on preventive service use. Eighteen studies reporting effects of patient barriers, such as insurance coverage or lack of a regular provider, on preventive service use had mixed and inconclusive findings. Studies of patient-provider interventions (n = 12), health information technologies (n = 11), and health system interventions (n = 88) indicated higher cancer screening rates with patient navigation; telephone calls, prompts, and other outreach methods; reminders involving lay health workers; patient education; risk assessment, counseling, and decision aids; screening checklists; community engagement; and provider training. Single studies showed that clinician-delivered and technology-assisted interventions improved rates of smoking cessation and weight loss, respectively. Limitation: Insufficient or low strength of evidence and applicability for most interventions except patient navigation, telephone calls and prompts, and reminders involving lay health workers. Conclusion: In populations adversely affected by disparities, patient navigation, telephone calls and prompts, and reminders involving lay health workers increase cancer screening. Primary Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Office of Disease Prevention through an interagency agreement with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (PROSPERO: CRD42018109263).
Asunto(s)
Equidad en Salud , Servicios Preventivos de Salud , Adulto , Educación , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Servicios Preventivos de Salud/organización & administración , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Expert groups, including the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), recommend a range of clinical preventive services for persons at average risk for disease. Use of these services often is substantially lower among racial and ethnic minority groups, rural residents, and persons of lower socioeconomic status. On 19 and 20 June 2019, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) convened the Pathways to Prevention Workshop: Achieving Health Equity in Preventive Services to assess the available evidence on disparities in the use of 10 USPSTF-recommended clinical preventive services for cancer, heart disease, and diabetes. The workshop was cosponsored by the NIH Office of Disease Prevention; National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities; National Cancer Institute; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; and National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. A multidisciplinary working group developed the agenda, and an Evidence-based Practice Center prepared the evidence report. During the workshop, invited experts considered the evidence, with discussion among attendees. After weighing evidence from the review, presentations, and public comments, an independent panel prepared a draft report that was posted for public comment. This final report summarizes the panel's findings, identifying current gaps in knowledge. The panel made 26 recommendations for new research and methods development to improve implementation of proven services to reduce disparities in preventable conditions.
Asunto(s)
Equidad en Salud , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Servicios Preventivos de Salud/organización & administración , Adulto , Educación , Equidad en Salud/organización & administración , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Racial minorities in the United States have reported experiencing widespread racism throughout all aspects of life, from housing to education to employment. Existing research has examined the role of racism, discrimination, and violence in one's interaction with the health care system and their association with poorer mental and physical health. Systemic racism that underlies the fabric of society often manifests itself in prominent institutions, such as law enforcement agencies, regardless of individual intent. Overt and covert racist laws and policies, personal implicit biases, and other factors result in Black individuals and other people of color being the subject of law enforcement violence and criminal justice system interactions at disproportionately high rates. The demonstrated association between discriminatory law enforcement practices and violence and personal and community health necessitates treating these issues as public health issues worthy of a public policy intervention. Addressing some of the sources of institutional racism and harm through transparency and accountability measures is the first of many steps required to begin correcting historical racial injustices.
Asunto(s)
Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Política Organizacional , Racismo , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/normas , Humanos , Racismo/prevención & control , Racismo/estadística & datos numéricos , Sociedades Médicas , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Telehealth plays a role in the continuum of care, especially for older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our objective was to examine factors associated with the accessibility of telehealth services during the COVID-19 pandemic among older adults. METHODS: We analyzed the nationally representative Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey COVID-19 Rapid Response Supplement Questionnaire of beneficiaries aged 65 years or older. Two weighted multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine associations between usual providers who offered telehealth 1) during the COVID-19 pandemic and 2) to replace a regularly scheduled appointment. We examined factors including sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, and digital access and literacy. RESULTS: Of the beneficiaries (n = 6,172, weighted n = 32.4 million), 81.2% reported that their usual providers offered telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Among those offered telehealth services, 56.8% reported that their usual providers offered telehealth to replace a regularly scheduled appointment. Disparities in accessibility of telehealth services by sex, residing area (metropolitan vs nonmetropolitan), income level, and US Census region were observed. Beneficiaries who reported having internet access (vs no access) (OR, 1.75, P < .001) and who reported ever having participated in video, voice, or conference calls over the internet before (vs not) (OR, 2.18, P < .001) were more likely to report having access to telehealth. Non-Hispanic Black beneficiaries (versus White) (OR, 1.57, P = .007) and beneficiaries with comorbidities (vs none) (eg, 2 or 3 comorbidities, OR, 1.25, 95% P = .044) were more likely to have their usual provider offer telehealth to replace a regularly scheduled appointment. CONCLUSION: Although accessibility of telehealth has increased, inequities raise concern. Educational outreach and training, such as installing and launching an online web conferencing platform, should be considered for improving accessibility of telehealth to vulnerable populations beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Telemedicina , Anciano , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Comorbilidad , Estudios Transversales , Demografía , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/normas , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Acceso a Internet/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Evaluación de Necesidades , SARS-CoV-2 , Factores Socioeconómicos , Telemedicina/métodos , Telemedicina/organización & administración , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
To meet the growing demands in the US healthcare system caused by multiculturalism and the expansion of health inequities, due diligence must be given to testing the efficacy of tools used in teaching nurses to provide culturally competent care. This project assessed the utility of a free US government-developed training module. The team found an improved trend in nurse-patient communication scores and improved willingness to ask for help with cultural issues for the intervention unit. The use of no-cost, publicly available resources may be a cost-effective option for training materials.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Cultural/educación , Asistencia Sanitaria Culturalmente Competente/organización & administración , Personal de Salud/educación , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Competencia Cultural/organización & administración , Diversidad Cultural , Asistencia Sanitaria Culturalmente Competente/economía , Personal de Salud/economía , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/economía , HumanosRESUMEN
The use of telemedicine has grown immensely during the COVID-19 pandemic. Telemedicine provides a means to deliver clinical care while limiting patient and provider exposure to the COVID-19. As such, telemedicine is finding applications in a variety of clinical environments including primary care and the acute care setting and the array of patient populations who use telemedicine continues to grow. Yet as telehealth becomes ubiquitous, it is critical to consider its potential to exacerbate disparities in care. Challenges accessing technology and digital literacy, for example, disproportionately impact older patients and those living in poverty. When implemented with the consideration of health disparities, telemedicine provides an opportunity to address these inequities. This manuscript explores potential mechanisms by which telemedicine may play a role in exacerbating or ameliorating disparities in care. We further describe a framework and suggested strategies with which to implement telemedicine systems to improve health equity.
Asunto(s)
Brecha Digital , Equidad en Salud/organización & administración , Telemedicina/organización & administración , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/terapia , Equidad en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: A spreadsheet-based model for supporting equitable mental health resource distribution in Australia was developed, based on the Australian Health Survey (AHS) psychological distress findings associated with area socio-economic disadvantage (SED). An illustrative application is presented. METHOD: Stratum-specific psychological-distress rates for area SED quintiles are applied to local government areas, catchment areas and local health networks (LHNs). A case study applies the model to Victoria, including examining recommendations in the Royal Commission into Victoria's Mental Health Services (RCVMHS) 2019 interim report for increases to bed stock in two LHNs. RESULTS: Need-adjusted demand estimates considered as a ratio of raw population proportions for catchments range between 0.6 to 1.4 in Victoria. Applying the formula to the Royal Commission recommendations suggests the proposed distribution of beds is a reasonable correction for these two LHNs and indicates next expansion priorities for more equitable distribution to other LHNs. CONCLUSIONS: The spreadsheet, adaptable for other states and territories, could complement National Mental Health Services Planning Framework outputs and assist in evaluation, for instance, determining potential supply shortages in the tele-mental-health response to COVID-19. We outline research directions including consideration of the moral bases of value judgements and identification of other variables including their use in parameterisation and calibration.
Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Servicios de Salud Mental/provisión & distribución , Áreas de Pobreza , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud , Estrés Psicológico , Poblaciones Vulnerables/psicología , Adulto , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Modelos Organizacionales , Clase Social , Justicia Social , Estrés Psicológico/economía , Estrés Psicológico/epidemiología , Estrés Psicológico/etiología , Estrés Psicológico/terapia , VictoriaRESUMEN
The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated an immediate response and rapid transition from traditional face-to-face behavioral health services to behavioral telehealth at an organization serving sexual and gender diverse (SGD) individuals in Chicago. In this practice innovations article, we explore the unfolding public health crisis and the impact on service delivery for SGD individuals. Using a large multi-service organization as a case study, this paper describes how key members of the staff and leadership team shifted services online as a means of responding to isolation, loneliness, and disparities in access to healthcare for Chicago SGD communities. Lessons learned and practice recommendations are presented.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Servicios de Salud Mental/organización & administración , Minorías Sexuales y de Género , Telemedicina/organización & administración , Chicago/epidemiología , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
Restrictive gender norms and gender inequalities are replicated and reinforced in health systems, contributing to gender inequalities in health. In this Series paper, we explore how to address all three through recognition and then with disruptive solutions. We used intersectional feminist theory to guide our systematic reviews, qualitative case studies based on lived experiences, and quantitative analyses based on cross-sectional and evaluation research. We found that health systems reinforce patients' traditional gender roles and neglect gender inequalities in health, health system models and clinic-based programmes are rarely gender responsive, and women have less authority as health workers than men and are often devalued and abused. With regard to potential for disruption, we found that gender equality policies are associated with greater representation of female physicians, which in turn is associated with better health outcomes, but that gender parity is insufficient to achieve gender equality. We found that institutional support and respect of nurses improves quality of care, and that women's empowerment collectives can increase health-care access and provider responsiveness. We see promise from social movements in supporting women's reproductive rights and policies. Our findings suggest we must view gender as a fundamental factor that predetermines and shapes health systems and outcomes. Without addressing the role of restrictive gender norms and gender inequalities within and outside health systems, we will not reach our collective ambitions of universal health coverage and the Sustainable Development Goals. We propose action to systematically identify and address restrictive gender norms and gender inequalities in health systems.
Asunto(s)
Salud Global/legislación & jurisprudencia , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Sexismo/prevención & control , Femenino , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Masculino , Rol de la Enfermera , Salud Laboral/legislación & jurisprudencia , Sexismo/legislación & jurisprudenciaRESUMEN
The Sustainable Development Goals offer the global health community a strategic opportunity to promote human rights, advance gender equality, and achieve health for all. The inability of the health sector to accelerate progress on a range of health outcomes brings into sharp focus the substantial impact of gender inequalities and restrictive gender norms on health risks and behaviours. In this paper, the fifth in a Series on gender equality, norms, and health, we draw on evidence to dispel three myths on gender and health and describe persistent barriers to progress. We propose an agenda for action to reduce gender inequality and shift gender norms for improved health outcomes, calling on leaders in national governments, global health institutions, civil society organisations, academic settings, and the corporate sector to focus on health outcomes and engage actors across sectors to achieve them; reform the workplace and workforce to be more gender-equitable; fill gaps in data and eliminate gender bias in research; fund civil-society actors and social movements; and strengthen accountability mechanisms.
Asunto(s)
Salud Global/legislación & jurisprudencia , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Sexismo/prevención & control , Femenino , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Masculino , Salud Laboral/legislación & jurisprudencia , Salud Pública , Sexismo/legislación & jurisprudenciaRESUMEN
Significant challenges need to be overcome to ensure eventual COVID-19 vaccines get to everyone who needs them. Andréia Azevedo Soares reports.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19/provisión & distribución , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Brasil , Países en Desarrollo , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: National changes in health care disparities within the setting of trauma care have not been examined within Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) or non-ACOs. We sought to examine the impact of ACOs on post-treatment outcomes (in-hospital mortality, 90-day complications, and readmissions), as well as surgical intervention among whites and nonwhites treated for spinal fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified all beneficiaries treated for spinal fractures between 2009 and 2014 using national Medicare fee for service claims data. Claims were used to identify sociodemographic and clinical criteria, receipt of surgery and in-hospital mortality, 90-day complications, and readmissions. Multivariable logistic regression analysis accounting for all confounders was used to determine the effect of race/ethnicity on outcomes. Nonwhites were compared with whites treated in non-ACOs between 2009 and 2011 as the referent. RESULTS: We identified 245,704 patients who were treated for spinal fractures. Two percent of the cohort received care in an ACO, whereas 7% were nonwhite. We found that disparities in the use of surgical fixation for spinal fractures were present in non-ACOs over the period 2009-2014 but did not exist in the context of care provided through ACOs (odds ratio [OR] 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44, 1.28). A disparity in the development of complications existed for nonwhites in non-ACOs (OR 1.09; 95% CI 1.01, 1.17) that was not encountered among nonwhites receiving care in ACOs (OR 1.32; 95% CI 0.90, 1.95). An existing disparity in readmission rates for nonwhites in ACOs over 2009-2011 (OR 1.34; 95% CI 1.01, 1.80) was eliminated in the period 2012-2014 (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.65, 1.09). CONCLUSIONS: Our work reinforces the idea that ACOs could improve health care disparities among nonwhites. There is also the potential that as ACOs become more familiar with care integration and streamlined delivery of services, further improvements in disparities could be realized.
Asunto(s)
Organizaciones Responsables por la Atención/estadística & datos numéricos , Fijación de Fractura/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Organizaciones Responsables por la Atención/economía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ahorro de Costo/economía , Ahorro de Costo/estadística & datos numéricos , Etnicidad , Femenino , Fijación de Fractura/efectos adversos , Fijación de Fractura/economía , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare/economía , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/economía , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Health technology assessment (HTA) plays an important role in reimbursement decision-making in many countries, but recommendations vary widely throughout jurisdictions, even for the same drug. This variation may be due to differences in the weighing of evidence or differences in the processes or procedures, which are known as HTA practices. OBJECTIVE: To provide insight into the effects of differences in practices on interpretation of intercountry differences in HTA recommendations for conditionally approved drugs. METHODS: HTA recommendations for conditionally approved drugs (N = 27) up until June 2017 from England/Wales, France, Germany, the Netherlands, and Scotland were included. Recommendations and practice characteristics were extracted from these five jurisdictions and this data was validated. The effect of nonsubmissions, resubmissions, and reassessments; cost-effectiveness assessments; and price negotiations on changes in the percentage of negative recommendations and the interpretation of intercountry differences in HTA outcomes were analyzed using Fisher exact tests. RESULTS: The inclusion of cost-effectiveness assessments led to significant increases in the proportion of negative recommendations in England/Wales (from 4% to 50%, P<.01) and Scotland (from 21% to 71%, P<.01). The subsequent inclusion of price negotiations led to significant reductions in the proportion of negative recommendations in England/Wales (from 50% to 14%, P<.01), France (from 31% to 3%, P=.012), and Germany (from 34% to 0%, P<.01). Results indicated that the inclusion of nonsubmissions and resubmissions might affect Scottish negative HTA recommendations (from 7% to 21%), but this effect was not significant. No significant effects were observed in the Netherlands, possibly owing to sample size. CONCLUSION: Variations in HTA practices between international jurisdictions can have a substantial and significant impact on conclusions about recommendations by HTA bodies, as exemplified in this cohort of conditionally approved products. Studies comparing international HTA recommendations should carefully consider possible practice variations between jurisdictions.
Asunto(s)
Conducta de Elección , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Asignación de Recursos para la Atención de Salud/economía , Política de Salud/economía , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/economía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/economía , Evaluación de la Tecnología Biomédica/economía , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Comparación Transcultural , Tecnología Culturalmente Apropiada/economía , Asistencia Sanitaria Culturalmente Competente/economía , Europa (Continente) , Asignación de Recursos para la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Formulación de Políticas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/organización & administración , Evaluación de la Tecnología Biomédica/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
India is a diverse land with different cultures, social norms, castes, religions, faiths, languages, politics, and a complex healthcare system. As a step to enhance healthcare, the government of India announced a move toward universal health coverage to increase accessibility and affordability of health-related services. Recently, there has been an introduction of health technology assessment (HTA) in India to help inform evidence-based decision making in cases of limited resources and budgets. Nevertheless, there are challenges related to biased decision making, an unregulated healthcare framework, and the lack of data and capacity that will (directly or indirectly) affect the use of HTA in India. For HTA to be successful in India and in similar low- and middle-income countries, it is important that the decision makers acknowledge these challenges and embrace differences in ideologies, cultures, and politics instead of ignoring them. Drawing lessons from countries with well-developed HTA bodies may help, but these need to be modified for the country-specific context. Ensuring quality and transparency is key to building trust in medical decision making. Improved coordination at all levels of healthcare is vital to ensure the long-term success of HTA in India. This is challenging but achievable by spreading awareness among stakeholders and achieving moderate health-sector regulation that can combat corruption. HTA will prosper in India if it incorporates cultural and institutional diversity, alongside tackling socioeconomic inequalities.
Asunto(s)
Conducta de Elección , Asignación de Recursos para la Atención de Salud , Política de Salud , Evaluación de la Tecnología Biomédica , Atención de Salud Universal , Cobertura Universal del Seguro de Salud , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Tecnología Culturalmente Apropiada , Asistencia Sanitaria Culturalmente Competente , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Asignación de Recursos para la Atención de Salud/economía , Asignación de Recursos para la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Política de Salud/economía , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/economía , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , India , Formulación de Políticas , Calidad de Vida , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Valores Sociales , Participación de los Interesados , Evaluación de la Tecnología Biomédica/economía , Evaluación de la Tecnología Biomédica/organización & administración , Cobertura Universal del Seguro de Salud/economía , Cobertura Universal del Seguro de Salud/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
In July 2019, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released data for 2018 that indicated a rise in preterm births (birth at <37 weeks' gestation). This increase marks the fourth consecutive year that the United States has seen an increase in infants born too soon or too small. March of Dimes examined these data for its annual report card, giving the nation a "C" letter grade for this dismal outcome. This rise coincides with an ongoing increase in pregnancy-related death, the rate of which has more than doubled over the last 25 years in the United States. Racial and ethnic minorities suffer inequitably. Women of color are up to 50% more likely to give birth prematurely. Black, American Indian, and Alaska Native women are 2 to 3 times more likely to die from pregnancy-related causes than white women. A new approach is needed to address these crises. That approach must consider a range of population-based systems-level solutions.