Patient Outcomes of Definitive Diverticular Hemorrhage After Colonoscopic, Medical, Surgical, or Embolization Treatment.

BACKGROUND: There are few reports of clinical outcomes or the natural history of definitive diverticular hemorrhage (DDH). AIMS: To describe 1-year clinical outcomes of patients with documented DDH treated with colonoscopic hemostasis, angioembolization, surgery, or medical treatment. METHODS: DDH was diagnosed when active bleeding or other stigmata of hemorrhage were found in a colonic diverticulum during urgent colonoscopy or extravasation on angiography or red blood cell (RBC) scanning. This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of DDH patients from two referral centers between 1993 and 2022. Outcomes were compared for the four treatment groups. The Kaplan-Meier analysis was for time-to-first diverticular rebleed. RESULTS: 162 patients with DDH were stratified based on their final treatment before discharge-104 colonoscopic hemostasis, 24 medical treatment alone, 19 colon surgery, and 15 angioembolization. There were no differences in baseline characteristics, except for a higher Glasgow-Blatchford score in the angioembolization group vs. the colonoscopic group. Post-treatment, the colonoscopic hemostasis group had the lowest rate of RBC transfusions and fewer hospital and ICU days compared to surgical and embolization groups. The medical group had significantly higher rates of rebleeding and reintervention. The surgical group had the highest postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Medically treated DDH patients had significantly higher 1-year rebleed and reintervention rates than the three other treatments. Those with colonoscopic hemostasis had significantly better clinical outcomes during the index hospitalization. Surgery and embolization are recommended as salvage therapies in case of failure of colonoscopic and medical treatments.

Colonoscopic observation time as a predictor of stigmata of recent hemorrhage identification in colonic diverticular hemorrhage.

OBJECTIVES: The strategy of identifying stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH) and treating the bleeding source is important for the prevention of rebleeding in colonic diverticular hemorrhage (CDH). However, there are few known reports on SRH identification thus far. This large multicenter study evaluated factors correlated with SRH identification, including observation time during colonoscopy. METHODS: A total of 392 CDH cases were classified into presumptive CDH (n = 276) or definitive CDH with SRH (n = 116) on the basis of colonoscopy results. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was employed to identify factors correlated with SRH identification. For the endoscopic treatment, endoscopic clips (EC), endoscopic band ligation (EBL) or endoscopic detachable snare ligation (EDSL) was performed. RESULTS: Longer observation time was significantly correlated with SRH identification in multivariate analysis (OR, 10.3 [95% CI: 3.84-27.9], p<.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis of the SRH identification rate by observation time indicated a high area under the curve (AUC) (0.79), and the threshold of the observation time was calculated at 19 min using Youden's index. Moreover, the patients taken endoscopic hemostasis showed significantly lower early rebleeding rate than patients without endoscopic hemostasis (16.4% vs. 31.9%, p=.001), suggesting the importance of identifying SRH and treating the bleeding source for reducing the risk of recurrent bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Long-observation time correlated with SRH identification in this study, in which bowel preparation and water-jet scope and cap attachment are commonly used. This is the first known study to highlight the significance of observation time in the SRH identification rates.

Treatment strategies for reducing early and late recurrence of colonic diverticular bleeding based on stigmata of recent hemorrhage: a large multicenter study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Treatment strategies for colonic diverticular bleeding (CDB) based on stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH) remain unstandardized, and no large studies have evaluated their effectiveness. We sought to identify the best strategy among combinations of SRH identification and endoscopic treatment strategies. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 5823 CDB patients who underwent colonoscopy at 49 hospitals throughout Japan (CODE-BLUE J-Study). Three strategies were compared: find SRH (definitive CDB) and treat endoscopically, find SRH (definitive CDB) and treat conservatively, and without finding SRH (presumptive CDB) treat conservatively. In conducting pairwise comparisons of outcomes in these groups, we used propensity score-matching analysis to balance baseline characteristics between the groups being compared. RESULTS: Both early and late recurrent bleeding rates were significantly lower in patients with definitive CDB treated endoscopically than in those with presumptive CDB treated conservatively (<30 days, 19.6% vs 26.0% [P < .001]; <365 days, 33.7% vs 41.6% [P < .001], respectively). In patients with definitive CDB, the early recurrent bleeding rate was significantly lower in those treated endoscopically than in those treated conservatively (17.4% vs 26.7% [P = .038] for a single test of hypothesis; however, correction for multiple testing of data removed this significance). The late recurrent bleeding rate was also lower, but not significantly, in those treated endoscopically (32.0% vs 36.1%, P = .426). Definitive CDB treated endoscopically showed significantly lower early and late recurrent bleeding rates than when treated conservatively in cases of SRH with active bleeding, nonactive bleeding, and in the right-sided colon but not left-sided colon. CONCLUSIONS: Treating definitive CDB endoscopically was most effective in reducing recurrent bleeding over the short and long term, compared with not treating definitive CDB or presumptive CDB. Physicians should endeavor to find and treat SRH for suspected CDB.

High Cost of Hospitalization for Colonic Diverticular Bleeding Depended on Repeated Bleeding and Blood Transfusion: Analysis with Diagnosis Procedure Combination Data in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Bleeding from a colonic diverticulum is serious in aged patients. The aim of this study was to determine the risk factors for high-cost hospitalization of colonic diverticular bleeding using the diagnosis procedure combination (DPC) data. METHODS: From January 2009 to December 2015, 78 patients with colonic diverticular bleeding were identified by DPC data in Saga Medical School Hospital. All patients underwent colonic endoscopy within 3 days. The patients were divided into 2 groups: the low-cost group (DPC cost of <500,000 yen) and the high-cost group (DPC cost of >500,000 yen). RESULTS: Univariate analysis revealed that aging, hypertension, rebleeding, a low hemoglobin concentration at admission, and blood transfusion were risk factors for high hospitalization cost. Multivariate analysis revealed that rebleeding (OR 5.3; 95% CI 1.3-21.3; p = 0.017) and blood transfusion (OR 3.8; 95% CI 1.01-14.2; p = 0.048) were definite risk factors for high hospitalization cost. CONCLUSION: Rebleeding and blood transfusion were related to high hospitalization cost for colonic diverticular bleeding.

Complicated diverticular disease: Position statement on outpatient management, Hartmann's procedure, laparoscopic peritoneal lavage and laparoscopic approach. Consensus document of the Spanish Association of Coloproctology and the Coloproctology Section of the Spanish Association of Surgeons. / Enfermedad diverticular complicada: toma de posición sobre tratamiento ambulatorio, intervención de Hartmann, lavado-drenaje peritoneal y cirugía laparoscópica. Documento de consenso de la Asociación Española de Coloproctología y Sección de Coloproctología de la Asociación Española de Cirujanos.

The Spanish Association of Coloproctology (AECP) and the Coloproctology Section of the Spanish Association of Surgeons (AEC), propose this consensus document about complicated diverticular disease that could be used for decision-making. Outpatient management, Hartmann's procedure, laparoscopic peritoneal lavage, and the role of a laparoscopic approach in colonic resection are exposed.

Diverticular Disease in the Primary Care Setting.

Diverticular disease is a chronic and common condition, and yet the impact of diverticular disease in primary care is largely unknown. The diagnosis of diverticular disease relies on the demonstration of diverticula in the colon, and the necessary investigations are often not available in primary care. The specificity and sensitivity of symptoms, clinical signs and laboratory tests alone are generally low and consequently the diagnostic process will be characterized by uncertainty. Also, the criteria for symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease in the absence of macroscopic inflammation are not clearly defined. Therefore both the prevalence of diverticular disease and the incidence of diverticulitis in primary care are unknown. Current recommendations for treatment and follow-up of patients with acute diverticulitis are based on studies where the diagnosis has been verified by computerized tomography. The results cannot be directly transferred to primary care where the diagnosis has to rely on the interpretation of symptoms and signs. Therefore, one must allow for greater diagnostic uncertainty, and safety netting in the event of unexpected development of the condition is an important aspect of the management of diverticulitis in primary care. The highest prevalence of diverticular disease is found among older patients, where multimorbidity and polypharmacy is common. The challenge is to remember the possible contribution of diverticular disease to the patient's overall condition and to foresee its implications in terms of advice and treatment in relation to other diseases.

Predictors for identification of stigmata of recent hemorrhage on colonic diverticula in lower gastrointestinal bleeding.

GOALS: The aim of this study was to identify predictors for the identification of stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH) on colonic diverticula. BACKGROUND: Several factors influence the identification of SRH in the diagnosis of colonic diverticular bleeding. STUDY: A total of 396 patients hospitalized for lower gastrointestinal bleeding were analyzed. Comorbidities, medications, timing of colonoscopy [<24 h (h); urgent, 24 to 48 h, >48 h], preparation, expert colonoscopist, use of a cap, use of a water-jet scope, total colonoscopy, and procedure time (over 60 min) were assessed. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to estimate odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Two hundred fifteen patients were diagnosed with colonic diverticular bleeding and 37 (17%) were identified with SRH. Urgent colonoscopy (OR, 8.4; 95% CI, 2.3-30; P<0.01), expert colonoscopist (OR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.2-7.3; P=0.02), use of a cap (OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.4-8.0; P=0.01), and use of water-jet scope (OR, 5.8; 95% CI, 2.3-15; P<0.01) were found to be independent predictive factors for SRH. The accuracy of these factors in combination was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.85-0.96) as measured by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC). SRH identification rate was higher in the urgent (22%) than in the 24 to 48 hours (2.9%, P<0.01) and >48 hours groups (1.0%, P<0.01), showing a tendency to decrease with time (P<0.01 for trend). CONCLUSIONS: Factors of urgent colonoscopy, expert colonoscopist, use of a cap, and use of water-jet scope are useful for identifying SRH diverticula.

Practice parameters for the treatment of colonic diverticular disease: Italian Society of Colon and Rectal Surgery (SICCR) guidelines.

The mission of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR) is to optimize patient care. Providing evidence-based practice guidelines is therefore of key importance. About the present report it concernes the SICCR practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of diverticular disease of the colon. The guidelines are not intended to define the sole standard of care but to provide evidence-based recommendations regarding the available therapeutic options.

Risk factors for early re-bleeding and associated hospitalization in patients with colonic diverticular bleeding.

AIM: The annual incidence of colonic diverticular bleeding is increasing, but treatments are not yet well established. Here we aimed to identify the risk factors for early re-bleeding and to determine the associated duration of hospitalization. METHOD: Records of 90 emergent patients with colonic diverticular bleeding between 1999 and May 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. They were divided into an early re-bleeding within 1 month group (n = 24) and a no re-bleeding group (n = 66) and we investigated the risk factors for early re-bleeding. In the former group, we calculated the time from the first haemostasis to early re-bleeding and the associated duration of hospitalization. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed that there were significantly more patients with signs of shock (P = 0.00055) and active bleeding on the first colonoscopy after admission (P = 0.020) in the early re-bleeding group. Multivariate conditional logistic regression analysis using stepwise variable selection showed that signs of shock on admission (odds ratio, 5.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.84-14.90; P = 0.0019) remained statistically significant. All patients who re-bled without signs of shock (n = 7) and 16 of 17 with signs of shock re-bled within 126 h (5.25 days) of initial hospitalization. CONCLUSION: Shock was an independent risk factor for early re-bleeding. The associated duration of hospitalization was 6 days.

Risk factors for difficult endoscopic hemostasis for colonic diverticular bleeding and efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial embolization.

This study aimed to investigate the risk factors for difficult endoscopic hemostasis in patients with colonic diverticular bleeding and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) for colonic diverticular bleeding. This study included 208 patients with colorectal diverticular hemorrhage. The non-interventional radiotherapy group consisted of patients who underwent successful spontaneous hemostasis (n = 131) or endoscopic hemostasis (n = 56), whereas the interventional radiotherapy group consisted of patients who underwent TAE (n = 21). Patient clinical characteristics were compared to identify independent risk factors for the interventional radiotherapy group. Furthermore, the hemostasis success rate, rebleeding rate, complications, and recurrence-free survival were compared between patients who underwent endoscopic hemostasis and those who underwent TAE. Bleeding from the right colon (odds ratio [OR]: 7.86; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6-38.8; P = .0113) and systolic blood pressure <80 mm Hg (OR: 0.108; 95% CI: 0.0189-0.62; P = .0126) were identified as independent risk factors for the interventional radiology group. The hemostasis success rate (P = 1.00), early rebleeding rate (within 30 days) (P = .736), late rebleeding rate (P = 1.00), and recurrence-free survival rate (P = .717) were not significantly different between the patients who underwent TAE and those who underwent endoscopic hemostasis. Patients in the TAE group experienced more complications than those in the endoscopic hemostasis group (P < .001). Complications included mild intestinal ischemia (19.0%) and perforation requiring surgery (4.8%). Patients who required interventional radiotherapy were more likely to bleed from the right colon and presented with a systolic blood pressure of <80 mm Hg. TAE is an effective treatment for patients with colonic diverticular hemorrhage that is refractory to endoscopic hemostasis. However, complications must be monitored carefully.

Endoscopic band ligation for colonic diverticular hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: The number of sample cases of colonic diverticular hemorrhage treated with endoscopic band ligation (EBL) has been small to date. OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the safety and efficacy of EBL for colonic diverticular hemorrhage. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: General hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 29 patients with 31 colonic diverticula with stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH). INTERVENTIONS: Urgent colonoscopy was performed after bowel preparation. When diverticula with SRH were identified, marking with hemoclips was done near the diverticula. The endoscope was removed and reinserted after a band-ligator device was attached to the tip of endoscope. At first, EBL was attempted. In patients who could not be treated with EBL, epinephrine injection or endoscopic clipping was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Procedure time, rate of hemostasis and rebleeding, complications. RESULTS: The mean procedure time was 47 ± 19 minutes. EBL was successfully completed in 27 colonic diverticula (87%); except in 3 diverticula with a small orifice and large dome and 1 diverticula in which the orifice was too large. Early rebleeding after EBL occurred in 3 of 27 cases (11%). Although 2 cases of sigmoid rebleeding could be managed by repeat EBL or conservatively, right hemicolectomy was performed in 1 ascending diverticulum, in which the bleeding source was not identified on repeat colonoscopy. Scar formation at previously banded diverticula was identified in 7 of 11 patients who underwent follow-up colonoscopy. There were no complications after EBL in any of the patients. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study. CONCLUSIONS: EBL is a safe and effective treatment for colonic diverticular hemorrhage, and colonic diverticula resolve after EBL.

Diagnostic yield of colonoscopy to evaluate melena after a nondiagnostic EGD.

BACKGROUND: Melena can be caused by bleeding from lower GI sources. Colonoscopy is frequently used to investigate melena after a nondiagnostic EGD. OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic yield and rate of therapeutic intervention during colonoscopy in patients with melena and a nondiagnostic EGD. DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. SETTING: Community and academic centers over a diverse geographic area in the United States. PATIENTS: This study involved patients in the Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative database with a colonoscopy performed to investigate melena within 30 days of a nondiagnostic EGD for the same indication. A control group had colonoscopies performed for average-risk screening. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The endoscopic finding of a suspected bleeding source defined as right-sided arteriovenous malformation, colitis, polyp ≥ 20 mm, tumor, or ulcer. Rate of therapeutic intervention during colonoscopy. RESULTS: Colonoscopy found a suspected bleeding source in 4.8% of patients with melena, more frequently than in the control group (odds ratio [OR] 2.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65-2.86; P < .0001). The rate of therapeutic intervention during melena-related colonoscopy was 1.7%. Patients with melena were more likely to have a colon tumor (OR 2.87; 95% CI, 1.82-5.51; P < .0001) than were control patients. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design, conclusions being dependent on the accuracy of database input, and lack of pertinent clinical data (eg, hemoglobin). CONCLUSION: The diagnostic yield of colonoscopy to investigate melena after nondiagnostic EGD is low. The need for therapeutic intervention during colonoscopy for this indication is very low. This population should undergo colonoscopy because they are at increased risk of colorectal cancer. Colonoscopy can potentially be performed electively in stable patients without continued bleeding.

Effectiveness of high-dose barium enema filling for colonic diverticular bleeding.

AIM: Therapeutic barium enema was first reported in 1970. The long-term recurrence rate of colonic diverticular bleeding after therapeutic barium enema was compared with that of endoscopic haemostasis. METHOD: This study included 57 consecutive patients admitted between 2003 and 2008 with colonic diverticular bleeding in whom conservative treatment failed to stop bleeding within 3 h of hospital admission. Lower gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed immediately after admission. In 75% of patients, bleeding was from the right colon, and any identifiable source of bleeding was treated by endoscopic haemostasis. Cases with an undetectable source received high-dose barium impaction therapy. RESULTS: Treatment was as follows: Group A (n = 37) solely by endoscopic haemostasis; Group B (n = 11) solely by therapeutic barium enema group, and Group C (n = 9) by endoscopic haemostasis and therapeutic barium enema. At a follow up of seven (median; range: 1-56) months, recurrent bleeding rates were 18/37 (48.6%), 6/11 (54.5%) and 2/9 (22.2%) (P = 0.3930). CONCLUSION: High-dose barium enema is as effective as endoscopic haemostasis for the prevention of recurrent diverticular bleeding.

Long-term health-related quality of life after minimally invasive surgery for diverticular disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The aim of this multicentric study was to evaluate the disease specific and the generic quality of life in patients affected by colonic diverticular disease (DD) who had undergone minimally invasive or open colonic resection or who had been treated with medical therapy in the long-term follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-one consecutive patients admitted to the departments of surgery of Padova and Arzignano Hospitals for DD were interviewed: 22 underwent minimally invasive colonic resection, 24 had open resection, and 25 had only medical therapy. The interview focused on disease specific and generic quality of life, body image, and disease activity. RESULTS: Padova Inflammatory Bowel Disease Quality of Life (PIBDQL) was validated for the use in DD patients. PIBDQL scores were significantly worse in all patients with DD than those obtained by healthy subjects and it correlated with the symptoms score. The generic quality of life seemed similar in patients who had minimally invasive colonic resection compared with healthy subjects. Body Image Questionnaire scores correlated inversely with the presence of a stoma. CONCLUSIONS: Disease activity resulted as the only independent predictor of the disease-specific quality of life. In fact, DD affected bowel function and quality of life of patients in the long-term follow-up regardless of the type of therapy adopted. The presence of a stoma affected the patients' body image.

[New knowledge on the diverticular disease of colon]. / Nové poznatky v problematice divertikulární choroby tracníku.

The article is a summary paper aimed at new knowledge, concerning the classification, diagnostics, medication and endoscopic treatment of diverticular disease of colon. Briefly mentioned are the issues of functional disorder in the field of diverticulosis--symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease of colon. Diverticular bleeding is explained in terms of its pathogenesis and diagnostics. The problem with estimation the ration of diverticular bleedings in the total number of bleedings into the lower digestive tract is caused by diverse criteria for selecting patients and two levels of diagnostic of diverticular bleeding (definite and presumptive). Attention is paid also to diverticular colitis. Synonyms, endoscopic and histological classification are listed. The main endoscopic findings represent areas of erythema, which are visible on the mucosa between diverticula. Diverticulitis is seen as the most significant complication and the diagnostics of diverticulitis is discussed in detail. The first recommended step in the diagnosis is an urgent abdominal ultrasound; the gold standard is a CT examination of the abdomen, in special situations, some other imaging methods should be used: MRI, colonoscopy. The article ends with an overview of modern therapeutic options in the treatment of diverticular colitis and diverticulitis, particularly the use of antibiotics, probiotics, mesalasine and antispasmodics. Negative effect of NSAIDs on the course of diverticulitis and induction diverticular bleeding is listed.

[Perspectives in the treatment of the diverticular disease of the colon]. / Trattamento della malattia diverticolare del colon. Nuove strategie?

Diverticular disease of the colon shows a progressive increasing incidence. New physiopathological knowledges have clarified the role of several pathogenetic factors in determining the development of the disease. These new informations have permitted new therapeutic approaches. We reviewed the current and novel therapeutic indications in order to treat the symptoms and preventing recurrence.

Inverted colonic diverticulum (ICD): report of two cases and literature review of a not that unusual endoscopic challenge.

Inverted colonic diverticulum (ICD) is a rare intraluminal lesion occurring in about 0.7-1.7% of people, often endoscopically indistinguishable from polyps. Some unspecific endoscopic features may assist to distinguish polypoid ICD from true polyps. This differentiation bears relevance for the therapeutic approach, as colonic polyps require snare polypectomy, a practice which may be associated with colonic perforation in case of true ICD. The endoscopist, therefore, should be aware of the likelihood of detecting these lesions during colonoscopy. A close inspection and a gentle probing could assist in a correct diagnosis and avoid risky procedures such as biopsy or polypectomy. Rarely, a neoplasm arising over an ICD and its treatment has been described. We reported two cases, one of which with dysplasia, and their treatment, and reviewed all the ICD endoscopic cases so far reported in the literature, remarking the possibility of finding pedunculated ICDs or neoplasm arising over an ICD.

Role of probiotics in management of diverticular disease.

Patients with diverticular disease may experience a variety of chronic symptoms, including abdominal discomfort, bloating, and altered bowel habit. They are also at risk of complications, including hemorrhage, diverticulitis, abscess, and fistula formation. The potential role of abnormal colonic microflora in the pathogenesis of diverticular inflammation has led to investigation of novel therapies such as probiotics. Probiotics are microorganisms that may be of net benefit to humans when consumed. The rationale and safety of their use in diverticular disease is discussed and current literature is reviewed.

Features and management of colonic diverticular disease.

Diverticular disease is one of the most prevalent gastrointestinal conditions to afflict Western populations. Although the majority of patients with diverticulosis remain asymptomatic, about one third will develop symptoms at some point in their lives. Symptomatic diverticular disease can range from chronic mild gastrointestinal distress to acute bouts of diverticulitis complicated by abscess or frank colonic perforation. The mainstay of treatment of symptomatic diverticular disease has long been bowel rest, antibiotics, and pain control, reserving surgery for those with complicated disease. This review discusses the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and management of the spectrum of diverticular disease, including recent advances in the treatment of chronic diverticular disease.