In vivo potentiation of cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (II) antitumor activity by pretreatment with sparsomycin.

The influence of protein synthesis inhibition by sparsomycin (Sm) on in vivo cisplatin activity has been studied on BALBc X DBA2: F1 mice bearing L1210 leukemia i.p. Sm alone at the dose range from 0.5 to 3.0 mg/kg did not significantly improve animal survival. Sm potentiated cisplatin activity only when given 3 or 6 h prior to cisplatin (P less than 0.001). Sm 0.5-1.5 mg/kg 3 h prior to cisplatin resulted in a significant prolongation of animal survival (P less than 0.001) and 66% cures in each group versus 0% due to cisplatin alone. Sm pretreatment decreased weight loss due to cisplatin suggesting that it probably is able to decrease cisplatin toxicity.

Potentiation of cisplatin antitumor activity on L1210 leukemia s.c. by sparsomycin and three of its analogues.

Sparsomycin (Sm) is a known antibiotic derived from Streptomyces. Its potential antitumor activity stimulated the search for a synthetic production method and the development of new derivatives. In a recent screening investigation, three Sm analogues appeared to be more active and considerably less toxic than the parent drug. Sparsomycins became especially interesting when it was shown that Sm potentiates the antitumor activity of cisplatin. In the present study Sm and its three promising analogues: deshydroxy-Sm (dSm), ethyl-deshydroxy-Sm (EdSm) and n-pentyl-Sm (PSm) were studied for their cisplatin potentiating effect. The experiments were performed on CD2F1 mice inoculated with 10(6) L1210 cells s.c. Sparsomycins were administered i.p. 3 h before cisplatin on days 1, 5 and 9. Three of the drugs, Sm, dSm and PSm, showed no potentiating effect in this tumor model. At a dose of 10 mg/kg, EdSm potentiated cisplatin antitumor activity 2.8 times (P less than 0.01) without an increase in weight loss. These results warrant further investigation.

Correlation of the in vitro cytotoxicity of ethyldeshydroxysparsomycin and cisplatin with the in vivo antitumour activity in murine L1210 leukaemia and two resistant L1210 subclones.

The cultured murine leukaemia L1210 cell populations used in the present study were derived from L1210 cells that had been grown in vivo. Subclones resistant to sparsomycin (L1210/Sm) or cisplatin (L1210/CDDP) were also developed in vivo. The doubling times of the cultured cell populations were identical. Fractions surviving after drug treatment in vitro were determined by colony formation in soft agar. The results, based on the differential sensitivity of the cell populations to ethyldeshydroxysparsomycin (EdSm) and CDDP, indicated that after a short exposure, cultured L1210/CDDP cells were cross-resistant to EdSm. L1210/Sm cells, however, were not cross-resistant to CDDP. The results obtained in cultured cell populations were confirmed in vivo. CD2f1 mice bearing i.p. implants of 1 x 10(5) tumour cells were given EdSm or CDDP and a combination of the two agents. Drugs were given once daily every 4 days for 3 doses starting at 24 h after tumour implantation. Treatment of mice bearing L1210/wt leukaemia with combined EdSm and CDDP caused strongly synergistic antitumour activity. In animals bearing the two resistant subclones, however, combined drug treatment did not improve the antitumour activity. The corresponding median survival of mice receiving combined drug treatment was 60 days in each group containing 6 mice bearing L1210/wt, with 4-6 cures being noted; 19 days in animals harbouring L1210/Sm, with 2 cures being recorded among 6 mice; and 11 days in mice bearing L1210/CDDP, with no cure being obtained. The results of this study indicate that the synergism resulting from combined treatment with CDDP and EdSm is a function of the cellular properties of the target tumour-cell populations and is independent of host factors.

Pharmacokinetics and toxicology of sparsomycin in beagle dogs.

Sparsomycin is a cytotoxic drug exhibiting a broad spectrum of in vitro activity against murine tumors and many tumor cell lines. It also appears to be a potent stimulator of the antitumor activity of cisplatin against L1210 leukemia in vivo. However, because of its toxicity, the antitumor activity of sparsomycin on murine tumors in vivo has been disappointing. The purpose of our study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics of this drug as well as the possible mechanisms that produce sparsomycin toxicity. Tests on beagle dogs revealed that about 60% of the drug is eliminated by metabolic clearance, while 40% is eliminated by the kidneys. After a single bolus injection of 0.1 mg/kg sparsomycin without narcosis, sparsomycin was eliminated with a t beta 1/2 of 0.6-0.7 h, the AUC being 0.32-0.38 mg.h.l-1, and the volume of distribution (Vd) 0.26 l/kg. In addition to being subject to glomerular filtration, sparsomycin is probably also actively excreted and actively reabsorbed by the renal tubuli. Sparsomycin itself may inhibit its active tubular excretion, thus resulting in a decrease in the drug's renal clearance and its accumulation in the plasma. Sparsomycin appeared to be toxic primarily in the liver, disturbing its function and the synthesis of plasma proteins. Two out of five dogs developed hemorrhagic diathesis due to hypofibrinogenemia and deficiency of other blood-coagulation factors. Sparsomycin was not toxic to the bone marrow.

Potentiation of cisplatin antitumour activity by Ethyldeshydroxy-Sparsomycin in L1210 leukemia.

The combination of Ethyldeshydroxy-Sparsomycin (EdSm) with cisdiamminedichloroplatinum(II) (CDDP) caused significant antitumour activity against murine L1210 leukemia. Although single drug treatment by cisplatin generated some cures, all schedules of combined treatment, using nontoxic doses of EdSm (5mg/kg) and cisplatin (3 mg/kg), resulted in the cure of 4 to 6 mice in each group consisting of 6 mice. No differences in antitumour activity were observed between pretreatment, simultaneous treatment or posttreatment of cisplatin with EdSm. Increasing the number of tumour cells implanted i.p. diminished the antitumour effect of both EdSm as well as CDDP, but not for the drug combination. Changing the route of administration from i.p. to i.v. for one of the drugs out of the combination resulted in loss of antitumour activity.

Schedule-dependent enhancement of antitumor activity of ethyldeshydroxy-sparsomycin in combination with classical antineoplastic agents.

The efficacy of the protein synthesis inhibitor ethyldeshydroxy-sparsomycin (EDSM) as a biochemical response modifier of several antitumor agents against L1210 leukemia and B16 melanoma is described. Seven drugs with different intracellular targets were selected for this combination study. Tumor implantation and drug treatment were both i.p., and the time interval between the administration of EDSM and the cytostatic agent was varied. Our results show that in the B16 tumor model EDSM is not able to potentiate any of these drugs, whereas antagonism is seen in combination with doxo-rubicin (DX). In the L1210 tumor model, however, no loss of activity is seen for this specific combination. The effect of the combination of cytosar (Ara-C), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or vincristine (VCR) with EDSM in the L1210 model is strongly time interval dependent. Loss of 5-FU antitumor activity is seen when EDSM is given 3 or 24 h after 5-FU; however, no effect is observed when EDSM is given 6 h after 5-FU. Enhancement of the 5-FU activity is not noticed. The VCR activity is potentiated when EDSM is given at least 6 h after VCR administration, which increases the antitumor response from 32 to > 60 days and the percentage survivors from 33 to 83% (p = 0.04). In combination with Ara-C, potentiation of antitumor activity is seen only when EDSM is given 24 h after Ara-C, which increases the antitumor response from 32 to > 55 days and the percentage survivors from 11 to 50% (p = 0.008). No modulatory effects are found when EDSM is combined with carmustine or DX.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)