Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 516
Filtrar
Más filtros

Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 22(1): 1063, 2022 Aug 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35986319

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Sterilization is the only family planning method that involves relatively large amount compensation. So, the study attempts to examine the role of incentives received against the sterilization procedures on the reporting of sterilization regret in India. METHODS: The study used data from the fourth round of National Family Health Survey, 2015-16, which gathered the information on sterilization regret from 1,94,207 ever-married women. Multivariate logistic analysis and predicted probabilities approach was used to study the effect of compensation received on the sterilization regret in India. RESULTS: Results show that women who have received compensation were 33% less likely to report sterilization regret. It was found that 70% of women who undergone sterilization in public facility didn't incur any expenditure, rather received incentives. It is observed that women who had undergone operation in private facility spent a large amount than women who had done their operation in public facility. The regret in the private facility mainly results from high out of pocket expenditure on sterilization procedures. Around eight percent of women regretted getting sterilized in a private hospital and received some compensation amount, vis a vis the six percent who regretted undergoing sterilization in public facility and received compensation. CONCLUSION: The study calls for a need to standardize the cost of sterilization procedure in India's health facilities. A good alternative for reducing the cost could be Public-Private Partnership.


Asunto(s)
Conflicto Familiar , Motivación , Emociones , Femenino , Humanos , India , Esterilización , Esterilización Reproductiva/métodos
2.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 224(3): 258-265.e4, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32941790

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: After strong evidence and major organizations recommending salpingectomy over tubal ligation, we sought to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the intraoperative attributes and complication rates associated with these 2 procedures. DATA SOURCES: We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and clinical trials registries without time or language restrictions. The search was conducted in February 2020. Database searches revealed 74 potential studies, of which 11 were examined at the full-text level. Of these, 6 studies were included in the qualitative analysis and 5 studies were included in the meta-analysis. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials comparing salpingectomy with tubal ligation in women seeking sterilization. We included studies that also had at least 1 outcome listed in the population/patient problem, intervention, comparison, outcome, and time. Articles were excluded if they did not meet the inclusion criteria or if data were not reported and the authors did not respond to inquiries. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Abstracts and full-text articles were assessed by 2 authors independently using the blinded coding assignment function or EPPI-Reviewer 4. Conflicting selections were resolved by consensus. The quality of included studies was determined using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials. Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias for each study; disagreements were resolved by consensus. RESULTS: There were few differences between the procedures, with no differences in most important clinical outcomes (antimüllerian hormone, blood loss, length of hospital stay, pre- or postoperative complications, or wound infections). A single study reported a reduced rate of pregnancies with salpingectomy (risk ratio, 0.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-1.02), but this did not reach statistical significance (P=.05). CONCLUSION: We conclude from these data that salpingectomy is as safe and efficacious as tubal ligation for sterilization and may be preferred, where appropriate, to reduce the risk of ovarian cancer.


Asunto(s)
Salpingectomía , Esterilización Reproductiva/métodos , Esterilización Tubaria , Femenino , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
3.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 124: 104968, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34062206

RESUMEN

Quinacrine sterilization (QS) is a nonsurgical female method used by more than 175,000 women in over 50 countries. With FDA approval, QS is expected to be used by hundreds of millions of women. The negative international health consequences of the results of a 2-year rat study in 2010 by Cancel et al. in Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology (RTP) (56:156-165) are incalculable. S1C(R2) was ignored in this study, including the fundamental concept of maximum tolerated dose (MTD), which resulted in the use of massive doses (up to 35 times the MTD) which killed many of the rats and destroyed the uterus of survivors. The design of this rat study was built on the false assertion that this study mimics what happens in women. Cancel et al. (2010), concludes it "seems most likely" that genotoxicity was a major factor in the carcinogenicity observed, prompting the FDA to halt further research of QS. In RTP, McConnell et al. (2010), and Haseman et al. (2015), using the authors' data, definitively determined the carcinogenicity to be secondary to necrosis and chronic inflammation. Decisions made in the design, conduct, analysis, interpretation and reporting in this study lack scientific foundation. This paper explores these decisions.


Asunto(s)
Quinacrina/toxicidad , Proyectos de Investigación/normas , Esterilización Reproductiva/métodos , Pruebas de Toxicidad Crónica/normas , Animales , Exactitud de los Datos , Aprobación de Drogas , Femenino , Humanos , Dosis Máxima Tolerada , Quinacrina/administración & dosificación , Ratas , Pruebas de Toxicidad Crónica/métodos , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
4.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 222(5): 503.e1-503.e3, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31981512

RESUMEN

There is increasing adoption of opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention at the time of gynecologic surgery, which includes the postpartum period. However, there is no consensus on an ideal surgical approach for the parturient vasculature. We describe a safe, low-cost, and accessible approach for bilateral salpingectomy during cesarean delivery that we call the "Mesosalpinx Isolation Salpingectomy Technique" (MIST) that can guide institutions to standardize their postpartum salpingectomy procedures when advanced vessel-sealing devices are not available. In the MIST technique, avascular windows are created within the mesosalpinx close to the tubal vessels. The vasculature is thus fully skeletonized and isolated from the adjacent mesosalpinx before suture ligation, which ensures security of the free-tie to the individual vessels and avoids sharp injury to the mesosalpinx. Not using vessel-sealing devices also eliminates the risk of thermal injury to the adjacent ovarian tissue and vasculature and potentially achieves a cost-savings for the hospital and patient. MIST has been performed in 141 cesarean deliveries in the past 4 years. There were no noted bleeding complications during the salpingectomy procedure, blood transfusions, or instances of postoperative surgical reexploration. In our experience, a surgeon who is new to the procedure takes approximately 15 minutes to complete a bilateral salpingectomy. Those surgeons who are experienced in MIST need only 5 minutes. A video is included that demonstrates the technique.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea/métodos , Neoplasias Ováricas/prevención & control , Salpingectomía/métodos , Esterilización Reproductiva/métodos , Ligamento Ancho/cirugía , Ahorro de Costo , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Electrocirugia/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Ligadura , Embarazo , Salpingectomía/economía , Esterilización Reproductiva/economía , Técnicas de Sutura
5.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 223(2): 234.e1-234.e8, 2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32087147

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Improved patient outcomes and satisfaction associated with enhanced recovery after surgery protocols have increasingly replaced traditional perioperative anesthesia care. Fast-track surgery pathways have been extensively validated in patients undergoing hysterectomies, yet the impact on fertility-sparing laparoscopic gynecologic operations, particularly those addressing chronic pain conditions, has not been examined. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine the effects of enhanced recovery after surgery pathway implementation compared with conventional perioperative care in women undergoing laparoscopic minimally invasive nonhysterectomy gynecologic procedures. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women undergoing uterine-sparing laparoscopic gynecologic procedures for benign conditions (tubal/adnexal pathology, endometriosis, or leiomyomas) during a 24 month period before and after enhanced recovery after surgery implementation at a tertiary care center. We compared immediate perioperative outcomes and 30 day complications. The primary outcome was same-day discharge rates. Factors influencing unplanned admissions, postoperative pain, sedation, nausea, and vomiting represented secondary analyses. RESULTS: A total of 410 women (enhanced recovery after surgery, n = 196; conventional perioperative care, n = 214) met inclusion criteria. Following enhanced recovery after surgery implementation, same-day discharge rates increased by 9.4% (P = .001). Reductions in postoperative pain and nausea/vomiting represented the primary driving factor behind lower unplanned admissions. Higher preoperative antiemetic medication administration in the enhanced recovery after surgery group resulted in a 57% reduction in postanesthesia care unit antiemetics (P < .001). Total perioperative narcotic medication use was also significantly reduced by 64% (P < .001), and the enhanced recovery after surgery cohort still demonstrated significantly lower postanesthesia unit care pain scores at hours 2 and 3 (P < .001). A 19 minute shorter postanesthesia care unit stay was noted in the enhanced recovery after surgery cohort (P = .036). Increased same-day discharge did not lead to higher postoperative complications or changes in 30 day emergency department visits or readmissions in patients with enhanced recovery after surgery. CONCLUSION: Enhanced recovery after surgery implementation resulted in increased same-day discharge rates and improved perioperative outcomes without affecting 30 day morbidity in women undergoing laparoscopic minimally invasive nonhysterectomy gynecologic procedures.


Asunto(s)
Recuperación Mejorada Después de la Cirugía , Enfermedades de los Genitales Femeninos/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/métodos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Dolor Pélvico/cirugía , Adulto , Periodo de Recuperación de la Anestesia , Desnervación/métodos , Endometriosis/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Infertilidad Femenina/cirugía , Leiomioma/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Quistes Ováricos/cirugía , Dolor Postoperatorio/epidemiología , Náusea y Vómito Posoperatorios/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Profilácticos/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Salpingooforectomía , Esterilización Reproductiva/métodos , Miomectomía Uterina/métodos , Neoplasias Uterinas/cirugía , Adulto Joven
6.
Fish Physiol Biochem ; 46(4): 1199-1205, 2020 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32385720

RESUMEN

This study was conducted to determine if diets supplemented with turmeric powder (Curcuma longa) affected the reversible sterilization of Pseudotropheus socolofi. Three experimental diets were formulated to contain 0%, 10%, and 14% turmeric powder. The fish (mean weight 13 g) were randomly divided into groups consisting of 1 male and 4 females for each aquarium and were kept together for 137 days. The control group was fed a diet without turmeric, while the others were fed diets with turmeric for the first 75 days. All groups were then fed the control diet from day 75 to 137. The results showed that turmeric powder supplementation did not affect growth performance (p Ëƒ 0.05). A histopathological examination of the ovaries, performed on two samples on days 75 and 137, revealed that high doses of turmeric decreased number of ovulated vitellogenic follicles and ovarian activity. Moreover, immature follicle density was excessive in groups fed turmeric powder. However, the number of ovulated vitellogenic follicles increased in groups fed diets containing 10% and 14% turmeric after feeding them with the turmeric-free control diet from day 75 to 137. In conclusion, the study revealed that supplementing diets with high ratios of turmeric can influence ovarian activity; however, these effects can be reversed by ceasing supplementation.


Asunto(s)
Cíclidos/fisiología , Curcuma/química , Curcumina/toxicidad , Análisis de Varianza , Alimentación Animal , Animales , Peso Corporal/efectos de los fármacos , Cíclidos/crecimiento & desarrollo , Curcumina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Hepatopáncreas/efectos de los fármacos , Masculino , Ovario/efectos de los fármacos , Esterilización Reproductiva/métodos , Esterilización Reproductiva/veterinaria
7.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 220(1): 106.e1-106.e10, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30170036

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Removal of the fallopian tubes at the time of hysterectomy or interval sterilization has become routine practice to prevent ovarian cancer. While emerging as a strategy, uptake of this procedure at the time of cesarean delivery for pregnant women seeking permanent sterilization has not been widely adopted due to perceptions of increased morbidity and operative difficulty with a lack of available data in this setting. OBJECTIVE: We sought to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing strategies for long-term sterilization and ovarian cancer risk reduction at the time of cesarean delivery, including bilateral tubal ligation, opportunistic salpingectomy, and long-acting reversible contraception. STUDY DESIGN: A decision-analytic and cost-effectiveness model was constructed for pregnant women undergoing cesarean delivery who desired permanent sterilization in the US population, comparing 3 strategies: (1) bilateral tubal ligation, (2) bilateral opportunistic salpingectomy, and (3) postpartum long-acting reversible contraception. This theoretic cohort consisted of 110,000 pregnant women desiring permanent sterilization at the time of cesarean delivery and ovarian cancer prevention at an average of 35 years who were monitored for an additional 40 years based on an average US female life expectancy of 75 years. The primary outcome measure was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Effectiveness was measured as quality-adjusted life years. Secondary outcomes included: the number of ovarian cancer cases and deaths, procedure-related complications, and unintended and ectopic pregnancies. The 1-, 2-, and 3-way and Monte Carlo probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. The willingness-to-pay threshold was set at $100,000. RESULTS: Both bilateral tubal ligation and bilateral opportunistic salpingectomy with cesarean delivery have favorable cost-effectiveness ratios. In the base case analysis, salpingectomy was more cost-effective with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $23,189 per quality-adjusted life year compared to tubal ligation. Long-acting reversible contraception after cesarean was not cost-effective (ie, dominated). Although salpingectomy and tubal ligation were both cost-effective over a wide range of cost and risk estimates, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio analysis was highly sensitive to the uncertainty around the estimates of salpingectomy cancer risk reduction, risk of perioperative complications, and cost. Monte Carlo probabilistic sensitivity analysis estimated that tubal ligation had a 49% chance of being the preferred strategy over salpingectomy. If the true salpingectomy risk of perioperative complications is >2% higher than tubal ligation or if the cancer risk reduction of salpingectomy is <52%, then tubal ligation is the preferred, more cost-effective strategy. CONCLUSION: Bilateral tubal ligation and bilateral opportunistic salpingectomy with cesarean delivery are both cost-effective strategies for permanent sterilization and ovarian cancer risk reduction. Although salpingectomy and tubal ligation are both reasonable strategies for cesarean patients seeking permanent sterilization and cancer risk reduction, threshold analyses indicate that the risks and benefits of salpingectomy with cesarean delivery need to be better defined before a preferred strategy can be determined.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea/métodos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Neoplasias Ováricas/prevención & control , Salpingectomía/métodos , Esterilización Tubaria/métodos , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Terapia Combinada , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Salpingectomía/economía , Esterilización Reproductiva/economía , Esterilización Reproductiva/métodos , Esterilización Tubaria/economía , Estados Unidos
8.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 26(7): 1363-1368, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30771489

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the change in the rate of laparoscopic salpingectomy for sterilization after the release of the November 2013 Society of Gynecologic Oncology Clinical Practice Statement and the January 2015 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee Opinion: Salpingectomy for Ovarian Cancer Prevention. We hypothesized there would be an increase in salpingectomy as a percentage of total laparoscopic sterilizations performed without an increase in complications when compared with conventional bilateral tubal ligation (BTL). DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Four university-affiliated hospitals in Houston, TX, and New York, NY. PATIENTS: All women 21 years or older who underwent interval laparoscopic permanent sterilization between April 2013 and September 2016. INTERVENTIONS: Sterilization by bilateral salpingectomy or conventional tubal ligation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were 454 sterilization procedures identified; 60% were BTLs, whereas 40% were salpingectomies. The rate of use of salpingectomy significantly increased from 5% to 9% in 2013 to 2014 to 78% by 2016. There was no significant difference in intraoperative or postoperative complications or estimated blood loss. The mean procedure time was 54 minutes for salpingectomy compared with 45 minutes for BTL (p <.0001). Salpingectomy was more likely to require 3 ports compared with 2 ports for BTL (p <.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The Society of Gynecologic Oncology and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' support of salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention increased its use for sterilization. Based on this study, laparoscopic bilateral salpingectomy is a safe method of sterilization without an increase in perioperative risk compared with conventional tubal ligation. Physicians should incorporate these findings and implications when counseling patients regarding contraception and permanent sterilization.


Asunto(s)
Seguridad del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Salpingectomía/métodos , Esterilización Reproductiva/métodos , Esterilización Tubaria/métodos , Adulto , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Laparoscopía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 20(1): 1, 2019 Dec 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31888624

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In 2014, 16 women died following female sterilization operations in Bilaspur, a district in central India. In addition to those 16 deaths, 70 women were hospitalized for critical conditions (Sharma, Lancet 384,2014). Although the government of India's guidelines for female sterilization mandate infection prevention practices, little is known about the extent of infection prevention preparedness and practice during sterilization procedures that are part of the country's primary health care services. This study assesses facility readiness for infection prevention and adherence to infection prevention practices during female sterilization procedures in rural northern India. METHOD: The data for this study were collected in 2016-2017 as part of a family planning quality of care survey in selected public health facilities in Bihar (n = 100), and public (n = 120) and private health facilities (n = 97) in Uttar Pradesh. Descriptive analysis examined the extent of facility readiness for infection prevention (availability of handwashing facilities, new or sterilized gloves, antiseptic lotion, and equipment for sterilization). Correlation and multivariate statistical methods were used to examine the role of facility readiness and provider behaviors on infection prevention practices during female sterilization. RESULT: Across the three health sectors, 62% of facilities featured all four infection prevention components. Sterilized equipment was lacking in all three health sectors. In facilities with all four components, provider adherence to infection prevention practices occurred in only 68% of female sterilization procedures. In Bihar, 76% of public health facilities evinced all four components of infection prevention, and in those facilities provider's adherence to infection prevention practices was almost universal. In Uttar Pradesh, where only 55% of public health facilities had all four components, provider adherence to infection prevention practices occurred in only 43% of female sterilization procedures. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that facility preparedness for infection prevention does play an important role in provider adherence to infection prevention practices. This phenomenon is not universal, however. Not all doctors from facilities prepared for infection prevention adhere to the practices, highlighting the need to change provider attitudes. Unprepared facilities need to procure required equipment and supplies to ensure the universal practice of infection prevention.


Asunto(s)
Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/organización & administración , Adhesión a Directriz , Control de Infecciones/organización & administración , Esterilización Reproductiva/métodos , Análisis de Varianza , Servicios de Planificación Familiar , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Fuerza Laboral en Salud , Humanos , India/epidemiología , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Control de Infecciones/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Atención Primaria de Salud , Instalaciones Públicas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Servicios de Salud Rural , Esterilización/instrumentación , Esterilización Reproductiva/efectos adversos , Esterilización Reproductiva/mortalidad
10.
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care ; 24(6): 480-486, 2019 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31566414

RESUMEN

Objectives: This study aimed to analyse the association between the decision-making pattern and the use of long-acting and permanent methods of contraception (LAPMs) among married and cohabiting women in Indonesia, by controlling for variables at the individual and community or regional level, and geographical area (province).Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted using secondary data from Performance Monitoring and Accountability 2020 (PMA2020) which involved 4724 married or cohabitating women aged 15-49 years. Data were analysed using bivariate and multivariate analysis. Multilevel logistic regression was performed to investigate the determinants by taking geographical area into account.Results: The majority of women (63.8%) had made their own decision on current contraceptive use, 30.1% had made a joint decision with their partner or health care provider, and 6.1% had not been involved in the decision-making process. Multilevel analysis showed that the decision-making pattern and individual level factors were significantly associated with LAPM use, and variables at community or regional level were not significant predictors. Compared with women who had made their own decision on contraceptive use, LAPM use was 2.3 times higher in women who had made a joint decision with their partner or health care provider (odds ratio [OR] 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0, 2.7; p < .001) and more than three times higher in women not involved in the decision-making process (OR 3.1; 95% CI 2.3, 4.1; p < .001).Conclusion: Coercion potentially occurs in the contraceptive decision-making process. Our findings suggest that LAPM use may be increased by encouraging joint contraceptive decision making. Increasing women's participation in the decision-making process is an integral part of respecting women's reproductive autonomy.


Asunto(s)
Anticoncepción/métodos , Anticoncepción/psicología , Toma de Decisiones , Anticoncepción Reversible de Larga Duración/psicología , Esterilización Reproductiva/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Coerción , Estudios Transversales , Servicios de Planificación Familiar , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Indonesia , Modelos Logísticos , Anticoncepción Reversible de Larga Duración/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Parejas Sexuales , Factores Socioeconómicos , Esterilización Reproductiva/métodos , Adulto Joven
11.
Biol Reprod ; 99(3): 556-564, 2018 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29635315

RESUMEN

A technique for rescuing and propagating endangered species involves implanting germ line stem cells into surrogates of a host species whose primordial germ cells (PGCs) have been destroyed. We induced sterilization in sterlet (Acipenser ruthenus) embryos by means of ultraviolet (UV) irradiation at the vegetal pole, the source of early-stage PGCs of sturgeon eggs. The optimal cell stage and length of UV irradiation for the effective repression of the developing PGCs were determined by exposing embryos at the one- to four-cell stage to different doses of irradiation at a wavelength of 254 nm (the optimal absorbance spectrum for germplasm destruction). The vegetal pole region of the embryos was labeled immediately upon irradiation with GFP bucky ball mRNA to monitor the amount of germ plasm and FITC-dextran (M.W. 500,000) to obtain the number of PGCs in the embryos. The size of the germ plasm and number of surrounding mitochondria in the irradiated embryos and controls were observed using transmission electron microscopy, which revealed a drastic reduction in both on the surface of the vegetal pole in the treated embryos. Furthermore, the reduction in the number of PGCs was proportional to the dose of UV irradiation. Under the conditions tested, optimum irradiation for PGCs removal was seen at 360 mJ/cm2 at the one-cell stage. Although some PGCs were observed after the UV irradiation, they significantly reduced in number as the embryos grew. We conclude that UV irradiation is a useful and efficient technique to induce sterility in surrogate sturgeons.


Asunto(s)
Células Germinales Embrionarias/efectos de la radiación , Especies en Peligro de Extinción , Peces/embriología , Rayos Ultravioleta , Animales , Embrión no Mamífero/efectos de la radiación , Células Germinales Embrionarias/trasplante , Femenino , Esterilización Reproductiva/métodos , Esterilización Reproductiva/veterinaria
12.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 219(2): 172.e1-172.e8, 2018 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29852159

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence has suggested that the fallopian tube may often be the site of origin for the most common and lethal form of ovarian cancer. As a result, many Colleges of Obstetrics and Gynecology, including the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecology, are recommending surgical removal of the fallopian tube (bilateral salpingectomy) at the time of other gynecologic surgeries (particularly hysterectomy and tubal sterilization) in women at general population risk for ovarian cancer, collectively referred to as opportunistic salpingectomy. OBJECTIVE: Previous research with the use of hospital data has indicated good perioperative safety of opportunistic salpingectomy, but no data on minor complications have been presented. Herein, we examine whether women who undergo opportunistic salpingectomy are at increased risk of minor complications after surgery. STUDY DESIGN: We identified all women in British Columbia who underwent opportunistic salpingectomy between 2008 and 2014 and examined all physician visits in the 2 weeks after discharge from the hospital. We compared women who underwent opportunistic salpingectomy at hysterectomy with women who underwent hysterectomy alone and women who underwent opportunistic salpingectomy for sterilization with women who underwent tubal ligation. We examined visits for surgical infection, surgical complication, orders for laboratory tests, and orders for imaging (x-ray, ultrasound scan, or computed tomography scan) and whether women who underwent opportunistic salpingectomy were more likely to fill a prescription for an antibiotic or analgesic in the 2 weeks after discharge from the hospital. We calculated adjusted odds ratios for these outcomes, adjusting for other gynecologic conditions, surgical approach, and patient age. RESULTS: We included 49,275 women who had undergone a hysterectomy alone, a hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy, a hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, a tubal ligation, or an opportunistic salpingectomy for sterilization. In women who had undergone opportunistic salpingectomy, there was no increased risk for physician visits for surgical infection, surgical complication, ordering a laboratory test, or ordering imaging in the 2 weeks after discharge. There was no increased risk of filling a prescription for an antibiotic. However, women who underwent opportunistic salpingectomy were at approximately 20% increased odds of filling a prescription for an analgesic in the 2 weeks after discharge from the hospital (adjusted odds ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-1.32 for hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy; adjusted odds ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-1.29 for opportunistic salpingectomy for sterilization). CONCLUSION: We report no differences in minor complications between women who undergo opportunistic salpingectomy and women who undergo hysterectomy alone or tubal ligation, except for a slightly increased likelihood of filling a prescription for analgesic medication in the immediate 2 weeks after discharge.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Ováricas/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Salpingectomía/métodos , Esterilización Reproductiva/métodos , Adulto , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Colombia Británica , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Histerectomía/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Postoperatorio/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico por imagen , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Salpingooforectomía/métodos , Esterilización Tubaria/métodos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología
13.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 25(3): 393-401, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29180307

RESUMEN

Female sterilization is the most popular and common contraceptive method worldwide. Because hysteroscopic sterilization techniques are used less often due to side effects, the number of laparoscopic sterilization is increasing. A systematic overview concerning the most optimal anesthetic technique for laparoscopic sterilization is lacking. We performed a systematic review to compare conscious sedation with general anesthesia for laparoscopic sterilization procedures with respect to clinical relevant outcome measures, such as operating times, perioperative parameters and complications, patient comfort, recovery, and patient satisfaction. We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and EMBASE for randomized controlled trials comparing general anesthesia with conscious sedation for laparoscopic sterilization. Two authors (AGH and HAAMvV) abstracted and entered data into RevMan. Methodologic quality of the included trials was critically appraised. For our main outcome measures mean differences (continuous variables) and risk ratios (dichotomous variables) with 95% confidence intervals using random-effect models were calculated. Four randomized controlled trials were included comparing general anesthesia versus local anesthesia with conscious sedation for laparoscopic sterilization. The methodologic quality of the studies was moderate to good. Both techniques were comparable with regard to operating times, complications, and postoperative pain. However, local anesthesia with conscious sedation showed better results compared with general anesthesia with respect to recovery times, patient complaints of sore throat, and patient recovery and satisfaction. In conclusion, this systematic review about anesthetic techniques for laparoscopic sterilization showed that both general anesthesia and conscious sedation have no major anesthetic complications and may therefore be safe. Patients might benefit from conscious sedation in terms of recovery times, sore throat, and patient recovery and satisfaction, but only a few studies are included in the review and are relatively old. New research regarding this subject is needed to advise our patients most optimally in the future about the best anesthetic technique to be used when choosing for a laparoscopic sterilization procedure.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia General , Anestesia Local/métodos , Sedación Consciente/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Esterilización Reproductiva/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Tempo Operativo , Satisfacción del Paciente
14.
Surg Technol Int ; 32: 156-161, 2018 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29791712

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe a non-hysterectomy surgical technique for symptomatic patients with >2 Essure® (Bayer Healthcare, Whippany, New Jersey) devices. DESIGN: Patients (n=4) presented with sharp pelvic pain, irregular vaginal bleeding, dyspareunia, weight gain, hair loss, fatigue, and/or diffuse skin rash, all of which were absent before undergoing hysteroscopic sterilization (HS). Hysterosalpingogram obtained before surgical excision of contraceptive tubal implants confirmed more than two Essure® devices in all patients. Except for HS-associated complaints, all patients were in otherwise good general health and none had any history of prior pelvic pathology. Hysteroscopy was followed by 5mm triple-port laparoscopic cornual dissection, modified partial bilateral salpingectomy, and foreign body removal under fluoroscopy and/or radiographic guidance. RESULTS: In this group, mean±SD patient age was 41±8yrs and interval between HS and device removal was 6.4±2.7yrs. At the conclusion of each case (mean±SD operative time=179±11min), imaging studies were reviewed by an attending radiologist and verified no retained metal in the abdomen. Conversion to laparotomy, hysterectomy, or blood transfusion was unnecessary for any patients, and all were discharged home within three hours. Their postoperative course continues to be satisfactory. CONCLUSION: Patients with more than two Essure® devices comprise an unusual group with a complex pelvic foreign body presentation. This is the first report on surgical management for such patients, underscoring the importance of localizing these contraceptive devices with careful imaging before, during, and after surgery. Moreover, hysterectomy is not absolutely mandatory in this setting and intraoperative fluoroscopy/radiography can facilitate complete, safe removal of all implants on an out-patient basis. Creation of ICD-10 modifiers for various post-HS complaints would allow for improved surveillance of the Essure® phenomenon.


Asunto(s)
Dispositivos Anticonceptivos Femeninos/efectos adversos , Fluoroscopía/métodos , Cuerpos Extraños/cirugía , Histeroscopía/métodos , Salpingectomía/métodos , Esterilización Reproductiva , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor Pélvico/etiología , Esterilización Reproductiva/efectos adversos , Esterilización Reproductiva/métodos , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/métodos , Hemorragia Uterina/etiología
15.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol ; 29(4): 218-224, 2017 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28537948

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To describe the current data regarding effectiveness, complications, postoperative evaluation, and surgical interventions associated with Essure hysteroscopic sterilization. RECENT FINDINGS: Hysteroscopic sterilization is a commonly performed procedure that is offered as a well tolerated, effective, outpatient method of permanent sterilization. Over the past several years, concerns have been raised regarding correct placement and postoperative complications. This has led to statements by both the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in October, 2016 and American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists in February, 2017, as a significant portion of women seek removal of these devices. A current black-box warning issued by the FDA in 2016 recommends discussion of 'the probabilities of rates or events' of adverse outcomes associated with Essure placement. SUMMARY: Although hysteroscopic sterilization is usually a safe, effective option for permanent contraception, new evidence regarding complications has emphasized the need for proper education and counseling. Appropriate patient selection and knowledge of potential complications is paramount to ensuring patients, and medical providers are well informed and have realistic expectations regarding potential placement and postoperative issues.


Asunto(s)
Histeroscopía/métodos , Esterilización Reproductiva/métodos , Esterilización Tubaria/métodos , Anticoncepción/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Histeroscopía/efectos adversos , Dispositivos Intrauterinos/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Selección de Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Embarazo , Factores de Riesgo , Sociedades Médicas , Esterilización Reproductiva/efectos adversos , Esterilización Tubaria/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
16.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 24(1): 140-144, 2017 01 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27621196

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether de novo development of nickel sensitization is related to placement of the Essure device, and to evaluate whether the grade of reaction to nickel increased after device placement in patients with a confirmed nickel allergy. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: Two nonacademic training hospitals in The Netherlands. PATIENTS: Healthy women of childbearing age desiring permanent sterilization. INTERVENTIONS: At least 72 hours before Essure sterilization, each patient received 2 patches, 1 patch with a nickel solution in 5% petrolatum and 1 control patch. In addition, the patient was asked to complete a questionnaire on allergy-related symptoms. The patch test was scored according to the criteria for contact dermatitis of Devos and Van Der Valk. At 3 months after Essure sterilization, the patch test and the questionnaire were repeated. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: All 169 patients underwent Essure sterilization and completed the patch test cycle. There were no statistically significant changes in patch test results and allergy-related symptoms after sterilization. Before sterilization, 29% of the patients had a positive patch test and 1.8% also showed a positive reaction to the control patch. Only 20.7% of the patients had a history of allergic reactions to nickel. After sterilization, 29% had a positive patch test and 0.6% also showed a positive reaction to the control patch. Among the patients with a positive patch test before sterilization, the grade of reaction did not increase after sterilization. Moreover, these patients did not exhibit any increase in allergy-related symptoms. Among 4 patients with a previous negative patch test, 2 developed a grade 1 reaction and 2 developed a grade 2 reaction after sterilization. Two of these 4 patients had a history of allergic reactions to nickel before sterilization despite a negative patch test. After sterilization, these 4 patients exhibited no increase in allergy-related symptoms. CONCLUSION: There were no statistically significant changes in nickel patch test results and allergy-related symptoms after Essure sterilization. Furthermore, among the patients with a positive patch test before Essure sterilization, the grade of reaction did not increase after sterilization. These results indicate that Essure sterilization likely is not related to nickel sensitization.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dispositivos Intrauterinos/efectos adversos , Níquel/efectos adversos , Pruebas del Parche/métodos , Esterilización Reproductiva/instrumentación , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Factores de Riesgo , Esterilización Reproductiva/efectos adversos , Esterilización Reproductiva/métodos
17.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 24(2): 305-308, 2017 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27867049

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the efficacy of electronic reminders for follow-up hysterosalpingography (HSG) after Essure hysteroscopic sterilization in an urban tertiary care hospital obstetrics and gynecology practice. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). SETTING: Obstetrics and gynecology practice at a university-affiliated urban tertiary care teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Two hundred and fifty patients who underwent Essure hysteroscopic sterilization between June 2011 and July 2014. INTERVENTION: Implementation of electronic reminders for the office staff. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty of 259 patients (96.5%) underwent Essure hysteroscopic sterilization and successful placement of coils into bilateral Fallopian tubes. Among these 250 patients, 135 (54%) returned for HSG at 3 months post-Essure as advised at the time of procedure. The use of electronic reminders prompted another 45 patients (18%) to return for HSG, improving the total post-Essure follow-up rate to 72%. CONCLUSION: Electronic reminders for the office staff of an urban tertiary care hospital's obstetrics and gynecology practice is an effective method for improving the rate of post-Essure HSG.


Asunto(s)
Histerosalpingografía/métodos , Histeroscopía/métodos , Sistemas Recordatorios , Esterilización Tubaria/métodos , Adulto , Cuidados Posteriores/métodos , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Sistemas Recordatorios/instrumentación , Sistemas Recordatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Esterilización Reproductiva/métodos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Población Urbana
18.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 24(4): 640-645, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28232037

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe safety, tolerability, and effectiveness results through a minimum 2-year follow-up of patients who underwent permanent sterilization with the Essure insert. DESIGN: A retrospective multicenter study (Canadian Task Force classification II2). SETTING: Seven general hospitals and 4 clinical teaching centers in Italy. PATIENTS: A total of 1968 women, mean age 39.5 years (range, 23-48 years) who underwent office hysteroscopic sterilization using the Essure insert between April 1, 2003, and December 30, 2014. INTERVENTION: The women underwent office hysteroscopic bilateral Essure insert placement, with satisfactory device location and tube occlusion based on hysterosalpingography or hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (HyCoSy). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Placement rate, successful bilateral tubal occlusion, perioperative adverse events, early postoperative (during the first 3 months of follow-up), and late complications were evaluated. Satisfactory insertion was accomplished in 97.2% of women and, in 4, perforation and 1 expulsion were detected during hysterosalpingography. Three unintended pregnancies occurred before the 3-month confirmation test. Two pregnancies were reported among women relying on the Essure inserts. Postprocedure pain was minimal and brief; in 9 women, pelvic pain became intractable, necessitating removal of the devices via laparoscopy. On telephone interviews, overall satisfaction was rated as "very satisfied" by the majority of women (97.6%), and no long-term adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: The findings from this extended Italian survey further support the effectiveness, tolerability, and satisfaction of Essure hysteroscopic sterilization when motivated women are selected and well informed of the potential risks of the device. Moreover, the results do not demonstrate an increased incidence of complications and pregnancies associated with long-term Essure use. Patients with a known hypersensitivity to nickel may be less suitable candidates for the Essure insert.


Asunto(s)
Esterilización Reproductiva , Esterilización Tubaria/métodos , Adulto , Trompas Uterinas/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad , Histerosalpingografía , Histeroscopía , Italia , Laparoscopía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Níquel/efectos adversos , Dolor/etiología , Embarazo , Embarazo no Planeado , Estudios Retrospectivos , Esterilización Reproductiva/efectos adversos , Esterilización Reproductiva/instrumentación , Esterilización Reproductiva/métodos , Esterilización Tubaria/efectos adversos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
19.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 43(12): 1863-1869, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28892212

RESUMEN

AIM: We aimed to determine the success rate of incidental appendectomy during post-partum sterilization (PPS) using the Chokchai technique and to compare the postoperative morbidity between patients who underwent this procedure with those who underwent simple PPS. METHODS: Appendectomy during PPS was performed in 141 patients from 1 May 2012 to 30 April 2014. The control group consisted of 182 simple PPS patients. Primary outcomes were the success rate of the procedure and secondary outcomes were postoperative morbidity and complications. RESULTS: The success rate of this procedure was 98.6%. There was no statistically significant difference in intraoperative blood loss, hospital length of stay, or postoperative morbidity. Appendectomy added 7.5 min to the total procedure. Intravenous sedation requirements were 13.7% and 33.3% in the control and study groups, respectively. Pathologic evaluation of resected appendices revealed 15 abnormalities (10.8%), including two cases of periappendicitis (1.4%). CONCLUSION: When carried out by experienced surgeons and with appropriate anesthesia, incidental appendectomy during PPS is safe. The Chokchai technique (approach through a small periumbilical incision) achieved a high success rate and resulted in minimal scar. Incidental appendectomy not only prevents any future appendicitis but also helps to detect periappendicitis and treat its primary cause. However, this is an option for only selected patients who are clearly informed about the possible risks and benefits of the procedure.


Asunto(s)
Apendicectomía/métodos , Periodo Posparto , Esterilización Reproductiva/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anestesia/métodos , Apendicitis/prevención & control , Sedación Consciente , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Paridad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
20.
Reprod Domest Anim ; 52 Suppl 2: 327-331, 2017 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27892642

RESUMEN

Over the last 40 years, researchers have explored methods to non-surgically suppress fertility in animals. Immunocontraception has been used to control wildlife populations but does not confer long-term immunity. The gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist deslorelin, formulated as an implant to provide 6-month to 1-year suppression of fertility in male dogs, is available commercially in some countries. Neither of these approaches provide permanent sterility. A single-dose, permanent treatment would be a valuable tool in dog and cat population control. The Michelson Prize and Grants (MPG) programme was initiated "to eliminate shelter euthanasia of healthy, adoptable companion animals and reduce populations of feral and free-roaming cats and dogs" offering a $25 million US prize for a non-surgical sterilant that is effective as a single treatment in both male and female dogs and cats. Michelson Prize and Grants programme has offered US $50 million in grant money for research and has attracted scientists worldwide. Approaches under study include gene therapy, small interfering RNA to inhibit reproductive targets and delivery of cytotoxins to pituitary gonadotrophs or GnRH producing neurons in the hypothalamus. Research in implant technology that could deliver compounds over an animal's lifetime is also underway. Details of funded grants and results to date can be found at: http://www.michelsonprizeandgrants.org/michelson-grants/research-findings. The next steps are translating the most promising research into products. The Alliance for Contraception of Cats and Dogs (ACC&D) is helping to research practical methods of marking sterilized animals to avoid costly retreatment and population modelling that will help guide field workers in use of resources for sterilization programmes.


Asunto(s)
Gatos , Perros , Esterilización Reproductiva/veterinaria , Animales , Distinciones y Premios , Anticoncepción/veterinaria , Anticoncepción Inmunológica/veterinaria , Anticonceptivos/administración & dosificación , Citotoxinas/administración & dosificación , Implantes de Medicamentos , Femenino , Silenciador del Gen , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/agonistas , Infertilidad , Masculino , Regulación de la Población/métodos , ARN Interferente Pequeño/administración & dosificación , Apoyo a la Investigación como Asunto , Esterilización Reproductiva/métodos , Pamoato de Triptorelina/administración & dosificación , Pamoato de Triptorelina/análogos & derivados
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA