[Efficacy and Safety Profile of Ocriplasmin Treatment - an Update]. / Wirkungen und Nebenwirkungen von Ocriplasmin ­ ein Update.

Pharmacological vitreolysis with ocriplasmin is an effective treatment option for eyes with vitreomacular traction. Pre-marketing and post-marketing clinical studies revealed an improvement of visual function in ocriplasmin treated eyes and showed a release of traction in up to 78% of cases. Treatment success is related to patient selection based on positive predictive factors. Adverse events, such as visual acuity loss, dyschromatopsia or photopsia are known to be self-limited in the majority of eyes. Structural outer retinal layer changes, such as ellipsoid zone disturbances or subretinal fluid accumulation on SD-OCT analysis, as well as ERG abnormalities, are transient and correlated to VMT release. Surgical outcomes in patients with a prior history of ocriplasmin injection have been shown to be comparable with patients who proceeded directly to surgery without ocriplasmin treatment.

Ocriplasmin for symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion.

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion (sVMA) is a recognised cause of visual loss and by tradition has been managed by pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). A less invasive alternative to surgery in some people is enzymatic vitreolysis, using an intravitreal injection of ocriplasmin. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of ocriplasmin compared to no treatment, sham or placebo for the treatment of sVMA. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (2017, Issue 1), MEDLINE Ovid (1946 to 24 February 2017), Embase Ovid (1947 to 24 February 2017), PubMed (1946 to 24 February 2017), the ISRCTN registry (www.isrctn.com/editAdvancedSearch); searched 24 February 2017, ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov); searched 24 February 2017 and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en); searched 24 February 2017. We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of people with sVMA. The intervention was intravitreal ocriplasmin 125 µg injection, and this was compared to placebo or sham injection (control). Placebo was defined as a single intravitreal injection of 0.10 mL placebo with identical drug vehicle diluted with saline. A sham injection was defined as the syringe hub or blunt needle touching the conjunctiva to simulate an injection. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently selected relevant trials, assessed methodological quality and extracted data. We graded the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS: This review included four RCTs conducted in Europe and the USA with a total of 932 eyes of 932 participants. Participants were 18 to 97 years of age, with evidence of focal vitreomacular adhesion (VMA) on optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging, with a best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/25 or worse in the study eye and 20/400 or better in the fellow eye. The interventions compared were intravitreal ocriplasmin versus sham (two RCTs) or placebo (two RCTs) injection. Both sham and placebo injection were classified as the control group. The main outcome measures were assessed at 28 days and six months. Overall, we judged the studies to have a low or unclear risk of bias. All four RCTs were sponsored by the manufacturers of ocriplasmin.Compared with control, ocriplasmin treatment was more likely to result in VMA release within 28 days (risk ratio (RR) 3.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.00 to 6.00; 859 eyes, 4 RCTs, high-certainty evidence). Approximately 97/1000 eyes will have VMA release within 28 days without treatment. An additional 237 eyes will have VMA release within 28 days for every 1000 eyes treated with ocriplasmin (95% CI 96 more to 482 more).Treatment with ocriplasmin was also more likely to result in macular hole closure (RR 2.87, 95% CI 1.50 to 5.51; 229 eyes, 3 RCTs, high-certainty evidence). Approximately 123/1000 eyes with macular holes will have closure with no treatment. An additional 231 eyes will have macular hole closure for every 1000 eyes treated with ocriplasmin (95% CI 62 more to 556 more).Eyes receiving ocriplasmin were also more likely to have complete posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) within 28 days (RR 2.94, 95% CI 1.39 to 6.24; 689 eyes, 3 RCTs, high-certainty evidence). Approximately 40/1000 eyes will have complete PVD within 28 days without treatment. An additional 78 eyes will have complete PVD within 28 days for every 1000 eyes treated with ocriplasmin (95% CI 16 more to 210 more).Eyes receiving ocriplasmin were more likely to achieve 3-line or greater improvement in BCVA at six months (RR 1.95, 95% CI 1.07 to 3.53; 674 eyes, 3 RCTs, moderate-certainty evidence). Approximately 61/1000 eyes will have a 3-line or greater improvement in BCVA at six months without treatment. An additional 58 eyes will have 3-line or greater improvement in BCVA at six months for every 1000 eyes treated with ocriplasmin (95% CI 9 more to 154 more).Receiving ocriplasmin also reduced the requirement for vitrectomy at six months (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.91; 689 eyes, 3 RCTs, moderate-certainty evidence). Approximately 265/1000 eyes will require vitrectomy at six months without treatment and 87 fewer eyes will require vitrectomy for every 1000 eyes treated with ocriplasmin (95% CI 24 fewer to 132 fewer).Treatment with ocriplasmin resulted in a greater improvement in validated Visual Function Questionnaire form score at six months (mean improvement difference 2.7 points, 95% CI 0.8 to 4.6; 652 eyes, 2 RCTs, moderate-certainty evidence).Eyes receiving ocriplasmin were more likely to have an adverse event (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.37, 909 eyes, 4 RCTs, moderate-certainty evidence). Approximately 571/1000 eyes will have an adverse event with sham or placebo injection and 106 more eyes will have an adverse event for every 1000 eyes treated with ocriplasmin (95% CI 52 more to 212 more). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from a limited number of RCTs suggests that ocriplasmin is useful in the treatment of sVMA. However, up to 20% of eyes treated with ocriplasmin will still require additional treatment with PPV within six months. There were more ocular adverse events in eyes treated with ocriplasmin than control (sham or placebo injection) treatment. Many of these adverse events, particularly vitreous floaters and photopsia, are known to be associated with posterior vitreous detachment. At present however, there is minimal published long-term safety data on eyes treated with ocriplasmin. Further large RCTs comparing ocriplasmin with other management options for sVMA would be beneficial.

Plasmin (Human) Administration in Acute Middle Cerebral Artery Ischemic Stroke: Phase 1/2a, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation, Safety Study.

BACKGROUND: This phase 1/2a, open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation, safety study describes the first evaluation of plasmin as an intracranial thrombolytic treatment for acute ischemic stroke in the middle cerebral artery. The rationale for intrathrombus administration is that plasmin would bind fibrin inside the targeted clot, protecting it from circulating inhibitors. METHODS: Plasmin was given in escalating doses within 9 hours of stroke onset, and treatment efficacy was determined in 5 patient cohorts (N = 40): cohort 1 (20 mg, .5 mL/min), cohort 2a (40 mg, .05 mL/min), cohort 2b (40 mg, .33 mL/min), cohort 3a (80 mg, .67 mL/min), and cohort 3b (80 mg, .33 mL/min). RESULTS: Plasmin was generally safe at doses as high as 80 mg. No symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was observed, and the rate of asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (12.5%) was consistent with that expected under supportive care. No relationship was observed between the plasmin dose and the incidence or severity of bleeding events, any particular serious adverse events, nor death. Changes in clinical chemistry, hematology, and coagulation parameters following plasmin treatment were unremarkable and unrelated to the dose. Plasmin administration resulted in successful reperfusion of the occluded vessel in 25% of patients across all cohorts, with no relationship between successful perfusion and total plasmin dose but a potential increase in reperfusion with slower infusion rates. CONCLUSIONS: Plasmin treatment of the occluded middle cerebral artery within 9 hours of stroke onset was well tolerated and did notincrease adverse outcomes; however, successful recanalization was achieved in only a limited number of patients.

Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment following intravitreal ocriplasmin.

PURPOSE: To describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients presenting with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) after ocriplasmin (OCP) injection. METHODS: Retrospective, multi-centre, observational case series with case note review. RESULTS: Eight patients with symptomatic vitreomacular traction (six with concomitant macular hole) were diagnosed with RRD after a median of 16 days (range 3-131 days) post-OCP injection. Presentation was within 3 weeks of the OCP injection in six of the cases. Five patients presented with symptoms post-OCP, and three were diagnosed asymptomatically on planned visits. Seven cases were phakic, one had high myopia (>8 dioptres), and two cases had lattice degeneration. Following RRD surgery, hole closure was achieved in 5/6 MH cases. The final median BCVA at 7 months was 20/80 (range 20/40-20/1200) similar to the baseline BCVA 20/80, with four patients gaining ≥1 line of vision compared to baseline but three losing ≥3 lines. CONCLUSIONS: RRD is a non-negligible risk associated with intravitreal OCP, and it should be used with caution in eyes with high myopia and peripheral retinal pathology predisposing to RRD. Detailed peripheral retinal examination is recommended pre- and postoperatively at all visits. Patients should be advised to seek attention if symptoms recur after initial presentation.

A RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY OF INTRAVITREAL OCRIPLASMIN IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS SCHEDULED FOR VITRECTOMY.

PURPOSE: To evaluate safety and preliminary efficacy of 175 µg of intravitreal ocriplasmin in pediatric patients scheduled for vitrectomy. METHODS: Based on a single-center, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, and double-masked Phase 2 study, 22 pediatric patients scheduled for vitrectomy were randomized 2:1 to 175-µg ocriplasmin injection or placebo. Treatment was administered midvitreous 30 minutes to 60 minutes before vitrectomy. Safety was assessed by reported adverse events (AEs), ophthalmologic examinations, fundus photography, and fluorescein angiography. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of eyes with total macular posterior vitreous detachment before vitrectomy or after application of suction. Secondary endpoints included vitreous liquefaction assessment before vitrectomy and immediate postoperative retinal reattachment. RESULTS: All patients experienced at least 1 AE. Most AEs were ocular and occurred in the study eye. Serious AEs were reported for 2 of 16 eyes (3.4%) in the ocriplasmin group and 2 of 8 eyes (11.1%) in the placebo group. One case of lens subluxation due to zonular disruption was observed in the ocriplasmin group. A clear efficacy signal was not observed. CONCLUSION: Intravitreal injection of 175 µg of ocriplasmin was tolerated in pediatric patients before vitrectomy; however, the small sample size in this study precluded adequate efficacy comparisons. AEs reported were consistent with those anticipated in pediatric patients.

Complications of intravitreal ocriplasmin for vitreomacular traction and macular hole: a prospective spectral-domain optical coherence tomography study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of intravitreal ocriplasmin prospectively, reporting potential complications in patients with vitreomacular traction (VMT) alone or associated with macular hole (MH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants in this prospective, multicenter study, were 24 patients with VMT (17 with VMT alone and seven with MH combined with VMT). All patients were treated with a single ocriplasmin injection and followed-up prospectively at baseline, day 7, 28 and the last examination of the follow-up for each patient (mean ± SD: 64.2 ± 24.4 d, range: 40-145 d). Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was assessed, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography was performed at each visit while the percentage of resolution of VMT and the association with various potential adverse events were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: 66.7% of patients presented VMT release at the end of the follow-up, while 28.6% exhibited MH closure. Severe adverse events, such as enlargement of preexisting MH and formation of lamellar MH, were observed in one and four cases, respectively and remained till the end of the follow-up. Moderate adverse events, such as ellipsoid zone disruption and subretinal fluid development, became evident seven days after injection, in four cases. Formation of cystoid macular edema (CME), not evident at baseline, was noticed in three cases at day 28 after injection. Mild adverse events, like vitreous floaters, photopsias, eye pain and foreign body sensation, were noticed at day 7 and resolved till the end of the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Mild and moderate adverse events occurred mainly during the first week of the follow-up, while severe adverse events, such as the lamellar MH formation and CME at day 28 post injection were seen.

Transient Subfoveal Fluid and Visual Loss after Ocriplasmin.

BACKGROUND: Intravitreal injection of ocriplasmin for the enzymatic resolution of vitreomacular traction was approved for the EU in 2013. We wish to report our clinical findings and adverse effects that were not observed in the registration trial. THERAPY AND OUTCOME: In 5 of our first 12 consecutive cases, resolution of the vitreomacular traction occurred after injecting ocriplasmin. 9 of the 12 patients developed subfoveal fluid, manifest at day 3 post-intervention; this was completely re-absorbed by 6 weeks in 8 of 9 eyes. All 9 cases with subretinal fluid exhibited a significant reduction in mean visual acuity at the first visit, of 0.33 LogMAR (p = 0.008, Wilcoxon signed rank test). After regression of the subretinal fluid, visual acuity returned to the baseline value. CONCLUSIONS: In the light of the documented adverse effects of the registration trial, the relatively high rate of subfoveal fluid after injecting ocriplasmin was surprising. Possible causes include enzymatic lysis of the matrix between the outer segments of the photoreceptors and the microvilli of the RPE-cells, or barrier disturbances in the RPE through lysis of the zonulae occludentes.

Safety of intravitreal ocriplasmin for focal vitreomacular adhesion in patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration.

PURPOSE: The evaluation of the safety and preliminary efficacy of 125 µg ocriplasmin intravitreal injection in patients with focal vitreomacular adhesion (VMA) and exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Randomized, sham-injection controlled, double-masked, multicenter, phase II trial. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 100 patients with VMA and wet AMD were randomized 3:1 to receive 125 µg ocriplasmin intravitreal injection or sham injection. METHODS: Study treatment was administered in the mid-vitreous cavity by injection. Post-treatment safety and efficacy assessments were made at baseline and on days 7, 14, and 28 and months 3, 6, and 12 after injection. Secondary efficacy end points were exploratory in nature. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The safety and tolerability of ocriplasmin were evaluated. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients with VMA release at day 28 after injection. Secondary end points reported included VMA release over time, total posterior vitreous detachment (PVD), change in visual acuity from baseline, and number of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections. RESULTS: The safety of ocriplasmin in patients with VMA and wet AMD was shown to be comparable to the known safety profile, with the majority of adverse events in the study eye occurring in the first 7 days after study treatment. A greater proportion of patients achieved VMA resolution and total PVD at month 12 with ocriplasmin compared with sham treatment. There was a decrease in the number of anti-VEGF injections with ocriplasmin at month 12 compared with the sham group, although no differences in visual acuity were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Ocriplasmin treatment in this population seems to be generally safe and well tolerated and resulted in more patients achieving VMA resolution and PVD with less anti-VEGF use compared with sham treatment.

Acute loss of vision after an intravitreal injection ocriplasmin: a functional evolutionary study for 1-year follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: Ocriplasmin is a human plasmin fragment indicated for vitreomacular traction treatment. With its increasing use, several reported cases have suggested possible toxicity to the retina. CASE: We describe a case of a 55-year-old woman with symptomatic vitreomacular traction and a macular hole in the right eye who showed an acute decrease in visual acuity after an intravitreal ocriplasmin injection. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography showed an alteration in the ellipsoid layer. Significant retinal vessel constriction was observed by angiography. The visual acuity improved to 20/100, and the electroretinogram progressively improved after the 1-year follow-up and following pars plana vitrectomy. CONCLUSIONS: A decrease in visual acuity and an enlargement of the macular hole were observed while studying this patient. This study shows the recovery of adverse effects caused by intravitreal injection of ocriplasmin for 1-year follow-up.

Transient vision loss after ocriplasmin injection.

PURPOSE: Transient vision loss is a poorly understood complication of ocriplasmin injection. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective medical records review of consecutive patients who received ocriplasmin for the treatment of vitreomacular adhesion at The George Washington University Department of Ophthalmology and the Virginia Retinal Center from January 1, 2013, to March 1, 2014, and who had at least 28 days of follow-up. Ellipsoid zone loss on optical coherence tomography was analyzed using the National Institutes of Health's Medical Imaging, Processing, Analysis, and Visualization (MIPAV) software. RESULTS: Ten patients received ocriplasmin injection. Three of the 10 patients (30%) had release of vitreomacular adhesion, and 8 of the 10 (80%) experienced vision loss within the first month. Average baseline visual acuity was 66 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters. Average visual acuity at Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 was 62, 43, 57, and 56 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters, respectively. Average final visual acuity was 58 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters. Ellipsoid loss occurred in 5 patients and reached a nadir (-36.9% decrease from baseline) 2 weeks later. CONCLUSION: Vision loss after ocriplasmin occurred in the majority of patients and was correlated with loss of the ellipsoid layer on optical coherence tomography. More data are needed to analyze this side effect.

Safety profile of ocriplasmin for the pharmacologic treatment of symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion/traction.

PURPOSE: To report the safety of intravitreal ocriplasmin injection based on 2 Phase 3 clinical trials in patients with symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion/vitreomacular traction, including when associated with full-thickness macular holes. METHODS: Safety analyses were based on 2 completed Phase 3 studies assessing intravitreal ocriplasmin injection. Adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and suspected adverse drug reactions are reported. The authors also report AEs of special interest from 8 other completed Phase 2 studies and 2 ongoing studies. RESULTS: A total of 465 eyes were injected with ocriplasmin (125 µg), and 187 eyes were treated with placebo injection in Phase 3 studies. Overall AE rate was 69.0% in the placebo group and 76.6% for ocriplasmin-treated patients. Most AEs were in the study eye, mild or moderate in severity, and transient. All suspected adverse drug reactions were ocular; the majority was nonserious, of mild intensity, and transient. CONCLUSION: Intravitreal ocriplasmin injection provides a generally well-tolerated pharmacologic treatment option for patients with symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion/vitreomacular traction, including when associated with full-thickness macular holes ≤400 µm in diameter.

Improved efficacy of ocriplasmin for vitreomacular traction release and transient changes in optic disk morphology.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of ocriplasmin for vitreomacular traction (VMT) resolution and to study changes in optic disk and peripapillary region. METHODS: Retrospective, single-center, observational case series. In 38 eyes with VMT (10 with concomitant full-thickness macular hole), determined by optical coherence tomography, a single intravitreal injection of ocriplasmin was administered. Baseline ocular characteristics included the presence/absence of epiretinal membrane, lens status, and vitreomacular adhesion size. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography and Heidelberg retinal tomography were performed at baseline and follow-up visits. RESULTS: A total of 71.1% of eyes treated with ocriplasmin had VMT resolution, improving to 83.9% after applying MIVI-TRUST selection criteria. A total of 90% of eyes with full-thickness macular hole showed VMT resolution, with 40% of those achieving full-thickness macular hole closure. Subretinal fluid in the macular region was observed in 36.8% of eyes 1 day after injection, and all cleared spontaneously by Day 42. A significant difference was observed in cup/disk area ratio between patients who achieved VMT resolution and patients who did not. CONCLUSION: Careful patient selection improves ocriplasmin efficacy. Transient optic disk morphology changes such as decreased cup/disk area ratio may occur in patients without VMT resolution.

Association between anatomical resolution and functional outcomes in the mivi-trust studies using ocriplasmin to treat symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion/vitreomacular traction, including when associated with macular hole.

PURPOSE: To evaluate visual function in patients with symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion (VMA)/vitreomacular traction including when associated with macular hole after ocriplasmin treatment, and the association between resolution of the underlying condition and improvement in visual function. METHODS: Six hundred and fifty-two patients from 2 Phase 3 trials received a single intravitreal injection of ocriplasmin 125 µg (n = 464) or placebo (n = 188). Mean and categorical changes from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity and 25-item Visual Function Questionnaire scores were used to evaluate visual function. Subgroups with VMA resolution and full-thickness macular hole closure were compared. RESULTS: Overall, 42% of patients who achieved VMA resolution at Day 28 had a ≥2-line improvement in best-corrected visual acuity at Month 6, and 20% had a ≥3-line improvement. Likewise, 69% of patients with nonsurgical full-thickness macular hole closure at Day 28 had a ≥2-line improvement at Month 6, and 48% had a ≥3-line best-corrected visual acuity improvement. Mean improvements in 25-item Visual Function Questionnaire scores were associated with achieving VMA resolution and nonsurgical full-thickness macular hole closure. CONCLUSION: In patients with symptomatic VMA/vitreomacular traction, VMA resolution and nonsurgical full-thickness macular hole closure were each associated with improvements in visual function. Resolving the underlying anatomical condition in symptomatic VMA/vitreomacular traction will increase the probability of achieving a clinically meaningful improvement in visual function.

SAFETY PROFILE OF OCRIPLASMIN FOR SYMPTOMATIC VITREOMACULAR ADHESION: A Comprehensive Analysis of Premarketing and Postmarketing Experiences.

PURPOSE: After the recent approval of ocriplasmin by the Food and Drug Administration, postmarketing safety concerns have been raised by the vitreoretinal community. The American Society of Retina Specialists Therapeutic Surveillance Committee was commissioned to monitor postmarketing drug-related and device-related adverse events. The purpose of this report is to analyze the postmarketing safety experience in the context of available premarketing safety data. METHODS: Periodic aggregate safety reports consisting of premarketing, or clinical trial, data (n = 999 injections) and postmarketing reports through July 16, 2013 (n = 4,387 injections), were retrospectively analyzed by the TSC. The aggregate data were analyzed to classify adverse events, and the postmarketing safety data for each event type were compared with the premarketing data. RESULTS: Eight categories of adverse events were identified. Acute reduction in visual acuity attributable to either worsening of macular pathology or development of subretinal fluid, electroretinogram changes, dyschromatopsia, retinal tears and detachments, lens subluxation or phacodonesis, impaired pupillary reflex, and retinal vessel findings were reported in both the premarketing and postmarketing experiences. Ellipsoid zone (inner segment/outer segment) findings were only reported in the postmarketing experience. Rates of postmarketing reports were lower than in the premarketing data. Adverse events were generally transient, and characteristics of these adverse events were generally similar between the premarketing and postmarketing experience. CONCLUSION: Postmarket analyses are limited by significant underreporting, and in the case of ocriplasmin as a first in-class drug, they may not have captured safety events that have only more recently been identified. Nonetheless, postmarket analyses can identify the scope of potential safety events based on real-world experiences. Ocriplasmin administration should be guided by an appropriate and informed risk-benefit discussion with the patient. Ongoing active postmarket surveillance by all practitioners will continue to be critical to better understand this safety profile.

[Clinical evaluation of ocriplasmin as a vitreolytic agent].

Incomplete perifoveal posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) associated with abnormal vitreomacular adhesion (VMA) can cause vitreomacular traction (VMT) and macular hole (MH) formation, which require vitrectomy treatment. Pharmacologic vitreolysis, which is intravitreal injection with vitreolytic enzymes to resolve VMA, may be used as an alternative therapy.Ocriplasmin, formerly known as microplasmin, is a recombinant truncated form of plasmin with proteolytic activity against fibronectin and laminin.It was recently approved for VMA treatment in the European Union and USA. Phase III studies indicated that ocriplasmin injection was a safe and effective treatment for selected cases of symptomatic VMA and MH. VMA release was achieved in 26.5% of ocriplasmin-injected eyes versus 10.1% of the placebo group. MH closure was achieved in 40.6% as compared with 10.6% of the placebo group.In comparison with the outcome after vitrectomy, the success rate of ocriplasmin was still far below expectation. Ocular adverse events included vitreous floaters, photopsia and profound visual decline. Its efficacy and safety need to be further evaluated in more clinical trials.

Ocriplasmin for pharmacologic vitreolysis.

The vitreous may play an important role in the pathogenesis of various retinal disorders. Pharmacologic vitreolysis uses intravitreal pharmacologic agents to provide liquefaction of the vitreous and complete vitreoretinal separation. Ocriplasmin, a genetically engineered version of plasmin, has been shown in clinical trials to be able to safely release vitreomacular adhesion and close Stage 2 macular holes in a significant number of patients. Advancements in the development of this safe and effective method of vitreolysis have provided an alternative, nonsurgical treatment option to physicians who manage these patients. A roundtable of clinical investigators convened to discuss and summarize recent progress in pharmacologic vitreolysis. Preclinical studies, and efficacy and safety data from controlled clinical trials of ocriplasmin were presented and discussed. Case studies were then presented to provide an opportunity for experts to reveal their specific thoughts regarding ocriplasmin for the treatment of vitreomacular adhesion and resulting vitreomacular traction and macular holes, based on their own interpretation of current clinical data and experience.

The efficacy and safety of ocriplasmin for patients with vitreous macular traction.

PURPOSE: To estimate the efficacy and safety of ocriplasmin for patients with vitreous macular traction (VMT). METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE and Ovid were searched up to May 2020 to identify related studies. Statistical analysis was conducted by R software version 3.6.3. Results in proportion with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated by means of Freeman-Tukey variant of arcsine square transformation. RESULTS: The pooling results indicated the overall complete release rate was 50% (95% CI [45%-54%]). For VMT patients younger than 65 years old, with smaller adhesion size of VMT (<1500 µm), phakic eyes, with macular hole (MH) and subretinal fluid (SRF), while without epiretinal membrane (ERM), ocriplasmin could achieve much higher complete release rates than those under opposite conditions. The general nonsurgical closure rate of MH was 34% (95% CI [30%-37%]), and it was positively correlated with the MH size. The visual improvement rate was 45% (95% CI [32%-59%]), and it was higher for patients with VMT resolution (59%, 95% CI [41%-75%]). The secondary pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) rate for patients without MH closure or VMT resolution was about 31% (95% CI [23%-39%]). The incidence of MH progression was 10% (95% CI [4%-18%]), and other severe adverse events such as endophthalmitis, retinal detachment and retinal tear were relatively rare. CONCLUSION: Ocriplasmin is an effective, reliable and relatively safe intervention for the treatment of VMT. The most suitable candidates were patients younger than 65 years old, with smaller adhesion size (<1500 µm), phakic eyes, with MH and SRF, while without ERM.

Plasmin drives burn-induced systemic inflammatory response syndrome.

Severe injuries, such as burns, provoke a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) that imposes pathology on all organs. Simultaneously, severe injury also elicits activation of the fibrinolytic protease plasmin. While the principal adverse outcome of plasmin activation in severe injury is compromised hemostasis, plasmin also possesses proinflammatory properties. We hypothesized that, following a severe injury, early activation of plasmin drives SIRS. Plasmin activation was measured and related to injury severity, SIRS, coagulopathy, and outcomes prospectively in burn patients who are not at risk of hemorrhage. Patients exhibited early, significant activation of plasmin that correlated with burn severity, cytokines, coagulopathy, and death. Burn with a concomitant, remote muscle injury was employed in mice to determine the role of plasmin in the cytokine storm and inflammatory cascades in injured tissue distant from the burn injury. Genetic and pharmacologic inhibition of plasmin reduced the burn-induced cytokine storm and inflammatory signaling in injured tissue. These findings demonstrate (a) that severe injury-induced plasmin activation is a key pathologic component of the SIRS-driven cytokine storm and SIRS-activated inflammatory cascades in tissues distant from the inciting injury and (b) that targeted inhibition of plasmin activation may be effective for limiting both hemorrhage and tissue-damaging inflammation following injury.

Engineering of Ocriplasmin Variants by Bioinformatics Methods for the Reduction of Proteolytic and Autolytic Activities.

Background: Ocriplasmin has been developed for the induction of posterior vitreous detachment in patients with vitreomacular adhesion. At physiological pH, ocriplasmin is susceptible to autolytic and proteolytic degradation, limiting its activity duration. These undesirable properties of ocriplasmin can be reduced by site-directed mutagenesis, so that its enzymatic activities can be augmented. This study aimed to design ocriplasmin variants with improved biological/physicochemical characteristics via bioinformatics tools. Methods: This study was performed in Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran, 2019. Through site-directed mutagenesis, three ocriplasmin variants were designed. Structural analysis was performed on the wild-type variant and the mutant variants using the Protein Interactions Calculator (PIC) server. The interactions between the S-2403 substrate and the ocriplasmin variants were studied by molecular docking simulations, and binding capability was evaluated by the calculation of free binding energy. The conformational features of protein-substrate complex systems for all the variants were evaluated using molecular dynamic simulations at 100 nanoseconds. Results: The structural analysis of ocriplasmin revealed that the substitution of threonine for alanine 59 significantly reduced proteolytic activity, while the substitution of glutamic acid for lysine 156 influenced autolytic function. The molecular docking simulation results indicated the appropriate binding of the substrate to the ocriplasmin variants with high-to-low affinities. The binding affinity of the wild-type variant for the substrate was higher than that between the mutant variants and the substrate. Simulation analyses, consisting of the root-mean-square deviation, the root-mean-square fluctuation, and the center-of-mass average distance showed a higher affinity of the substrate for the wild type than for the mutant variants. Conclusion: The mutational analysis of ocriplasmin revealed that A59T and K156E mutagenesis could be used for the development of a new variant with higher therapeutic efficacy.

[Retinal detachment after intravitreal ocriplasmin injection]. / Ablatio retinae nach intravitrealer Ocriplasmin-Injektion.

After an uneventful intravitreal injection (IVI) of Ocriplasmin in a patient with reduced visual acuity due to vitreomacular traction (VMT) and a small macular hole, retinal detachment occurred within a few days after the operation. Although retinal detachment is known as a risk factor of IVI this case is noteworthy: an excessive reaction occurred in the region of the vitreous body, which resulted in the development of severe traction on the retina leading to a posterior vitreous body detachment, retinal holes and complete retinal detachment. This possible complication should be discussed in the preoperative patient informed consent and the reason for this excessive reaction should be the subject of further investigations.