Nutritional aspects in patients with gastroparesis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review was to highlight most recent updates on nutritional aspects in gastroparesis (GP) focusing on dietary recommendations, utilization of enteral and parenteral nutrition, endoscopic and surgical interventions. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent data addressed eating patterns, nutritional interventions, and clarifications on the role of endoscopic and surgical interventions underlying an impact on nutritional management of GP patients. They support the importance of gastroparesis-specific diet in addition to drug therapy, and confirm the benefits of a modified low-fat, low-fiber diet. Current guidelines suggest a new approach to GP management based on predominant symptoms. Gastric peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (G-POEM) and surgical gastric electrical stimulator (GES) placement may be considered in individuals with nausea and vomiting before the need for jejunostomy tube placement for enteral feeding or parenteral nutrition. SUMMARY: Current literature supports the importance of dietary interventions, focusing on low-fat and low-fiber diets, in addition to drug therapies. Severely fiber-restrictive diets may not be necessary. There is enhanced understanding when jejunal feeding should be incorporated for refractory cases with consideration of G-POEM or/and GES even before jejunal tube placement. This approach will require patient evaluation in specialized motility centers.

Nutritional Assessment in Patients after Gastric Electrical Stimulation (GES).

BACKGROUND: Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is used for patients with drug-refractory gastroparesis (Gp) symptoms. Approximately two-thirds of patients with Gp symptoms are either overweight or obese. We aimed to assess symptoms and nutritional status pre-GES and post-GES placement in a large sample of drug-refractory Gp patients. METHODS: We conducted a chart review of 282 patients with drug-refractory Gp who received temporary followed by permanent GES at an academic medical center. Gastrointestinal symptoms were collected by a traditional standardized PRO (0-4, 0 being asymptomatic and 4 being worst symptoms), baseline nutritional status by BMI plus subjective global assessment (SGA score A, B, C, for mild, moderate, and severe nutritional deficits), ability to tolerate diet, enteral tube access, and parenteral therapy were assessed at baseline and after permanent GES placement. RESULTS: Comparing baseline with permanent, GES was found to significantly improve upper GI symptoms in all quartiles. Of the 282 patients with baseline body mass index (BMI) information, 112 (40%) patients were severely malnourished at baseline, of which 36 (32%) patients' nutritional status improved after GES. Among all patients, 76 (68%) patients' nutritional status remained unchanged. Many patients with high BMI were malnourished by SGA. CONCLUSION: We conclude that symptomatic patients of different BMIs showed improvement in their GI symptoms irrespective of baseline nutritional status. Severely malnourished patients were found to have an improvement in their nutritional status after GES therapy. We conclude that BMI, even if high, is not by itself a contraindication for GES therapy for symptomatic patients.

Addition of pyloroplasty may improve glycemic control and refractory early satiety in gastroparesis at rates similar to gastric neurostimulation alone: a retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Gastroparesis that is refractory to standard dietary and medical management may benefit from surgical treatment with gastric electrical neurostimulation, which has shown promise in reducing symptoms of the disease. Pyloroplasty may serve an adjunctive role to a gastric stimulator, but the precise benefit remains unclear. The present study compares reported rates of symptom improvement following gastric neurostimulator implantation with and without pyloroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single center retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who received operative management for symptom refractory gastroparesis from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2021 was performed. Subjects were assigned to cohorts based on treatment with gastric electrical stimulation alone (GES-only) or combined with pyloroplasty (GES + PP). A survey-based assessment was administered post-operatively that evaluated cardinal symptoms of gastroparesis (nausea, vomiting, early satiety) before and after treatment. RESULTS: In total, 42 patients (15 GES-only, 27 GES + PP) were included in the study. Both groups reported a high degree of improvement in global symptom control following surgery (93% vs 81%) with no differences between treatment cohorts (p = 0.09). Early satiety demonstrated better improvement in patients who received gastric stimulation alone (p = 0.012). Subgroup analysis of diabetic gastroparesis patients showed a 2.2% decrease in hemoglobin A1c levels in the GES + PP group (p-0.034). CONCLUSIONS: Symptom reduction in refractory gastroparesis appears to improve after placement of a gastric neurostimulator with or without the addition of a pyloroplasty procedure.

Difference in Cyclic Versus Non-cyclic Symptom Patterns in Patients with the Symptoms of Gastroparesis Undergoing Bioelectric Therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with gastroparesis (Gp) have symptoms with or without a cyclic pattern. This retrospective study evaluates differences in cyclic vs. non-cyclic symptoms of Gp by analyzing mucosal electrogastrogram (mEG), familial dysautonomias, and response to gastric stimulation. METHODS: 37 patients with drug refractory Gp, 7 male and 30 female, with a mean age of 41.4 years, were studied. 18 had diabetes mellitus, 25 had cyclic (Cyc), and 12 had a non-cyclic (NoCyc) pattern of symptoms. Patients underwent temporary mucosal gastric stimulator (tGES) placement, which was done as a trial before permanent stimulator (GES) placement. Electrogastrogram (EGG) by mucosal (mEG) measures, including frequency, amplitude, and frequency-amplitude ratio (FAR), were pre- and post-tGES. Patients' history of personal and familial dysautonomias, quality of life, and symptom scores were recorded. Baseline vs. follow-ups were compared by paired t tests and McNemar's tests. T tests contrasted symptom scores, gastric emptying tests (GET), and mEG measures, while chi-squared tests deciphered comorbidity differences between two groups and univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: There were significantly more patients with diabetes in the Cyc group vs. the NoCyc group. Using a 1 point in symptom outcome, 18 patients did not improve and 19 did improve with tGES. Using univariable analysis, with the cyclic pattern as a predictor, patients exhibiting a cyclic pattern had an odds ratio of 0.22 (95% CI 0.05-0.81, p = 0.054) for achieving an improvement of at least one unit in vomiting at follow-up from baseline. The mucosal electrogastrogram frequency to amplitude ratio (FAR) for the "not Improved" group was 19.6 [3.5, 33.6], whereas, for the "Improved" group, it was 54.3 [25.6, 72.5] with a p-value of 0.049. For multivariate logistic regression, accounting for sex and age squared, patients exhibiting a cyclic pattern had an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 0.16 (95% CI 0.03-0.81, p = 0.027) for achieving an improvement of at least one unit in vomiting at follow-up from baseline. The two groups had no significant differences in the personal or inherited history of investigated familial patterns. CONCLUSION: This study shows differences in Gp patients with Cyc vs. NoCyc symptoms in several areas. Larger studies are needed to elicit further differences between the two groups about cycles of symptoms, EGG, findings, familial patterns, and response to mucosal GES.

[Management of gastroparesis care in Germany - a survey by the working group of guiding gastroenterologic clinicians (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitender Gastroenterologischer Krankenhausärzte, ALGK)]. / Versorgungsrealität der Gastroparese in Deutschland ­ eine Umfrage der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitender Gastroenterologischer Krankenhausärzte (ALGK).

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of gastroparesis can be difficult in everyday clinical practice. The aim of this anonymous survey of members of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitender Gastroenterologischer Krankenhausärzte e.V. (ALGK) was to investigate the management of gastroparesis care in Germany. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The ALGK conducted a member survey using a standardized anonymous questionnaire including 11 questions from 14.04.2023 to 29.04.2023. The questions covered diagnostic and therapeutic procedures as well as various aspects of the management of gastroparesis. RESULTS: The response rate was 21.4% (62 members). Only 6.56% of all respondents assessed the prevalence of gastroparesis correctly as estimated by current epidemiological publications. 68.85 % of all respondents used gastric emptying scintigraphy for diagnosis. 51.61% regarded an individualized therapy as the most important treatment goal, taking into account etiology and impact of symptoms, compared to symptomatic treatment of leading clinical symptom in 43,55 %. First choice treatment was medical treatment in 41.94%, dietary recommendations in 27.42% and endoscopic interventions in 24.2%. 100% of respondents used prokinetics, 40.32% used antiemetics while only 4.84% used analgesics. Insufficient availability of medical treatment options represents a need of action for 85.48%, compared to lacking official approval of available drugs for this indication for 48,39% of all respondents. Treatment options with little evidence were used quite frequently (e.g. use of herbal therapies in 43.55%). DISCUSSION: Overall, the frequency of gastroparesis was underestimated in the current survey. Endoscopic options are quite often used as first-line treatment. Although symptom-guided treatment is important for the majority of respondents, prokinetics are predominantly used.

A gluco-mindful approach to diabetic gastroparesis.

Diabetes gastroparesis is a common manifestation of autonomic neuropathy in persons with long-standing, uncontrolled diabetes. Most discussion about its management revolves around the mitigation of symptoms. Here, we share tips on choosing the right glucose-lowering medication, based upon predominant symptomatology of gastroparesis. We highlight about insulin preparations, and their timing of administration, can be tailored according to need. We also emphasize the need to choose oral glucose lowering drugs with care.

[An update on gastroparesis in 2024]. / Le point sur la gastroparésie en 2024.

Gastroparesis is a pathology associating upper digestive symptoms, such as nausea and vomiting, with impaired gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical gastric or duodenal obstruction. It has a major impact on patients' quality of life, can lead to undernutrition, and -increases overall mortality. Several schools of thought converge on the hypothesis of a clinico--pathological spectrum of gastric neuro-muscular dysfunction encompassing gastroparesis and functional dyspepsia, in particular the subtype known as "postprandial distress syndrome". Its management includes non--pharmacological interventions, such as hygienic--dietary measures, pharmacological interventions using prokinetic, antiemetic or neuromodulatory treatments, and endoscopic interventions.

La gastroparésie est une pathologie associant des symptômes ­digestifs hauts, tels que des nausées et des vomissements, à un défaut de la vidange gastrique en l'absence d'une obstruction ­mécanique gastrique ou duodénale. Elle a un fort retentissement sur la qualité de vie des patients, peut amener à la dénutrition et augmente globalement la mortalité. Plusieurs courants de pensée convergent vers l'hypothèse d'un spectre clinicopathologique de dysfonction neuromusculaire gastrique englobant la gastroparésie et la dyspepsie fonctionnelle, notamment du sous-­type appelé « syndrome de détresse postprandiale ¼. Sa prise en charge ­comprend des interventions non pharmacologiques, telles que des mesures hygiénodiététiques, des interventions pharmacologiques à l'aide de traitements procinétiques, anti­émétiques ou encore neuromodulateurs, et des interventions ­endoscopiques.

[Diabetic gastroparesis and type 1 diabetes]. / Gastroparésie diabétique et diabète de type 1.

Gastroparesis is a rare and late microvascular complication, but a significant one of diabetes. Defined by a slowing of gastric emptying, this condition manifests with nonspecific gastrointestinal symptoms, including nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, postprandial fullness, and early satiety. Faced with such a clinical presentation, it is often challenging to diagnose gastroparesis. In this article, we discuss the diagnostic procedures, as well as therapeutic approaches and management of the disease.

La gastroparésie est une complication microvasculaire rare et tardive, mais conséquente, du diabète. Définie par un ralentissement de la vidange gastrique, cette pathologie se présente sous la forme de symptômes gastro-intestinaux aspécifiques incluant des nausées, des vomissements, des douleurs abdominales, une sensation de réplétion postprandiale et une satiété précoce. Face à une présentation clinique de ce type, il est souvent difficile de poser le diagnostic de gastroparésie. Dans cet article, nous évoquons donc les examens complémentaires permettant de poser le diagnostic, ainsi que les propositions thérapeutiques et la prise en charge de la maladie.

Gastroparesis.

Gastroparesis is characterized by symptoms suggestive of, and objective evidence of, delayed gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical obstruction. This review addresses the normal emptying of solids and liquids from the stomach and details the myogenic and neuromuscular control mechanisms, including the specialized function of the pyloric sphincter, that result in normal emptying, based predominantly on animal research. A clear understanding of fundamental mechanisms is necessary to comprehend derangements leading to gastroparesis, and additional research on human gastric muscles is needed. The section on pathophysiology of gastroparesis considers neuromuscular diseases that affect nonsphincteric gastric muscle, disorders of the extrinsic neural control, and pyloric dysfunction that lead to gastroparesis. The potential cellular basis for gastroparesis is attributed to the effects of oxidative stress and inflammation, with increased pro-inflammatory and decreased resident macrophages, as observed in full-thickness biopsies from patients with gastroparesis. Predominant diagnostic tests involving measurements of gastric emptying, the use of a functional luminal imaging probe, and high-resolution antral duodenal manometry in characterizing the abnormal motor functions at the gastroduodenal junction are discussed. Management is based on supporting nutrition; dietary interventions, including the physical reduction in particle size of solid foods; pharmacological agents, including prokinetics and anti-emetics; and interventions such as gastric electrical stimulation and pyloromyotomy. These are discussed briefly, and comment is added on the potential for individualized treatments in the future, based on optimal gastric emptying measurement and objective documentation of the underlying pathophysiology causing the gastroparesis.

Epidemiology and Healthcare Utilization in Patients With Gastroparesis: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The authors performed a systematic review of epidemiologic data to understand the prevalence, incidence, etiologies, and hospitalizations related to gastroparesis (GP). METHODS: Studies of the epidemiology of GP published in all languages, years, and countries from 5 databases in January 2022 were studied using prespecified search strategies. RESULTS: Thirteen studies (data from 1994 to 2019) were included. All but one study (from the United Kingdom) were based in the United States. Prevalence of definite GP (symptoms plus delayed gastric emptying) ranged from 13.8 to 267.7 per 100,000 adults, and incidence was 1.9-6.3 per 100,000 person-years. The estimated 10-year cumulative incidence of GP in type 1 diabetes (DM) and type 2 DM was 5.2% and 1.0%, respectively. Across studies, GP was more common among female patients and those with DM. Rates of hospitalizations and emergency department visits for GP are increasing, ranging from 2- to 18-fold over approximately 2 decades. Mortality rates for patients with possible or definite GP were higher compared with the general population, with primary causes of death in GP being cardiovascular, respiratory failure, and malignancy. Multiple studies observed improved inpatient mortality over the mid-1990s to late 2000s. Limitations include the case identification in most studies (76.9%) used solely International Classification of Diseases codes or clinical record diagnoses; 2 studies (15.4%) used objective evaluation to diagnose GP. Only 4 studies (30.8%) used non-specialized community databases; the remaining 9 studies used inpatient, emergency department, or disease-specific databases. CONCLUSIONS: There is a paucity of high-quality, demographically diverse, and population-based studies to accurately describe the epidemiology of GP. Future studies with valid gastric emptying measurement are needed to better characterize the epidemiology and natural history of GP.

Epidemiology, Etiology, and Treatment of Gastroparesis: Real-World Evidence From a Large US National Claims Database.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Although gastroparesis carries a considerable health care and patient burden, associated epidemiological data are limited. To provide new real-world evidence for gastroparesis, we estimated disease prevalence, and investigated patient demographics and disease etiology in a large US claims database. METHODS: This retrospective, cross-sectional analysis used de-identified, longitudinal patient-level enrollment and billing data for adults from the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart database, a large US national administrative health insurance claims database. Prevalence was age-, sex-, and geographical region-standardized using the 2018 US census. Descriptive analyses of demographic and clinical variables and underlying disease etiologies were performed. RESULTS: The overall standardized prevalence of gastroparesis was 267.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] 264.8-270.7) per 100,000 US adults, whereas prevalence of "definite" gastroparesis (individuals diagnosed within 3 months of gastric emptying scintigraphy testing with persistent symptoms for more than 3 months) was 21.5 (95% CI 20.6-22.4) per 100,000 persons. Patients with gastroparesis had an overall Charlson Comorbidity Index score of 4.2, indicating substantial comorbidity burden. The most frequently documented comorbidities were chronic pulmonary disease (46.4%), diabetes with chronic complication (37.3%), and peripheral vascular disease (30.4%). Patients most commonly had a diabetic etiology (57.4%; type 1, 5.7% and type 2, 51.7%), followed by postsurgical (15.0%), drug-induced (11.8%), and idiopathic (11.3%) etiologies. CONCLUSIONS: New evidence is provided regarding the prevalence, patient demographics, and etiology of gastroparesis in the US general population. Wider availability of reliable objective gastric emptying measures and further education of medical professionals in recognizing and diagnosing gastroparesis would benefit future studies and improve understanding of disease epidemiology.

Gastroparesis: time for a paradigm change.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Gastroparesis (GP) is a syndrome defined by symptoms and delayed gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical obstruction. Typical symptoms include nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and early satiety. Only one medication is currently FDA-approved for the treatment of GP. This review highlights recent research findings pertaining to GP and provides evidence to support a change in the current GP diagnostic and treatment paradigm. RECENT FINDINGS: An analysis of GP trials over the past four decades demonstrates the power of placebo and the need to perform longer studies with clearly defined patient populations. Two studies highlight the need to evaluate patients with suspected GP carefully and to perform gastric emptying studies properly. The misdiagnosis of GP symptoms is reviewed, preceded by a discussion of whether GP should be considered a disorder of gut-brain interaction. Finally, new data on therapies that target the pylorus are highlighted. SUMMARY: Gastroparesis is frequently over-diagnosed and incorrectly diagnosed. Performing a proper gastric emptying study which adheres to standard protocol, and accurately interpreting the results in the context of the individual patient, are critical to making an accurate diagnosis of GP. The treatment paradigm needs to shift from simply aiming to accelerate gastric emptying to treating global symptoms of a chronic syndrome that may represent gut-brain dysfunction in many patients.

Baseline Characteristics and Predictive Factors of Intravenous Immunoglobulin Response in Drug and Device Refractory Gastroparesis Symptoms.

INTRODUCTION: Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) has been shown in a small pilot series to be helpful for some patients with gastroparesis that is refractory to drugs, devices, and surgical therapies. Many but not all patients have serologic neuromuscular markers. We hypothesize that those patients with serologic markers and/or longer duration of therapy would have better responses to IVIG. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 47 patients with a diagnosis of gastroparesis and gastroparesis-like syndrome that had all failed previous therapies including available and investigational drugs, devices, and/or pyloric therapies. Patients had a standardized 12-week course of IVIG, dosed as 400 mg/kg per week intravenously. Symptom assessment was done with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) compliant traditional patient-reported outcomes. Success to IVIG was defined as 20% or greater reduction in average symptom scores from baseline to the latest evaluation. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (30%) had a response, and 33 (70%) had no response per our definition. Patients responding had a higher glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 positivity (64% vs. 30%, P =0.049, missing=3) and longer duration of therapy (>12 wk/continuous: 86% vs. 48%, P =0.09). CONCLUSIONS: In this moderately sized open-label series of refractory patients with gastroparesis symptoms treated with IVIG, 30% of patients responded. While serologic markers and extended therapies show a trend to greater response, neither was statistically significant, except for glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 which showed a higher positivity rate in responders. We conclude that a clinical trial of IVIG may be warranted in severely refractory patients with gastroparesis symptoms.

Gastroparesis and Gastroparesis Syndromes as Neuromuscular Disorders.

Gastroparesis syndromes (GpS) are a spectrum of disorders presenting with characteristic symptoms increasingly recognized as being gastrointestinal (GI) neuromuscular disorders (NMDs). This review focuses on GpS as a manifestation of neurologic disorders of GI NMD. GpS can be associated with systemic abnormalities, including inflammatory, metabolic, and serologic disorders, as well as autoimmune antibodies via nerve and muscle targets in the GI tract, which can be treated with immunotherapy, such as intravenous immunoglobulin. GpS are associated with autonomic (ANS) and enteric (ENS) dysfunction. Disorders of ANS may interact with the ENS and are the subject of continued investigation. ENS disorders have been recognized for a century but have only recently begun to be fully quantified. Anatomic structural changes in the GI tract are increasingly recognized in GpS. Detailed descriptions of anatomic changes in GpS, and their correlation with physiologic findings, have opened a new era of investigation. The management of GpS, when viewed as GI NMD, has shifted the paradigms of both diagnosis and treatment. This article concludes with current approaches to GpS directed at underlying neuromuscular pathology.

Trends in Gastroparesis Management: A United States Population-based Study From 2010 to 2020.

BACKGROUND: There is little consensus on the medical management of gastroparesis, a disorder characterized by delayed gastric emptying with symptoms of early satiety, nausea, vomiting, and upper abdominal pain. GOALS: We utilized population-level data to: (1) describe the prevalence of different pharmacological and nonpharmacological therapies in patients with gastroparesis; and (2) trend the prevalence of these therapies from 2010 to 2020. STUDY: More than 59 million unique medical records across 26 US-based major health care systems were surveyed using the Explorys platform to identify a cohort of adults with gastroparesis who completed both a gastric emptying study and upper endoscopy or upper gastrointestinal tract imaging. Prevalence of antiemetic, prokinetic, neuromodulator prescriptions, and surgical therapies for gastroparesis were searched within this cohort and trended annually from 2010 to 2020. RESULTS: Antiemetics (72% of patients), prokinetics (47%), and neuromodulators (75% of patients, 44% of patients without a concomitant psychiatric or diabetic peripheral neuropathy diagnosis) were all commonly used in the treatment of patients with gastroparesis. From 2010 to 2020, there was an increase in the prevalence of antiemetic and neuromodulator prescriptions (36.4% to 57.6%, P <0.001 and 47.0% to 66.9%, P <0.001, respectively), whereas the prevalence of prokinetics remained relatively constant (31.8% to 31.6%, P =0.52). Procedural and surgical treatments were used in 5% of gastroparesis patients. CONCLUSIONS: Treatments for gastroparesis have changed over the last decade: antiemetic and neuromodulator use has increased whereas prokinetic use has remained constant. This practice pattern may reflect the growing number and availability of antiemetics and neuromodulators and the small number and known side effects of prokinetics.

Factors Affecting Delayed Gastric Emptying and Long-Term Outcomes of Children With Gastric Emptying.

OBJECTIVES: Our study attempted to identify what factors best predict for delayed gastric emptying (DGE) and whether children respond to treatment. METHODS: Children aged between 0 and 18 were included who had a gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES) study performed between 2009 and 2018. Baseline clinical details were recorded from clinic visit records regarding symptoms, medication, and past medical history. Results were analyzed using multivariate regression analysis and coefficient analysis. Children were followed up at 2 years to assess their symptoms and medication usage. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty-five children were included in the study of which 174 demonstrated DGE. All children had symptoms prior to GES, the most common symptom being that of vomiting and reflux symptoms which were present in over 90% of patients; other common symptoms like abdominal pain and nausea were seen commonly in around 30%. A genetic disorder and prior surgery were more common in children with DGE but there was no difference in presenting symptoms between normal and DGE groups. Regression analysis showed prior surgery and particularly prior abdominal surgery predicted for DGE and additionally predicted for those with highly DGE. Improvement in symptoms and reduction in medication usage was seen after 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides one of the largest data sets looking at DGE in children. Prior surgery was found to be a key factor in predicting for highly DGE. Symptoms and medication usage did significantly reduce substantially after 2 years.

Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound at ST36 improves the gastric motility by TNF-α/IKKß/NF-κB signaling pathway in diabetic rats.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) can effectively regulate the central and peripheral nervous system. However, whether LIPUS could act on acupuncture points to modulate the activity of peripheral nervous has rarely been studied. Our study aimed to investigate whether LIPUS at ST36 could improve gastric emptying in diabetic gastroparesis rats. METHODS: Sprague-Dawley male rats were divided into three groups: control group (CON), diabetic gastroparesis group (DM), and diabetic gastroparesis LIPUS treated group (LIPUS). The body weight and blood glucose were recorded every week. Glucose tolerance, gastric emptying rate, and gastric motility were measured before and after treatment. Gastric motility was assessed by ultrasonic examination and Muscle strip experiment. The expression level of c-Kit was assessed by immunohistochemistry staining. Levels of TNF-α, p-NF-κB p-65, NF-κB p-65, and p-IKKß, IKKß were measured by western blot. RESULTS: We reported LIPUS at an intensity of 0.88 W/cm2 exhibited significant differences in functional recovery of gastric delayed emptying in diabetic rats. Through ultrasound gastric motility functional testing and analysis of gastric antral smooth muscle strips indirectly and directly proved the effectiveness of LIPUS for the recovery of gastric delayed emptying. Pathological analysis and western blot indicated that the mechanism by which LIPUS applied to ST36 improved gastric motility may be partially attributed to the inhibition of the TNF-α/IKKß/NF-κB signaling pathway, thereby rescuing the damaged interstitial cells of Cajal network. CONCLUSION: LIPUS at ST36 improved the gastric motility and rescued the damaged networks of interstitial cells of Cajal. LIPUS may have a promising therapeutic potential for diabetic gastroparesis.

Reconsideration of the Gastroparetic Syndrome.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Gastroparesis is a chronic disorder characterized by a constellation of foregut symptoms, including postprandial nausea, vomiting, distension, epigastric pain, and regurgitation in the absence of gastric outlet obstruction. Despite considerable research over the past decades, there remains to be only nominal understanding of disease classification, diagnostic criteria, pathogenesis, and preferred therapy. RECENT FINDINGS: We critically reassess current approaches for disease identification and stratification, theories of causation, and treatment for gastroparesis. Gastric scintigraphy, long considered a diagnostic standard, has been re-evaluated in light of evidence showing low sensitivity, whereas newer testing modalities are incompletely validated. Present concepts of pathogenesis do not provide a unified model linking biological impairments with clinical manifestations, whereas available pharmacological and anatomical treatments lack explicit selection criteria or evidence for sustained effectiveness. We propose a disease model that embodies the re-programming of distributed neuro-immune interactions in the gastric wall by inflammatory perturbants. These interactions, combined with effects on the foregut hormonal milieu and brain-gut axis, are postulated to generate the syndromic attributes characteristically linked with gastroparesis. Research linking models of immunopathogenesis with diagnostic and therapeutic paradigms will lead to reclassifications of gastroparesis that guide future trials and technological developments. KEY POINTS: • The term gastroparesis embodies a heterogenous array of symptoms and clinical findings based on a complex assimilation of afferent and efferent mechanisms, gastrointestinal locations, and pathologies. • There currently exists no single test or group of tests with sufficient capacity to be termed a definitional standard for gastroparesis. • Present research regarding pathogenesis suggests the importance of immune regulation of intrinsic oscillatory activity involving myenteric nerves, interstitial cells of Cajal, and smooth muscle cells. • Prokinetic pharmaceuticals remain the mainstay of management, although novel treatments are being studied that are directed to alternative muscle/nerve receptors, electromodulation of the brain-gut axis, and anatomical (endoscopic, surgical) interventions.

Electroceuticals for Neurogastroenterology and Motility Disorders.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To provide an updated overview on use of electrostimulation in gastrointestinal motility disorders and obesity, with a focus on gastric electrical stimulation, vagal nerve stimulation and sacral nerve stimulation. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies on gastric electrical stimulation for chronic vomiting showed a decrease in frequency of vomiting, but without significant improvement in quality of life. Percutaneous vagal nerve stimulation shows some promise for both symptoms of gastroparesis and IBS. Sacral nerve stimulation does not appear effective for constipation. Studies of electroceuticals for treatment of obesity have quite varied results with less clinical penetrance of the technology. Results of studies on the efficacy of electroceuticals have been variable depending on pathology but this area remains promising. Improved mechanistic understanding, technology and more controlled trials will be helpful to establish a clearer role for electrostimulation in treatment of various GI disorders.

Gastric myoelectrical activity based AI-derived threshold predicts resolution of gastroparesis post-pyloric balloon dilation.

BACKGROUND: A patient subset with gastroparesis (GP) has normal gastric myoelectrical activity (GMA) and pyloric dysfunction. AIMS: (1) To determine pyloric balloon dilation (BD) effect on symptoms and gastric emptying in GP patients with normal 3 cycles per minute (cpm) GMA. (2) To demonstrate GMA-based artificial intelligence (AI)-derived formulae predict BD success at 10-12-month follow-up. METHODS: Cohort subjects completed baseline electrogastrogram w/water load satiety test (WLST), solid-phase nuclear gastric emptying, Gastrointestinal Cardinal Symptom Index (ANMS GCSI-DD) and Leeds questionnaires. Subjects were divided into two groups based on response to the WLST. Group 1 (n = 26) with hypernormal/normal 3 cpm GMA and Group 2 (n = 4) hyponormal/normal range 3 cpm GMA, compared to healthy normals. All subjects underwent endoscopic pyloric BD. After 10-12 months, gastric emptying and dyspepsia questionnaires were repeated to evaluate outcomes. RESULTS: Group 1 ANMS GCSI-DD scores improved from 2 points at baseline (BL) to 0 at follow-up (f/u) (p < 0.001); Group 2 ANMS GSCI-DD scores were 2 at BL and 1.6 at f/u (p = 0.25). Leeds scores improved (p < 0.001) only for Group 1. Group 1 gastric emptying improved (54.5% retained at 2 h at BL vs. 12.2% at f/u, p < 0.001) in contrast to Group 2 patients (51.25% at BL vs. 56.25% at f/u, p = 0.252). Percentage 3 cpm GMA decreased (41.1% at BL vs. 24.9% at f/u, p ≤ 0.005) in Group 1 versus Group 2 (15.3% at BL vs. 23.4% at f/u, p = 0.114). AI-derived GMA threshold (GMAT) of 0.59 predicted positive pyloric BD outcomes at 10-12 months with sensitivity 96%, specificity 75%, and 93% correct classification. CONCLUSIONS: Pyloric BD improved symptoms and gastric emptying long term in patients with GP and hypernormal/normal 3 cpm GMA. AI-derived GMAT predicted pyloric BD success. GMA post-WLST and GMAT are objective measures for improved selection and outcomes for endoscopic pyloric BD.