Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.106
Filtrar
Más filtros

Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 68(9): e0128123, 2024 Sep 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39082883

RESUMEN

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) relationships for efficacy were evaluated using data from omadacycline-treated patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) enrolled in two phase 3 studies. Patients received omadacycline 100 mg intravenously (IV) every 12 hours for two doses, followed by 100 mg IV every 24 hours (q24h), with the option to switch to 300 mg oral (PO) q24h after 3 days or 450 mg PO q24h for two doses, followed by 300 mg PO q24h for a total duration of 7-14 days. Clinical response was evaluated at 48-72 hours [early clinical response (ECR)], end of treatment (EOT), and 7-14 days after EOT. Using a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model and PK data from patients with Staphylococcus aureus at baseline, omadacycline free-drug plasma area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) values were determined, and the relationships between free-drug plasma AUC:MIC ratio and dichotomous efficacy endpoints were evaluated. Using these relationships, the population PK model, simulation, and an omadacycline MIC distribution for S. aureus, mean percent probabilities of response were evaluated. Statistically significant PK--PD relationships were identified for ECR (P = 0.016 and 0.013 for optimized two- and three-group free-drug plasma AUC:MIC ratios, respectively). At an MIC value of 0.5 µg/mL, percent probabilities of model-predicted success for ECR based on the univariable PK-PD relationships using continuous and two-group free-drug plasma AUC:MIC ratio variables were 91.9 and 95.6%, respectively, for the IV-to-PO dosing regimen and 89.3 and 88.4%, respectively, for the PO-only dosing regimen. These data support for omadacycline IV-to-PO and PO-only dosing regimens for ABSSSI and an omadacycline susceptibility breakpoint of 0.5 µg/mL for S. aureus.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Tetraciclinas , Humanos , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Tetraciclinas/farmacocinética , Tetraciclinas/uso terapéutico , Tetraciclinas/administración & dosificación , Tetraciclinas/farmacología , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Área Bajo la Curva , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Enfermedades Cutáneas Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Cutáneas Bacterianas/microbiología , Anciano , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Administración Oral , Esquema de Medicación
2.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 23(10): 825-832, 2024 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39361702

RESUMEN

The skin microbiome is essential for skin barrier function because it inhibits pathogen colonization, and decreased microbiome diversity correlates with increased Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) burden and atopic dermatitis (AD) severity. Managing S. aureuss-driven AD in clinical practice remains problematic due to complications such as AD exacerbation, impetigo, abscesses, and invasive infections. This project used a modified Delphi process comprising face-to-face discussions followed by a blinded vote to define 5 final consensus statements. A panel of 6 pediatric dermatologists developed a consensus on S. aureus-driven AD exacerbation, challenges in current treatments for AD with secondary bacterial infections, and new developments to improve patient care and outcomes. The panel's 5 consensus statements provide recommendations for dermatologists, pediatricians, and healthcare providers treating patients with secondary infected AD. These recommendations underscore the importance of recognizing and managing S. aureus skin infection in AD clinical practice and promoting antibiotic stewardship to mitigate resistance. The panel defined a significant unmet need for a single topical AD therapy effective against all symptoms, including pruritus, S. aureus-driven AD exacerbation, infection, and inflammation, across AD severity levels. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(10):825-832. doi:10.36849/JDD.8240.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Dermatitis Atópica , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas , Staphylococcus aureus , Dermatitis Atópica/microbiología , Dermatitis Atópica/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Atópica/tratamiento farmacológico , Dermatitis Atópica/terapia , Humanos , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/terapia , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Administración Cutánea , Piel/microbiología , Piel/patología , Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos/normas , Progresión de la Enfermedad
3.
Int J Mol Sci ; 25(18)2024 Sep 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39337422

RESUMEN

Infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are a major public health burden. Emerging antibiotic resistance has heightened the need for new treatment approaches for MRSA infection such as developing novel antimicrobial agents and enhancing the host's defense response. The thermo-ion channels Transient Receptor Potential (TRP-) A1 and V1 have been identified as modulators of S. aureus quorum sensing in cell culture models. However, their effects on in vivo infection control are unknown. In this study, we investigated the therapeutic effect of natural TRP ion channel inhibitors on MRSA skin infection in mice. While deletion of TRPV1 did not affect lesion size or inflammatory markers, TRPA1-/- mice demonstrated significantly reduced infection severity and abscess size. Treatment with natural inhibitors of TRPA1 with or without blockade of TRPV1 also reduced abscess size. Tissue transcriptomic data coupled with immunohistochemistry revealed that TRPA1 inhibition impacted heat shock protein expression (HSP), modulated the HIF-1a and MAPK pathways, and reduced IL4 expression. Additionally, metabolomics data showed an impact on purine and glycosaminoglycan pathways. Multi-omic integration of transcriptomic and metabolic data revealed that diacylglycerol metabolism was the likely bridge between metabolic and immunological impacts. Our findings suggest that TRPA1 antagonism could provide a promising and cost-effective therapeutic approach for reducing the severity of MRSA infection, and presents a novel underlying molecular mechanism.


Asunto(s)
Subunidad alfa del Factor 1 Inducible por Hipoxia , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas , Canal Catiónico TRPA1 , Animales , Canal Catiónico TRPA1/metabolismo , Canal Catiónico TRPA1/genética , Ratones , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/metabolismo , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/patología , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Subunidad alfa del Factor 1 Inducible por Hipoxia/metabolismo , Subunidad alfa del Factor 1 Inducible por Hipoxia/genética , Sistema de Señalización de MAP Quinasas/efectos de los fármacos , Ratones Noqueados , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/metabolismo , Canales Catiónicos TRPV/metabolismo , Canales Catiónicos TRPV/genética , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL
4.
Curr Opin Infect Dis ; 36(2): 57-66, 2023 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36718917

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Managing antimicrobial therapy in patients with complicated skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI) constitutes a growing challenge due to the wide spectrum of potential pathogens and resistance phenotypes. Today, microbiological documentation relies on cultural methods. This review summarizes the available evidence regarding the clinical input of rapid microbiological diagnostic tools (RMDT) and their impact on the management of antimicrobial therapy in SSTI. RECENT FINDINGS: Accurate tools are already available for the early detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in SSTI samples and may help avoiding or shortening empirical anti-MRSA coverage. Further research is necessary to develop and evaluate RMDT detecting group A streptococci (e.g., antigenic test) and Gram-negative pathogens (e.g., multiplex PCR assays), including through point-of-care utilization. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods could provide pivotal information for the stewardship of antimicrobial therapy, especially in case of polymicrobial or fungal SSTI and in the immunocompromised host; however, a shortening in the turnaround time and prospective data regarding their therapeutic input are needed to better appraise the clinical positioning of these promising approaches. SUMMARY: The clinical input of RMDT in SSTI is currently limited due to the scarcity of available dedicated assays and the polymicrobial feature of certain cases. NGS appears as a relevant tool but requires further developments before its implementation in routine clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas , Humanos , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/diagnóstico , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/microbiología , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/genética , Estudios Prospectivos , Prueba de Diagnóstico Rápido , Piel , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico
5.
Curr Opin Infect Dis ; 36(2): 102-108, 2023 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36718942

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To highlight the peculiarity of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) in elderly patients and to provide useful elements for their optimal management. RECENT FINDINGS: In the COVID-19 era, early discharge from the hospital and implementation of outpatient management is of key importance. SUMMARY: Elderly patients are at high risk of SSTIs due to several factors, including presence of multiple comorbidities and skin factors predisposing to infections. Clinical presentation may be atypical and some signs of severity, such as fever and increase in C-reactive protein, may be absent or aspecific in this patients population. An appropriate diagnosis of SSTIs in the elderly is crucial to avoid antibiotic overtreatment. Further studies should explore factors associated with bacterial superinfections in patients with pressure ulcers or lower limb erythema. Since several risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) may coexist in elderly patients, these subjects should be carefully screened for MRSA risk factors and those with high risk of resistant etiology should receive early antibiotic therapy active against MRSA. Physicians should aim to several objectives, including clinical cure, patient safety, early discharge and return to community. SSTIs in the elderly may be managed using long-acting antibiotics, but clinical follow-up is needed.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas , Humanos , Anciano , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/epidemiología , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/diagnóstico , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico
6.
Ann Pharmacother ; 57(6): 669-676, 2023 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36189671

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are often caused by gram-positive bacteria that colonize the skin. Given the overuse of antibiotics, SSTIs are increasingly caused by resistant bacteria, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Guidance on the utility of MRSA nasal screening for MRSA SSTI is limited. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether MRSA nasal screening predicts the risk of MRSA SSTIs. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of adult patients with an SSTI diagnosis that had MRSA nasal screening and wound cultures obtained within 48 hours of starting antibiotics. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and positive and negative likelihood ratios were calculated using VassarStats. Pretest and posttest probabilities were estimated with Microsoft Excel. RESULTS: A total of 884 patient encounters were reviewed between December 1, 2018, and October 31, 2021, and 300 patient encounters were included. The prevalence of MRSA SSTI was 18.3%. The MRSA nasal colonization had a sensitivity of 63.6%, specificity of 93.9%, positive predictive value of 70.0% (95% CI = 55.2%-81.7%), negative predictive value of 92.0% (95% CI = 87.7%-94.9%), positive likelihood ratio of 10.39 (95% CI = 6.12-17.65), negative likelihood ratio of 0.39 (95% CI = 0.27-0.55), positive posttest probability of 70.0%, and negative posttest probability of 8.0%. CONCLUSIONS: Given the high positive likelihood ratio, a positive MRSA nasal screen was associated with a large increase in the probability of MRSA SSTI at our institution, and a negative MRSA nasal screen was associated with a small but potentially significant decrease in the probability of MRSA SSTI.


Asunto(s)
Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas , Adulto , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/diagnóstico , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/epidemiología , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología
7.
J Infect Chemother ; 29(2): 143-149, 2023 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36265821

RESUMEN

The present study compared trends in antimicrobial resistance patterns in pathogens isolated from skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs) in Japan with those of a nationwide survey conducted in 2013. Three organisms that caused most of the SSTIs were collected from 12 dermatology departments in medical centers and 12 dermatology clinics across Japan between April 2019 and August 2020. A total of 390 strains, including 267 Staphylococcus aureus, 109 coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS), and 14 Streptococcus pyogenes strains were submitted to a central laboratory for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Patient demographic and clinical information was collated. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) was detected in 25.8% (69/267) of the S. aureus strains. The prevalence of MRSA between the present study and the 2013 survey did not differ significantly. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in MIC values and susceptibility patterns of the MRSA strains to other agents, regardless of a history of hospitalization within 1 year or invasive medical procedures. Methicillin-resistant CNS (MRCNS) was detected in 48.6% (53/109) of CNS isolates, higher than the 35.4% prevalence in the 2013 survey. This difference could be attributed to the heterogeneity in the members of the MRCNS, which comprises multiple staphylococci species, between the 2013 and 2019 surveys. However, it was noted that the susceptibility profiles of the MRCNS to each antibiotic were not significantly different from those identified in the 2013 survey. Most strains of S. pyogenes were susceptible to each antibiotic, similar to the 2013 survey. Continuous monitoring of trends in pathogen and susceptibility profiles is important to advise local public health efforts regarding the appropriate treatment of SSTIs.


Asunto(s)
Dermatología , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas , Humanos , Staphylococcus aureus , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Japón/epidemiología , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Staphylococcus , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/epidemiología , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/microbiología , Streptococcus pyogenes , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana
8.
Drug Dev Res ; 84(8): 1567-1571, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37540034

RESUMEN

Staphylococcus aureus is the leading cause of skin and soft tissue infections. With the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, there is an unmet clinical need to develop immune-based therapies to treat skin infections. Previously, we have shown pan-caspase inhibition as a potential host-directed immunotherapy against community-acquired methicillin-resistant S aureus (CA-MRSA) and other bacterial skin infections. Here, we evaluated the role of irreversible pan-caspase inhibitor emricasan as a monotherapy and an adjunctive with a standard-of-care antibiotic, doxycycline, as potential host-directed immunotherapies against S. aureus skin infections in vivo. We used the established CA-MRSA strain USA300 on the dorsum of WT C57BL/6J mice and monitored lesion size and bacterial burden noninvasively, and longitudinally over 14 days with in vivo bioluminescence imaging (BLI). Mice in four groups placebo (0.5% carboxymethyl cellulose [CMC] solution), placebo plus doxycycline (100 mg/kg), emricasan (40 mg/kg) plus doxycycline, and emricasan only were treated orally twice daily by oral gavage for 7 days, starting at 4 h after injection of S aureus. When compared with placebo, all three groups, placebo plus doxycycline, emricasan plus doxycycline, and emricasan treated group, exhibited biological effect, with reduction of both the lesion size (*p = .0277, ****p < .0001, ****p < .0001, respectively) and bacterial burden (***p = .003, ****p < .0001, ****p < .0001, respectively). Importantly, the efficacy of emricasan against S. aureus was not due to direct antibacterial activity. Collectively, pan-caspase inhibitor emricasan and emricasan plus doxycycline reduced both the lesion size and bacterial burden in vivo, and emricasan is a potential host-directed immunotherapy against MRSA skin infections in a preclinical mouse model.


Asunto(s)
Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas , Ratones , Animales , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Doxiciclina/farmacología , Doxiciclina/uso terapéutico , Staphylococcus aureus , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL
9.
Curr Opin Infect Dis ; 35(2): 112-119, 2022 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34812745

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Staphylococcus aureus is a pathogen incriminated in skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs), with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) becoming the predominant cause and representing a significant burden to the healthcare system. The last updated Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines concerning MRSA infections and SSTIs management were published in 2011 and 2014, respectively. The UK updated guidelines for MRSA infection treatment were published in 2021. Older treatment options may be associated with toxicity and require frequent dosing. There is a paucity of recent reviews on the armamentarium of new agents for MRSA SSTIs treatment. RECENT FINDINGS: Since 2005, several new antibiotics received a fast-track approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for SSTI treatment. These drugs include delafloxacin, omadacycline, tedizolid, ceftaroline, dalbavancin, oritavancin and telavancin. In this manuscript, we will review the data that led to these new drugs approval and discuss their advantages and disadvantages in MRSA SSTIs management. SUMMARY: MRSA is a major cause of SSTIs. Several novel therapies covering MRSA were FDA-approved for SSTIs. However, the current IDSA guidelines for MRSA infection and SSTIs as well as the recently published UK guidelines on MRSA treatment only consider these drugs as alternative choices or do not mention them at all.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus
10.
BMC Microbiol ; 22(1): 176, 2022 07 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35804301

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus is a leading cause for morbidity and mortality associated with skin and burn wound infections. Therapeutic options for methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) have dwindled and therefore alternative treatments are urgently needed. In this study, the immuno-stimulating and anti-MRSA effects of cyclic di-guanosine monophosphate (c-di-GMP), a uniquely bacterial second messenger and immuno-modulator, were investigated in HaCaT human epidermal keratinocytes and a murine skin wound infection model. RESULTS: Stimulation of HaCaT cells with 125 µM c-di-GMP for 12 h prior to MRSA challenge resulted in a 20-fold reduction in bacterial colonization compared with untreated control cells, which was not the result of a direct c-di-GMP toxic effect, since bacterial viability was not affected by this dose in the absence of HaCaT cells. C-di-GMP-stimulated or MRSA-challenged HaCaT cells displayed enhanced secretion of the antimicrobial peptides human ß-defensin 1 (hBD-1), hBD-2, hBD-3 and LL-37, but for hBD1 and LL-37 the responses were additive in a c-di-GMP-dose-dependent manner. Secretion of the chemokines CXCL1 and CXCL8 was also elevated after stimulation of HaCaT cells with lower c-di-GMP doses and peaked at a dose of 5 µM. Finally, pre-treatment of mice with a 200 nmol dose of c-di-GMP 24 h before a challenge with MRSA in skin wound infection model resulted in a major reduction (up to 1,100-fold by day 2) in bacterial CFU counts recovered from challenged skin tissue sections compared PBS-treated control animals. Tissue sections displayed inflammatory cell infiltration and enhanced neutrophil influx in the c-di-GMP pre-treated animals, which might account for the reduced ability of MRSA to colonize c-di-GMP pre-treated mice. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that c-di-GMP is a potent immuno-modulator that can stimulate anti-MRSA immune responses in vivo and might therefore be a suitable alternative prophylactic or therapeutic agent for MRSA skin or burn wound infections.


Asunto(s)
Adyuvantes Inmunológicos , GMP Cíclico/análogos & derivados , Inmunidad Innata , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/farmacología , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Animales , Quemaduras/complicaciones , GMP Cíclico/farmacología , GMP Cíclico/uso terapéutico , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Humanos , Inmunidad Innata/efectos de los fármacos , Queratinocitos/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Ratones , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico
11.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 41(2): 245-252, 2022 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34734346

RESUMEN

There is evidence that Staphylococcus aureus colonisation is linked to severity of atopic dermatitis. As no gold standard for S. aureus sampling on atopic dermatitis skin lesions exists, this study compared three commonly used methods. In addition, effectiveness of standard skin disinfection to remove S. aureus colonisation from these inflamed skin lesions was investigated. In 30 atopic dermatitis patients, three different S. aureus sampling methods, i.e. detergent scrubbing, moist swabbing and tape stripping, were performed on naïve and disinfected skin lesions. Two different S. aureus selective media, mannitol salt agar and chromID agar, were used for bacterial growing. Quantifying the S. aureus load varied significantly between the different sampling methods on naïve skin lesions ranging from mean 51 to 1.5 × 104 CFU/cm2 (p < 0.001). The qualitative detection on naïve skin was highest with the two detergent-based techniques (86% each), while for tape stripping, this value was 67% (all on chromID agar). In comparison, mannitol salt agar was less sensitive (p < 0.001). The disinfection of the skin lesions led to a significant reduction of the S. aureus load (p < 0.05) but no complete eradication in the case of previously positive swab. The obtained data highlight the importance of the selected sampling method and consecutive S. aureus selection agar plates to implement further clinical studies for the effectiveness of topical anti-staphylococcal antibiotics. Other disinfection regimes should be considered in atopic dermatitis patients when complete de-colonisation of certain skin areas is required, e.g. for surgical procedures.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades de la Piel/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades de la Piel/microbiología , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Adulto , Anciano , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Dermatitis Atópica/diagnóstico , Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina , Eccema , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Piel/microbiología , Enfermedades de la Piel/diagnóstico , Staphylococcus aureus , Adulto Joven
12.
Nucleic Acids Res ; 48(10): 5540-5554, 2020 06 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32347931

RESUMEN

In the fight against antimicrobial resistance, the bacterial DNA sliding clamp, ß-clamp, is a promising drug target for inhibition of DNA replication and translesion synthesis. The ß-clamp and its eukaryotic homolog, PCNA, share a C-terminal hydrophobic pocket where all the DNA polymerases bind. Here we report that cell penetrating peptides containing the PCNA-interacting motif APIM (APIM-peptides) inhibit bacterial growth at low concentrations in vitro, and in vivo in a bacterial skin infection model in mice. Surface plasmon resonance analysis and computer modeling suggest that APIM bind to the hydrophobic pocket on the ß-clamp, and accordingly, we find that APIM-peptides inhibit bacterial DNA replication. Interestingly, at sub-lethal concentrations, APIM-peptides have anti-mutagenic activities, and this activity is increased after SOS induction. Our results show that although the sequence homology between the ß-clamp and PCNA are modest, the presence of similar polymerase binding pockets in the DNA clamps allows for binding of the eukaryotic binding motif APIM to the bacterial ß-clamp. Importantly, because APIM-peptides display both anti-mutagenic and growth inhibitory properties, they may have clinical potential both in combination with other antibiotics and as single agents.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/química , Antibacterianos/farmacología , ADN Polimerasa III/antagonistas & inhibidores , Péptidos/química , Péptidos/farmacología , Animales , Antibacterianos/metabolismo , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , ADN Polimerasa III/química , Replicación del ADN/efectos de los fármacos , ADN Polimerasa Dirigida por ADN , Femenino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/genética , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/crecimiento & desarrollo , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Mutagénesis/efectos de los fármacos , Inhibidores de la Síntesis del Ácido Nucleico/química , Inhibidores de la Síntesis del Ácido Nucleico/farmacología , Inhibidores de la Síntesis del Ácido Nucleico/uso terapéutico , Péptidos/metabolismo , Péptidos/uso terapéutico , Antígeno Nuclear de Célula en Proliferación/metabolismo , Dominios y Motivos de Interacción de Proteínas , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Staphylococcus epidermidis/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus epidermidis/genética , Staphylococcus epidermidis/crecimiento & desarrollo
13.
Vet Dermatol ; 33(5): 384-391, 2022 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35945630

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Rifampicin (RFP) is a potential treatment for canine multidrug-resistant (MDR) meticillin-resistant staphylococci (MRS), yet the use of lower doses based on recent MIC data has not been evaluated in vivo. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: To provide information on the efficacy and safety of low-dose range RFP (≤6 mg/kg/day) for the treatment of canine MDR MRS pyoderma. ANIMALS: Fifty-one client-owned dogs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of dogs medical records. Dogs were from 11 US dermatology referral practices and had oral RFP at ≤6 mg/kg/day. Data evaluated included response to treatment, adverse events, and serum changes in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP). RESULTS: Complete resolution of pyoderma occurred in 39 of 51 dogs (76.5%). Topical antimicrobials were used concurrently in most cases (47 of 51; 92.2%). ALP elevation >1.5-fold of baseline or the high end of the reference range occurred in nine of 37 (24.3%) dogs, while ALT elevation above baseline and the high end of the reference range occurred in two of 36 (5.6%). Only six of 51 (11.8%) had clinical adverse events during treatment; five of six (83.3%) were mild reactions consisting of lethargy and gastrointestinal signs, while one dog had a possible cutaneous adverse drug reaction. Of those that experienced clinical adverse events, four of six (66.7%) did not have concurrent increased liver enzyme activity, while two of six (33.3%) had elevations in ALP alone. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Low-dose RFP (≤6 mg/kg/day) appears to be a relatively safe and effective single-agent systemic antibiotic in combination with topical antimicrobials for canine MDR MRS pyoderma.


CONTEXTE: La rifampicine (RFP) est un traitement potentiel des staphylocoques canins multirésistants (MDR) résistants à la méticilline (MRS), mais l'utilisation de doses plus faibles sur la base de données récentes sur la CMI n'a pas été évaluée in vivo. Hypothèse/Objectifs : Fournir des informations sur l'efficacité et l'innocuité des RFP à faible dose (≤ 6 mg/kg/jour) pour le traitement de la pyodermite MDR-MR canine. Animaux : Cinquante et un chiens de propriétaires. Matériels et méthodes : Revue rétrospective de chiens ayant reçu RFP par voie orale à des doses ≤ 6 mg/kg/jour provenant des dossiers médicaux de 11 centres de référés en dermatologie aux États-Unis. Les données évaluées comprenaient la réponse au traitement, les événements indésirables et les modifications sériques de l'alanine aminotransférase (ALT) et de la phosphatase alcaline (ALP). Résultats : Une résolution complète de la pyodermite s'est produite chez 39 des 51 chiens (76,5 %). Des antimicrobiens topiques ont été utilisés simultanément dans la plupart des cas (47 sur 51 ; 92,2 %). Une élévation de l'ALP> 1,5 fois la ligne de base ou l'extrémité supérieure de la plage de référence s'est produite chez neuf des 37 (24,3%) chiens, tandis qu'une élévation de l'ALT au-dessus de la ligne de base et de l'extrémité supérieure de la plage de référence s'est produite chez deux des 36 (5,6%). Seuls six sur 51 (11,8 %) ont eu des événements indésirables cliniques pendant le traitement ; cinq des six (83,3 %) étaient des réactions bénignes consistant en une léthargie et des signes gastro-intestinaux, tandis qu'un chien a eu un possible effet indésirable cutané au médicament. Parmi ceux qui ont subi des événements indésirables cliniques, quatre sur six (66,7 %) n'ont pas eu d'augmentation simultanée de l'activité des enzymes hépatiques, tandis que deux sur six (33,3 %) ont présenté des élévations de l'ALP seule. Conclusions et pertinence clinique : La RFP à faible dose (≤ 6 mg/kg/jour) semble être un antibiotique systémique à agent unique relativement sûr et efficace en association avec des antimicrobiens topiques pour la pyodermite MDR MRS canine.


Introducción- la rifampicina (RFP) es un tratamiento potencial para los estafilococos resistentes a múltiples fármacos (MDR) y meticilina (MRS), sin embargo, el uso de dosis más bajas basado en datos recientes de MIC no se ha evaluado in vivo. Hipótesis/Objetivos- Proporcionar información sobre la eficacia y seguridad de RFP en el rango de dosis bajas (≤6 mg/kg/día) para el tratamiento de la pioderma canina MDR MRS. Animales- Cincuenta y un perros propietarios particulares. Materiales y métodos- revisión retrospectiva de perros que recibieron RFP oral a dosis ≤6 mg/kg/día obtenida de historiales clínicos de 11 prácticas de referencia de dermatología de los Estados Unidos. Los datos evaluados incluyeron la respuesta al tratamiento, los eventos adversos y los cambios séricos en la alanina aminotransferasa (ALT) y la fosfatasa alcalina (ALP). Resultados- una resolución completa de la pioderma ocurrió en 39 de 51 perros (76,5 %). Antimicrobianos tópicos se usaron al mismo tiempo en la mayoría de los casos (47 de 51; 92,2%). En nueve de 37 (24,3 %) perros se produjo una elevación de ALP >1,5 veces respecto al valor inicial o el extremo superior del rango de referencia, mientras que en dos de 36 (5,6 %) se produjo una elevación de ALT por encima del valor inicial y en el límite superior del rango de referencia. Solo seis de 51 (11,8%) tuvieron eventos adversos clínicos durante el tratamiento; cinco de seis (83,3 %) fueron reacciones leves que consistieron en letargo y signos gastrointestinales, mientras que un perro tuvo una posible reacción cutánea adversa al medicamento. De los que experimentaron eventos adversos clínicos, cuatro de seis (66,7 %) no tuvieron un aumento simultáneo de la actividad de las enzimas hepáticas, mientras que dos de seis (33,3 %) tuvieron elevaciones en la ALP por sí sola. Conclusiones y relevancia clínica- la dosis baja de RFP (≤6 mg/kg/día) parece ser un antibiótico sistémico de uso único relativamente seguro y efectivo en combinación con antimicrobianos tópicos para la pioderma canina MDR MRS.


Contexto - A rifampicina (RFP) é um tratamento potencial para estafilococos resistentes à meticilina (MRS) multirresistentes (MDR) e a utilização de doses mais baixas baseado em dados recentes de MIC não foi avaliada in vivo. Hipótese/Objetivos: Fornecer informações sobre a eficácia e segurança de RFP em menor dosagem (≤6 mg/kg/dia) para o tratamento de piodermite canina por MRS MDR. Animais: Cinquenta e um cães de clientes. Materiais e métodos: Uma revisão retrospectiva dos prontuários de cães que receberam RFP oral na dose de ≤6 mg/kg/dia em 11 clínicas dermatológicas nos Estados Unidos. Os dados avaliados incluíram resposta ao tratamento, eventos adversos, alterações séricas de alanina aminotransferase (ALT) e fosfatase alcalina (FA). Resultados: Resolução completa da piodermite ocorreu em 39 de 51 dos cães (76,5%). Antimicrobianos tópicos foram utilizados concomitantemente na maioria dos casos (47 de 51; 92,2%). Elevação de mais de 1,5 vezes na FA ou para o limite superior do intervalo de referência ocorreu em nove de 37 cães (24,3%), enquanto a elevação de ALT acima do valor inicial e o limite superior do valor de referência ocorreu em dois de 36 (5,6%). Apenas cinco de 51 (11,8%) apresentaram efeitos adversos durante o tratamento; cinco de seis (83,3%) tiveram reações leves caracterizadas por letargia e sinais gastrointestinais, enquanto um cão apresentou uma possível farmacodermia. Dos que apresentaram eventos adversos, quatro de seis (66,7%) não apresentaram aumento concomitante de enzimas hepáticas, enquanto dois de seis (33,3%) tiveram aumento de FA isoladamente. Conclusões e relevância clínica - RFP em baixa dosagem (≤6 mg/kg/dia) aparenta ser relativamente segura e eficaz em monoterapia no tratamento da piodermite canina por MRS MDR por via sistêmica, associada a antimicrobianos tópicos.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Perros , Piodermia , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas , Animales , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades de los Perros/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades de los Perros/tratamiento farmacológico , Perros , Meticilina/farmacología , Resistencia a la Meticilina , Piodermia/tratamiento farmacológico , Piodermia/veterinaria , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rifampin/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/veterinaria , Staphylococcus
14.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(11): e4568-e4577, 2021 12 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32521007

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A household approach to decolonization decreases skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI) incidence, though this is burdensome and costly. As prior SSTI increases risk for SSTI, we hypothesized that the effectiveness of decolonization measures to prevent SSTI when targeted to household members with prior year SSTI would be noninferior to decolonizing all household members. METHODS: Upon completion of our 12-month observational Household Observation of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the Environment (HOME) study, 102 households were enrolled in HOME2, a 12-month, randomized noninferiority trial. Pediatric index patients with community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) SSTI, their household contacts, and pets were enrolled. Households were randomized 1:1 to the personalized (decolonization performed only by household members who experienced SSTI during the HOME study) or household (decolonization performed by all household members) approaches. The 5-day regimen included hygiene education, twice-daily intranasal mupirocin, and daily bleach-water baths. At 5 follow-up visits in participants' homes, swabs to detect S. aureus were collected from participants, environmental surfaces, and pets; incident SSTIs were ascertained. RESULTS: Noninferiority of the personalized approach was established for the primary outcome 3-month cumulative SSTI: 23 of 212 (10.8%) participants reported SSTI in household approach households, while 23 of 236 (9.7%) participants reported SSTI in personalized approach households (difference in proportions, -1.1% [95% confidence interval, -6.7% to 4.5%]). In multivariable analyses, prior year SSTI and baseline MRSA colonization were associated with cumulative SSTI. CONCLUSIONS: The personalized approach was noninferior to the household approach in preventing SSTI. Future studies should interrogate longer durations of decolonization and/or decontamination of the household environment to reduce household MRSA burden. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01814371.


Asunto(s)
Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Humanos , Mupirocina/uso terapéutico , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/prevención & control , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/prevención & control , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/prevención & control , Staphylococcus aureus
15.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(5): e1045-e1053, 2021 09 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33197926

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus skin and soft tissue infections (SA-SSTIs) are common in healthcare and community settings, and recurrences occur at variable frequency, even after successful initial treatment. Knowing the exact burden and timing of recurrent disease is critical to planning and evaluating interventions to prevent recurrent SSTIs. METHODS: In this retrospective study, SSTI cases in patients aged ≥18 years at 3 US medical centers (Columbia, Chicago, Vanderbilt) between 2006 and 2016 were analyzed according to a biennial cohort design. Index SSTIs (with or without key comorbidities), either microbiologically confirmed to be SA-SSTI or not microbiologically tested (NMT-SSTI), were recorded within 1 calendar year and followed up for 12 months for recurrent infections. The number of index cases, proportion of index cases with ≥1 recurrence(s), time to first recurrence, and number of recurrences were collected for both SA-SSTI and NMT-SSTI events. RESULTS: In the most recent cohorts, 4755 SSTI cases were reported at Columbia, 2873 at Chicago, and 6433 at Vanderbilt. Of these, 452, 153, and 354 cases were confirmed to be due to S. aureus. Most cases were reported in patients without key comorbidities. Across centers, 16.4%-19.0% (SA-SSTI) and 11.0%-19.2% (NMT-SSTI) of index cases had ≥1 recurrence(s). In patients without key comorbidities, more than 60% of index SSTIs with recurrences had only 1 recurrence, half of which occurred in the first 3 months following primary infection. CONCLUSIONS: SA-SSTI recurrences are common among healthy adults and occur in at least 1 in 6 individuals during the 1 year following the primary event.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas , Adolescente , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/epidemiología , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Staphylococcus aureus
16.
Clin Infect Dis ; 72(4): 675-681, 2021 02 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32047886

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Most skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are managed in the outpatient setting, but data are lacking on treatment patterns outside the emergency department (ED). Available data suggest that there is poor adherence to SSTI treatment guidelines. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of Veterans diagnosed with SSTIs in the ED or outpatient clinics from 1 January 2005 through 30 June 2018. The incidence of SSTIs over time was modeled using Poisson regression using robust standard errors. Antibiotic selection and incision and drainage (I&D) were described and compared between ambulatory settings. Anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) antibiotic use was compared to SSTI treatment guidelines. RESULTS: There were 1 740 992 incident SSTIs in 1 156 725 patients during the study period. The incidence of SSTIs significantly decreased from 4.58 per 1000 patient-years in 2005 to 3.27 per 1000 patient-years in 2018 (P < .001). There were lower rates of ß-lactam prescribing (32.5% vs 51.7%) in the ED compared to primary care (PC), and higher rates of anti-MRSA therapy (51.4% vs 35.1%) in the ED compared to PC. The I&D rate in the ED was 8.1% compared to 2.6% in PC. Antibiotic regimens without MRSA activity were prescribed in 24.9% of purulent SSTIs. Anti-MRSA antibiotics were prescribed in 40.1% of nonpurulent SSTIs. CONCLUSIONS: We found a decrease in the incidence of SSTIs in the outpatient setting over time. Treatment of SSTIs varied depending on the presenting ambulatory location. There is poor adherence to guidelines in regard to use of anti-MRSA therapies. Further study is needed to understand the impact of guideline nonadherence on patient outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas , Veteranos , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/epidemiología
17.
Curr Opin Infect Dis ; 34(2): 80-88, 2021 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33560018

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In standard clinical practice, combined antibiotic treatment is used to treat severe skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs), whereby one of the drugs is usually a protein synthesis inhibitor antibiotic. However, evidence for this practice is only based on data from 'in vitro' studies, animal models and case reports. There are no randomized controlled trials. In the light of several new drugs marketed for the treatment of these infections, there is a need to revise the state of the art. RECENT FINDINGS: New reviews and systematic appraisals of the literature exist on the use of protein synthesis inhibitor antibiotics to treat severe SSTI. Several 'in vitro' studies have assessed the efficacy of some of the new drugs. SUMMARY: Combination therapy, including an adjuvant protein synthesis inhibitor antibiotic for toxin suppression, should be used both in patients with severe SSTI and in those with moderate infection and risk factors for methicillin-resistant positive- or Panton-Valentine leukocidin positive-Staphylococcus aureus infection.


Asunto(s)
Antitoxinas/administración & dosificación , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Animales , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/microbiología , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus/fisiología
18.
Curr Opin Infect Dis ; 34(2): 63-71, 2021 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33278179

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this study was to present recent microbiological, experimental, clinical and tolerance data for cotrimoxazole and clindamycin in the specific field of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs). RECENT FINDINGS: Staphylococcus aureus and streptococci remain the leading cause of SSTIs. Cotrimoxazole is a good anti-Gram-positive agent with preserved activity against methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and streptococci. Although clindamycin has good methicillin-susceptible S. aureus activity, a growing number of resistant MRSA and streptococci have been reported. Strong experimental data support the antitoxin activity of clindamycin, but clinical observations remain scarce. Several recent randomized trials involving cotrimoxazole and/or clindamycin demonstrate the efficacy and tolerance of both drugs. The oral formulation of both drugs may facilitate the implementation of early switch and early discharge protocols in clinical practice. SUMMARY: Recent publications demonstrate that cotrimoxazole and clindamycin remain reliable and realistic therapeutic approaches for SSTIs.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Clindamicina/administración & dosificación , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Combinación Trimetoprim y Sulfametoxazol/administración & dosificación , Animales , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/microbiología , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus/fisiología
19.
Mol Pharm ; 18(11): 4099-4110, 2021 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34554755

RESUMEN

Skin and soft tissue infections require effective and sustained topical administration. Platensimycin (PTM) is a natural drug lead that targets bacterial fatty acid synthases and has a great potential to treat infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). To facilitate the use of PTM against local MRSA infections, we prepared polyacrylamide hydrogels containing polyamidoamine (PAMAM)/PTM nanoparticles (NP-gel(PTM)) for the controlled release of PTM. NP-gel(PTM) can continuously inhibit the growth of MRSA and its biofilm formation in simulated drug flow models in vitro. In situ implantation of NP-gel(PTM) could treat MRSA-infected subcutaneous soft tissues without toxicity. For MRSA-infected skin wounds, NP-gel(PTM) not only showed strong anti-MRSA activity but also accelerated more wound healing than the widely used antibiotic mupirocin. Collectively, PTM is expected to be used in this safe and effective NP-gel delivery platform for the treatment of local infections, which might help to alleviate the current antibiotic resistance crisis.


Asunto(s)
Adamantano/administración & dosificación , Aminobenzoatos/administración & dosificación , Anilidas/administración & dosificación , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Sistema de Administración de Fármacos con Nanopartículas/química , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección de Heridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adamantano/farmacocinética , Aminobenzoatos/farmacocinética , Anilidas/farmacocinética , Animales , Biopelículas/efectos de los fármacos , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada/administración & dosificación , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada/farmacocinética , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Liberación de Fármacos , Humanos , Hidrogeles/química , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Ratones , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Poliaminas/química , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Cicatrización de Heridas/efectos de los fármacos , Infección de Heridas/microbiología
20.
Protein Expr Purif ; 188: 105949, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34324967

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The production of alternative novel antimicrobial agents is considered an efficient way to cope with multidrug resistance among pathogenic bacteria. E50-52 and Ib-AMP4 antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) have illustrated great proven antibacterial effects. The aim of this study was recombinant production of these AMPs and investigation of their synergistic effects on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). METHOD: At first, the codon optimized sequences of the Ib-AMP4 (UniProt: 024006 (PRO_0000020721), and E50-52 (UniProtKB: P85148) were individually ligated into the pET-32α vector and transformed into E. coli. After the optimization of production and purification steps, the MIC (Minimum inhibitory concentration), time kill and growth kinetic tests of recombinant proteins were determined against MRSA. Finally, the in vivo wound healing efficiency was tested. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The recorded MIC of recombinant Trx-Ib-AMP4, Trx-E50-52 against MRSA bacterium were 0.375 and 0.0875 mg/mL respectively. The combination application of the produced AMPs by the checkerboard method confirmed their synergic activity. The results of the time-kill showed sharply decrease of the number of viable cells with over five time reductions in log10 CFU/mL by the combination of Trx-E50-52 and Trx-IbAMP4 at 2 × MIC within 240 min. The growth kinetic results confirmed the combination of Trx-E50-52 and Trx-IbAMP4 had much greater success in the reduction of over 50 % of MRSA suspensions' turbidity within the first hour. Wound healing assay and histological analysis of infected mice treated with Trx-Ib-AMP4 or Trx-E50-52 compared with those treated with a combination of Trx-Ib-AMP4 and Trx-E50-52 showed significant synergic effects.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Péptidos Catiónicos Antimicrobianos/farmacología , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Heridas no Penetrantes/tratamiento farmacológico , Animales , Antibacterianos/biosíntesis , Péptidos Catiónicos Antimicrobianos/biosíntesis , Péptidos Catiónicos Antimicrobianos/genética , Clonación Molecular , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Escherichia coli/genética , Escherichia coli/metabolismo , Expresión Génica , Vectores Genéticos/química , Vectores Genéticos/metabolismo , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/crecimiento & desarrollo , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/patogenicidad , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Ratas , Ratas Wistar , Proteínas Recombinantes/biosíntesis , Proteínas Recombinantes/genética , Proteínas Recombinantes/farmacología , Piel/efectos de los fármacos , Piel/lesiones , Piel/microbiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/patología , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/patología , Cicatrización de Heridas/efectos de los fármacos , Heridas no Penetrantes/microbiología , Heridas no Penetrantes/patología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA