RESUMEN
Burn injuries including those caused by chemicals can result in systemic effects and acute lung injury (ALI). Cutaneous exposure to Lewisite, a warfare and chemical burn agent, also causes ALI. To overcome the limitations in conducting direct research on Lewisite-induced ALI in a laboratory setting, an animal model was developed using phenylarsine oxide (PAO) as a surrogate for Lewisite. Due to lack of a reliable animal model mimicking the effects of such exposures, development of effective therapies to treat such injuries is challenging. We demonstrated that a single cutaneous exposure to PAO resulted in disruption of the alveolar-capillary barrier as evidenced by elevated protein levels in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). BALF supernatant of PAO-exposed animals had increased levels of high mobility group box 1, a damage associated molecular pattern molecule. Arterial blood-gas measurements showed decreased pH, increased PaCO2, and decreased partial pressure of arterial O2, indicative of respiratory acidosis, hypercapnia, and hypoxemia. Increased protein levels of interleukin (IL)-6, CXCL-1, CXCL-2, CXCL-5, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, CXCL-10, leukemia inhibitory factor, leptin, IL-18, CCL-2, CCL-3, and CCL-7 were observed in the lung of PAO-exposed mice. Further, vascular endothelial growth factor levels were reduced in the lung. Pulmonary function evaluated using a flexiVent showed a downward shift in the pressure-volume loop, decreases in static compliance and inspiratory capacity, increases in respiratory elastance and tissue elastance. These changes are consistent with an ALI phenotype. These results demonstrate that cutaneous PAO exposure leads to ALI and that the model can be used as an effective surrogate to investigate vesicant-induced ALI. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This study presents a robust model for studying ALI resulting from cutaneous exposure to PAO, a surrogate for the toxic vesicating agent Lewisite. The findings in this study mimic the effects of cutaneous Lewisite exposure, providing a reliable model for investigating mechanisms underlying toxicity. The model can also be used to develop medical countermeasures to mitigate ALI associated with cutaneous Lewisite exposure.
Asunto(s)
Lesión Pulmonar Aguda , Arsenicales , Irritantes , Ratones , Animales , Irritantes/efectos adversos , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/metabolismo , Pulmón/metabolismo , Lesión Pulmonar Aguda/inducido químicamente , Lesión Pulmonar Aguda/metabolismo , Líquido del Lavado Bronquioalveolar/química , Interleucina-6/metabolismoRESUMEN
Vesicants such as arsenicals and mustards produce highly painful cutaneous inflammatory and blistering responses, hence developed as chemical weapons during World War I/II. Here, using lewisite and sulfur mustard surrogates, namely phenylarsine oxide (PAO) and 2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfide (CEES), respectively, we defined a common underlying mechanism of toxic action by these two distinct classes of vesicants. Murine skin exposure to these chemicals causes tissue destruction characterized by increase in skin bifold thickness, Draize score, infiltration of inflammatory cells, and apoptosis of epidermal and dermal cells. RNA sequencing analysis identified â¼346 inflammatory genes that were commonly altered by both PAO and CEES, along with the identification of cytokine signaling activation as the top canonical pathway. Activation of several proinflammatory genes and pathways is associated with phosphorylation-dependent activation of heat shock protein 90α (p-HSP90α). Topical treatment with known HSP90 inhibitors SNX-5422 and IPI-504 post PAO or CEES skin challenge significantly attenuated skin damage including reduction in overall skin injury and clinical scores. In addition, highly upregulated inflammatory genes Saa3, Cxcl1, Ccl7, IL-6, Nlrp3, Csf3, Chil3, etc. by both PAO and CEES were significantly diminished by treatment with HSP90 inhibitors. These drugs not only reduced PAO- or CEES-induced p-HSP90α expression but also its client proteins NLRP3 and pP38 and the expression of their target inflammatory genes. Our data confirm a critical role of HSP90 as a shared underlying molecular target of toxicity by these two distinct vesicants and provide an effective and novel medical countermeasure to suppress vesicant-induced skin injury. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Development of effective and novel mechanism-based antidotes that can simultaneously block cutaneous toxic manifestations of distinct vesicants is important and urgently needed. Due to difficulties in determining the exact nature of onsite chemical exposure, a potent drug that can suppress widespread cutaneous damage may find great utility. Thus, this study identified HSP90 as a common molecular regulator of cutaneous inflammation and injury by two distinct warfare vesicants, arsenicals and mustards, and HSP90 inhibitors afford significant protection against skin damage.
Asunto(s)
Arsenicales , Sustancias para la Guerra Química , Gas Mostaza , Humanos , Animales , Ratones , Proteína con Dominio Pirina 3 de la Familia NLR/metabolismo , Sustancias para la Guerra Química/toxicidad , Irritantes , Piel , Gas Mostaza/toxicidad , Arsenicales/metabolismo , Arsenicales/farmacologíaRESUMEN
Inhaled toxicants are used for diverse purposes, ranging from industrial applications such as agriculture, sanitation, and fumigation to crowd control and chemical warfare, and acute exposure can induce lasting respiratory complications. The intentional release of chemical warfare agents (CWAs) during World War I caused life-long damage for survivors, and CWA use is outlawed by international treaties. However, in the past two decades, chemical warfare use has surged in the Middle East and Eastern Europe, with a shift toward lung toxicants. The potential use of industrial and agricultural chemicals in rogue activities is a major concern as they are often stored and transported near populated areas, where intentional or accidental release can cause severe injuries and fatalities. Despite laws and regulatory agencies that regulate use, storage, transport, emissions, and disposal, inhalational exposures continue to cause lasting lung injury. Industrial irritants (e.g., ammonia) aggravate the upper respiratory tract, causing pneumonitis, bronchoconstriction, and dyspnea. Irritant gases (e.g., acrolein, chloropicrin) affect epithelial barrier integrity and cause tissue damage through reactive intermediates or by direct adduction of cysteine-rich proteins. Symptoms of CWAs (e.g., chlorine gas, phosgene, sulfur mustard) progress from airway obstruction and pulmonary edema to acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which results in respiratory depression days later. Emergency treatment is limited to supportive care using bronchodilators to control airway constriction and rescue with mechanical ventilation to improve gas exchange. Complications from acute exposure can promote obstructive lung disease and/or pulmonary fibrosis, which require long-term clinical care. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Inhaled chemical threats are of growing concern in both civilian and military settings, and there is an increased need to reduce acute lung injury and delayed clinical complications from exposures. This minireview highlights our current understanding of acute toxicity and pathophysiology of a select number of chemicals of concern. It discusses potential early-stage therapeutic development as well as challenges in developing countermeasures applicable for administration in mass casualty situations.
Asunto(s)
Lesión Pulmonar Aguda , Sustancias para la Guerra Química , Fosgeno , Humanos , Pulmón , Cloro/farmacología , Cloro/toxicidad , Sustancias para la Guerra Química/toxicidad , Fosgeno/metabolismo , Fosgeno/farmacología , Lesión Pulmonar Aguda/metabolismo , IrritantesRESUMEN
Phosgene oxime (CX), categorized as a vesicating chemical threat agent, causes effects that resemble an urticant or nettle agent. CX is an emerging potential threat agent that can be deployed alone or with other chemical threat agents to enhance their toxic effects. Studies on CX-induced skin toxicity, injury progression, and related biomarkers are largely unknown. To study the physiologic changes, skin clinical lesions and their progression, skin exposure of SKH-1 and C57BL/6 mice was carried out with vapor from 10 µl CX for 0.5-minute or 1.0-minute durations using a designed exposure system for consistent CX vapor exposure. One-minute exposure caused sharp (SKH-1) or sustained (C57BL/6) decrease in respiratory and heart rate, leading to mortality in both mouse strains. Both exposures caused immediate blanching, erythema with erythematous ring (wheel) and edema, and an increase in skin bifold thickness. Necrosis was also observed in the 0.5-minute CX exposure group. Both mouse strains showed comparative skin clinical lesions upon CX exposure; however, skin bifold thickness and erythema remained elevated up to 14 days postexposure in SKH-1 mice but not in C57BL/6 mice. Our data suggest that CX causes immediate changes in the physiologic parameters and gross skin lesions resembling urticaria, which could involve mast cell activation and intense systemic toxicity. This novel study recorded and compared the progression of skin injury to establish clinical biomarkers of CX dermal exposure in both the sexes of two murine strains relevant for skin and systemic injury studies and therapeutic target identification. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Phosgene oxime (CX), categorized as a vesicating agent, is considered as a potent chemical weapon and is of high military and terrorist threat interest since it produces rapid onset of severe injury as an urticant. However, biomarkers of clinical relevance related to its toxicity and injury progression are not studied. Data from this study provide useful clinical markers of CX skin toxicity in mouse models using a reliable CX exposure system for future mechanistic and efficacy studies.
Asunto(s)
Sustancias para la Guerra Química , Gas Mostaza , Fosgeno , Animales , Ratones , Fosgeno/toxicidad , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Gas Mostaza/toxicidad , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Piel , Irritantes/toxicidad , Eritema/inducido químicamente , Eritema/patología , Biomarcadores , Oximas/toxicidad , Sustancias para la Guerra Química/toxicidadRESUMEN
Nitrogen mustard (NM) is a cytotoxic vesicant known to cause pulmonary injury that can progress to fibrosis. NM toxicity is associated with an influx of inflammatory macrophages in the lung. Farnesoid X receptor (FXR) is a nuclear receptor involved in bile acid and lipid homeostasis that has anti-inflammatory activity. In these studies, we analyzed the effects of FXR activation on lung injury, oxidative stress, and fibrosis induced by NM. Male Wistar rats were exposed to phosphate-buffered saline (vehicle control) or NM (0.125 mg/kg) by intratracheal Penncentury-MicroSprayer aerosolization; this was followed by treatment with the FXR synthetic agonist, obeticholic acid (OCA, 15 mg/kg), or vehicle control (0.13-0.18 g peanut butter) 2 hours later and then once per day, 5 days per week thereafter for 28 days. NM caused histopathological changes in the lung, including epithelial thickening, alveolar circularization, and pulmonary edema. Picrosirius red staining and lung hydroxyproline content were increased, indicative of fibrosis; foamy lipid-laden macrophages were also identified in the lung. This was associated with aberrations in pulmonary function, including increases in resistance and hysteresis. Following NM exposure, lung expression of HO-1 and iNOS, and the ratio of nitrates/nitrites in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL), markers of oxidative stress increased, along with BAL levels of inflammatory proteins, fibrinogen, and sRAGE. Administration of OCA attenuated NM-induced histopathology, oxidative stress, inflammation, and altered lung function. These findings demonstrate that FXR plays a role in limiting NM-induced lung injury and chronic disease, suggesting that activating FXR may represent an effective approach to limiting NM-induced toxicity. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: In this study, the role of farnesoid-X-receptor (FXR) in mustard vesicant-induced pulmonary toxicity was analyzed using nitrogen mustard (NM) as a model. This study's findings that administration of obeticholic acid, an FXR agonist, to rats reduces NM-induced pulmonary injury, oxidative stress, and fibrosis provide novel mechanistic insights into vesicant toxicity, which may be useful in the development of efficacious therapeutics.
Asunto(s)
Ácido Quenodesoxicólico/análogos & derivados , Lesión Pulmonar , Mecloretamina , Ratas , Masculino , Animales , Mecloretamina/toxicidad , Irritantes/efectos adversos , Ratas Wistar , Pulmón , Fibrosis , Inflamación/inducido químicamente , Inflamación/tratamiento farmacológico , Inflamación/patología , Lesión Pulmonar/metabolismo , Estrés Oxidativo , LípidosRESUMEN
Sulfur mustard (SM), a vesicating agent first used during World War I, remains a potent threat as a chemical weapon to cause intentional/accidental chemical emergencies. Eyes are extremely susceptible to SM toxicity. Nitrogen mustard (NM), a bifunctional alkylating agent and potent analog of SM, is used in laboratories to study mustard vesicant-induced ocular toxicity. Previously, we showed that SM-/NM-induced injuries (in vivo and ex vivo rabbit corneas) are reversed upon treatment with dexamethasone (DEX), a US Food and Drug Administration-approved, steroidal anti-inflammatory drug. Here, we optimized NM injuries in ex vivo human corneas and assessed DEX efficacy. For injury optimization, one cornea (randomly selected from paired eyes) was exposed to NM: 100 nmoles for 2 hours or 4 hours, and 200 nmoles for 2 hours, and the other cornea served as a control. Injuries were assessed 24 hours post NM-exposure. NM 100 nmoles exposure for 2 hours was found to cause optimal corneal injury (epithelial thinning [â¼69%]; epithelial-stromal separation [6-fold increase]). In protein arrays studies, 24 proteins displayed ≥40% change in their expression in NM exposed corneas compared with controls. DEX administration initiated 2 hours post NM exposure and every 8 hours thereafter until 24 hours post-exposure reversed NM-induced corneal epithelial-stromal separation [2-fold decrease]). Of the 24 proteins dysregulated upon NM exposure, six proteins (delta-like canonical Notch ligand 1, FGFbasic, CD54, CCL7, endostatin, receptor tyrosine-protein kinase erbB-4) associated with angiogenesis, immune/inflammatory responses, and cell differentiation/proliferation, showed significant reversal upon DEX treatment (Student's t test; P ≤ 0.05). Complementing our animal model studies, DEX was shown to mitigate vesicant-induced toxicities in ex vivo human corneas. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Nitrogen mustard (NM) exposure-induced injuries were optimized in an ex vivo human cornea culture model and studies were carried out at 24 h post 100 nmoles NM exposure. Dexamethasone (DEX) administration (started 2 h post NM exposure and every 8 h thereafter) reversed NM-induced corneal injuries. Molecular mediators of DEX action were associated with angiogenesis, immune/inflammatory responses, and cell differentiation/proliferation, indicating DEX aids wound healing via reversing vesicant-induced neovascularization (delta-like canonical Notch ligand 1 and FGF basic) and leukocyte infiltration (CD54 and CCL7).
Asunto(s)
Sustancias para la Guerra Química , Lesiones de la Cornea , Gas Mostaza , Animales , Humanos , Conejos , Mecloretamina/toxicidad , Irritantes/efectos adversos , Sustancias para la Guerra Química/toxicidad , Ligandos , Córnea , Lesiones de la Cornea/inducido químicamente , Lesiones de la Cornea/tratamiento farmacológico , Lesiones de la Cornea/metabolismo , Gas Mostaza/toxicidad , Dexametasona/farmacología , Dexametasona/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Distinguishing between allergic and nonallergic forms of Contact Dermatitis (CD) is challenging and requires investigations based on patch-testing. Early detection of allergy biomarkers in active CD lesions could refine and simplify the management of CD patients. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the molecular signatures of active CD lesions. METHODS: We studied the expression of 12 allergy biomarkers by qRT-PCR in active lesions of 38 CD patients. Allergic CD (ACD) was diagnosed based on patch test (PT) results and exposure assessment. Molecular signatures of active lesions, as well as positive PT reactions, were compared with those of reference chemical allergens and irritants. RESULTS: Nineteen of the 38 CD patients reacted positively upon patch-testing and exposure assessment confirmed ACD diagnosis for 17 of them. Gene profiling of active CD lesions revealed 2 distinct molecular patterns: patients harboring signatures similar to reference allergens (n = 23) or irritants (n = 15). Among the 23 patients with an "allergy signature," we found the 17 patients with confirmed ACD, while no culprit allergen was identified for the 6 other patients. Interestingly, the 15 patients without biomarker induction had negative PT, suggesting that they developed nonallergic CD reactions. CONCLUSION: Molecular signatures from active skin lesions may help to stratify CD patients and predict those suffering from ACD.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Irritante , Humanos , Irritantes , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/genética , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/patología , Alérgenos , Pruebas del Parche/métodos , Biomarcadores , Dermatitis Irritante/diagnósticoRESUMEN
NF-erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) is a major transcription factor to protect cells against reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive toxicants. Meanwhile, Nrf2 can inhibit contact dermatitis through redox-dependent and -independent pathways. However, the underlying mechanisms of how Nrf2 mediates irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) are still unclear. In this article, we elucidated the role of Nrf2 in 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA)-induced acute ICD. Our study demonstrated that the ear thickness, redness, swelling, and neutrophil infiltration were significantly increased, accompanied by increased expression of inflammatory cytokines (IL-1α, IL-1ß, IL-6, etc.) and decreased expression of antioxidant genes (HO-1 and NQO1) in Nrf2 knockout mice. Moreover, ERK phosphorylation was elevated in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) from Nrf2 knockout mouse. Inhibition of ERK significantly alleviated TPA-induced cutaneous inflammation and ROS accumulation in MEFs derived from mouse. Conversely, ROS scavenging inhibited the ERK activation and TPA-induced inflammation in MEFs. Taken together, the findings illustrate the key role of the Nrf2/ROS/ERK signaling pathway in TPA-induced acute ICD.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis por Contacto , Factor 2 Relacionado con NF-E2 , Animales , Ratones , Fibroblastos/metabolismo , Hemo-Oxigenasa 1/metabolismo , Inflamación , Irritantes , Ratones Noqueados , Factor 2 Relacionado con NF-E2/genética , Factor 2 Relacionado con NF-E2/metabolismo , Especies Reactivas de Oxígeno/metabolismo , Transducción de Señal , Acetato de TetradecanoilforbolRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The impact of chronic occupational exposures to irritants on asthma remains discussed. We studied the associations between occupational exposures and asthma, with specific interest for chronic exposure to irritants, including disinfectants and cleaning products (DCPs) and solvents. METHODS: Cross-sectional analyses included 115 540 adults (55% women, mean age 43 years, 10% current asthma) working at inclusion in the French population-based CONSTANCES cohort (2012-2020). Current asthma was defined by ever asthma with symptoms, medication or asthma attacks (past 12 months), and the asthma symptom score by the sum of 5 respiratory symptoms (past 12 months). Both lifetime and current occupational exposures were assessed by the Occupational Asthma-specific Job-Exposure Matrix. Associations were evaluated by gender using logistic and binomial negative regressions adjusted for age, smoking status and body mass index. RESULTS: In women, associations were observed between current asthma and lifetime exposure to irritants (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.11), DCPs (1.06, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.12) and solvents (1.06, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.14). In men, only lifetime exposure to DCPs (1.10, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.20) was associated with current asthma. Lifetime exposure to irritants was associated with higher asthma symptom score both in women (mean score ratio: 1.08, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.11) and men (1.11, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.15), especially for DCPs (women: 1.09, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.13, men: 1.21, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.27) and solvents (women 1.14, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.19, men: 1.10, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.15). For current exposures, no consistent associations were observed with current asthma and asthma symptom score. CONCLUSIONS: Lifetime occupational exposures to irritants were associated with current asthma and higher asthma symptom score. These exposures should be carefully considered in asthma management.
Asunto(s)
Asma Ocupacional , Enfermedades Profesionales , Exposición Profesional , Adulto , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Irritantes/efectos adversos , Estudios Transversales , Enfermedades Profesionales/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Asma Ocupacional/inducido químicamente , Asma Ocupacional/epidemiología , Solventes/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Sensory irritation is a health endpoint that serves as the critical effect basis for many occupational exposure limits (OELs). Schaper 1993 described a significant relationship with high correlation between the measured exposure concentration producing a 50% respiratory rate decrease (RD50) in a standard rodent assay and the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH®) Threshold Limit Values (TLVs®) as time-weighted averages (TWAs) for airborne chemical irritants. The results demonstrated the potential use of the RD50 values for deriving full-shift TWA OELs protective of irritant responses. However, there remains a need to develop a similar predictive model for deriving workplace short-term exposure limits (STELs) for sensory irritants. The aim of our study was to establish a model capable of correlating the relationship between RD50 values and published STELs to prospectively derive short-term exposure OELs for sensory irritants. A National Toxicology Program (NTP) database that included chemicals with both an RD50 and established STELs was used to fit several linear regression models. A strong correlation between RD50s and STELs was identified, with a predictive equation of ln (STEL) (ppm) = 0.86 * ln (RD50) (ppm) - 2.42 and an R2 value of 0.75. This model supports the use of RD50s to derive STELs for chemicals without existing exposure recommendations. Further, for data-poor sensory irritants, predicted RD50 values from in silico quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) models can be used to derive STELs. Hence, in silico methods and statistical modeling can present a path forward for establishing reliable OELs and improving worker safety and health.
Asunto(s)
Irritantes , Exposición Profesional , Valores Limites del Umbral , Irritantes/toxicidad , Frecuencia Respiratoria , Depresión , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Electrical stimulation (ES) is a widely used technique in the medical field for various purposes. The effect of ES on several skin properties has been investigated; however, its effect on skin vulnerability to irritants remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate the effects of ES application on skin vulnerability to external irritants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An experimental study on 12 healthy male subjects (Mean ± SD, 22.9 ± 3.6 years) who completed the study. The subjects were free of skin abnormalities in the volar aspect of both forearms. Three areas were allocated to each forearm and marked as areas 1, 2, and A in the treated forearm, and areas 3, 4, and B in the control forearm. ES was applied to the volar aspect of the treated forearm for 30 min three times a week, for 2 weeks. The effect of ES on skin vulnerability was investigated using 5% and 0.5% sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) patches applied to both treated and control forearms. The skin response to irritants was evaluated using transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and a visual erythema score 24 h after patch removal. RESULTS: Compared to the control forearm, ES increased skin permeability and erythema in response to external irritants (SLS), as measured by the visual analog score (Z = 2.75, p = 0.006) and TEWL (p < 0.05), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ES escalates skin reactions to low concentrations of irritant substances, such as SLS, in the area between the two electrodes. This emphasizes the use of this substance, and similar irritants should be avoided in areas treated with ES.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Irritante , Irritantes , Masculino , Humanos , Irritantes/farmacología , Dermatitis Irritante/etiología , Pérdida Insensible de Agua , Piel , Dodecil Sulfato de Sodio/farmacología , EritemaRESUMEN
Multiple in vitro eye irritation methods have been developed and adopted as OECD health effects test guidelines. However, for predicting the ocular irritation/damage potential of agrochemical formulations there is an applicability domain knowledge gap for most of the methods. To overcome this gap, a retrospective evaluation of 192 agrochemical formulations with in vivo (OECD TG 405) and in vitro (OECD TG 437, 438, and/or 492) data was conducted to determine if the in vitro methods could accurately assign United Nations Globally Harmonized System for Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) eye irritation hazard classifications. In addition, for each formulation the eye irritation classification was derived from the classification of the contained hazardous ingredients and their respective concentration in the product using the GHS concentration threshold (CT) approach. The results herein suggest that the three in vitro methods and the GHS CT approach were highly predictive of formulations that would not require GHS classification for eye irritation. Given most agrochemical formulations fall into this category, methods that accurately identify non-classified agrochemical formulations could significantly reduce the use of animals for this endpoint.
Asunto(s)
Agroquímicos , Irritantes , Animales , Agroquímicos/toxicidad , Agroquímicos/química , Estudios Retrospectivos , Alternativas a las Pruebas en Animales , OjoRESUMEN
Several New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) for hazard assessment of skin sensitisers have been formally validated. However, data regarding their applicability on certain product classes are limited. The purpose of this project was to provide initial evidence on the applicability domain of GARD™skin and GARD™potency for the product class of agrochemical formulations. For this proof of concept, 30 liquid and 12 solid agrochemical formulations were tested in GARDskin for hazard predictions. Formulations predicted as sensitisers were further evaluated in the GARDpotency assay to determine GHS skin sensitisation category. The selected formulations were of product types, efficacy groups and sensitisation hazard classes representative of the industry's products. The performance of GARDskin was estimated by comparing results to existing in vivo animal data. The overall accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 76.2% (32/42), 85.0% (17/20), and 68.2% (15/22), respectively, with the predictivity for liquid formulations being slightly higher compared to the solid formulations. GARDpotency correctly subcategorized 14 out of the 17 correctly predicted sensitisers. Lack of concordance was justifiable by compositional or borderline response analysis. In conclusion, GARDskin and GARDpotency showed satisfactory performance in this initial proof-of-concept study, which supports consideration of agrochemical formulations being within the applicability domain of the test methods.
Asunto(s)
Agroquímicos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Animales , Agroquímicos/química , Irritantes/farmacología , Piel , Bioensayo , Prueba de Estudio Conceptual , Alternativas a las Pruebas en AnimalesRESUMEN
Asthma in the workplace is an important occupational health issue. It comprises various subtypes: occupational asthma (OA; both allergic asthma and irritant-induced asthma) and work-exacerbated asthma (WEA). Current regulatory paradigms for the management of OA are not fit for purpose. There is therefore an important unmet need, for the purposes of both effective human health protection and appropriate and proportionate regulation, that sub-types of work-related asthma can be accurately identified and classified, and that chemical respiratory allergens that drive allergic asthma can be differentiated according to potency. In this article presently available strategies for the diagnosis and characterisation of asthma in the workplace are described and critically evaluated. These include human health studies, clinical investigations and experimental approaches (structure-activity relationships, assessments of chemical reactivity, experimental animal studies and in vitro methods). Each of these approaches has limitations with respect to providing a clear discrimination between OA and WEA, and between allergen-induced and irritant-induced asthma. Against this background the needs for improved characterisation of work-related asthma, in the context of more appropriate regulation is discussed.
Asunto(s)
Asma Ocupacional , Enfermedades Profesionales , Exposición Profesional , Humanos , Animales , Irritantes/toxicidad , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Asma Ocupacional/inducido químicamente , Asma Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Alérgenos/toxicidadRESUMEN
Toxicological assessment of chemicals is crucial for safeguarding human health and the environment. However, traditional animal experiments are associated with ethical, technical, and predictive limitations in assessing the toxicity of chemicals to the skin. With the recent development of bioengineering and tissue engineering, three-dimensional (3D) skin models have been commonly used as an alternative for toxicological studies. The skin consists of the subcutaneous, dermis, and epidermis. All these layers have crucial functions such as physical and biological protection and thermoregulation. The epidermis is the shallowest layer protecting against external substances and media. Because the skin is the first contact point for many substances, this organ is very significant for assessing local toxicity following skin exposure. According to the classification of the United Nations Global Harmonized System, skin irritation is a major potentially hazardous characteristic of chemicals, and this characteristic must be accurately assessed and classified for enhancing chemical safety management and preventing and reducing chemical accidents. This review discusses the research progress of 3D skin models and introduces their application in assessing chemical skin irritation.
Asunto(s)
Pruebas de Irritación de la Piel , Piel , Humanos , Piel/efectos de los fármacos , Pruebas de Irritación de la Piel/métodos , Irritantes/toxicidad , Animales , Alternativas a las Pruebas en Animales/métodos , Ingeniería de Tejidos/métodos , Modelos BiológicosRESUMEN
Irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) is a nonspecific skin inflammation caused by irritants, leading to itch and pain. We tested whether differential responses to histamine-dependent and -independent pruritogens can be evoked in ICD induced by sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS). An ICD mouse model was established with 5% SLS in acetone versus a vehicle topically applied for 24 h to the cheek. Site-directed itch- and pain-like behaviors, occurring spontaneously and in response to mechanical, thermal, and chemical stimuli (histamine, ß-alanine, BAM8-22, and bradykinin) applied to the cheek, were recorded before (day 0) and after irritant removal (days 1, 2, 3, and 4). Skin inflammation was assessed through visual scoring, ultrasound, and measurements of skin thickness. SLS-treated mice exhibited hyperalgesia-like behavior in response to mechanical and heat stimuli on day 1 compared to the controls. SLS mice exhibited more spontaneous wipes (pain) but not scratching bouts (itch) on day 1. Pruritogen injections caused more scratching but not wiping in SLS-treated mice compared to the controls. Only bradykinin increased wiping behavior compared to saline. SLS-treated mice developed noticeable erythema, scaling, and increased skin thickness on days 1 and 2. SLS induced cutaneous inflammation and behavioral signs of spontaneous pain and itching, hyperalgesia to mechanical and heat stimuli and a chemical algogen, and enhanced itch response to pruritogens. These sensory reactions preceded the inflammation peak and lasted up to two days.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Irritante , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Dolor , Prurito , Dodecil Sulfato de Sodio , Animales , Dodecil Sulfato de Sodio/efectos adversos , Prurito/inducido químicamente , Ratones , Dermatitis Irritante/etiología , Dermatitis Irritante/patología , Dermatitis Irritante/fisiopatología , Dolor/inducido químicamente , Dolor/fisiopatología , Masculino , Hiperalgesia/inducido químicamente , Piel/efectos de los fármacos , Piel/patología , Piel/metabolismo , Histamina , Irritantes/toxicidad , Bradiquinina/farmacología , Conducta Animal/efectos de los fármacosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Barrier creams (BCs) are marketed as locally applied medical devices or cosmetic products to protect the skin from exposure to chemicals and irritants. Generally, the mechanism of action of such products is mainly due to the formation of a superficial thin film between the skin and the irritant or sensitizer, thus reducing or totally blocking the cutaneous penetration of such agents. Specifically, studies focusing on the effectiveness of commercial protective creams to prevent nickel cutaneous penetration are extremely scarce. The aim of the current work, therefore, is to evaluate the protective role of a commercially available barrier cream for nickel and compare the results with a simple moisturizing, following exposure to Ni powder. METHODS: Marketed BCs were evaluated and tested. Human skin absorption of Ni was studied in vitro using static Franz diffusion cells. RESULTS: Our results demonstrate that the application of both formulations caused a reduction of Ni inside the skin (8.00 ± 3.35 µg cm-2 for the barrier cream and 22.6 ± 12.6 µg cm-2 for the general moisturizing product), with the specialized barrier cream being statistically (p = 0.015) more efficient on forming a protective barrier, thus evidencing the importance of some ingredients in such formulations on the nickel dermal accumulation. CONCLUSIONS: The composition of the formulations based on film-forming or chelating agents may play an imperative role in reducing the cutaneous penetration of Ni.
OBJECTIF: Les crèmes de barrière (CB) sont commercialisées en tant que dispositifs médicaux ou produits cosmétiques appliqués localement pour protéger la peau contre l'exposition aux produits chimiques et irritants. En général, le mécanisme d'action de ces produits est principalement dû à la formation d'un film mince superficiel entre la peau et l'irritant ou le sensibilisant, réduisant ainsi ou bloquant totalement la pénétration cutanée de ces agents. Plus précisément, les études portant sur l'efficacité des crèmes protectrices commercialisées pour prévenir la pénétration cutanée du nickel sont extrêmement rares. L'objectif du projet en cours est donc d'évaluer le rôle protecteur d'une crème barrière disponible dans le commerce contre le nickel et de comparer les résultats à un simple hydratant après une exposition à la poudre de Ni. MÉTHODES: Des CB commercialisées ont été évaluées et testées. L'absorption cutanée du Ni dans la peau humaine a été étudiée in vitro à l'aide de cellules de diffusion statiques de Franz. RÉSULTATS: Nos résultats démontrent que l'application des deux formulations a entraîné une réduction du taux de Ni à l'intérieur de la peau (8,00 ± 3,35 µg·cm-2 pour la crème barrière et 22,6 ± 12,6 µg·cm-2 pour le produit hydratant ordinaire), la crème barrière spécialisée étant statistiquement (p = 0,015) plus efficace pour former une barrière protectrice, démontrant ainsi l'importance de certains ingrédients dans ces formulations sur l'accumulation dermique du nickel. CONCLUSIONS: La composition des formulations basées sur des agents de formation de film ou de chélation peut jouer un rôle nécessaire pour réduire la pénétration cutanée du Ni.
Asunto(s)
Cosméticos , Níquel , Humanos , Níquel/farmacología , Polvos , Piel , Emolientes/farmacología , Cosméticos/farmacología , Irritantes/farmacologíaRESUMEN
Consumer product manufacturers utilise a spectrum of alternative ocular irritation assays, as these tests do not require the use of live animals. Despite their usefulness, no regulatory-accepted assay assesses the reversibility of ocular damage, a key criterion of GHS ocular classification, like the rabbit eye test (i.e., Draize Rabbit Eye Test [DRET]) . The Porcine Corneal Opacity Reversibility Assay (PorCORA), an ex vivo intact corneal tissue culture model, predicts the reversibility of damage by ocular irritants. Inclusion of the damage reversibility endpoint in the PorCORA supplements other alternative test methods for ocular irritation, by assessing induced eye damage and the ability of this damage to reverse (heal) without the use of live animals to distinguish between Globally Harmonised System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) ocular classifications. In this focused study, results of a Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) test of a laundry detergent, neat and 10% dilution, (product mixture from S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. [SCJ]) classified the product into GHS Category 1; however, the BCOP test cannot assess the reversibility of ocular damage. The laundry detergent was evaluated using the PorCORA, where ocular damage induced by the detergent was fully reversed within seven days. Evaluation of the reversibility of ocular damage using the PorCORA in this focused study can add strength to the weight-of-evidence (WoE) analysis approach in ocular hazard assessment. This WoE approach strengthens the argument that the PorCORA can be used to supplement BCOP data, and that this laundry detergent is not an irreversible eye irritant.
Asunto(s)
Opacidad de la Córnea , Detergentes , Animales , Bovinos , Porcinos , Conejos , Detergentes/toxicidad , Alternativas a las Pruebas en Animales , Ojo , Opacidad de la Córnea/inducido químicamente , Córnea , Irritantes/toxicidadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Prototype cosmetic formulations containing short-chain acids and alcohols intended to be applied in the proximity of the eyes are sometimes evaluated for ocular irritation potential using the validated Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Assay (OECD TG 437). We evaluated the eye irritation potential of nine experimental cosmetic formulations designed and prepared by Avon Global Reserach and Development to differ only in the concentrations of Ethanol, Glycolic Acid and Salicylic Acid. METHODS: We analysed the data generated using the BCOP assay. The opacity and permeability values obtained following the exposure of bovine corneas to experimental cosmetic formulations were combined into a single In Vitro Irritancy Score used to rank eye irritation potential. Histopathological examination of treated corneas was used to provide additional information about the depth and degree of the injury and to support the prediction of eye irritation potential of each experimental cosmetic formulation. RESULTS: The In Vitro Irritancy Scores and histopathological analysis showed that experimental formulations containing only Ethanol, Glycolic Acid, or Salicylic Acid alone had, at most, a mild ocular irritation potential. The experimental formulations containing both Ethanol and Glycolic Acid had a mild ocular irritation potential, while the experimental formulations containing both Ethanol and Salicylic Acid had a moderate ocular irritation potential. Severe ocular irritation potential was induced by an experimental formulation containing a combination of Glycolic Acid and Salicylic Acid and it was further accentuated by the addition of Ethanol to the formulation. Our data indicate a possible synergistic effect on eye irritation potential of Ethanol, Glycolic Acid and Salicylic Acid in at least some experimental cosmetic formulations. Further, our results provide insight on an apparent concentration-dependent ocular irritation potential effect of combinations of Glycolic Acid, Salicylic Acid and Ethanol in at least one experimental cosmetic formulation. CONCLUSIONS: The results presented herein emphasise the need to consider in vitro testing of prototype cosmetic formulations containing combinations of Ethanol, Glycolic Acid and Salicylic Acid rather than relying on any predicted additive effect on ocular irritation based solely on previously generated results of similar formulations containing Ethanol, Glycolic Acid or Salicylic Acid alone. Further work is required to understand the significance of these observations and to elucidate the mechanisms responsible for the apparent synergistic effects of Glycolic Acid, Salicylic Acid and Ethanol and eye irritation potential suggested by our results.
Asunto(s)
Córnea , Cosméticos , Etanol , Glicolatos , Irritantes , Ácido Salicílico , Animales , Glicolatos/toxicidad , Glicolatos/administración & dosificación , Ácido Salicílico/toxicidad , Ácido Salicílico/administración & dosificación , Bovinos , Cosméticos/toxicidad , Etanol/toxicidad , Etanol/química , Irritantes/toxicidad , Córnea/efectos de los fármacos , Córnea/patología , Permeabilidad , Opacidad de la Córnea/inducido químicamenteRESUMEN
Many sectors have seen complete replacement of the in vivo rabbit eye test with reproducible and relevant in vitro and ex vivo methods to assess the eye corrosion/irritation potential of chemicals. However, the in vivo rabbit eye test remains the standard test used for agrochemical formulations in some countries. Therefore, two defined approaches (DAs) for assessing conventional agrochemical formulations were developed, using the EpiOcularTM Eye Irritation Test (EIT) [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) test guideline (TG) 492] and the Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (OECD TG 437; BCOP) test with histopathology. Presented here are the results from testing 29 agrochemical formulations, which were evaluated against the United States Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) pesticide classification system, and assessed using orthogonal validation, rather than direct concordance analysis with the historical in vivo rabbit eye data. Scientific confidence was established by evaluating the methods and testing results using an established framework that considers fitness for purpose, human biological relevance, technical characterisation, data integrity and transparency, and independent review. The in vitro and ex vivo methods used in the DAs were demonstrated to be as or more fit for purpose, reliable and relevant than the in vivo rabbit eye test. Overall, there is high scientific confidence in the use of these DAs for assessing the eye corrosion/irritation potential of agrochemical formulations.