The impact of socioeconomic determinants on the access to care and survival in patients with spinal chordomas- a national cancer database analysis.

PURPOSE: Chordomas are rare malignant neoplasms primarily treated surgically. Disparities related to race and socioeconomic status, may affect patient outcomes. This study aims to identify prognostic factors for access to care and survival in patients with spinal chordomas. METHODS: The NCDB database was queried between the years 2004 and 2017. Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed to compare survival probabilities among different groups, based on race and socioeconomic determinents. RESULTS: 1769 patients were identified, with 87% being White, 5% Hispanic, 4% Black, and Asian each. The mean age was 61.3 years. Most patients received care at academic/research centers and lived in a large metropolitan area, with no difference between races. A significantly higher percentage of Black patients did not undergo surgery (p < 0.001), with no statistically significant difference in survival between races (p = 0.97). A higher survival probability was seen in patients with other government insurances (p < 0.0001), in higher income quartiles (p < 0.0001), in metropolitan areas (p = 0.023), and at an academic/research center (p < 0.0001). A lower survival probability was seen in patients who are uninsured, in rural areas, and at community cancer programs (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: This study highlights disparities in access to surgical intervention for patients with spinal chordomas, especially among Black individuals. It emphasizes the significant impact of insurance status and income on access to surgical care and highlights geographical and institutional variations in survival rates. Addressing socioeconomic differences is crucial for fostering equity in neurosurgical outcomes.

Updates in the Management of Metastatic Spine Disease.

The number of cancer diagnoses continues to increase each year in the United States, and given the propensity for bone metastases from solid organ malignancies, orthopaedic spine surgeons will inevitably encounter patients with metastatic spine disease and need to have a framework for approaching the evaluation and treatment of these complex patients. Many patients seeking care for spinal metastases already have a history of disseminated malignancy, but metastatic spine disease itself will be the presenting symptom of cancer in approximately 20% of patients. Because the first presentation of cancer may be to a spine surgeon, an appropriate strategy for the initial evaluation of a patient with a new spinal lesion is critical to establish the diagnosis of metastatic disease before undergoing treatment. Once the diagnosis of metastatic spine disease is confirmed, decisions regarding treatment should be made in coordination with a multidisciplinary team including radiation oncology and medical oncology. Spinal metastases are most often treated with radiation therapy. Direct circumferential decompression of the spinal cord with postoperative radiation therapy is considered for high-grade epidural spinal cord compression to preserve neurologic function. Mechanical spinal instability is another potential indication for surgery. When considering surgery, the patient's medical fitness, systemic burden of cancer, and overall prognosis all must be accounted for, and the importance of multidisciplinary evaluation and shared decision making cannot be overstated.

Malignant spinal cord compression in the paediatric population-a systematic review, meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Malignant spinal cord compression (MSCC) has been noted in 3-5% of children with primary tumours. MSCC can be associated with permanent neurological deficits and prompt treatment is necessary. Our aim was to perform a systematic review on MSCC in children < 18 years to help formulate national guidelines. METHODS: A systematic review of the English language was undertaken using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Search criteria included 'MSCC in children, paediatric and metastases' for papers published between January1999 and December 2022. Isolated case reports/case series with < 10 patients were excluded. RESULTS: From a total of 17 articles identified, a final 7 were analysed (Level III/IV). Neuroblastoma constituted the most common cause for MSCC in children (62.7%) followed by sarcoma (14.2%). Soft tissue sarcomas were the most frequent cause of MSCC in children > 5 years old, while for neuroblastomas, the mean age of presentation was 20 months. The median age at time of diagnosis for the entire cohort of patients was 50.9 months (14.8-139). The median follow-up duration was 50.7 months (0.5-204). Motor deficits were the presenting symptom in 95.6% of children followed by pain in 65.4% and sphincter disturbance in 24%. There was a delay of about 26.05 days (7-600) between the onset of symptoms and diagnosis. A multimodality approach to treatment was utilised depending on the primary tumour. The prognosis for neurological recovery was found to be inversely proportional to the degree of neurological deficits and duration of symptoms in four studies. CONCLUSION: Neuroblastoma is the most common cause for MSCC in children (62.7%) followed by sarcoma (14.2%), whilst soft tissue sarcomas constituted the most frequent cause of MSCC in children > 5 years old. The majority of patients presented with motor deficit, followed by pain. In children with neuroblastoma /lymphoma, chemotherapy was the primary treatment. Early surgery should be a consideration with rapid deterioration of neurology despite chemotherapy. A multimodality approach including chemo-radiotherapy and surgery should be the treatment of choice in metastatic sarcomas. It is worth noting that multi-level laminectomy/decompression and asymmetrical radiation to the spine can lead to spinal column deformity in the future.

Metastatic Lesions of the Brain and Spine.

Brain and spinal metastases are common in cancer patients and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Continued advancement in the systemic care of cancer has increased the life expectancy of patients, and consequently, the incidence of brain and spine metastasis has increased. There has been an increase in the understanding of oncogenic mutations, and research has also demonstrated spatial and temporal mutations in patients that may drive overall treatment resistance and failure. Combinatory treatments with radiation, surgery, and newer systemic therapies have continued to increase the life expectancy of patients with brain and spine metastases. Given the overall complexity of brain and spine metastases, this chapter aims to give a comprehensive overview and cover important topics concerning brain and spine metastases. This will include the molecular, genetic, radiographic, surgical, and non-surgical treatments of brain and spinal metastases.

Malignant Spinal Tumors.

Malignant spinal tumors constitute around 22% of all primary spinal tumors. The most common location of metastases to the spinal region is the extradural compartment. The molecular and genetic characterization of these tumors was the basis for the updated WHO classification of CNS tumors in 2016, where many CNS tumors are now diagnosed according to their genetic profile rather than relying solely on the histopathological appearance. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the current gold standard for the initial evaluation and subsequent follow-up on intradural spinal cord tumors, and the imaging sequences must include T2-weighted images (WI), short time inversion recovery (STIR), and pre- and post-contrast T1-WI in the axial, sagittal, and coronal planes. The clinical presentation is highly variable and depends on the tumor size, growth rate, type, infiltrative, necrotic and hemorrhagic potential as well as the exact location within the spinal compartment. Surgical intervention remains the mainstay of management of symptomatic and radiographically enlarging spinal tumors, where the goal is to achieve maximal safe resection. Tumor recurrences are managed with repeat surgical resection (preferred whenever possible and safe), radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or any combination of these therapies.

A novel nomogram to stratify quality of life among advanced cancer patients with spinal metastatic disease after examining demographics, dietary habits, therapeutic interventions, and mental health status.

BACKGROUND: It would be very helpful to stratify patients and direct patient selection if risk factors for quality of life were identified in a particular population. Nonetheless, it is still challenging to forecast the health-related quality of life among individuals with spinal metastases. The goal of this study was to stratify patient's populations for whom the assessment of quality of life should be encouraged by developing and validating a nomogram to predict the quality of life among advanced cancer patients with spine metastases. METHODS: This study prospectively analyzed 208 advanced cancer patients with spine metastases, and collected their general characteristics, food preferences, addictions, comorbidities, therapeutic strategies, and mental health status. The functional assessment of cancer therapy-general (FACT-G) and hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) were used to assess quality of life and mental health, respectively. The complete cohort of patients was randomly divided into two groups: a training set and a validation set. Patients from the training set were conducted to train and develop a nomogram, while patients in the validation set were performed to internally validate the nomogram. The nomogram contained significant variables discovered using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) approach in conjunction with 10-fold cross-validation. The nomogram's predictive ability was assessed utilizing discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness. Internal validation was also completed using the bootstrap method after applying 500 iterations of procedures. A web calculator was also developed to promote clinical practice. RESULTS: Advance cancer patients with spinal metastases had an extremely low quality of life, as indicated by the average FACT-G score of just 60.32 ± 20.41. According to the LASSO and 10-fold cross-validation, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score, having an uncompleted life goal, preference for eating vegetables, chemotherapy, anxiety status, and depression status were selected as nomogram predictors. In the training set, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.84-0.96), while in the validation set, it was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.78-0.93). They were 0.50 (95% CI: 0.41-0.58) and 0.44 (95% CI: 0.33-0.56), respectively, for the discrimination slopes. The nomogram had favorable capacity to calibrate and was clinically useful, according to the calibration curve and decision curve analysis. When compared to patients in the low-risk group, patients in the high-risk group were above four times more likely to experience a poor quality of life (82.18% vs. 21.50%, P < 0.001). In comparison to patients in the low-risk group, patients in the high-risk group also exhibited significant higher levels of anxiety and depression. The webpage for the web calculator was https://starshiny.shinyapps.io/DynNomapp-lys/ . CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests a nomogram that can be applied as a practical clinical tool to forecast and categorize the quality of life among patients with spine metastases. Additionally, patients with poor quality of life experience more severe anxiety and depression. Effective interventions should be carried out as soon as possible, especially for patients in the high-risk group, to improve their quality of life and mental health condition.

Overview of the management of primary tumors of the spine.

STUDY DESIGN: Narrative review. OBJECTIVE: To provide a narrative review for diagnosis and management of Primary spine tumors. METHODS: A detailed review of literature was done to identify relevant and well cited manuscripts to construct this narrative review. RESULTS: Primary tumors of the spine are rare with some racial differences reported. There are numerous adjuvant technologies and developments that influence the way we currently manage these tumors. Collimated radiation allows for heavy dosage to be delivered and have been reported to give good local control both as an adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting. These have made surgical decision making even more intricate needing a multicentric approach. Dedicated care has been shown to significantly improve health quality of life measures and survival. CONCLUSION: While, it is beyond the scope of this paper to discuss all primary tumors subtypes individually, this review highlights the developments and approach to primary spine tumors.

Current and Emerging Approaches for Spine Tumor Treatment.

Spine tumors represent a significant social and medical problem, affecting the quality of life of thousands of patients and imposing a burden on healthcare systems worldwide. Encompassing a wide range of diseases, spine tumors require prompt multidisciplinary treatment strategies, being mainly approached through chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgical interventions, either alone or in various combinations. However, these conventional tactics exhibit a series of drawbacks (e.g., multidrug resistance, tumor recurrence, systemic adverse effects, invasiveness, formation of large bone defects) which limit their application and efficacy. Therefore, recent research focused on finding better treatment alternatives by utilizing modern technologies to overcome the challenges associated with conventional treatments. In this context, the present paper aims to describe the types of spine tumors and the most common current treatment alternatives, further detailing the recent developments in anticancer nanoformulations, personalized implants, and enhanced surgical techniques.

Novel therapeutic strategies for spinal osteosarcomas.

At the dawn of the third millennium, cancer has become the bane of twenty-first century man, and remains a predominant public health burden, affecting welfare and life expectancy globally. Spinal osteogenic sarcoma, a primary spinal malignant tumor, is a rare and challenging neoplastic disease to treat. After the conventional therapeutic modalities of chemotherapy, radiation and surgery have been exhausted, there is currently no available alternative therapy in managing cases of spinal osteosarcoma. The defining signatures of tumor survival are characterised by cancer cell ability to stonewall immunogenic attrition and apoptosis by various means. Some of these biomarkers, namely immune-checkpoints, have recently been exploited as druggable targets in osteosarcoma and many other different cancers. These promising strides made by the use of reinvigorated immunotherapeutic approaches may lead to significant reduction in spinal osteosarcoma disease burden and corresponding reciprocity in increase of survival rates. In this review, we provide the background to spinal osteosarcoma, and proceed to elaborate on contribution of the complex ecology within tumor microenvironment giving arise to cancerous immune escape, which is currently receiving considerable attention. We follow this section on the tumor microenvironment by a brief history of cancer immunity. Also, we draw on the current knowledge of treatment gained from incidences of osteosarcoma at other locations of the skeleton (long bones of the extremities in close proximity to the metaphyseal growth plates) to make a case for application of immunity-based tools, such as immune-checkpoint inhibitors and vaccines, and draw attention to adverse upshots of immune-checkpoint blockers as well. Finally, we describe the novel biotechnique of CRISPR/Cas9 that will assist in treatment approaches for personalized medication.

Spine metastasis in patients with prostate cancer: Survival prognosis assessment.

BACKGROUND: Patients presenting spine metastasis (SpM) from prostate cancer (PC) form a heterogeneous population, through this study, we aimed to clarify and update their prognostic assessment. METHODS: The patient data used in this study was obtained from a French national multicenter database of patients treated for PC with SpM between 2014 and 2017. A total of 72 patients and 365 SpM cases were diagnosed. RESULTS: The median overall survival time for all patients following the event of SpM was 28.8 months. First, we identified three significant survival prognostic factors of PC patients with SpM: good Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/World Health Organization personnel status (Status 0 hazard ratio [HR]: 0.031, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.008-0.127; p < .0001) or (Status 1 HR: 0.163, 95% CI: 0.068-0.393; p < .0001) and SpM radiotherapy (HR: 2.923, 95% CI: 1.059-8.069; p < .0001). Secondly, the presence of osteolytic lesions of the spine (vs. osteoblastic) was found to represent an independent prognosis factor for longer survival [HR: 0.424, 95% CI: 0.216-0.830; p = .01]. Other factors including the number of SpM, surgery, extraspinal metastasis, synchrone metastasis, metastasis-free survival, and SpM recurrence were not identified as being prognostically relevant to the survival of patients with PC. CONCLUSION: Survival and our ability to estimate it in patients presenting PC with SpM have improved significantly. Therefore, we advocate the relevance of updating SpM prognostic scoring algorithms by incorporating data regarding the timeline of PC as well as the presence of osteolytic SpM to conceive treatments that are adapted to each patient.

Expectations of treatment outcomes in patients with spinal metastases; what do we tell our patients? A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Realistic pre-treatment expectations are important and have been associated with post-treatment health related quality of life (HRQOL). Patient expectations are greatly influenced by physicians, as they are the primary resource for information. This study aimed to explore the communication practices of physicians regarding treatment outcomes for patients with spinal metastases, and physician experiences with patients' pre-treatment expectations. METHODS: An international qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with physicians routinely involved in treating metastatic spine disease (spine surgeons, radiation and medical oncologists, and rehabilitation specialists) was conducted. Physicians were interviewed about the content and extent of information they provide to patients with spinal metastases regarding treatment options, risks and treatment outcomes. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using a thematic coding network. RESULTS: After 22 interviews data saturation occurred. The majority of the physicians indicated that they currently do not establish patients' pre-treatment expectations, despite acknowledging the importance of these expectations. Spine surgeons often believe that patient expectations are disproportionate. Physicians expressed they manage expectations by detailing the most common risks and providing a broad but nonspecific overview of treatment outcomes. While the palliative intent seems clear to the physicians, their perception is that the implications of a palliative treatment remains elusive to most patients. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the current gap in patient-physician communication regarding expectations of treatment outcomes of patients with spinal metastases. These results warrant further research to improve communication practices and determine the effect of patient expectations on patient reported outcomes in this population.

Laser interstitial thermotherapy (LITT) for the treatment of tumors of the brain and spine: a brief review.

INTRODUCTION: Laser Interstitial Thermotherapy (LITT; also known as Stereotactic Laser Ablation or SLA), is a minimally invasive treatment modality that has recently gained prominence in the treatment of malignant primary and metastatic brain tumors and radiation necrosis and studies for treatment of spinal metastasis has recently been reported. METHODS: Here we provide a brief literature review of the various contemporary uses for LITT and their reported outcomes. RESULTS: Historically, the primary indication for LITT has been for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). However, indications have continued to expand and now include gliomas of different grades, brain metastasis (BM), radiation necrosis (RN), other types of brain tumors as well as spine metastasis. LITT is emerging as a safe, reliable, minimally invasive clinical approach, particularly for deep seated, focal malignant brain tumors and radiation necrosis. The role of LITT for treatment of other types of tumors of the brain and for spine tumors appears to be evolving at a small number of centers. While the technology appears to be safe and increasingly utilized, there have been few prospective clinical trials and most published studies combine different pathologies in the same report. CONCLUSION: Well-designed prospective trials will be required to firmly establish the role of LITT in the treatment of lesions of the brain and spine.

Uncertainties that threaten the benefit/risk balance in early treatment lines for advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma.

Sarcoma oncologists face many uncertainties which can threaten the benefit/risk balance during early management of patients with advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. This point is illustrated by a clinical case involving an elderly patient with comorbidities and a diagnosis of metastatic leiomyosarcoma. The patient was not a candidate for doxorubicin-based chemotherapy because of his cardiac history and was hesitant about systemic chemotherapy, ultimately expressing a preference for a well-tolerated regimen. After evaluating the treatment alternatives, trabectedin was chosen based on its indication for use in persons unsuited to receive anthracyclines and evidence supporting its efficacy and safety in elderly patients. The patient received 17 cycles of trabectedin for a best response of stable disease with good quality of life.

Utility of spinal angiography and arterial embolization in patients undergoing CT guided alcohol injection of aggressive vertebral hemangiomas.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the role of spinal angiography and arterial embolization in avoiding spinal cord ischemia in patients undergoing CT-guided alcohol injection of aggressive vertebral hemangiomas. METHODS: In this retrospective study, patients with vertebral hemangioma who underwent CT-guided direct alcohol injection between January 2007 and October 2018 were identified. Of 28 such patients, 26 had neurological deficits, and 2 had only back pain or radiculopathy. Direct alcohol injection without prior arterial embolization was done in 17 patients. Direct alcohol injection with prior arterial embolization was done in 11 patients. Clinical outcome was assessed immediately after the intervention and at follow-up. RESULTS: Three patients, who underwent alcohol injection without trans-arterial embolization, had worsening of neurological deficits in the post procedure period due to spinal cord ischemia. No complications related to spinal cord ischemia were noted in the embolization group. There was no significant difference in the outcomes between the two groups if the three patients with complications are excluded (p = 0.34). CONCLUSION: While CT-guided direct alcohol injection is effective in the management of symptomatic and aggressive vertebral hemangiomas, spinal angiography and trans-arterial embolization of the blood supply to the vertebral body hemangioma, prior to the direct transpedicular alcohol embolization of the lesion, improves the safety of the procedure.

Benign leiomyoma with multiple metastases to vertebrae and calvarium: An index case with comprehensive review of endocrine targets.

"Benign" metastatic leiomyomas (BML) are indolently growing metastatic tumors which mostly associate with uterine leiomyomas in women in reproductive ages. The reason to define these lesions as "benign" despite metastasis is their pathological features with low mitotic counts, lack of or minimal nuclear atypia, pseudocyst formation, and coagulative necrosis unlike leiomyosarcomas. Despite lack of pathological malignant features, they may cause significant morbidity and even mortality. Here, we describe a BML case with metastases to vertebrae and skull bones. Vertebral and skull metastases of BMLs were very rarely reported. In treatment of these tumors, hysterectomy and GnRH modifier treatments are widely employed. GnRH agonists act by desensitization and downregulation of the GnRH receptors, while GnRH antagonists act via the canonical competitive blockage. These treatments reduce FSH and LH levels, thereby reducing the systemic levels of sex steroids which stimulate leiomyoma growth. However, leiomyomas inherently harbor aromatase activity and synthesize their own estrogen; hence, treatment with systemic estrogen antagonists may provide better tumor control. Another important factor in BML pathogenesis is progesterone, and both progesterone receptor antagonists and high-dose progesterone receptor agonists may reduce BML growth. Following surgical treatment of the calvarial mass and radiotherapy of the vertebral metastatic foci, our BML case was successfully managed with hysterectomy and anastrozole treatment. Higher awareness of BML cases and their molecular endocrinological features in the neurosurgical community may pave to develop better strategies for treatment of these tumors causing high morbidity.

The role of percutaneous transarterial embolization in the management of spinal bone tumors: a literature review.

PURPOSE: Spinal bone tumors include a heterogeneous broad of primary or metastatic lesions that may present as incidental findings or manifest with painful symptoms and pathological fractures. Optimal management of spine bone lesions is often difficult and treatment algorithms are usually solidly based on surgery. We aimed to evaluate the contribution of trans-arterial embolization in this field, with particular attention to the procedure efficacy, technical difficulties and complications. METHODS: We present a literature review on the role of trans-arterial embolization in the management of spinal bone tumors, both primary and metastatic, evaluating its contribution as preoperative treatment, palliative procedure and standalone curative strategy. RESULTS: Trans-arterial embolization provides an important contribution to reducing surgery hemorrhagic risks, offering a better visualization of the operating field, and possibly increasing tumor susceptibility to chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Nonetheless, it plays an important part in pain palliation, with the unquestionable advantage of being easily repeatable in case of necessity. Its curative role as a standalone therapy is still subject of debate, and at the present time, satisfactory results have been recorded only in the treatment of aneurysmal bone cysts. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous trans-arterial embolization has established as a highly useful minimally invasive procedure in the management of spinal bone lesions, particularly as adjuvant preoperative therapy and palliative treatment.

Minimally Invasive Spinal Stabilization with Denosumab before Total Spondylectomy for a Collapsing Lower Lumbar Spinal Giant Cell Tumor.

A 21-year-old man consulted our hospital for treatment of a spinal giant cell tumor (GCT) of Enneking stage III. Lower lumbar-spine tumors and severe spinal canal stenosis are associated with high risk for surgical mor-bidity. Stability was temporarily secured with a percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in combination with deno-sumab, which shrank the tumor. Total en bloc spondylectomy was then performed 6 months after initiation of denosumab, and the patient was followed for 3 years. There was no local recurrence, and bony fusion was obtained. Minimally invasive surgery and denosumab allowed safer and easier treatment of a collapsing lower lumbar extra-compartmental GCT.

Surgical Strategy of Pediatric Benign Sacral Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Primary benign osseous tumors and tumor-like lesions at the sacrum are rare in the pediatric population and exact surgical strategy is still unclear. In this study, we evaluate the outcome for pediatric patients with benign tumors and tumor-like lesions at the sacrum who were receiving surgical treatment according to our proposed surgical strategy and classification. METHODS: We analyzed 49 pediatric patients with sacral benign tumors or tumor-like lesions aged 18 years and below from 2005 to 2018. There were 23 men and 26 women with a mean age of 14.0±3.8 years. Nineteen patients had giant cell tumors (GCTs), 9 aneurysmal bone cysts, 5 osteoblastomas, 5 neurogenic tumors, 3 hemangiomas, 3 teratomas, 2 Langerhans cell histiocytosis, 1 chondroblastoma, 1 fibrous dysplasia, and 1 GCT of tendon sheath. We proposed our surgical plan and surgical classification for pediatric patients with sacral benign tumors or tumor-like lesions. RESULTS: The mean follow-up duration was 6.2 years (range, 1.0 to 18.9 y). GCTs (39%, 19/49) and primary aneurysmal bone cysts (18%, 9/49) are the top 2 common histologic types. Preoperative selective arterial embolization (SAE) was performed in 12 cases and 24 patients received intraoperative aortic balloon occlusion (ABO) as the preoperative surgical plan. Furthermore, according to tumor location at the sacrum, we classified surgical excision of sacral benign tumors and tumor-like lesions into 3 types. Fourteen cases were classified as type I, 27 as type II, 3 as type III, and 5 patients with neurogenic tumors cannot be classified into this surgical classification. Ten patients had wound complications. Two had femoral artery thrombosis because of ABO application. One had mechanical failure. Rate of local recurrence was 16%. Seven patients with GCTs and 1 with neurogenic tumor had local recurrence. No patient died of disease at the last follow-up. For the assessment of neurological function, the rate of neurological dysfunction was 12% (6/49). Four cases had urinary incontinence, 3 fecal incontinence, and 3 had bowel obstruction. Next, univariate analysis for influence of preoperative SAE and intraoperative ABO on complications demonstrated that both of them exerted no significant influence on the occurrence of oncological and nononcological complications. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed surgical strategy can provide an excellent therapeutic effect for pediatric benign tumors and tumor-like lesions at the sacrum. Preoperative SAE and intraoperative ABO can safeguard pediatric patients with high vascularity of benign tumor at the sacrum during the operation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

[Physical therapy for vertebrogenic pain syndrome in patients with non-aggressive vertebral hemangioma]. / Rezul'taty primeneniya fizicheskikh metodov lecheniya patsientov s vertebrogennymi bolevymi sindromami pri nalichii neagressivnoi gemangiomy pozvonka.

The vertebral hemangioma (VH) and vertebrogenic pain syndromes of other etiologies are currently not a problem in terms of the choice of treatment method. However, the combination of these conditions makes the situation much more challenging. The question of the safety of physical treatment methods in these patients remains open, since there is no scientific evidence in this area. OBJECTIVE: To study the long-term results of electrotherapy, magnet therapy, lazer therapy, therapeutic exercises (TE), and therapeutic massage (in different combinations) in patients with degenerative-dystrophic processes of the spine and nonaggressive VH. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 104 patients (75 females, 29 males) with degenerative-dystrophic processes of the spine and non-aggressive VH. The time between the treatment course and follow-up examination was 12 months. RESULTS: VHs remained unchanged in 86.5% of patients. An increase in size was noted in 13.5%. In no case did the VH become aggressive. After the TE course, the rate of VH size increase was 10.8%. The combination of TE with massage and electrotherapy (including a combination of all methods) resulted in an increase in VH size in 17.9, 20.0, 23.8% of cases, respectively. When magnet therapy was used, an increase in VH size was recorded significantly less frequently (p=0.021). No differences in the rate of VH size increase depending on sex, age (40-70 years), localization, and size were observed. In case of multiple VHs, the rate of growth was 23.1. CONCLUSION: A limitation of the study was the relatively small number of patients, which could, in some cases, affect the correctness of statistical data. Nevertheless, there is a general trend of the effect of physical treatments on the course of non-aggressive VH in patients with vertebrogenic pain syndromes. Such patients may be recommended low-frequency low-intensity electro- and magnet therapy, therapeutic back massage, and TE.

Contemporary management of pediatric spinal tumors: a single institute's experience in Taiwan in the modern era.

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric spinal tumors are unique pathologies treated by pediatric neurosurgeons. Special attention is required for the preservation of neural function and bony alignment. We reported our experience in the management of these challenging lesions. METHODS: A total of 75 pediatric patients with spinal tumors treated at the National Taiwan University Hospital from 1998 to 2018 were identified retrospectively. Clinical data, radiographic image, and pathological report were reviewed for analysis. RESULTS: There were 37 females and 38 males. The median age was 9 years. Thirty-eight tumors (50.6%) were extradural, 20 (26.7%) intradural extramedullary, and 17 (22.6%) intramedullary. The most common pathologies were glioma, ependymoma, and neuroblastoma. The rate of total and subtotal resection was 45.3% and 21.3%. Thirty-four patients (45.3%) required post-operative adjuvant therapy. Eight patients (10.6%) with spinal deformity had simultaneous tumor excision and spinal fusion surgery. Additional six (8%) patients had subsequent spinal fixation and fusion for deformity after primary tumor operation. Eighty-four percent of patients were ambulatory 3 years after operation. For patients with intradural extramedullary and intramedullary tumors, worse survival outcome was associated with tumor derived from CSF seeding and cranial involvement of spinal tumor, while poorer functional outcome was correlated with cranial involvement and adjuvant therapy with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric spinal tumor surgery carries low surgical morbidity and mortality under current standard of neurosurgical practice. Post-operative adjuvant therapy is required for nearly half of the cases. Spinal deformity requires special attention and sometimes surgical correction. Contemporary management of pediatric spinal tumors enables effective ablation of the lesion and delivers favorable outcome for the majority of patients.