Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 117
Filtrar
Más filtros

Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 79(4): 1010-1017, 2024 Oct 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39106450

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hospital-acquired (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) are important complications early (<30 days) after lung transplantation (LT). However, current incidence, associated factors, and outcomes are not well reported. METHODS: LT recipients transplanted at our institution (July 2019-January 2020 and October 2021-November 2022) were prospectively included. We assessed incidence and presentation of pneumonia and evaluated the impact of associated factors using regression models. We also evaluated molecular relatedness of respiratory pathogens collected peri-transplant and at pneumonia occurrence using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). RESULTS: In the first 30 days post-LT, 25/270 (9.3%) recipients were diagnosed with pneumonia (68% [17/25] VAP; 32% [8/25] HAP). Median time to pneumonia was 11 days (IQR, 7-13); 49% (132/270) of donor and 16% (44/270) of recipient respiratory peri-transplant cultures were positive. However, pathogens associated with pneumonia were not genetically related to either donor or recipient cultures at transplant, as determined by PFGE. Diagnosed pulmonary hypertension (HR, 4.42; 95% CI, 1.62-12.08) and immunosuppression use (HR, 2.87; 95% CI, 1.30-6.56) were pre-transplant factors associated with pneumonia. Pneumonia occurrence was associated with longer hospital stay (HR, 5.44; 95% CI, 2.22-13.37) and VAP with longer ICU stay (HR, 4.31; 95% CI, 1.73-10.75) within the first 30 days post-transplantation; 30- and 90-day mortality were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Prospectively assessed early pneumonia incidence occurred in ∼10% of LT. Populations at increased risk for pneumonia occurrence include LT with pre-transplant pulmonary hypertension and pre-transplant immunosuppression. Pneumonia was associated with increased healthcare use, highlighting the need for further improvements by preferentially targeting higher-risk patients.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Pulmón , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador , Humanos , Trasplante de Pulmón/efectos adversos , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/epidemiología , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/microbiología , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Prospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Incidencia , Adulto , Factores de Riesgo , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/epidemiología , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/microbiología , Anciano , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología
2.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 30(6): 1088-1095, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38781685

RESUMEN

The characteristics of severe human parainfluenza virus (HPIV)-associated pneumonia in adults have not been well evaluated. We investigated epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of 143 patients with severe HPIV-associated pneumonia during 2010-2019. HPIV was the most common cause (25.2%) of severe virus-associated hospital-acquired pneumonia and the third most common cause (15.7%) of severe virus-associated community-acquired pneumonia. Hematologic malignancy (35.0%), diabetes mellitus (23.8%), and structural lung disease (21.0%) were common underlying conditions. Co-infections occurred in 54.5% of patients admitted to an intensive care unit. The 90-day mortality rate for HPIV-associated pneumonia was comparable to that for severe influenza virus-associated pneumonia (55.2% vs. 48.4%; p = 0.22). Ribavirin treatment was not associated with lower mortality rates. Fungal co-infections were associated with 82.4% of deaths. Clinicians should consider the possibility of pathogenic co-infections in patients with HPIV-associated pneumonia. Contact precautions and environmental cleaning are crucial to prevent HPIV transmission in hospital settings.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/virología , República de Corea/epidemiología , Anciano , Adulto , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/mortalidad , Coinfección/epidemiología , Infecciones por Paramyxoviridae/epidemiología , Infecciones por Paramyxoviridae/mortalidad , Historia del Siglo XXI , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Adulto Joven , Anciano de 80 o más Años
3.
Curr Opin Crit Care ; 30(5): 463-469, 2024 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39150059

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review explores the similarities and differences between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related and non-COVID-related nosocomial pneumonia, particularly hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). It critically assesses the etiology, prevalence, and mortality among hospitalized patients, emphasizing the burden of these infections during the period before and after the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies highlight an increase in nosocomial infections during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a significant rise in cases involving severe bacterial and fungal superinfections among mechanically ventilated patients. These infections include a higher incidence of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs), complicating treatment and recovery. Notably, COVID-19 patients have shown a higher prevalence of VAP than those with influenza or other respiratory viruses, influenced by extended mechanical ventilation and immunosuppressive treatments like corticosteroids. SUMMARY: The findings suggest that COVID-19 has exacerbated the frequency and severity of nosocomial infections, particularly VAP. These complications not only extend hospital stays and increase healthcare costs but also lead to higher morbidity and mortality rates. Understanding these patterns is crucial for developing targeted preventive and therapeutic strategies to manage and mitigate nosocomial infections during regular or pandemic care.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/epidemiología , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/epidemiología , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Respiración Artificial , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/mortalidad
4.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 143(8): 4933-4941, 2023 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36646943

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Nosocomial pneumonia has poor prognosis in hospitalized trauma patients. Croce et al. published a model to predict post-traumatic ventilator-associated pneumonia, which achieved high discrimination and reasonable sensitivity. We aimed to externally validate Croce's model to predict nosocomial pneumonia in patients admitted to a Dutch level-1 trauma center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included all trauma patients (≥ 16y) admitted for > 24 h to our level-1 trauma center in 2017. Exclusion criteria were pneumonia or antibiotic treatment upon hospital admission, treatment elsewhere > 24 h, or death < 48 h. Croce's model used eight clinical variables-on trauma severity and treatment, available in the emergency department-to predict nosocomial pneumonia risk. The model's predictive performance was assessed through discrimination and calibration before and after re-estimating the model's coefficients. In sensitivity analysis, the model was updated using Ridge regression. RESULTS: 809 Patients were included (median age 51y, 67% male, 97% blunt trauma), of whom 86 (11%) developed nosocomial pneumonia. Pneumonia patients were older, more severely injured, and underwent more emergent interventions. Croce's model showed good discrimination (AUC 0.83, 95% CI 0.79-0.87), yet predicted probabilities were too low (mean predicted risk 6.4%), and calibration was suboptimal (calibration slope 0.63). After full model recalibration, discrimination (AUC 0.84, 95% CI 0.80-0.88) and calibration improved. Adding age to the model increased the AUC to 0.87 (95% CI 0.84-0.91). Prediction parameters were similar after the models were updated using Ridge regression. CONCLUSION: The externally validated and intercept-recalibrated models show good discrimination and have the potential to predict nosocomial pneumonia. At this time, clinicians could apply these models to identify high-risk patients, increase patient monitoring, and initiate preventative measures. Recalibration of Croce's model improved the predictive performance (discrimination and calibration). The recalibrated model provides a further basis for nosocomial pneumonia prediction in level-1 trauma patients. Several models are accessible via an online tool. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Prognostic/Epidemiological Study.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica , Neumonía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infección Hospitalaria/diagnóstico , Infección Hospitalaria/etiología , Pronóstico , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/diagnóstico , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/epidemiología , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/etiología , Neumonía/epidemiología , Neumonía/etiología
5.
Crit Care Med ; 50(3): 460-468, 2022 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34534129

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Multiple randomized controlled trials exploring the outcomes of patients with ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia and hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia have noted that hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia patients who require subsequent ventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia suffered higher mortality than either those who did not (nonventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia) or had ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia. We examined the epidemiology and outcomes of all three conditions in a large U.S. database. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Two hundred fifty-three acute-care hospitals, United States, contributing data (including microbiology) to Premier database, 2012-2019. PATIENTS: Patients with hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia or ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia identified based on a slightly modified previously published International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition/International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition-Clinical Modification algorithm. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 17,819 patients who met enrollment criteria, 26.5% had nonventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia, 25.6% vHAPB, and 47.9% ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia. Ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia predominated in the Northeastern United States and in large urban teaching hospitals. Patients with nonventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia were oldest (mean 66.7 ± 15.1 yr) and most likely White (76.9%), whereas those with ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia were youngest (59.7 ± 16.6 yr) and least likely White (70.3%). Ventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia was associated with the highest comorbidity burden (mean Charlson score 4.1 ± 2.8) and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia with the lowest (3.2 ± 2.5). Similarly, hospital mortality was highest among patients with ventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (29.2%) and lowest in nonventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (11.7%), with ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia in-between (21.3%). Among survivors, 24.5% of nonventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia required a rehospitalization within 30 days of discharge, compared with 22.5% among ventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia and 18.8% ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia. Unadjusted hospital length of stay after infection onset was longest among ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia and shortest among nonventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia patients. Median total hospital costs mirrored length of stay: ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia $77,657, ventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia $62,464, and nonventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia $39,911. CONCLUSIONS: Both hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia remain associated with significant mortality and cost in the United States. Our analyses confirm that of all three conditions, ventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia carries the highest risk of death. In contrast, ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia remains most costly. Nonventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia survivors were most likely to require a readmission within 30 days of discharge.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/epidemiología , Neumonía Bacteriana/epidemiología , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/epidemiología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto , Costo de Enfermedad , Infección Hospitalaria/economía , Femenino , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/economía , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Neumonía Bacteriana/economía , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
6.
J Infect Chemother ; 28(8): 1125-1130, 2022 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35414437

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Nursing and healthcare-associated pneumonia (NHCAP) was proposed by the Japanese Respiratory Society in 2011. However, the clinical characteristics of NHCAP are still unclear. Thus, this study aimed to clarify its clinical characteristics. METHODS: This multicenter prospective observational study included 596 patients with NHCAP from 73 centers in Japan between May 2014 and February 2016. RESULTS: Patient background was characterized by an older age (81.5 ± 10.1 years), most patients had complications (94.1%), and many patients had a high probability of aspiration pneumonia (68.6%). Among the isolates, Streptococcus pneumoniae was the most common (12.7%), while Pseudomonas aeruginosa was also isolated at 10.8%. The overall 30-day mortality rate for patients was 11.9%, and the factors affecting mortality were non-ambulatory status, high blood urea nitrogen level, impaired consciousness, and low albumin level. Sulbactam/ampicillin was the most commonly administered antibiotic, including in groups with high severity of illness and high risk of multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens. Both the A-DROP and I-ROAD scores were useful in predicting the prognosis of NHCAP. Confirmation of intention to provide do not attempt resuscitation (DNAR) instructions was given to 333 patients (55.9%), and 313 patients agreed to DNAR instructions. CONCLUSIONS: NHCAP tends to occur in elderly patients with underlying diseases. The risk of MDR pathogens and the mortality rate are intermediate for community-acquired pneumonia and hospital-acquired pneumonia. As NHCAP is considered an important concept in an aging society, such as in Japan, establishing a treatment strategy that considers not only prognosis but also quality of life would be beneficial.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas , Infección Hospitalaria , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica , Neumonía , Anciano , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/epidemiología , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Neumonía/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida
7.
BMC Pulm Med ; 22(1): 21, 2022 Jan 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35016645

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Social and hospital environmental factors that may be associated with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) have not been evaluated. Comprehensive risk assessment for the incidence of HAP including sociodemographic, clinical, and hospital environmental factors was conducted using national health insurance claims data. METHODS: This is a population-based retrospective cohort study of adult patients who were hospitalized for more than 3 days from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service-National Inpatient Sample data between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2018 in South Korea. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the factors associated with the incidence of HAP. RESULTS: Among the 512,278 hospitalizations, we identified 25,369 (5.0%) HAP cases. In multivariable analysis, well-known risk factors associated with HAP such as older age (over 70 vs. 20-29; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.66; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.36-3.99), male sex (aOR, 1.35; 95% CI 1.32-1.39), pre-existing lung diseases (asthma [aOR, 1.73; 95% CI 1.66-1.80]; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [aOR, 1.62; 95% CI 1.53-1.71]; chronic lower airway disease [aOR, 1.79; 95% CI 1.73-1.85]), tube feeding (aOR, 3.32; 95% CI 3.16-3.50), suctioning (aOR, 2.34; 95% CI 2.23-2.47), positioning (aOR, 1.63; 95% CI 1.55-1.72), use of mechanical ventilation (aOR, 2.31; 95% CI 2.15-2.47), and intensive care unit admission (aOR, 1.29; 95% CI 1.22-1.36) were associated with the incidence of HAP. In addition, poverty (aOR, 1.08; 95% CI 1.04-1.13), general hospitals (aOR, 1.54; 95% CI 1.39-1.70), higher bed-to-nurse ratio (Grade ≥ 5; aOR, 1.45; 95% CI 1.32-1.59), higher number of beds per hospital room (6 beds; aOR, 3.08; 95% CI 2.77-3.42), and ward with caregiver (aOR, 1.19; 95% CI 1.12-1.26) were related to the incidence of HAP. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of HAP was associated with various sociodemographic, clinical, and hospital environmental factors. Thus, taking a comprehensive approach to prevent and treat HAP is important.


Asunto(s)
Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Comorbilidad , Demografía , Ambiente , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , República de Corea/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sociales , Adulto Joven
8.
Biostatistics ; 21(3): 449-466, 2020 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30418529

RESUMEN

A popular modeling approach for competing risks analysis in longitudinal studies is the proportional subdistribution hazards model by Fine and Gray (1999. A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. Journal of the American Statistical Association94, 496-509). This model is widely used for the analysis of continuous event times in clinical and epidemiological studies. However, it does not apply when event times are measured on a discrete time scale, which is a likely scenario when events occur between pairs of consecutive points in time (e.g., between two follow-up visits of an epidemiological study) and when the exact lengths of the continuous time spans are not known. To adapt the Fine and Gray approach to this situation, we propose a technique for modeling subdistribution hazards in discrete time. Our method, which results in consistent and asymptotically normal estimators of the model parameters, is based on a weighted ML estimation scheme for binary regression. We illustrate the modeling approach by an analysis of nosocomial pneumonia in patients treated in hospitals.


Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica/métodos , Bioestadística/métodos , Modelos Estadísticos , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/epidemiología , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales
9.
J Med Virol ; 93(7): 4564-4569, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33822390

RESUMEN

Adverse outcomes in coronavirus infection disease-19 (COVID-19) patients are not always due to the direct effects of the viral infection, but often due to bacterial coinfection. However, the risk factors for such bacterial coinfection are hitherto unknown. A case-control study was conducted to determine risk factors for bacterial infection in moderate to critical COVID-19. Out of a total of 50 cases and 50 controls, the proportion of cases with severe/critical disease at presentation was 80% in cases compared to 30% in controls (p < 0.001). The predominant site was hospital-acquired pneumonia (72%) and the majority were Gram-negative organisms (82%). The overall mortality was 30%, with comparatively higher mortality among cases (42% vs. 18%; p = 0.009). There was no difference between procalcitonin levels in both groups (p = 0.883). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, significant independent association was found with severe/critical COVID-19 at presentation (AOR: 4.42 times; 95% CI: 1.63-11.9) and use of steroids (AOR: 4.60; 95% CI: 1.24-17.05). Notably, 64% of controls were administered antibiotics despite the absence of bacterial coinfection or secondary infection. Risk factors for bacterial infections in moderate to critically ill patients with COVID-19 include critical illness at presentation and use of steroids. There is widespread empiric antibiotic utilization in those without bacterial infection.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas/epidemiología , COVID-19/patología , Coinfección/epidemiología , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/epidemiología , Anciano , Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos , Infecciones Bacterianas/complicaciones , COVID-19/etiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Coinfección/microbiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pakistán/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2
10.
Eur J Clin Invest ; 51(2): e13458, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33219551

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent trials with dexamethasone and hydrocortisone have demonstrated benefit in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Data on methylprednisolone are limited. METHODS: Retrospective cohort of consecutive adults with severe COVID-19 pneumonia on high-flow oxygen (FiO2  ≥ 50%) admitted to an academic centre in New York, from 1 March to 15 April 2020. We used inverse probability of treatment weights to estimate the effect of methylprednisolone on clinical outcomes and intensive care resource utilization. RESULTS: Of 447 patients, 153 (34.2%) received methylprednisolone and 294 (65.8%) received no corticosteroids. At 28 days, 102 patients (22.8%) had died and 115 (25.7%) received mechanical ventilation. In weighted analyses, risk for death or mechanical ventilation was 37% lower with methylprednisolone (hazard ratio 0.63; 95% CI 0.47-0.86; P = .003), driven by less frequent mechanical ventilation (subhazard ratio 0.56; 95% CI 0.40-0.79; P = .001); mortality did not differ between groups. The methylprednisolone group had 2.8 more ventilator-free days (95% CI 0.5-5.1; P = .017) and 2.6 more intensive care-free days (95% CI 0.2-4.9; P = .033) during the first 28 days. Complication rates were not higher with methylprednisolone. CONCLUSIONS: In nonintubated patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia, methylprednisolone was associated with reduced need for mechanical ventilation and less-intensive care resource utilization without excess complications.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/terapia , Presión de las Vías Aéreas Positiva Contínua , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Metilprednisolona/administración & dosificación , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno , Respiración Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/fisiopatología , Femenino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/epidemiología , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/epidemiología , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/epidemiología , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19
11.
BMC Infect Dis ; 21(1): 313, 2021 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33794788

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Currently, the association of nutritional risk screening score with the development of nonventilator hospital-acquired pneumonia (NV-HAP) is unknown. This study investigated whether nutritional risk screening score is an independent predictor of NV-HAP. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted between September 2017 and June 2020 in a tertiary hospital in China. The tool of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) was used for nutritional risk screening. A total score of ≥3 indicated a patient was "at nutritional risk." Logistic regression was applied to explore the association between the NRS score and NV-HAP. RESULTS: A total of 67,280 unique patients were included in the study. The incidence of NV-HAP in the cohort for the NRS < 3 and ≥ 3 NRS group was 0.4% (232/62702) and 2.6% (121/4578), respectively. In a multivariable logistic regression model adjusted for all of the covariates, per 1-point increase in the NRS score was associated with a 30% higher risk of NV-HAP (OR = 1.30; 95%CI:1.19-1.43). Similarly, patients with NRS score ≥ 3 had a higher risk of NV-HAP with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.06 (confidence interval (CI): 1.58-2.70) than those with NRS score < 3. Subgroup analyses indicated that the association between the NRS score and the risk of NV-HAP was similar for most strata. Furthermore, the interaction analyses revealed no interactive role in the association between NRS score and NV-HAP. CONCLUSION: NRS score is an independent predictor of NV-HAP, irrespective of the patient's characteristics. NRS-2002 has the potential as a convenient tool for risk stratification of adult hospitalized patients with different NV-HAP risks.


Asunto(s)
Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/diagnóstico , Desnutrición/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , China/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/complicaciones , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Desnutrición/complicaciones , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Centros de Atención Terciaria
12.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 77(7): 989-998, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33447912

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommended telavancin dosing is based on total body weight (TBW) but lacks adjusted regimens for obese subjects with varying renal function. Our aim was to develop a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of telavancin to design optimized dosing regimens for obese patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and varying renal function. METHODS: The PBPK model was verified using clinical pharmacokinetic (PK) data of telavancin in healthy populations with varying renal function and obese populations with normal renal function. Then, the PBPK model was applied to predict the PK in obese HAP patients with renal impairment (RI). RESULTS: The fold error values of PK parameters (AUC, Cmax, Tmax) were all within 1.5. The telavancin AUC0-inf was predicted to increase 1.07-fold in mild RI, 1.23-fold in moderate RI, 1.41-fold in severe RI, and 1.57-fold in end-stage renal disease (ESRD), compared with that in obese HAP with normal renal function. The PBPK model combined with Monte Carlo simulations (MCS) suggested that dose adjustment based on a 750-mg-fixed dose could achieve effectiveness with reduced risk of toxicity, compared with current TBW-based dosing recommendations. CONCLUSION: The PBPK simulation proposed that using TBW-based regimen in obesity with RI should be avoided. Dose recommendations in obesity from the PBPK model are 750 mg daily for normal renal function and mild RI, 610 mg daily for moderate RI, 530 mg daily for severe RI, and 480 mg daily for ESRD.


Asunto(s)
Aminoglicósidos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/epidemiología , Lipoglucopéptidos/administración & dosificación , Obesidad/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Renal/epidemiología , Adulto , Aminoglicósidos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Área Bajo la Curva , Peso Corporal , Simulación por Computador , Humanos , Lipoglucopéptidos/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Modelos Biológicos , Método de Montecarlo
13.
BMC Pulm Med ; 21(1): 408, 2021 Dec 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34886838

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) is the second most common nosocomial infection in intensive care units (ICUs). The present study aims to determine the prevalence of pathogenic bacteria, their biofilm formation, and molecular typing from patients with HAP in southwestern Iran. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients with HAP participated in this cross-sectional study. Sputum and endotracheal aspirate were collected from each patient for isolation and detection of bacteria. Biofilm formation was evaluated using Congo red agar or Microtiter plate assay. The antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of the isolates were investigated. The multiplex polymerase chain reaction (M-PCR) technique was used to determine the Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome mec (SCCmec) types of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains. All S. aureus isolates were typed using the agr typing method. A repetitive element sequence-based PCR (rep-PCR) typing method was used for typing of Gram-negative bacteria. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 15 and the chi-square test. RESULTS: Bacteria were isolated in 52 (89.7%) of patients. Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii) was the most prevalent organism (37%), followed by S. aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa), and Escherichia coli (E. coli). Using the PCR method, 56 bacteria were detected. A. baumannii was the most prevalent (35.7%) organism. A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa were biofilm-producing. All Gram-negative isolates were colistin-sensitive, and most of the A. baumannii isolates were multidrug-resistant (MDR). MRSA was identified in 12 (80%) S. aureus isolates, and 91.6% of MRSA were SCCmec type III. The agr type III was the most predominant. The rep-PCR analysis showed seven different patterns in 20 A. baumannii, six patterns in 13 P. aeruginosa, and four patterns in 6 E. coli. CONCLUSION: A. baumannii was more prevalent than S. aureus in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), while S. aureus is a major pathogen in non-ventilator hospital-acquired pneumonia (NV-HAP), possibly due to the tendency of the former to aquatic environments. Based on the rep-PCR typing method, it was concluded that bacteria were transmitted from patients or healthcare workers among different wards. Colistin can be used as a treatment in Gram-negative MDR isolates.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/epidemiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/epidemiología , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/epidemiología , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/microbiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biopelículas , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Bacterias Gramnegativas/genética , Bacterias Gramnegativas/aislamiento & purificación , Bacterias Grampositivas/genética , Bacterias Grampositivas/aislamiento & purificación , Humanos , Irán/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Adulto Joven
14.
Clin Infect Dis ; 71(10): e710-e713, 2020 12 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32266388

RESUMEN

Among 200 patients developing hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) outside the intensive care unit, 61% were treated empirically without broad-spectrum Gram-negative coverage, with clinical cure in 69.7%. Lower disease severity markers (systemic inflammatory response syndrome, hypoxia, tachypnoea, neutrophilia) and the absence of diabetes mellitus and prior doxycycline treatment (but not the time to HAP onset) identified patients not requiring broad-spectrum Gram-negative coverage.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos , Infección Hospitalaria , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica , Neumonía , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/epidemiología , Hospitales , Humanos , Neumonía/tratamiento farmacológico
15.
Stroke ; 51(12): 3523-3530, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33161846

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate and independently validate SAA (serum amyloid A)-a recently discovered blood biomarker-to predict poststroke infections. METHODS: The derivation cohort (A) was composed of 283 acute ischemic stroke patients and the independent validation cohort (B), of 367 patients. The primary outcome measure was any stroke-associated infection, defined by the criteria of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, occurring during hospitalization. To determine the association of SAA levels on admission with the development of infections, logistic regression models were calculated. The discriminatory ability of SAA was assessed, by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: After adjusting for all predictors that were significantly associated with any infection in the univariate analysis, SAA remained an independent predictor in study A (adjusted odds ratio, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.16-1.79]; P=0.001) and in study B (adjusted odds ratio, 1.52 [1.05-2.22]; P=0.028). Adding SAA to the best regression model without the biomarker, the discriminatory accuracy improved from 0.76 (0.69-0.83) to 0.79 (0.72-0.86; P<0.001; likelihood ratio test) in study A. These results were externally validated in study B with an improvement in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, from 0.75 (0.70-0.81) to 0.76 (0.71-0.82; P<0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with ischemic stroke, blood SAA measured on admission is a novel independent predictor of infection after stroke. SAA improved the discrimination between patients who developed an infection compared with those who did not in both derivation and validation cohorts. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00390962.


Asunto(s)
Reglas de Decisión Clínica , Infección Hospitalaria/metabolismo , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/metabolismo , Proteína Amiloide A Sérica/metabolismo , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Área Bajo la Curva , Biomarcadores , Proteína C-Reactiva/metabolismo , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Trastornos de Deglución/fisiopatología , Femenino , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/epidemiología , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/metabolismo , Humanos , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/fisiopatología , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/terapia , Recuento de Leucocitos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polipéptido alfa Relacionado con Calcitonina/metabolismo , Curva ROC , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sepsis/metabolismo , Sepsis/fisiopatología , Sepsis/terapia , Infecciones Urinarias/metabolismo , Infecciones Urinarias/fisiopatología , Infecciones Urinarias/terapia
16.
J Surg Res ; 249: 138-144, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31954974

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Trauma is the leading cause of death in pediatric patients over 1 y of age. Controversy exists regarding prehospital airway management for these patients, with some studies suggesting that endotracheal intubation in the field or at a referring hospital is associated with increased mortality and complication rate. These studies were largely performed at urban centers, and it is unclear whether the results apply to suburban/rural networks with longer transport times and more stops at referring hospitals. The purpose of this study is to evaluate differential outcomes in pediatric trauma patients who underwent endotracheal intubation at the scene of injury, referring hospital, or pediatric trauma center in a predominantly rural/suburban setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed evaluating trauma patients age 18 y or younger at a single institution over 10 y (2004-2014). Patients were selected who underwent endotracheal intubation and were classified based on location of intubation (scene, referring hospital, or trauma center). Fischer's exact test and t-tests were performed for comparison. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: 288 patients were identified. 155 (53.8%) were intubated at the scene of injury, 55 (19.1%) at a referring hospital, and 72 (25%) at the trauma center. Overall mortality was 21.9%, which was highest in the scene intubation group (29.7%) compared with the referring hospital (20%) and trauma center (5.6%) groups (P < 0.01). Patients intubated at the scene had higher Injury Severity Scores and lower Glasgow Coma Scale scores (P < 0.01). Duration of intubation was lowest in the trauma center group (P < 0.01). Complication rate was highest in the referring hospital group (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that age, injury severity, and neurologic status were the key drivers of mortality rather than location of intubation. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality and duration of intubation were lowest in trauma patients intubated at a pediatric trauma center. However, location of intubation was not a significant independent predictor of mortality or complications on multivariate analysis, suggesting that age, injury severity, and neurologic status are the main indicators of prognosis in severe pediatric trauma.


Asunto(s)
Intubación Intratraqueal/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Suburbana/estadística & datos numéricos , Transporte de Pacientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/epidemiología , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/etiología , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Intubación Intratraqueal/efectos adversos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Estenosis Traqueal/epidemiología , Estenosis Traqueal/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Heridas y Lesiones/diagnóstico , Heridas y Lesiones/mortalidad
17.
BMC Infect Dis ; 20(1): 668, 2020 Sep 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32919458

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The study was to evaluate initial antimicrobial regimen and clinical outcomes and to explore risk factors for clinical failure (CF) in elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). METHODS: 3011 hospitalized elderly patients were enrolled from 13 national teaching hospitals between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2014 initiated by the CAP-China network. Risk factors for CF were screened by multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The incidence of CF in elderly CAP patients was 13.1%. CF patients were older, longer hospital stays and higher treatment costs than clinical success (CS) patients. The CF patients were more prone to present hyperglycemia, hyponatremia, hypoproteinemia, pleural effusion, respiratory failure and cardiovascular events. Inappropriate initial antimicrobial regimens in CF group were significantly higher than CS group. Undertreatment, CURB-65, PH < 7.3, PaO2/FiO2 < 200 mmHg, sodium < 130 mmol/L, healthcare-associated pneumonia, white blood cells > 10,000/mm3, pleural effusion and congestive heart failure were independent risk factors for CF in multivariable logistic regression analysis. Male and bronchiectasis were protective factors. CONCLUSIONS: Discordant therapy was a cause of CF. Early accurate detection and management of prevention to potential causes is likely to improve clinical outcomes in elderly patients CAP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: A Retrospective Study on Hospitalized Patients With Community-acquired Pneumonia in China (CAP-China) (RSCAP-China), NCT02489578. Registered 16 March 2015, https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/prs/app/action/SelectProtocol?sid=S0005E5S&selectaction=Edit&uid=U0000GWC&ts=2&cx=1bnotb.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/diagnóstico , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología , Femenino , Hospitales de Enseñanza/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Mortalidad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento
18.
Crit Care ; 24(1): 383, 2020 06 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32600375

RESUMEN

In accordance with the recommendations of, amongst others, the Surviving Sepsis Campaign and the recently published European treatment guidelines for hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), in the event of a patient with such infections, empirical antibiotic treatment must be appropriate and administered as early as possible. The aim of this manuscript is to update treatment protocols by reviewing recently published studies on the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia in the critically ill patients that require invasive respiratory support and patients with HAP from hospital wards that require invasive mechanical ventilation. An interdisciplinary group of experts, comprising specialists in anaesthesia and resuscitation and in intensive care medicine, updated the epidemiology and antimicrobial resistance and established clinical management priorities based on patients' risk factors. Implementation of rapid diagnostic microbiological techniques available and the new antibiotics recently added to the therapeutic arsenal has been reviewed and updated. After analysis of the categories outlined, some recommendations were suggested, and an algorithm to update empirical and targeted treatment in critically ill patients has also been designed. These aspects are key to improve VAP outcomes because of the severity of patients and possible acquisition of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs).


Asunto(s)
Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/terapia , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/tendencias , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Crítica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Guías como Asunto , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/epidemiología , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/fisiopatología , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/epidemiología , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/fisiopatología , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/terapia , Factores de Riesgo
19.
Can J Neurol Sci ; 47(2): 197-201, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31659951

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability. Risk factors for in-hospital mortality include older age, co-morbidity, and TBI severity. Few studies have investigated the role of sepsis in individuals with TBI. METHODS: We studied adult patients with TBI admitted to intensive care over a 5-year period. Patient characteristics were identified by linking clinical and administrative databases. Charts of individuals with TBI and sepsis were manually reviewed. Predictors of ICU and hospital mortality were identified using logistic regression modeling. RESULTS: Four hundred eighty-six individuals with TBI were admitted to intensive care. Sixteen (3.3%) developed sepsis. Pneumonia was the most common source (94%). Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen (75%). ICU lengths of stay (LOS) (12.2 days [interquartile range (IQR) 4.4-23.5] versus 3.7 days [IQR 1.7-8.2]; p < 0.001) and hospital LOS (28.0 days [IQR 11.8-41.4] versus 15.3 days [IQR 5.0-30.9]; p = 0.017) were longer in patients with TBI and sepsis. Sepsis was not associated with ICU (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.51; 95%CI 0.12-2.27; p = 0.38) or hospital (aOR 0.78; 95% CI 0.21-2.96; p = 0.78) mortality, though age (aOR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00-1.04; p = 0.014 for hospital mortality), severe TBI (aOR 3.71; 95% CI 1.52-9.08; p = 0.004 for ICU mortality and 4.10; 95% CI 1.95-8.65; p < 0.001 for hospital mortality), and APACHE II score (aOR 1.19; 95% CI 1.11-1.28; p < 0.001 for ICU mortality and 1.22; 95% CI 1.14-1.31; p < 0.001 for hospital mortality) were. CONCLUSION: Sepsis in patients with TBI was not associated with mortality; however, sepsis was associated with increased health care utilization (ICU and hospital LOS).


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/epidemiología , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/epidemiología , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Sepsis/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Adulto , Femenino , Infecciones por Haemophilus/epidemiología , Humanos , Enfermedad Iatrogénica/epidemiología , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Staphylococcus aureus , Infecciones Urinarias/epidemiología
20.
Neurocrit Care ; 32(3): 836-846, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31562598

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Health care-associated infections (HAIs) in intensive care units (ICUs) specialized for neurocritical care (neurocritical care units [NCCUs]) are serious yet preventable complications that contribute significantly to morbidity and mortality worldwide. However, reliable data are scarcely available from the developing world. We aimed to analyze the incidence, epidemiology, microbial etiology, and outcomes of HAIs in an NCCU of a tertiary care teaching hospital in a high-income, developing country. METHODS: In this 3-year retrospective cohort study, all patients admitted to the NCCU at the Ibn Sina Hospital in Kuwait for ≥ 2 calendar days were included. Patient demographics, hospitalization, and details of ICU-acquired infections were evaluated. Patient-related outcomes included hospital and ICU length of stay (LOS) and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Among 913 patients with a total of 4921 ICU days, 79 patients had 109 episodes of HAIs. The overall incidence rate and incidence density of HAIs were 11.9/100 patients and 22.1/1000 ICU days, respectively. Multiple episodes of infection were documented in 29% of patients. The most prevalent infections were urinary tract infections (UTIs; 40/109 [37%]), bloodstream infections (30/109 [28%]), and pneumonia (16/109 [15%]). Seventy-six percent of infections were device-associated infections. A total of 158 pathogens were isolated, of which 109 were Gram-negative bacteria. Of the 40 Gram-positive bacteria, 22 were staphylococci. Seven infections were due to Clostridium difficile. There were 15 Staphylococcus aureus isolates, 47% of which were methicillin resistant. Two episodes of UTIs were due to Candida species. There were 84 Enterobacteriaceae isolates, 24% of which were extended-spectrum ß-lactamase producers. All Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were susceptible to aminoglycosides and carbapenems. Klebsiella species were the most common pathogen (45/158 [28%]), causing pneumonia (11/33 isolates [33%]), bloodstream infections (12/37 isolates [32%]), and UTIs (16/52 isolates [31%]). One episode of bloodstream infection was due to multidrug resistant Acinetobacter baumanii which was susceptible only to colistin. Only pneumonia was independently associated with mortality, while all HAIs that occurred were significantly associated with a prolonged ICU LOS. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first HAI surveillance study in an NCCU in Kuwait, and our results demonstrate the burden of HAIs on the neurologically injured patient, regardless of the site of infection. The high prevalence and resistant profile of HAIs in an NCCU in a developing country relative to a developed country has important implications for patient safety and emphasizes the need to strengthen collaboration between NCCU teams and infection control teams to prevent serious complications in this setting.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso , Infecciones Urinarias/epidemiología , Adulto , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Países en Desarrollo , Femenino , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/epidemiología , Unidades Hospitalarias , Hospitales de Enseñanza , Humanos , Incidencia , Kuwait/epidemiología , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/epidemiología , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Catéteres Urinarios , Ventriculostomía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA