Innovative Hip Distraction Approaches for Total Hip Arthroplasty in Crowe IV Developmental Dysplasia or Similar High-Riding Patients.

BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) for dislocated hips (Crowe IV dysplasia) presents unique challenges. Conventional approaches involve subtrochanteric osteotomies, but are complex with additional fixation and potentially lead to limb length discrepancies, nerve palsies, and other complications. An alternative strategy is a staged approach, where the femoral head (or remnant) is gradually lowered (distraction technique) to align with the true acetabulum over a period of time, followed by a second-stage anatomically acetabular-positioned THA. External fixation distraction and telescoping internal lengthening devices have been utilized to achieve preoperative alignment. We evaluated these techniques, including the types, time, and amount of distraction needed, as well as outcomes and complication rates. METHODS: In this retrospective case series, 14 patients (9 women, 5 men), who had a mean age of 32 years (range, 16 to 67), underwent staged surgical interventions using hip distraction using external fixators or internal lengthening devices for hip dysplasia and other pathologies (Perthes disease, osteonecrosis) in preparation for a second-stage anatomically placed THA. The mean follow-up duration for external-fixation patients was 10 years (range, 6.5 to 13.4). RESULTS: Staged treatment involved external fixators (n = 8) or internal lengthening devices (n = 6) with a device placement mean of 48 days (range, 42 to 71). The amount of distraction ranged from 6 to 12 cm. There were 2 patients who required uncomplicated revision of the internal lengthening devices, and another patient had a temporary peroneal nerve palsy. There was 1 patient who underwent an acetabular revision at 7 years. CONCLUSIONS: We focused on a challenging patient cohort that emphasizes the efficacy of staged interventions in managing Crowe Type IV dysplasia and similar cases. Favorable outcomes were found with the immediate transition to THA after device removal that effectively addressed soft-tissue contractures and femoral migration. Despite the need for further validation via larger, prospective studies, this innovative approach may pave the way toward optimizing this strategy for these difficult hip pathologies.

Retrograde Extramedullary Lengthening of the Femur Using the PRECICE Nail: Technique and Results.

BACKGROUND: Lengthening of long bones by distraction osteogenesis is now possible using intramedullary lengthening nails. Constraints of bone size, medullary canal obstruction, and the presence of an open physis are contraindications in skeletally immature patients. We present a technique describing the "off-label" use of a magnetic lengthening nail placed extramedullary and in retrograde manner, for lengthening of the femur in skeletally immature patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of 5 skeletally immature patients with significant length discrepancy of the femur are presented along with a description of the surgical technique. Data collected included age, sex, date of surgery, diagnosis, presence of associated deformities, the magnitude of length discrepancy, the amount of length gained, the amount of time to achieve full weight-bearing, the time to hardware removal, and any complications. RESULTS: There were 5 patients (3 females). The mean age was 7.2±2.7 years (4 to 10 y). The mean limb length discrepancy was 6.5±3.7 cm (3.5 to 11 cm). A mean length of 3.46±0.4 cm (3.1 to 4 cm) was achieved which represents 12.9±1.8% (10.32 to 13.47%) of the bone length. The time taken to achieve full weight-bearing ambulation was 89.2±19.3 days (60 to 109 d) or 12.7 weeks. All hardware was removed 247.6±215.6 days (99 to 628 d) after surgery. Patients were followed up for a mean duration of 19.2 months (11 to 30 mo). No supplemental fixation was required and no complications were noted. Acute deformity correction was also performed at the time of surgery in 2 patients who had distal femur valgus deformity. CONCLUSIONS: Retrograde extramedullary lengthening of the femur is an option that should be considered for limb length equalization in skeletally immature patients. It avoids the inconvenience of external fixation and can be used to simultaneously correct deformities of the distal femur. Although the total amount of length gained is modest, we believe it is a promising limb lengthening technique that merits further investigation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

The Effect of Proximal Anchor Choice During Distraction-based Surgeries for Patients With Nonidiopathic Early-onset Scoliosis: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether the type of proximal anchor affects the spine length achieved with distraction-based surgeries in patients with nonidiopathic early-onset scoliosis (EOS). Since distraction may produce kyphosis, spine length should be assessed in the sagittal plane using the sagittal spine length (SSL-curved arc length of the spine in the sagittal plane). Our purpose was to determine if the type of proximal anchor in distraction-based surgeries will affect final spine length. METHODS: Patients with nonidiopathic EOS treated with distraction-based systems (minimum 5 y follow-up, 5 lengthenings) were identified from 2 EOS registries. Radiographic analysis preoperative, postimplant (L1), and after each lengthening (L2-L5, L6-L10, L11-L15) was performed with the primary outcome of T1-S1 SSL. RESULTS: We identified 126 patients-70 had rib-based implants (52 congenital, 9 syndromic, 9 neuromuscular) and 56 had spine-based implants (15 congenital, 29 syndromic, 12 neuromuscular) with preoperative age 4.6 years, scoliosis 75 degrees, and kyphosis 48 degrees. After initial correction (P<0.05), scoliosis remained constant [58 degrees (13 to 104 degrees) at L11-L15] and kyphosis increased over time [38 degrees (9 to 108 degrees) at L1 to 60 degrees (17 to 134 degrees) at L11-L15] (P<0.05). Preoperative SSL was higher in the spine-based group (29.6 cm) when compared with the rib-based group (25.2 cm) (P<0.05). This difference was maintained after initial implantation (spine-based: 32.2 cm vs. rib-based: 26.7 cm, P<0.05) and at final follow-up (spine-based: 37.0 cm vs. rib-based: 34.4 cm, P<0.05). As preoperative SSL differed between groups, maximum SSL gains per interval were also normalized to preoperative SSL. There was no statistically significant difference between groups at L1, L2-L5, and L6-L10. However, at L11-L15, the rib-based group achieved a more relative increase in spine length compared with the spine-based group (45% vs. 31%, P<0.05). CONCLUSION: At minimum 5 year follow-up, distraction-based surgeries increased spine length for patients with nonidiopathic EOS; regardless of proximal anchor type.

Rib-based Distraction Device Implantation Before Age 3 Associated With Higher Unplanned Rate of Return to the Operating Room.

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of early-onset scoliosis (EOS) with rib-based implants such as the vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR) is associated with a high rate of complications including surgical site infection, skin breakdown, and implant migration. Many of these complications warrant the need for unplanned reoperations, increasing the burden on an already vulnerable patient population, and introducing the further risk of infection. To provide insight into the risks of early intervention, we investigate the relationship between initial device implantation before the age of 3 and the rate of unplanned reoperation. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all patients at a single institution who had undergone VEPTR insertion for EOS with at least a 2-year follow-up from 2007 to 2016. Patients were stratified into the case-cohort (0 to 2 y of age) or the comparison cohort (3 to 10 y of age) based on age at the time of device implantation. Multivariate regression accounting for age and scoliosis etiology was performed to identify factors predictive of unplanned reoperation. RESULTS: A total of 137 of 185 patients treated with VEPTR were identified with 76 (56%) undergoing at least 1 unplanned reoperation during the study time period. There were 68 and 69 patients in the age 0- to 2-year and 3- to 10-year cohorts, respectively. Patients aged 0 to 2 years underwent a higher number of total procedures compared with those aged 3 to 10 (13.1±6.5 vs. 10.6±4.8, P=0.032). A significant difference was found in the rate of unplanned reoperation between the 2 cohorts with 44 (65%) patients aged 0 to 2 and 32 (46%) patients aged 3 to 10 undergoing at least 1 unplanned reoperation (P=0.031). Binary logistic multivariate regression accounting for age and scoliosis etiology demonstrated that patients aged 0 to 2 had a significantly greater odds of undergoing an unplanned reoperation (odds ratio=3.050; 95% confidence interval: 1.285-7.241; P=0.011) compared with patients aged 3 to 10 years. CONCLUSION: Overall, EOS patients aged 0 to 2 at initial VEPTR implantation are up to 3 times higher risk of undergoing an unplanned reoperation compared with those aged 3 to 10. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Contouring the magnetically controlled growing rods: impact on expansion capacity and proximal junctional kyphosis.

OBJECTIVE: To quantitatively determine the relationship between the contouring of the magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR), their expansion capacity and the risk of developing proximal junctional kyphosis in early onset scoliosis (EOS). MCGRs allow gradual expansion and correction of the spinal deformity in EOS while reducing the need for repeated surgeries. As the expansion of the MCGRs is controlled externally, several factors can impact the discrepancy between the intended and actual expansions of the rods. The expansion capacity of the growing rods as a function of the expanded length has been tested in experimental setups; however, no study has evaluated the role of contouring of the MCGRs on its function and long-term surgical outcome. METHODS: A total of 25 EOS patients, a total of 48 MCGRs, with right thoracic curves, were studied retrospectively. All patients had two view spinal radiographs at pre-operative, after MCGR implantation, and after 6 lengthening visits. The first post-operative radiographs were used to calculate the 3D contour of the MCGR at the proximal end. 2D ultrasound images before and after lengthening visits were used to measure the rod lengthening at each visit. The relationship between the increase in the rod length and rod curvature was determined. Finally, the rod curvature was correlated to the changes in proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) angle between the pre-operative and the most recent follow-up, i.e., after 6 visits. RESULTS: The average rod 3D angle at the proximal end was 13.5° ± 9.7° [0°-37.2°]. The overall increased length after six lengthening visits for the rod at the concave side was 18.8 mm and at the convex side was 16.9 mm. 62% of the patients with a contoured rod at the proximal end developed a PJK exceeding 10° whereas in patients with a straight rod PJK occurred in 9.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Contouring the MCGR impacts both the mechanics of the rod expansion and the prevalence of PJK in EOS patient population.

Review of automatic continuous distraction osteogenesis devices for mandibular reconstruction applications.

Distraction osteogenesis (DO) is an emerging method for bone tissue reconstruction. In oral and maxillofacial reconstruction applications, DO is playing an important role as a technique without the need of bone graft. In addition, in a DO treatment procedure, a superior outcome could be achieved compared to conventional reconstruction techniques. Recently, a few automatic continuous distraction osteogenesis (ACDO) devices have been designed and developed to be used in human reconstruction applications. Experiments and animal studies have validated the functionality of the developed ACDO devices. It has shown that by using such ACDO devices in a DO procedure, compared to conventional manual DO methods, superior outcomes could be obtained. However, the application of such ACDO devices is still limited. More research and investigation need to be undertaken to study all requirements of ACDO devices to be used in successful human mandibular DO treatment. It is important to determine all requirements and standards that need to be considered and applied in the design and development of ACDO devices. The purpose of this review paper is to highlight the designed and developed ACDO procedures thus far in terms of their working principles, working parameters, and technical aspects for providing a better perspective of the development progress of ACDO devices for oral and maxillofacial reconstruction applications. In this paper, design principles, device specifications, and working parameters of ACDO devices are compared and discussed. Subsequently, current limitations and gaps have been addressed, and future works for enabling an ultimate automatic DO procedure have been suggested.

Management of patients with magnetically controlled growth rods amidst the global COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: At the time of writing, we are all coping with the global COVID-19 pandemic. Amongst other things, this has had a significant impact on postponing virtually all routine clinic visits and elective surgeries. Concurrently, the Magnetic Expansion Control (MAGEC) rod has been issued with a number of field safety notices and UK regulator medical device alerts. METHODS: This document serves to provide an overview of the current situation regarding the use of MAGEC rods, primarily in the UK, and the impact that the pandemic has had on the management of patients with these rods. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The care of each patient must of course be determined on an individual basis; however, the experience of the authors is that a short delay in scheduled distractions and clinic visits will not adversely impact patient treatment. The authors caution against a gap in distractions of longer than 6 months and emphasise the importance of continued remote patient monitoring to identify those who may need to be seen more urgently.

Extramedullary Motorized Lengthening of the Femur in Young Children.

BACKGROUND: Limb lengthening by distraction osteogenesis is now achievable via motorized intramedullary devices, mitigating many complications of lengthening by external fixation. In young patients, antegrade intramedullary nailing of the femur risks avascular necrosis of the femoral head. A method of extramedullary placement of a motorized expandable intramedullary nail has been employed by the senior author to safely achieve femoral lengthening without the use of an external fixator in young patients. METHODS: Eleven skeletally immature patients with lower limb length discrepancy were reviewed who underwent extramedullary placement of a magnetic, expandable intramedullary nail for lengthening of the femur. Surgical details, lengthening parameters, and complications were reviewed and classified according to the modified Clavien-Dindo Classification. RESULTS: Average lengthening was 32.3 mm (range: 27 to 40 mm) comprising an average 14.8% of femoral segment length. The average lengthening duration was 6.3 weeks, and average full weight-bearing began at 12.6 weeks. All but 1 patient underwent early removal of the device at an average of 4.5 months, and 5 had immediate plating of the femur. Complications rates were comparable to other methods of femoral lengthening, including varus or procurvatum through the regenerate, and unplanned reoperation in 3 of 11 cases. Preoperative considerations included careful planning of implant length due to short femoral segments and protection of the knee joint from contracture or iatrogenic instability. CONCLUSIONS: Extramedullary placement of a magnetic expandable intramedullary lengthening nail can achieve lengthening of the femur without the use of external fixation. Considerations with this technique include careful planning of implant length relative to trochanteric-physeal distance, protection against knee subluxation during lengthening, and mitigating deformity of the regenerate. Off-label, extramedullary use of these devices can be considered to decrease the burdens of external fixation in young children. The technique begs the advent of future all-internal technology specifically designed for safe limb lengthening in this age group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-retrospective case series.

Continuous distraction osteogenesis device with MAAC controller for mandibular reconstruction applications.

BACKGROUND: Distraction osteogenesis (DO) is a novel technique widely used in human body reconstruction. DO has got a significant role in maxillofacial reconstruction applications (MRA); through this method, bone defects and skeletal deformities in various cranio-maxillofacial areas could be reconstructed with superior results in comparison to conventional methods. Recent studies revealed in a DO solution, using an automatic continuous distractor could significantly improve the results while decreasing the existing issues. This study is aimed at designing and developing a novel automatic continuous distraction osteogenesis (ACDO) device to be used in the MRA. METHODS: The design is comprised of a lead screw translation mechanism and a stepper motor, placed outside of the mouth to generate the desired continuous linear force. This externally generated and controlled distraction force (DF) is transferred into the moving bone segment via a flexible miniature transition system. The system is also equipped with an extra-oral ACDO controller, to generate an accurate, reliable, and stable continuous DF. RESULTS: Simulation and experimental results have justified the controller outputs and the desired accuracy of the device. Experiments have been conducted on a sheep jaw bone and results have showed that the developed device could offer a continuous DF of 38 N with distraction accuracy of 7.6 nm on the bone segment, while reducing the distraction time span. CONCLUSION: Continuous DF with high resolution positioning control, along with the smaller size of the distractor placed in the oral cavity will help in improving the result of the reconstruction operation and leading to a successful DO procedure in a shorter time period. The developed ACDO device has less than 1% positioning error while generating sufficient DF. These features make this device a suitable distractor for an enhanced DO treatment in MRA.

Experience with resorbable sonic pins for the attachment of distraction devices in posterior cranial vault distraction operations.

BACKGROUND: Distraction techniques are effective methods for the treatment of craniosynostoses when a significant gain of an intracranial volume is required. However, this technique raises some challenges at different stages of the treatment. While installing the distractors in patients with thin calvarial bone, there is a risk of dural damage from the titanium screws. The need for wide exposure of the devices and the screws during removal causes soft tissue damage and bleeding. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate sonic pin use in the distraction procedures. METHODS: Resorbable sonic pins were used in 11 consecutive posterior cranial vault distraction procedures to attach distraction devices to the calvarial bone. RESULTS: This method allowed for a less traumatic and faster removal of the devices without the risk of leaving foreign bodies in the wound. In three out of 11 cases on follow-up, displacement of proximal distractor footplate and partial relapse of distraction were detected. Though there was a smaller volume increase in these patients, all of them benefited clinically from the PCVD and did not require reoperations. CONCLUSIONS: This method allows a strong and stable attachment of the distractor devices to the cranial vault bones with a reduced risk of dural tears due to the screws. It also allows for easier and less traumatic device removal.

Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound enhances callus consolidation in distraction osteogenesis of the tibia by the technique of lengthening over the nail procedure.

BACKGROUND: Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) has been widely accepted in promoting the fracture healing process. However, there have been limited clinical trials focused on the efficacy of LIPUS during distraction osteogenesis (DO) by the technique of lengthening over the nail procedure. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the efficacy of LIPUS during DO. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 30 patients (60 segments) who underwent simultaneous bilateral tibial lengthening over the nail. The patients were grouped into the LIPUS group and the control group based on LIPUS stimulation. The two patient groups were compared for demographic data (sex, age at operation, preoperative height, BMI, and smoking history), qualitative assessments of the callus (callus shape and type), external fixation index, and four cortical healing indexes. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (30 segments) were classified as the LIPUS group, and another 15 patients (30 segments) were classified as the control group. No significant differences were found in the assessed demographic data between the groups. LIPUS stimulated a more cylindrical, more homogenous, and denser type of callus formation at the end of the distraction phase. The two groups exhibited equivalent outcomes in terms of external fixation index (p = 0.579). However, significant differences were found in healing indexes of the anterior and medial cortices (p <  0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). The healing indexes of those cortices in the LIPUS group (mean of 36.6 days/cm and 32.5 days/cm, respectively) reflected their significantly faster healing compared to the control group (mean HI of 57.5 days/cm and 44.2 days/cm, respectively). There were no LIPUS-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: LIPUS is a noninvasive and effective adjuvant therapy to enhance callus maturation during DO. It enhances callus consolidation and may have a positive effect on the appropriate callus shape and type.

Cranial Anchored Mandible Distraction Osteogenesis.

Multiple or large distance mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) in the older child is often complicated by iatrogenic temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pathology. The transmission of significant force to the TMJ in these particular patients is due to the greater distance of distraction required and the relative inelasticity of the soft tissue envelope. The authors present a clinical report of a successful asymmetrically vectored large distance MDO in a 13-year-old female with bilateral craniofacial microsomia with Goldenhar syndrome. During distraction, the TMJ joints were effectively unloaded from the forces of distraction using external bilateral cranial anchored devices (Cranio-Mandibular Fixator; KLS Martin, Jacksonville, FL). Angle's occlusion, facial angle, and evidence of TMJ pathology were assessed.

Surgery-First Orthognathic Surgery for Severe Facial Asymmetry Combined With Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis Using a Three-Dimensional Internal Distractor.

Severe facial asymmetry in adults with hemifacial microsomia or other types of mandibular hypoplasia is challenging to treat with simultaneous maxillomandibular distraction osteogenesis using an external distractor combined with intermaxillary fixation (IMF). Using an external distractor also produces significant distress for patients for at least 8 weeks. Furthermore, mandibular-driven distraction tends to elongate the midface, with difficulty positioning of the center of the maxilla in the center of the face and horizontalization of the occlusal plane. To overcome these disadvantages, the authors performed repositioning of the Le Fort I segment intraoperatively to restore maxillary roll levering, followed by mandibular distraction using a 3-dimensional internal distractor with a variable angle for better control and tolerable postoperative distraction osteogenesis. This approach is based on the surgery-first concept. During the operation, the Le Fort I segment was fixed centrally in the center of the face and horizontally in the occlusal plane based on a computer-aided surgical simulation. Before mandibular corticotomy, a 3-dimensional internal distractor was placed on the affected side. Finally, vertical ramus osteotomy of the unaffected side was performed. After completion of distraction with IMF using elastic bands, IMF was released. The distractor was removed after a 6-month postoperative consolidation period. This method has been used in 5 patients with severe facial asymmetry, which were all successfully treated without complication. These cases show that this method can be used for severe facial asymmetry in adults, based on the surgery-first concept of minimizing the duration of orthodontic treatment and optimizing facial aesthetics.

A Novel Technique Using W-Shaped Steel Wire Suspension System to Improve the Stability of Rigid External Distraction Devise in a Child With Apert Syndrome.

Rigid external distraction device (RED) is an efficient and reliable technique for syndromic craniosynostosis patient's postoperative midface distraction. But the instability of the RED is still a major complication. In this case, the authors reported a novel and simple method to solve the RED movement after Le Fort III osteotomy by using W-shaped steel wire suspension system in a child with Apert syndrome whose bilateral temporal bone is extremely thin. The system resisted the rotational force produced by traction force and effectively restricted the RED rotation down, improving the stability of the RED. The authors think this technique has the advantages of being cheap, easy to accomplish and comfortable to wear. Although may cause extra trauma, it is an available technique to improve the postoperative stability of RED especially for patients with thin temporal bones.

Treatment of bone tumor using external fixator.

External fixation has been widely used for the treatment of limb length discrepancy, deformity correction, and bone defect using distraction osteogenesis. We have been using this technique for the treatment of obstacles due to benign bone tumor and reconstruction after malignant bone tumor resection. In this paper, we introduce the usefulness of external fixation for the treatment of various benign bone tumors and limb salvage surgery for reconstruction after tumor resection using distraction osteogenesis, according to the tumor site. The advantages of external fixation for the treatment of benign bone tumor include a possibility of complex deformity correction without treating the tumor itself and reconstruction of the aggressive benign bone tumor as well as solid fixation with wires, even for weak bone due to benign bone tumors. The advantages of treating malignant bone tumor include regeneration of living bone of sufficient strength and durability, biological affinity, resistance against infection, and lifelong restored function. The disadvantages include delayed union at the docking site and pin-or wire-tract infection, patient's psychological stress, and the procedure is time consuming. We conclude that external fixation is very efficient for the treatment of benign and malignant bone tumors.

Can Use of Rigid Fixation After Consolidation Increase Stability in Cleft Patients Following Distraction Osteogenesis?

PURPOSE: The stability of distraction osteogenesis (DO) is an important issue in maxillary advancement for patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP). The aim of this study was to evaluate postoperative stability in patients with and without internal fixation after removing maxillary distraction devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized clinical trial assessed patients with CLP who needed maxillary advancement greater than 6 mm; they were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups. In group 1, distraction devices were removed 3 months after distraction and then 4 L miniplates were placed bilaterally in the maxilla. In group 2 (controls), no miniplates were placed after removing the distraction devices. Lateral cephalograms taken on 3 occasions (preoperatively, immediately after removing the distraction device, and after 18 months) were used to determine vertical and horizontal changes at the A point. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (n = 11 per group) were included. There was no significant difference between groups for horizontal relapse (P = .79). The results showed no significant difference for vertical relapse between the 2 groups (P = .11). The Pearson correlation test showed a correlation between the amount of advancement and horizontal relapse at the A point in group 1 (P = .01) and group 2 (P = .001). In group 1, for every 1-mm maxillary advancement, a 0.36-mm relapse was seen (B = 0.36, P = .01). In group 2, for every 1-mm maxillary advancement, a 0.43-mm relapse was seen (B = 0.43, P = .001). CONCLUSION: According to these results, rigid fixation after consolidation did not increase stability in patients with CLP after DO.

Unusual Craniofacial Distraction.

A retrospective Institutional Review Board-approved review was performed at the Institute of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, of patients undergoing craniofacial distraction osteogenesis procedures using the rigid external distractor device between 2000 and 2010. Three particularly challenging cases were identified and are presented here.

Treatment of Maxillary Hypoplasia in Cleft Lip and Palate: Segmental Distraction Osteogenesis With Hyrax Device.

The objective of this work is to describe a segmental maxillary distraction osteogenesis (SDO) with segmental Lefort I with an inexpensive device.Four patients who presented severe class III and maxillary hypoplasia due to cleft lip and palate sequel were treated. A SDO was performed using a dental-anchored Hyrax device, achieving enlargement of the upper jaw without altering speech, with adequate and stable occlusion. Dental implants in a new formed bone were installed.The authors can conclude that SDO is a good treatment alternative for patients with maxillary hypoplasia. It preserves velopharyngeal function and is a stable treatment, maintaining the overjet achieved with distraction osteogenesis, without changes in posterior occlusion. The open bite generated with tooth-borne devices can be solved with temporary anchorage devices and intermaxillary elastics during consolidation phase. Modified Hyrax device allows expanding and moving forward the maxillary arch, with a low cost.

Rigid External Distractor-Aided Advancement After Simultaneously Performed LeFort-III Osteotomy and Fronto-Orbital Advancement.

Due to the complex development of the craniofacial skull, corrective surgery is a major challenge for patients with severe craniofaciostenosis. Although fronto-orbital advancement and simultaneous LeFort-III osteotomy in combination with distraction osteogenesis have been reported as a safe and successful method to obtain good esthetic and functional results, there is a lack of studies evaluating this method.Our retrospective study included 12 patients with syndromic craniofaciostenosis, who were primarily treated at our department in accordance with a standardized treatment protocol, consisting of a simultaneous fronto-orbital advancement with LeFort-III osteotomy in combination with a rigid external distractor (RED-II). Distraction distance, duration of operation, postoperative complications, perioperative hemoglobin concentration, esthetic outcome, and the subjective Whitaker Scale were used to evaluate the success of our surgical method.The esthetic outcome of all of our patients was assessed as good. Furthermore, the surgical outcome was assigned I for 11 patients and II for 1 patient, who suffered from wound healing disturbance at the left temporal site, which required revision 2 weeks postoperatively. The mean skeletal advancement of the midface was 16.4 mm, ranging from 12 to 20 mm.Our standardized treatment protocol, consisting of fronto-orbital advancement in combination with LeFort-III osteotomy and application of a rigid external distractor device (RED-III) for patients with severe syndromic craniofaciostenosis, goes along with low infection rates and more predictable and precise esthetic and functional outcomes than the conventional surgical technique without distraction osteogenesis.

Anterior Maxillary Segmental Distraction Osteogenesis for Treatment of Maxillary Hypoplasia in Patients With Repaired Cleft Palate.

OBJECTIVE: This study is to present experiences of using anterior maxillary segmental distraction osteogenesis (AMSDO) with internal distractors for treatment of maxillary hypoplasia in patients with repaired cleft palate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 42 patients of maxillary hypoplasia with repaired cleft palate were included in this study, and underwent AMSDO. Cephalometric analysis and speech quality assessments were performed to evaluate the changes after AMSDO and its long-term effect on stability. RESULTS: All cases had successfully accomplished AMSDO. The average SNA (°), NA-FH (°), ANS-PNS (millimeter), and Overjet (millimeter) have change to 80.41°, 89.51°, 55.64 mm, and 2.52 mm, respectively (P < 0.01). Maxillary advancement has reached 13.80 mm on average (ranging from 10.0 mm to 20.0 mm). Speech quality assessment demonstrated that nasal resonance, speech articulation, nasal emission, intelligibility, and velopharyngeal function did not get worse after AMSDO. CONCLUSIONS: AMSDO has unique advantages as follows: can effectively correct maxillary hypoplasia in patients with repaired cleft palate; can create a space for postoperative orthodontic treatment to solve the crowding teeth situation; the postoperative velopharyngeal function and speech quality show no significant change. The results shown AMSDO is an effective and appropriate treanment for curing maxillary hypoplasia in patients with repaired cleft palate.