Long-Term Risk of Cardiovascular Death With Use of Clarithromycin and Roxithromycin: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

Recent studies have raised concern that macrolide antibiotics may be associated with an increased long-term risk of cardiovascular death. We examined the 1-year risk associated with treatment with clarithromycin (n = 187,887) or roxithromycin (n = 698,899) compared with penicillin V (n = 3,473,081), matched 1:4 on propensity score, in a nationwide, registry-based cohort study in Danish outpatients, 1997-2011. Among clarithromycin courses, the rate ratio for cardiovascular death was 1.24 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.96, 1.59). Among roxithromycin courses, the rate ratio was 0.99 (95% CI: 0.86, 1.16). In analyses by time after treatment start, the rate ratio associated with clarithromycin was 1.66 (95% CI: 0.98, 2.79) during days 0-7. This was attenuated in later time periods (days 8-89, rate ratio = 1.30, 95% CI: 0.88, 1.94; and days 90-364, rate ratio = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.63, 1.47). For roxithromycin, the rate ratios were 0.88 (95% CI: 0.59, 1.32) during days 0-7, 1.17 (95% CI: 0.92, 1.48) during days 8-89, and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.70, 1.10) during days 90-364. We found no increased risk of cardiovascular death in a general outpatient population. With clarithromycin, we observed a transient increased risk during days 0-7 after treatment start, which corresponds to the period of active treatment. This association was absent in later time periods, which is consistent with no long-term toxicity resulting in cardiovascular death.

Macrolide antibiotics for bronchiectasis.

BACKGROUND: Bronchiectasis is a chronic respiratory disease characterised by abnormal and irreversible dilatation and distortion of the smaller airways. Bacterial colonisation of the damaged airways leads to chronic cough and sputum production, often with breathlessness and further structural damage to the airways. Long-term macrolide antibiotic therapy may suppress bacterial infection and reduce inflammation, leading to fewer exacerbations, fewer symptoms, improved lung function, and improved quality of life. Further evidence is required on the efficacy of macrolides in terms of specific bacterial eradication and the extent of antibiotic resistance. OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of macrolide antibiotics in the treatment of adults and children with bronchiectasis. SEARCH METHODS: We identified trials from the Cochrane Airways Trials Register, which contains studies identified through multiple electronic searches and handsearches of other sources. We also searched trial registries and reference lists of primary studies. We conducted all searches on 18 January 2018. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of at least four weeks' duration that compared macrolide antibiotics with placebo or no intervention for the long-term management of stable bronchiectasis in adults or children with a diagnosis of bronchiectasis by bronchography, plain film chest radiograph, or high-resolution computed tomography. We excluded studies in which participants had received continuous or high-dose antibiotics immediately before enrolment or before a diagnosis of cystic fibrosis, sarcoidosis, or allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Our primary outcomes were exacerbation, hospitalisation, and serious adverse events. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently screened the titles and abstracts of 103 records. We independently screened the full text of 40 study reports and included 15 trials from 30 reports. Two review authors independently extracted outcome data and assessed risk of bias for each study. We analysed dichotomous data as odds ratios (ORs) and continuous data as mean differences (MDs) or standardised mean differences (SMDs). We used standard methodological procedures as expected by Cochrane. MAIN RESULTS: We included 14 parallel-group RCTs and one cross-over RCT with interventions lasting from 8 weeks to 24 months. Of 11 adult studies with 690 participants, six used azithromycin, four roxithromycin, and one erythromycin. Four studies with 190 children used either azithromycin, clarithromycin, erythromycin, or roxithromycin.We included nine adult studies in our comparison between macrolides and placebo and two in our comparison with no intervention. We included one study with children in our comparison between macrolides and placebo and one in our comparison with no intervention.In adults, macrolides reduced exacerbation frequency to a greater extent than placebo (OR 0.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.22 to 0.54; 341 participants; three studies; I2 = 65%; moderate-quality evidence). This translates to a number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome of 4 (95% CI 3 to 8). Data show no differences in exacerbation frequency between use of macrolides (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.08 to 1.15; 43 participants; one study; moderate-quality evidence) and no intervention. Macrolides were also associated with a significantly better quality of life compared with placebo (MD -8.90, 95% CI -13.13 to -4.67; 68 participants; one study; moderate-quality evidence). We found no evidence of a reduction in hospitalisations (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.62; 151 participants; two studies; I2 = 0%; low-quality evidence), in the number of participants with serious adverse events, including pneumonia, respiratory and non-respiratory infections, haemoptysis, and gastroenteritis (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.20 to 1.23; 326 participants; three studies; I2 = 0%; low-quality evidence), or in the number experiencing adverse events (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.35; 435 participants; five studies; I2 = 28%) in adults with macrolides compared with placebo.In children, there were no differences in exacerbation frequency (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.11 to 1.41; 89 children; one study; low-quality evidence); hospitalisations (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.07 to 1.11; 89 children; one study; low-quality evidence), serious adverse events, defined within the study as exacerbations of bronchiectasis or investigations related to bronchiectasis (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.17 to 1.05; 89 children; one study; low-quality evidence), or adverse events (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.83; 89 children; one study), in those receiving macrolides compared to placebo. The same study reported an increase in macrolide-resistant bacteria (OR 7.13, 95% CI 2.13 to 23.79; 89 children; one study), an increase in resistance to Streptococcus pneumoniae (OR 13.20, 95% CI 1.61 to 108.19; 89 children; one study), and an increase in resistance to Staphylococcus aureus (OR 4.16, 95% CI 1.06 to 16.32; 89 children; one study) with macrolides compared with placebo. Quality of life was not reported in the studies with children. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Long-term macrolide therapy may reduce the frequency of exacerbations and improve quality of life, although supporting evidence is derived mainly from studies of azithromycin, rather than other macrolides, and predominantly among adults rather than children. However, macrolides should be used with caution, as limited data indicate an associated increase in microbial resistance. Macrolides are associated with increased risk of cardiovascular death and other serious adverse events in other populations, and available data cannot exclude a similar risk among patients with bronchiectasis.

Prophylactic antibiotic therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

BACKGROUND: There has been renewal of interest in the use of prophylactic antibiotics to reduce the frequency of exacerbations and improve quality of life in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). OBJECTIVES: To determine whether or not regular (continuous, intermittent or pulsed) treatment of COPD patients with prophylactic antibiotics reduces exacerbations or affects quality of life. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Trials Register and bibliographies of relevant studies. The latest literature search was performed on 27 July 2018. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared prophylactic antibiotics with placebo in patients with COPD. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used the standard Cochrane methods. Two independent review authors selected studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We resolved discrepancies by involving a third review author. MAIN RESULTS: We included 14 studies involving 3932 participants in this review. We identified two further studies meeting inclusion criteria but both were terminated early without providing results. All studies were published between 2001 and 2015. Nine studies were of continuous macrolide antibiotics, two studies were of intermittent antibiotic prophylaxis (three times per week) and two were of pulsed antibiotic regimens (e.g. five days every eight weeks). The final study included one continuous, one intermittent and one pulsed arm. The antibiotics investigated were azithromycin, erythromycin, clarithromycin, doxycyline, roxithromycin and moxifloxacin. The study duration varied from three months to 36 months and all used intention-to-treat analysis. Most of the pooled results were of moderate quality. The risk of bias of the included studies was generally low.The studies recruited participants with a mean age between 65 and 72 years and mostly at least moderate-severity COPD. Five studies only included participants with frequent exacerbations and two studies recruited participants requiring systemic steroids or antibiotics or both, or who were at the end stage of their disease and required oxygen. One study recruited participants with pulmonary hypertension secondary to COPD and a further study was specifically designed to asses whether eradication of Chlamydia pneumoniae reduced exacerbation rates.The co-primary outcomes for this review were the number of exacerbations and quality of life.With use of prophylactic antibiotics, the number of participants experiencing one or more exacerbations was reduced (odds ratio (OR) 0.57, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.78; participants = 2716; studies = 8; moderate-quality evidence). This represented a reduction from 61% of participants in the control group compared to 47% in the treatment group (95% CI 39% to 55%). The number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome with prophylactic antibiotics given for three to 12 months to prevent one person from experiencing an exacerbation (NNTB) was 8 (95% CI 5 to 17). The test for subgroup difference suggested that continuous and intermittent antibiotics may be more effective than pulsed antibiotics (P = 0.02, I² = 73.3%).The frequency of exacerbations per patient per year was also reduced with prophylactic antibiotic treatment (rate ratio 0.67; 95% CI 0.54 to 0.83; participants = 1384; studies = 5; moderate-quality evidence). Although we were unable to pool the result, six of the seven studies reporting time to first exacerbation identified an increase (i.e. benefit) with antibiotics, which was reported as statistically significant in four studies.There was a statistically significant improvement in quality of life as measured by the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) with prophylactic antibiotic treatment, but this was smaller than the four unit improvement that is regarded as being clinically significant (mean difference (MD) -1.94, 95% CI -3.13 to -0.75; participants = 2237; studies = 7, high-quality evidence).Prophylactic antibiotics showed no significant effect on the secondary outcomes of frequency of hospital admissions, change in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), serious adverse events or all-cause mortality (moderate-quality evidence). There was some evidence of benefit in exercise tolerance, but this was driven by a single study of lower methodological quality.The adverse events that were recorded varied among the studies depending on the antibiotics used. Azithromycin was associated with significant hearing loss in the treatment group, which was in many cases reversible or partially reversible. The moxifloxacin pulsed study reported a significantly higher number of adverse events in the treatment arm due to the marked increase in gastrointestinal adverse events (P < 0.001). Some adverse events that led to drug discontinuation, such as development of long QTc or tinnitus, were not significantly more frequent in the treatment group than the placebo group but pose important considerations in clinical practice.The development of antibiotic resistance in the community is of major concern. Six studies reported on this, but we were unable to combine results. One study found newly colonised participants to have higher rates of antibiotic resistance. Participants colonised with moxifloxacin-sensitive pseudomonas at initiation of therapy rapidly became resistant with the quinolone treatment. A further study with three active treatment arms found an increase in the degree of antibiotic resistance of isolates in all three arms after 13 weeks treatment. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Use of continuous and intermittent prophylactic antibiotics results in a clinically significant benefit in reducing exacerbations in COPD patients. All studies of continuous and intermittent antibiotics used macrolides, hence the noted benefit applies only to the use of macrolide antibiotics prescribed at least three times per week. The impact of pulsed antibiotics remains uncertain and requires further research.The studies in this review included mostly participants who were frequent exacerbators with at least moderate-severity COPD. There were also older individuals with a mean age over 65 years. The results of these studies apply only to the group of participants who were studied in these studies and may not be generalisable to other groups.Because of concerns about antibiotic resistance and specific adverse effects, consideration of prophylactic antibiotic use should be mindful of the balance between benefits to individual patients and the potential harms to society created by antibiotic overuse. Monitoring of significant side effects including hearing loss, tinnitus, and long QTc in the community in this elderly patient group may require extra health resources.

In vitro potential cytogenetic and oxidative stress effects of roxithromycin.

Macrolide antibiotic roxithromycin was evaluated in terms of its genotoxic, cytotoxic and oxidative stress effects. For this purpose; 25, 50, 100 and 200 µg/mL concentrations of roxithromycin were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide and treated to human peripheral blood lymphocytes for two different treatment periods (24 and 48 h). In chromosome aberration (CA) and micronucleus (MN) tests, roxithromycin did not show genotoxic effect. But it induced sister chromatid exchange (SCE) at the highest concentration (200 µg/mL) for the 24-h treatment period and at all concentrations (except 25 µg/mL) for the 48-h treatment period. Looking at cytotoxic effect of roxithromycin, statistically insignificant decreases on mitotic index and proliferation index were observed. Roxithromycin decreased nuclear division index (NDI) at highest two concentrations (100 and 200 µg/mL) for the 24-h treatment period and at all concentrations (expect 25 µg/mL) for the 48-h treatment period. Total oxidant values, total antioxidant values and oxidative stress index did not change with roxithromycin treatment. Eventually, roxithromycin did not have genotoxic and oxidative stress effects in human-cultured lymphocytes.

Roxithromycin-induced toxic epidermal necrolysis.

This case report highlights a very rare adverse drug reaction of oral roxithromycin causing toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). A 54-year-old male patient diagnosed with upper respiratory tract infection was prescribed oral roxithromycin 150 mg twice daily for 7 days. On the 10th day, the patient was admitted to the emergency with sore throat, redness, watering of eyes, painful micturition, and severe skin lesions. The skin lesions were multiple, severely painful, burning, coalesced, and filled with fluid-producing large blisters appearing on the lip, face, and trunk and then gradually spreading to legs, arms, palms, hands, and feet extensively involving much >30% of body surface area. Clinical examination, blood investigation, and histopathological examination of the skin confirmed the diagnosis of TEN. There was no history of any concomitant medications, drug allergy, burn injury, recent graft, or transplant or any coexisting infections such as herpes simplex. Other resembling skin diseases were eliminated after proper dermatological examination. This episode of TEN was probably drug (roxithromycin) induced. The drug was immediately stopped, and the patient was treated meticulously resulting in gradual reversal of the diseased state. Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale suggested the likelihood that oral administration of roxithromycin was responsible for the TEN was 'probable.'

Effect of roxithromycin on contractile activity of gastrointestinal smooth muscles in colitic rats.

OBJECTIVES: Roxithromycin, a macrolide antibiotic, has been shown to ameliorate acetic acid induced colitis in rats by suppressing inflammation and oxidative stress. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of roxithromycin on small intestinal transit and cholinergic responsiveness of the colonic smooth muscles of colitic rats. METHODS: Colitis was induced in rats by acetic acid and the small intestinal transit was determined by measuring the distance traversed by charcoal meal from the gastro-duodenal junction in 1 h. The test drug roxithromycin, reference drug mesalazine and anti-inflammatory drug diclofenac were administered orally before inducing colitis and their effect on intestinal transit was compared with colitic control group. The effect on cholinergic responsiveness of colonic smooth muscles was evaluated in vitro by plotting a dose-response curve using different concentrations of acetylcholine. The concentration producing 50% of maximal response (EC50) was calculated for all the treatment groups. RESULTS: The small intestinal transit was enhanced in colitic rats as compared to normal rats (86.00 ± 1.36 vs. 57.00 ± 1.34 cm; p<0.001). Like mesalazine, roxithromycin normalized intestinal transit while diclofenac was ineffective. The results of in vitro experiment show that colitis increased cholinergic responsiveness of the colonic smooth muscles that was not affected by roxithromycin and mesalazine while diclofenac significantly decreased it. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that like mesalazine, roxithromycin affords protection in colitis mainly by normalizing propulsive movement of the small intestine than by affecting cholinergic responsiveness of the colonic smooth muscles.

Roxithromycin-Associated Acute Thrombocytopenia.

BACKGROUND Recently, some case reports have been published on the macrolide antimicrobials azithromycin and clarithromycin as the cause of thrombocytopenia. The publicly accessible databases of the European Medicine Agency and the WHO drug monitoring program contain dozens of reports of roxithromycin-associated thrombocytopenia. CASE REPORT We described the case of a 78-year-old woman presenting to our unit with petechial lesions of the palate, 2 hematomas of the tongue, and purpuric macules in the abdomen and in the left lower limb 4 days after a course of roxithromycin. She presented to the Emergency Department with 3 out-of-range blood test results: neutrophils (11 960/mL; range: 1500-7000/mL), platelet count (3000/mL; range: 150 000-400 000/mL), and lactate dehydrogenase (379 IU/L; range: 135-225 IU/L). Thrombocytopenia occurred in the absence of aggregates and observed nucleolated lymphocytes. Lymphoproliferative pathologies and thrombotic microangiopathy were excluded by the hematologist. To rule out neoplastic lesions, an abdominal ultrasound examination was made. Antibody screening was performed for antinuclear antibodies, extractable nuclear antigen, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (all negative), and for Parvovirus B-19 (IgM negative, IgG positive), as well as HHV-6 and HHV-8 (both negative), to exclude an autoimmune or viral etiology. She recovered after intravenous methylprednisolone 60 mg/day and intravenous-immunoglobulin therapy 400 mg/kg/day. After 9 days, the patient was discharged with resolution of skin and buccal lesions. Her platelet count was 515 000/mL. CONCLUSIONS To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of roxithromycin-associated acute autoimmune thrombocytopenia reported in the medical literature. We suggest that clinicians should consider this drug to be among the possible causes of drug-induced thrombocytopenia.

Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis associated with the use of macrolide antibiotics: a review of published cases.

Macrolides are one of the most commonly prescribed antibiotics. In several studies, their use was associated with the occurrence of Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). This review aimed to explore and summarize available cases of SJS/TEN suspected to be associated with the use of macrolide antibiotics reported in the literature. Electronic searches were conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Serbian Citation Index (SCIndeks). Twenty-five publications describing a total of 27 patients were included. Cases of SJS/TEN which satisfied inclusion criteria were found for azithromycin (n = 11), clarithromycin (n = 7), erythromycin (n = 5), roxithromycin (n = 2), and telithromycin (n = 2). The age of the patients ranged from 2 to 77 years (median: 29 years). There were 14 female (51.9%) and 13 male (48.1%) patients. SJS was diagnosed in 16 patients (59.3%), TEN in 10 patients (37.0%), and SJS/TEN overlap in one patient (3.7%). Time to onset of the first symptoms ranged from 1 to 14 days (median: 3 days). All patients received some form of supportive and symptomatic care. Systemic corticosteroids were reported to be administered in 12 patients (44.4%) and intravenous immunoglobulin in five patients (18.5%). Three patients (11.1%) died. Considering that SJS/TEN is a severe and potentially life-threatening reaction, physicians should be aware that they could be adverse effects of macrolide antibiotics and keep in mind that prompt recognition of SJS/TEN and discontinuation of the culprit drug in combination with supportive care is essential.

Case Series Analysis of New Zealand Reports of Rapid Intense Potentiation of Warfarin by Roxithromycin.

INTRODUCTION: We undertook an analysis of all the reports to the New Zealand Centre for Adverse Reactions Monitoring of a roxithromycin/warfarin interaction after two recent reports described intense rapid warfarin potentiation. The interaction was first published in 1995. Cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibition has been the proposed mechanism but has limited biologic plausibility. There are suggestions that the clinical significance of the interaction may be increased by severe illness, polypharmacy, renal dysfunction, older age and increased warfarin sensitivity. METHODS: To investigate the potentiating effect of warfarin on roxithromycin in this New Zealand case series, the reports were reviewed to identify patients at risk, compare the reporting pattern with published Australian data and evaluate the appropriateness of current prescribing advice. RESULTS: Thirty patient reports were identified. The age range was 23-88 years, mean 66.8, median 73.0 (standard deviation 17.7) and the international normalised ratios after roxithromycin commencement ranged from 3.6 to 16.7 (mean 7.6, median 7.6, standard deviation 3.6). For eight patients with measurements on day 3, international normalised ratios were 4.3-16.7 (mean 10.4, median 8.8, standard deviation 4.4). Four patients had serious haemorrhage. Indications for roxithromycin were a range of respiratory tract infections. Anticoagulation was stable for most patients prior to acute infection. Serious infection occurred in 54.5% (12 of 22 patients with information). Polypharmacy (five or more medicines daily) was used by 36.7% of patients long term, increasing acutely to 83.3%, including additional potentially interacting medicines. Warfarin daily dose (1.5-13.0 mg, mean 4.4, median 4.0, standard deviation 2.2) was moderate to low. Pre-roxithromycin international normalised ratio values ranged from 1.4 to 3.7, mean and median 2.5, standard deviation 0.5. A high proportion of interactions were observed between warfarin and roxithromycin compared with other macrolides and compared with cytochrome P450 3A4-related macrolide interactions. The pattern was similar to published Australian data. CONCLUSION: In this case series, the high prevalence of acute polypharmacy, including potentially interacting medicines, and serious infection suggests that they may have contributed to warfarin potentiation and increased the clinical significance of a roxithromycin/warfarin interaction.

Preparation of roxithromycin-polymeric microspheres by the emulsion solvent diffusion method for taste masking.

Microspheres of roxithromycin with Eudragit S100 and silica were prepared by the emulsion solvent diffusion method to mask the bitter taste of the antibiotic. The effect of different polymers and drug-polymer ratios on the taste masking and the characteristics of the microspheres were investigated. It was found that Eudragit S100 was the best for masking the unpleasant taste of roxithromycin among the six kinds of polymers investigated. The results of DSC, X-ray diffraction and IR showed that there were several combinations of roxithromycin and Eudragit S100. The influence of other formulation factors, i.e. dichloromethane-acetone ratios and silica-polymer ratios on the properties of the microspheres were also examined. In conclusion, the results of the present study will be helpful for the preparation of oral forms of roxithromycin with an acceptable taste.

Roxithromycin treatment prevents progression of peripheral arterial occlusive disease in Chlamydia pneumoniae seropositive men: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Evidence has been provided that the atherosclerotic process may be associated with chronic infection with Chlamydia pneumoniae. The effect of antibiotic treatment on peripheral arterial occlusive disease has not been investigated yet. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty C pneumoniae seropositive men suffering from peripheral arterial occlusive disease were randomly assigned to receive either roxithromycin (300 mg daily) or placebo for 28 days. During the 2.7-year follow-up, the number of invasive revascularizations per patient, the walking distance before intervention (in patients without intervention at study end), and the change of carotid plaque size were assessed. Five interventions were performed on 4 patients (20%) in the roxithromycin group, and 29 interventions were performed on 9 patients (45%) in the placebo group. Limitation of walking distance to 200 m or less was observed in 4 patients (20%) in the roxithromycin group and in 13 patients (65%) in the placebo group. The effect of macrolide treatment on the number of interventions per patient and on preinterventional walking distance was significant. Possible confounding variables such as classical vascular risk factors were excluded by multiple regression analyses. Carotid plaque areas monitored over 6 months decreased in the roxithromycin group (mean relative value, 94.4%) but remained constant in the placebo group (100.2%). Regression of carotid plaque size observed in roxithromycin-treated patients was significant for soft plaques. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that macrolide treatment for 1 month is effective in preventing C pneumoniae seropositive men from progression of lower limb atherosclerosis for several years.

Interaction between roxithromycin and cyclosporin in heart transplant patients.

Cyclosporin is an immunosuppressive agent commonly used in transplant patients. It is actively metabolised by the cytochrome P450 system and interactions with drugs metabolised by the same system are predictable. This is particularly relevant since cyclosporin has a low therapeutic index and its renal toxicity is concentration-related. Roxithromycin, a new, well-tolerated macrolide with a weak interactive profile, uses the same isoenzyme of the P450 system as cyclosporin. To evaluate its interaction potential in clinical practice, 8 heart transplant recipients treated with cyclosporin for at least 1 month received roxithromycin for 11 days (150 mg twice daily). Bi-weekly controls of plasma cyclosporin concentrations and creatinine levels were carried out before, during and after roxithromycin treatment. A slight nonsignificant rise in cyclosporin concentrations was observed, but creatinine levels remained stable during roxithromycin treatment. Values of cyclosporin concentrations diminished after withdrawal of roxithromycin. Cyclosporin dosage adjustment was not necessary. There was a minor pharmacokinetic interaction, which can be considered safe for the usual therapeutic dosage of roxithromycin used.

Roxithromycin. An update of its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use.

Roxithromycin is a derivative of the macrolide antibacterial erythromycin with in vitro antibacterial activity resembling that of the parent compound. The drug has activity against some Staphylococcus spp., many Streptococcus spp., Moraxella (Branhamella) catarrhalis, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila and Chlamydia trachomatis as well as many less common organisms. Measured using recently proposed guidelines, roxithromycin has in vitro activity against Haemophilus influenzae. In comparison with that of its parent compound, the pharmacokinetic profile of roxithromycin is characterised by high plasma, tissue and body fluid concentrations and a long half-life permitting an extended dosage interval. Roxithromycin has proven clinical efficacy in upper and lower respiratory infections, skin and soft tissue infections, urogenital infections and orodental infections, and appears to be as effective as more established treatments including erythromycin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and cefaclor. The drug has also shown promise in a variety of more specialised indications including opportunistic infections in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients and as part of a Helicobacter pylori eradication regimen. Roxithromycin is very well tolerated with an overall incidence of adverse events of approximately 4%. Thus, roxithromycin is an attractive therapeutic alternative in its established indications, especially when the option of once-daily administration is considered.

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori with lansoprazole, roxithromycin and metronidazole--an open pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The most extensively studied Helicobacter pylori eradication regimen comprises omeprazole, clarithromycin and metronidazole. Macrolide antibiotics other than clarithromycin should achieve similar efficacy, but they have not yet been thoroughly tested. AIM: To determine the efficacy and safety of a triple therapy regimen using lansoprazole, roxithromycin, and metronidazole on the basis of multicentre outpatient care in an open pilot study. METHODS: 163 patients with duodenal ulcer and proven H. pylori infection received lansoprazole 30 mg b.d., roxithromycin 300 mg b.d. and metronidazole 500 mg b.d. for 7 days followed by another 7 days of lansoprazole 30 mg once daily. H. pylori status was determined by urease quick test, histology, microbiology and 13C-urea breath test before starting and at least 4 weeks after completing treatment. RESULTS: 150 patients were available for evaluation; H. pylori was successfully eradicated in 84.7% (127/ 150) as determined by urease quick test, 78.0% (117/150) by histology, 81.3% (109/134) by 13C-urea breath test; and in 75.3% (113/150), at least two tests were negative. Side-effects were reported in 34 patients (most commonly diarrhoea and changes in liver function tests), in two cases the study medication was interrupted. Prior to treatment, 23% of the H. pylori isolates were resistant against metronidazole and 3.4% against roxithromycin. After unsuccessful treatment, 84% of the isolates were resistant against metronidazole and 21% against roxithromycin. Primary resistance to metronidazole increased the chance of treatment failure approximately sevenfold (7% vs. 53%). CONCLUSIONS: For H. pylori eradication, the combination of lansoprazole, roxithromycin and metronidazole proved to be as safe as other current triple therapy regimens, while a comparison of efficacy rates yet remains to be assessed in prospective controlled trials. The metronidazole-resistant H. pylori is not rare in Germany and, in the present study, has strongly influenced treatment success.

Pharmacokinetic interaction between proton pump inhibitors and roxithromycin in volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Triple therapy including two antibiotics and a proton pump inhibitor is a rational approach to the treatment of Helicobacter pylori induced peptic ulcer disease. The interaction of antimicrobial therapy and acid suppression is not yet well elucidated. AIMS: To investigate the effects of proton pump inhibitors on roxithromycin levels in plasma and gastric tissue under steady-state conditions in volunteers. METHODS: In two crossover studies omeprazole 20 mg b.d., lansoprazole 30 mg b.d., roxithromycin 300 mg b.d., and the combination of roxithromycin with either omeprazole or lansoprazole were administered to 12 healthy volunteers over 6 days. Blood plasma levels of the drugs were measured. In addition, roxithromycin concentrations were also determined in gastric juice and gastric tissue obtained during endoscopy. RESULTS: The proton pump inhibitors and roxithromycin did not alter the blood plasma pharmacokinetics of each other. When compared to roxithromycin administered alone, its combination with a proton pump inhibitor significantly increased the roxithromycin concentrations in gastric juice (3.0-5.0 microg/mL vs. 0.3-0.4 microg/mL) and gastric tissue (antrum: 3.8-4.0 vs. 2.8 microg/g, fundus: 5.9-7.4 vs. 4.2-4.4 microg/g). CONCLUSIONS: Proton pump inhibitors and roxithromycin do not alter the systemic bioavailability of each other. However, proton pump inhibitors increase the local concentration of roxithromycin in the stomach which may contribute to the clinically proven synergic beneficial action in eradication therapy of H. pylori.

A new quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori: influence of resistant strains on treatment outcome.

BACKGROUND: There have been no reports concerning the efficacy and safety of a 1-week quadruple therapy regimen of omeprazole, amoxycillin, roxithromycin and metronidazole for Helicobacter pylori infections and the impact of primary resistance on the eradication rate. METHODS: One hundred and sixty-nine consecutive patients with peptic ulcer disease as well as gastritis with biopsy-proven H. pylori infection were entered into an open study of omeprazole 20 mg o.m., amoxycillin 500 mg t.d.s., roxithromycin 150 mg b.d., and metronidazole 250 mg t.d.s. Helicobacter pylori status was determined by urease test, histology and culture. Susceptibility to amoxycillin, metronidazole and roxithromycin was determined by the E-test. RESULTS: H. pylori was eradicated in 155 out of 169 (92%; 95% CI 88-96%) by intention-to-treat analysis, and in 155 out of 163 (95%; 95% CI 92-98%) by per protocol analysis. The prevalence of primary resistance against amoxycillin, roxithromycin and metronidazole was 2 out of 166 (1%), 16 out of 166 (10%) and 27 out of 166 (16%), respectively. H. pylori was eradicated in 25 out of 27 (93%) patients with metronidazole-resistant strains compared with 130 out of 136 (96%) in patients with metronidazole-sensitive strains of H. pylori. It was eradicated in 15 out of 16 (94%) patients with roxithromycin-resistant strains while in 140 out of 147 (95%) patients with roxithromycin-sensitive strains of H. pylori, and in two out of two (100%) patients with amoxycillin-resistant stains compared with 153 out of 161 (95%) in patients with amoxycillin-sensitive strains. H. pylori was eradicated in three out of four (75%) patients with double resistance against metronidazole and roxithromycin compared with 152 out of 159 (96%) patients with sensitive strains to metronidazole and or roxithromycin. None of these differences were statistically significant. Severe side-effects were found in only one out of 169 patients-anaphylaxis due to penicillin. CONCLUSIONS: The 1-week quadruple therapy with omeprazole, amoxycillin, metronidazole and roxithromycin was found to eradicate H. pylori in over 90% of all patients. This regimen was also found to be beneficial for patients with pre-treatment resistant strains to metronidazole, roxithromycin or amoxycillin, and was observed to be safe and well-tolerated.

Oral empiric treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. A multicenter, double-blind, randomized study comparing sparfloxacin with roxithromycin. The Scandinavian Sparfloxacin Study Group.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Comparison of efficacy and safety of sparfloxacin (Spfx) vs roxithromycin (ROXI) for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). DESIGN: Multicenter, double-blind, randomized study. SETTING: Twenty-three university and community hospitals in Scandinavia. PATIENTS: Three hundred four adults (> or = 18 years of age) with CAP treated as outpatients (25%) or inpatients (75%). INTERVENTIONS: Randomization 1:1 to Spfx, 400 mg on day 1, then 200 mg once daily, or ROXI, 150 mg twice daily, 10 to 14 days. Safety and efficacy analyses in intention-to-treat (ITT) and evaluable populations. RESULTS: Three hundred three of 304 patients were included in the ITT and safety analyses and 260 (86%) were evaluable at the end of follow-up. Streptococcus pneumoniae was the cause of pneumonia in 62 (20%) patients (11 with bacteremia), Chlamydia pneumoniae in 40 (13%), and Mycoplasma pneumoniae in 38 (13%) patients. The success rates for Spfx and ROXI at the end of follow-up were 82% and 72%, respectively, in the ITT population, and 94% and 79%, respectively, in the evaluable population. The odds ratio Spfx/ROXI for success was 4.5 (95% confidence interval, 1.9, 10.8) for the evaluable population. Both drugs were, overall, equally safe. GI symptoms were the most common adverse experiences in both groups. Prolongation of QTc, without clinical symptoms, was seen in 3% of Spfx patients and in 1% of ROXI patients, and photosensitivity, mostly mild to moderate, was seen in 5% of the Spfx group. CONCLUSIONS: Oral treatment with Spfx was superior to ROXI for the treatment of moderately severe CAP. Spfx was effective for all isolated pathogens, including S pneumoniae, and may be an alternative for empiric treatment of CAP, especially in areas with a high incidence of beta-lactam-resistant pneumococci.

An international clinical trial on the efficacy and safety of roxithromycin in 40,000 patients with acute community-acquired respiratory tract infections.

An ongoing eight-country study is being conducted in an unprecedented number of general practice patients with acute upper and lower respiratory tract infections to compare the efficacy and tolerance of roxithromycin 150 mg b.i.d. for 7-14 days with the data acquired in the prelaunch studies of these same parameters. The target population is 40,000 (to be achieved by the end of 1991) and we report the interim results from 32,405 patients, 18,020 with upper and 14,385 with lower respiratory tract infections. In acute pharyngitis/tonsillitis sinusitis, and otitis, clinical resolution or improvement has been achieved in 97%, 96%, and 96% of cases, respectively. The figures for bronchitis, exacerbation of chronic bronchitis, and pneumonia are 97%, 94%, and 95%. Side effects have been reported in only 4% of patients to date, 75% consisting of moderate gastrointestinal upsets. Of the patients, 1% withdrew from treatment because of side effects. These interim figures confirm the data from the prelaunch, controlled comparative trials and show roxithromycin to be an appropriate choice of first-line antibiotic therapy in the management of respiratory tract infections in general practice.